DOCSLIB.ORG

Meaningless Questions in Cosmology and Relativistic Astrophysics M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meaningless Questions in Cosmology and Relativistic Astrophysics M Band 31a Zeitschrift für Naturforschung Heft 11 Meaningless Questions in Cosmology and Relativistic Astrophysics M. Heller Obserwatorium Astronomiczne Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego, Krakow, Poland and M. Reinhardt Astronomisches Institut der Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, FRG (Z. Naturforsch. 31a, 1271-1276 [1976]; received June 26, 1976) After a general classification of meaningless questions in science we concentrate on empirically meaningless questions. Introducing the concepts of informationally connected, semiconnected and disconnected observers, a formalism for the analysis of the informational structure of space-time is developed. We discuss some problems of epistemological nature in cosmology and blade hole phys- ics. A number of questions like "What was 'before' the initial singularity of the universe?" or "What is the fate of matter in gravitational collapse inside the event horizon?" turn out to be empirically meaningless. We also show that a "wormhole" does not violate causality for the set of informationally connected observers who do not enter it. I. Introduction going to define and discuss meaningless questions in relativistic astrophysics and cosmology. In gen- Questions of epistemological nature often occur eral we call a question meaningless, if there is in in cosmology and in relativistic astrophysics, in principle no answer to it. Since there are different particular after the boom in black hole physics. kind of possible answers, we distinguish several Frequently these problems are either treated in a classes of meaningless questions. sloppy way, or their epistemological nature is not Meaningless questions of the first kind are of even recognized. In the present paper we attempt to tautological nature. These are meaningless questions sort out physically meaningless questions in this by definition. If, for example, we define the universe field. as "everything that exists", the question "what is In philosophy the term "meaningless" is histo- outside the universe?" is tautologically meaningless. rically burdened with the definition of "meaning" Meaningless questions of the second kind are by the positivistic and neopositivistic schools of theory dependent. These are questions to which one thought. The Vienna circle called a statement, even cannot get an answer within the framework of a a universal one, "meaningless", if it is not empiri- given theory. There are two subclasses: theoretically cally "verifiable" 1_4. They identified "non-empiri- and empirically meaningless questions. A question cal" and "non-verifiable" with "meaningless" and is theoretically meaningless in the framework of a "metaphysical". This definition was so narrow that given theory, if the theory does not provide any it excluded physical laws, which are always uni- tools to answer the question. E. g. questions about versal statements, from the realm of science. Pop- quantum effects are theoretically meaningless in a per 5 sharpened the "criterion of demarcation" be- classical field theory like Maxwell's theory. Ques- tween science and non-science by substituting the tions are empirically meaningless, if in principle term "verifiability" by "falsifiability" of a state- there cannot be an empirical (observational) an- ment. This was an improvement with respect to the swer to them within the framework of a given problem of empirical testability of scientific theo- theory. They relate to empirically untestable predic- ries. tions of a theory and do occur often in black hole However even Popper's approach to the testabi- physics (see Section IV). lity of theories has been criticized as still too nar- In a given theory a theoretically meaningless 6 7 row ' . We will not deal here with the complicated question is also empirically meaningless, since the problem of the relations between theories and em- theory is unable to give any answer to the question, pirical data. Our scope is much simpler. We are which could be tested empirically. The reverse is not true. A question may be empirically meaningless Reprint requests to M. Reinhardt, Astronomisches Insti- and yet theoretically meaningful. This situation does tut der Ruhr-Universität, Postfach 102148, D-4630 Bo- chum, FRG. arise in relativistic astrophysics. General relativity 1272 M. Heller and M. Reinhardt • Meaningless Questions in Cosmology and Relativistic Astrophysics is quite capable to make predictions about regions time is measured by atomic, thermodynamical, or of space-time which will never be observable to us biological clocks, which can be non-metric and ir- in the framework of the theory (see Sects. Ill and regular. The only requirement is that these clocks IV). Although we will never be able to check these are monotonical, i. e. that informations arriving predictions of the theory empirically, their mathe- continuously to an observer form an ordered set8- matical treatment can help considerably towards a If a light signal emitted by an observer Q is better understanding of the theory. In the following received by an observer P we call it a message8 we will concentrate on the problem of empirical from Q to P. If there is a message from Q to P we meaning. say that P is informationally semiconnected with Q, If one asks a question by setting up an obser- or more precisely: vational device, to which one cannot obtain, in prin- ciple, an answer in terms of measurable data, i. e. Definition 2 : any information, this question is empirically mean- P is informationally semiconnected with Q, with ingless. Even if the question is theoretically not respect to U cJll, P\\\ Q, iff for every pE P n U meaningless, it can never be used to test the theory. u Thus the central term of scientific epistemology is there is a q^Q such that q<^ p. Obviously we have: P |>| Q => P |\| Q . information. u u Definition 3: II. Informational Structure of Space-Time If P|>|(?=>3 VeJA such that <?|>|P, we call We consider space-time, i. e. the set 7A = u v U and V informationally symmetric. {p, q, ..., x, y, ...} of elements called events, and two subsets of JA\ £. = L , ...}, the elements 2 Definition 4: of which are called light rays, light signals or If P |>| Q => Q |>| P, we call U informationally simply photons, and P = {P, Q, ..., X, Y, ...} the u u elements of which are called observers. Note that normal. Every informationally normal set is infor- the words "photon", "observer" etc. are used (for mationally symmetric with itself. Minkowski flat brevity) instead of "history (or world line) of a space-time is informationally normal. photon or observer"8. In principle every timelike On on informationally normal set we have: curve may be considered as an observer, however in the following we shall consider only geodesic ob- P\>\QoQ\\\P AP\WQ servers, i. e. timelike geodesies. We define the set of informationally connected ob- If from an observer P a light signal is emitted servers to the observer P with respect to Uc'M: towards an observer Q, reflected at Q and received bade in a finite proper time at P, we call it an Definition 5: echo 7 from Q to P and we write P |>| Q. SI C,(P) = {IeP:?Hl}. If there is an echo from Q to P we say that P is u informationally connected with Q. We express this A SICj' (P) is called an extension of SICJJ(P), if more precisely as follows. UcV and SIC[7(P)cSICF(P). A set of informa- tionally connected observers is called inextendible, Definition 1: if V V^U, VcWl:SlCu{P) =SICF(P). We define P is informationally connected with Q, with re- the set of informationally semiconnected observers spect to UcWl, P|>| Q, iff for every p^Pn U P u to the observer with respect to Ucy\{: there are a q^Q and a p2ePrs\ U such that Pi\q ! and q^po, with the condition that [ t (p2) — t (px) Definition 6: is finite. SlSu(P)={XeV:P\\\ X] . u Here ' t(p2) — f(pi)' denotes the proper time of the observer P elapsed between the events pi and p2. Inextendible sets of informationally semiconnected p ^ q is the so-called horizmodial relation; it should observers are defined as above with SIS instead of be read "q lies on the light cone of p" 9. Proper SIC everywhere. 1273 M. Heller and M. Reinhardt • Meaningless Questions in Cosmology and Relativistic Astrophysics Proposition 1 : One can construct as a "gedankenexperiment" Let N be an informationally normal region of multiply semiconnected sets of observers SICj (i = 1, ... ,n) space-time. Every observer in N belongs to exactly so that some SIC/,- can receive informa- one of pairwise disjoint sets of informationally tions from SIQ to SIQ + Wt' which are all mutually (semi) connected observers. informationally disconnected, but not vice versa, or so that SICo to SICn, all mutually informationally Proof. Within N, |>| and |\| are equivalence disconnected, can receive informations from SICX, relations. (Attention: relations |>| and |\| are de- but not vice versa (e. g. n — 1 black holes in the fined relatively to a subset U of y\il) universe SIC^. One can image also a hierarchy of For abstractions of these relations we may simply semiconnected sets, so that SICj can transmit in- write SICj, SIS; (i = 1,2, ...) without reference to formation to SIQ + i' but not the other way round. a single observer. Obviously by combination of these possibilities one Proposition 2: can construct very complicated informational struc- tures. We will not go into further details of this (P) . SIC[/(P)USISF(P) = SISj/u V informational topology. The main point is that, The set of observers may have a more complicated however complicated the structure for any given SIC, structure, for instance we may consider an infor- it is uniquely determined what empirically meaning- mationally semi-connected set of informationally ful and meaningless questions are. Thus the notion connected observers defined by: "empirically meaningless question" is relative, but (SIC)1|\|(SIC)2i.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild
    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric An Honors thesis presented to the faculty of the Departments of Physics and Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Scholar and Honors-in-Discipline Programs for a Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics by David Simpson April 2007 Robert Gardner, Ph.D. Mark Giroux, Ph.D. Keywords: differential geometry, general relativity, Schwarzschild metric, black holes ABSTRACT The Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric by David Simpson We briefly discuss some underlying principles of special and general relativity with the focus on a more geometric interpretation. We outline Einstein’s Equations which describes the geometry of spacetime due to the influence of mass, and from there derive the Schwarzschild metric. The metric relies on the curvature of spacetime to provide a means of measuring invariant spacetime intervals around an isolated, static, and spherically symmetric mass M, which could represent a star or a black hole. In the derivation, we suggest a concise mathematical line of reasoning to evaluate the large number of cumbersome equations involved which was not found elsewhere in our survey of the literature. 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................. 2 1 Introduction to Relativity ...................... 4 1.1 Minkowski Space ....................... 6 1.2 What is a black hole? ..................... 11 1.3 Geodesics and Christoffel Symbols ............. 14 2 Einstein’s Field Equations and Requirements for a Solution .17 2.1 Einstein’s Field Equations .................. 20 3 Derivation of the Schwarzschild Metric .............. 21 3.1 Evaluation of the Christoffel Symbols .......... 25 3.2 Ricci Tensor Components .................
    [Show full text]
  • (2020) Wormholes and the Thermodynamic Arrow of Time
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 043095 (2020) Wormholes and the thermodynamic arrow of time Zhuo-Yu Xian1,* and Long Zhao1,2,† 1CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China 2School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (Received 16 March 2020; accepted 11 June 2020; published 19 October 2020) In classical thermodynamics, heat cannot spontaneously pass from a colder system to a hotter system, which is called the thermodynamic arrow of time. However, if the initial states are entangled, the direction of the thermo- dynamic arrow of time may not be guaranteed. Here we take the thermofield double state at 0 + 1 dimension as the initial state and assume its gravity duality to be the eternal black hole in AdS2 space. We make the temperature difference between the two sides by changing the Hamiltonian. We turn on proper interactions between the two sides and calculate the changes in energy and entropy. The energy transfer, as well as the thermodynamic arrow of time, are mainly determined by the competition between two channels: thermal diffusion and anomalous heat flow. The former is not related to the wormhole and obeys the thermodynamic arrow of time; the latter is related to the wormhole and reverses the thermodynamic arrow of time, i.e., transferring energy from the colder side to the hotter side at the cost of entanglement consumption. Finally, we find that the thermal diffusion wins the competition, and the whole thermodynamic arrow of time has not been reversed. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043095 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Hawking: 'There Are No Black Holes' Notion of an 'Event Horizon', from Which Nothing Can Escape, Is Incompatible with Quantum Theory, Physicist Claims
    NATURE | NEWS Stephen Hawking: 'There are no black holes' Notion of an 'event horizon', from which nothing can escape, is incompatible with quantum theory, physicist claims. Zeeya Merali 24 January 2014 Artist's impression VICTOR HABBICK VISIONS/SPL/Getty The defining characteristic of a black hole may have to give, if the two pillars of modern physics — general relativity and quantum theory — are both correct. Most physicists foolhardy enough to write a paper claiming that “there are no black holes” — at least not in the sense we usually imagine — would probably be dismissed as cranks. But when the call to redefine these cosmic crunchers comes from Stephen Hawking, it’s worth taking notice. In a paper posted online, the physicist, based at the University of Cambridge, UK, and one of the creators of modern black-hole theory, does away with the notion of an event horizon, the invisible boundary thought to shroud every black hole, beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape. In its stead, Hawking’s radical proposal is a much more benign “apparent horizon”, “There is no escape from which only temporarily holds matter and energy prisoner before eventually a black hole in classical releasing them, albeit in a more garbled form. theory, but quantum theory enables energy “There is no escape from a black hole in classical theory,” Hawking told Nature. Peter van den Berg/Photoshot and information to Quantum theory, however, “enables energy and information to escape from a escape.” black hole”. A full explanation of the process, the physicist admits, would require a theory that successfully merges gravity with the other fundamental forces of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Holes. the Universe. Today’S Lecture
    Physics 311 General Relativity Lecture 18: Black holes. The Universe. Today’s lecture: • Schwarzschild metric: discontinuity and singularity • Discontinuity: the event horizon • Singularity: where all matter falls • Spinning black holes •The Universe – its origin, history and fate Schwarzschild metric – a vacuum solution • Recall that we got Schwarzschild metric as a solution of Einstein field equation in vacuum – outside a spherically-symmetric, non-rotating massive body. This metric does not apply inside the mass. • Take the case of the Sun: radius = 695980 km. Thus, Schwarzschild metric will describe spacetime from r = 695980 km outwards. The whole region inside the Sun is unreachable. • Matter can take more compact forms: - white dwarf of the same mass as Sun would have r = 5000 km - neutron star of the same mass as Sun would be only r = 10km • We can explore more spacetime with such compact objects! White dwarf Black hole – the limit of Schwarzschild metric • As the massive object keeps getting more and more compact, it collapses into a black hole. It is not just a denser star, it is something completely different! • In a black hole, Schwarzschild metric applies all the way to r = 0, the black hole is vacuum all the way through! • The entire mass of a black hole is concentrated in the center, in the place called the singularity. Event horizon • Let’s look at the functional form of Schwarzschild metric again: ds2 = [1-(2m/r)]dt2 – [1-(2m/r)]-1dr2 - r2dθ2 -r2sin2θdφ2 • We want to study the radial dependence only, and at fixed time, i.e. we set dφ = dθ = dt = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Cosmological Horizons in a Concordance Universe
    Evolution of the Cosmological Horizons in a Concordance Universe Berta Margalef–Bentabol 1 Juan Margalef–Bentabol 2;3 Jordi Cepa 1;4 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de la Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain: 2Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain. 3Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain. 4Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. Abstract The particle and event horizons are widely known and studied concepts, but the study of their properties, in particular their evolution, have only been done so far considering a single state equation in a deceler- ating universe. This paper is the first of two where we study this problem from a general point of view. Specifically, this paper is devoted to the study of the evolution of these cosmological horizons in an accel- erated universe with two state equations, cosmological constant and dust. We have obtained closed-form expressions for the horizons, which have allowed us to compute their velocities in terms of their respective recession velocities that generalize the previous results for one state equation only. With the equations of state considered, it is proved that both velocities remain always positive. Keywords: Physics of the early universe – Dark energy theory – Cosmological simulations This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. IOP Publishing Ltd/SISSA Medialab srl is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hole in the Black Hole
    Open Journal of Mathematics and Physics | Volume 2, Article 78, 2020 | ISSN: 2674-5747 https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/js7rf | published: 7 Feb 2020 | https://ojmp.wordpress.com DA [microresearch] Diamond Open Access A hole in the black hole Open Physics Collaboration∗† April 19, 2020 Abstract Supposedly, matter falls inside the black hole whenever it reaches its event horizon. The Planck scale, however, imposes a limit on how much matter can occupy the center of a black hole. It is shown here that the density of matter exceeds Planck density in the singularity, and as a result, spacetime tears apart. After the black hole is formed, matter flows from its center to its border due to a topological force, namely, the increase on the tear of spacetime due to its limit until it reaches back to the event horizon, generating the firewall phenomenon. We conclude that there is no spacetime inside black holes. We propose a solution to the black hole information paradox. keywords: black hole information paradox, singularity, firewall, entropy, topology, quantum gravity Introduction 1. Black holes are controversial astronomical objects [1] exhibiting such a strong gravitational field that nothing–not even light–can escape from inside it [2]. ∗All authors with their affiliations appear at the end of this paper. †Corresponding author: [email protected] | Join the Open Physics Collaboration 1 2. A black hole is formed when the density of matter exceeds the amount supported by spacetime. 3. It is believed that at or near the event horizon, there are high-energy quanta, known as the black hole firewall [3].
    [Show full text]
  • NIDUS IDEARUM. Scilogs, IV: Vinculum Vinculorum
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Mathematics and Statistics Faculty and Staff Publications Academic Department Resources 2019 NIDUS IDEARUM. Scilogs, IV: vinculum vinculorum Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/math_fsp Part of the Celtic Studies Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, Mathematics Commons, and the Modern Literature Commons Recommended Citation Smarandache, Florentin. "NIDUS IDEARUM. Scilogs, IV: vinculum vinculorum." (2019). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/math_fsp/310 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Department Resources at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics and Statistics Faculty and Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. scilogs, IV nidus idearum vinculum vinculorum Bipolar Neutrosophic OffSet Refined Neutrosophic Hypergraph Neutrosophic Triplet Structures Hyperspherical Neutrosophic Numbers Neutrosophic Probability Distributions Refined Neutrosophic Sentiment Classes of Neutrosophic Operators n-Valued Refined Neutrosophic Notions Theory of Possibility, Indeterminacy, and Impossibility Theory of Neutrosophic Evolution Neutrosophic World Florentin Smarandache NIDUS IDEARUM. Scilogs, IV: vinculum vinculorum Brussels, 2019 Exchanging ideas with Mohamed Abdel-Basset, Akeem Adesina A. Agboola, Mumtaz Ali, Saima Anis, Octavian Blaga, Arsham Borumand Saeid, Said Broumi, Stephen Buggie, Victor Chang, Vic Christianto, Mihaela Colhon, Cuờng Bùi Công, Aurel Conțu, S. Crothers, Otene Echewofun, Hoda Esmail, Hojjat Farahani, Erick Gonzalez, Muhammad Gulistan, Yanhui Guo, Mohammad Hamidi, Kul Hur, Tèmítópé Gbóláhàn Jaíyéolá, Young Bae Jun, Mustapha Kachchouh, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Shadows from the Asymmetric Thin-Shell Wormhole
    Physics Letters B 811 (2020) 135930 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Novel shadows from the asymmetric thin-shell wormhole ∗ Xiaobao Wang a, Peng-Cheng Li b,c, Cheng-Yong Zhang d, Minyong Guo b, a School of Applied Science, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, PR China b Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, PR China c Department of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, PR China d Department of Physics and Siyuan Laboratory, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, PR China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: For dark compact objects such as black holes or wormholes, the shadow size has long been thought to Received 29 September 2020 be determined by the unstable photon sphere (region). However, by considering the asymmetric thin- Accepted 2 November 2020 shell wormhole (ATSW) model, we find that the impact parameter of the null geodesics is discontinuous Available online 6 November 2020 through the wormhole in general and hence we identify novel shadows whose sizes are dependent of Editor: N. Lambert the photon sphere in the other side of the spacetime. The novel shadows appear in three cases: (A2) The observer’s spacetime contains a photon sphere and the mass parameter is smaller than that of the opposite side; (B1, B2) there’ s no photon sphere no matter which mass parameter is bigger.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacetime Warps and the Quantum World: Speculations About the Future∗
    Spacetime Warps and the Quantum World: Speculations about the Future∗ Kip S. Thorne I’ve just been through an overwhelming birthday celebration. There are two dangers in such celebrations, my friend Jim Hartle tells me. The first is that your friends will embarrass you by exaggerating your achieve- ments. The second is that they won’t exaggerate. Fortunately, my friends exaggerated. To the extent that there are kernels of truth in their exaggerations, many of those kernels were planted by John Wheeler. John was my mentor in writing, mentoring, and research. He began as my Ph.D. thesis advisor at Princeton University nearly forty years ago and then became a close friend, a collaborator in writing two books, and a lifelong inspiration. My sixtieth birthday celebration reminds me so much of our celebration of Johnnie’s sixtieth, thirty years ago. As I look back on my four decades of life in physics, I’m struck by the enormous changes in our under- standing of the Universe. What further discoveries will the next four decades bring? Today I will speculate on some of the big discoveries in those fields of physics in which I’ve been working. My predictions may look silly in hindsight, 40 years hence. But I’ve never minded looking silly, and predictions can stimulate research. Imagine hordes of youths setting out to prove me wrong! I’ll begin by reminding you about the foundations for the fields in which I have been working. I work, in part, on the theory of general relativity. Relativity was the first twentieth-century revolution in our understanding of the laws that govern the universe, the laws of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Traversable Wormholes in Five-Dimensional Lovelock Theory
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 100, 044011 (2019) Traversable wormholes in five-dimensional Lovelock theory Gaston Giribet, Emilio Rubín de Celis, and Claudio Simeone Physics Department, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA-CONICET Ciudad Universitaria, pabellón 1, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 11 June 2019; published 8 August 2019) In general relativity, traversable wormholes are possible provided they do not represent shortcuts in the spacetime. Einstein equations, together with the achronal averaged null energy condition, demand to take longer for an observer to go through the wormhole than through the ambient space. This forbids wormholes from connecting two distant regions in the space. The situation is different when higher-curvature corrections are considered. Here, we construct a traversable wormhole solution connecting two asymptotically flat regions, otherwise disconnected. This geometry is an electrovacuum solution to the Lovelock theory of gravity coupled to an Abelian gauge field. The electric flux suffices to support the wormhole throat and to stabilize the solution. In fact, we show that, in contrast to other wormhole solutions previously found in this theory, the one constructed here turns out to be stable under scalar perturbations. We also consider wormholes in anti–de Sitter (AdS). We present a protection argument showing that, while stable traversable wormholes connecting two asymptotically locally AdS5 spaces do exist in the higher-curvature theory, the region of the parameter space where such solutions are admitted lies outside the causality bounds coming from AdS=CFT. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044011 I. INTRODUCTION describes a pair of extremal magnetically charged black holes connected by a long throat, in such a way that it takes Wormholes are one of the most fascinating solutions of longer for an observer to go through the wormhole than gravitational field equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1108.3003V2 [Gr-Qc]
    Wormholes in Dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory Panagiota Kanti Division of Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, Ioannina GR-45110, Greece Burkhard Kleihaus, Jutta Kunz Institut f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany (Dated: March 15, 2012) We construct traversable wormholes in dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory in four spacetime dimensions, without needing any form of exotic matter. We determine their domain of existence, and show that these wormholes satisfy a generalized Smarr relation. We demonstrate linear stability with respect to radial perturbations for a subset of these wormholes. PACS numbers: 04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.50.-h Introduction.– When the first wormhole, the term, the Gauss-Bonnet (GB) term, and a scalar field “Einstein-Rosen bridge”, was discovered in 1935 [1] (the dilaton) coupling exponentially to the GB term, as a feature of Schwarzschild geometry, it was con- so that the latter has a nontrivial contribution to the sidered a mere mathematical curiosity of the theory. four-dimensional field equations. In the 1950s, Wheeler showed [2] that a wormhole Here we investigate the existence of wormhole solu- can connect not only two different universes but also tions in the context of the DEGB theory. No phantom two distant regions of our own Universe. However, the scalar fields or other exotic forms of matter are intro- dream of interstellar travel shortcuts was shattered by duced. Instead, we rely solely on the existence of the the following findings: (i) the Schwarzschild wormhole higher-curvature GB term that follows naturally from is dynamic - its “throat” expands to a maximum ra- the compactification of the ten-dimensional heterotic dius and then contracts again to zero circumference so superstring theory down to four dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Wormholes in the Background of an Exponential F (R) Gravity
    universe Article Stable Wormholes in the Background of an Exponential f (R) Gravity Ghulam Mustafa 1, Ibrar Hussain 2,* and M. Farasat Shamir 3 1 Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; [email protected] 2 School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan 3 National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Lahore Campus, Punjab 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 January 2020; Accepted: 3 March 2020; Published: 26 March 2020 Abstract: The current paper is devoted to investigating wormhole solutions with an exponential gravity model in the background of f (R) theory. Spherically symmetric static spacetime geometry is chosen to explore wormhole solutions with anisotropic fluid source. The behavior of the traceless matter is studied by employing a particular equation of state to describe the important properties of the shape-function of the wormhole geometry. Furthermore, the energy conditions and stability analysis are done for two specific shape-functions. It is seen that the energy condition are to be violated for both of the shape-functions chosen here. It is concluded that our results are stable and realistic. Keywords: wormholes; stability; f (R) gravity; energy conditions 1. Introduction The discussion on wormhole geometry is a very hot subject among the investigators of the different modified theories of gravity. The concept of wormhole was first expressed by Flamm [1] in 1916. After 20 years, Einstein and Rosen [2] calculated the wormhole geometry in a specific background. In fact, it was the second attempt to realize the basic structure of wormholes.
    [Show full text]