DOCSLIB.ORG

(ESG) Factors Into the EU Banking Prudential Framework and Into Banks' Business Strategies and Investment Policies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(ESG) Factors Into the EU Banking Prudential Framework and Into Banks' Business Strategies and Investment Policies Development of tools and mechanisms for the integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the EU banking prudential framework and into banks' business strategies and investment policies INTERIM STUDY December 2020 Prepared by: BlackRock Financial Markets Advisory The information and views set out in this Interim Study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this Interim Study Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on the European Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union No FISMA/2019/024/D RESOURCES (Finance – IT) This document has been prepared by the Financial Markets Advisory Group within BlackRock for the sole use of the European Commission (“Commission”). The information and views contained herein are provided for Commission informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any other reason. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The views expressed are subject to change and do not necessarily reflect the views of BlackRock. Any reliance upon information in this material is at the sole risk of the recipient. Where the information contained in these materials is from third party sources, the information is from sources believed to be reliable, but BlackRock has not independently verified any of the information contained herein and does not assume any liability for it. Additionally, BlackRock is not required to provide the Commission with updates, modifications, or amendments to the information, opinions, estimates, or forecasts described herein should BlackRock determine that such currently set forth communication becomes inaccurate. BLACKROCK, BLACKROCK SOLUTIONS, and ALADDIN are registered and unregistered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners. INTERIM STUDY Table of Contents 1. Purpose and structure of the Interim Study ........................................................ 4 1.1. Background of this Interim Study ................................................................ 4 1.2. Structure of the Interim Study .................................................................... 5 2. Context and objectives of the Study .................................................................. 7 2.1. Context of the Study ................................................................................. 7 2.2. Purpose and objectives of the Study ............................................................ 8 3. Overview of Study methodology and approach .................................................. 10 3.1. Data collection tools and techniques .......................................................... 10 3.2. Definition of stakeholder perimeter groups ................................................. 10 3.3. Total coverage of the Interim Study .......................................................... 11 4. Modalities of integrating ESG risks into EU banks’ risk management processes ..... 13 4.1 Overview of focus areas for research ......................................................... 13 4.2 Stocktake of current ESG practices ............................................................ 15 4.2.1 First key takeaways .......................................................................... 15 4.2.2 ESG risk definition & identification ....................................................... 18 4.2.3 ESG risk governance & strategy .......................................................... 35 4.2.4 ESG risk management processes & tools .............................................. 41 4.2.5 ESG risk reporting & disclosure ........................................................... 71 4.3 First overview of the possible arrangements, processes, mechanisms and strategies to map, assess and manage ESG risks ................................................. 81 5 Modalities of integrating ESG risks into EU prudential supervision........................ 87 5.1 Overview of focus areas for research ......................................................... 87 5.2 Stocktake of current ESG practices ............................................................ 89 5.2.1 First key takeaways .......................................................................... 89 5.2.2 ESG risk definition & identification ....................................................... 92 5.2.3 ESG governance & strategy .............................................................. 103 5.2.4 Supervisors’ assessment of ESG risk ................................................. 106 5.2.5 ESG requirements, guidelines & engagement initiatives ....................... 120 5.3 First overview of the tools and mechanisms for the integration of ESG risks into the EU prudential supervision ........................................................................... 130 6. Modalities of integrating ESG objectives into EU banks' business strategies and investment policies ............................................................................................. 135 6.1 Overview of focus areas for research ........................................................ 135 6.2 Stocktake of current ESG practices ........................................................... 137 6.2.1 First key takeaways ........................................................................ 137 6.2.2 ESG financial products, services and markets ..................................... 140 6.2.3 ESG strategy & governance .............................................................. 153 INTERIM STUDY 6.2.4 ESG measurement, monitoring & disclosure ....................................... 159 6.2.5 ESG portfolio steering & business as usual processes .......................... 169 6.3 A first overview of the impediments to the development of a well-functioning EU market for green finance and instruments and strategies to promote the scaling-up of green finance ................................................................................................. 175 6.3.1 A first overview of the impediments to the development of a well- functioning EU market for green finance and for responsible investment ............ 175 6.3.2 A first overview of the appropriate instruments and strategies to promote the scaling-up of green finance and of the market for sustainable financial products and to enhance the ability of banks to understand how ESG objectives can translate into financial opportunities ........................................................................... 180 Annex I. List of abbreviations .............................................................................. 185 Annex II. List of stakeholders .............................................................................. 187 Annex III. Bibliography ....................................................................................... 192 INTERIM STUDY 1. Purpose and structure of the Interim Study 1.1. Background of this Interim Study This document represents the Draft Interim Study prepared by BlackRock Financial Markets Advisory (BlackRock FMA) on the development of tools and mechanisms for the integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the EU banking prudential framework and into banks' business strategies and investment policies, as per Tender Specifications N° FISMA/2019/024/D1 (the Tender Specifications) on behalf of the European Commission (the Commission). In line with the Commission’s Tender Specifications, the Interim Study focuses primarily on the stocktake exercise of current practices by banks and supervisors and is based on a preliminary analysis of the data collected so far as highlighted below. The Interim Study should cover all elements addressed in chapter 2.2.2 of the Tender Specifications, including “the comprehensive results of the stocktake exercise on the way banks currently deal with ESG risks”, “practices for the integration of ESG risks into prudential supervision”, as well as the “comprehensive results of the stocktake exercise on the current banks’ strategies to integrate sustainability factors”.2 Moreover, the Interim Study should provide “a first overview of possible arrangements, processes, mechanisms and strategies to be implemented by EU banks to map, assess and manage ESG risks, mechanisms for the integration of ESG risks (with particular focus on environmental risks) into EU prudential supervision”, as well as “impediments to the development of a well-functioning EU market for green finance and for responsible investment as well as of the appropriate instruments and strategies to promote the scaling-up of green finance”. As such, the Interim Study provides preliminary areas, as highlighted by the Study participants, that could be focus areas for identifying key principles, and that will be further analysed and expanded upon during the remainder of the Study. Considering the timeline set forth in the Tender Specifications, the assignment was structured in four
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Us Policymaker Esg Primer
    2020 U.S. POLICYMAKER ESG PRIMER DECEMBER 2020 About Paul, Weiss’s sustainability and ESG advisory practice Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is a firm of 1,000 lawyers who provide innovative and effective solutions to our clients’ most complex legal and business challenges. Our sustainability and environmental, social and governance (ESG) advisory practice helps boards and executives navigate the legal, business and political ramifications of developing and implementing sustainability and other ESG initiatives. We advise on ESG-focused stakeholder engagement, corporate governance, crisis management, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, diversity and inclusion, ethics and compliance. For more information visit paulweiss.com/practices/sustainability-esg. This Primer is not intended to provide legal advice, and no legal or business decision should be based on its content. About Refinitiv Refinitiv is one of the world’s largest providers of financial markets data and infrastructure, serving over 40,000 institutions in approximately 190 countries. It provides leading data and insights, trading platforms, and open data and technology platforms that connect a thriving global financial markets community – driving performance in trading, investment, wealth management, regulatory compliance, market data management, enterprise risk and fighting financial crime. Report authors Barnabas Acs, Ph.D., Global Business Development Director, Sustainable Finance, Refinitiv Mark S. Bergman, Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
    [Show full text]
  • HSBC Asset Management – UK Stewardship Code Report 2020 1
    HSBC Asset Management UK Stewardship Code Report 2020 Foreword We welcome the UK Stewardship Code 2020, which we have applied during the course of 2020. We were early signatories to the first Stewardship Code and recognised the ISC Statement of Principles which preceded it. Our stewardship is an important expression of our fiduciary responsibility to our clients. We believe that deep consideration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and commitment to active stewardship is integral to sound investment decisions that will deliver sustainable returns to our clients. I hope that this statement will give clients and other stakeholders a good understanding of how we have applied the Code. The COVID-19 pandemic meant that 2020 was an extraordinary year. The impact of the pandemic was the focus for much engagement but did not divert investors and companies from significant progress in addressing other systemic risks such as climate change. As we emerge from the Covid-19 crisis, we support the call to build back a better, more inclusive and sustainable world. There is much to be done to achieve these goals, and we are committed to playing our part. We will continue our active stewardship, incorporating ESG factors in our investment process and creating long term value for our clients, supporting the transition to a more sustainable economy and society. Joanna Munro, Chief Investment Officer HSBC Asset Management – UK Stewardship Code Report 2020 1 |PUBLIC| PURPOSE & GOVERNANCE Principle 1 Signatories’ purpose, investment beliefs, strategy, and culture enable stewardship that creates long-term value for clients and beneficiaries leading to sustainable benefits for the economy, the environment and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprisk the Leading Research Tool to Help You Flag, Assess, and Monitor ESG Risks in Your Business
    An introduction to RepRisk The leading research tool to help you flag, assess, and monitor ESG risks in your business RepRisk AG Zurich, Switzerland February 2018 RepRisk AG, Zurich, Switzerland | www.reprisk.com | RepRisk® is a registered trademark. RepRisk delivers leading research solutions to mitigate ESG and business conduct risks § RepRisk is a pioneer in ESG and business conduct risk research and business intelligence § 1998: Founded as a risk consultancy serving the financial sector § 2006: Launch of the RepRisk Platform as a due diligence solution to help firms identify, assess, and monitor risks and violations of international standards in their business § Today: Runs the world’s most comprehensive database on ESG risks, serving 200+ clients globally – and the only provider to cover private companies and projects in developed, emerging and frontier markets. § Headquarters in Zurich, with offices in Berlin, Manila, and Toronto 2 RepRisk serves clients worldwide – helping them prevent and mitigate ESG risks in their business PRIVILEGED 3 Our framework: ESG risks can materially impact a firm’s social license to operate and its bottom line Business conduct risks Environmental Social Governance Pollution, waste, Human rights abuses, Corruption, bribery, climate change labor, discrimination tax evasion, fraud Compliance risks Reputational risks Financial risks PRIVILEGED 4 Our research approach: It’s not enough to look at policies – you must look at performance There are two sources of information used to assess a company: RepRisk: Outside-in perspective Other providers: Inside-out focus § Focuses on performance § Focuses on intention § Based on media, stakeholders, § Based on a company’s own self- and public sources reporting, such as: external to a company § Sustainability or CSR Reports § Provides a timely and § effective “reality check” Company website about what is happening on-the- § Company Code of Conduct ground, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Environmentally and Socially Controversial Companies of 2010 Zurich, December 15, 2010 / Karen Reiner
    Most Environmentally and Socially Controversial Companies of 2010 Zurich, December 15, 2010 / Karen Reiner According to the reputational risk radar RepRisk, the top ten most environmentally and socially controversial multinational companies in 2010 were: 1. Transocean Ltd 6. Chevron Corp 2. BP PLC 7. BG Group PLC 3. Vedanta Resources PLC 8. Royal Dutch Shell 4. ExxonMobil Corp 9. Sinar Mas Group 5. Foxconn Electronics Inc 10. Magyar Aluminium (MAL) Companies on the list have been severely criticized by the world’s media, governmental organizations and NGOs for issues including human rights abuses, severe environmental violations, impacts on local communities, corruption and bribery, as well as breaches of labor, and health and safety standards. Rankings are based on the Reputational Risk Index (RRI), as measured by RepRisk throughout 2010. The RRI is directly derived from the negative pr ess captured by RepRisk and its calculation is strictly rule-based. RepRisk does not measure a firm's overall reputation. Instead, by capturing criticism, RepRisk computes a firm's exposure to controversy and therefore provides an indicator for reputational risk. RepRisk is used by asset owners and asset managers, commercial and investment bankers, supply chain managers, and corporate responsibility experts. The Reputational Risk Index (RRI) ranges from zero (lowest) to 100 (highest) and its calculation is based on the reach of news sources, the frequency and timing of news, as well as its content, i.e. severity and novelty of the issues addressed. The RRI is an indicator of a company's exposure to controversial issues and allows an initial assessment of risks that are attached to investments and business relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprisk Special Report Deep Sea Extractive Activities: Seabed Mining and Deep Sea Drilling
    ESG Business Intelligence RepRisk Special Report Deep Sea Extractive Activities: Seabed Mining and Deep Sea Drilling June 2015 Foreword from the CEO I am pleased to announce the release of our Deep Sea Extractive Activities Report, which focuses on the challenges facing Seabed Mining and Deep Sea Drilling. The scientific community is slowly recognizing that the deep-sea marine environment harbors complex and diverse ecosystems that can potentially benefit mankind. Pharmaceutical companies also believe that the deep-sea may provide resources for the discovery of new medicines derived from natural products. Exploration of the deep-sea marine environment is in its infancy, and many discoveries undoubtedly remain to be made. Commercial overfishing and pollution have already harmed the world’s oceans, and the interest to exploit mineral and oil deposits in deep-sea locations has raised concerns that these fragile marine ecosystems will be irrevocably damaged before scientists have had time to explore their full potential. Scientists and civil society organizations are urging companies to consider the cumulative impacts of their extraction in their risk management strategies, and are calling for an international consensus on the protection of the marine environment. We hope that this report sheds some light on the scale of the challenges facing companies that want to explore the commercial potential of deep-sea environments and will increase awareness of the ESG risks involved in such activities. Philipp Aeby CEO, RepRisk AG About RepRisk RepRisk is a leading business intelligence provider specializing in dynamic environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk analytics and metrics. On a daily basis, RepRisk systematically screens big data from a broad range of open intelligence sources in 15 languages in order to identify, filter, analyze and quantify ESG risks (such as environmental degradation, human rights abuses and corruption) related to companies, projects, sectors and countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigm Shift in Financial Markets the Economic and Legal Impacts of the EU Action Plan Sustainable Finance on the Swiss Financial Sector
    www.pwc.ch Paradigm shift in financial markets The economic and legal impacts of the EU Action Plan Sustainable Finance on the Swiss financial sector March 2019 Europe’s financial sector must lead the green transition and make our Union the global destination for sustainable investment. There is no greater return on investment than a healthy planet and economy. Jean-Claude Juncker (22.03.2018) at High-Level Conference on sustainable finance Foreword “Finance will be green, or it won’t exist in the future”. The Ultimately, the financial sector must develop practices French Minister of Finance, Bruno Le Maire, made it clear. to incentivise institutions and their employees to account The transition to a more sustainable economy is a done for and integrate sustainability factors by default. deal internationally, and is gaining speed. The Sustainable By putting in place the Action Plan Sustainable Finance, Development Goals (SDGs) are being implemented by the the EU has created the necessary framework conditions signatory countries, and the Paris Agreement on Climate for this to happen. The anticipated impact will be signifi- Change (Paris Agreement) was ratified in record time. cantly stronger than was experienced under MiFID II, Finance needs to adapt, and has an economic self-interest GDPR or AEoI. in doing so. Just as visionary Alfred Escher founded the Schweizerische There are still those who continue to ignore reality and Kreditanstalt to finance the forward-looking Gotthard railway defend the self-interests of the old fossil world. However, project − a cornerstone of Switzerland’s economic success − upon closer inspection even Donald Trump’s rejection of today, too, we need long-term investment in the sustainable the Paris climate agreement had a limited impact in the face transition and the infrastructure required to achieve it.
    [Show full text]
  • CDP Climate Change Report 2015 United Kingdom Edition
    CDP Climate Change Report 2015 United Kingdom Edition Written on behalf of 822 investors with US$95 trillion in assets CDP Report | October 2015 1 Contents Foreword 3 Global overview 4 2015 Leadership criteria 8 The Climate A List 2015 10 2015 FTSE 350 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index (CDLI) 12 Investor engagement in the UK 13 Profile: BT Group 14 United Kingdom snapshot 16 Profile: SSE 18 Natural Capital 20 Appendix I 24 Investor signatories and members Appendix II 25 FTSE 350 scores Appendix III 30 Responding FTSE SmallCap climate change companies Please note: The selection of analyzed companies in this report is based on market capitalization of regional stock indices whose constituents change over time. Therefore the analyzed companies are not the same in 2010 and 2015 and any trends shown are indicative of the progress of the largest companies in that region as defined by market capitalization. Large emitters may be present in one year and not the other if they dropped out of or entered a stock index. ‘Like for like’ analysis on emissions for sub-set of companies that reported in both 2010 and 2015 is included for clarity. Some dual listed companies are present in more than one regional stock index. Companies referring to a parent company response, those responding after the deadline and self-selected voluntary responding companies are not included in the analysis. For more information about the companies requested to respond to CDP’s climate change program in 2015 please visit: https://www.cdp.net/Documents/disclosure/2015/Companies-requested-to-respond-CDP-climate-change.pdf Important Notice The contents of this report may be used by anyone providing acknowledgement is given to CDP Worldwide (CDP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Convergence of Sovereign Environmental, Social and Governance Ratings
    Policy Research Working Paper 9583 Public Disclosure Authorized The Convergence of Sovereign Environmental, Social and Governance Ratings Public Disclosure Authorized Eric Bouyé Diane Menville Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Treasury Asset Management & Advisory Department March 2021 Policy Research Working Paper 9583 Abstract This paper studies sovereign environmental, social, and gov- the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible ernance (ESG) ratings from the qualitative and quantitative Investment (UNPRI). Then, a quantitative analysis of angles. First, it introduces the landscape for sovereign ESG the convergence is performed by regressing the scores on ratings. Second, it provides a comparison with the history variables from the World Bank sovereign ESG database. A of credit ratings, factoring in that ESG ratings are in an noticeable contribution to the literature is a high level of early development stage. Third, the paper reviews different explanatory power of these variables across all rating meth- actors, key issues, including taxonomy, models and data odologies, with a R2 ranging between 0.78 and 0.98. An from different providers. The paper provides a qualitative analysis of the importance of variables using a lasso regres- assessment of the convergence of ratings among providers sion exhibits the preponderance of the governance factor by introducing a factor attribution method, that maps all and the limited role of demographic shifts for all providers.. providers’ ratings into a common taxonomy defined by This paper is a product of the Treasury Asset Management & Advisory Department. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement
    sustainability Article Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement Iqbal Owadally 1,* , Jean-René Mwizere 1, Neema Kalidas 2, Kalyanie Murugesu 3 and Muhammad Kashif 4 1 Business School, City, University of London, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ, UK; [email protected] 2 Accenture (UK) Ltd., 30 Fenchurch Street, Billingsgate, London EC3M 3BD, UK; [email protected] 3 Redington Partners LLP, One Angel Court, London EC2R 7HJ, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Business and Economics, Universidad de las Americas Puebla, Sta. Catarina Mártir, Cholula, Puebla 72810, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-20-7040-8478 Abstract: We consider whether sustainable investment can deliver performance comparable to conventional investment in investors’ long-term retirement plans. On the capital markets, sustainable investment can be achieved through various instruments and strategies, one of them being investment in mutual funds that subscribe to ESG (environmental, social, and governance) principles. First, we compare the investment performance of ESG funds with matched conventional funds over the period 1994–2020, in Europe and the U.S. We find no significant evidence of differing performance (at 5% level) despite using a number of investment performance metrics. Second, we perform a historical backtest to model a UK personal retirement plan from 2000 till 2020, taking full account of investment management fees and transaction costs. We find that investing in an index-tracker fund overlaid with ESG screening delivers a pension which is 10.4% larger than is achieved if the index-tracker fund is used without screening.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CHANGE FINANCE, NOT THE CLIMATE ! MAKING FINANCE SERVE SOCIETY change nance FINANCE WATCH ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS CONTENTS Letter from the Chair and the Secretary General 3 Our mission & who we are 4 Our people 5 Testimonials 6 Our team 7 No Libra! campaign 8 EU Elections campaign 9 Change Finance Lobby campaign 10 Conference 2019 11 Sustainable Finance #1. Finance Watch outputs 12 Sustainable Finance #2. Joint actions 14 Stability #1. Banks 15 Stability #2. Markets 16 Retail & financial inclusion #1. Blueprint on retail financial services 17 Retail & financial inclusion #2. Credit & debt collection 18 Financial Statement 19 © Finance Watch 2020 / Editor: Greg Ford / Graphics and typesetting by Camila Dubois The contents of this report may be freely used or reproduced without permission provided the original meaning and context are not altered in any way. For enquiries relating to this annual report, please email [email protected] Finance Watch has received funding from the European Union to implement its work programme. There is no implied endorse- ment by the EU or the European Commission of Finance Watch’s work, which remains the sole responsibility of Finance Watch. 2 FINANCE WATCH ANNUAL REPORT 2019 LETTER Dear friends and colleagues, LETTER FROM THE Thanks to your help and support, 2019 was a successful year for Finance Watch. CHAIR AND THE As we write this in May 2020, we still have not overcome the corona crisis. We SECRETARY wish you and your families well in this difficult period. As we reflect on these strange times and on our past year’s work, Finance Watch’s mission seems GENERAL more relevant than ever.
    [Show full text]
  • In ESG: Investor Myth Buster Table of Contents
    Amplifying the “S” in ESG: Investor Myth Buster Table of Contents ESG Working Group: who are we? 3 Amplifying the “S” in ESG: Executive Summary 4 Investor myths about “S” indicators 7 Introduction: Investor myths about “S” indicators 8 Myth 1 - Financial materiality: Social performance is less financially material than environmental performance 10 Myth 2 - Starting point: It is too difficult to know how and where to start assessing social performance 14 Myth 3 - Data: The “S” indicators are too hard to measure; there is no reliable and comparable data 17 Myth 4 - Integration process: Qualitative surveys or questionnaires are the best method for tackling social issues and analysing the social aspects of performance 22 Myth 5 - Relevance to investors: Integrating “S” indicators is only relevant for impact investors 26 Conclusion 32 Amplifying the “S” in ESG: Investor Myth Buster 2 REUTERS/Krishnendu Halder ESG Working Group: who are we? We are a new partnership that has been formed The Group hopes that this ongoing work will with the aim of emphasising the importance of help further the momentum for both the ‘social’ criteria within Environmental, Social improving the “S” indicators and expanding and Governance (ESG) investing. their use among the investor community. The Thomson Reuters Foundation, Refinitiv, The partners view this white paper as the start International Sustainable Finance Centre (ISFC), of a broad dialogue to promote a better White & Case, Eco-Age, The Mekong Club, and understanding, and wider adoption, of social the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) criteria in investment strategies. We plan to – an observer participant – have created the carry on with this work by engaging with more ESG Working Group (‘the Group’), as a pro bono stakeholders, as well as organising events and partnership that brings together civil society, training sessions to build greater capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Finance Serve Nature from the Niche of Conservation finance to the Mainstreaming of Natural Capital Approaches in financial Systems
    Making Finance Serve Nature From the niche of Conservation finance to the mainstreaming of Natural Capital approaches in financial systems A Finance Watch report May 2019 “Destroying rainforest for economic gain is like burning a Renaissance painting to cook a meal.” E. O. Wilson Author: Ludovic Suttor-Sorel Editor: Greg Ford Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Dr. Nicolas Solonakis for his invaluable input. Many thanks also to Alexandre Rambaud (AgroParisTech), Mirjam Wolfrum (CDP), Michael Zimonyi (CDSB), Marta Santamaria (NCC), Rens Van Tilburg (Sustainable Finance Lab), Ciprian Ionescu and Hugo Bluet (WWF France) and Théo De Schutter for their feedback and input. Cover photo: Photo by v2osk on Unsplash, typeset by Charlotte Geiger © Finance Watch 2019 The contents of this report may be freely used or reproduced without permission provided the original meaning and context are not altered in any way. Where third party copyright has been acknowledged, permission must be sought from the third party directly. For enquiries relating to this report, please email contact@finance-watch.org Finance Watch has received funding from the European Union to implement its work programme. There is no implied endorsement by the EU or the European Commission of Finance Watch’s work, which remains the sole responsibility of Finance Watch. Making Finance Serve Nature Table of contents A Call to Action 4 Policy ideas 6 Introduction 10 I. Context 11 1. The risk of an environmental collapse 12 2. Nature and the economy 15 2.1 Dependencies on nature and impacts 15 2.2 The environmental negative externalities 16 3. The investment need for ecosystem restoration and conservation 17 II.
    [Show full text]