Managing Extreme Water Shortage in Victoria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing Extreme Water Shortage in Victoria Managing extreme water shortage in Victoria Lessons from the Millennium Drought © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/au/deed.en ISBN 978-1-76047-046-3 (pdf) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone DELWP Customer Service Centre 136186, email [email protected], via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Contents Executive summary v Victoria’s water entitlement and planning frameworks vi Victoria’s water resources 1996–2010 vi Managing Victoria’s large regulated systems vii Securing urban water supplies vii Small rural water supply systems viii Qualification of rights ix Beyond 2010 ix 1. Victorian water entitlement and planning frameworks 1 1.1 Supply sources and systems 1 1.2 Victoria’s Water Entitlement Framework 1 1.3 Victoria’s Water Planning Framework 6 1.4 Emergency measures – qualification of rights 10 1.5 Summary 11 2. Victoria’s water resources 1996–2010 12 3. Managing water scarcity in Victoria’s rural regulated systems 18 3.1 How Victoria’s rural regulated systems operate 18 3.2 Sharing available water resources 20 3.3 Maximising water available through system operations and infrastructure modifications 29 3.4 Supplying essential needs on regulated systems 34 3.5 Increasing options for entitlement holders in the medium to long term 40 3.6 Summary 47 4. Securing urban water supplies 49 4.1 Urban supply systems 49 4.2 Performance of urban bulk entitlements 49 4.3 Performance of drought response plans 52 4.4 Demand management 53 4.5 Supply augmentation measures (short and long term) 56 4.6 Summary 64 5. Small rural supply systems 66 5.1 Licences on unregulated streams 66 5.2 Section 8 private rights (unregulated domestic and stock supply) 68 5.3 Groundwater supplies and use during drought 70 5.4 Managing environmental water on unregulated systems 73 5.5 Summary 74 6. Qualifying rights to water 75 6.1 Translating legislation into practice – key principles 75 6.2 Implementation of qualifications since 2006 77 6.3 Managing the impact of qualification of rights 82 6.4 Reviewing and refining the qualification process 85 6.5 Reducing the need to qualify rights in future 88 6.6 Summary 89 Managing extreme water shortage in Victoria Lessons from the Millennium Drought i 7. Beyond 2010 90 7.1 The floods – 2010/11 90 7.2 Statewide streamflow and reservoir levels since 2010 91 7.3 State-wide water resources available since 2010 97 7.4 Reforms coming out of the drought 97 7.5 Planning for future water shortages 101 7.6 The future 103 8. Glossary 104 9. Acronyms 108 10. References and further resources 109 List of tables Table 1.1 Types of entitlements in regulated and unregulated systems 2 Table 2.1 Rainfall reductions across Victoria in 1997–2009 compared with 1900–1996 13 Table 2.2 South-Eastern Australian rainfall anomalies in percentage terms relative to the 1872–2009 long-term mean 14 Table 2.3 Reduction in inflows to water storages July 1997–August 2009 compared to the long-term average 16 Table 3.1 Historical seasonal allocations to high-reliability water shares and low-reliability water shares (LRWS) in northern Victorian systems 21 Table 3.2 Measures undertaken by rural water corporations to reduce system operating losses and increase supply to rural users in declared irrigation systems 29 Table 3.3 Volumes of water carried over across all systems with carryover between 2007 and 2015 41 Table 3.4 Summary of annual allocation trade in Northern Victoria 2007/08 to 2014/15 45 Table 5.1 Total estimated annual groundwater use in Victoria 71 Table 7.1 Total Victorian streamflow compared with long-term average, 2003–04 to 2013–14 92 ii Managing extreme water shortage in Victoria Lessons from the Millennium Drought List of figures Figure 1.1 Victorian Water Entitlement Framework 3 Figure 1.2 EWR –management flexibility and certainty of supply 5 Figure 1.3 Timeframes of the Victorian Water Planning Framework 7 Figure 1.4 Relationship between short and long-term urban supply planning 8 Figure 2.1 Australian rainfall deciles from 1 October 1996 to 31 January 2010 12 Figure 2.2 Annual rainfall across Victoria – droughts compared to long-term average 13 Figure 2.3 Difference in annual mean temperature from long-term average in Victoria (1910–2009) 14 Figure 2.4 Severity of Millennium Drought compared to World War II and Federation droughts 15 Figure 2.5 Number of months per year with rainfall above the 90th percentile 15 Figure 3.1 Victoria’s regulated water supply systems 19 Figure 3.2 Historic allocation hierarchy for historic system operations and reserve rules 23 Figure 3.3 Progression of irrigation allocations in northern Victoria 2007/08 23 Figure 3.4 Allocation hierarchy for systems with new reserve rules 25 Figure 3.5 Options for using consumptive water en route in the lower Broken Creek 39 Figure 3.6 Volume of water carried over on Murray and Goulburn systems between 2007 and 2015 41 Figure 3.7 Timeline of carryover reform 43 Figure 3.8 High-reliability water share transfers in northern Victoria 2008/09 to 2014/15 44 Figure 3.9 Change in high-reliability water shares linked to land, by area, 2001 to 2015 45 Figure 4.1 Number of Victorian towns on water restrictions and the severity of restrictions 53 Figure 4.2 Water restriction levels (post uniform drought restriction guidelines) 54 Figure 5.1 Total number of streams on restrictions or bans (2003–2015) 67 Figure 5.2 Section 8 private rights for domestic and stock water use 68 Figure 5.3 Emergency water supply point network (2007/08) 69 Figure 6.1 Rivers subject to qualification of rights, overlaid with rainfall deciles 77 Figure 7.1 Volume of water in Victoria’s major storages 91 Figure 7.2 Levels in major Victorian water supply systems, December 2015 92 Figure 7.3 Annual streamflow in the Wimmera River at Glynwylln 93 Figure 7.4 Volume in Glenelg-Wimmera major storages 93 Figure 7.5 Annual streamflow in the Campaspe River at Rochester 94 Figure 7.6 Volume in Lake Eppalock 94 Figure 7.7 Annual streamflow in the Goulburn River at Dohertys 95 Figure 7.8 Annual inflows to Melbourne’s main harvesting reservoirs 95 Figure 7.9 Volume in Melbourne Water Corporation storages 96 Figure 7.10 Annual streamflow in the Mitchell River at Glenaladale 96 Figure 7.11 Victoria’s framework for planning for future water shortages 102 Managing extreme water shortage in Victoria Lessons from the Millennium Drought iii List of case studies Case study 3.1: Collaborative contingency planning in northern Victoria 24 Case study 3.2: Water to operate the Goulburn system 26 Case study 3.3: Thomson drought reserve 28 Case study 3.4: Pumping dead storage at Waranga Basin 31 Case study 3.5: Modernising the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District – the Goulburn-Murray Water Connections Project 33 Case study 3.6: Emergency supply to Wimmera-Mallee domestic and stock customers 35 Case study 3.7: Drought refuge and environmental watering in the Boort Wetlands 37 Case study 3.8: Murray hardyhead 38 Case study 3.9: Unprecedented low inflows drive trade in the Latrobe Valley 46 Case study 4.1: Maintaining supplies to South Gippsland towns 50 Case study 4.2: Buying time for Wangaratta 56 Case study 4.3: Water carting for Broadford, Sunday Creek system 57 Case study 4.4: Alternative supplies and interconnections for greater Geelong 58 Case study 4.5: Bushfires and floods create Emergency in Mitchell basin 58 Case study 4.6: Recycled water in Campaspe basin 59 Case study 4.7: How recreation returned to Lake Wendouree 60 Case study 4.8: Winter diversions to meet east Gippsland demand 62 Case study 4.9: Connections work for north-east towns 62 Case study 4.10: Superpipe delivers a more reliable water supply to Ballarat and Bendigo 63 Case study 6.1: Qualification of rights in the Goulburn system 2009/10 79 Case study 6.2: Different access for Coliban customers 80 Case study 6.3: Moving water between systems 81 Case study 6.4: Beneficiary pays on the Thomson 84 Case study 6.5: Yarra River – environmental risk assessment 85 Case study 6.6: Special rules protect Loddon environment 87 Case study 6.7: Withholding passing flows in the Campaspe system 87 Case study 6.8: Emergency plan for towns on the Maribyrnong 88 iv Managing extreme water shortage in Victoria Lessons from the Millennium Drought Executive summary Australia is renowned for its highly variable climate and this is demonstrated in the rainfall records for Australia that go back more than 100 years.
Recommended publications
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Major Rivers
    WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss AAnn IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn ttoo iinntteerrnnaattiioonnaall wwwwwwaatteerr llaawwwwww wwwwwwiitthh ccaassee ssttuuddiieess THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss An introduction to international water law with case studies Colorado River Commission of Nevada 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 486-2670 Website: http://crc.nv.gov November 2008 Jacob (Jay) D. Bingham, Chairman Ace I. Robinson, Vice Chairman Andrea Anderson, Commissioner Marybel Batjer, Commissioner Chip Maxfield, Commissioner George F. Ogilvie III, Commissioner Lois Tarkanian, Commissioner George M. Caan, Executive Director Primary Author: Daniel Seligman, Attorney at Law Columbia Research Corp. P.O. Box 99249 Seattle, Washington 98139 (206) 285-1185 Project Editors: McClain Peterson, Project Manager Manager, Natural Resource Division Colorado River Commission of Nevada Sara Price Special Counsel-Consultant Colorado River Commission of Nevada Esther Valle Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada Nicole Everett Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK World’s Major Rivers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Daniel Seligman at the Columbia Research Corp. wishes to thank Jacqueline Pruner, attorney at law in Seattle, for her contribution to the section on water law in Canada and her valuable editing assistance throughout the entire document. The staff at the Murray-Darling Basin Commission and Goulburn-Murray Water in Australia provided important information about the Murray-Darling River system, patiently answered the author’s questions, and reviewed the draft text on water trading. Staff at the International Joint Commission in Washington, D.C., and the Prairie Provinces Water Board in Regina, Canada, also offered helpful comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • River Murray Operations | Murray–Darling Basin Authority August 2020
    River Murray Key facts The River Murray is Australia’s longest operations river and flows for more than 2500 kilometres through New South The River Murray flows through New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. Wales, Victoria and South Australia, sustaining rural towns and communities, supporting Several major rivers join the Murray, including the agricultural production and nourishing many Goulburn, Murrumbidgee unique Australian plants and animals. and Darling, and many smaller rivers and MDBA River Operations is responsible for operating the tributaries on its westward River Murray on behalf of the joint governments of New journey to the sea. South Wales (NSW), Victoria and South Australia. Key water regulation assets under control of the MDBA The Murray–Darling Basin include Dartmouth Dam, Hume Dam, Yarrawonga Weir, Agreement (the Agreement) Torrumbarry Weir, Lake Victoria and the locks and weirs sets out the water sharing from Lock 15 at Euston to Lock 7 at Rufus River. rules across the states. The MDBA determines the volume of water released to meet demands, but does not own any water and can only The main storages in the release water from storage when there are state orders or River Murray are system demands to be met. Dartmouth Dam, Hume Dam, Yarrawonga Weir The physical operation of structures is managed by water and Lake Victoria. authorities in each state. This includes Menindee Lakes on the Darling River, which contributes some water for use in the Murray system, but is managed by the NSW Other major storages Government. Additionally, the MDBA does not operate the connected to the system River Murray downstream of the South Australian border, (but not the responsibility where the South Australian Government take on this role.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. Statement of Heritage Impacts
    Hume Battery Energy Storage System Environmental Impact Statement Appendix F. Statement of Heritage Impacts Hume Battery Energy Storage System Statement of Heritage Impact IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI | Final 28 July 2020 Meridian Energy Australia Statement of Heritage Impact Meridian Energy Australia Statement of Heritage Impact Hume Battery Energy Storage System Project No: IA213400 Document Title: Statement of Heritage Impact Document No.: IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI Revision: Final Date: 28 July 2020 Client Name: Meridian Energy Australia Project Manager: Thomas Muddle Author: Deborah Farina File Name: IA213400 Hume BESS SOHI_Final Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 7, 177 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia PO Box 632 North Sydney NSW 2059 Australia T +61 2 9928 2100 F +61 2 9928 2444 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI i Statement of Heritage Impact Contents Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • West Gippsland Floodplain Management Strategy 2018
    WEST GIPPSLAND CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY West Gippsland Floodplain Management Strategy 2018 - 2027 Disclaimer Acknowledgements This publication may be of assistance to you but The development of this West Gippsland the West Gippsland Catchment Management Floodplain Management Strategy has involved Authority (WGCMA) and its employees do not the collective effort of a number of individuals guarantee that the publication is without flaw and organisations. of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your Primary author – Linda Tubnor (WGCMA) particular purpose. It therefore disclaims all Support and technical input – WGCMA liability for any error, loss or other consequence Board (Jane Hildebrant, Ian Gibson, Courtney which may arise from you relying on any Mraz), Martin Fuller (WGCMA), Adam Dunn information in this publication. (WGCMA), Catherine Couling (WGCMA), Copyright and representatives from VICSES, Bass Coast Shire Council, Baw Baw Shire Council, Latrobe © West Gippsland Catchment Management City Council, South Gippsland Shire Council, Authority Wellington Shire Council, East Gippsland First published 2017. This publication is Shire Council, East Gippsland Catchment copyright. No part may be reproduced by any Management Authority, DELWP, Bunurong process except in accordance with the provisions Land Council, Gunaikurnai Land and Waters of the Copyright Act 1968. Aboriginal Corporation and Boon Wurrung Foundation. Accessibility Acknowledgement of Country This document is available in alternative formats upon request. We would like to acknowledge and pay our respects to the Traditional Land Owners and other indigenous people within the catchment area: the Gunaikurnai, The Bunurong and Boon Wurrung, and the Wurundjeri people. We also recognise the contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and organisations in Land and Natural Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents
    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................3 3.5 Healthy Ecosystems ...........................................24 1. Objectives of the Plan ..........................................4 3.5.1 Native Flora and Fauna ............................24 2. Context .......................................................................4 3.5.2 Foreshore Vegetation Management .........25 3.5.3 Pest and Nuisance Plants ........................26 2.1 Lake Eildon Development ....................................4 3.5.4 Pest Animals .............................................27 2.2 Lake Eildon as a Water Supply ............................4 3.5.5 References ...............................................27 2.3 Storage Operations ..............................................5 2.4 Land Status ...........................................................5 3.6 Land Management ..............................................28 2.5 Legal Status ..........................................................5 3.6.1 Permits, Licences and Lease Arrangements ................................28 2.6 Study Area .............................................................5 3.6.2 Fire ............................................................29 3. A Plan for the Management 3.6.3 Foreshore Erosion ....................................30 of Lake Eildon ..........................................................5 3.6.4 Stream Bank Erosion ................................31 3.1 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Condition of Rivers and Streams in the Latrobe, Thomson and Avon Catchments
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF RIVERS AND STREAMS IN THE LATROBE, THOMSON AND AVON CATCHMENTS Publication 832 March 2002 1 INTRODUCTION activities have contributed to a significant change in the quantity and quality of water delivered to Lake This publication provides an overview of the Wellington and there is a significant amount of environmental condition of the rivers and streams in public concern regarding impacts on the health of the Latrobe, Thomson and Avon catchments1 (Figure the Gippsland Lakes. 1). The Latrobe and Thomson river systems, for The Latrobe, Thomson and Avon catchments contain example, contribute approximately twice the some of Victoria’s most significant river systems. nutrient inputs to the Gippsland Lakes than all other Located in the Gippsland region of Victoria, these riverine inputs. The most significant nutrient loading three river systems form the total catchment of Lake is associated with high flow events and reflects the Wellington, the western-most of the Gippsland increased surface runoff and erosion caused Lakes. The demands on these freshwater resources through land clearance and urbanisation. are considerable. Australia’s largest pulp and paper It is commonly agreed that the only long-term mill, most of the State’s power industry, much of solution for improving the condition of Lake Melbourne’s water supply and the State’s second Wellington is to significantly reduce the nutrient largest irrigation district fall within their catchment loads from the Latrobe and Thomson river systems. boundaries. Restoration of the catchments to a more sustainable Much change has occurred in these catchments land use, revegetating riparian zones and reducing since early settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Dams in Victoria Safe and Versatile Infrastructure
    Dams in Victoria Safe and versatile infrastructure A dam is a wall that holds back water to form a basin, lake or reservoir. Dams are typically made of earth, rock or concrete. Dams can be privately owned, owned by business or a Government agency. They can be used to store water for drinking, industry or farming, to protect property from flooding, or for recreation. Dams in Victoria Victoria has about 450,000 dams – this number shows how important dams are to the economy and our way of life. The sizes of our dams range from major storages such as Dartmouth dam (about 4,000,000 ML), Lake Eildon (about 3,300,000 ML) and the Thomson dam (about 1,070,000 Farm dams ML) to small swimming pool-sized dams on farms or lifestyle properties. These smaller privately-owned dams are the most Generating power: these large dams hold water for cooling common type of dam in Victoria. Together, Victoria’s dams have coal or gas-fired power stations or to generate hydro-electric a total storage capacity of about 13,400,000 ML. power. How we use our dams Recreation: some of the lakes created by dams are used for recreational activities such as boating and fishing. These dams Dams have huge social, economic and environmental benefits. can be popular tourist destinations and the tourism generated The vast majority of dams in Victoria have been built to store by these dams can be important to the social and economic rainfall when it is plentiful for use in times when it is most wellbeing of regional communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bass Coast Shire, Mainland the Gurdies Nature Reserve
    Bass Coast Shire, Mainland The Gurdies Nature Reserve to Melbourne S Cardinia 1 O U 1 T Shire GURD H Pioneer IES - ST This reserve protects one of the few significant Western Bay H E Port L I E Y Quarry R RD remnants of coastal woodland on Western Port. W H B Jam Jerrup A S S The Gurdies There is a small wayside stop opposite Pioneer Bay on S A S B Nature GIP Conservation the Bass Highway. Another access point is via PSL AND Reserve Dunbabbin Road, off Stuart’s Road. There is a good French Island H W Grantville D UN parking area with magnificent views over Western Port. BA Y B B H R I RD W D N Near the top of the main trail a side track to the north Y R IE G The L U E 2 leads to a gully where Bassian Thrush, Rufous Fantail and H D R ST. R Pier D Gurdies Boat Ramp I E S- er Eastern Whipbirds can be found. S Pioneer Bay T v S . H - i M A R Western Port E R Y 1 L O T I Y H E R N Woodleigh E D RD U N B W A T O R B R O Other birds seen in The Gurdies Nature D B A D . Grantville IN LEIGH-ST HELIER R W D Western Port E D GU Tenby T R ST Y RD GR S Kernot Reserve include parrots, thornbills, robins, AN T T 2 Point V FF S Y IL O T N L N W E O GUY - U treecreepers, sittellas and honeyeaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desalination: Melbourne Water Supply and Development Choices in the Twenty-First Century
    Drought and Desalination: Melbourne water supply and development choices in the twenty-first century Author Porter, Michael G, Downie, David, Scarborough, Helen, Sahin, Oz, Stewart, Rodney A Published 2015 Journal Title Desalination and Water Treatment Version Accepted Manuscript (AM) DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.959743 Copyright Statement © 2014 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Desalination and Water Treatment on 09 Oct 2014, available online: http:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19443994.2014.959743 Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/65114 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au TDWT 959743 CE: AS QA: RB 3 September 2014 Initial Coll: QC: Desalination and Water Treatment XX (2014) XX–XX www.deswater.com XXXX doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.959743 Drought and Desalination: Melbourne water supply and development choices in the twenty-first century Michael G. Porter*, David Downie, Helen Scarborough, Oz Sahin, Rodney A. Stewart Deakin University City Centre, 3rd Floor, 550 Bourke St., Melbourne 3000, Australia, Tel. +61 3 5227 8424; 5 email: [email protected] Received 16 April 2014; Accepted 16 June 2014 10 ABSTRACT Sharply reduced catchment inflows across Australia around the end of the twentieth Century led to a sequence of water restrictions followed, as the drought persisted, by approximately $10 billion of investments in desalination plants near Perth, Adelaide, AQ1 Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. This Deakin University project jointly with Griffith 15 University, for the National Centre of Excellence in Desalination (NCEDA), follows these new investments. We ask how best to manage bulk water supply and retail supply given the facts and fears of uncertain rainfall, modelled over a 100 year simulation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Options for Melbourne
    Submission to the Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into Melbourne’s Water Supply Water supply options for Melbourne An examination of costs and availabilities of new water supply sources for Melbourne and other urban areas in Victoria Alan Moran Director, Deregulation Unit, Institute of Public Affairs Institute of Public Affairs Occassional Paper, revised August 2008 Water supply options for Melbourne Summary greenfield developments. Recycling Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) water appears to be prohibitively costly, while Melbourne’s water supply is suffering from a combination releasing treated water and substituting it for other sources of drought and a failure to build new storage facilities over is also expensive. Some variations of household rainwater the past 23 years when the population has increased by tanks rival the Wonthaggi desalination plant proposal in over 30 per cent. These matters may be aggravated by providing the most expensive solutions. Less expensive is long term climate change diminishing the precipitation to the government’s Sugarloaf approach, but this still entails the traditional sources in the Melbourne catchment. water costing two and a half times that from a new dam in The government policy of matching supply and the Melbourne catchment. demand has been, and largely remains, directed at The table below summarises the estimated costs measures that curtail demand; supply side measures and potential additional water supplies from the more have focused on tapping local sources, mainly through realistic options available. A major new Gippsland dam household water tanks. Additional supply sources have is the lowest cost option, though a river diversion into the been proposed over the past year or so.
    [Show full text]