DOCSLIB.ORG

Effect of Ni-Containing Catalysts on Pyrolysis Vapors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effect of Ni-Containing Catalysts on Pyrolysis Vapors catalysts Article Optimization of Charcoal Production Process from Woody Biomass Waste: Effect of Ni-Containing Catalysts on Pyrolysis Vapors Jon Solar * ID , Blanca Maria Caballero, Isabel De Marco ID , Alexander López-Urionabarrenechea and Naia Gastelu Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, School of Engineering of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] (B.M.C.); [email protected] (I.D.M.); [email protected] (A.L-U.); [email protected] (N.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-946-017-297 Received: 12 April 2018; Accepted: 28 April 2018; Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract: Woody biomass waste (Pinus radiata) coming from forestry activities has been pyrolyzed with the aim of obtaining charcoal and, at the same time, a hydrogen-rich gas fraction. The pyrolysis has been carried out in a laboratory scale continuous screw reactor, where carbonization takes place, connected to a vapor treatment reactor, at which the carbonization vapors are thermo-catalytically treated. Different peak temperatures have been studied in the carbonization process (500–900 ◦C), while the presence of different Ni-containing catalysts in the vapor treatment has been analyzed. Low temperature pyrolysis produces high liquid and solid yields, however, increasing the temperature progressively up to 900 ◦C drastically increases gas yield. The amount of nickel affects the vapors treatment phase, enhancing even further the production of interesting products such as hydrogen and reducing the generated liquids to very low yields. The gases obtained at very high temperatures ◦ (700–900 C) in the presence of Ni-containing catalysts are rich in H2 and CO, which makes them valuable for energy production, as hydrogen source, producer gas or reducing agent. Keywords: biomass waste; slow pyrolysis; charcoal; screw reactor; Ni-catalyst; hydrogen 1. Introduction The steel industry is one of the mayor contributors to CO2 emissions and, in consequence, to greenhouse gas effect. The World Steel Association published that in 2015, on average, 1.8 tons of CO2 were emitted for every tone of steel produced, which corresponds to approximately 9% of the world’s CO2 emissions [1,2]. Reducing coke and carbon consumption is the main way to minimize CO2 emissions from steelmaking, and one alternative to such fossil feedstock is biomass-derived charcoal. Charcoal has some advantages over the traditional carbonaceous raw materials, such as higher porosity and reactivity, and less ashes, sulfur and phosphorus in its composition [3–5], but amongst all, the neutral CO2 balance (“closed carbon loop”) is its most regarded characteristic. Charcoal, alongside bio-oil and gases, is the product of biomass pyrolysis reaction, which consists of the thermal breakdown of organic matter under the action of heat and in the absence of an oxidizing medium. The amount and quality of the three different fractions obtained during the pyrolysis of biomass depends on the raw materials [6–8] as well as the pyrolysis operating parameters, such as presence of catalyst [9,10], heating rate [11], peak temperature [12–14], residence time [13,15,16], pressure [17–19], and so forth [20,21]. Nonetheless, the production of charcoal through pyrolysis technology is not very widespread due to economic constraints, and is only substantially utilized Catalysts 2018, 8, 191; doi:10.3390/catal8050191 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Catalysts 2018, 8, 191 2 of 18 in countries which combine a reliable biomass supply and a steelmaking industrial fabric, such as Brazil [22]. Aiming to make the process of obtaining charcoal from biomass more sustainable and profitable, an essential aspect to investigate is the use of the derivate co-products, gas and liquids [23–25]. If charcoal production is carried out at very high temperatures (700–1000 ◦C) and slow heating rates (carbonization), the process yields more gas than liquid fraction, and the properties of the gas are more promising than those of the liquid fraction, which is mainly composed of tars and water [26]. Therefore, the objective of optimization of charcoal production must focus on maximizing the production of gas together with the reduction of the generated tars and water, in order to obtain a large quantity of clean gas with high added value, as it happens in gasification. Many studies [27–29] indicate that achieving complete removal of the tars only by heat treatment is very difficult; however, elimination of tars in biomass gasification processes through the use of catalysts at high temperatures is a widespread accepted technique. Therefore, the alternative that is intended to investigate in this paper is the combination of thermal and catalytic treatment, called catalytic cracking. As thermal cracking, catalytic cracking requires high temperatures; however, catalytic cracking is performed by an ionic mechanism (heterolytic breakdown), which allows to work at a lower temperature than conventional thermal cracking would require. Nickel-based catalysts are the most frequently used catalysts in the majority of the applications concerning biomass thermo-chemical processing [17,30–32]. There are many bibliographic references which demonstrate that Ni-catalysts promote tar cracking [33–36], improve the hydrogen gas yield [17,37] and present deoxygenation activity [38]. Consequently, this kind of catalyst has been used to enhance the properties of bio-oil [39], to eliminate pyrolysis tars [40] and in the reforming of pyrolysis vapors by using steam [41]. Previous experiments performed by the authors also showed the efficiency of Ni-catalysts to reduce tars and improve gas properties in batch carbonization [42]. Concerning supports, alumina is one of the most widespread supporting carrier of active metals [43] and it has been found that Ni/Al2O3 has greater activities than Ni over other supports [44–46]. In the present paper, carbonization of forestry wood waste has been carried out in a continuous auger reactor, and the influence of different nickel containing commercial catalysts (placed on a secondary tubular reactor to treat vapors) on the yield and the quality of liquid and gas products has been studied. As far as the authors are concerned, there is no publication dedicated to the optimization of the vapors generated in the processes of carbonization of residual biomass. Therefore, the goal of this work is to use catalysts to promote the yield and quality of carbonization gases by means of increasing the content of hydrogen, CO and methane, while reducing the share of pyrolysis liquids. 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Catalyst Characterization The catalyst used in the present work and all the relative information about the preparation of the experiments are described in Section 3.2. The textural characterization and metal content of all the fresh catalysts are presented in Table1. Table 1. Surface area, porosity and metal content of the catalysts. Composition (wt. %) 2 −1 Total Pore Average Pore BET (m g ) 3 −1 vol. (cm g ) Diam. (Å) Ni NiO K2O SiO2 SO3 Cr2O3 Support 18NiO 11.5 0.0602 206.7 - 18 1.8 0.1 0.1 - CaO/Al2O3 16NiO 29.0 0.1312 179.3 - 16 - 0.1 0.1 - CaO/Al2O3 44Ni 99.3 0.4040 162.8 44 - - 4.7 - 1.7 CaO/Al2O3 It can be observed that the pre-reduced 44Ni catalyst had clearly the highest surface area (99.3 m2 g−1), followed by the 16NiO catalyst (29.0 m2 g−1), while the 18NiO catalyst had a significantly Catalysts 2018, 8, 191 3 of 18 − lowerCatalysts surface 2018, 8, areax FOR (11.5 PEER m REVIEW2 g 1). Concerning pore volume, 44Ni, 16NiO and 18NiO catalysts showed3 of 18 a tendency similar to that observed in the BET surface values, whilst the opposite tendency was regardingregarding averageaverage pore pore diameter. diameter. The The 18NiO 18NiO catalyst catalyst presented presented low porelow pore volume volume with bigwith size big pores, size whilepores, the while 44Ni the had 44Ni higher had quantityhigher quantity of pores of and pores of smallerand of smaller size (at size average). (at average). In addition In addition to nickel, to thenickel, 18NiO the catalyst 18NiO presentscatalyst apresents small amount a small of amount potassium of potassium oxide (1.8 wt.oxide % K(1.82O) wt.% and both K2O) 18NiO and both and 16NiO18NiO presentand 16NiO very smallpresent quantities very small of SiOquantities2 and SO of3, whereasSiO2 and 44Ni SO3, haswhereas a significant 44Ni has amount a significant of SiO2 (amount4.7 wt. % of) andSiO2 a (4.7 small wt.%) amount and ofa Crsmall2O3 amount(1.7 wt. of %). Cr All2O3 the (1.7 catalysts wt.%). All used the in catalysts the experiments used in arethe supportedexperiments over are alumina supported modified over alumina with calcium modified oxide. with calcium oxide. AsAs aa generalgeneral rule,rule, thethe greatergreater thethe surfacesurface areaarea thethe higherhigher thethe catalystcatalyst activity might be expected. However,However, since since large large molecules molecules are normallyare normally generated generated from pyrolysisfrom pyrolysis primary primary reactions, reactions, the blockage the ofblockage small pores of small could pores take could place, havingtake place, a negative having effecta negative in the activity.effect in However,the activity. the However, catalyst used the incatalyst this work, used thoughin this work, they present though different they present average different pore diameter,average pore the differencediameter, the does difference not seem does big enoughnot seem to big be consideredenough to abe very considered influential a very parameter. influential On theparameter. other hand, On the considering other hand, that considering the surface areathat ofthe the surface 16NiO area catalyst of the is almost16NiO threecatalyst times is almost the area three of the times 18NiO the catalyst, area of athe conclusion 18NiO catalyst, that can a beconclusion reached isthat the can lower be dispersionreached is ofthe the lower metal dispersion particles onof the surfacemetal particles of the 18NiO on the catalyst, surface whichof the will18NiO arguably catalyst, affect which the performancewill arguably of theaffect catalyst.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wood and Charcoal Anatomy of Eight Charcoal- Producing Wood Species in Central Sudan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KhartoumSpace Wood and Charcoal Anatomy of Eight Charcoal- producing Wood Species in Central Sudan By Hiat Mohammedain Mustafa Hagar B.Sc. (Honours-2002) Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies University of Sinnar A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry (Wood Science) at University of Khartoum Supervisor Dr. Abdelazim Yassin Abdelgadir Department of Forest Products and Industries Faculty of Forestry April 2010 اﻵﻳﺔ اﻵﻳﺔ ﭧ ﭨ ﮋ ﻬ ے ﮯ ۓ ﮱ ڭ ﯔ ﯕ ﯖ ۇ ﯘ ژ ﺻﺪق اﷲ اﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺳﻮرة (ﻳﺲ: اﻵﻳﺔ 80) i DEDICATION To the Soul of my Father ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Praise and thanks are due to Allah who had given me the power and support till completing this study. I am grateful and indebted to my supervisor Dr. Abdelazim Yassin Abdelgadir for his valuable guidance and advice throughout this study and deep thanks are due to Dr. Abdelatif Altyib and Dr. Ashraf Mohamed Ahmed for their supportive comments that led to a successful completion of the research. I would like to express my gratitude to El fasher University that give me this chance and my Department in the forestry of Environment and Natural Resource. I am greatly to Agriculture Engineer. Ali Alnour for his assistance in the sample collection at Alnoor Forest. Also I am grateful to technician Gamil Alla Gumaa for helping me in slide preparation, I am also very thankful to my friend Entisar Abdelrahman Ali who help me typing this work and finally thanks to my family Mother, brother, sister and all members of my family.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status and Potential of Tire Pyrolysis Oil Production As an Alternative Fuel in Developing Countries
    sustainability Review Current Status and Potential of Tire Pyrolysis Oil Production as an Alternative Fuel in Developing Countries Haseeb Yaqoob 1,2, Yew Heng Teoh 1,* , Farooq Sher 3,4,* , Muhammad Ahmad Jamil 5, Daniyal Murtaza 2, Mansour Al Qubeissi 3,4 , Mehtab UI Hassan 2 and M. A. Mujtaba 6 1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal, Penang 14300, Malaysia; [email protected] 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan; [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (M.U.H.) 3 School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Environmental and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] 4 Institute for Future Transport and Cities, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK 5 Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] 6 Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Campus Lahore, University of Engineering and Technology, Punjab 39161, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.H.T.); [email protected] or [email protected] (F.S.) Abstract: Energy is essential for the nature of life and the development of countries. The main demand for the 21st century is to fulfill growing energy needs. Pakistan, through the use of fossil fuels, Citation: Yaqoob, H.; Teoh, Y.H.; meets energy demands. There is pressure on the economy of the country due to the massive reliance Sher, F.; Jamil, M.A.; Murtaza, D.; Al on fossil fuels, and this tendency is influenced by various environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Activated Carbon, Biochar and Charcoal: Linkages and Synergies Across Pyrogenic Carbon’S Abcs
    water Review Activated Carbon, Biochar and Charcoal: Linkages and Synergies across Pyrogenic Carbon’s ABCs Nikolas Hagemann 1,* ID , Kurt Spokas 2 ID , Hans-Peter Schmidt 3 ID , Ralf Kägi 4, Marc Anton Böhler 5 and Thomas D. Bucheli 1 1 Agroscope, Environmental Analytics, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Soil and Water Management Unit, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA; [email protected] 3 Ithaka Institute, Ancienne Eglise 9, CH-1974 Arbaz, Switzerland; [email protected] 4 Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Department Process Engineering, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; [email protected] 5 Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Application and Development, Department Process Engineering, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-58-462-1074 Received: 11 January 2018; Accepted: 1 February 2018; Published: 9 February 2018 Abstract: Biochar and activated carbon, both carbonaceous pyrogenic materials, are important products for environmental technology and intensively studied for a multitude of purposes. A strict distinction between these materials is not always possible, and also a generally accepted terminology is lacking. However, research on both materials is increasingly overlapping: sorption and remediation are the domain of activated carbon, which nowadays is also addressed by studies on biochar. Thus, awareness of both fields of research and knowledge about the distinction of biochar and activated carbon is necessary for designing novel research on pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Here, we describe the dividing ranges and common grounds of biochar, activated carbon and other pyrogenic carbonaceous materials such as charcoal based on their history, definition and production technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Oil Commercialization Plan
    BIO-OIL COMMERCIALIZATION PLAN Bio-Oil Commercialization Plan Prepared for the NH Office of Energy and Planning by Cole Hill Associates 32 Dyke Road PO Box 523 Sugar Hill, NH 03585-5000 (603) 823-5109 July 2004 This material was prepared with financial support from the New Hampshire Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Services (ECS) and the New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development (DRED). However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of Cole Hill Associates and do not necessarily reflect the views of ECS (now the NH Office of Energy and Planning) or DRED and do not constitute an endorsement of products or services mentioned. Since this Plan was produced, Cole Hill Associates has relocated: Gerald W. Stewart Cole Hill Associates 4 St. Andrews Lane Bluffton, SC 29909 Telephone/Fax (843) 705-5924 Cell Phone (843) 368-5661 Cole Hill Associates Page 56 July 2004 BIO-OIL COMMERCIALIZATION PLAN Introduction I. Commercialization Plan Summary† A. There is a need for an expanded use of low-grade wood chips in the North Country of New Hampshire.1a,1b,2 B. One alternative is the conversion of wood chips into bio-oil, an environmentally friendly, renewable energy source. C. The objective of this study is to evaluate the economic viability of locating a bio-oil facility in New Hampshire as an alternative use of wood chips, and to inform interested parties as to the current state of bio-oil technology. Contractual requirements for developing this commercialization plan specifically forbid the selection of and /or bias towards any one producer or process.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Estimating Profitability of Two Biochar Production Scenarios
    Estimating Profitability of Two Biochar Production Scenarios: Slow Pyrolysis vs. Fast Pyrolysis Tristan R. Brown1 *, Mark M. Wright2, 3, and Robert C. Brown2, 3 Iowa State University 1Biobased Industry Center 2Department of Mechanical Engineering 3Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies * [email protected] Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011 Tel: (515) 460-0183 Fax: (515) 294-6336 ABSTRACT We estimate the profitability of producing biochar from crop residue (corn stover) for two scenarios. The first employs slow pyrolysis to generate biochar and pyrolysis gas and has the advantage of high yields of char (as much as 40 wt-%) but the disadvantage of producing a relatively low-value energy product (pyrolysis gas of modest heating value). The second scenario employs fast pyrolysis to maximize production of bio-oil with biochar and pyrolysis gas as lower-yielding co-products. The fast pyrolysis scenario produces a substantially higher value energy product than slow pyrolysis but at the cost of higher capital investment. We calculate the internal rate of return (IRR) for each scenario as functions of cost of feedstock and projected revenues for the pyrolysis facility. The assumed price range for delivered biomass feedstock is $0 to $83 per metric ton. The assumed carbon offset value for biochar ranges from $20 per metric ton of biochar in 2015 to $60 in 2030. The slow pyrolysis scenario in 2015 is not profitable at an assumed feedstock cost of $83 per metric ton. The fast pyrolysis scenario in 2015 yields 15% IRR with the same feedstock cost because gasoline refined from the bio-oil provides revenues of $2.96 per gallon gasoline equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) Project Peer Review
    2013 DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) Project Peer Review Catalytic Conversion to Liquid Hydrocarbons from Pyrolysis Oil and Syngas May 20, 2013 Bio-Oil Technology Area Review Fei Yu and Philip H. Steele Sustainable Energy Research Center (SERC) Mississippi State University (MSU) *On many slides, the slide notes section has important additional information* This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Goal/Objective Statement • MSU pyrolysis/syngas program goals: – Develop hydrocarbon and biodiesel fuels from raw bio-oil produced from southern pine and agricultural products and residues; develop auger reactor designs that can provide test quantities of raw bio-oil; test designs at pilot plant scale – Develop technologies for biomass gasification and catalytic conversion of cleaned syngas to hydrocarbon biofuels. This is accomplished through the design and optimization of syngas-to-hydrocarbons pilot plant, including biomass gasification, syngas cleanup, syngas upgrading as well as new catalyst material development. • The MSU pyrolysis/syngas program goals support the development of technologies for conversion of forest resources into cost-competitive liquid fuels, such as renewable gasoline, jet fuel and diesel. Technologies to be tested at laboratory (and pilot scale in FY14). 2 Project Quad Chart Overview Timeline Barriers •Project start date: June 1, 2006 • Barriers addressed •Project end date: June 30, 2014 • Pyrolysis •Percent complete: – Tt-A Feeding dry biomass SERC phase I: 100% – TT-G Fuel synthesis and SERC phase II: 100% upgrading SERC phase III: 90% SERC phase IV: 40% • Syngas – Tt.-F. Syngas Cleanup and Conditioning Budget • Total project funding – Tt-G. Fuels Catalyst Development - DOE share: $15,587,449 - Contractor share: $4,414,254 Partners & Roles • Funding received in FY 2011 (DOE & cost share): Pyrolysis $4,597,536 •Piedmont Bio-Products: licensee • Funding in FY 2012 (DOE & cost share): $4,922,748 Syngas • ARRA Funding: $0 •MS Choctaw Lignite LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Preservation Manual Wood Preservation Manual
    Wood preservation manual Wood preservation manual Mechanical Wood Products Branch Forest I ndustries Division FAD Forestry Department The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-34 ISBN 92-5-102470-7 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAD 1986 - i - CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Background and the purpose of the manual CHAPTER 2 WHAT IS PRESERVATION? 2 Importance, benefits and economics of wood preservation, protective measures, protection by specification, protection by design detailing CHAPTER 3 NATURE OF WOOD 13 Wood structure, classes of wood, moisture content and natural durability CHAPTER 4 DECAY HAZARDS 21 Fungi, insects, borers, weathering, fire CHAPTER 5 WOOD PRESERVATIVES 32 Properties, ideal preservative, types of preservatives, tar oils,
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis Oils: Characterization, Stability Analysis, and Catalytic Upgrading to Fuels and Chemicals
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 2-2011 Pyrolysis Oils: Characterization, Stability Analysis, and Catalytic Upgrading to Fuels and Chemicals Tushar Vispute University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Vispute, Tushar, "Pyrolysis Oils: Characterization, Stability Analysis, and Catalytic Upgrading to Fuels and Chemicals" (2011). Open Access Dissertations. 349. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/349 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PYROLYSIS OILS: CHARACTERIZATION, STABILITY ANALYSIS, AND CATALYTIC UPGRADING TO FUELS AND CHEMICALS A Dissertation Presented by TUSHAR P. VISPUTE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2011 Chemical Engineering © Copyright by Tushar P. Vispute 2011 All Rights Reserved PYROLYSIS OILS: CHARACTERIZATION, STABILITY ANALYSIS, AND CATALYTIC UPGRADING TO FUELS AND CHEMICALS A Dissertation Presented by TUSHAR P. VISPUTE Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ George W. Huber, Chair _______________________________________ W. Curt Conner, Member _______________________________________ Scott M. Auerbach, Member ____________________________________ T. J. (Lakis) Mountziaris, Department Head Chemical Engineering ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to deeply acknowledge the help and support of my advisor Prof. George W. Huber on this fascinating research program. George is an excellent mentor and provides an outstanding research environment in the group for graduate students to work and develop.
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium and Phosphorus Have No Effect on Severity of Charcoal Rot of Soybean
    Can. J. Plant Pathol., 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2016.1168869 Disease control/Moyens de lutte Potassium and phosphorus have no effect on severity of charcoal rot of soybean ALEMU MENGISTU1, XINHUA YIN2, NACER BELLALOUI3, ANGELA M. McCLURE2, DON D. TYLER4 AND KRISHNA N. REDDY5 1Crop Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Jackson, TN, 38301, USA 2Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN, 38301, USA 3Crop Genetics Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA 4Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN, 38301, USA 5Crop Production Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA (Accepted 17 March 2016) Abstract: Charcoal rot of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] caused by Macrophomina phaseolina is a disease of economic significance throughout the world. The effects of potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer on disease development are unknown. Therefore, two separate trials were conducted in the field during 2008, 2009 and 2010 at Jackson and Milan, TN, USA to evaluate the effects of K and P on severity of −1 −1 charcoal rot. Rates of K (0, 45, 90, 134 and 179 kg K2Oha ) and P (0, 22, 45, 67 and 90 kg P2O5 ha ) were used, with a sixth rate ranging from 0–22 for P and 0–37 for K equal to the recommended K or P fertilizer application based on annual soil testing. The colony forming units of M. phaseolina in soil indicated no significant response for any P treatments in five of six location-by-year and for K applications in all six location-by-year environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis Oil and Upgrading
    PNNL-22133 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Production of Gasoline and Diesel from Biomass via Fast Pyrolysis, Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking: 2011 State of Technology and Projections to 2017 SB Jones JL Male February 2012 PNNL-22133 Production of Gasoline and Diesel from Biomass via Fast Pyrolysis, Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking: 2011 State of Technology and Projections to 2017 SB Jones JL Male February 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 State of Technology for FY2011 ................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Feedstock and Feedstock Preparation ................................................................................ 3 2.2 Fast Pyrolysis ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Upgrading ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Hydrocracking .................................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Hydrogen Generation ......................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Metallurgical Charcoal from Biomass Pyrolysis: Pilot-Scale Experiment
    22nd International Symposium on Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis Kyoto, 2018 Production of metallurgical charcoal from biomass pyrolysis: pilot-scale experiment a a b b a A. Phounglamcheik *, R. Pitchot , A. Andefors , N. Norberg , and K. Umeki * corresponding author: [email protected] a Division of Energy Science, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden b Future Eco North Sweden AB, SE-961 50 Boden, Sweden Replacement of fossil coal with biomass fuel is a key strategy to decrease CO2 emission in the Nordic industry. Charcoal produced from pyrolysis of forest residue is expected for the application in metallurgical process. Quality of charcoal can reach the requirement, i.e. high carbon content, low volatile, low ash content, and high heating value at high pyrolysis temperature. Nevertheless, to produce charcoal with such high quality, the products distribution may shift toward pyrolysis oil and gas. We have suggested to increase the charcoal yield while keeping its quality by adsorbing large molecule fractions of pyrolysis oil on the pore structure of charcoal produced at relatively high temperature (>600 °C). This study aims at demonstrating the suggested pyrolysis process to produce metallurgical charcoal with high efficiency. The effect of various operation parameters was investigated in batch operations with ca. 130 kg dry wood chips for this purpose. The experiment was conducted in a pilot-scale auger-type pyrolysis reactor. Two cylindrical pipes with screw conveyers and external heating/cooling media are connected for pyrolysis and vapor adsorption. In the pyrolysis reactor, woodchips are heated indirectly with flue gas generated from a propane burner. In the vapor adsorption pipe, charcoal and volatiles are cooled down and part of pyrolysis volatile is condensed and absorbed on the surface of charcoal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Characterization of Pyrolysis Oil from Softwood Barks
    polymers Article A Comprehensive Characterization of Pyrolysis Oil from Softwood Barks Haoxi Ben 1,*, Fengze Wu 1, Zhihong Wu 1 , Guangting Han 2,3, Wei Jiang 2,3 and Arthur J. Ragauskas 4,5 1 Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China 2 Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China 3 State Key Laboratory of Bio-Fibers and Eco-Textiles, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China 4 Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA 5 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-188-5107-5775 Received: 17 July 2019; Accepted: 19 August 2019; Published: 23 August 2019 Abstract: Pyrolysis of raw pine bark, pine, and Douglas-Fir bark was examined. The pyrolysis oil yields of raw pine bark, pine, and Douglas-Fir bark at 500 ◦C were 29.18%, 26.67%, and 26.65%, respectively. Both energy densification ratios (1.32–1.56) and energy yields (48.40–54.31%) of char are higher than pyrolysis oils (energy densification ratios: 1.13–1.19, energy yields: 30.16–34.42%). The pyrolysis oils have higher heating values (~25 MJ/kg) than bio-oils (~20 MJ/kg) from wood and agricultural residues, and the higher heating values of char (~31 MJ/kg) are comparable to that of many commercial coals. The elemental analysis indicated that the lower O/C value and higher H/C value represent a more valuable source of energy for pyrolysis oils than biomass.
    [Show full text]