London Ambulance Service NHS Trust London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report London Ambulance Service NHS Trust London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD Date of inspection visit: 7-9 February and 17 24 25 Tel:Tel: 020 7921 5100 February 2017 Website:www.londonambulance.nhs.uk Date of publication: 29/06/2017 This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this provider. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, other information know to CQC and information given to us from patients, the public and other organisations. Ratings Overall rating for this Requires improvement ambulance location ––– Emergency and urgent care services Requires improvement ––– Emergency operations centre Requires improvement ––– Resilience planning Good ––– Are acute services at this trust safe? Requires improvement ––– Are acute services at this trust effective? Good ––– Are acute services at this trust caring? Outstanding – Are acute services at this trust responsive? Good ––– Are acute services at this trust well-led? Requires improvement ––– 1 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report 29/06/2017 Summary of findings Letter from the Chief Inspector of Hospitals London Ambulance Service NHS Trust covers the capital the June 2015 inspection. We did not rate the August city of the United Kingdom, over an area covering 2016 inspection because we did not consider all of the approximately 620 square miles. The service is provided key lines of enquiry due to the focused approach of the to a population of around 8.6 million people, and over 30 inspection. million annual visitors. London Ambulance Service NHS We inspected LAS as part of our planned, comprehensive Trust (LAS) was established in 1965 from nine previously inspection programme. Our inspection took place on 7, 8 existing services, and became an NHS Trust on 1 April & 9 February 2017, with unannounced visits on 17, 24 & 25 1996. February 2017. We looked at three core services: access The trust provides an emergency and urgent care (EUC) via Emergency Operations Centres (EOC), EUC, and the service to respond to 999 calls, which are received and Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response managed by the trusts emergency operations centre (EPRR), which included its two hazardous area response (EOC). Staff working in EOC provide clinical advice over teams (HART). The 111 service provided by the trust had the telephone, and dispatch emergency vehicles where been inspected recently, and we included the ratings required. The LAS also provides resilience and hazardous from that inspection in our overall aggregation of the area response teams (HART), which all NHS organisations service. have been required to have since April 2013. LAS plays a We did not inspect the patient transport services on this crucial role in the national arrangements for emergency occasion. The commercial training services were not preparedness, resilience and inspected as these do not form part of the trust’s response,(EPRR),contributing to a co-ordinated and registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) planned response to major incidents through the local health resilience partnerships (LHRPs). There are two LAS During the inspection we visited ambulance premises as Hazardous Area Response Team (HART), one based in well as hospital locations in order to speak to patients Hounslow and the other in Tower Hamlets. In addition, and staff about the ambulance service. LAS provides a patient transport services (PTS). Overall, we rated this trust as requires improvement. Services are managed from the trust’s main headquarters We rated the trust as being good for delivering in Waterloo, and annexes in Bow and Pocock Street. The an effective and responsive service to the needs of the trust also offers the following services: First Aid Training to population it serves. organisations and the public, and Community First Responders (volunteers trained by LAS to provide We rated safety and the well-led domain as requires life-saving treatment). improvement. The trust uses a command and control Computer Aided People reported and we observed staff go the extra mile. Dispatch (CAD) system to manage all calls into the There were examples when people reported the care they Emergency Operations Centre. In the year 2015-2016, LAS received exceeded their expectations. received 1.86 million 999 calls into its two operations There was a strong, visible person-centred culture. Staff centres. were highly motivated and inspired to offer care that was The trust had previously been inspected in June 2015, kind and promoted people’s dignity. Relationships where we rated Emergency and Urgent Care (EUC) and between people who used the service, those close to Resilience Planning as inadequate. The Emergency them and staff was strong, caring and supportive. Staff Operations Centre was rated as requires improvement. A recognised and respected the totality of people’s needs. follow up inspection undertaken in August 2016 found They always took people’s personal, cultural, social and progress had been made with regard to the requirements religious needs into account. For these reasons, we rated we had set out in a warning notice issued as a result of the trust outstanding for the caring domain. 2 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report 29/06/2017 Summary of findings Our key findings were as follows: • Whilst significant work had been undertaken to increase front-line ambulance staff, we were not assured all Safety: ambulance crew were allocated to response vehicles • Whilst there had been improved mechanisms for appropriately. Inexperienced crew were sometimes identifying, reporting and investigating incidents, there paired together and solo first responders were not always remained a level of inconsistency in staffs perception of paramedics. As a result patient care and treatment was what constituted an incident and the reporting of such in delayed when backup support was required. all three services. As a result the trust was not always able • Patient records provided detailed information to to capture important data, which could identify trends support handover at local hospitals, as well as an audit and common themes across the organisation. trail from call handler on-wards. Records were accurately • Learning from incidents had improved but, was kept and stored securely. happening in an ad-hoc way, and as a result was not not Effective: yet fully embedded in practice across all areas of the service. Whilst the executive team had clear methods for • Significant improvements had been made in Emergency communicating learning, staff reported they did not Preparedness Resilience and Response, demonstrated always have time to read updates. through staff adherence with its agreed formal framework, and compliance with national standards. • Mandatory safety training was not meeting the trusts Response times to incidents classified as a HART own targets, and as a result, there was a risk of staff not response had been met. being updated with regard to the latest safety practices. • Staff ensured patients consented to treatment and care • The systems and processes for safeguarding people who where able, and recognised where the best interests of were vulnerable as a result of their circumstances were the patient had to be considered where the situation clearly set out, and staff we spoke with were aware of indicated a response from staff without formal consent. safeguarding and how to recognise and report abuse or neglect. • Staff had good induction procedures and access to training. The trust was supporting staff to enhance their • Infection prevention and control measures had been roles through additional responsibilities and expanded established. Despite this, standards of compliance with roles, such as clinical team leader and advanced protocols varied across the organisation. This was paramedic practitioner. The introduction of the in-house compounded further by the lack of staff awareness of academy provided an opportunity for staff to progress to standards, possibly attributed to non-completion of the paramedic role. required training, and a lack of basic essential items to support practices. • Staff were supported to access training and development opportunities, and had their skills and • A number of ambulance vehicles needed internal repair, competencies assessed. The performance review of staff which prevented a good level of cleanliness from being through an annual appraisal levels had improved, achieved. although the completion rates did not yet meet the trust • There was some inconsistency in undertaking the target. required safety checks of vehicles and equipment,some • Staff used evidence-based guidance to ensure patients of which was attributed to time factors at the start of were appropriately assessed, risks were identified and shifts. managed. The provision of care, advice and treatment • Significant improvement in medicine management had reflected national clinical and medical guidance been achieved over the past few months. There remained standards. For example, there were pathways of care to an issue related to the tracking and tracing of medicines, assess and respond to deteriorating patients. These which was still not sufficiently robust with regard to safe included suspected stroke, chest pain, and trauma. storage and tracking. However, 3 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Quality Report 29/06/2017 Summary of findings • The trust was not meeting the national performance • A small number of ambulance crew who were
Recommended publications
  • UK Ambulance Service Pre-Registration Programmes 64677 Ambulance Trust Reportv3:63630 Annualmon 27/1/11 16:34 Page B
    64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page A Review of approval and monitoring 2007–10 UK ambulance service pre-registration programmes 64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page B Contents Introduction 2 About us (the Health Professions Council) 2 Our main functions 2 Brief overview of the approval and monitoring processes 2 About this document 3 Review of approval activities 5 Background to the programme of visits 5 Preparation for the programme of visits 6 Outcomes of visits 6 The evidence base 6 The impact on resources and timeframes for the approval process 7 Feedback from ambulance services 10 Time taken to complete approval process 11 Communication and information 11 Pre-visit stage 12 The visit 14 The post-visit stage 14 Education provider feedback conclusions 15 Standards of education and training 15 Standards of proficiency 19 Standards of proficiency: further analysis 21 Conclusions on SOPs data 24 Conclusions from the review of visits 24 IHCD as a curriculum-setting body 25 64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page 1 Review of annual monitoring activities 26 The history leading to the annual monitoring of pre-registration education and training delivered by UK ambulance services 26 Brief overview of the annual monitoring process 26 Outcomes from the UK ambulance service annual monitoring process 27 Evidence base 27 The impact on resources and timeframes for the annual monitoring process 27 Standards of education and training 29 Analysis of Visitor comments
    [Show full text]
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
    London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Medical Directorate Executive Office Headquarters 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD Tel: 020 7783 2083 IMPORTANT INFORMATION 13 September 2019. TO: Emergency Departments Pan London. FROM: London Ambulance Service. Re: Inter-Facility Transfers Dear Colleagues, Every day there are many occasions when ambulance trusts are required to undertake an urgent or emergency conveyance of a patient as a result of a call from a healthcare professional (HCP) or from a healthcare facility (IFT). Currently the process for these transfers is subject to local arrangements. As a component of the ARP two new national frameworks for the ambulance trust response to HCP and IFT requests for ambulance attendance and conveyance have been drafted by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and approved in collaboration with ambulance commissioners, NHS England and NHS Improvement and other key stakeholders. The purpose of these frameworks is to support the development of local agreements that are more consistent nationally and which provide HCP and IFT requested conveyance in a timeframe that is equitable with other patients accessing 999 ambulance services. IFT New Process and Standards There are now 4 levels of inter-facility response. IFT Level 1 (IFT1) Category 1 This level of response should be reserved for those exceptional circumstances when a facility is unable to provide immediate life-saving clinical intervention such as resuscitation or in the case of a declared obstetric emergency and requires the clinical assistance of the ambulance service in addition to a transporting resource. These requests should be made by phoning 999 where the call will be triaged by the ambulance service.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell Lobjoit MET00014397.Pdf
    OFFICIAL Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Form MG11(T) Page 1 of 17 WITNESS STATEMENT Criminal Procedure Rules, r27.2; Criminal Justice Act 1967, s.9; Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, s.5b Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Age if under 18: Over 18 (if over 18 insert 'over 18') Occupation: HART OPERATIVE This statement (consisting of 17 page(s) each signed by me)is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have wilfully stated in it anything which I know to be false, or do not believe to be true. Signature: R LOBJOIT Date: 29/03/2018 Tick if witness evidence is visually recorded El (supply witness details on rear) This is my account of the fire that occurred at Grenfell Tower on WEDNESDAY 14 JUNE 2017. I will mention a number of people all of whom work for the LAS. CAD 247/14JUNE201 7 On THURSDAY 29th MARCH 2018 I was interviewed by DC Nay JOHAL and PC Gemma RYAN at LONDON AMBULANCE SERVICE HART BASE,ISLE WORTH. Below is a detailed summary of my account. I was able to refer to my notes and an event log, reference 0483-2000, whilst providing this statement to Police. I will refer to the following item in this statement, which I exhibit: • RSL/01 — Map of area around Grenfell Tower • RSL/02 — One(1) disc containing 26 photographs of incident at Grenfell Tower • RSL/03 — Notes I made after attendance at Grenfell Tower I have been in the LONDON AMBULANCE SERVICE(LAS) for almost thirteen(13) years, starting as Signature: R LOBJOIT Signature witnessed by: 2018 OFFICIAL MET00014397_0001 OFFICIAL Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Form MG11(T) Page 2 of 17 a paramedic technician.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the London Ambulance Service a Strategic Review
    Health and Public Services Committee The future of the London Ambulance Service A strategic review December 2011 Health and Public Services Committee The future of the London Ambulance Service A strategic review December 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority December 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-481-4 This publication is printed on recycled paper Cover photograph courtesy of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Health and Public Services Committee Members Victoria Borwick (Chair) Conservative Navin Shah (Deputy Chair) Labour Richard Barnbrook Independent Richard Barnes Conservative Andrew Boff Conservative Nicky Gavron Labour The Health and Public Services Committee agreed the following terms of reference for a review of the London Ambulance Service in March 2011: To examine the operational, financial and organisational challenges facing the London Ambulance Service and consider how these can be met; To consider what role the Mayor of London should have in relation to the governance, commissioning and delivery of the London Ambulance Service. The Committee would welcome feedback on this report. For further information contact Richard Berry on 020 7983 4199 or [email protected]. For media enquiries contact Lisa Moore on [email protected] or Julie Wheldon on [email protected], or phone 020 7983 4228. Contents Chair’s foreword 7 Executive summary 9 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 7 July Review Committee
    cover2.qxd 5/26/06 3:41 pm Page 1 Report of the 7 July Review Committee - Volume 2 Volume - Committee Report of the 7 July Review Report of the 7 July Review Committee Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 June 2006 Minicom 020 7983 4458 LA/May 06/SD D&P Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Contents Page Transcript of hearing on 3 November 2005 3 Transport for London, Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service Transcript of hearing on 1 December 2005 Telecommunications companies: BT, O2, Vodafone, Cable & Wireless 61 Communication with businesses: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry 90 and Metropolitan Police Service Transcript of hearing on 11 January 2006 Local authorities: Croydon Council (Local Authority Gold on 7 July), Camden 109 Council, Tower Hamlets Council and Westminster City Council Health Service: NHS London, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Great Ormond 122 Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital and Royal College of Nursing Media: Sky News, BBC News, BBC London, ITV News, LBC News & Heart 132 106.2, Capital Radio and London Media Emergency Forum, Evening Standard, The Times Transcript of hearing on 1 March 2006 147 Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Written submissions from organisations Metropolitan Police 167 City of London Police 175 London Fire Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17
    Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17 Contents 1. Performance report ................................................................. 4 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 4 About Us ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Our services .................................................................................................................................. 5 Our vision, purpose and values .................................................................................................... 6 Key issues ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Performance Analysis ............................................................................................... 8 Our Patients ............................................................................................................... 8 Caring for our most seriously ill and injured patients .................................................................... 8 Caring for patients with urgent care needs ................................................................................. 10 Improving our care ...................................................................................................................... 11 Listening
    [Show full text]
  • Update on LFC Support to the London Ambulance Service During the Pandemic
    Decision title Update on LFC Support to the London Ambulance Service during the Pandemic Recommendation by Decision Number Deputy Commissioner LFC-0467-D Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary Report LFC-0467 seeks the agreement of the London Fire Commissioner (LFC) to provide continuing support to the London Ambulance Service (LAS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, the LFC agreed to provide assistance to the LAS due to the significant rise in the demand on that service which the LAS was unable to meet. That provision has continued throughout, but the number of personnel deployed by the LFC has reduced over time. The LAS has now requested a significant level of renewed support in the region of 100 personnel for a period of approximately three months due to an increase in Covid related calls. In view of the effluxion of time and the changing circumstances since the original decision, the risks and benefits for the LFC and the London communities it serves are re-evaluated in this report. The recommendation is that the LAS requested support be provided, as far as possible, possibly moving to a different model of provision in the future, and that the arrangement be underpinned by a formal arrangement that includes the full reimbursement of the costs to the LFC in order to protect the Brigade in the increasingly challenging financial environment. The support to the LAS involves watch-based personnel (firefighters, leading firefighters, sub-officers and station officers) who have volunteered to do so working with the LAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2017/18 1 Contents Section 1 - Performance report 1 Chair’s foreword ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Chief Executive’s foreword ........................................................................................... 4 3 About us ....................................................................................................................... 5 4 Our patients .................................................................................................................. 7 5 Our people .................................................................................................................. 11 6 Our partners ................................................................................................................ 16 7 Quality and performance ............................................................................................ 18 8 Developing our five-year strategy ............................................................................... 24 Section 2 - Accountability report 9 Annual governance statement .................................................................................... 25 10 Remuneration report ................................................................................................... 37 11 Staff report .................................................................................................................. 44 Section 3 - Financial report 12 Financial statements ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 June 2021 Dear Andrew Blake-Herbert, I Am Writing to Provide You with an Update on Some Developments the Trust Is Undertaking
    Operations Directorate Headquarters 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD 7 June 2021 Tel: 020 7783 2000 www.londonambulance.nhs.uk Dear Andrew Blake-Herbert, I am writing to provide you with an update on some developments the Trust is undertaking to further improve the high quality, urgent and emergency care we provide to Havering and the surrounding area. As you will know from our 2018-2021 Strategy, we outlined our ambition to become a world-class ambulance service for a world-class city through seven enabling strategies, one of which is the transformation of our operations and estate to ensure it is fit for the modern 21st Century. We recognised that our estate comprised of an eclectic mix of property inherited and accumulated over many years, much of which dated back to the Victorian times of horse-drawn ambulances in 1880s, and was not fit for purpose in a modern, world-class city. In driving forward our strategy and taking on board the recommendations from Lord Carter’s review into ‘Operational productivity and performance in English NHS ambulance trusts: unwarranted variation’, we published our ‘Estates Vision’ in 2019 which detailed how we plan to overhaul our estate by replacing our existing 68 stations with a network of circa 18 state-of-the-art Ambulance Deployment Centres, operating under a new ‘Hub and Spoke’ model. These Ambulance Deployment Centres, which will be supported by strategically located standby points and rest and refreshment posts for our staff and volunteers across London, aim to have modern, fit for purpose facilities for all of our staff and volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC)
    JHOSC – 23 January 2018 Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) MINUTES Tuesday 23 January 2017 – 9:30am – Council Chamber, Ealing Town Hall Chairman: Councillor Mel Collins (LB Hounslow) Councillors: Councillor Barbara Arzymanow (Westminster CC) Councillor Michael Borio (LB Harrow) Councillor John Coombs (LB Richmond) Councillor Daniel Crawford (LB Ealing) Councillor Shaida Mehrban (LB Hounslow) Councillor Theresa Mullins (LB Ealing) Councillor Rory Vaughan (LB Hammersmith & Fulham) 1. Welcome and Introductions (Agenda Item 1) The start of the meeting was delayed until 9:40am to allow time for members to arrive. The Chair then invited Councillor Daniel Crawford of London Borough of Ealing to welcome the attendees to Ealing Town Hall. 2. Apologies for Absence (Agenda Item 2) Apologies were received from Councillor Ketan Sheth (LB Brent), Councillor Freeman (RB Kensington & Chelsea), Councillor Catherine Faulks (RB Kensington & Chelsea), Councillor Vina Mithani (LB Harrow), Councillor Sharon Holder (LB Hammersmith & Fulham) and Councillor Jonathan Glanz (Westminster City Council). 1 JHOSC – 23 January 2018 3. Declarations of Interest (Agenda Item 3) There were none. 4. Minutes of the meeting held on 5 December 2017 (Agenda Item 4) Consideration was given to the minutes of the previous meeting of the Committee which had taken place on 5 December 2017. The Chair advised the Committee that a series of amendments had already been tabled; these were not substantial changes, merely adjustments to inaccuracies. The Committee requested that the amended version be emailed to them for agreement. Resolved: That the minutes of the previous meeting of the Committee held on 5 December 2017 be agreed, subject to the satisfactory receipt of the amended version, as a true and correct record.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts 2018-19
    Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 Our vision Building a world-class ambulance service for a world-class city London’s primary integrator of access to urgent and emergency care on scene • on phone • online Our purpose We exist to: Provide outstanding care for all of our patients Be a first class employer, valuing and developing the skills, diversity and quality of life of our people Provide the best possible value for the tax paying public, who pay for what we do Partner with the wider NHS and public sector to optimise healthcare and emergency services provision across London Our values & behaviours Respectful Professional Innovative Collaborative Caring for our patients Acting with honesty Thinking creatively Listening and and each other with and integrity learning from Driving value and compassion and each other Aspiring to clinical, sustainable change empathy technical and Working with partners Harnessing technology Championing equality managerial excellence and new ways of Being open and and diversity Leading by example working transparent Acting fairly Being accountable and Taking courageous Building trust outcomes orientated decisions Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 Section one – Performance Report Contents Performance Report Section one 1. Chair’s Foreword 2 2. Chief Executive’s Foreword 3 3. About Us 4 4. Our Patients 10 5. Our People 18 6. Our Partners 32 7. Our Public Value 36 8. Quality and Performance 38 9. Our Five-Year Strategy 46 Accountability Report Section two 10. Annual governance statement 49 11. Remuneration report 62 12. Staff report 69 Financial Report Section three 13. Financial Statements 71 14. Appendix – Glossary of Terms 121 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Performance Report – Section one Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 the rest of the health sector as well as our colleagues in the Metropolitan Police Service and London Fire Brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation to Contract: Detachment
    London Fire Commissioner Detachment to the London Ambulance Service – Driver Collaboration – Driver Assistance This document constitutes a variation to your substantive contract of employment with the London Fire Commissioner (‘LFC’). If you agree to this contract variation please email [ ] (insert contact details) advising that you accept this contract variation, and then sign a hard copy and return this to [ ] (insert contact details). London Ambulance Service Introduction You will be detached to the London Ambulance Service (LAS) to undertake duties as set out below. Your current terms of employment shall remain unchanged, save as set out in this variation to contract. When your LAS detachment comes to an end, you will return to your previous posting. Your sole employer will remain the LFC at all times. Duration of detachment Assistance to the LAS arises from the agreement (“national agreement”) made between the national employers, FBU and NFCC announced on 27 March 2020.Your detachment to the LAS will commence on [ ] (insert date), and shall continue until the earliest of: (a) 2 months after the commencement date, a date which may be extended subject to your wish to continue and on condition that if the national agreement is extended by the FBU by mutual agreement with the other parties. Any extension will be for a duration agreed in the national agreement; or (b) Before that date if 7 days after LFC gives written notice that the detachment will terminate; or (c) No later than 7 days after you give written notice that the detachment will terminate; or (d) immediately on the third calendar day of continuous sickness; or (e) immediately on the termination of your substantive employment with the LFC in accordance with the terms of your contract; The period between the first shift you work on detachment to the LAS and the applicable end date in paragraphs (a) to (e) above is the Detachment Period.
    [Show full text]