DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament 2014-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament 2014-2019 European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE_PV(2016)0704_1 MINUTES Extraordinary meeting of 4 July 2016, 19.00 - 20.00 STRASBOURG The meeting opened at 19.04 on Monday, 4 July 2016, with Claude Moraes (Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of agenda LIBE_OJ (2016)0704_1 The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair's announcements Interpretation in Croatian, Czech, Maltese, Latvian, Lithuanian, Danish, Estonian, Slovene and Gaelic was not available for this extraordinary meeting. 3. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 21-22 December 2015 PE 574.992v01–00 9 May 2015 PE 582.341v01–00 The above-mentioned minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 4. European Border and Coast Guard LIBE/8/05348 ***I 2015/0310(COD) COM(2015)0671 – C8-0408/2015 Rapporteur: Artis Pabriks (PPE) Responsible: LIBE Opinions: AFET – Javier Nart (ALDE) AD – PE580.484v04-00 AM – PE580.712v02-00 BUDG – Eider Gardiazabal Rubial AD – PE578.760v02-00 (S&D) AM – PE580.581v01-00 TRAN – Decision: no opinion PA – PE580.429v01-00 AM – PE580.688v01-00 PV\1100053EN.docx PE585.733v01-00 EN United in diversity EN PECH – Alain Cadec (PPE) AD – PE578.545v02-00 AM – PE578.841v01-00 Vote on the text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations The rapporteur Artis Pabriks (PPE) took the floor. The text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations was adopted with 38 votes in favour, 9 against and 2 abstentions. 5. Combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism LIBE/8/05240 ***I 2015/0281(COD) COM(2015)0625 – C8-0386/2015 Rapporteur: Monika Hohlmeier (PPE) PR – PE577.046v01-00 AM – PE580.626v01-00 AM – PE580.621v01-00 Responsible: LIBE Adoption of draft report Vote on the opening of interinstitutional negotiations and on the composition of the negotiating team The draft report was adopted with 41 votes in favour, 4 against and 10 abstentions. The following amendments were adopted: AMs 28, 205, COMP 11, COMP 12, 213, 218, 219, 222, 225, 227, 230, 231, 232, 233, 239, 237, 235, 241, 243, COMP 5, COMP 6 (1st and 2nd part), 261, 264, COMP 14 (1st and 2nd part), COMP 15 (first part), COMP 7, COMP 13, 35, COMP 2, COMP 4 (1st and 2nd part), 302, 307, 38, 39, COMP 8, 44, 340, 342, 344, 45, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 358, COMP 9, 364, 371, 372, 397, 413, 419, 424, 427, 428, 429, 431, 433, 430, 56, 57, 58, 59, COMP 1, 4, 65, 68, 73, 74, 76, 77, COMP 3, 96, 116, 144, 14, COMP 10, 182, 185, 186, 199, 201, 202. The following amendments were rejected: AMs 207, 209, 211, 210, 212 (1st and 2nd part), 214, 215, 216, 223, 224, 226, 228, 229, 29, 30, 234, 262, 263, 266, 267, 268, COMP 15 (2nd part), 289, 291, 303, 305, 41, 337, 341, 343, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 357, 359, 376, 422, 423, 425, 426, 435, 437, 438, 60, 69, 70, 67, 80, 88, 90, 93, 98, 113, 133, 13, 138, 140, 142, 139, 141, 146, 148, 149, 151, 200, 153, 183, 184, 196, 197, 198. All other amendments were fallen or withdrawn. The mandate for negotiations was adopted with 47 votes in favour, 5 votes against and 4 abstentions. *** End of electronic vote *** PE585.733v01-00 2/36 PV\1100053EN.docx EN 6. Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Georgia) LIBE/8/05996 ***I 2016/0075(COD) COM(2016)0142 – C8-0113/2016 Rapporteur: Mariya Gabriel (PPE) PR – PE584.100v01-00 Responsible: LIBE Opinions: AFET – Andrejs Mamikins (S&D) PA – PE584.122v01-00 AM – PE585.464v01-00 Consideration of a draft report Decision on deadline for tabling amendments Deadline for tabling amendments: 14 July 2016, 12.00 The rapporteur Mariya Gabriel (PPE) presented her report. The following Members took the floor: Tanja Fajon (S&D), Nathalie Griesbeck (ALDE shadow rapporteur), Bodil Valero (Greens/ALE shadow rapporteur), Michał Boni (EPP) and Marie-Christine Vergiat (GUE/NGL shadow rapporteur). 7. Any other business None. 8. Next meetings 7 July 2016, 10.30 – 12.00 (Strasbourg) 11 July 2016, 15.00 – 18.30 (Brussels) 12 July 2016, 9.00 – 12.30 and 15.00 – 18.30 (Brussels) The meeting ended at 20.12. In camera 9. Coordinators’ meeting PV\1100053EN.docx 3/36 PE585.733v01-00 EN Results of roll-call votes Contents 1. European Border and Coast Guard, 2015/0310(COD), Rapporteur Artis Pabriks (PPE) ...... 6 1.1. Final vote ................................................................................................................. 6 2. Combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism, 2015/0281(COD), Rapporteur Monika Hohlmeier (PPE) ....................... 6 2.1. Final vote ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Mandate .................................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Compromise Amendment 11 ................................................................................... 8 2.4. Compromise Amendment 12 ................................................................................... 8 2.5. Amendment 223 ....................................................................................................... 9 2.6. Amendment 228 ....................................................................................................... 9 2.7. Amendment 229 ..................................................................................................... 10 2.8. Amendment 29 ....................................................................................................... 11 2.9. Amendment 231 ..................................................................................................... 11 2.10. Amendment 232 ................................................................................................. 12 2.11. Amendment 30 ................................................................................................... 13 2.12. Amendment 239 ................................................................................................. 13 2.13. Amendments 235 & 237 .................................................................................... 14 2.14. Compromise Amendment 5 ............................................................................... 15 2.15. Compromise Amendment 6 First Part ................................................................ 15 2.16. Compromise Amendment 6 Second Part ........................................................... 16 2.17. Compromise Amendment 14 First Part .............................................................. 17 2.18. Compromise Amendment 14 Second Part ......................................................... 17 2.19. Compromise Amendment 15 First Part .............................................................. 18 2.20. Compromise Amendment 15 Second Part ......................................................... 19 2.21. Compromise Amendment 7 ............................................................................... 20 2.22. Compromise Amendment 13 ............................................................................. 20 2.23. Amendment 289 ................................................................................................. 21 2.24. Compromise Amendment 2 ............................................................................... 23 2.25. Compromise Amendment 4 First Part ................................................................ 23 2.26. Compromise Amendment 4 Second Part ........................................................... 24 2.27. Amendment 41 ................................................................................................... 25 2.28. Compromise Amendment 8 ............................................................................... 25 2.29. Compromise Amendment 9 ............................................................................... 26 2.30. Amendment 371 ................................................................................................. 27 2.31. Amendments 413 & 419 .................................................................................... 27 2.32. Amendment 438 ................................................................................................. 28 2.33. Compromise Amendment 1 ............................................................................... 29 2.34. Amendment 80 ................................................................................................... 29 2.35. Compromise Amendment 3 ............................................................................... 30 2.36. Compromise Amendment 10 ............................................................................. 31 2.37. Amendment 291 ................................................................................................. 31 PE585.733v01-00 4/36 PV\1100053EN.docx EN Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention PV\1100053EN.docx 5/36 PE585.733v01-00 EN 1. European Border and Coast Guard, 2015/0310(COD), Rapporteur Artis Pabriks (PPE) 1.1. Final vote 38 + ALDE Gérard Deprez, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sophia in 't Veld, Petr Ježek, Cecilia Wikström ECR Timothy Kirkhope, Helga Stevens, Geoffrey Van Orden PPE Andrea Bocskor, Michał Boni, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Pál Csáky, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Mariya Gabriel, Kinga Gál, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Barbara Kudrycka, Roberta Metsola, Alessandra Mussolini, József Nagy, Artis Pabriks, Csaba
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rezultate Izbora Članova U Europski Parlament
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNO IZBORNO POVJERENSTVO REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE KLASA: 013-08/19-01/70 URBROJ: 507-02/01-19-1 Zagreb, 27. svibnja 2019. Na osnovi članaka 56. i 57. Zakona o izboru članova u Europski parlament iz Republike Hrvatske ("Narodne novine", broj 92/10, 23/13 i 143/13, dalje: Zakon) Državno izborno povjerenstvo Republike Hrvatske, utvrdilo je i objavljuje REZULTATE IZBORA ČLANOVA U EUROPSKI PARLAMENT IZ REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE PROVEDENIH 26. SVIBNJA 2019. GODINE I. Od ukupno 3.696.907 birača, glasovalo je (prema glasačkim listićima) 1.103.551 birača, odnosno 29,85%. Važećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 1.073.954, odnosno 97,32%. Nevažećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 29.597, odnosno 2,68%. II. Pojedine kandidacijske liste i kandidati dobili su sljedeći broj glasova: 1. HRVATSKA DEMOKRATSKA ZAJEDNICA - HDZ 244.076 glasova 22,72% 1. KARLO RESSLER 52.859 glasova 21,65% 2. DUBRAVKA ŠUICA 31.791 glasova 13,02% 3. TOMISLAV SOKOL 4.573 glasova 1,87% 4. ŽELJANA ZOVKO 9.861 glasova 4,04% 5. SUNČANA GLAVAK 9.599 glasova 3,93% 6. MARIJANA BALIĆ 7.365 glasova 3,01% 7. GORAN PAUK 7.824 glasova 3,20% 8. NIKOLINA BRNJAC 2.198 glasova 0,90% 9. STJEPAN RIBIĆ 4.359 glasova 1,78% 10. DOMAGOJ MAROEVIĆ 6.974 glasova 2,85% 11. DANIJEL MARUŠIĆ 9.747 glasova 3,99% 12. STJEPAN ADANIĆ 4.146 glasova 1,69% 2. SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA PARTIJA HRVATSKE - SDP 200.976 glasova 18,71% 1. TONINO PICULA 50.921 glasova 25,33% 2. BILJANA BORZAN 64.736 glasova 32,21% 3. PREDRAG FRED MATIĆ 13.371 glasova 6,65% 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-001744/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Kim Van Sparrentak (Verts/ALE), Chiara Gemma (NI), José Gusmão (The Left), Jarosław Duda (PPE), Biljana Borzan (S&D), Rosanna Conte (ID), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Estrella Durá Ferrandis (S&D), Loucas Fourlas (PPE), Radka Maxová (S&D), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Ádám Kósa (NI), Mónica Silvana González (S&D), Stelios Kympouropoulos (PPE), Milan Brglez (S&D), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Katrin Langensiepen (Verts/ALE) Subject: Deinstitutionalisation of support services for persons with disabilities On 2 October 2015, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities published its concluding observations on the initial report of the European Union on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The committee raised concerns that across the EU, persons with disabilities still live in institutions rather than in their local communities, while one of the main purposes of the CRPD, envisaged in Articles 1 and 19, is to guarantee all persons with disabilities the right to live independently. The committee noted that the European Structural and Investment Funds continue to be used in Member States to maintain residential institutions or to invest in new residential settings that remain institutional in their way of functioning. The committee recommended that the EU stop allowing such investments to continue and instead invest ambitiously in the deinstitutionalisation process. In the light of the above: 1. What concrete steps has the Commission taken to suspend, withdraw or recover payments used for the expansion or redevelopment of institutional care? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on International Trade 2020/2071(INI) 18.5.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 69 Draft opinion Andrey Kovatchev (PE650.551v01-00) Shortage of medicines - how to address an emerging problem (2020/2071(INI)) AM\1205208EN.docx PE652.313v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE652.313v01-00 2/37 AM\1205208EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Tiziana Beghin Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic 1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed in the starkest possible terms has revealed in the starkest possible terms the vital role played by functioning global the vital role played by functioning global supply chains for medical products, and in supply chains for medical products, and in particular for medicines; emphasises that particular for medicines and treatments; an open, rules-based trading system is emphasises that an open, transparent, fundamental to ensuring the global rules-based trading system is fundamental availability of medicines; to ensuring the global availability of medicines and guaranteeing an easy distribution and use; Or. en Amendment 2 Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Agnes Jongerius, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Costas Mavrides Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic 1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed in the starkest possible terms has revealed in the starkest possible terms the vital role played by functioning global the vital role played by functioning global supply chains for medical products, and in supply chains for medical products, and in particular for medicines; emphasises that particular for medicines; emphasises that an open, rules-based trading system is the implementation of an open, rules- fundamental to ensuring the global based trading system is fundamental to availability of medicines; ensuring the global availability of medicines and that our vulnerability is not repeated in future emergencies; Or.
    [Show full text]
  • (EU) and WHO/Europe Member States to Take Immediate Action Towards Fulfilling the Ambitious Goal of Eliminating Cervical Cancer As a Public Health Problem.1
    JOINT STATEMENT Priorities for Eliminating Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem in Europe <The Joint Signatories> call for all European Union (EU) and WHO/Europe member states to take immediate action towards fulfilling the ambitious goal of eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem.1 On 17 November 2020, the WHO formally launched the first-ever global effort to accelerate the elimination of a specific cancer type (1). Cervical cancer is an almost entirely preventable cancer thanks to prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and screening and treatment of cervical precancers (2).2 Despite the availability of several highly effective tools for preventing and controlling cervical cancer, in 2020 alone, more than 341,000 women worldwide were estimated to have died due to this cancer (3). Within the EU-27 member states, 1 The WHO global strategy for the elimination of cervical cancer sets a threshold for elimination of an age- adjusted incidence rate of <4 per 100,000 per year. 2 For further details, please consult the WHO factsheet on human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-and-cervical-cancer. approximately 33,000 women and their families receive a diagnosis of cervical cancer and 15,000 women lose their lives annually due to this disease with associated social and economic losses to families, communities and economies (4). With an increasing incidence over time (5), the burden of cervical cancer falls disproportionately on women and families in Eastern Europe and economically and socially vulnerable communities within countries. Nevertheless, all countries must take action to improve cervical cancer control.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Industry Call for an EU Approach to Packaging Waste Labelling
    To: Frans Timmermans, Executive Vice-President in charge of the European Green Deal Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market Didier Reynders, Commissioner for Justice Virginijus Sinkevičius, Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries 24 June 2021 Joint industry call for an EU approach to packaging waste labelling Dear Executive Vice-President Timmermans, Dear Commissioner Breton, Dear Commissioner Reynders, Dear Commissioner Sinkevičius, The undersigned organisations call on the Commission to take urgent action to ensure a common approach for packaging waste-sorting labelling to preserve the free movement of goods within the EU and underpin sustainability measures. As representatives of the packaging industry and consumer product manufacturers, we fully endorse the need for improved waste collection and sorting to support the transition towards a circular economy. Providing relevant and consistent information to consumers on how to properly dispose of both the products and their packaging is essential to enhance collection rates and improve the quality of the material collected. However, in the course of the last year we have been confronted with a concerning trend of divergent national packaging labelling and information requirements. This is not only counter to the work underway at EU level of moving towards greater harmonisation of waste collection and sorting, but it is inevitably resulting in major Single Market disruptions and, in turns, undermining Europe’s sustainability goals. These national labelling and information requirements force companies to create several iterations of their packaging to comply with them or to use stickers to add or cover certain markings. In addition to costs and operational impacts on production lines, these national measures can also have a negative impact on the size of packaging and its recyclability and can further confuse consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • 071 Letter to EP MP
    اﻷﻣم اﻟﻣﺗﺣدة UNITED NATIONS United Nations Support Mission In Libya ﺑﻌﺛﺔ اﻷﻣم اﻟﻣﺗﺣدة ﻟﻠدﻋم ﻓﻲ ﻟﯾﺑﯾﺎ UNSMIL/OSRSG/2015/071 5 May 2015 Distinguished Members of the European Parliament, I would like to thank you for your letter dated 16 April 2015 and for your words of support to the United Nations facilitated dialogue process. I am equally concerned at the ongoing migration crisis in the Mediterranean, which is claiming the lives of vulnerable people escaping war, poverty and persecution. I also share your view that the current situation of chaos and instability in Libya is contributing to this phenomenon and that it is essential to use the opportunity of the ongoing Libyan dialogue process to highlight this issue and contribute to its resolution. I would like to inform you that the current draft agreement, which is under consideration by the parties, includes specific language on human trafficking and irregular migration, and that I regularly highlight with our Libyan interlocutors the responsibility of Libyan institutions and political actors in combatting human trafficking and reducing the loss of life on Libya's borders. Once again I would like to reassure you of the United Nations and my own personal commitment to do our utmost to help Libya tackle the problem of human trafficking and illegal migration in full respect of international law. Yours sincerely, Bernardino Leon Gross Special Representative of the Secretary-General Head of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya Honorable Members of the European Parliament (See enclosed list) European Parliament Brussels Belgium اﻷﻣم اﻟﻣﺗﺣدة UNITED NATIONS United Nations Support Mission In Libya ﺑﻌﺛﺔ اﻷﻣم اﻟﻣﺗﺣدة ﻟﻠدﻋم ﻓﻲ ﻟﯾﺑﯾﺎ UNSMIL/OSRSG/2015/071 Her Excellency Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections Why Vote? English
    Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Croatia Results of the 26 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 Croatian Democratic EPP 22.72% 4 Union - HDZ Social Democratic Party S&D 18.71% 3 of Croatia - SDP Coalition Sovereign ECR 8.51% 1 Croatian Mislav Kolakušić's list 7.89% 1 Human Shield 5.66% 1 Amsterdam Coalition Renew Europe 5.20% 1 Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Karlo Ressler Croatian Democratic Union EPP Dubravka Šuica Croatian Democratic Union EPP Tomislav Sokol Croatian Democratic Union EPP Željana Zovko Croatian Democratic Union EPP Tonino Picula Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Biljana Borzan Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Predrag Fred Matić Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Valter Flego Amsterdam coalition Renew Europe Ruzo Tomašić Croation Sovereigns ECR Mislav Kolakušić Mislav Kolakušić's list Ivan Vilibor Sincic Human Shield Lists for the elections on 26 May Affiliation of a political Leading Name of party Translation Internet site Programme party or candidate group HDZ, Hrvatska Croatian Democratic EPP Karlo hdz.hr Programme Demokratska zajednica Union - HDZ Ressler HSS, Hrvatska seljacka Croatian Farmers’ Party - EPP Valter Flego hss.hr stranka HSS SDP, Socijaldemokratska Social Democratic Party of S&D Mirando sdp.hr Programme Partija Hrvatske Croatia Mrsić Amsterdam Coalition Member Affiliation
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to EU Commissioner on Health and Food Safety on Maternal Healthcare During the COVID19 Pandemic
    Mrs. Stella Kyriakides Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Dear Mrs. Kyriakides, EU Member States are dealing with unprecedented challenges arising from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and health systems are now focused on social distancing and avoidance of non-urgent, non-COVID-19 related medical care. Unfortunately, the strains on our health systems and the difficulties are not being borne equally by the population - pregnant women in particular - still require competent and compassionate labor, birth and postpartum care. We have been approached by the international NGO “Human Rights in Childbirth” regarding concerns about the negative consequences to labor and birth care as health systems focus on tackling COVID-19. In this time of a health crisis, changes are being made to the provision of pregnancy and birth care which are not based on scientific evidence, WHO guidelines or guidelines of relevant European professional organisations. Those changes are arguably unnecessary and, in many cases, not proportional to the response required to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, we are informed that: • Maternity services are being de-prioritised with regards to adequate staffing, personal protective equipment for staff and access to needed resources • Community and out of hospital maternity services (including midwifery units and home birth) are being closed down without warning • Women are being forced to submit to unwanted inductions and scheduled caesarean sections with no obstetric indication • Women are being separated from their newborn infants • Women are being denied the right to a companion in labour and birth, as well as visitors All citizens are entitled to the protection of their right to the highest attainable level of health during this crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Meps Join a New Interest Group to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
    MEPs join a new Interest Group to tackle Antimicrobial Resistance Brussels, 21 November 2019 – Today sees the launch of a new MEP Interest Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) to help address this global health threat under a multi-sectoral 'One Health' approach integrating its human, animal, and environmental components. The World Health Organization has identified AMR as one of the top ten global health threats. If no effective action is taken, AMR could push 24 million people into extreme poverty globally by 2030 and cause the death of 10 million people every year by 2050. The European Parliament can play a key role in boosting actions on AMR at EU level to ensure that the Commission and Member States deliver on their commitments and implement effective policy responses to the AMR threat. The European Court of Auditors’ Special Report on EU Action on AMR released last week concluded that to date, the European Commission's support to strengthen national policies resulted in little progress in reducing AMR. This demonstrates the need for a dedicated parliamentary group to help ensure that more concerted action is taken at EU and national level to tackle AMR within a 'One Health' perspective. "The setting up of a new MEP Interest Group on AMR during the World Antibiotic Awareness Week 2019 is a real milestone - ensuring that AMR remains high on the EU policy and political agenda. It is a strong signal towards finding real solutions to tackle one of the most serious health threats of our time, impacting the lives of many Europeans" said Ann Marie Borg, Coordinator of the AMR Stakeholder Network.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read and Download the List of IMCO Member Meps
    Sheet1 Austria Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs Austria Österreichische Volkspartei Austria Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs Belgium Christlich Soziale Partei Belgium Parti Socialiste Belgium Bulgaria Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria Bulgaria Movement for Rights and Freedoms Croatia Socijaldemokratska partija Hrvatske Czech Republic ANO 2011 Czech Republic Česká strana sociálně demokratická Czech Republic Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy Czech Republic TOP 09 a Starostové Denmark Socialdemokratiet Denmark Estonia Eesti Reformierakond Finland Perussuomalaiset Finland Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue/Finlands Socialdemokratiska Parti France Europe Écologie France Front national France Front national France Front national France Les Républicains France Mouvement Démocrate France Parti radical de gauche Germany Allianz für Fortschritt und Aufbruch Germany Alternative für Deutschland Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Germany DIE LINKE. Germany Piratenpartei Deutschland Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Germany Germany Greece Nea Demokratia Hungary Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt Italy - Italy Forza Italia Italy Forza Italia Italy Movimento 5 Stelle Italy Movimento 5 Stelle Italy Movimento 5 Stelle Italy Movimento 5 Stelle Italy Partito Democratico Italy Partito
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT From: a Roundtable Event Hosted by Dr. Biljana Borzan MEP
    REPORT from: A Roundtable Event hosted by Dr. Biljana Borzan MEP at the European Parliament, Brussels Tuesday, 15 October 2013 ‘The Role of Radiology/Imaging in Personalised Medicine: How to provide the right prevention and treatment to the right patient at the right time?’ Page 2 of 20 Table of contents 1. The importance of imaging for the development of personalised medicine................................................................. 3 2. Collaboration with industry .................................................... 6 3. Patient involvement and empowerment................................. 8 4. Regulatory and legislative challenges .................................... 9 4.1 Market access for imaging biomarkers.........................................9 4.2 Clinical trials .............................................................................9 4.3 Data management, standardisation, access and protection .........10 5. Funding for imaging research ............................................... 11 6. Conclusions ........................................................................... 13 7. Annex .................................................................................... 15 7.1 About ESR ..............................................................................15 7.2 About EAPM............................................................................15 7.3 Speakers Biographies...............................................................16 Page 3 of 20 1. The importance of imaging for the development of personalised
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 17 July 2020 Honourable President, by This Letter, We Wish To
    Brussels, 17 July 2020 Honourable President, By this letter, we wish to bring to your attention certain issues concerning the sponsored groups of visitors to the European Parliament, arising from the coronavirus pandemic. We all agree that visitors groups are of great importance. They lead to more transparency and are instrument to communicate the European project into member states. They make the EU institutions tangible and link the European project with personal stories. Almost 80,000 people are visiting the Parliament in Brussels or Strasbourg each year through the MEPs' contingents. In total, around 450,000 people visit the institution each year. Since the Corona shutdown in March, visitors were no longer allowed. Although it has not yet been communicated, it can be assumed that visitor groups will still not be admitted after the parliamentary summer recess. That is why we, the undersigned MEPs, believe that the right signal would be to carry over the quotas from 2020 to 2021 and make next year a year of extraordinary transparency. Yours sincerely, The undersigned Members of the European Parliament CC: The Quaestors of the European Parliament Erik Marquardt, Greens/EFA Victor Negrescu, S&D Moritz Körner, Renew Grace O’Sullivan, Greens/EFA Alex Agius Saliba, S&D Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, Greens/EFA Eva Maydell, EPP Giorgos Georgiou, GUE/NGL Frédérique Ries, Renew Charles Goerens, Renew Martin Häusling, Greens/EFA Milan Brglez, S&D Terry Reintke, Greens/EFA Niels Fuglsang, S&D Sven Giegold, Greens/EFA Saskia Bricmont, Greens/EFA
    [Show full text]