DOCSLIB.ORG

Mission: a Mark of the Church?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mission: a Mark of the Church? MISSION: A MARK OF THE CHURCH? TOWARD A MISSIONAL ECCLESIOLOGY By Robinson W. Mitchell An Integrative Thesis Submitted to the faculty Of Reformed Theological Seminary In fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Religion APPROVED: Thesis Advisor: ________________________________________ The Rev. Derek W. H. Thomas, Ph.D. RTS Virtual President: ___________________________________ Andrew J.Peterson, Ph.D. August 2008 ii ABSTRACT Mission: A Mark of the Church? Toward a Missional Ecclesiology Robinson W. Mitchell This thesis proceeds from a conviction that ecclesiology and mission, often considered as distinct concepts and disciplines, are in fact integral to each other. The study attempts to show that mission is inherent in the nature of the triune God, his relationship to creation, and the redemptive agency of the church. The need for this study is particularly urgent in view of cultural changes that have ended the influence, prestige and privilege the church enjoyed for more than a millennium of Christendom. The church must be more self- aware if it would seek to fulfill its kingdom potential in the increased pluralism of the West. The study comprises eight chapters: Chapter 1 introduces the study and makes a case for why the study is timely today. Chapter 2 examines the concept of the Mission of God and attempts to set forth a working definition and semantic taxonomy to inform the discussion that follows. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 look at the Mission of God from the perspectives of biblical studies, systematic theology, and church history, respectively. Scriptural focus is on the missional aspects of the blessing formulas in the OT and the commissioning texts of the NT 1. The theological study examines missional aspects of the Trinity and expresses a perichoretic- missional ecclesiology that proceeds directly from the union of the church with Christ in his 1 All Scripture references are from the New International Version unless otherwise noted. iii missional activity. The historical study reviews several salient periods of missions history where the missional nature of the church was manifested successfully. Chapter 6 considers the Nicene marks of the church as manifested in three major ecclesiologies and also considers contemporary developments. The arguments come together in Chapter 7, where the evidence is brought together to show that mission is indeed a mark of the church. Chapter 8 expresses the significance of missional ecclesiology for today, setting forth some practical concepts and cautions toward implementing a missional ecclesiology. iv DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my loving and longsuffering wife Miłka, for patience, kindness, and support that made this work possible To you, my love, for your forbearance through years of study, through long nights I spent at the computer instead of with you ~ And to my children Kasia, Kaelin, and Elijah, for letting Daddy work so many times when you would have preferred me to play with you. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 PART 1–WHY THIS STUDY ?................................................................................................. 1 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 2 PART 2–EXAMINING ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2–THE MEANING OF MISSION ...................................................................... 11 TERMINOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 11 THE NEED TO DEFINE MISSION ........................................................................................... 14 TOWARD A WORKING DEFINITION OF THE MISSION OF GOD .............................................. 16 THE SUBJECT OF THE MISSION OF GOD ............................................................................. 17 THE ACT OF MISSION ........................................................................................................ 17 THE DIRECT OBJECT , AGENT OR INSTRUMENT OF MISSION ................................................ 18 THE INDIRECT OBJECTS OR RECIPIENTS OF MISSION .......................................................... 18 THE MOTIVE AND GOAL OF THE MISSION OF GOD ............................................................. 19 THE MISSION OF GOD RESTATED ...................................................................................... 19 THE MEANING OF MISSIONAL ............................................................................................ 20 CHAPTER 3 - THE PEOPLE OF GOD AND MISSION IN THE BIBLE ........................... 24 FOCUS OF THE SCRIPTURAL STUDY ................................................................................... 24 NT TEXTS THAT INTEGRATE THE OT ................................................................................ 26 THE MISSIONAL COVENANT IN GENESIS ........................................................................... 27 NEW TESTAMENT CLAIMS ON THE OLD TESTAMENT COVENANT ...................................... 31 A WORD STUDY OF “SENDING ” IN JOHN ’S GOSPEL ............................................................ 33 A BRIEF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SEND AND SENT IN JOHN ’S GOSPEL ............................ 34 JOHN ’S USAGE OF SEND ..................................................................................................... 34 vi THEMATIC STUDY ............................................................................................................. 35 TRINITARIAN SENDING ..................................................................................................... 37 OBEDIENCE TO THE SENDER ............................................................................................. 38 COMMISSIONING FORMULAS IN MATTHEW AND LUKE -ACTS ............................................ 39 MISSIONAL IDENTITY ........................................................................................................ 42 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 42 CHAPTER 4–THEOLOGY-SHAPED MISSION ................................................................. 44 A MISSIONARY GOD ......................................................................................................... 44 THE DIVINE DANCE .......................................................................................................... 44 THE MISSION OF ONTOLOGICAL MEDIATORSHIP ................................................................ 46 PERICHORESIS AND MISSION ............................................................................................ 49 PERICHORETIC -MISSIONAL ECCLESIOLOGY ....................................................................... 52 THE MISSION OF REDEMPTIVE MEDIATORSHIP ................................................................... 52 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 55 CHAPTER 5–MISSION IN HISTORY ................................................................................. 57 THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH IN THE BOOK OF ACTS ........................................................ 57 THE MISSION TO THE ROMAN EMPIRE .............................................................................. 59 ULFILAS AND THE MISSION TO THE GOTHS ....................................................................... 65 PATRICK AND CELTIC CHRISTIANITY ................................................................................ 66 KYRIL AND METHODIUS AND THE SLAVIC MISSION ......................................................... 69 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 71 CHAPTER 6–THE MARKS OF THE CHURCH.................................................................. 73 WHAT IS THE CHURCH ?..................................................................................................... 73 BIBLICAL IMAGES OF THE CHURCH ................................................................................... 74 PRE -NICENE ECCLESIOLOGY ............................................................................................. 78 ONE HOLY , CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH ............................................................. 80 vii THE EASTERN CHURCH : EUCHARISTIC ECCLESIOLOGY ................................................... 82 THE CHURCH OF ROME : MAGISTERIAL ECCLESIOLOGY ................................................... 84 THE PROTESTANTS : CONFESSIONAL ECCLESIOLOGY ........................................................ 86 CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................................... 91 CHAPTER 7–MISSION: A MARK OF THE CHURCH?..................................................... 93 THE OBJECT OF THE EXERCISE ........................................................................................... 93 ASSEMBLING THE ARGUMENTS ......................................................................................... 94 WITNESSES FOR THE AFFIRMATIVE ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPETIZER – Loving God with Our Minds DINE in – Because Jesus
    THREE DANGERS… 1. You may widen your hypocrisy gap. Galatians 5:6; James 1:22-25 2. You may get bogged down in the paralysis of analysis. John 5:39-40 WEEK 1: PROLEGOMENA & GOSPELOLOGY: Loving God with all our Minds 3. You may fall in love with a system instead of your Saviour. WEEK 2: CHRISTOLOGY & BIBLIOLOGY – The Word of God, in Print and in Person WEEK 3: THEOLOGY PROPER/PATEROLOGY – The Person and Work of God John 3:8; 1 Corinthians 4:20 WEEK 4: ANTHROPOLOGY & HARMARTIOLOGY – Humanity and Sin WEEK 5: SOTERIOLOGY – Salvation Achieved and Received WEEK 6: ZOEOLOGY – The Christian Life (with Special Guest) THREE TIPS TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE… WEEK 7: PNEUMATOLOGY – The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit WEEK 8: ECCLESIOLOGY – The Identity and Practice of the Church 1. Look for the ONE THING that connects with you. WEEK 9: MISSIOLOGY – The Mission of the Church 2. Imagine how you will LIVE what you learn. WEEK 10: ESCHATOLOGY – Last Things 3. Do your homework – review, discuss, apply. APPETIZER – Loving God With Our Minds Mark 12:28-34; Romans 12:2 “THEOLOGY” = Theos (God) + Logos (Word) DINE IN – Because Jesus Is Lord THEOLOGY = Faith Seeking Understanding (Augustine & Anselm) Romans 10:9; 2 Corinthians 4:5 vs APOLOGETICS = Offering evidence for the faith we have Because Jesus is Lord (CHRISTOLOGY/GOSPELOLOGY)… THEOLOGY IS A LOT LIKE DOING A PUZZLE… • God is Love (THEOLOGY PROPER/PATEROLOGY) • SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY = the picture of the puzzle • The Bible is Precious (BIBLIOLOGY) • BIBLICAL THEOLOGY = the pieces of the puzzle • We Are Priceless
    [Show full text]
  • Theology Proper
    Scholars Crossing Bible Doctrines Center for Global Ministries 2009 Theology Proper Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_bib_doc Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Theology Proper" (2009). Bible Doctrines. 7. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_bib_doc/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bible Doctrines by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Systems of Perception Rationalism: Pilate When this is the sole guide in discovering about God, then the supernatural must be explained by human understanding. All that cannot be explained is rejected as untrue. Empiricism: Thomas Pursuing knowledge through observation and experiment. Must see, smell, teach, hear or taste it or not true! Faith: believers “By faith we understand” (Heb 11:3)= faith-perception A person reads the Bible, sees a fact of spiritual truth or phenomenon and accepts it by faith without further proof Theology Proper 7 Is faith rational? 1. And he said: "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 18:3 • Children accept things as true because of a trust in a person. • By faith all biblical facts are accepted because of a trust in His person and Word 2. Is not irrational, nor unreasonable, nor without evidence. Nature shows that God is (Ps 19:1-6; Ro 1:19-20) 3. John came to the tomb in unbelief, saw the evidence, remembered Jesus’ words and believed (Jn 20:30-31).
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Driscoll Removed from the Acts 29 Church Planting Network He Helped Found
    Mark Driscoll removed from the Acts 29 church planting network he helped found Sarah Pulliam Bailey August 8, 2014, Religion News Service (RNS) Seattle megachurch pastor Mark Driscoll has been removed from a church-planting network of more than 500 churches he helped found after a pattern of “ungodly and disqualifying behavior.” Driscoll, co-founder of the Acts 29 Network, has been an influential but edgy pastor within conservative evangelical circles for several years. His own Mars Hill Church attracts some 14,000 people at 15 locations across five states each Sunday. At the same time, however, Driscoll has been controversial in evangelical circles for years. The New York Times Magazine called him “one of the most admired — and reviled — figures among evangelicals nationwide.” He has been provocative, occasionally profane and has faced allegations of plagiarism and inflating his book sales. After Acts 29 board action, all of Driscoll’s Mars Hill Church locations have been removed from the website of the network. “It is our conviction that the nature of the accusations against Mark, most of which have been confirmed by him, make it untenable and unhelpful to keep Mark and Mars Hill in our network,” the Act 29 board wrote in a letter. “In taking this action, our prayer is that it will encourage the leadership of Mars Hill to respond in a distinctive and godly manner so that the name of Christ will not continue to be dishonored.” In a longer letter obtained by blogger Warren Throckmorton, the Acts 29 board asked Driscoll to “step down from ministry for an extended time and seek help.” “Over the past three years, our board and network have been the recipients of countless shots and dozens of fires directly linked to you and what we consider ungodly and disqualifying behavior,” the board wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEY of THEOLOGY PROPER What Is God Like? Grace Institute - Pastor Jim C
    SURVEY OF THEOLOGY PROPER What is God Like? Grace Institute - Pastor Jim C. Davis Lecture Twelve: Trinity – The History of the Doctrine 1A. The History of the Term Trinity and the heretical views 1B. Introduction – Theology Proper answers the question. What is God like? Heretical conflicts clarified our orthodox doctrines of Scripture. And there are two principles to determine orthodox doctrine. • God has revealed all we need to know through His inspired word. • The Holy Spirit will teach and guide the church into all truth. 1C. For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction, so that through perseverance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope. [Rom 15:4 NASB] 2C. "But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. [Jhn 16:13 NASB] 3C. As for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him. [1Jo 2:27 NASB] 2B. 2nd Century – Conflict with Gnosticism 1C. The earliest extant usage is from Theophilus, ca. A.D. 170. 2C. It is assumed that the word was used one to four decades earlier. 3C. 2nd Century response from the church – Apostle’s Creed 3B.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Nature of Theology Definition I) General
    1. The Nature of Theology Definition i) General Definition: The term theology comes from the combination of theos (Greek for god) and logos (Greek for word or dialogue). Theology is most broadly understood as a "discussion regarding God" (It is often said that theology may be defined as a "discussion of God" which intends the same meaning, though this is all too often misunderstood to mean "discussion by God") Thus any religion involving a god worthy of dialogue will require some form of theology. (Of course once you step out of western tradition, Greek terminology quickly loses its precision.) ii) Specific Definition: Christian Theology involves the entire study of God and His relation to man and the universe, while specifically incorporating all biblical doctrines. Difference between Theology and "Bible Doctrine" i) Bible Doctrine restricts itself to only what is taught in the Bible. ii) Theology goes to other sources of truth. Example: "Canonicity of the Bible" (Ie, The process through which the books of the Bible were decided upon) (a) Canonicity involves historical truths (as to how canonicity occurred) not recorded in the Bible. (b) One's stance on canonicity involves logical truths (as to what tests were used for canonicity) not recorded in the Bible. Example: Arguments for the Existence of God (a) Such arguments involve philosophical truths not expressed in the Bible. (b) Such arguments involve logical truths not expressed in the Bible. iii) Theology includes Bible Doctrine Theologians will at times study more than the Bible. (a) There is much truth not found in the Bible, such as in Science, History and Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Ecclesiology: Roger Haight’S Christian Community in History for Evangelical Resourcement Justin L
    Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies JBTSVOLUME 4 | ISSUE 2 Comparative Ecclesiology: Roger Haight’s Christian Community in History for Evangelical Resourcement Justin L. McLendon [JBTS 4.2 (2019): 317–333] Comparative Ecclesiology: Roger Haight’s Christian Community in History for Evangelical Resourcement JUSTIN L. MCLENDON Justin L. McLendon is Assistant Professor of Theology at Grand Canyon University and Grand Canyon Theological Seminary in Phoenix, Arizona. Introduction Due in part to its late arrival within systematic theological loci, ecclesiology remains fertile soil for wide-ranging investigative inquiries from academic scholars and thoughtful clergy.1 Paul Avis, doyen of academic ecclesiology, positions the discipline in the forefront of modern theological attention, even claiming, “during the past couple of centuries, ecclesiology became a major theological discipline; today, at the beginning of the twenty-first century of the Christian era, it is at the heart of theological research and debate.”2 Ecclesiology lies at the heart of modern theological dialogue because the identity, purpose, and power of the church are inextricably connected to all other biblical and theological emphases. One can hardly discuss any salient aspect of Christianity without acknowledging its connection to the church as God’s people, or explain in some sense how God uses this eschatological people as the conduit through which he presently engages human history.3 As research progresses to analyze global ecclesiological phenomena or specific issues within any longstanding church tradition, debates will persist as interlocutors grapple with multiform critiques and proposals.4 Broadly speaking, contemporary theological works fall within two approaches. One approach is decidedly categorical and/or descriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • Theo / Logy Theology Proper Biblio / Logy Angelology / Demonology
    Theo / logy God word, discourse, study of Theology Proper Biblio / logy Book word Angelology / Demonology → Pneumatology Hamartiology Anthropology Ecclesiology Christology Eschatology “God Is One” – Mono / theism one God poly / theism many gods Some OT references Deut. 6:4 – 'Shema' Isa. 44:6 – 8 45:5 – 6, 14, 18, 21, 22 Some NT references Mark 12:29 – 30 I Cor. 8:4 Eph. 4: 6 I Tim. 2:5 Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ John 5:16 – 27 “making Himself equal with God” (v. 18) The Son is equal with the Father – in whatever He does (19) – in giving life to whom He wills (21) – in exercising judgment (22) (27) – in receiving honor (23) – in aseity (26) John 10:22 – 33 “I and My Father are one.” (v. 30) Titus 2:13 John 1:1, 14, 18 Rom. 9:5 Phil. 2:5 – 6 Col. 1:15 – 17 Heb. 1:1 – 12 Deity of the Holy Spirit John 14:16 – “another Helper” II Cor. 13:14 – Holy Spirit is included on the same level as the Father and the Son Acts 5:1 – 4 – “to lie to the Holy Spirit” (3) “you have not lied to men, but to God.” (4) Romans 8:1 – 11 – “the Spirit of life” (2) “the Spirit of God” (9) “the Spirit of Christ” (9) TRINITARIANISM –Not modalism Matthew 3:13 – 17 John 1:29 – 34 –Not tritheism Deut. 6:4 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Baptismal formula of Matthew 28:19 'name' is singular – Blessing of II Cor. 13:14 – Prayer of Rev. 1:4 – 5 The Trinity Ontological – Same essence Same attributes Same substance Same makeup Economic – different functions God the Father plans, heads God the Son executes, carries out God the Holy Spirit applies “When we have said these three things, then – that there is but one God, that the Father and the Son and the Spirit is each God, that the Father and the Son and the Spirit is each a distinct person – we have enunciated the doctrine of the Trinity in its completeness.” B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Review – November 2018
    IBFNA November 2018 Volume 27, Number 2 THE REVIEW Gratitude or Greed? By Dr. Bob Payne, Moderator IBFNA I am writing this moderator’s column a few weeks before Thanksgiving. We have so much for which to be thankful in our country. God has indeed shed His grace on us. Material blessings abound. Even the poorest of us is rich in comparison with many others who live in other countries. Like no other country, we have every reason to be grateful for what we have. In Deut. 8:12-14, Moses shares with Israel some things that they were not to forget when they entered the prosperity of the promised land. They were to beware to keep the Lord’s commandments, “Lest when thou hast eaten and art full, and hast built INSIDE PAGES goodly houses, and dwelt therein; And when thy herds and thy flocks multiply, and thy silver and thy gold is multiplied, and all that thou hast is multiplied; Then thine heart be lifted up, and thou forget the LORD thy God, which brought thee forth out of 2- the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.” CY*J`J-`3- Greedy Christians N7+-CY*J`J_- - I wonder if believers in our nation today have not fallen into the same trap that Isra- - el did. We too have forgotten God. Instead of embracing an attitude of humble thanks- giving, we have become greedy and avaricious. 7- The author of Hebrews writes in 13:5: “Let your conversation [conduct] be without 20 9-- covetousness [without the love of money, without greed]; and be content with such C`A77`-7- things as ye have.” Paul wrote in 1 Tim.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to WEST's Statement on Their Website
    Response to the statement posted by WEST on its website entitled ‘Negative Publicity’ This article is written by R. E. Palgrave and includes links to important information by Dr E. S. Williams. The section on information sources is written by Mr E. Roberts. In January 2013 the Bible League Quarterly and the Sword and Trowel published an article by R. E. Palgrave regarding the abandonment of Biblical separation from error by Wales Evangelical School of Theology (WEST). In summary, this article outlined the following: WEST has appointed as its Chancellor a man who has had a 20-year close relationship with Rick Warren and who has signed his ecumenical P.E.A.C.E Plan promoting work with Muslims, Roman Catholics and all faiths. WEST has appointed as its Chairman a man who has translated Rick Warren’s teachings into Korean and is himself teaching Rick Warren’s message of easy believism. WEST has made alliances with Porterbrook and Acts 29 Network. The latter was founded by Mark Driscoll who promotes immoral and licentious behaviour and is part of the Emerging Church. WEST now offers Porterbrook courses which teach Emerging Church and New Calvinist philosophies. WEST and Acts 29 are working together on an initiative called ‘Valley Commandos.’ WEST has also appointed on its board the international director of the ecumenically compromised Lausanne Movement. The Bible League Quarterly article entitled The Right Direction? can be found here: http://www.bibleleaguetrust.org/articles/west.pdf The Sword and Trowel abridged article entitled Abandoning Separation from Biblical Error: The Disaster of the Theological College WEST (with an introduction by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Systematic Theology Work? Subscribe to Our Compelling Mail Newsletter: Email Address Submit
    2/10/2016 How does systematic theology work? Subscribe to our Compelling Mail Newsletter: Email Address Submit How does systematic theology work? Subscribe to our Compelling Mail Newsletter: Email Address Submit Systematic theology is the field of study that correlates the data of the Bible as a whole in order to organize the total of God's special revelation. In other words, systematic theology is a way of categorizing what the Bible teaches regarding key areas of the Christian faith. Traditionally, theologians concentrate on a list of specific categories within the field of systematic theology. Some of these categories include the following: • Prolegomena, a technical term meaning "the beginning of the discussion," is often found in theology books to discuss introductory issues and definitions. • Theology Proper (also called Paterology) is the study of what the Bible teaches about God the Father. • Christology is the study of God the Son. • Pneumatology is the study of God the Holy Spirit. • Bibliology is the study of the Bible (also called special revelation). • Soteriology is the study of salvation. • Ecclesiology is the study of the church. • Angelology is the study of angels (including fallen angels or demons and Satan, sometimes under the headings of Demonology and Satanology). • Anthropology is the study of humanity (different from the field of anthropology since Christian anthropology focuses on the spiritual aspects of humanity). • Harmartiology is the study of sin. • Eschatology is the study of "last things," including biblical prophecy, the end times, and the afterlife. In addition to systematic theology, there are many other ways in which theology can be studied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calvinists: a Reply to Gerald Harris by Mark Lamprecht, Hereiblog.Com
    The Calvinists: a Reply to Gerald Harris By Mark Lamprecht, HereIBlog.com Gerald Harris, editor of the The Christian Index, the Georgia Southern Baptist newspaper, recently published the article ―The Calvinists are here.‖1 There have been two immediate responses to Harris‘ piece including one by former Calvinist William Birch2 and an article in the Baptist Press in which some of the people mentioned by Harris answered his concerns.3 Harris‘ article seems to be pieced together without a thesis. The article seems strung together by insinuations built upon a connect-the-dots type of guilt by association. In short, there is a lot to untangle in Harris‘ article. In the following response, which has been broken into two parts, I will attempt to untangle some of Harris‘ insinuations and point out that his his dots do not actually connect to support insinuations that Calvinism is a problem. Sections of Harris‘ article will be quoted and interacted with so this article will be long, but necessary. Why is this response necessary? This response is necessary for the sake of encouraging Southern Baptists from differing theological perspectives to move beyond casting judgements based upon personal bias. The response is necessary to encourage continuing working together for the sake of the gospel while embracing one another in Christ without questioning each others motives every step of the way. Remember, love bears, believes, hopes, and endures all things (1 Cor. 13:7) and love covers a multitude of sins (1 Peter 4:8). I hold Mr. Harris as a brother in Christ who has served the body of Christ through the SBC for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Baptist Convention
    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2019 The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God's Power and Women's Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention Sydney Smith [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Sydney, "The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God's Power and Women's Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention" (2019). Honors Projects. 123. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/123 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God’s Power and Women’s Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention An Honors Paper for the Department of Religion By Sydney Catherine Smith Bowdoin College, 2019 © 2019 Sydney Smith Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………..………………….. 1 Chapter 1: A Brief History of The Conservative Takeover of the SBC……………………........ 15 Chapter 2: Neo-Calvinism: Continuity and Change …………………….………………………. 33 Chapter 3: Loyalty, Denominational Politics, and Departure from Baptist Tradition ...………... 54 Chapter 4: Strategic Submission and the Empowerment of Southern Baptist Women …………. 69 Chapter 5: A Day of Reckoning for the SBC? …………….……………………………………. 96 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….………….…. 127 Bibliography………………………………………………………….………………………... 132 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Bowdoin College Faculty Scholar program, for providing the grant which facilitated the summer research that made this project possible.
    [Show full text]