DOCSLIB.ORG

Estimating Selected Low-Flow Frequency Statistics and Harmonic-Mean Flows for Ungaged, Unregulated Streams in Indiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estimating Selected Low-Flow Frequency Statistics and Harmonic-Mean Flows for Ungaged, Unregulated Streams in Indiana Prepared in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management Estimating Selected Low-Flow Frequency Statistics and Harmonic-Mean Flows for Ungaged, Unregulated Streams in Indiana Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5102 Version 1.1, October 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Bridge over Little Otter Creek in Jefferson County, Indiana. The photograph is courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge. Estimating Selected Low-Flow Frequency Statistics and Harmonic-Mean Flows for Ungaged, Unregulated Streams in Indiana By Gary R. Martin, Kathleen K. Fowler, and Leslie D. Arihood Prepared in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5102 Version 1.1, October 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 First release: 2016 Revised: October 2016 (ver. 1.1) For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Martin, G.R., Fowler, K.K., and Arihood, L.D., 2016, Estimating selected low-flow frequency statistics and harmonic-mean flows for ungaged, unregulated streams in Indiana (ver 1.1, October 2016): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016 –5102, 45 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20165102. ISSN 2329-132X (online) iii Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................vii Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................2 Previous Studies ..................................................................................................................................2 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................2 Physiography and Geology .................................................................................................................4 Climate ....................................................................................................................................................5 Development of Datasets for Streamgages ..............................................................................................5 Source of Low-Flow Frequency and Harmonic-Mean Flow Statistics ........................................5 Sources of Basin Characteristics ....................................................................................................12 Development of Equations for Estimating Selected Low-Flow Frequency Statistics and Harmonic-Mean Flows at Ungaged, Unregulated Stream Sites ....................................17 Logistic-Regression Analysis............................................................................................................17 Multiple-Linear-Regression Analyses .............................................................................................18 Limitations and Accuracy of the Estimating Equations ................................................................21 Prediction Intervals ...................................................................................................................27 Example Applications of the Estimating Equations .......................................................................28 Example 1 ....................................................................................................................................28 Example 2 ....................................................................................................................................28 Example 3 ....................................................................................................................................29 Results and Discussion of Regression Analyses ...................................................................................30 Summary........................................................................................................................................................30 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................31 Glossary .........................................................................................................................................................34 Appendix 1. Classification Tables for Logistic-Regression Equations for Estimating the Probability of Zero Flow for Selected Low-Flow Frequencies in Indiana .............................35 Appendix 2. Values Needed to Determine 90-Percent Prediction Intervals for Multiple-Linear-Regression Estimates of Low-Flow Statistics in Indiana ............................38 Appendix 3. Values of Basin Characteristics That Were Significant Explanatory Variables in the Regression Equations .......................................................................................40 iv Figures 1. Map showing major rivers and river basins in Indiana ..........................................................3 2. Map showing physiographic regions of Indiana and streamgages used in regression analyses .................................................................................................................4 3. Map showing grid of texture-based average horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the first 70 feet below land surface of unconsolidated deposits in Indiana ................13 4. Map showing residuals of a 7-day 10-year recurrence interval streamflow regression equation for the entire study area ......................................................................20 5. Screenshot of the weighted-multiple-linear regression program smoothing function for generalized-least squares correlation of the time series of annual minimum 7-day mean flows as a function of distance between 78 streamgages with 30 years of concurrent flow in Indiana ...........................................................................21 6. Graphs showing comparison of selected low-flow frequencies estimated from measured streamflow and from regression equations for unregulated streams in Indiana, observed and predicted values for annual minimum 1-day mean, 10-year low flows; annual minimum 7-day mean, 10-year low flows; and annual minimum 30-day mean, 10-year low flows .............................................................................23 7. Graphs showing comparison of harmonic-mean flows estimated from measured streamflow and from regression equations for unregulated streams in three low-flow regions of Indiana ........................................................................25 Tables 1. Description of U.S. Geological Survey streamgages and low-flow frequency statistics, harmonic-mean flows, and probability of zero flows used in the development of regional regression equations for Indiana ..................................................6 2. Description of basin characteristics evaluated as potential explanatory variables in regression equations for estimating selected low-flow statistics in Indiana ..............14 3. Logistic-regression equations for estimating the annual probability of zero flow for selected low-flow frequencies for ungaged, unregulated streams statewide in Indiana ......................................................................................................................................18 4. Generalized-least-squares regression equations for estimating selected nonzero low-flow frequencies for ungaged, unregulated streams statewide in Indiana ..............20 5. Weighted-least-squares regression equations for estimating harmonic-mean flow for ungaged, unregulated streams in each low-flow region in Indiana ...................22 6. Basin-characteristic ranges for the logistic-regression equations for estimating the annual probability of zero flow for selected low-flow frequencies and generalized-least-squares regression equations for estimating selected nonzero low-flow frequencies for ungaged, unregulated streams statewide in Indiana ..............22 7. Basin-characteristic ranges for the weighted-least-squares regression equations for estimating harmonic-mean flows for ungaged, unregulated streams in each low-flow region in Indiana ........................................................................................................22
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Harmonic, Geometric and Arithmetic Means for Change Detection in SAR Time Series Guillaume Quin, Béatrice Pinel-Puysségur, Jean-Marie Nicolas
    Comparison of Harmonic, Geometric and Arithmetic means for change detection in SAR time series Guillaume Quin, Béatrice Pinel-Puysségur, Jean-Marie Nicolas To cite this version: Guillaume Quin, Béatrice Pinel-Puysségur, Jean-Marie Nicolas. Comparison of Harmonic, Geometric and Arithmetic means for change detection in SAR time series. EUSAR. 9th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, 2012., Apr 2012, Germany. hal-00737524 HAL Id: hal-00737524 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00737524 Submitted on 2 Oct 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. EUSAR 2012 Comparison of Harmonic, Geometric and Arithmetic Means for Change Detection in SAR Time Series Guillaume Quin CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France Béatrice Pinel-Puysségur CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France Jean-Marie Nicolas Telecom ParisTech, CNRS LTCI, 75634 Paris Cedex 13, France Abstract The amplitude distribution in a SAR image can present a heavy tail. Indeed, very high–valued outliers can be observed. In this paper, we propose the usage of the Harmonic, Geometric and Arithmetic temporal means for amplitude statistical studies along time. In general, the arithmetic mean is used to compute the mean amplitude of time series.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Mean Weighted Mean Or Harmonic Mean
    MultiplyMultiply oror Divide?Divide? AA BestBest PracticePractice forfor FactorFactor AnalysisAnalysis 77 ––10 10 JuneJune 20112011 Dr.Dr. ShuShu-Ping-Ping HuHu AlfredAlfred SmithSmith CCEACCEA Los Angeles Washington, D.C. Boston Chantilly Huntsville Dayton Santa Barbara Albuquerque Colorado Springs Ft. Meade Ft. Monmouth Goddard Space Flight Center Ogden Patuxent River Silver Spring Washington Navy Yard Cleveland Dahlgren Denver Johnson Space Center Montgomery New Orleans Oklahoma City Tampa Tacoma Vandenberg AFB Warner Robins ALC Presented at the 2011 ISPA/SCEA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com PRT-70, 01 Apr 2011 ObjectivesObjectives It is common to estimate hours as a simple factor of a technical parameter such as weight, aperture, power or source lines of code (SLOC), i.e., hours = a*TechParameter z “Software development hours = a * SLOC” is used as an example z Concept is applicable to any factor cost estimating relationship (CER) Our objective is to address how to best estimate “a” z Multiply SLOC by Hour/SLOC or Divide SLOC by SLOC/Hour? z Simple, weighted, or harmonic mean? z Role of regression analysis z Base uncertainty on the prediction interval rather than just the range Our goal is to provide analysts a better understanding of choices available and how to select the right approach Presented at the 2011 ISPA/SCEA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com PR-70, 01 Apr 2011 Approved for Public Release 2 of 25 OutlineOutline Definitions
    [Show full text]
  • “Mean”? a Review of Interpreting and Calculating Different Types of Means and Standard Deviations
    pharmaceutics Review What Does It “Mean”? A Review of Interpreting and Calculating Different Types of Means and Standard Deviations Marilyn N. Martinez 1,* and Mary J. Bartholomew 2 1 Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine, US FDA, Rockville, MD 20855, USA 2 Office of Surveillance and Compliance, Center for Veterinary Medicine, US FDA, Rockville, MD 20855, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-240-3-402-0635 Academic Editors: Arlene McDowell and Neal Davies Received: 17 January 2017; Accepted: 5 April 2017; Published: 13 April 2017 Abstract: Typically, investigations are conducted with the goal of generating inferences about a population (humans or animal). Since it is not feasible to evaluate the entire population, the study is conducted using a randomly selected subset of that population. With the goal of using the results generated from that sample to provide inferences about the true population, it is important to consider the properties of the population distribution and how well they are represented by the sample (the subset of values). Consistent with that study objective, it is necessary to identify and use the most appropriate set of summary statistics to describe the study results. Inherent in that choice is the need to identify the specific question being asked and the assumptions associated with the data analysis. The estimate of a “mean” value is an example of a summary statistic that is sometimes reported without adequate consideration as to its implications or the underlying assumptions associated with the data being evaluated. When ignoring these critical considerations, the method of calculating the variance may be inconsistent with the type of mean being reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Means ‰ Mean of a Ratio ‰ Summarizing Variability: Range, Variance, Percentiles, Quartiles ‰ Determining Distribution of Data: Quantile-Quantile Plots
    SummarizingSummarizing MeasuredMeasured DataData ©2010 Raj Jain www.rajjain.com 12-1 OverviewOverview Basic Probability and Statistics Concepts: CDF, PDF, PMF, Mean, Variance, CoV, Normal Distribution Summarizing Data by a Single Number: Mean, Median, and Mode, Arithmetic, Geometric, Harmonic Means Mean of A Ratio Summarizing Variability: Range, Variance, percentiles, Quartiles Determining Distribution of Data: Quantile-Quantile plots ©2010 Raj Jain www.rajjain.com 12-2 PartPart III:III: ProbabilityProbability TheoryTheory andand StatisticsStatistics 1. How to report the performance as a single number? Is specifying the mean the correct way? 2. How to report the variability of measured quantities? What are the alternatives to variance and when are they appropriate? 3. How to interpret the variability? How much confidence can you put on data with a large variability? 4. How many measurements are required to get a desired level of statistical confidence? 5. How to summarize the results of several different workloads on a single computer system? 6. How to compare two or more computer systems using several different workloads? Is comparing the mean sufficient? 7. What model best describes the relationship between two variables? Also, how good is the model? ©2010 Raj Jain www.rajjain.com 12-3 BasicBasic ProbabilityProbability andand StatisticsStatistics ConceptsConcepts Independent Events: Two events are called independent if the occurrence of one event does not in any way affect the probability of the other event. Random Variable:
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Calculating Computer Performance
    Notes on Calculating Computer Performance Bruce Jacob and Trevor Mudge Advanced Computer Architecture Lab EECS Department, University of Michigan {blj,tnm}@umich.edu Abstract This report explains what it means to characterize the performance of a computer, and which methods are appro- priate and inappropriate for the task. The most widely used metric is the performance on the SPEC benchmark suite of programs; currently, the results of running the SPEC benchmark suite are compiled into a single number using the geometric mean. The primary reason for using the geometric mean is that it preserves values across normalization, but unfortunately, it does not preserve total run time, which is probably the figure of greatest interest when performances are being compared. Cycles per Instruction (CPI) is another widely used metric, but this method is invalid, even if comparing machines with identical clock speeds. Comparing CPI values to judge performance falls prey to the same prob- lems as averaging normalized values. In general, normalized values must not be averaged and instead of the geometric mean, either the harmonic or the arithmetic mean is the appropriate method for averaging a set running times. The arithmetic mean should be used to average times, and the harmonic mean should be used to average rates (1/time). A number of published SPECmarks are recomputed using these means to demonstrate the effect of choosing a favorable algorithm. 1.0 Performance and the Use of Means We want to summarize the performance of a computer; the easiest way uses a single number that can be compared against the numbers of other machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Cumstats'
    Package ‘cumstats’ January 16, 2017 Type Package Title Cumulative Descriptive Statistics Version 1.0 Date 2017-01-13 Author Arturo Erdely and Ian Castillo Maintainer Arturo Erdely <[email protected]> Description Cumulative descriptive statistics for (arithmetic, geometric, harmonic) mean, me- dian, mode, variance, skewness and kurtosis. License GPL-3 NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2017-01-16 08:13:00 R topics documented: cumstats-package . .2 cumgmean . .3 cumhmean . .4 cumkurt . .5 cummean . .6 cummedian . .7 cummode . .8 cumquant . .9 cumskew . 10 cumvar . 11 kurtosis . 11 Mode ............................................ 12 skewness . 13 Index 15 1 2 cumstats-package cumstats-package Cumulative Descriptive Statistics Description Cumulative descriptive statistics for (arithmetic, geometric, harmonic) mean, median, mode, vari- ance, skewness and kurtosis. Details The DESCRIPTION file: Package: cumstats Type: Package Title: Cumulative Descriptive Statistics Version: 1.0 Date: 2017-01-13 Author: Arturo Erdely and Ian Castillo Maintainer: Arturo Erdely <[email protected]> Description: Cumulative descriptive statistics for (arithmetic, geometric, harmonic) mean, median, mode, variance, skewness and kurtosis. License: GPL-3 Index of help topics: Mode Statistical Mode cumgmean Cumulative Geometric Mean cumhmean Cumulative Harmonic Mean cumkurt Cumulative Kurtosis cummean Cumulative Arithmetic Mean cummedian Cumulative Median cummode Cumulative Mode cumquant Cumulative Quantile cumskew Cumulative Skewness cumstats-package Cumulative Descriptive Statistics cumvar Cumulative Variance kurtosis Pearson's Measure of Kurtosis skewness Skewness Cumulative descriptive statistics for (arithmetic, geometric, harmonic) mean, median, mode, vari- ance, skewness and kurtosis. Author(s) Arturo Erdely and Ian Castillo Maintainer: Arturo Erdely <[email protected]> cumgmean 3 cumgmean Cumulative Geometric Mean Description Returns a vector whose elements are the cumulative geometric mean of the elements of the argu- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • [Math.PR] 3 Dec 2001 Nsm Eali Eto .;Hr Ewl Utrcl H Essentials
    HARMONIC MEAN, RANDOM POLYNOMIALS AND STOCHASTIC MATRICES NATALIA L. KOMAROVA AND IGOR RIVIN Abstract. Motivated by a problem in learning theory, we are led to study the dominant eigenvalue of a class of random matrices. This turns out to be related to the roots of the derivative of random polynomials (generated by picking their roots uniformly at random in the interval [0, 1], although our results extend to other distribu- tions). This, in turn, requires the study of the statistical behavior of the harmonic mean of random variables as above, and that, in turn, leads us to delicate question of the rate of convergence to stable laws and tail estimates for stable laws. Introduction The original motivation for the work in this paper was provided by the first-named author’s research in learning theory, specifically in various models of language acquisition (see [KNN2001, NKN2001, KN2001]) and more specifically yet by the analysis of the speed of con- vergence of the memoryless learner algorithm. The setup is described in some detail in Section 4.1; here we will just recall the essentials. There is a collection of concepts R1,...,Rn and words which refer to these concepts, sometimes ambiguously. The teacher generates a stream of words, referring to the concept R1. This is not known to the student, but he must learn by, at each steps, guessing some concept Ri and checking for consistency with the teacher’s input. The mem- oryless learner algorithm consists of picking a concept Ri at random, arXiv:math/0105236v2 [math.PR] 3 Dec 2001 and sticking by this choice, until it is proven wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximation of the Expected Value of the Harmonic Mean and Some Applications
    Approximation of the expected value of the harmonic mean and some applications Calyampudi Radhakrishna Raoa,b,1, Xiaoping Shic, and Yuehua Wuc aDepartment of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14221-3000; bCRRAO Advanced Institute of Mathematics, Statistics And Computer Science, Hyderabad-500046, India; and cDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3 Contributed by Calyampudi R. Rao, July 1, 2014 (sent for review June 5, 2014) Although the harmonic mean (HM) is mentioned in textbooks asymptotic expansion of EðHnÞ or the general version EðHnðwÞÞ along with the arithmetic mean (AM) and the geometric mean (GM) under more general assumptions on distributions of Zi s. We as three possible ways of summarizing the information in a set of show that under mild assumptions, observations, its appropriateness in some statistical applications is ( ) notmentionedintextbooks.Duringthelast10yanumberof 1 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffic1 papers were published giving some statistical applications where EðHnÞ ∼ 1 + ; [5] logðnÞ HM is appropriate and provides a better performance than AM. In logðnÞ the present paper some additional applications of HM are consid- ered. The key result is to find a good approximation to E(Hn), the where the constant c1 will be given. In addition, we use the 5 expectation of the harmonic mean of n observations from a proba- approach for obtaining [ ] to the case that the first moment of = bility distribution. In this paper a second-order approximation to 1 Zi is finite, motivated by evaluation of the marginal likelihood E(Hn) is derived and applied to a number of problems.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT-II : Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion: Meaning and Objectives of Measures of Central Tendency, Different Measure Viz
    1 BUSINESS STATISTICS BBA UNIT –II, 2ND SEM UNIT-II : Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion: Meaning and objectives of measures of central tendency, different measure viz. arithmetic mean, median, mode, geometric mean and harmonic mean, characteristics, applications and limitations of these measures; measure of variation viz. range, quartile deviation mean deviation and standard deviation, co-efficient of variation and skewness. Measures of Central Tendency: A measure of central tendency is a single value that attempts to describe a set of data by identifying the central position within that set of data. As such, measures of central tendency are sometimes called measures of central location. They are also classed as summary statistic: 1. Mean 2. Median 3. Mode The mean, median and mode are all valid measures of central tendency, but under different conditions, some measures of central tendency become more appropriate to use than others. In the following sections, we will look at the mean, mode and median, and learn how to calculate them and under what conditions they are most appropriate to be used. 1. Mean: There are 3 types of mean 1A. Arithmetic Mean The mean (or average) is the most popular and well known measure of central tendency. It can be used with both discrete and continuous data, although its use is most often with continuous data. The mean is equal to the sum of all the values in the data set divided by the number of values in the data set. So, if we have n values in a data set and they have values x1, x2, ..., xn, the sample mean, usually denoted by (pronounced x bar), is: This formula is usually written in a slightly different manner using the Greek capitol letter, , pronounced "sigma", which means "sum of...": Example: The marks of seven students in a mathematics test with a maximum possible mark of 20 are given below: 15 13 18 16 14 17 12 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exposition on Means Mabrouck K
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2004 Which mean do you mean?: an exposition on means Mabrouck K. Faradj Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Applied Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Faradj, Mabrouck K., "Which mean do you mean?: an exposition on means" (2004). LSU Master's Theses. 1852. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1852 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHICH MEAN DO YOU MEAN? AN EXPOSITION ON MEANS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Mathematics by Mabrouck K. Faradj B.S., L.S.U., 1986 M.P.A., L.S.U., 1997 August, 2004 Acknowledgments This work was motivated by an unpublished paper written by Dr. Madden in 2000. This thesis would not be possible without contributions from many people. To every one who contributed to this project, my deepest gratitude. It is a pleasure to give special thanks to Professor James J. Madden for helping me complete this work. This thesis is dedicated to my wife Marianna for sacrificing so much of her self so that I may realize my dreams.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Harmonicmeanp'
    Package ‘harmonicmeanp’ August 19, 2019 Type Package Title Harmonic Mean p-Values and Model Averaging by Mean Maximum Likelihood Version 3.0 Date 2019-08-17 Author Daniel J. Wilson Maintainer Daniel Wilson <[email protected]> Description The harmonic mean p-value (HMP) test combines p-values and corrects for multiple test- ing while controlling the strong-sense family-wise error rate. It is more powerful than com- mon alternatives including Bonferroni and Simes procedures when combining large propor- tions of all the p-values, at the cost of slightly lower power when combining small propor- tions of all the p-values. It is more stringent than controlling the false discovery rate, and pos- sesses theoretical robustness to positive correlations between tests and un- equal weights. It is a multi-level test in the sense that a superset of one or more signifi- cant tests is certain to be significant and conversely when the superset is non-significant, the con- stituent tests are certain to be non-significant. It is based on MAMML (model averag- ing by mean maximum likelihood), a frequentist analogue to Bayesian model averag- ing, and is theoretically grounded in generalized central limit theorem. For detailed exam- ples type vignette(``harmonicmeanp'') after installation. Version 3.0 addresses errors in ver- sions 1.0 and 2.0 that led function p.hmp to control the familywise er- ror rate only in the weak sense, rather than the strong sense as intended. License GPL-3 Depends FMStable Suggests knitr, ape, rmarkdown VignetteBuilder knitr NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2019-08-19 18:00:05 UTC R topics documented: Asymptotically Exact Harmonic Mean p-Value .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Standards Quarterly Meeting April 7, 2015
    WATER QUALITY STANDARDS QUARTERLY MEETING JUNE 13, 2017 LAURA COOPER ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DWWM, WATER QUALITY STANDARDS [email protected] AGENDA • Introductions – WQS Staff & Attendees • Legislative Session in Review • Harmonic Mean Discussion • Other Water Quality Standards Topics WATER QUALITY STANDARDS UPDATE Since last meeting in November 2016 • DEP developed and shared “WV DEP Selenium Chronic Aquatic Life Criteria Implementation” • Still no approval or disapproval from EPA on • WV DEP Special Reclamation variances for Muddy Creek and Sandy Creek • Aluminum aquatic life criterion AGENDA • Introductions – WQS Staff & Attendees • Legislative Session in Review • Harmonic Mean Discussion • Other Water Quality Standards Topics WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 2017 WV LEGISLATURE • DEP withdrew its proposed WQS rule revisions on December 1st • Bills were introduced affecting WQS in Legislative session • HB 2506, amended §22-11-7b, passed March 28, signed by Governor on April 8 • SB 687, amended §22-11-7b, passed April 8, signed by Governor April 26 WHAT HOUSE BILL 2506 SAID HB 2506, Committee Substitute , from subsection (c) 2506 did not make any changes to Subsection (f) WHAT SENATE BILL 687 SAID SB 687, originated in Committee, subsection (f) Likewise, 687 did not make any changes to Subsection (c) WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE PLAN FOR 2017 • DEP is not proposing to revise the Water Quality Standards rule in 2017 • WQS program will continue to have quarterly public meetings to discuss standards, and hear any information about desired revisions • Will continue to review potential revisions and prepare for Triennial Review AGENDA • Introductions – WQS Staff & Attendees • Legislative Session in Review • Harmonic Mean Discussion • Other Water Quality Standards Topics WHAT IS HARMONIC MEAN FLOW? Harmonic mean flow—The flow that is determined by taking the reciprocal of the arithmetic mean of reciprocals of daily flow values.
    [Show full text]