DOCSLIB.ORG

Distributed Reverse DNS Geolocation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distributed Reverse DNS Geolocation Distributed Reverse DNS Geolocation Ovidiu Dan∗ Vaibhav Parikh Brian D. Davison Lehigh University Microsoft Bing Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA, 18015 Redmond, WA, USA, 98052 Bethlehem, PA, USA, 18015 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—IP geolocation databases map IP addresses to their often contain abbreviations or ambiguous names. If a hostname geographical locations. These databases are used in a variety of contains the substring mant, does that refer to Manteo, North online services to serve local content to users. Here we present Carolina, or to Mantorville, Minnesota? Or if it contains the methods for extracting locations from the reverse DNS hostnames assigned to IP addresses. We summarize a machine learning term snbr, does that mean the location is San Bruno, CA, based approach which, given a hostname, aims to extract and or San Bernardino, CA, or San Bartolomeo, Italy, or any of rank potential location candidates, which can then potentially be the other tens of locations around the world that could match fused with other geolocation signals. We show that this approach this abbreviation? These types of ambiguous names are often significantly outperforms a state-of-the-art academic baseline, difficult for humans as well. Second, reverse DNS hostnames and it is competitive and complementary to commercial baselines. Since extracting locations from more than a billion reverse DNS sometimes contain strings that are not directly derived from hostnames at once poses a significant computational challenge, the names of locations. For example, Verizon uses nycmny we develop a distributed version of our algorithm. We perform to refer to locations in New York, and GTE uses miasfl experiments on a cluster of 2,000 machines to demonstrate to refer to Miami, Florida. Third, extracting locations from that our distributed implementation can scale. We show that reverse DNS hostnames requires a scalable solution. There compared to the single machine version, our distributed approach can achieve a speedup of more than 150X. are more than 1.24 billion valid reverse DNS hostnames for Index Terms—IP geolocation; distributed algorithms; MapRe- IPv4 addresses alone. For each of these hostnames we have duce; geographic targeting; geotargeting; geographic personal- to evaluate and disambiguate potentially tens of candidate ization; reverse DNS; hostname geolocation locations. Our proposed solution generates on average 48 potential location candidates for each hostname, which yields I. INTRODUCTION close to 60 billion classifier decisions in total. IP geolocation databases are used by online services to determine the geographical location of users based solely on their IP address. They map IP ranges, typically of 256 IP Exact City Admin 1 Japan Top- Name Match Region Match Level Domain addresses in size, to locations at the city-level granularity. Companies such as MaxMind, Neustar IP Intelligence , and ip3801yokohama.kanagawa.ocn.ne.jp IP2Location provide commercial geolocation databases that are considered state of the art. They combine multiple data Fig. 1: Example information extracted from reverse DNS sources such as IP WHOIS information, network delay mea- surements triangulation through ping and traceroute, network topology analysis from BGP routing table dumps, reverse DNS To solve these problems, here we propose a distributed al- hostnames, and others [1]. However, the exact methods they gorithm for extracting locations from reverse DNS hostnames. use to compile these databases are proprietary. Prior research More specifically, our contributions are: has shown that these databases can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete [2]. Therefore, it is vital for these types of services 1) We present a distributed approach to reverse DNS to use complete and accurate geolocation databases. geolocation. We build on our ongoing single-node reverse In this work we use reverse DNS hostnames assigned to DNS geolocation work [3] and present a scalable distributed IP addresses as a source of geolocation information. Figure version. Our approach efficiently distributes computation 1 shows the type of location information that can be derived steps among a cluster of machines. from a hostname. In this example we can determine that the 2) We evaluate both versions of the algorithm using IP address behind this reverse DNS hostname may be located the largest ground truth set reported in geolocation in Yokohama, a city in Japan. Our task is to determine the lo- literature. First, we show that our method significantly cation of IP addresses based on their reverse DNS hostnames, outperforms a state of the art academic baseline, and it at city-level granularity. This task poses several challenges. is complementary and competitive with two commercial First, naming schemes used by ISPs are heterogeneous and database baselines. Second, we perform large-scale experi- ments on a cluster of 2,000 machines to test the distributed ∗Author is also affiliated with Microsoft Bing. version of our algorithm. II. RELATED WORK in March 2018 by randomly sampling the query logs of a The majority of IP geolocation research relies on active large-scale commercial search engine. network delay measurements to locate addresses. These In addition to the ground truth set, we use multiple publicly approaches issue pings or traceroutes from multiple geo- available datasets for feature generation, some of which we graphically distributed landmark servers to a target IP, then summarize here. GeoNames is a free database with geograph- triangulate the location [4], [5], [6], [7]. Network delay and ical information [11]. The CLLI dataset contains codes used topology methods have significant limitations. First, they have by the North American telecommunications industry to desig- scalability issues as they require access to landmark servers nate names of locations and functions of telecommunications distributed around the world and each target IP needs sepa- equipment. UN/LOCODE is a worldwide geographic coding rate measurements. Second, not all networks allow ping and scheme developed and maintained by the UN. It assigns codes traceroute. Third, routes on the Internet do not necessarily to locations used in trade and transport, such as rail yards, sea map to geographic distances. These problems often lead to ports, and airports. Rapid7 Reverse DNS consists of reverse lackluster results, with error distance in the order of hundreds DNS hostnames across the entire IPv4 address space. of kilometers. Some of the earlier research is also plagued B. Single node classification by extremely small ground truth datasets, often focusing on a handful of IP addresses in a few US universities [4], [5]. We begin by splitting hostnames into their constituent terms. Our work addresses several of these limitations. First, using Next, we iterate over each extracted term to find potential reverse DNS hostnames for geolocation does not require any location candidates, and we also compute the primary and sec- network delay measurements. Second, our ground truth dataset ondary features discussed below. We define the list of location is several orders of magnitude larger than the ones used candidates as the union of all locations which match any of the in previous work and it spans the entire planet. Third, our primary features. For example, since the term hrbg matches approach can be performed offline. the location Harrisburg, PA using our Abbreviations feature, In this work we propose extracting IP locations from we select this city among the initial location candidates. their reverse DNS hostnames. Undns is the most well- For each given hostname, we generate primary feature known and widely used reverse DNS geolocation approach categories, which are based on city names, abbreviations, [8]. It consists of manual rules which are expressed as regular concatenations of city names and administrative regions, CLLI expressions at the domain level. The disadvantage of this codes, UN/LOCODE codes, etc. Secondary feature categories approach is that each domain requires manually generated and are then generated in the context of a hostname and location potentially error prone rules. Our approach is more scalable candidate pair and their aim is to support the current candidate. since it does not require human input. It also handles unique For example, if a hostname contains the term allentown, situations better, since it considers the terms of each hostname the candidates found in the first phase include Allentown, PA individually, without requiring domain-specific training. and Allentown, WA. Secondary features are then computed to DRoP, another state of the art reverse DNS based approach, help in disambiguating locations. If the hostname also contains aims to geolocate hostnames using automatically generated the term wa then during the evaluation of the Allentown, rules generated by finding patterns across all the hostname WA candidate, the secondary feature Admin1 matches, which terms of a domain [9]. For example, it may find that for increases the confidence of this candidate. For a detailed list the domain cogentco.com, the second term from the right of features, please consult our paper draft which describes often contains airport codes. These rules are then validated the single-node approach in detail [3]. using network delay information. DRoP places 99% of IPs in We train a binary classifier where the input is a set of 5 test domains within 40 km of their actual location. However, features describing a hostname and location candidate pair, it uses network delay measurements and its method of splitting and the output indicates whether the hostname is likely to hostnames is rudimentary. be located in the candidate location. For this paper we have Finally DDec [10] combines undns and DRoP rules by chosen to train the classifier using C4.5 decision trees. While giving precedence to undns and using DRoP as fallback. this classifier might not yield the best overall results, it is extremely efficient, which is suitable for our goal of parsing III. APPROACH all 1.24 billion reverse DNS hostnames in the Rapid7 dataset. We present two versions of our approach.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Whois Based Geolocation and Google Maps API for Support Cybercrime Investigations
    Recent Advances in Telecommunications and Circuits Using Whois Based Geolocation and Google Maps API for support cybercrime investigations Asmir Butkovic*, Fahrudin Orucevic**, Anel Tanovic*** * Sector for Informatics, Police Support Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Aleja Bosne Srebrene bb, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina ** Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Electrical Engineering Zmaja od Bosne bb, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina *** Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo School of Science and Technology Zmaja od Bosne bb, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: - A major challenge facing all law-enforcement and intelligence-gathering organizations is accurately and efficiently analyzing the growing volumes of crime data. Cybercrime refers to any crime that involves a computer and network, where computer may or may not play an instrumental part in the commission of the crime. Detection and investigation of cybercrime can likewise be difficult because busy network traffic and frequent online transactions generate large amounts of data, only a small portion of which relates to illegal activities. In this paper, we are focusing on technologies that can help to improve the effective investigation of cybercrime, facilitate police work and enable investigators to allocate their time to other tasks. We have developed an IP mapping tool called MIPA that combines online mapping techniques and IP geolocation technology, and uses application functionality from disparate web sources. The emergence of the Web 2.0 and user-friendly online mapping techniques have created public interest in contributing information through Web- enabled geospatial tools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Shared Public Ips at Hotspots
    How Others Compromise Your Location Privacy: The Case of Shared Public IPs at Hotspots Nevena Vratonjic1,K´evin Huguenin1, Vincent Bindschaedler2,and Jean-Pierre Hubaux1 1 School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Switzerland 2 Department of Computer Science, UIUC, USA Abstract. Location privacy has been extensively studied over the last few years, especially in the context of location-based services where users purposely disclose their location to benefit from convenient context- aware services. To date, however, little attention has been devoted to the case of users’ location being unintentionally compromised by others. In this paper, we study a concrete and widespread example of such sit- uations, specifically the location-privacy threat created by access points (e.g., public hotspots) using network address translation (NAT). Indeed, because users connected to the same hotspot share a unique public IP, a single user making a location-based request is enough to enable a service provider to map the IP of the hotspot to its geographic coordinates, thus compromising the location privacy of all the other connected users. When successful, the service provider can locate users within a few hundreds of meters, thus improving over existing IP-location databases. Even in the case where IPs change periodically (e.g., by using DHCP), the service provider is still able to update a previous (IP, Location) mapping by inferring IP changes from authenticated communications (e.g., cookies). The contribution of this paper is three-fold: (i) We identify a novel threat to users’ location privacy caused by the use of shared public IPs. (ii) We formalize and analyze theoretically the threat.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Geolocation Through Reverse DNS
    IP Geolocation through Reverse DNS Ovidiu Dan∗ Vaibhav Parikh Brian D. Davison Lehigh University Microsoft Bing Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA Redmond, WA, USA Bethlehem, PA, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Table 1: Example of entries from an IP Geolocation database IP Geolocation databases are widely used in online services to map end user IP addresses to their geographical locations. However, they StartIP EndIP Country Region City use proprietary geolocation methods and in some cases they have 1.0.16.0 1.0.16.255 JP Tokyo Tokyo 124.228.150.0 124.228.150.255 CN Hunan Hengyang poor accuracy. We propose a systematic approach to use publicly 131.107.147.0 131.107.147.255 US Washington Redmond accessible reverse DNS hostnames for geolocating IP addresses. Our method is designed to be combined with other geolocation data sources. We cast the task as a machine learning problem where increased user satisfaction and conversely that missing location for a given hostname, we generate and rank a list of potential information leads to user dissatisfaction [2, 7, 25]. IP geolocation location candidates. We evaluate our approach against three state databases are also used in many other applications, including: con- of the art academic baselines and two state of the art commercial tent personalization and online advertising to serve content IP geolocation databases. We show that our work significantly local to the user [2, 18, 26], content delivery networks to direct outperforms the academic baselines, and is complementary and users to the closest datacenter [19], law enforcement to fight cy- competitive with commercial databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards IP Geolocation with Intermediate Routers Based on Topology Discovery Zhihao Wang1,2,Hongli1,2*,Qiangli3,Weili4, Hongsong Zhu1,2 and Limin Sun1,2
    Wang et al. Cybersecurity (2019) 2:13 Cybersecurity https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0030-2 RESEARCH Open Access Towards IP geolocation with intermediate routers based on topology discovery Zhihao Wang1,2,HongLi1,2*,QiangLi3,WeiLi4, Hongsong Zhu1,2 and Limin Sun1,2 Abstract IP geolocation determines geographical location by the IP address of Internet hosts. IP geolocation is widely used by target advertising, online fraud detection, cyber-attacks attribution and so on. It has gained much more attentions in these years since more and more physical devices are connected to cyberspace. Most geolocation methods cannot resolve the geolocation accuracy for those devices with few landmarks around. In this paper, we propose a novel geolocation approach that is based on common routers as secondary landmarks (Common Routers-based Geolocation, CRG). We search plenty of common routers by topology discovery among web server landmarks. We use statistical learning to study localized (delay, hop)-distance correlation and locate these common routers. We locate the accurate positions of common routers and convert them as secondary landmarks to help improve the feasibility of our geolocation system in areas that landmarks are sparsely distributed. We manage to improve the geolocation accuracy and decrease the maximum geolocation error compared to one of the state-of-the-art geolocation methods. At the end of this paper, we discuss the reason of the efficiency of our method and our future research. Keywords: IP geolocation, Network topology discovery, Web landmarks, Relative latency, Statistical learning Introduction In general, IP geolocation methods locate a host with IP geolocation aims to determine the geographical loca- following procedures: tion of an Internet host by its IP address (Muir and Oorschot 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Sumarul Revistelor Străine Abonate În Anul 2008
    SUMARUL REVISTELOR STRĂINE ABONATE ÎN ANUL 2008 VOL. 105, NO. 4 JULY-AUGUST 2008 325 Advanced Assessment of Cracking due to Heat of Hydration and Internal Restrains – S.-J. Jeon 334 Properties of Concrete after High-Temperature Heating and Cooling – J. Lee, Y. Xi, and K. Willam 342 Methodology to Couple Time-Temperature Effects on Rheology of Mortar – J.-Y. Petit, K. H. Khayat and E. Wirquin 350 Measurement of Reinforcement Corrosion Rate Using Transient Galvanostatic Pulse Method – H.-s. So and S. G. Millard 358 Large-Scale Processing of Engineered Cementitious Composites – M. D. Lepech and V. C. Li 367 Recycling Waste Latex Paint in Concrete with Added Value – A. Mohammed, M. Nehdi, and A. Adawi 375 Validation of Probability-Based Chloride-Induced Corrosion Service-Life Model – G. S. Williamson, R. E. Weyers, M. C. Brown, A. Ramniceanu, and M. M. Sprinkel 381 Prediction of Early-Age Cracking of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete due to Restrained Shrinkage – S. H. Kwon and S. P. Shah 2 390 Simplified Concrete Resistivity and Rapid Chloride Permeability Test Method – K. A. Riding, J. L. Poole, A. K. Schindler, M. C. G. Juenger, and K. J. Folliard 395 Change in Impact-Echo Response during Fatigue Loading of Concrete Bridge T-Girder – S. L. Gassman and A. S. Zein 404 Mechanisms of Radon Exhalation from Hardening Cementitious Materials – K. Kovler 414 Reducing Thermal and Autogenous Shrinkage Contributions to Early-Age Cracking – D. P. Bentz and M. A. Peltz Volume 105, no. 5, July-August 2008 429 Assessment of Damage Gradients Using Dynamic Modulus of Thin Concrete Disks - Ufuk Dilek 438 Impact of Extremely Hot Weather and Mixing Method on Changes in Properties of Ready Mixed Concrete during Delivery - Abdulaziz I.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographically Restricted Streaming Content and Evasion of Geolocation
    Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review Volume 19 | Issue 2 2013 Geographically Restricted Streaming Content and Evasion of Geolocation: The Applicability of the Copyright Anticircumvention Rules Jerusha Burnett University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mttlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Jerusha Burnett, Geographically Restricted Streaming Content and Evasion of Geolocation: The Applicability of the Copyright Anticircumvention Rules, 19 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 461 (2013). Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mttlr/vol19/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE GEOGRAPHICALLY RESTRICTED STREAMING CONTENT AND EVASION OF GEOLOCATION: THE APPLICABILITY OF THE COPYRIGHT ANTICIRCUMVENTION RULES Jerusha Burnett* Cite as: Jerusha Burnett, Geographically Restricted Streaming Content and Evasion of Geolocation: The Applicability of the Copyright Anticircumvention Rules, 19 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 461 (2012), available at http://www.mttlr.org/volnineteen/burnett.pdf A number of methods currently exist or are being developed to deter- mine where Internet users are located geographicallywhen they access a particularwebpage. Yet regardless of the precautions taken by web- site operators to limit the locationsfrom which they allow access, it is likely that users will find ways to gain access to restricted content.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of IP Addresses Using Fraudulent Geolocation Data
    BENG INDIVIDUAL PROJECT IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTING Identification of IP addresses using fraudulent geolocation data Supervisor: Dr. Sergio Maffeis Author: James Williams Second Marker: Mr. Dominik Harz June 15, 2020 Abstract IP geolocation information is used all over the internet, but is easily faked. A number of differ- ent internet organisations do this – from bulletproof hosting providers attempting to conceal the location of their servers, to VPN providers looking to sell services in countries they don’t have a presence in. Servers using fraudulent IP geolocation in this way may also be more likely to be hosting fraudulent content, making IP geolocation fraud important to detect in the context of in- ternet fraud prevention. In this project, a system has been developed for detecting this kind of IP geolocation fraud. The system developed in this report uses measurements from a global network of measurement servers – an array of 8 servers in 7 different countries managed by Netcraft, and over 10,000 servers in 176 countries through the RIPE Atlas API. Using this system we have analysed the prevalence of geolocation fraud in address space spanning over 4 million IPs, which is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest study of its kind conducted. Despite focusing on only a small part of the IPv4 address space, our analysis has revealed incorrect geolocation being used by over 62,000 internet hosts, targeting 225 out of the 249 possible country codes. In terms of address space, we have discovered incorrect geolocation being used by IP address blocks cumulatively spanning over 2.1 million IPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Client and Server Geolocation Over the Internet
    Secure Client and Server Geolocation Over the Internet AbdelRahman Abdou Paul C. van Oorschot Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada School of Computer Science ETH Zurich,¨ Switzerland Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—In this article, we provide a summary of recent efforts towards achieving Internet geolocation securely, i.e., without allowing the entity being geolocated to cheat about its own geographic location. Cheating motivations arise from many factors, including impersonation (in the case locations are used to reinforce authentication), and gaining location-dependent Fig. 1. Snapshots of the Flagfox browser extension. benefits. In particular, we provide a technical overview of Client Presence Verification (CPV) and Server Location Verification (SLV)—two recently proposed techniques designed to verify the been proposed, but there have been very limited deployment in geographic locations of clients and servers in realtime over the practice. As of this writing, most of the geolocation conducted Internet. Each technique addresses a wide range of adversarial tactics to manipulate geolocation, including the use of IP-hiding in practice relies on the clients’ IP address or GPS coordinates technologies like VPNs and anonymizers, as we now explain. of hand-held devices, as explained below. I. INTRODUCTION A. Geolocation in Practice Internet Geolocation is the process of determining the There are several methods for device geolocation over the geographic location of an Internet-connected device. Secure Internet. If the device belongs to a user that is acting as a geolocating of a web client (a client visiting a website) is web client (i.e., visiting a website), the Geolocation API is a useful for location-aware authentication, location-aware access W3C standard that enables browsers to obtain location infor- control, location-based online voting, location-based social mation of the device they are running on, and communicate networking, and fraud reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Client and Server Geolocation Over the Internet (PDF)
    SECURITY Secure Client and Server Geolocation over the Internet ABDELRAHMAN ABDOU, PAUL C. VAN OORSCHOT AbdelRahman Abdou is a e provide a summary of recent efforts towards achieving Internet Postdoctoral Researcher in geolocation securely, that is, without allowing the entity being the Department of Computer geolocated to cheat about its own geographic location. Cheating Science at ETH Zurich. He W received his PhD (2015) in motivations arise from many factors, including impersonation (if locations systems and computer engineering from are used to reinforce authentication) and gaining location-dependent bene- Carleton University. His research interests fits. In particular, we provide a technical overview of Client Presence Verifi- include location-aware security, SDN security, cation (CPV) and Server Location Verification (SLV)—two recently proposed and using Internet measurements to solve techniques designed to verify the geographic locations of clients and serv- problems related to Internet security. ers in real time over the Internet. Each technique addresses a wide range of [email protected] adversarial tactics to manipulate geolocation, including the use of IP-hiding Paul C. van Oorschot is a technologies like VPNs and anonymizers, as we now explain. Professor of Computer Science Internet geolocation is the process of determining the geographic location of an Internet- at Carleton University, and connected device. Secure geolocating of a web client (a client visiting a website) is useful for the Canada Research Chair in location-aware
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone Data Transfer Protection According to Jurisdiction Regulations
    DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE ICT International Doctoral School University of Trento, Italy Smartphone Data Transfer Protection According to Jurisdiction Regulations Mojtaba Eskandari Advisor Prof. Bruno Crispo, Universit`adegli Studi di Trento, Italy. Co-Advisor Dr. Anderson Santana de Oliveira, SAP Labs, Mougins, France. Examiners Prof. Francesco Bergadano, Universit`adegli Studi di Torino, Italy. Prof. Luigi Vincenzo Mancini, Sapienza-Universit`adi Roma, Italy. Dr. Roberto Carbone, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy. Submission: 31st January 2017, Revision: 24th June 2017, Defense: 3rd July 2017 Abstract The prevalence of mobile devices and their capability to access high speed Internet have transformed them into a portable pocket cloud interface. The sensitivity of a user's personal data demands adequate level of protection in the cloud. In this regard, the European Union Data Protection regula- tions (e.g., article 25.1) restricts the transfer of European users' personal data to certain locations. The matter of concern, however, is the enforce- ment of such regulations. Since cloud service provision is independent of physical location and data can travel to various servers, it is a challenging task to determine the location of data and enforce jurisdiction policies. In this dissertation, first we demonstrate how mobile apps mishandle personal data collection and transfer by analyzing a wide range of popular Android apps in Europe. Then we investigate approaches to monitor and enforce the location restrictions of collected personal data. Since there are multiple entities such as mobile devices, mobile apps, data controllers and cloud providers in the process of collecting and transferring data, we study each one separately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Participatory Approaches Using Geographic Information: Developing a Research Agenda for the 21St Century Steve Carver
    Volume 15 • APA I • 2003 Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association CONTENTS REFEREED 5 Introduction to the Special Issues on Access and Participatory Approaches in Using Geographic Information Harlan J. Onsrud and Max Craglia, Co-Editors 9 Toward a Framework for Research on Geographic Information-Supported Participatory Decision-Making Piotr Jankowski and Timothy Nyerges 19 In Search of Rigorous Models for Policy-oriented Research: A Behavioral Approach to Spatial Data Sharing Uta Wehn de Montalvo 29 Cultural and Institutional Conditions for Using Geographic Information; Access and Participation W.H. Erik de Man 35 A New Era of Accessibility? Sarah Niles and Susan Hanson 43 World Status of National Spatial Data Clearinghouses Joep Crompvoets and Arnold Bregt 51 Access to Geographic Information: A European Perspective Max Craglia and Ian Masser 61 The Future of Participatory Approaches Using Geographic Information: developing a research agenda for the 21st Century Steve Carver 73 Transparency – Considerations for PPGIS Research and Development Christina H. Drew Journal Publisher: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association Editor-in-Chief: Stephen J. Ventura Journal Coordinator: Scott A. Grams Electronic Journal: http://www.urisa.org/journal.htm EDITORIAL OFFICE: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 1460 Renaissance Drive, Suite 305, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068- 1348; Voice (847) 824-6300; Fax (847) 824-6363; E-mail [email protected]. SUBMISSIONS: This publication accepts from authors an exclusive right of first publication to their article plus an accompanying grant of non- exclusive full rights. The publisher requires that full credit for first publication in the URISA Journal is provided in any subsequent electronic or print publications.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Catch When Proxies Lie Verifying the Physical Locations of Network Proxies with Active Geolocation
    How to Catch when Proxies Lie Verifying the Physical Locations of Network Proxies with Active Geolocation Zachary Weinberg Shinyoung Cho Nicolas Christin Carnegie Mellon University Stony Brook University Carnegie Mellon University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Vyas Sekar Phillipa Gill Carnegie Mellon University University of Massachusetts [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Internet users worldwide rely on commercial network proxies both Commercial VPN services compete to offer the highest speed, the to conceal their true location and identity, and to control their appar- strongest privacy assurances, and the broadest possible set of server ent location. Their reasons range from mundane to security-critical. locations. One of the services in this study advertises servers in Proxy operators offer no proof that their advertised server loca- all but seven of the world’s sovereign states, including implausible tions are accurate. IP-to-location databases tend to agree with the locations such as North Korea, Vatican City, and Pitcairn Island. advertised locations, but there have been many reports of serious They offer no proof of their claims. IP-to-location databases often errors in such databases. agree with their claims, but these databases have been shown to In this study we estimate the locations of 2269 proxy servers from be full of errors [18, 38, 42]. Worse, they rely on information that ping-time measurements to hosts in known locations, combined VPN providers may be able to manipulate, such as location codes with AS and network information. These servers are operated by in the names of routers [7].
    [Show full text]