DOCSLIB.ORG

DWH JB Appendices Volume 2 Pt 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DWH JB Appendices Volume 2 Pt 1 16 April 2013 Land to the South of Mitton Road, Whalley Proof of Evidence for Jonathan Berry BA (Hons), Dip LA, AIEMA, CMLI, M.Arbor.A Landscape and Visual Matters On behalf of David Wilson Homes North West and A C Surveyors & Valuers Volume 2: Appendices, Plans & Photographs Planning Inspectorate ref: APP/T2350/A/12/2188887 Planning Authority ref: 3/2012/0637/P Report Number: 1490/R02b_JB_RW Author: Jonathan Berry CMLI Volume 1: Text Contents Section 1: Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………1 Section 2: Landscape Character and Context of the Appeal Site …………………………….7 Section 3: Visual Context of the Appeal Site ………………………………………………….19 Section 4: Review of Relevant Policy, Consultation Responses and Landscape Response to Reasons for Refusal …………………………………………………………………………33 Section 5: Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………41 Volume 2: Appendices, Plans & Photographs Appendix 1: Extract of the RVPBC Rule 6 Statement of Case Appendix 2: Pre-Application Meeting Minutes dated 28th March 2012. Appendix 3: Pre-Application email Letter from RVBC dated 15th November 2011. Appendix 4: Extract of the Landscape Character Assessment – Guidance for England and Scotland, Scottish Natural Heritage and The Countryside Agency, 2002 (known as SNH guidance). Appendix 5: Extract from the Countryside Agency, Character Area 35 Description. Appendix 6: Extract of the Lancashire County Council - Landscape and Heritage Joint Core Strategy Adopted SPD (July 2006). Appendix 7: Extract of the Lancashire County Council with English Heritage – Lancashire Historic Characterisation Programme (December 2002). Appendix 8: Extract of the Lancashire County Council - Landscape Strategy for Lancashire - Landscape Character Assessment (December 2000). Appendix 9: Extract of the Forest of Bowland AONB - Landscape Character Assessment (September 2009). Appendix 10: Extract of the Lancashire County Council - Lancashire Historic Town Survey – Whalley (2006). Appendix 11: Whalley Conservation Area Townscape Appraisal Map. Appendix 12: LVIA Assessment Criteria Tables (Sensitivity, Magnitude of Change and Significance of Effect). Appendix 13: Photomontage Methodology. Appendix 14: Pre-Application email from RVBC dated 20th April 2012. Appendix 15: Penny Bennett Landscape and Visual Assessment (January 2013). Land to the South of Mitton Road, Whalley Proof of Evidence for Jonathan Berry BA (Hons), Dip LA, AIEMA, CMLI, M.Arbor.A 1490_R02b_16 April 2013_JB_RW Plans Plan 1: Topography & First Sieve GIS Visual Analysis (1490/01 03/12 JB/MP) Plan 2: Photoviewpoint Locations (1490/02b 05/12 JB/JJ) Plan 3: Verified Visual Envelope (1490/03a 05/12 JB/JJ) Plan 4: Landscape Planning Context & Public Rights of Way (1490/04a 05/12 JB/JJ) Plan 5: Landscape Character (1490/05a 05/12 JB/JJ) Plan 6: Landscape Strategy (1490/06a 05/12 JB/JJ) Plan 7: Indicative Planting Strategy (1490/21 06/12 JB/JJ) Photoviewpoints 1 – 24 (1490/07a to 20a 06/12 JB/JJ) Photomontages 1 – 11 (1490/18a 05/12 JB/MP) Land to the South of Mitton Road, Whalley Proof of Evidence for Jonathan Berry BA (Hons), Dip LA, AIEMA, CMLI, M.Arbor.A 1490_R02b_16 April 2013_JB_RW Appendix 1: Extract of the RVPBC Rule 6 Statement of Case Land to the South of Mitton Road, Whalley Proof of Evidence for Jonathan Berry BA (Hons), Dip LA, AIEMA, CMLI, M.Arbor.A 1490_R02b_16 April 2013_JB_RW Landscape/Visual Impact Considerations 4.7 The Council will demonstrate that there will be a loss of visual amenity experienced by residents and visitors to Whalley as a result of the appeal proposals which willbe of an adverse permanent nature, some of which will be considered significant in terms of the EIA regulations. 4.8 By reason of extending development beyond the village boundary and into open countryside, the proposals will result in a permanent adverse change on the character of this high sensitivity settlement edge river corridor landscape, introducing urban elements besides the new homes themselves, which will include lighting and other infrastructure. 4.9 The Council will show that the open river corridor landscape within which the site is located forms the immediate rural setting to the conservation area as well as a number of important heritage features which are an intrinsic part of Whalley’s identity as a village. It is also important as this open landscape is also associated with the former historic gateway to the village, and which is reinforced in the iconic design of the railway viaduct piers at this location. The Council will show that if the proposals were to proceed this important landscape and amenity asset would be permanently lost. This would result in the extension of the village beyond its historic edge in to the open rural landscape and thereby having a detrimental impact on the townscape character and amenity of the conservation area and associated heritage features. 4.10 The Council will conclude that the proposals will harm landscape and townscape character and visual amenity and will be contrary to Policy G1 and ENV3 of the Districtwide Local Plan, Policies DMG1, EN2 and DME2 of the Regulation 22 Submission Draft Core Strategy and the requirements of NPPF. Planning Considerations 4.11 The Council will demonstrate that the appeal proposal is outside the present settlement boundary and is an urban extension to Whalley. As an urban extension the Council will show that there is need to consider as part of the planning balance whether there is a need for additional housing that outweighs the identified harm to the loss of open countryside and related harm to landscape visual impact and amenity, the Conservation Area and identified heritage assets as an unsympathetic Page 5 of 9 Appendix 2: Pre-Application Meeting Minutes dated 28th March 2012. Land to the South of Mitton Road, Whalley Proof of Evidence for Jonathan Berry BA (Hons), Dip LA, AIEMA, CMLI, M.Arbor.A 1490_R02b_16 April 2013_JB_RW MEETING NOTE 1 New York Street Manchester M1 4HD T: 0161 233 7676 F: 0161 233 7677 www.turleyassociates.co.uk Client: David Wilson Homes Project: Land at Broad Lane, Whalley File Ref: BARM2006 Meeting Date: 28/03/2012 Venue: Ribble Valley Borough Council Offices, Clitheroe Present: John Macholc RVBC Head of Planning Dave Hewitt RVBC Countryside Officer Sarah Westwood RVBC Planning Gareth Fort RVBC Planning Adrian Dowd RVBC Conservation & Design Colin Hirst RVBC Regeneration & Housing Andrew Taylor David Wilson Homes Phil Livesley David Wilson Homes Jon Berry Tyler Grange Graham Love Turley Associates Katy Lightbody Turley Associates Laurie Lane Turley Associates Notes Action GL confirmed the last pre-application meeting was in September, with advice issued in December. The objective of this meeting is to address remaining issues of design, heritage & landscape GL said that since the last meeting, the NPPF has been published and various appeal decisions have been made. At the moment, we are not aware of any reason why an application cannot come forward. GL reviewed the previous advice and provided an up-to-date position, prior to discussing the 3 key issues for the meeting. GL confirmed the scheme will accommodate 30% affordable housing. SW said RVBC requires a split of affordable rent and shared ownership. The requirement cab include the 15% elderly provision. BELFAST | BIRMINGHAM | BRISTOL | CARDIFF | EDINBURGH | GLASGOW | LEEDS | LONDON | MANCHESTER | SOUTHAMPTON Srtvr rq v @tyhq U yr 6pvhr Gvvrq !!"$"'& GL confirmed we are reviewing how best to deliver the elderly provision. Potentially this may include standard bungalows or a specialist extra-care facility. CH confirmed that as long as they’re lifetime homes, the type of building does not actually matter. GL referred to the recent application at Accrington Road, Whalley which is a market scheme for the over 55’s. JM said Members always raise the issue there are no bungalows and therefore the application may be pitched to satisfy this view. GL confirmed ecology and tree reports have been prepared and there are no issues for the development. GL confirmed a tree constraints plan will be included in the application. GL said that for Highways, surveys are being progressed and discussions are ongoing. AT asked whether the renewable energy policy was specific in terms of how provision is delivered. SW confirmed normally 10% and RVBC expect it being provided across site with at least some visible measures, such as solar PV. GL said we have consulted LCC as local education authority and spoken with Lynn MacDonald. We have confirmed the approach and that there is no objection, subject to financial contribution. GL said that we are still in discussion with the EA & UU on drainage. AT added that we’re conscious anything approved will come off 222 unit capacity; however, he pointed out there is the potential to provide further measures if required. GL confirmed flood risk is not a problem and a land quality assessment is being prepared. A Phase I geo-technical will be submitted with the application. JM confirmed the site will not comprise high grade agricultural land. CH provided an update on planning policy. The Reg 27 Core Strategy is soon to be submitted. It still requires additional housing in Whalley. Subject to Members’ approval, consultation on this document will be held in April. RVBC is accelerating the timetable to bring the Core Strategy forward as soon as possible, but Members are concerned about development pre-empting the Core Strategy before it is adopted. Members may want to adopt the Core Strategy for DC purposes before full adoption. Page 2 of 6 GL asked how the 3.3 years’ supply was calculated in the Clitheroe appeal? CH said it was based on RSS. Inspector thought RSS was the key consideration and CH said they want to use this until consultation is undertaken on the revised figure. GL asked whether there is still political pressure to resist the figure of 4,000 dwellings over the plan period? CH said they took advice from NLP. The working group went for the middle requirement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Earby Chronicles
    Earby Chronicles Edition 69 SUMMER 2013 SOCIETY AIMS: to raise awareness, EARBY MAY DAYS IN THE 1950s foster an interest Researched from programmes lodged in the EDLHS Archive and facilitate by Stephanie Carter£1.50 research into the heritage of Earby & district including Thornton in Craven, Sough, Kelbrook, Harden, Hague and Salterforth. OFFICIALS Chairman & NRCC Rep. : Bob Abel phone 01282 843850 Vice Chairman & Edi- tor of Chronicles: Stephanie Carter Phone 01756 794099 Secretary : Margaret Brown phone 01282 843932 Throughout the 1950s the Earby & District Social & Festival Com- mittee organised some superb May Day celebrations, when the streets Treasurer & Archi- and Recreation Ground were thronged with people from Earby and vist : Wendy Faulkner neighbouring towns and villages. There were colourful souvenir pro- phone 01282 863160 grammes, the spectacle of the procession through the town, activities on Programme Secretary the field and the annual highlight of crowning the May Queens: Vacant Marjorie Horsfield (1951), Mary Ward (1952), Catherine Lancaster (1953), Judith Dingley (1954), Marlene Nutter (1955), Rita Collins (1956), Merle Archivist: Margaret Greenwood Griffiths (1957), Sylvia Evans (1958) and Gloria Halstead (1959). phone 01282 843394 1951 was Festival of Britain Year. On 26 th May all the “walking Web Site / IT Vacant classes” assembled in Linden Road for judging and there was a competi- tive spirit amongst the participants in the variety of classes, which in- Committee: Trevor Tattersall cluded: Mary Corteen Children
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Your Railway Ideas Fund Registration Registration Form
    Restoring Your Railway Ideas Fund Registration Registration Form – March 2020 Proposed Scheme: Clitheroe to Hellifield Name of main Ribble Valley Borough Council promoter: (this could be a Local Authority, community group or Local Enterprise Partnership) Sponsoring MP (s) Nigel Evans Date Submitted: 26th February 2020 DfT use only: Date Reference Received 1 Please complete the following: Scheme Promoter Contact Information 1.1 Applicant Ribble Valley Borough Council organisation name: 1.2 Applicant contact Nicola Hopkins name: 1.3 E-mail: [email protected] 1.4 Telephone No.: 01200414532 Ribble Valley Borough Council, Council Offices, Church 1.5 Address: Walk, Clitheroe, Lancashire BB7 2RA Brief description of proposed development work Re-introduce passenger services between Clitheroe and Hellifield and explore options for increasing freight along this route Project Overview Clitheroe Station, Railway View Road, Clitheroe, Lancashire (Grid Ref: SD 741420) 2.1 To Location Hellifield Station, Station Road, Hellifield, Skipton. North Yorks BD23 4HN (Grid Ref: SD 851572) PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PLANS 2 This project seeks to make increased use of the line between Clitheroe and Hellifield. Currently the line is only used by franchised passenger services on Sundays throughout the year. The project will evaluate two options for increasing passenger traffic between Clitheroe and Hellifield: a. To extend the Rochdale - Manchester to Blackburn terminating service to Clitheroe and Hellifield; or b. To introduce a new service between Preston – Blackburn – Clitheroe and Hellifield. The line between Clitheroe and Hellifield is mainly used by freight with the exception of franchised passenger services on Sunday and the occasional charter service. The existing franchised passenger service comprise DalesRail which operates during the summer timetable between Blackpool North and Carlisle via Clitheroe and during the winter timetable a service of 2 trains a day operates between Blackpool North/Preston and Hellifield via Clitheroe.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Textile Mills Rapid Assessment Survey 2010
    Lancashire Textile Mills Lancashire Rapid Assessment Survey Oxford Archaeology North March 2010 Lancashire County Council and English Heritage Issue No: 2009-10/1038 OA North Job No: L10020 Lancashire Textile Mills: Rapid Assessment Survey Final Report 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Project Background ..................................................................................... 6 1.2 Variation for Blackburn with Darwen........................................................... 8 1.3 Historical Background.................................................................................. 8 2. ORIGINAL RESEARCH AIMS AND OBJECTIVES...................................................10 2.1 Research Aims ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives .................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Blackburn with Darwen Buildings’ Digitisation .......................................... 11 3. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................12 3.1 Project Scope............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Prospectus Document September 2018 Index
    Reopening the Skipton-Colne rail line: The ‘Northern Link’ project Prospectus document September 2018 Index Page 1. Introducing the “Northern Link” Project 4 2. The Project’s Supporters 5 3. The Existing Rail Services: A Tale of Two Halves 6 4. The Existing Economy: A Tale of Two Halves 7 5. The “Northern Link” Project: Connecting Communities 8-13 6. Recent Economic Studies 14 7. The Opportunities for Lancashire and Yorkshire 15-19 8. Benefits for the Rail Network of Northern England 20-22 9. Complementary to other Proposed TfN Projects 23-24 10. Project Scope 25-28 2 3 1.0 2.0 Introducing the “Northern Link” Project The Project’s Supporters The project is to extend the successful Airedale line from Leeds into Pendle/Burnley, by SELRAP is the Skipton and East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership: a community group which reopening a short 12 mile length of “missing link” railway line between Skipton and Colne. has been campaigning to re-open the Colne to Skipton railway for many years. SELRAP is a non-political organisation; however, it enjoys cross-party political support. Approximately The 12 mile line from Skipton to Colne is to be Finally, this “all-new” trans-Pennine rail route 500 individuals and 50 businesses are members of SELRAP, all of these paying an annual subscription. built on the formation of the currently-disused would: SELRAP also enjoys very widespread community recognition and support, especially in the districts of original route of 1848, which crosses the county • Interconnect with many other “Northern Craven, Burnley and Pendle.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandygate Square, Burnley Framework Travel Plan
    Barnfield Construction Ltd Sandygate Square, Burnley Framework Travel Plan February 2019 Barnfield Construction Ltd Sandygate Square, Burnley Framework Travel Plan OFFICE ADDRESS: PROJECT NO: DATE: J324155 February 2019 Jactin House 24 Hood Street Manchester M4 6WX REPORT NO. PREPARED: DATE ISSUE: STATUS: CHECKED: AUTHORISED: 2 MA 06/02/2019 Final LW ME CHANGE LOG. VERSION NO. DATE: CHECKED BY: REASON FOR CHANGE: Version 1 04/02/2019 ME Draft for Client team review Version 2 06/02/2019 ME Final version for submission Barnfield Construction Ltd Sandygate Square, Burnley Framework Travel Plan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Preamble 1 1.2 Overview of the Travel Planning Process 1 1.3 Report Structure 2 POLICY CONTEXT 3 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework 3 2.2 Delivering Travel Plans Through the Planning Process 3 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 4 3.1 Site Location and Existing Use 4 3.2 Local Highway Network 4 3.3 Public Rights of Way 8 3.4 Air Quality 9 DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 10 4.1 Proposed Use 10 4.2 Parking Provision 10 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY 12 5.1 Introduction 12 5.2 Pedestrian Accessibility 12 5.3 Cycle Accessibility 14 5.4 Public Transport 15 5.5 Summary 17 TRAVEL PLAN MEASURES 18 6.1 Overview 18 6.2 Travel Plan Coordinator (TPC) 18 6.3 Travel Survey 18 6.4 Encouraging Walking 19 6.5 Encouraging Cycling 19 6.6 Promoting Public Transport 19 6.7 Resident’s Welcome Travel Pack 19 TARGETS, MONITORING AND REVIEW 21 7.1 Introduction 21 7.2 Travel Plan Targets 21 © Copyright mode transport planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire: a Chronology of Flash Flooding
    LANCASHIRE: A CHRONOLOGY OF FLASH FLOODING Introduction The past focus on the history of flooding has been mainly with respect to flooding from the overflow of rivers and with respect to the peak level that these floods have achieved. The Chronology of British Hydrological Events provides a reasonably comprehensive record of such events throughout Great Britain. Over the last 60 years the river gauging network provides a detailed record of the occurrence of river flows and peak levels and flows are summaried in HiflowsUK. However there has been recent recognition that much flooding of property occurs from surface water flooding, often far from rivers. Locally intense rainfall causes severe flooding of property and land as water concentrates and finds pathways along roads and depressions in the landscape. In addition, intense rainfall can also cause rapid rise in level and discharge in rivers causing a danger to the public even though the associated peak level is not critical. In extreme cases rapid rise in river level may be manifested as a ‘wall of water’ with near instantaneous rise in level of a metre or more. Such events are usually convective and may be accompanied by destructive hail or cause severe erosion of hillsides and agricultural land. There have been no previous compilations of historical records of such ‘flash floods’or even of more recent occurrences. It is therefore difficult to judge whether a recent event is unusual or even unique in terms of the level reached at a particular location or more broadly of regional severity. This chronology of flash floods is provided in order to enable comparisons to be made between recent and historical floods, to judge rarity and from a practical point of view to assess the adequacy of urban drainage networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlisle Railway Directory of Resources
    SETTLE – CARLISLE RAILWAY DIRECTORY OF RESOURCES A listing of printed, audio-visual and other resources including museums, public exhibitions and heritage sites * * * Compiled by Nigel Mussett 2020 Petteril Bridge Junction CARLISLE SCOTBY 1942 River Eden CUMWHINTON 1956 Cotehill Viaduct COTEHILL 1952 Dry Beck Viaduct ARMATHWAITE Armathwaite Tunnel Armathwaite Viaduct Baron Wood Tunnels 1 (south) & 2 (north) LAZONBY & KIRKOSWALD Lazonby Tunnel Eden Lacy Viaduct LITTLE SALKELD 1970 Little Salkeld Viaduct Cross Fell 2930ft LANGWATHBY Waste Bank Tunnel Culgaith Tunnel CULGAITH 1970 Crowdundle Viaduct NEWBIGGIN 1970 LONG MARTON 1970 Long Marton Viaduct APPLEBY Ormside Viaduct ORMSIDE 1952 Griseburn Viaduct Helm Tunnel Crosby Garrett Viaduct Crosby Garrett Tunnel CROSBY GARRETT 1952 Smardale Viaduct KIRKBY STEPHEN Birkett Tunnel Wild Boar Fell 2323ft Shotlock Tunnel Ais Gill Viaduct Moorcock Tunnel Lunds Viaduct Mossdale Viaduct Dandry Mire Viaduct Appersett Viaduct GARSDALE Mossdale Rise Hill Tunnel HAWES 1959 Head Tunnel DENT Arten Gill Viaduct Blea Moor Tunnel Dent Head Viaduct Whernside 2415ft Ribblehead Viaduct RIBBLEHEAD Penyghent 2277ft Ingleborough 2372ft Ribble Viaduct HORTON-IN-RIBBLESDALE Little Viaduct Sheriff Brow Viaduct Taitlands Tunnel Whitefriars Viaduct SETTLE Stations - open Marshfield Viaduct Settle Junction Stations - closed, with dates of closure to passengers. River Ribble Crosby Garrett and Cotehill since demolished © Nigel Mussett 2019 © NJM 2018 Route map of the Settle—Carlisle Railway and Hawes Branch GRADIENT PROFILE Gargrave to Carlisle After The Cumbrian Railways Association ’The Midland’s Settle & Carlisle Distance Diagrams’ 1992. CONTENTS Route map of the Settle-Carlisle Railway Gradient profile Introduction A. Primary Sources B. Books, pamphlets and leaflets C. Periodicals and articles D. Research Studies E. Maps F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Textile Mills of Lancashire the Legacy
    ISBN 978-1 -907686-24-5 Edi ted By: Rachel Newman Design, Layout, and Formatting: Frtml Cover: Adam Parsons (Top) Tile wcnving shed of Queen Street Mill 0 11 tile day of Published by: its clo~urc, 22 September 2016 Oxford Ar.:haeology North, (© Anthony Pilli11g) Mill 3, Moor Lane Mills, MoorLnJ1e, (Bottom) Tile iconic, Grade Lancaster, /-listed, Queen Street Mill, LAllQD Jlnrlc S.lfke, lire last sun,ini11g example ~fan in fad steam­ Printed by: powered weaving mill with its Bell & Bain Ltd original loom s in the world 303, Burn field Road, (© Historic England) Thornlieba n k, Glasgow Back Cover: G46 7UQ Tlrt' Beer 1-ln/1 at Hoi till'S Mill, Cfitlwroe ~ Oxford Archaeolog)' Ltd The Textile Mills of Lancashire The Legacy Andy Phelps Richard Gregory Ian Miller Chris Wild Acknowledgements This booklet arises from the historical research and detailed surveys of individual mill complexes carried out by OA North during the Lancashire Textile Mills Survey in 2008-15, a strategic project commissioned and funded by English Heritage (now Historic England). The survey elicited the support of many people, especial thanks being expressed to members of the Project Steering Group, particularly Ian Heywood, for representing the Lancashire Conservation Officers, Ian Gibson (textile engineering historian), Anthony Pilling (textile engineering and architectural historian), Roger Holden (textile mill historian), and Ken Robinson (Historic England). Alison Plummer and Ken Moth are also acknowledged for invaluable contributions to Steering Group discussions. Particular thanks are offered to Darren Ratcliffe (Historic England), who fulfilled the role of Project Assurance Officer and provided considerable advice and guidance throughout the course of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Pendle Infrastructure Strategy
    Preparing a Local Plan for Pendle Evidence Base Infrastructure Strategy September 2014 For an alternative format of this document phone 01282 661330 Pendle Infrastructure Strategy September 2014 Pendle Infrastructure Strategy September 2014 Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Policy context ............................................................................................................................ 6 National Planning Policy Framework ........................................................................................ 6 National Infrastructure Plan, 2010 ............................................................................................ 7 National Policy Statements ....................................................................................................... 8 3. Regional and sub-regional infrastructure studies ................................................................... 10 4. Local studies relevant to infrastructure provision .................................................................. 13 5. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 17 6. Stakeholder engagement and the Duty to Cooperate ............................................................ 20 7. Infrastructure templates ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
    Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Denis Lambert Spout Farm Preston Road Longridge Lancashire Contents 1. Introduction ______________________________________________________________ 4 1.1. Background ______________________________________________________________________ 4 1.2. The Site and Proposals ____________________________________________________________ 4 1.3. The Study Area ___________________________________________________________________ 5 2. Planning policy ___________________________________________________________ 6 2.1. National Planning Policy ___________________________________________________________ 6 2.2. Local Planning Policy _____________________________________________________________ 6 2.3. Saved policies from the Districtwide Local Plan _______________________________________ 7 3. Report Structure _________________________________________________________ 11 4. Methodology ____________________________________________________________ 12 4.1. Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 12 4.2. Best Practice Guidance ___________________________________________________________ 12 4.3. Landscape and Visual Effects _____________________________________________________ 12 4.4. Assessment of Significance _______________________________________________________ 13 4.5. Steps in the Assessment Process __________________________________________________ 14 5. Baseline Conditions _____________________________________________________ 15 5.1. Introduction _____________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C A56 Consultation Report Final
    East Lancashire Transport and Highways Masterplan Consultation Report - A56 Colne to Foulridge Bypass Proposals December 2013 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Main Points Arising from the Consultation ....................................................................... 1 3. Consultation and Engagement ........................................................................................... 1 4. Consultation Event ..................................................................................................................... 2 5. Masterplan Questionnaire Responses .............................................................................. 2 6. Event Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 3 7 Email Representation .................................................................................................................. 4 9 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 5 Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 1: Questionnaire distributed at Colne Library event .................................................. 7 Appendix 2: A56 Route Options Questionnaire..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Station Or Halt Name Line Date Closed Station
    Our Station Station or Halt Name Line Date Closed Station remains Date Visited number (Aberdeen) Holburn Street Deeside Railway (GNoSR) 1937 (Aberdeen) Hutcheon Street Denburn Valley Line (GNoSR) 1937 Abbey and West Dereham GER 1930 Abbey Foregate (Shrewsbury) S&WTN 1912 Abbey Junction NBR, CAL 1921 Abbey of Deer Platform London and North Eastern Railway 1970 Abbey Town NBR 1964 Abbeydore GWR 1941 Abbeyhill (Edinburgh) NBR 1964 Abbots Ripton GNR 1958 Abbots Wood Junction MR 1855 Abbotsbury GWR 1952 Abbotsford Ferry NBR 1931 Abbotsham Road BWH!&AR 1917 Aber (LNWR) Chester and Holyhead Railway 1960 Aberaman TVR 1964 Aberangell Mawddwy Railway/Cambrian Railways 1931 Aberavon (Seaside) Rhondda and Swansea Bay Railway 1962 Aberavon Town Rhondda and Swansea Bay Railway 1962 Aberayron GWR 1951 Aberbargoed B&MJR 1962 Aberbeeg GWR 1962 Aberbran N&B 1962 Abercairny Caledonian 1951 Abercamlais Neath and Brecon Railway 1962 Abercanaid GWR/Rhymney Jt 1951 Abercarn GWR 1962 Aberchalder HR/NBR 1933 Abercrave N&B 1932 Abercwmboi Halt TVR 1956 Abercynon North British Rail 2008 Aberdare Low Level TVR 1964 Aberdeen Ferryhill Aberdeen Railway 1864 Aberdeen Guild Street Aberdeen Railway 1867 Aberdeen Kittybrewster (3 stations of this name, on GNoSR2 lines; all closed) 1968 Aberdeen Waterloo GNoSR 1867 Aberderfyn Halt GWR 1915 Aberdylais Halt GWR 1964 Aberedw Cambrian Railways 1962 Aberfan Cambrian Railways/Rhymney Railway Jt 1951 Aberfeldy Highland Railway 1965 Aberford Aberford Railway 1924 Aberfoyle NBR 1951 Abergavenny Brecon Road Merthyr, Tredegar and
    [Show full text]