Analyses on Condom Evidence: Condom Brand Profiling Via HS-SPME-GC-MS and Temperature-Brand Effect on Condom Fingerprint Development
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analyses on condom evidence: Condom brand profiling via HS-SPME-GC-MS and temperature-brand effect on condom fingerprint development by Amanda Patrick, B.S. A Thesis In Forensic Sciences Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Paola Prada, Ph. D. Chair of Committee Kathy Sperry, Ph. D. Megan Thoen, Ph. D. Mark Sheridan, Ph. D. Dean of the Graduate School December, 2018 © 2018, Amanda Patrick Texas Tech University, Amanda Patrick, December 2018 Acknowledgments The authors of this study would like to thank the participants who made this study possible. ii Texas Tech University, Amanda Patrick, December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... xi 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.Statement of Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2 1.1.1. Fingerprints on Condoms ......................................................................................... 2 1.1.2. Condom Brand Identification................................................................................... 3 2. Literature Review .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.Impact of Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases ....................................................................... 5 2.1.1. Limitations in Investigation ..................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. Forensic Evidence .................................................................................................. 16 2.2.Basic Condom Production .................................................................................................. 22 2.3.Substrate effect on Fingerprint Development .................................................................. 23 2.3.1. Challenging Substrates ........................................................................................... 24 2.3.2. Variation of Developmental Methods .................................................................... 24 2.3.3. Challenges with Single Types of Substrates .......................................................... 27 2.3.4. Environmental Conditions & Development with Powders .................................... 31 2.4.Chemical Characterization of Condoms ........................................................................... 32 2.4.1. Previous Methods Used for Identifying Condom Brands and Lubricants ............. 32 2.4.2. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ............................................................. 35 2.4.3. Solid Phase Microextraction .................................................................................. 39 2.4.4. SPME and Plastics ................................................................................................. 42 2.4.5. Principle Component Analysis............................................................................... 46 2.5.Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................... 49 2.5.1. Temperature Variation on Fingerprint Development ............................................. 49 2.5.2. Condom Brand Identification................................................................................. 50 3. Methods ................................................................................................................................. 52 3.1.Temperature Effect on Fingerprint Development ........................................................... 52 iii Texas Tech University, Amanda Patrick, December 2018 3.1.1. Materials ................................................................................................................ 52 3.1.2. Experimental Procedures ....................................................................................... 53 3.1.3. Inter-person Variability .......................................................................................... 57 3.1.4. Dye Staining ─ Rhodamine 6G ............................................................................. 58 3.2.Condom Brand Identification using HS-SPME ............................................................... 58 3.2.1. Materials and Standard Instrumental Procedures ................................................... 58 3.2.2. Experimental Procedures ....................................................................................... 60 3.3.Data Collection and Analyses ............................................................................................. 63 3.3.1. Condom Brand SPME Profiling ............................................................................ 63 3.3.2. Fingerprint Development ─ Temperature Effect ................................................... 63 4. Results ................................................................................................................................... 64 4.1.Temperature-Brand Effect on Fingerprint Development ............................................... 64 4.1.1. Magnetic Powder ................................................................................................... 64 4.1.2. Inter-person Variability ─ Magnetic Powder ......................................................... 67 4.1.3. Rhodamine 6G ....................................................................................................... 69 4.1.4. Inter-person Variability-Rhodamine 6G ................................................................ 73 4.2.Condom Brand Identification via HS-SPME-GC-MS ..................................................... 75 4.2.1. Fiber and Sampling Time ....................................................................................... 75 4.2.2. Brand identification ............................................................................................... 78 5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 82 5.1.Temperature analysis on Fingerprint Development ........................................................ 82 5.2.Identification of Condom Brands ...................................................................................... 85 5.3.Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 88 References ..................................................................................................................................... 91 Appendix I: Photographs and Scores of Developed Fingerprints ........................................... 98 Magnetic Power ......................................................................................................................... 99 15ºC ............................................................................................................................... 99 24ºC ............................................................................................................................. 101 40ºC ............................................................................................................................. 103 iv Texas Tech University, Amanda Patrick, December 2018 Magnetic Powder ─ Population ............................................................................................. 106 Rhodamine 6G ......................................................................................................................... 111 15ºC ............................................................................................................................. 111 24ºC ............................................................................................................................. 113 40ºC ............................................................................................................................. 115 Rhodamine 6G ─ Population ................................................................................................. 118 Appendix II: Compound Data and Chromatograms .............................................................. 123 v Texas Tech University, Amanda Patrick, December 2018 ABSTRACT Condoms are a challenging substrate as an evidentiary item since they do not hold a determined shape and fundamental composition may vary depending on the brand. Developmental variables in regard to condoms substrates were investigated to optimize latent print methodologies. Fingerprints were deposited onto condoms of various brands, exposed to different temperatures, and developed with superglue fuming, magnetic powder, and Rhodamine 6G (R6G). For magnetic powder, results indicated that the highest average fingerprint score was obtained on condoms stored in 15°C temperatures.