DOCSLIB.ORG

Capacity Impacts of Innovations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capacity Impacts of Innovations Collaborative project SCP3-GA-2013-60560 Increased Capacity 4 Rail networks through enhanced infrastructure and optimized operations FP7-SST-2013-RTD-1 Deliverable 32.2 Capacity impacts of innovations Actual submission date: 31/03/2017 Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Lead beneficiary Linköping University WP 3.2 Simulation and models CAPACITY4RAIL Deliverable 32.2 Capacity impacts of innovations SCP3-GA-2013-605650 31/03/2017 Document status Revision Date Description Reviewed NO CAPACITY4RAIL Page 2 WP 3.2 Simulation and models CAPACITY4RAIL Deliverable 32.2 Capacity impacts of innovations SCP3-GA-2013-605650 31/03/2017 Summary Deliverable D32.2 “Capacity impacts of innovations” summarizes the results of the Capacity 4 Rail work package WP3.2 “Simulation and models to evaluate enhanced capacity (infrastructure and operation)”. Capacity in the railway system can be divided in strategic level (planning of infrastructure), tactical level (timetabling) and operational level (dispatching). Closely related to the operational planning are Driver Advisory Systems (DAS), which in the future may be extended towards fully automatized driving. At strategic level an analysis have been made about line capacity and train capacity for future rail freight corridors. The analysis shows how to increase capacity for future freight trains 2030/2050, by extending the train capacity well as the line capacity and the combination of train and line capacity for futures scenarios. In the future, the processes for tactical and operational planning are merging, meaning that the timetable is no longer a static, or annually updated, product, but a working document that is improved successively, until handed over to operational management. Also in the operational management, we believe that control by planning is a good strategy. Processes for capacity and timetable planning, as well as timetable and traffic simulation systems are under development. The amount of available data is increasing. The main research results of Capaciyt 4Rail SP 3.2 have been: 1. A model framework for modelling and planning of demand and supply of capacity at various levels with micro simulation, data analysis and optimisation. By combining these methods especially tactical and operational planning and control can be improved, and hence, enabling more trains and/or increased on-time performance. 2. A statistical model (LiU model) to forecast delay propagation. The model relies on the theory of Bayesian networks, and can be used both for planning and informing. 3. A demonstrator, CAIN, an extension to the KADR system for timetable and operational traffic developed by Oltis group Czech. The CAIN tool is connected to the LiU model and relies on data from Railsys (micro level infrastructure, complete tracklayout modelled) and Trafikverket database of disturbances and delays Lupp. The demonstrator has been set-up for Malmö – Hallsberg, a part of the Scandinavian Mediterranean corridor TEN-T network. It has given us new knowledge about interaction between IM timetable system and optimisation/data analysis model to predict timetable robustness and punctuality in the network due to changes in the timetable. 4. A separate analysis of space–time points in the timetable critical for robustness. The study of critical points in this project has given knowledge about how to use the method when data is known at micro level, represented by RailSys. The improved robustness is also set in relation to other key performance indicators. CAPACITY4RAIL Page 3 WP 3.2 Simulation and models CAPACITY4RAIL Deliverable 32.2 Capacity impacts of innovations SCP3-GA-2013-605650 31/03/2017 Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Line capacity and train capacity for future rail freight corridors ........................................................... 8 1.2 Direction of work ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Outline ................................................................................................................................................. 13 2 Enhancing frameworks for modelling and simulation ................................................................................... 14 2.1 Existing framework for modelling and simulation of railway traffic .................................................... 14 2.2 Analysis of the current framework ...................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Enhancements in safety and signalling systems .................................................................................. 17 2.4 Modifications in operational traffic and train control ......................................................................... 21 3 Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................................. 26 3.1 Integration of uncertainty in real-time traffic control framework ....................................................... 26 3.2 Uncertainty modelling with Bayesian networks – setup and initial results ......................................... 29 3.3 Stochastic prediction of train delays with dynamic Bayesian networks .............................................. 33 3.4 Conclusions and future research ......................................................................................................... 36 4 Oltis IT systems .............................................................................................................................................. 38 4.1 ICT SYSTEMS FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGER (IM) .................................................................. 38 4.2 IS KADR ................................................................................................................................................ 39 4.3 ISOŘ ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 4.4 DOMIN ................................................................................................................................................. 42 5 Oltis demonstrator and demonstrations ....................................................................................................... 43 5.1 Demonstrator ...................................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Data Malmö–Hallsberg ........................................................................................................................ 45 5.3 Conceptual link between LiU and Oltis ................................................................................................ 51 5.4 Implementation of the LiU-model ....................................................................................................... 52 6 Scenario Malmö – Hallsberg, CAIN – LiU model ............................................................................................ 57 6.1 Statistical analysis of historical traffic data .......................................................................................... 58 6.2 Calibration of the LiU-model ............................................................................................................... 60 6.3 Numerical results ................................................................................................................................. 63 7 Increasing timetable robustness ................................................................................................................... 65 7.1 Inserting Buffer Time as a Knapsack Problem...................................................................................... 66 7.2 Evaluation of Robustness in Critical Points in a microscopic environment .......................................... 73 CAPACITY4RAIL Page 4 WP 3.2 Simulation and models CAPACITY4RAIL Deliverable 32.2 Capacity impacts of innovations SCP3-GA-2013-605650 31/03/2017 8 Conclusions and lessons learned................................................................................................................... 90 8.1 IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................................... 90 8.2 Conclusions and lessons learned ......................................................................................................... 91 9 List of references ........................................................................................................................................... 94 Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................ 98 Appendix 1 ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investing in Mobility
    Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION THE EAST OF HUDSON RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONS TASK FORCE Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION Environmental Defense and the East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force On the cover Left:Trucks exacerbate crippling congestion on the Cross-Bronx Expressway (photo by Adam Gitlin). Top right: A CSX Q116-23 intermodal train hauls double-stack containers in western New York. (photo by J. Henry Priebe Jr.). Bottom right: A New York Cross Harbor Railroad “piggypacker” transfers a low-profile container from rail to a trailer (photo by Adam Gitlin). Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. The East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force is committed to the restoration of price- and service-competitive freight rail service in the areas of the New York metropolitan region east of the Hudson River. The Task Force seeks to accomplish this objective through bringing together elected officials, carriers and public agencies at regularly scheduled meetings where any issue that hinders or can assist in the restoration of competitive rail service is discussed openly. It is expected that all participants will work toward the common goal of restoring competitive rail freight service East of the Hudson. ©2004 Environmental Defense Printed on 100% (50% post-consumer) recycled paper, 100% chlorine free.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Combined Transport Terminal Operations Identification of Measures to Improve Terminals in BSR
    RAPORT Analysis of combined transport terminal operations Identification of measures to improve terminals in BSR Activity: WP 3, Activity 1 Version: Final Date: 06/03/2020 Bogusz Wiśnicki City of Bydgoszcz CONTENTS Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Classification of combined transport terminals ............................................................................... 4 1.1. Types and categories of terminals .......................................................................................... 4 1.2. Representative terminal models.............................................................................................. 9 2. Infrastructure of combined transport terminals ............................................................................. 11 2.1. Elements of infrastructure of combined transport terminals ................................................. 11 2.2. Large rail-road terminal ......................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Small rail-road terminal ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Trimodal river terminal .......................................................................................................... 16 2.5. Border terminal .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Capacity Utilization of Shuttle Trains in Intermodal Transport by Investing in Transshipment Technologies for Non- Cranable Semi-Trailers
    Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference T. M. K. Roeder, P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, and S. E. Chick, eds. INCREASING CAPACITY UTILIZATION OF SHUTTLE TRAINS IN INTERMODAL TRANSPORT BY INVESTING IN TRANSSHIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR NON- CRANABLE SEMI-TRAILERS Ralf Elbert Daniel Reinhardt Chair of Management and Logistics Technische Universität Darmstadt Hochschulstraße 1 Darmstadt, D-64289 Darmstadt, GERMANY ABSTRACT For shuttle trains with a fixed transport capacity which are the dominant operating form in intermodal transport, increasing capacity utilization is of crucial importance due to the low marginal costs of transporting an additional loading unit. Hence, offering rail-based transport services for non-cranable semi-trailers can result in additional earnings for railway companies. However, these earnings have to compensate for the investment costs of the technology. Based on a dynamic investment calculation, this paper presents a simulation model to evaluate the economic profitability of transshipment technologies for non-cranable semi-trailers from the railway company’s perspective. The results depend on the capacity utilization risk faced by the railway company. In particular, if the railway company does not sell all the train capacity to freight forwarders or intermodal operators on a long-term basis, investing in technology for the transshipment of non-cranable semi-trailers can be economically profitable. 1 INTRODUCTION Freight volume is predicted to increase in the years to come and the majority of this growth is expected to even increase the road freight transport volume. According to forecasts the total road freight transport volume in the European Union will grow to 2442 billion ton kilometers (tkm) in 2030 which is an increase of 43% compared to 2005 (Rich and Hansen 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Deflection Estimation of Edge Supported Reinforced Concrete
    STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH Md. Tareq Yasin DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY May, 2010 STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH by Md. Tareq Yasin MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (Transportation) Department of Civil Engineering BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, DHAKA 2010 ii The thesis titled “STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH”, Submitted by Md. Tareq Yasin, Roll No: 100504413F, Session: October-2005, has been accepted as satisfactory in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering in Civil Engineering (Transportation). BOARD OF EXAMINERS 1. __________________________ Dr. Hasib Mohammed Ahsan Chairman Professor (Supervisor) Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 2. __________________________ Dr. Md. Zoynul Abedin Member Professor & Head Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 3. __________________________ Dr. Md. Mizanur Rahman Member Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 iii CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION It is hereby declared that this project or any part of it has not been submitted elsewhere for the award of any degree or diploma. ____________________ (Md. Tareq Yasin) iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, the author wishes to convey his profound gratitude to Almighty Allah for giving him this opportunity and for enabling him to complete the project successfully. This project paper is an accumulation of many people’s endeavor. For this, the author is acknowledged to a number of people who helped to prepare this and for their kind advices, suggestions, directions, and cooperation and proper guidelines for this. The author wishes to express his heartiest gratitude and profound indebtedness to his supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Base and Comparative Analysis of CT and Transhipment Technologies for CT
    Data base and comparative analysis of CT and transhipment technologies for CT Deliverable D.T.1.2.1. 1 Document Title: Data base and comparative analysis of CT and transhipment technolo- Sub Title: gies for CT Document Version Comments Date Done by History Draft prefilled Template on CT Transhipment 18/4/2017 UM concept Technologies (OBB) Version 01 Draft version 1 with comparative analyses 27/11/2017 SSP (OBB) ITTL Inputs on CT processes , supply chain and Ter- 23/1/2018 LKZ(AKL) minal Villach Design and added pictures 30/1/2018 SSP(OBB) LCA (AKL) Version 2 Additional inputs and comments from partners 20/2/2018 ZAILOG SGKV (BHG) TX EURAC Finalisation 14/3/2018 SSP (OBB) UM Number of pages: 114 Number of annexes: 1 Prepared by: University of Maribor, SSP Consult principal Author(s): Mitja Klemenčič Robert Burg Contribution: AKL; ITTL; LCA, LKZ, EURAC, SGKV, BHG, ZAI- Contributing Author(s):Stane Božičnik LOG, BMVIT Roberto Federico Sebastian Ruckes Alberto Milotti Vlasta Rodošek Tomislav Letnik Katja Hanžič Mateja Matajič Klemen Gostič Juergen Neugebauer Peer Review Partner Date UM 18.3.2018 Approval for delivery AlpinnoCT Coordinator Date SSP Consult for StMB 30.03.2018 2 Content Summary .................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 16 2 CT Processes and supply chain in CT ................................................................................. 17 2.1 General description of CT processes for the first mile, long haul and last mile ....... 22 2.1.1 Maritime Combined Transport: First mile/pre-haul .......................................... 22 2.1.2 Continental Combined Transport: First mile ...................................................... 24 2.1.3 Description of CT processes for the long haul ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Trains! Pdf Free Download
    TRAINS! PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Susan E Goodman | 48 pages | 27 Mar 2012 | Random House USA Inc | 9780375869419 | English | New York, United States Train - Wikipedia From expert analysis of the latest news to in-depth stories on railroading's rich history. Trains has it all. Garden Railways magazine — G and large scale. Garden Railways has been the leading magazine devoted to the hobby of outdoor, large-scale model railroading for more than 25 years. Classic Trains magazine — the golden years. Classic Trains is a quarterly magazine celebrating the "golden years of railroading. The 1 online destination for train enthusiasts. Welcome to the online home of Kalmbach Publishing's five railroading-related magazines. Whether you're here to read the latest railroad news or to explore the hobby of model trains, we have something for every rail enthusiast. Here you can browse our sites, sign up for free newsletters, and more! To view a video introduction to model trains with actor Michael Gross, click here. Newsletter Sign-Up. By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. Please view our privacy policy. Trains announces launch of Trains. Wheel Rail Interaction Conference. Presented by Trains Magazine. Steam Over Cumbres. CSX at Turbine Power. Real Stories of the Rails. Oxford Diecast. USA Trains. Central Valley. Deluxe Innovations. Pacific Fast Mail. Penn Line. Woodland Scenics. Christmas Train Set. Ls Models. Train Layout. Electric Train Set. Marx Train Accessories. Brand see all. Year see all. Material see all. Cast Iron. Pressed Steel. Grading see all. C Mint-Brand New.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Toward the Freight System of 2030-2050 (Final) Submission Date: 24/02/2017 Deliverable 21.2
    D3.1.1 – Review of existing practices to improve CAPACITY4RAIL capacity on the European rail network SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Requirements toward the freight system of 2030-2050 (Final) Submission date: 24/02/2017 Deliverable 21.2 D21.2 – Requirement s toward the freight system of 2030 - CAPACITY4RAIL 2050 (Final) SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Lead contractor for this deliverable: • KTH Project coordinator • International Union of Railways, UIC CAPACITY4RAIL PUBLIC Page 2 D21.2. - Requirements toward the freight system of CAPACITY4RAIL 2030/2050 (Final) SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Executive Summary The total demand for freight in Europe has increased rapidly in recent decades, but rail freight has lost market share and most of the increase has been handled by trucks. In the last decade, rail markets share has increased in some countries because of deregulation, investments in rail and truck fees, but is still very low in many countries. In the new member states the markets have decreased rapidly when rail monopoly has been taken away. Rail deregulation has not been implemented in practice in all countries while at the same time truck deregulation has been implemented fully and resulted in a low-cost truck market. Moreover, the cost of external effects has not yet been implemented. Most forecasts show an increase of 60% in total freight demand by 2050 and an approximately constant market share with a business-as-usual scenario. To fulfil the targets in the EU white paper, it is necessary to roughly double rails’ market share from 18% in 2011 to at least 36% in 2050. This means that the tonne-kilometres will be 3.6 times as much as today and 2.4 times as much as in a business- as-usual scenario in 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe
    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Enlocc Newsletter 2014-3 Final
    Open ENLoCC Newsletter III / 2014 Open ENLoCC Newsletter III / 2014 Dear Members and Friends, In late 2014, the European Network of Regional Logistics Competence Centers “Open ENLoCC” is pleased to send out a new version of its Newsletter. As always, there is plenty of news: • NiKRASA and related intermodal technologies. • ALICE and the European Forum on Logistic Clusters. • Network News from Open ENLoCC partners. • Next dates. Besides, Open ENLoCC knows the Circles of Brussels. See page 7. Best regards Martin Brandt Secretary “Open ENLoCC” 1 Open ENLoCC Newsletter III / 2014 “NiKRASA” Combined transport is not just overseas containers, but also overland routes. Long distance land transport is mostly done by semi-trailers. Craning them onto railway cars has so far been impossible, unless the trailers were specially designed. Since few forwarders went for this extra weight and complexity, most of the trailers were not available for rail transport beyond the very limited offers of the “rolling highway”. In past years, many different approaches were made to overcome this limitation and to make combined transport available for all forwarders and operators: - Craneable semi-trailers are held for rent by rail operators’ subdivisions, so that new customers have feasible equipment from the start. - Special flatcars were designed, which in combination with specifically adapted terminals do allow rolling the trailers onto trains. Such proprietary systems (CargoBeamer and Modalohr) operate on some routes. - A new approach is to convert a standard semi-trailer into a craneable semi-trailer, which appears possible in many cases. These approaches work well in their niche. However, they do not overcome the general distinction between craneable and non-craneable semi-trailers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Report on Combined Transport in Europe
    2012 Report on Combined Transport in Europe December 2012 ISBN 978-2-7461-2130-0 Warning No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or distributed by any means whatsoever, including electronic, except for private and individual use, without the express permission of the International Union of Railways (UIC). The same applies for translation, adaptation or transformation, arrangement or reproduction by any method or procedure whatsoever. The sole exceptions - noting the author’s name and the source -are «analyses and brief quotations justified by the critical, argumentative, educational, scientific or informative nature of the publication into which they are incorpo- rated» (Articles L 122-4 and L122-5 of the French Intellectual Property Code). © International Union of Railways (UIC) - Paris, 2012 December 2012 | 3 List of contents Foreword by the UIC Combined Transport Group Chairman ................ 5 1. Unaccompanied combined rail/road transport volumes ................. 7 1.1. Methodological remarks ........................................................................................7 1.2. Unaccompanied combined transport volumes 2011 v 2009 ................................9 1.3. Time series of unaccompanied combined transport until 2011 ..........................18 2. Accompanied combined rail/road transport volumes ................... 25 2.1. Size of market and statistical sources .................................................................25 2.2. Accompanied combined transport volumes 2011 v 2009...................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Future Prospects on Railway Freight Transportation a Particular View of the Weight Issue on Intermodal Trains
    Future Prospects on Railway Freight Transportation A Particular View of the Weight Issue on Intermodal Trains vorgelegt von Dipl.‐Ing. Armando Carrillo Zanuy aus Barcelona, Spanien von der Fakultät V – Verkehrs‐ und Maschinensysteme der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften ‐ Dr.‐Ing. – genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. phil. D. Manzey Berichter: Prof. Dr.‐Ing. J. Siegmann Berichter: Prof. Dr.‐Ing. M. Hecht Berichter: Prof. B. Nelldal Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 28. November 2012 Berlin 2013 D 83 Armando Carrillo Zanuy 2012 [email protected]‐berlin.de Fachgebiet Schienenfahrwege und Bahnbetrieb Technische Universität Berlin Germany CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Scientific Approach ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Goal & hypothesis .............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Report on Combined Transport in Europe ISBN 978-2-7461-2580-3
    2016 REPOrt ON BSL Transportation Consultants GmbH & Co. KG International Union of Railways Cölln Haus 16 rue Jean Rey Brodschrangen 3 – 5 75015 Paris COMBINED TRANSPORT 20457 Hamburg FRANCE GERMANY T +33 (0) 1 44 49 20 20 IN EUROPE T +49 (0) 40 22 63 670 00 [email protected] [email protected] www.uic.org www.bsl-transportation.com January 2017 © ETF publication - 2017 2016 REPORT ON COMBINED TRANSPORT IN EUROPE ISBN 978-2-7461-2580-3 Warning No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or distributed by any means whatsoever, including electronic, except for private and individual use, without the express permission of the International Union of Railways (UIC). The same applies for translation, adaptation or transformation, arrangement or reproduction by any method or procedure whatsoever. The sole exceptions - noting the author’s name and the source -are «analyses and brief quotations justified by the critical, argumentative, educational, scientific or informative nature of the publication into which they are incorporated» (Articles L 122-4 and L122-5 of the French Intellectual Property Code). © International Union of Railways (UIC) - Paris, 2017. 2016 Report on Combined Transport in Europe | January 2017 Table of contents Foreword by the UIC Combined Transport Group Chairman....................4 1. Rail/road combined transport in Europe at a glance.........................5 2. General framework and key elements of combined transport in Europe.............................................................................................9 2.1. Combined transport as major element of the European freight market........9 2.2. Market structure and key elements of combined transport........................13 3. The European rail/road combined transport market - facts and figures........................................................................................15 3.1.
    [Show full text]