DOCSLIB.ORG

Per-Capita-Income-Guidelines-For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Per-Capita-Income-Guidelines-For May 21, 2020 Per Capita Income Guidelines for Operational Purposes The per capita Gross National Income (GNI) guidelines covering the Civil Works Public Disclosure Authorized Preference, IDA Eligibility, IBRD Terms and the initiation of IBRD graduation process are updated every year, based on the annual rate of change of the SDR-deflator [see President’s Memorandum to the Executive Directors dated September 27, 1983 (SecM83- 924)]. The updated operational guidelines to be applied during FY21 are as follows: Operational Categories* FY21 Guidelines (2019 US$) (i) Civil Works Preference Less than or equal to $1,035 (ii) Effective IDA Eligibility Less than or equal to $1,185 (iii) IBRD terms More than $1,185 (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation More than $7,065 Public Disclosure Authorized High-income threshold** More than $12,535 * These categories reflect changes introduced in accordance with the Memorandum to the Executive Directors dated January 17, 2008 (R2008-0007). ** The High-income threshold has been included for reference, in light of the Development Committee paper DC2018-002/P. Per capita GNI data (Attachment 1) for borrowing member countries for 2019 have been prepared in accordance with the procedures described in SecM2000-625. Public Disclosure Authorized Acting Vice President and Chief Economist: Mr. Aart C. Kraay Public Disclosure Authorized Director: Ms. Haishan Fu Task Team Leader: Mr. Bala Bhaskar Kalimili With the 2019 per capita GNI estimates, the following countries will change classification in the FY20 Operational Guidelines (Attachment 3). Classification in FY21 FY20 Benin (iii) IBRD Terms (i) Civil Works Preference Equatorial Guinea (iii) IBRD Terms (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation Gabon (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation (iii) IBRD Terms Libya (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation (iii) IBRD Terms Nepal (ii) Effective IDA (i) Civil Works Preference Tanzania (ii) Effective IDA (i) Civil Works Preference Thailand (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation (iii) IBRD Terms Sudan (i) Civil Works Preference (iii) IBRD Terms For a number of countries, the per capita GNI can only be estimated as a range. These estimated ranges, while useful to place the countries in specific operational categories, are shown as “NA” (not available) in Attachment 1. Attachment 2 shows growth rates of per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in constant prices for 2019. We will use the updated guidelines and per capita GNI estimates for all operations for which invitations to negotiate are sent out from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Attachment 1 21-May-20 2019 GNI PER CAPITA Ranked by 2019 GNI per capita (US$ dollars) Income group and country 2019 GNI Income group and country 2019 GNI Income group and country 2019 GNI per capita per capita per capita (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation (over $7,065) (iii) IBRD Terms (over $1,185) (ii) Effective IDA ($1,185 or less) High income (over $12,535) 1 St. Kitts and Nevis 19,030 Guatemala 4,610 Nepal 1,090 Trinidad and Tobago 16,890 Moldova 4,560 Tanzania 1,080 Seychelles 16,870 Azerbaijan 4,480 Antigua and Barbuda 16,660 Belize 4,450 (i) Civil Works Preference ($1,035 or less) Uruguay 16,230 Jordan2 4,300 Tajikistan 1,030 Poland 15,200 Samoa 4,180 Guinea 950 Chile 15,010 Indonesia 4,050 Mali 880 Panama 14,950 Sri Lanka 4,020 Ethiopia 850 Croatia 14,910 El Salvador 4,000 Guinea-Bissau 820 Nauru2 14,230 Algeria 3,970 Rwanda 820 Mauritius 12,740 Philippines 3,850 Burkina Faso 790 Romania 12,630 Mongolia 3,780 Haiti 790 Costa Rica 11,700 Cabo Verde 3,630 Uganda 780 Russian Federation3 11,260 Eswatini 3,590 Gambia, The 740 Argentina 11,200 Djibouti 3,540 Chad 700 Malaysia 11,200 Bolivia 3,530 Togo 690 St. Lucia 11,020 Ukraine3 3,370 Sudan 590 China 10,410 Tunisia 3,360 Liberia 580 Grenada 9,980 Kiribati 3,350 Niger 560 Maldives 9,650 Morocco 3,190 Afghanistan 540 Turkey 9,610 Vanuatu 3,170 Central African Republic 520 Mexico 9,430 Angola 3,050 Congo, Dem. Rep. 520 Bulgaria 9,410 Papua New Guinea 2,780 Madagascar 520 Brazil 9,130 Egypt, Arab Rep. 2,690 Sierra Leone 500 Montenegro 9,010 Lao PDR 2,570 Mozambique 480 Kazakhstan 8,810 Vietnam 2,540 Malawi 380 Dominica 8,090 Honduras 2,390 Burundi 280 Dominican Republic 8,090 Cote d'Ivoire 2,290 Eritrea4 NA Botswana 7,660 Ghana 2,220 Somalia4 NA Libya 7,640 India 2,130 South Sudan4 NA Lebanon2 7,600 Solomon Islands 2,050 Syrian Arab Republic2,4 NA St. Vincent and the Grenadines 7,460 Nigeria 2,030 Yemen, Rep.4 NA Thailand 7,260 Sao Tome and Principe 1,960 Gabon 7,210 Bangladesh 1,940 Palau4 NA Nicaragua 1,910 Timor-Leste 1,890 (iii) IBRD Terms (over $1,185) Uzbekistan 1,800 Serbia 7,020 Congo, Rep. 1,750 Peru 6,740 Kenya 1,750 Colombia 6,510 Mauritania 1,660 Equatorial Guinea 6,460 Pakistan 1,560 Belarus 6,280 Cameroon 1,500 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6,150 Cambodia 1,480 Ecuador 6,080 Senegal 1,450 South Africa 6,040 Zambia 1,450 North Macedonia 5,910 Comoros 1,420 Fiji 5,860 Myanmar 1,390 Iraq2 5,740 Zimbabwe 1,390 Tuvalu 5,620 Lesotho 1,360 Suriname 5,540 Benin 1,250 Paraguay 5,510 Kyrgyz Republic 1,240 Jamaica 5,250 Bhutan4 NA Albania 5,240 Iran, Islamic Rep.4 NA Guyana 5,180 Marshall Islands4 NA Namibia 5,060 Micronesia, Fed. Sts.4 NA Georgia 4,740 Tonga4 NA Armenia 4,670 Turkmenistan4 NA Kosovo 4,640 Venezuela, RB4 NA 1 In light of the approval of the Development Committee Paper DC2018-002/P, Sustainable Finance for Sustainable Development, the High Income threshold has been included for reference. 2 Refugees are included in the population estimates of host country for Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Nauru, and Syrian Arab Republic. 3 These calculations are based on numbers and data from official statistics of Ukraine and the Russian Federation; by relying on those numbers and data, the Bank does not intend to make any judgment on the legal or other status of the territories concerned or to prejudice the final determination of the parties' claims. 4 Estimates are available in ranges only for NA countries. Attachment 2 21-May-20 2019 GROWTH RATE of GDP PER CAPITA (% change) Ranked by 2019 GNI per capita Income group and country 2019 GDP Income group and country 2019 GDP Income group and country 2019 GDP per capita, per capita, per capita, growth growth growth (iv) Initiating IBRD Graduation (over $7,065) (iii) IBRD Terms (over $1,185) (ii) Effective IDA ($1,185 or less) High income (over $12,535) 1 St. Kitts and Nevis 1.8 Guatemala 2.2 Nepal 5.0 Trinidad and Tobago -0.4 Moldova 5.3 Tanzania 2.7 Seychelles 3.8 Azerbaijan 1.4 Antigua and Barbuda 3.8 Belize -1.6 (i) Civil Works Preference ($1,035 or less) Uruguay -0.1 Jordan2 0.5 Tajikistan 4.5 Poland 4.2 Samoa 3.0 Guinea 2.6 Chile -0.1 Indonesia 3.9 Mali 1.9 Panama 1.3 Sri Lanka 1.7 Ethiopia 5.5 Croatia 3.5 El Salvador 1.9 Guinea-Bissau 2.1 Nauru2 1.0 Algeria -1.1 Rwanda 6.6 Mauritius 3.5 Philippines 4.6 Burkina Faso 2.7 Romania 4.7 Mongolia 3.3 Haiti -2.2 Costa Rica 1.1 Cabo Verde 4.5 Uganda 2.8 Russian Federation3 1.4 Eswatini 1.0 Gambia, The 2.9 Argentina -3.1 Djibouti 5.9 Chad 0.2 Malaysia 3.0 Bolivia 0.8 Togo 2.8 St. Lucia 1.2 Ukraine3 3.8 Sudan -4.9 China 5.7 Tunisia -0.1 Liberia -4.6 Grenada 2.6 Kiribati 0.7 Niger 1.9 Maldives 2.2 Morocco 1.0 Afghanistan 0.5 Turkey -0.5 Vanuatu 0.4 Central African Republic 1.3 Mexico -1.2 Angola -4.0 Congo, Dem. Rep. 1.1 Bulgaria 4.1 Papua New Guinea 3.6 Madagascar 2.1 Brazil 0.4 Egypt, Arab Rep. 3.5 Sierra Leone 3.3 Montenegro 3.6 Lao PDR 3.1 Mozambique -0.7 Kazakhstan 3.2 Vietnam 6.0 Malawi 1.6 Dominica 5.4 Honduras 1.0 Burundi -1.3 Dominican Republic 4.0 Cote d'Ivoire 4.2 Eritrea4 NA Botswana 0.8 Ghana 4.2 Somalia4 NA Libya 1.0 India 4.0 South Sudan4 NA Lebanon2 -5.7 Solomon Islands 0.1 Syrian Arab Republic2,4 NA St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0 Nigeria -0.4 Yemen, Rep.4 NA Thailand 2.1 Sao Tome and Principe 0.5 Gabon 0.9 Bangladesh 7.0 Palau4 NA Nicaragua -5.1 Timor-Leste 1.4 (iii) IBRD Terms (over $1,185) Uzbekistan 3.6 Serbia Congo, Rep. -3.4 Peru 0.5 Kenya 3.0 Colombia 1.9 Mauritania 3.1 Equatorial Guinea -8.8 Pakistan 1.3 Belarus 1.4 Cameroon 1.4 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 Cambodia 5.5 Ecuador -1.6 Senegal 2.4 South Africa -1.2 Zambia -1.2 North Macedonia 3.5 Comoros 0.5 Fiji 0.3 Myanmar 2.2 Iraq2 2.1 Zimbabwe -9.4 Tuvalu 8.5 Lesotho 0.7 Suriname -1.7 Benin 4.0 Paraguay -1.3 Kyrgyz Republic 2.3 Jamaica 0.2 Bhutan4 NA Albania 2.7 Iran, Islamic Rep.4 NA Guyana 4.2 Marshall Islands4 NA Namibia -3.0 Micronesia, Fed. Sts.4 NA Georgia 5.3 Tonga4 NA Armenia 7.4 Turkmenistan4 NA Kosovo 4.3 Venezuela, RB4 NA 1 In light of the approval of the Development Committee Paper DC2018-002/P, Sustainable Finance for Sustainable Development, the High Income threshold has been included for reference.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Growth of the Indian Economy: 1860-1960
    THE GROWTH OF THE INDIAN ECONOMY: 1860-1960 BY KRISHANG. SAINI* The University of Texas This paper is concerned with an examination of growth trends of the Indian economy between 1860 and 1960. This examination commences with the numerous studies bearing on the more recent part of this period, from about 1900 to 1960. These studies are shown to vary greatly in coverage and comprehensiveness, and their differences and individual shortcomings are assessed. Nevertheless, these studies conclude, without exception, that the Indian economy remained virtually stationary in this period, especially in terms of negligible growth in per capita real income. In contrast to periods since 1900, the study of economic growth during the earlier period has suffered academic neglect. There are only two major studies which make an attempt to examine economic trends in this period. Both these studies are found wanting with respect to concepts and procedures. The period from 1860 to 1913 presents serious problems in any study since there is a paucity of statistics which are at all reliableand useful. The most promising approach for overcoming this deficiency is to develop better sectoral statistics rather than to rely on aggregative data even when available. In order to gain a better understanding of the growth trends of the Indian economy over this period, the author constructed indices of major economic activities. These indices demonstrate that relatively high rate of economic growth prevailed in India before 1890. Subsequent developments in the Indian economy seem to consist of minor changes in the magnitudes of economic variables rather than fundamental structural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Palau Along a Path of Sustainability, While Also Ensuring That No One Is Left Behind
    0 FOREWORD I am pleased to present our first Voluntary National Review on the SDGs. This Review is yet another important benchmark in our ongoing commitment to transform Palau along a path of sustainability, while also ensuring that no one is left behind. This journey towards a sustainable future is not one for gov- ernment alone, nor a single nation, but for us all. Given the SDG’s inherent inter-linkages, we acknowledge that our challenges are also interrelated, and thus so too must be our solutions. The accelerated pace of global change we see today makes it particularly diffi- cult for small island nations, like Palau, to keep up, let alone achieve sustaina- ble development. Despite this challenge, we firmly believe that we can achieve a sustainable future for Palau. Our conviction stems from our certainty that we can confront our challenges by combining our lessons from the past with new information and modern technology and use them to guide us to stay the right course along our path to the future. Just as important, we are also confi- dent in this endeavor because we can also find solutions amongst each other. Over the past three years, Palau has systematically pursued a rigorous process of assessing our Pathways to 2030. Eight inter-sector working groups, led by government ministries, but including representatives from civil society, and semi-private organizations, have prepared this initial Voluntary National Review. The groups have selected an initial set of 95 SDG global targets and associated indicators that collectively constitute our initial National SDG Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Argentina
    Spruk Lat Am Econ Rev (2019) 28:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0076-2 Latin American Economic Review RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The rise and fall of Argentina Rok Spruk* *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract School of Economics I examine the contribution of institutional breakdowns to long-run development, and Business, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva drawing on Argentina’s unique departure from a rich country on the eve of World ploscad 27, 1000 Ljubljana, War I to an underdeveloped one today. The empirical strategy is based on building Slovenia a counterfactual scenario to examine the path of Argentina’s long-run development in the absence of breakdowns, assuming it would follow the institutional trends in countries at parallel stages of development. Drawing on Argentina’s large historical bibliography, I have identifed the institutional breakdowns and coded for the period 1850–2012. The synthetic control and diference-in-diferences estimates here suggest that, in the absence of institutional breakdowns, Argentina would largely have avoided the decline and joined the ranks of rich countries with an income level similar to that of New Zealand. Keywords: Long-run development, New institutional economics, Political economy, Argentina, Applied econometrics JEL Classifcation: C23, K16, N16, N46, O43, O47 1 Introduction On the eve of World War I, the future of Argentina looked bright. Since its promulga- tion of the 1853 Constitution, Argentina had experienced strong economic growth and institutional modernization, which had propelled it into the ranks of the 10 wealthi- est countries in the world by 1913. In the aftermath of the war, Argentina’s income per capita fell from a level approximating that of Switzerland to its current middle-income country status.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Diagnosis of Palau Through the Liechtenstein Lens: Moving up the Value Chain– International Political Economy Strategies for Microstates
    EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERS WORKING PAPERS The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to foster mutual understanding and cooperation among the governments and peoples of the Asia-Pacific region, including the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. East-West Center Working Papers are circulated for comment and to inform interested colleagues about work in progress at the Center. For more information about the Center or to order publica- tions, contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96848-1601 Telephone: (808) 944-7145 Facsimile: (808) 944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERS Pacific Islands Development Series No. 17, February 2006 An Economic Diagnosis of Palau Through the Liechtenstein Lens: Moving Up the Value Chain– International Political Economy Strategies for Microstates Kevin D. Stringer Dr. Kevin D. Stringer is an international banker focused on financial institutions. He was a Research Visitor at the East- West Center during the summer of 2005 and has been an adjunct professor in international political economy at Thunderbird, the Garvin School of International Manage- ment. His research interests are microstates, consular diplomacy, and the sovereignty of autonomous regions. He can be reached at: Im Angelrain 46, CH-8185 Winkel, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]. East-West Center Working Papers: Pacific Islands Develop- ment Series is an unreviewed and unedited series reporting on research in progress that is intended to explore new concepts, ideas, and insights relevant to scholars and policy- makers.
    [Show full text]
  • GDP Per Capita Versus Median Household Income: What Gives Rise to Divergence Over Time? SM-WP-2016 May 2016
    Social Macroeconomics Working Paper Series GDP per capita versus median household income: what gives rise to divergence over time? SM-WP-2016 May 2016 Brian Nolan, Max Roser, Stefan Thewissen Institute for New Economic Thinking, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, and Nuffield College, University of Oxford. Copyright for the working paper remains with the author/s. GDP per capita versus median household income: What gives rise to divergence over time?⇤ § Brian Nolan,† Max Roser,‡ and Stefan Thewissen May 2016 Abstract Divergence between the evolution of GDP per capita and the income of a‘typical’householdasmeasuredinhouseholdsurveysisgivingrisetoa range of serious concerns, especially in the USA. This paper investigates the extent of that divergence and the factors that contribute to it across 27 OECD countries, using data from OECD National Accounts and the Luxembourg Income Study. While GDP per capita has risen faster than median household income in most of these countries over the period these data cover, the size of that divergence varied very substantially, with the USA a clear outlier. The paper distinguishes a number of factors contributing to such a divergence, and finds wide variation across countries in the impact of the various factors. Further, both the extent of that divergence and the role of the various contributory factors vary widely over time for most of the countries studied. These findings have serious implications for the monitoring and assessment of changes in household incomes and living standards over time. keywords: Economic growth, inequality, household incomes ⇤The authors are grateful for comments and advice from Tony Atkinson (University of Oxford) and Facundo Alvaredo (Paris School of Economics).
    [Show full text]
  • DIMENSIONS of INCOME INEQUALITY in GREECE Christos Papatheodorou
    DIMENSIONS OF INCOME INEQUALITY IN GREECE Christos Papatheodorou Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science University of London UMI Number: U12B243 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U123243 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 7)A£S£S f 7736 7 \i2Sk- To my parents ABSTRACT This thesis investigated certain dimensions of inequality in Greece that have not or have only partially been explored so far, utilising the micro-data of a survey carried out in 1988 by the National Centre for Social Research. Reviewed were relevant studies conducted in the past, and evaluated were the available statistical data and information. Certain theoretical and methodological issues that one encounters when analysing and measuring inequality were also discussed. Initially, an analysis by income source was employed, which provided valuable information on the structure and profile of income inequality in Greece. The decomposition analysis by income components showed that entrepreneurial income is the most significant contributor to overall inequality in Greece, despite the fact that it represents a relatively small fraction of household income.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile State of Qatar Qatar at a Glance Location
    Profile State of Qatar Qatar at a Glance Capital: Doha Official language: Arabic Population: 2,314,307 (July 2017 est.) Government: absolute monarchy Establishment 3 September 1971 (from the UK) National or Regional Currency: Riyal (QAR) total: 11,586 sq km Area: land: 11,586 sq km water: 0 sq km Location: Middle East, peninsula bordering the Persian Gulf and Saudi Arabia Geographic Coordinates: 25 30 N, 51 15 E Map References: Middle East Area - Comparative: slightly smaller than Connecticut Terrain: mostly flat and barren desert covered with loose sand and gravel Elevation Extremes(M): lowest point: Persian Gulf 0 m ; highest point: Tuwayyir al Hamir 103 m Land Boundaries(Km): total: 87 km ; border countries: Saudi Arabia 87 km Coastline: 563 km Maritime Claims: territorial sea: 12 nm ; contiguous zone: 24 nm ; exclusive economic zone: as determined by bilateral agreements or the median line Geography - Note: strategic location in central Persian Gulf near major petroleum deposits1 History Ruled by the Al Thani family since the mid-1800s, Qatar within the last 60 years transformed itself from a poor British protectorate noted mainly for pearling into an independent state with significant oil and natural gas revenues. The continuous siphoning off of petroleum revenue through the mid-1990s by Qatari amirs permanently residing in Europe had stunted Qatar’s economic growth. Former amir HAMAD bin Khalifa Al Thani, who overthrew his father in a bloodless coup in 1995, ushered in wide-sweeping political and media reforms, unprecedented economic investment, and a growing Qatari regional leadership role, in part through the creation of the pan-Arab satellite news network Al-Jazeera and Qatar's mediation of some regional conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth in Low-Income Countries: Evolution, Prospects, and Policies
    Policy Research Working Paper 8949 Public Disclosure Authorized Growth in Low-Income Countries Evolution, Prospects, and Policies Public Disclosure Authorized Rudi Steinbach Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions Global Practice July 2019 Policy Research Working Paper 8949 Abstract There are currently 31 countries classified as low income, less countries appear much more challenging. Compared to the than half the number in 2001. Rapid growth in low-income low-income countries in 2001 that became middle-income countries from 2001 to 2018 allowed many to progress to countries, today’s low-income countries are further below middle-income status, supported by the commodity price the middle-income country threshold and more often boom of 2001–11, debt relief under the Heavily Indebted fragile; their heavy reliance on agriculture makes them vul- Poor Country Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Ini- nerable to climate change and extreme weather events; and tiative, increased investment in human and physical capital, their scope to boost external trade is limited by geography. improved economic policy frameworks, and recoveries Coordinated and multi-pronged policy efforts are required from the deep recessions in transition economies during to address these challenges. the 1990s. However, the prospects for current low-income This paper is a product of the Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions Global Practice. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world. Policy Research Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://www.worldbank.org/prwp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Development Index—A New Development Indicator?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Trabold-Nübler, Harald Article — Digitized Version The human development index—A new development indicator? Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Trabold-Nübler, Harald (1991) : The human development index—A new development indicator?, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 26, Iss. 5, pp. 236-243, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02928996 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/140315 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS Harald Trabold-Nebler* The Human Development Index - A New Development Indicator? "Development" can be defined and measured in a great variety of ways. The human development index used by the United Nations Development Programme represents an attempt to place the emphasis on human welfare rather than on the progress of the national economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argentina Paradox: Microexplanations and Macropuzzles
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE ARGENTINA PARADOX: MICROEXPLANATIONS AND MACROPUZZLES Alan M. Taylor Working Paper 19924 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19924 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2014 Prepared for the conference “Exceptional Argentina” at Harvard University organized by Rafael Di Tella, Edward Glaeser, and Lucas Llach. I thank the organizers/editors, anonymous referees, and conference participants for useful comments and suggestions on this paper. All errors are mine. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Alan M. Taylor. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Argentina Paradox: Microexplanations and Macropuzzles Alan M. Taylor NBER Working Paper No. 19924 February 2014 JEL No. F43,N16,O11,O54,O57,P52 ABSTRACT The economic history of Argentina presents one of the most dramatic examples of divergence in the modern era. What happened and why? This paper reviews the wide range of competing explanations in the literature and argues that, setting aside deeper social and political determinants, the various economic mechanisms in play defy the idea of a monocausal explanation. Alan M. Taylor Department of Economics and Graduate School of Management University of California One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616-8578 and NBER [email protected] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • INCOME DISTRIBUTION and ECONOMIC GROWTH in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: an EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS by Allison Heyse
    INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS BY Allison Heyse Heyse 2 Abstract: Since the 1950’s and 1960’s, income inequality and its impact on the economy has frequently been studied using by numerous authors. Even though numerous studies on many aspects of the effects of income inequality have been completed, there are still many questions that remain. One of the lingering questions involves the nature of the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. Studies indicate conflicting conclusions about the relationship between income inequality and growth. This paper attempts to reevaluate income inequality data from particular countries and shed new light on the complex relationship between inequality and growth. The particular countries used in this study are classified as less developed countries or developing countries. Based on panel data estimation over the 1966 – 1990 time period, the empirical evidence will show that developing countries with higher income inequality do not grow at a slower rate than developing countries with a more equal income distribution. With a one point increase in income inequality, there is an associated .3% annual increase in real GDP per capita growth over the next five year period. CHAPTER 1: Introduction Over the last half century, a hot topic among economic analysts has been the possible impact of income inequality on the economy. One of the most important factors believed to be related to income inequality is the rate of economic growth. Understanding the relationship between these two economic variables is important because higher income inequality is often found in lower developed countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Argentine Exceptionalism
    Lat Am Econ Rev (2018) 27:1 DOI 10.1007/s40503-017-0055-4 INTRODUCTION Introduction to Argentine exceptionalism 1 1 2 Edward L. Glaeser • Rafael Di Tella • Lucas Llach Received: 25 September 2017 / Revised: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 27 October 2017 Ó The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication Abstract This article is an introduction to the special collection on Argentine Exceptionalism. First, we discuss why the case of Argentina is generally regarded as exceptional: the country was among the richest in the world at the beginning of the 20th century, but it gradually lost this place of privilege. We discuss that most explanations regarding the hypothesis of Argentine Exceptionalism fall into one or several of four categories. The first explanation is to challenge the exceptionalism hypothesis, either by arguing that the country was not so rich at the beginning of the 20th century or that it is not so poor now. The second explanation states that the country failed to generate growth supporting institutions despite its wealth, thus leading to a relative decline in its income level. The next explanation is that the country faced a series of adverse external shocks which disfavored what had been a successful growth model. Finally, scholars have also stated that exceptionalism is a consequence of poor policy choices, in particular a tendency towards state inter- vention and isolationism. Next, we introduce the remaining papers of the special collection and how they relate to the aforementioned hypothesis. Finally, we offer some concluding remarks regarding this article. Keywords Argentine exceptionalism Á Economic history JEL Classification N10 Á N16 D78 & Rafael Di Tella [email protected] 1 Harvard University and NBER, Cambridge, USA 2 Banco Central de la Repu´blica Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina 123 1 Page 2 of 22 Lat Am Econ Rev (2018) 27:1 1 Introduction Argentina began the 20th century as one of the wealthiest places on the planet.
    [Show full text]