DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization and Significance of Shocked Quartz from the Woodleigh Impact Structure, Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization and Significance of Shocked Quartz from the Woodleigh Impact Structure, Western Australia Characterization and significance of shocked quartz from the Woodleigh impact structure, Western Australia Item Type Article; text Authors Hough, R. M.; Lee, M. R.; Bevan, A. W. R. Citation Hough, R. M., Lee, M. R., & Bevan, A. W. R. (2003). Characterization and significance of shocked quartz from the Woodleigh mpact structure, Western Australia. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 38(9), 1341-1350. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00318.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 25/09/2021 10:50:40 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655744 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 38, Nr 9, 1341–1350 (2003) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Characterization and significance of shocked quartz from the Woodleigh impact structure, Western Australia R. M. HOUGH, 1* M. R. LEE, 2 and A. W. R. BEVAN 1 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Australia 2Division of Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 16 January 2003; revision accepted 11 September 2003) Abstract–We re-examined the buried Woodleigh structure in Western Australia, which has been inferred to be a multi-ringed, 120 km diameter impact crater, because the proposed size and possible synchronicity with one of the pre-Mesozoic mass extinction events has attracted controversy. We undertook a detailed study of the petrology and mineralogy of a number of samples of core from the Woodleigh-1 borehole that was drilled into the central uplift of the structure. Crystalline Proterozoic basement rocks comprising granites and gneisses in the Woodleigh-1 core contain minor brecciation in discrete veins and reveal clear evidence of shock metamorphism over the full extent of the core. Imaging of laboratory-etched quartz showed that a large number of grains contain shock deformation lamellae. Microstructural and crystallographic analysis of these lamellae by TEM showed that they are planar deformation features (PDFs) that have subsequently undergone annealing and water assisted recrystallization. The available geological, petrographic, and mineralogical evidence suggest that Woodleigh is an eroded impact crater that is nearer to 60 km than 120 km in diameter. Future drilling projects should better constrain the level of erosion, and may reveal any preserved impact lithologies. INTRODUCTION called Woodleigh-1, that was drilled directly through the center of the structure (Mory et al. 2000a). Using light The Woodleigh structure (26°03 ¢19.3¢¢ S and microscopy (no U-stage), Mory et al. (2000a) reported planar 114°39¢56.3¢¢ E), located on Woodleigh Station near Shark deformation features (PDFs) in quartz and feldspars, and Bay in Western Australia (Fig. 1), has been proposed by Mory subsequently in zircons (Mory et al. 2000b; 2001). The et al. (2000a) and Uysal et al. (2001) to be a buried, 120 km in Proterozoic basement rocks encountered throughout the core diameter, multi-ring impact structure. However, this were also reported to contain extensive glass-bearing interpretation and the suggestion that the impact event may pseudotachylite veining of the S-type (Mory et al. 2000a), have been associated with an extinction event has been although these features have not been characterized in detail seriously questioned (Reimold and Koeberl 2000; Renne et al. (e.g., see Reimold and Koeberl 2000). Mafic enclaves were 2002). The buried circular feature is characterized by a also reported (Mory et al. 2001) and interpreted to have been Bouguer gravity anomaly ~60 km in diameter, and the mixed with granitoids by the impact. structure is comparable to other buried complex impact The age was originally reported to be the earliest Jurassic structures exhibiting a central feature surrounded by 2 annular and, therefore, coincides with the Jurassic-Triassic boundary positive gravity anomalies. An overall diameter of 120 km (Iasky and Mory 1999). Subsequently, workers reported that has been inferred from a subtle arcuate feature east of the apatite fission track dating pointed toward a possible obvious gravity anomaly, as an apparent incursion into the Permian-Triassic boundary age but that a lack of Triassic regional N-S trending Wandagee-Ajana ridge, and by subtle fossils in the crater fill suggested a late Triassic age (Mory et drainage patterns in the region (Mory et al. 2000a; Iasky et al. al. 2000a). Uysal et al. (2001, 2002) report a late Devonian 2001; Uysal et al. 2001). The Geological Survey of Western age (359 ± 4 Ma) from dating of authigenic, coarse fraction Australia record 2001/6 compiled by Mory et al. (2001) is pure illite clay minerals, interpreted by them to be a more circumspect, suggesting 120 km only as a possible hydrothermal product. This method and the corresponding diameter for Woodleigh. age for the impact has been questioned (Renne et al. 2002) but An impact origin for the Woodleigh structure was reiterated by Uysal et al. (2002, 2003). originally proposed following work on a cored borehole, Although the impact age is poorly constrained and many 1341 © Meteoritical Society, 2003. Printed in USA. 1342 R. M. Hough et al. microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to confirm the presence and nature of shock deformation features (Gratz et al. 1996; Montanari and Koeberl 2000). These are complimentary to the U-stage studies of Koeberl et al. (2001) and Reimold et al. (2003). SAMPLING AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES W-1 had been drilled by Layton and Associates in 1981 (see Iasky et al. 2001), but no samples were preserved. The hole was subsequently re-entered and cored from a depth of 190.5 m to 333.1 m into the center of the central uplift (Mory et al. 2001). A second core, W-2A, was drilled into the first annular gravity trough. Both W-1 and W-2A drill cores are housed in the Geological Survey of Western Australia core repository in Perth. The W-1 core was laid out to enable observations of its full length and for thorough sample selection. This core solely comprises mixed crystalline basement lithologies (Fig. 2; Reimold et al. 2003 [Fig. 2]) including gneiss, micro-granite, granite and amphibolite. The complex is strongly deformed and shows evidence of granulite facies metamorphism including porphyroblasts of garnet. We sampled various intervals (Table 1) throughout the length of the core with an emphasis on identifying features that were potentially impact-related or provided potential macro-indicators of shock metamorphism. A striking feature of the core in general is that brecciation has not been so severe as to leave the core friable; it is a competent, uninterrupted Fig. 1. Location map of the Woodleigh structure in Western Australia section of core (Fig. 2), with only weathered/altered mica-rich and the main tectonic features of the region. The locations of the W- 1 and W-2A drill-holes are marked (adapted from Mory et al. [2000] zones being fragile. Samples were removed using a band saw and Iasky et al. [2001]). and further split into specimens for study while leaving the facing section back in the core. In our sample selection, we features of the Woodleigh structure remain unresolved, the noted the sampling of previous workers and attempted to discovery of even a 60 km-sized impact structure is globally collect from different horizons to ensure a greater important. The critical comments of Reimold and Koeberl understanding of Woodleigh geology (Table 1). In hand (2000) and reply by Mory et al. (2000b) highlight the fact that specimen, all lithologies show alignment of minerals, often insufficient studies have been performed to allow the use of illustrated by the biotite mica that also occurs as whisps, thus the terminology and interpretations reported in Mory et al. indicating that they have all been deformed to some degree. (2000a). The size of the structure (Mory et al. 2000a) and its The basement lithologies are typical of strongly deformed classification as multi-ringed (Mory et al. 2000a; Iasky et al. Precambrian metamorphic/igneous complexes, and the 2001; Uysal et al. 2001), combined with its age being foliation, which is present throughout the core, is inferred to postulated as synchronous with an extinction event (Mory et be the product of such regional metamorphism (e.g., Myers al. 2000a; Uysal et al. 2001, 2002, 2003), have led us to 1993). The W-2A core was also examined, and as described in follow the defined convention, as applied to K/T boundary Iasky et al. (2001), the main horizon of interest is a red- shock mineralogies, to differentiate between shock and colored conglomerate (66 m thick) containing sparse, tectonic features in the assumed target rocks. We have also rounded basement clasts (2–3 cm in size). The base of the attempted to constrain the shock facies presented by the target core is marked by a dolomitic breccia that is possibly Silurian rocks in the Woodleigh-1 (W-1) core. in age (Mory et al. 2001) and mudstone with sub-horizontal Here, we report results of a detailed study of the laminations. mineralogy and some of the structural features described from Samples (Table 1) were examined in hand specimen and the W-1 drill core samples (Mory et al. 2000a, 2000b, 2001) prepared as polished thin sections for petrographic and results from a preliminary study of the Woodleigh 2A (W- observations using conventional optical microscopy. A 2A) core (from <15 km west of W-1). Microstructures Philips XL-40 SEM operating at 30 kV, was used to observe preserved within quartz grains in W-1 were examined using some textures in the thin sections, and EDS analyses were optical microscopy, acid etching, scanning electron used for mineral identification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock Metamorphism, Brecciation, and Impact Melting in Meteorites
    72nd Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2009) 5416.pdf SHOCK METAMORPHISM, BRECCIATION, AND IMPACT MELTING IN METEORITES. Edward R. D. Scott. Hawai`i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology. University of Hawai`i. Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. Email: [email protected]. Introduction: The shock metamorphic scheme for ordinary chondrites and an extension of the classification of lunar breccias provides a firm foundation for evaluating the shock and impact histories of many kinds of meteorites [1]. Shock pressure esti- mates are very dependent on the initial state of the target and may be upper limits, e.g., if targets were initially hot or porous [2-3]. Thus, mild shock at elevated temperatures may generate shock stage S1-2 rocks with certain features like those in more heavily shocked rocks [4]. The interpretation of shock and brec- ciation in meteorites is also more complex than for planetary rocks as asteroids may have experienced impacts that were much more diverse than the cratering events that affected planetary rocks. Early disruption of differentiated asteroids: Stony-iron meteorites like pallasites and mesosiderites that form from mol- ten metal and unshocked broken rock may have formed in low- velocity hit-and-run impacts possibly between protoplanets [5] rather than in hypervelocity asteroidal collisions. Destruction at 1-2 AU prior to capture of debris in the asteroid belt by proto- planets may also help to explain how Vesta’s crust survived. Howardites, eucrites and diogenites: Most HEDs are shocked, brecciated, and have Ar-Ar ages of 3.5-4.1 Gyr consis- tent with impact heating and breccia formation on Vesta during the late heavy bombardment (LHB) [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering
    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Shock Metamorphism and Impact Melting
    5. Shock Metamorphism and Impact Melting ❖❖❖ Shock-metamorphic products have become one of the diagnostic tools of impact cratering studies. They have become the main criteria used to identify structures of impact origin. They have also been used to map the distribution of shock-pressures throughout an impact target. The diverse styles of shock metamorphism include fracturing of crystals, formation of microcrystalline planes of glass through crystals, conversion of crystals to high-pressure polymorphs, conversion of crystals to glass without loss of textural integrity, conversion of crystals to melts that may or may not mix with melts from other crystals. Shock-metamorphism of target lithologies at the crater was first described by Barringer (1905, 1910) and Tilghman (1905), who recognized three different products. The first altered material they identified is rock flour, which they concluded was pulverized Coconino sandstone. Barringer observed that rock flour was composed of fragmented quartz crystals that were far smaller in size than the unaffected quartz grains in normal Coconino sandstone. Most of the pulverized silica he examined passed through a 200 mesh screen, indicating grain sizes <74 µm (0.074 mm), which is far smaller than the 0.2 mm average detrital grain size in normal Coconino (Table 2.1). Fairchild (1907) and Merrill (1908) also report a dramatic comminution of Coconino, although only 50% of Fairchild’s sample of rock flour passed through a 100 mesh screen, indicating grain sizes <149 µm. Heterogeneity of the rock flour is evident in areas where sandstone clasts survive within the rock flour. The rock flour is pervasive and a major component of the debris at the crater.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline of Giant Impacts on Mars by 4.48 Billion Years Ago and an Early Opportunity for Habitability
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0380-0 Decline of giant impacts on Mars by 4.48 billion years ago and an early opportunity for habitability D. E. Moser 1*, G. A. Arcuri1, D. A. Reinhard2, L. F. White 3, J. R. Darling 4, I. R. Barker1, D. J. Larson2, A. J. Irving5, F. M. McCubbin6, K. T. Tait3, J. Roszjar7, A. Wittmann8 and C. Davis1 The timing of the wane in heavy meteorite bombardment of the inner planets is debated. Its timing determines the onset of crustal conditions consistently below the thermal and shock pressure limits for microbiota survival, and so bounds the occur- rence of conditions that allow planets to be habitable. Here we determine this timing for Mars by examining the metamor- phic histories of the oldest known Martian minerals, 4.476–4.429-Gyr-old zircon and baddeleyite grains in meteorites derived from the southern highlands. We use electron microscopy and atom probe tomography to show that none of these grains were exposed to the life-limiting shock pressure of 78 GPa. 97% of the grains exhibit weak-to-no shock metamorphic features and no thermal overprints from shock-induced melting. By contrast, about 80% of the studied grains from bombarded crust on Earth and the Moon show such features. The giant impact proposed to have created Mars’ hemispheric dichotomy must, therefore, have taken place more than 4.48 Gyr ago, with no later cataclysmic bombardments. Considering thermal habitability models, we conclude that portions of Mars’ crust reached habitable pressures and temperatures by 4.2 Gyr ago, the onset of the Martian ‘wet’ period, about 0.5 Gyr earlier than the earliest known record of life on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Way to Confirm Meteorite Impact Produced Planar Features in Quartz: Combining Universal Stage and Electron Backscatter Diffraction Techniques
    A new way to confirm meteorite impact produced planar features in quartz: combining Universal Stage and Electron Backscatter Diffraction techniques M.H. Voorn MSc Thesis August 2010 Utrecht University - Earth Sciences department Structural Geology and Tectonic research group Abstract As recognised from the geological record, meteorite impact events can have a severe influence on (local) geology, climate and life. Solid evidence for these events is therefore important to obtain. The most convincing evidence comes from microstructures in quartz. Upon impact, Planar Fractures (PFs) and Planar Deformation Features (PDFs) form parallel to specific crystallographic planes in quartz. Non-impact formed (tectonic) Deformation Lamellae (DL) may be hard to distinguish qualitatively from PFs or PDFs with the optical microscope, but do not form parallel to crystallographic planes. Quantitative methods using the Universal Stage (U-Stage) on the optical microscope have therefore been applied widely to (dis)confirm this parallelism. With the method, the quartz c-axis and poles to planar features are measured and plotted. An improved technique requires so-called indexing of the measured orientations using a stereographic projection template. Even when these techniques are applied, some proposed impact structures remain debated. An important reason for this is the U-stage can not provide the full crystal orientation of quartz. The goal of this thesis was to check the classical U-stage techniques for quantitatively confirming impact planar features in quartz, and to see whether the addition of Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD, on the Scanning Electron Microscope: SEM) and Cathodoluminescence (CL, on the SEM) can provide more solid evidence. Six previously confirmed impact and three non-impact samples were studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Shocked Monazite Chronometry: Integrating Microstructural and in Situ Isotopic Age Data for Determining Precise Impact Ages
    Contrib Mineral Petrol (2017) 172:11 DOI 10.1007/s00410-017-1328-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Shocked monazite chronometry: integrating microstructural and in situ isotopic age data for determining precise impact ages Timmons M. Erickson1 · Nicholas E. Timms1 · Christopher L. Kirkland1 · Eric Tohver2 · Aaron J. Cavosie1,3 · Mark A. Pearce4 · Steven M. Reddy1 Received: 30 August 2016 / Accepted: 10 January 2017 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Monazite is a robust geochronometer and {110}, {212}, and type two (irrational) twin planes with Abstract ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ occurs in a wide range of rock types. Monazite also records rational shear directions in [011] and [110]. SIMS U–Th– shock deformation from meteorite impact but the effects Pb analyses of the plastically deformed parent domains of impact-related microstructures on the U–Th–Pb sys- reveal discordant age arrays, where discordance scales with tematics remain poorly constrained. We have, therefore, increasing plastic strain. The correlation between discord- analyzed shock-deformed monazite grains from the central ance and strain is likely a result of the formation of fast uplift of the Vredefort impact structure, South Africa, and diffusion pathways during the shock event. Neoblasts in impact melt from the Araguainha impact structure, Brazil, granular monazite domains are strain-free, having grown using electron backscatter diffraction, electron microprobe during the impact events via consumption of strained par- elemental mapping, and secondary ion mass spectrometry ent grains. Neoblastic monazite from the Inlandsee leu- (SIMS). Crystallographic orientation mapping of monazite cogranofels at Vredefort records a 207Pb/206Pb age of grains from both impact structures reveals a similar com- 2010 ± 15 Ma (2σ, n = 9), consistent with previous impact bination of crystal-plastic deformation features, includ- age estimates of 2020 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIC IMPACTS: MS and IRONMENTAL P ONS Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch
    ANIC IMPACTS: MS AND IRONMENTAL P ONS APRIL 15 - APRIL 17, 1999 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, Germany Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch Ber. Polarforsch. 343 (1999) ISSN 01 76 - 5027 Preface .......3 Acknowledgements .......6 Program ....... 7 Abstracts P. Agrinier, A. Deutsch, U. Schäre and I. Martinez: On the kinetics of reaction of CO, with hot Ca0 during impact events: An experimental study. .11 L. Ainsaar and M. Semidor: Long-term effect of the Kärdl impact crater (Hiiumaa, Estonia) On the middle Ordovician carbonate sedimentation. ......13 N. Artemieva and V.Shuvalov: Shock zones on the ocean floor - Numerical simulations. ......16 H. Bahlburg and P. Claeys: Tsunami deposit or not: The problem of interpreting the siliciclastic K/T sections in northeastern Mexico. ......19 R. Coccioni, D. Basso, H. Brinkhuis, S. Galeotti, S. Gardin, S. Monechi, E. Morettini, M. Renard, S. Spezzaferri, and M. van der Hoeven: Environmental perturbation following a late Eocene impact event: Evidence from the Massignano Section, Italy. ......21 I von Dalwigk and J. Ormö Formation of resurge gullies at impacts at sea: the Lockne crater, Sweden. ......24 J. Ebbing, P. Janle, J, Koulouris and B. Milkereit: Palaeotopography of the Chicxulub impact crater and implications for oceanic craters. .25 V. Feldman and S.Kotelnikov: The methods of shock pressure estimation in impacted rocks. ......28 J.-A. Flores, F. J. Sierro and R. Gersonde: Calcareous plankton stratigraphies from the "Eltanin" asteroid impact area: Strategies for geological and paleoceanographic reconstruction. ......29 M.V.Gerasimov, Y. P. Dikov, 0 . I. Yakovlev and F.Wlotzka: Experimental investigation of the role of water in the impact vaporization chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Subsolidus Quartz-Coesite Transformation in Impact Ejecta from the Australasian Tektite Strewn field
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 264 (2019) 105–117 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Evidence for subsolidus quartz-coesite transformation in impact ejecta from the Australasian tektite strewn field Fabrizio Campanale a,b,⇑, Enrico Mugnaioli b, Luigi Folco a, Mauro Gemmi b Martin R. Lee c, Luke Daly c,e,f, Billy P. Glass d a Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita` di Pisa, V. S. Maria 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy b Center for Nanotechnology Innovation@NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy c Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK d Department of Geosciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA e Australian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, NSW, Australia f Space Science and Technology Centre, School of Earth and Planetary Science, Curtin University, Bentley, 6102 WA, Australia Received 1 April 2019; accepted in revised form 11 August 2019; Available online 21 August 2019 Abstract Coesite, a high-pressure silica polymorph, is a diagnostic indicator of impact cratering in quartz-bearing target rocks. The formation mechanism of coesite during hypervelocity impacts has been debated since its discovery in impact rocks in the 1960s. Electron diffraction analysis coupled with scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy of shocked silica grains from the Australasian tektite/microtektite strewn field reveals fine-grained intergrowths of coesite plus quartz bearing planar deformation features (PDFs).À Quartz and euhedral microcrystalline coesite are in direct contact, showing a recurrent pseudo iso-orientation, with the ½111* vector of quartz near parallel to the [0 1 0]* vector of coesite.
    [Show full text]
  • Twinning, Reidite, and Zro in Shocked Zircon from Meteor Crater
    Transformations to granular zircon revealed: Twinning, reidite, and ZrO2 in shocked zircon from Meteor Crater (Arizona, USA) Aaron J. Cavosie1,2,3, Nicholas E. Timms1, Timmons M. Erickson1, Justin J. Hagerty4, and Friedrich Hörz5 1TIGeR (The Institute for Geoscience Research), Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 2NASA Astrobiology Institute, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 3Department of Geology, University of Puerto Rico–Mayagüez, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00681, USA 4U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA 5NASA Johnson Space Center, Science Department/Jets/HX5/ARES, Houston, Texas 77058, USA ABSTRACT Granular zircon in impact environments has long been recognized but remains poorly A N35° 2.0’ W111° 0.9’ understood due to lack of experimental data to identify mechanisms involved in its genesis. Meteor Crater in Arizona (USA) contains abundant evidence of shock metamorphism, includ- N ing shocked quartz, the high-pressure polymorphs coesite and stishovite, diaplectic SiO2 glass, and lechatelierite (fused SiO2). Here we report the presence of granular zircon, a new shocked-mineral discovery at Meteor Crater, that preserve critical orientation evidence of specific transformations that occurred during formation at extreme impact conditions. The zircon grains occur as aggregates of sub-micrometer neoblasts in highly shocked Coconino Sandstone (CS) comprised of lechatelierite. Electron backscatter diffraction shows that each MCC2 site grain consists of multiple domains, some with boundaries disoriented by 65° around <110>, (main shaft) a known {112} shock-twin orientation. Other domains have {001} in alignment with {110} of neighboring domains, consistent with the former presence of the high-pressure ZrSiO4 polymorph reidite.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— Introduction and Discussion
    Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— Introduction and Discussion By J. Wright Horton, Jr., David S. Powars, and Gregory S. Gohn Chapter A of Studies of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure— The USGS-NASA Langley Corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and Related Coreholes and Geophysical Surveys Edited by J. Wright Horton, Jr., David S. Powars, and Gregory S. Gohn Prepared in cooperation with the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Professional Paper 1688 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey iii Contents Abstract . .A1 Introduction . 1 Previous Work . 3 The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure . 5 Form and Structure . 5 Character of the Target . 7 Land Surface Features . 7 The USGS-NASA Langley Core . 9 Significant Results . 11 Crystalline Basement Rocks . 11 Impact-Modified and Impact-Generated Sediments . 11 Postimpact Sediments . 13 Water Depths—Impact and Postimpact . 14 Dating the Impact Event . 14 Structural Interpretation of Seismic Data . 15 Interpretation of Audio-Magnetotelluric (AMT) Soundings . 15 Hydrologic Effects and Water-Resources Implications . 16 Conceptual Model . 16 Acknowledgments . 18 References Cited . 18 Appendix A1. Abstracts of Research on the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure, 2001–2003 . 24 Figures A1. Regional map showing the location of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, the USGS-NASA Langley corehole at Hampton, Va., and some other coreholes in southeastern Virginia . A2 A2. Map of southeastern Virginia showing locations of recently completed coreholes and geophysical surveys in relation to the Chesapeake Bay impact structure . .4 A3. Satellite image of Chesapeake Bay showing location of the buried impact structure and nearby Mesozoic to Cenozoic tectonic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of Impact in Crystalline Rock
    Traces of impact in crystalline rock A summary of processes and products of shock metamorphism in crystalline rock with focus on planar deformation features in feldspars Fredrika Svahn Dissertations in Geology at Lund University, Bachelor’s thesis, no 391 (15 hp/ECTS credits) Department of Geology Lund University 2014 Traces of impact in crystalline rock A summary of processes and products of shock metamorphism in crystalline rock with focus on planar deformation features in feldspars Bachelor’s thesis Fredrika Svahn Department of Geology Lund University 2014 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2 Crater formation ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Crater forming processes 7 2.1.1 Contact/Compression stage 8 2.1.2 Excavation stage 10 2.1.3 Modification stage 10 3 Shock metamorphism of rocks and minerals ................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Impactites 11 3.2 Shock metamorphic features 12 3.3 Megascopic features 12 3.3.1 Shatter cones 12 3.4 Microscopic features 12 3.4.1 Planar structures 12 3.4.2 Planar fractures 12 3.4.3 Planar deformation features 13 3.4.4 Deformation bands 13 3.4.5 High pressure polymorphs 13 3.4.6 Shock mosaicism 13 3.4.7 Diapletic glass 13 3.4.8 Selective mineral melting 13 4 Material & methods ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]