Report August 2018
Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018
Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd Our ref: 23278601 Client ref:
Report August 2018
Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018
Prepared by: Prepared for:
Steer Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 28-32 Upper Ground 4 Lochside Place London SE1 9PD Edinburgh Park Edinburgh EH12 9DF +44 20 7910 5000 Client ref: www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23278601
Steer has prepared this material for Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
Contents
Executive Summary ...... i Overview ...... i
1 Introduction ...... 1 Background ...... 1 Headline results ...... 1
2 Survey Analysis ...... 1 Where do you work? ...... 1 What is your main method of travel to Edinburgh Park? ...... 2 Alternative modes of travel to work ...... 1 How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall? ...... 1 Participation in City of Edinburgh Council-funded sustainable travel activities ...... 2 Self-reported behaviour change over the last year ...... 3 Employee arrival and departure times ...... 3 Flexible working opportunities ...... 5 Free text comments ...... 6
3 Conclusions and recommendations ...... 9 Progress towards targets ...... 9 Recommended action ...... 11
Figures Figure 2.1: Mode share by employer ...... 2 Figure 2.2: Volume of responses by main mode of travel to Edinburgh Park ...... 3 Figure 2.3: Mode split for postcode districts outsid e City of Edinburgh ...... 1 Figure 2.4: Mode split for postcod e districts in City of Edinburgh ...... 1 Figure 2.5: Use of alternatives to driving alone ...... 1 Figure 2.6: How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall by Main Mode of Travel...... 2 Figure 2.7: Participation in CEC-funded sustainable travel activities ...... 3 Figure 2.8: Self-reported behaviour change ...... 3 Figure 2.9: Employee normal arrival times at Edinburgh Park ...... 4
August 2018 Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
Figure 2.10: Employee normal departure times at Edinburgh Park ...... 5 Figure 2.11: Participation in common flexible working opportunities ...... 5
Tables Table 2.1: Response Rate by organisation ...... 1 Table 2.2: Mode share 2018 ...... 1 Table 2.3: Top 10 postcode districts where staff travel from to Edinburgh Park...... 4 Table 2.4: How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall? ...... 1 Table 3.1: Summary of progress towards targets for 2020 ...... 9 Appendix Table A.1: Historic Mode Share by Employer (2004 – 2018) ...... 14
Appendices
A Historic Mode Share by Employer
August 2018 Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
Executive Summary Overview Edinburgh Park (Management) Limited (EP(M)L) carries out employee travel surveys at Edinburgh Park annually to meet the requirements of City of Edinburgh Council's planning condition. EP(M)L undertook an Edinburgh Park-wide online travel survey between May and July 2018. The survey collected the following information: • Place of work; • Main method of travel to Edinburgh Park; • Alternative modes of travel to work; • Quality of transport connections to Edinburgh Park; • Participation in City of Edinburgh Council sustainable travel initiatives; • Self-reported behaviour change; • Employee start and finish times; and • Availability of and participation in flexible working opportunities. The survey had a response rate of approximately 26% (2,337 respondents), increasing by 61 the number of responses obtained in 2017. The number of organisations taking part in the survey and taking part in the Travel Plan Forum also increased, indicating improved engagement with employers. A summary of the key results is provided in the bullets below: • The survey response rate was approximately 26%, slightly less than that achieved in 2017 but against a revised total staff level of 8,980 across the park; • Overall, single occupancy car use stayed at the same level as in 2017. 54% of staff still travel this way against the travel plan target for 2020 of 48%; • Car sharing (either as a driver or passenger) has increased by 2 percentage points, from 8% in 2017 to 10% in 2018; • Public transport mode share has reduced by 2 percentage points from 29% in 2017 to 27% in 2018%; • Cycling accounts for 4% mode share in 2018, down from 5% in 2017; • Walking mode share has stayed the same as in 2017, with 2% of respondents walking to work as their main mode; • The train is the most popular alternative mode to driving alone, with 27% of those who usually drive alone using the train occasionally; • 71% of respondents indicate transport connections to Edinburgh Park are good or very good overall, the same as in 2017. However, there was an increase of 2 percentage points for those rating connections poor or very poor; • The weekday traffic flow recorded by the barrier to the Southern Access route records an average weekday flow of between 10,000 and 11,000 vehicles (including buses and service vehicles); • Employees from 26 organisations at Edinburgh Park indicated that they had taken part in at least one activity promoting active travel delivered through City of Edinburgh Council initiatives; • Considering travel patterns over the last year, 9% of respondents indicated they had cycled more, 35% indicated they had walked more, 36% indicated they had used public transport more and 31% indicated they had driven less.
August 2018 | i Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
• Over half of respondents (51%) indicated their usual start time is between 8am and 9am, however almost two thirds (61%) of these respondents indicated that they could arrive earlier and just over half (51%), later indicating opportunities for spreading the morning peak. Similar opportunities exist for the evening peak. • 79% of respondents indicated that their employer did provide flexible working options to employees. • The number of organisations taking part in the travel survey increased from 32 organisations in 2017 to 35 in 2018 and attendance at Travel Plan Forum meetings has been good with 31 representatives from 29 organisations attending an event in Spring 2018. The results of this travel survey will continue to inform engagement with employers as part of Travel Plan activities at Edinburgh Park in 2018/19 and beyond. It will also assist in identifying and targeting activities which will support Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd meeting the Travel Plan targets.
August 2018 | ii Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
1 Introduction Background 1.1 Edinburgh Park (Management) Limited (EP(M)L) carries out employee travel surveys at Edinburgh Park annually to meet the requirements of City of Edinburgh Council's planning condition. Employee travel surveys have been conducted since 2003. EP(M)L undertook an Edinburgh Park-wide online travel survey between May and July 2018. 1.2 Each year, the core questions of the staff travel survey remain the same to allow for year on year trend analysis. The format used since 2015 was retained and three additional questions were added this year. 1.3 Over the period between May and July 2018, the travel survey was placed on the Edinburgh Park website and e-mails were sent to contacts within each of the companies at Edinburgh Park to promote the survey. A prize draw for two £50 Gyle Shopping Centre vouchers was also offered to respondents to provide an incentive to respond. Edinburgh Park Travel Plan and Transport Forum 1.4 EP(M)L originally produced its Travel Plan in 2003, which was updated in 2008 and again in 2015. 1.5 The company has taken forward a number of initiatives since the introduction of the Travel Plan including: a bike breakfast; a 'borrow a bike' scheme; a car share scheme; sustainable travel promotion events; and the production of a sustainable transport map. Recently, awareness raising activity has been undertaken using funding secured by City of Edinburgh Council and delivered by a local consultancy team. This has focussed on encouraging walking, cycling and car sharing. 1.6 To assist in the on-going development of transport initiatives, the results of the travel survey are made available to all property owners and occupiers at Edinburgh Park and the results of the survey inform the priorities for Travel Plan initiatives and consequently the best methods of achieving a reduction in the number of single occupancy vehicle trips to Edinburgh Park. 1.7 To help with the implementation of Travel Plan initiatives, EP(M)L has also established a Transport Forum which meets twice a year. The forum is attended by a representative from each company based at Edinburgh Park and assists in the implementation of any of the recommendations contained within the travel survey report. In 2015, this forum was re- invigorated and attendance by representatives of organisations based at Edinburgh Park has continued to be good with the majority of employers represented at forum meetings. Headline results 1.8 A summary of the headline travel survey results is provided below. Detailed analysis is provided in Chapter 2.
August 2018 | 1 Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
Response Rate 1.9 The survey response rate was approximately 26%, slightly lower than that achieved in 2017. Response rates were calculated against a revised estimated total number of staff 8,980, up from 7,562. Main mode • Overall, single occupancy car use has stayed the same compared to last year. 54% of staff still travel this way to Edinburgh Park; • Car sharing (either as a driver or passenger) has increased by 2 percentage points, from 8% in 2017 to 10% in 2018; • Overall public transport mode share has reduced by 2 percentage points from 29% in 2017 to 27% in 2018%; • Cycling accounts for 4% mode share in 2018, down from 5% in 2017; • Walking mode share has stayed the same as in 2017, with 2% of respondents walking to work as their main mode. Alternative modes of travel • Considering use of alternatives to driving alone as a main mode of travel, the train is the most popular alternative mode with 27% of those who usually drive alone using the train occasionally. Transport Links • 71% of respondents indicated transport connections were good or very good overall, the same as in 2017. However, there was an increase of 2 percentage points for those rating connections poor or very poor. Traffic flows • The weekday traffic flow recorded by the barrier to the Southern Access route records an average weekday flows of between 10,000 and 11,000 vehicles (including buses and service vehicles). Participation in City of Edinburgh Council initiatives • Employees from 26 organisations at Edinburgh Park indicated that they had taken part in at least one activity promoting active travel delivered through City of Edinburgh Council initiatives. The most frequent activity was the Dr Bike drop-in session which was participated in by 88 respondents. • Respondents were asked if they had changed the amount they walked, cycled, used public transport or driven over the last year. 9% of respondents indicated they had cycled more, 35% indicated they had walked more, 36% indicated they had used public transport more and 31% indicated they had driven less. Employee arrival and departure times • Survey respondents were asked to indicate when their normal arrival and departure times were at Edinburgh Park as well as the earliest and latest possible times they could arrive and depart taking into account work and personal requirements. Over half of respondents (51%) indicated their usual start time was between 8am and 9am, however almost two thirds (61%) of these respondents indicated that they could arrive earlier, with 52% saying they could arrive between 7am and 8am and a further 9% between 6am and 7am. Many
August 2018 | 2 Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
respondents starting between 8am and 9am could also arrive later with 51% indicating they could arrive between 9am and 10am. • 32% of respondents leave between 4pm and 5pm and 43% of respondents leave between 5pm and 6pm. Considering the earliest departure times for those leaving between 4pm and 5pm, 34% of respondents said they could leave slightly earlier, between 3pm and 4pm. Considering the latest departure times for those leaving between 5pm and 6pm, 26% of respondents indicated they could leave between 6pm and 7pm. Flexible working • Overall, 79% of respondents indicated that their employer did offer flexible working options to employees. Only 12% of respondents indicated that they were not permitted to work from home, 19% indicated that they were not permitted to work a compressed working week and 8% indicated they were not permitted to work on a flexitime arrangement. Other monitoring • The number of organisations taking part in the travel survey increased from 32 organisations in 2017 to 35 in 2018; • Attendance at Travel Plan Forum meetings has been good with 29 organisations (76% of those on the park) represent at the Forum event in spring 2018; • The number of registered car sharers has decreased by 9 members between 2017 and 2018. There are now 99 members; • Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd held five Dr Bike events and two bike marking events over the last year; and • The car share web page attracted less online traffic over the last year with 1,122 views compared to 6,906 in 2017.
August 2018 | 3 Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
2 Survey Analysis Where do you work? Response rate by employer 2.1 Table 2.1 shows the response rate by employer to the travel survey. The average response rate was 26% across Edinburgh Park. 2.2 21 organisations achieved or exceeded the target response rate per employer of 30%. 2.3 A small number of employees (8) responded to the survey but did not indicate which employer they worked for.
Table 2.1: Response Rate by organisation
Company Approx. Responses Response Rate Response Response Rate No. of 2018 20181 2017 2017 Employees Aegon/Kames Capital 2,500 422 17% 414 21%
Agilent/Keysite 125 67 54% 59 49%
Akamai (NEW) 20 11 55% n/a n/a
BT 600 93 16% 138 15%
Business Stream 200 92 46% 55 25%
Busybee Nursery 30 4 13% 1 10%
Cash Generators (NEW) 25 10 40% n/a n/a
CGI 80 28 35% 32 32%
ComputerShare 153 40 26% 22 49%
Coulters (NEW) 13 13 100% n/a n/a
Diageo 212 21 10% 114 63%
DNV GL 12 7 58% 1 5%
Energize Gym 20 4 20% 4 67%
EP Management 3 2 67% 2 67%
Exception 14 12 86% 6 30%
Fujitsu 80 60 75% 25 10%
Galliford Try 65 41 63% 42 28%
1 = achieved/exceeded 30% response
Edinburgh Park Travel Survey 2018 | Report
Go For Finance (NEW) 13 1 8% n/a n/a
HSBC Lochside Avenue 700 165 24% 128 43%
HSBC Securities 400 135 34% 136 34%
JLT 330 157 48% 122 49%
JP Morgan 600 103 17% 38 11%
Leidos 72 23 32% Unknown Unknown
Lloyds Bank 450 176 39% 156 45%
Menzies Distribution 300 112 37% 73 31%
Miller Group 260 33 13% 64 25%
NuCana (NEW) 20 7 35% n/a n/a
Origo 56 48 86% 50 100%
Premier Inn Unknown Unknown Unknown 2 Unknown
Regus 200 17 9% 2 Unknown
RSPB 100 62 62% 74 100%
Sainsburys Bank 1100 283 26% 367 41%
SLR 30 21 70% 17 65%
Version1 39 17 44% 2 8%
Viavi 42 17 40% 15 30%
WSP 116 86 74% 41 43%
Unknown - 8 n/a 4 n/a
Total 8,980 2,375 26% 2,237 30%
What is your main method of travel to Edinburgh Park? Overall Mode Share 2.4 The overall mode split for Edinburgh Park in 2018 is shown in Table 2.2 overleaf. Between 2017 and 2018, mode share for single occupancy car travel has remained the same. The mode share for car sharing (as a driver or passenger) has increased from 8% to 10%. 2.5 Public transport mode share has decreased by 2 percentage points due to a decrease in bus use. 2.6 Overall, the active travel mode share has decreased slightly due to a small (one percentage point) decrease in cycling. Walking mode share stayed the same at 2%. 2.7 Use of other modes remains low at less than 2%.
Table 2.2: Mode share 2018
Main mode Number Percentage Percentage 2018 2018 2017 Car driver alone
Car driver alone total 1,303 54% 54%
Car sharing
Car driver (with passengers) 175 7% 6%
Car passenger 61 3% 2%
Car share total 236 10% 8%
Public transport
Train 247 10% 10%
Bus 165 7% 9%
Tram 248 10% 10%
Public transport total 660 27% 29%
Active travel
Bicycle 104 4% 5%
Foot 49 2% 2%
Active travel total 153 6% 7%
Other methods
Motorcycle 17 1% <1%
Taxi 5 <1% <1%
Other 17 1% <1%
Other total 39 2% <1%
Grand total 2391 100% 100%
Mode Share by Employer 2.8 Figure 2.1 shows mode share by employer and Figure 2.2 shows the volume of respondents indicating use of each mode. 2.9 Mode share varies greatly across employers. Go Finance, Edinburgh Park Management Ltd, and Busybee show the highest proportion of single occupancy car use, however, these organisations individually are very small in terms of staff numbers and thus have little impact overall on car use to Edinburgh Park. 2.10 Two organisations, Aegon/Kames Capital and Sainsburys Bank, generate 385 (30%) of the single occupancy car trips to work. 2.11 Edinburgh Park has a mode share target of 48% overall for car driver alone. Eight organisations achieve this target as can be seen in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Mode share by employer
Key Go For Finance 100% Target EP Management 100% 2020 mode share for BusyBee 100% Car driver DNV GL 86% 14% Alone (48%) Akamai 82% 9% 9%
Miller Group 76% 12% 9% 3%
Galliford Try/Morrison Construction 73% 2% 17% 7%
Fujitsu 72% 7% 12% 7% 2%
Regus 71% 18% 6% 6%
BT 65% 4% 26% 5%
Keysight Technologies 63% 3% 18% 13% 3%
Coulters 62% 38%
CGI 61% 11% 18% 7% 4%
Menzies Distribution 59% 5% 27% 8% 1%
HSBC – Lochside Avenue 59% 8% 27% 5%
NuCana 57% 14% 14% 14%
Diageo 57% 14% 29%
Aegon/Kames Capital 55% 12% 26% 6% 1%
Origo 54% 13% 25% 6% 2%
Sainsburys Bank 54% 10% 29% 5% 2%
HSBC – Securities 54% 7% 27% 8% 4%
Viavi 53% 6% 6% 29% 6%
WSP 52% 8% 29% 9% 1%
Lloyds Bank 52% 17% 26% 3%2%
Leidos 50% 14% 32% 5%
JP Morgan 50% 10% 33% 6% 1%
Cash Generators 50% 20% 20% 10%
Business Stream 46% 13% 37% 2%1%
ComputerShare 45% 8% 43% 5%
JLT 45% 14% 35% 5%1%
SLR 43% 38% 14% 5%
Exception 42% 8% 33% 17%
Version1 35% 18% 35% 12%
Energize Gym 25% 25% 50%
RSPB 24% 8% 45% 23%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Car driver alone Car sharing Public transport Active travel Other
Figure 2.2: Volume of responses by main mode of travel to Edinburgh Park
Aegon/Kames Capital 232 51 108 27 4
Sainsburys Bank 153 29 82 13 6
Lloyds Bank 91 30 46 5
HSBC – Lochside Avenue 98 13 45 9
JLT 69 22 55 72
HSBC – Securities 72 10 36 11
Menzies Distribution 66 5 30 9
JP Morgan 51 10 34 6
BT 60 4 24 50
Business Stream 42 12 34 2
WSP 45 7 25 81
Keysight Technologies 42 12
RSPB 15 5 28 140
Fujitsu 42 474
Origo 26 6123
Galliford Try/Morrison Construction 30 73
ComputerShare 18 3 17
Miller Group 25 4310
CGI 17 352
Leidos 11
Diageo 1236
SLR 9083
Regus 12 1
Viavi 9 5
Version1 63
Coulters 8
Exception 514
Akamai 911
Cash Generators 522
DNV GL 601
NuCana 411
BusyBee 40
Energize Gym 112
EP Management 20
Go For Finance
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Car driver alone Car sahre Public transport Active travel Other
Main Mode of Travel to Work by Postcode Origin 2.12 Respondents travelled to work from 160 different postcode districts with 44% (1,044) of respondents travelling from the top 10 postcode districts. The top 10 postcode districts are shown in Table 2.3 below. Almost a tenth of respondents came from the EH12 postcode area.
Table 2.3: Top 10 postcode districts where staff travel from to Edinburgh Park
Postcode District Number of responses Proportion of total District description received responses received EH12 194 8% Corstorphine
EH11 129 5% Sighthill/Dalry
EH54 128 5% Livingston/Uphall
KY11 113 5% Inverkeithing/Rosyth/North Queensferry/Dalgety Bay EH4 107 4% Clermiston/Barnton/Davidson’s Mains
EH6 76 3% Leith
EH7 71 3% Bonnington/Rastalrig
EH10 69 3% Morningside/Swanton/Buckstone
EH48 69 3% Bathgate/Armadale/Blackridge
Postcode plots by mode 2.13 Main mode of travel to Edinburgh Park was plotted by postcode district. Results can be seen in Figure 2.3 and Figure 2.4 and are described below. Travel by Car and Car Share 2.14 Travel as a car driver alone accounts for less than 50% of the mode share in several postcode districts to the east of Edinburgh Park (Corstorphine and Clermiston/Barnton/Davidson’s Mains) however in most cases, travel by car as a driver alone is the predominant mode, particularly for commuters travelling longer distances. 2.15 Car sharing is particularly popular among employees living in the Livingston/Uphall area as well as Grangemouth and Bo’ness. Travel by Public Transport 2.16 Key locations where public transport is the predominant mode include postcode districts in and around central Edinburgh as well as around Inverkeithing, North Queensferry and Glenrothes. Travel by Active Modes
2.17 Travel on foot or by bike accounts for the largest mode share at postcode districts closest to Edinburgh Park (Corstorphine and Clermiston/Barnton/Davidson’s Mains) as well as Ratho and Newbridge.
Figure 2.3: Mode split for postcode districts outside City of Edinburgh
Figure 2.3: Mode split for postcode districts outsid e City of Edinburgh
Figure 2.4: Mode split for postcode districts in City of Edinburgh
Figure 2.4: Mode split for postcod e districts in City of Edinburgh
Alternative modes of travel to work 2.18 Respondents were asked which other methods of travel they used if their main method was unavailable. 1,303 respondents usually drive alone. Figure 2.5 summarises the proportion of these who usually drive alone but occasionally use other methods. It can be seen that the train is the most popular alternative mode with 27% of those who usually drive alone using the train occasionally.
Figure 2.5: Use of alternatives to driving alone
30% 27% 25%
20% 17% 16% 15% 14% 9% 9% 10% 7%
5% 3% 1% 1%
0%
Bus
Taxi
Foot
Train
Tram
Bicycle
Motorcycle
passengers)
Car passenger Car Car driver (with driver Car I work from home work I How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall? 2.19 Respondents were asked to rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall. Results can be seen in Table 2.4 which compares 2018 results with those obtained in 2017. 2.20 71% of respondents indicated transport connections were good or very good overall, the same as in 2017. 10% indicated they believed transport connections to be poor or very poor, an increase of 2 percentage points from 2017. 3% of respondents did not know, the same as in 2017. These results indicate slightly less positive perceptions in relation to transport connections to Edinburgh Park compared to last year.
Table 2.4: How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall?
Response 2018 2017
Very Good 28% 29%
Good 43% 42%
Average 16% 18%
Poor 6% 5%
Very Poor 4% 3%
Don’t know 3% 3%
Grand Total 100% 100%
2.21 Figure 2.6 shows how these ratings vary by main method of travel used.
Figure 2.6: How would you rate transport connections to Edinburgh Park overall by Main Mode of Travel
Taxi 20% 20% 40% 20%
Motorcycle 24% 41% 6% 12% 12% 6%
Foot 41% 37% 16% 6%
Bicycle 32% 45% 13% 5% 2%
Tram 53% 41% 4%
Train 30% 47% 17% 3%
Bus 31% 47% 15% 5%
Car passenger 30% 51% 10% 7% 3%
Car driver (with passengers) 18% 47% 17% 6% 6% 5%
Car driver alone 23% 42% 19% 7% 4% 5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very Good Good Average Poor Very Poor Don’t know
2.22 As in 2017, the small number of respondents travelling by taxi are the least satisfied with transport connections to Edinburgh Park. 40% indicated connections are poor. Those travelling by tram are the most satisfied with 94% indicating connections are good or very good. Participation in City of Edinburgh Council-funded sustainable travel activities 2.23 Respondents were asked if they had taken part in any City of Edinburgh Council funded activities at Edinburgh Park as summarised in Figure 2.7. Employees from 26 organisations at Edinburgh Park indicated that they had taken part in at least one activity. The most frequent activity participated in was the Dr Bike drop-in session with 88 respondents.
Figure 2.7: Participation in CEC-funded sustainable travel activities
100 88 90 80 70 55 60 53 50 40 40 31 30 20 20 10
0
2017)
leaflets
Dr Bike Dr drop-in
organisation
Planning(MyPTP)
Personalised Travel Personalised
maintenancesession
Challenge (September Challenge
On Foot by Bike Maps / Bike Foot On by
Edinburgh Active Travel Edinburgh
Edinburgh Commuter Edinburgh Travel roadshow at your at roadshow Travel Challenge (February 2018) Challenge Self-reported behaviour change over the last year 2.24 Respondents were asked if they felt they had changed how often they walked, cycled, used public transport and/or drove over the last year. Results are summarised in Figure 2.8.
Figure 2.8: Self-reported behaviour change
100% 2% 10% 8% 8% 90% 80% 70% 60% 55% 56% 61% 50% 89% 40% 30% 20% 35% 36% 31% 10% 9% 0% Walked more Cycled more Used public transport Driven less more
Yes No Maybe/Don’t know
2.25 9% of respondents indicated they had cycled more, 35% indicated they had walked more, 36% indicated they had used public transport more and 31% indicated they had driven less. Employee arrival and departure times 2.26 Congestion on the road and public transport network around Edinburgh Park is particularly acute during the morning and evening peaks. In 2018, survey respondents were asked to indicate when their normal arrival and departure times were to the park, and when their earliest and latest practical arrival and departure times could be. Considering these results shows any opportunity for spreading the morning or evening peak and thus reducing pressure on the transport network at peak periods. Results are summarised in the following section.
Employee arrival times 2.27 Employees were asked to indicate their normal, earliest and latest start times, taking into account their own work and personal commitments. The results are shown in Figure 2.9.
Figure 2.9: Employee normal arrival times at Edinburgh Park
60% 51% 50%
40% 28% 30%
20% 12% 10% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2%
0%
Varies
07:00-08:00 00:00-06:00 06:00-07:00 08:00-09:00 09:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00
Start later than12:00 Startlater 2.28 Over half of respondents (51%) indicated their usual start time is between 8am and 9am. 2.29 Considering responses from only those indicating a usual arrival time of between 8am and 9am, 61% of respondents indicated that they could arrive earlier, with 52% saying they could arrive between 7am and 8am and a further 9% between 6am and 7am. 2.30 Many respondents starting between 8am and 9am could also arrive later with 51% indicating they could arrive between 9am and 10am. Employee departure times 2.31 Employees were also asked to indicate the latest possible departure times from Edinburgh Park. Results are summarised in Figure 2.10. The key departure period is slightly more spread, over a two-hour period between 4pm and 6pm. 32% of respondents leave between 4pm and 5pm and 43% of respondents leave between 5pm and 6pm. 2.32 Considering the earliest departure times for those leaving between 4pm and 5pm, 34% of respondents said they could leave slightly earlier, between 3pm and 4pm. 2.33 Considering the latest departure times for those leaving between 5pm and 6pm, 26% of respondents indicated they could leave between 6pm and 7pm.
Figure 2.10: Employee normal departure times at Edinburgh Park
50% 43% 45% 40% 35% 32% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 9% 10% 5% 1% 2% 1% 0% 2%
0%
Varies
17:00-18:00 14:00-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 18:00-19:00 19:00-20:00 Depart later Depart 20:00 than Leave earlier than 14:00 than Leaveearlier Flexible working opportunities 2.34 Respondents were asked if their employer provided flexible working options for employees such as working from home, compressed working week or flexible start and finish times. Overall, 79% of respondents indicated ‘yes’. 2.35 Only 12% of respondents indicated that they were not permitted to work from home, 19% indicated that they were not permitted to work a compressed working week and 8% indicated they were not permitted to work on a flexitime arrangement.
Figure 2.11: Participation in common flexible working opportunities
100% 8% 90% 12% 19% 80% 17% 16% 70% 60% 34% 50% 45% 64% 40% 30% Not Permitted 20% 41% 10% 26% 7% Never 10% 0% Occasionally
Regularly
times
Working from home Working Compressed working week working Compressed Flexitime/Flexible start-finish Flexitime/Flexible
Free text comments 2.36 The survey allowed respondents to provide free text comments on travel to work at Edinburgh Park. 812 comments were provided by survey respondents with following key themes: Walking 2.37 Comments relating to walking included: • Concerns around conflict between pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles on site. Concern was raised about the speed of cyclists using shared paths and about drivers exceeding 20mph speed limits within the Park. It was suggested that a pedestrian crossing on the north side of Edinburgh Park Station would be useful; • Suggestions that pedestrian links could be improved. Specific locations mentioned were: • the gap in the footway on Lochside Avenue; • on the left side of the road (towards Edinburgh Park Station) between Aegon and Edinburgh Park; • routes at the north west of the park (near IBIS); and • existing paths around 4/5 Lochside View. • It was also suggested that paths could be more accessible for those with poor mobility or those with push chairs and that that signage could be improved for visitors to the Park; • Some off-site lighting improvements were suggested, such as from Hermiston under the bypass to Edinburgh Park and the canal towpath. Cycling 2.38 Comments relating to cycling included: • Concern over bike theft at Edinburgh Park. It was suggested that CCTV coverage could be improved and location of employee cycle parking could be moved to more visible, secure locations; • Suggestion that Edinburgh Park lobby local authorities to improve cycle connectivity to a wider range of locations. Areas suggested for route improvements included: • through Gogar Roundabout; • South Gyle Access Road (along tram bridge) and Canal/Wester Hailes; and • along A8 (Newbridge to Gogar). • Some new routes received praise including the Murrayfield Path and the underpass to Edinburgh Gateway. • The 20mph limit was seen a positive, and adding to a feeling of safety, though there were some requests for more speedbumps. • The barrier controlled entry and potholes were raised as barriers for cyclists. • Suggestions that e-bikes should be promoted and bike pumps could be provided around the site; • Lack of space for bikes on trains and lack of shower and locker facilities within some employers were also raised as barriers to cycling to Edinburgh Park.
Buses 2.39 Comments relating to bus predominantly related to requests for direct services from home locations and frustrations with long journey times. A desire for better links from specific locations were raised including from: • Locations in West Lothian (such as areas around Livingston South station); • Locations in Fife (such as Dunfermline, Dalgetty Bay and Rosyth); • Herriot Watt P&R; • Penicuick and other areas of Midlothian; • Morningside; • South Queensferry; • Barnton. 2.40 An orbital service around the by-pass was also suggested as well as the introduction of contactless payment options for tickets. Shuttle Buses 2.41 Comments on the shuttle bus focussed on praising the service, including the drivers. 2.42 Some respondents indicated that they needed more information on the service and that its hours of operation and route should be extended to include car parks. One respondent felt the quality of the service had deteriorated. Tram 2.43 Comments included: • A range of positive comments relating to the tram from those who had previously had a negative view of the tram project during its construction phase; • Concerns that tram services are full at peak times making journeys uncomfortable. A higher frequency at peak times would be desirable; • A desire for extensions of the tram service to Leith and into West Lothian; • Improved footways around some tram stops such as Edinburgh Park Central; and • A request for more air conditioning on the trams. Train 2.44 Comments included: • Suggestions that more services should stop at Edinburgh Gateway station as it has better facilities than South Gyle; • Requests for express services between Edinburgh and Glasgow stopping at Edinburgh Park; • Concerns around unreliability and incidences of trains scheduled to stop at Edinburgh Park but skipping the station; • Issues around overcrowding on peak services; • Constraints around use of trains due to full car parks at local stations; • Request for improved peak time services to Dalgety Bay from Edinburgh Gateway; and • A perception that train travel is costly in comparison to driving.
Car Parking 2.45 Comments included: • Requests for additional free car parking; • A suggestion that car parking is better managed across the Edinburgh Park site, to balance out areas where there is high demand and spare capacity; • Suggestions for introducing priority parking spaces for car sharers; and • A perception that the cost of parking (£4/day) is expensive and parking provision is poor quality. Roads, barrier control and congestion 2.46 Comments included: • Concerns regarding peak time congestion at Gogar, Hermiston Gate and Gyle roundabouts. Several comments indicated congestion was getting worse; • Concerns around conflict between vehicles and trams at Gogar Roundabout; • Concerns around driver behaviour within Edinburgh Park such as lane discipline and traffic speed; • Praise for the availability of the barrier controlled entrance but concern around tailgating by drives without a barrier access tag; and • Suggestion that car sharing should be promoted.
3 Conclusions and recommendations
Progress towards targets 3.1 The progress towards meeting the objectives for the Travel Plan and progressing towards targets set for 2020 are summarised in Table 3.1. 3.2 Main mode of travel to Edinburgh Park 3.3 Mode shares at Edinburgh Park in 2018 are similar to those recorded in 2017 and the baseline collected in 2015. Mode share for car driver alone remains at 54% as in 2017 and there were small changes to other modes, with a 2-percentage point increase in car sharing, but associated reductions in bus and cycling. 3.4 The results indicate that for the 2020 targets to be achieved, further work will be required to encourage behaviour change from car driving (alone) to sustainable alternatives.
Table 3.1: Summary of progress towards targets for 2020
Objectives Performance Indicator Baseline 2018 Target (2020) (2015) OB1: To meet the mode Proportion of Car driver (alone) 56% 54% 48% share targets agreed within survey Car driver (with 7% 7% 8% the Travel Plan respondents that passenger) state their main2 mode of travel Car passenger 3% 3% 4% to Edinburgh Bus 8% 7% 9% Park is by: Tram 7% 10% 9% Rail 10% 10% 11% Walk 3% 2% 4% Cycle 4% 4% 6% Motorcycle 1% 1% 1% Taxi 0% <1% 0% OB2: To meet the average Average weekday traffic flow (excluding n/a 10,000- 20,000 weekday traffic flow targets public transport and service vehicles) on 11,0004 for Edinburgh Park access and egress routes3 shall not exceed:
2 Main mode is the method of travel used to travel the longest distance during a normal commuting day. 3 Redheughs Avenue, the entrance from South Gyle Broadway and Southern access. 4 Weekly barrier usage (including buses and service vehicles).
OB3: To work in cooperation To achieve an Average response 26% 26%5 30% with employers based on improved rate to annual travel Edinburgh Park to influence engagement survey travel behaviour towards with employers Number of 27 (90%)6 35 (92%)7 95% of sustainable modes of travel at Edinburgh organisations organisations Park participating in annual travel survey Average attendance 17 (57%) 29 (76%) Average of 60% at Travel Plan Forum of organisations meetings at each meeting Number of Forum 1 2 2 Meetings per year Number of registered 75 99 350 (5% of car share members employees) Number of site-wide 1 7 4 events undertaken per annum Web Map 2,903 7,667 Increase hits Rail 638 929 Increase (annual) Travel & 2,336 1,122 Increase C/share
Weekday traffic flows 3.5 Weekday traffic flows on the Southern Access are recorded via sonar radar traffic counter located near the access barrier. 10,000 to 11,000 vehicles (including buses and service vehicles) use this access on an average weekday. Working in cooperation with employers 3.6 A number of positive results have been achieved in 2018 in terms of working in cooperation with employers. This includes: • The average survey response rate of 26% is slightly lower than the target of 30% however, 21 organisations achieved or exceeded the response rate target; and • Attendance at Travel Plan Forum meetings has continued to be good with 29 organisations located on Edinburgh Park present at the last meeting. 3.7 Key areas where targets are not being met include: • Car Driver (Alone) mode share: Mode share for travel as a car driver alone is above the target for 2020 and no reduction has been achieved over the last year. Reductions of 3 percentage points per annum will be required to achieve the target of 48%. Based on progress over previous years, this will be a challenging target to achieve unless there is a step-change in activity to influence commuter travel choices. • Switch to sustainable modes: Though mode share for train and tram was maintained, there was no increase. Bus and cycle mode share both declined slightly. In order to
5 Total staff in 2018 estimated at 8,980. 6 30 organisations invited to participate in the travel survey in 2016. 7 38 organisations invited to participate in the travel survey in 2018.
support a reduced mode share for car driver alone more work will be required to encourage the use of sustainable modes. • Car sharing: Though mode share indicates an increase in car sharing, members of Edinburgh Park's car share website are below target. Recommended action Provide improved feedback on improvements around Edinburgh Park • Survey respondents indicated frustration that they do not see any action taken as a result of the annual survey. Better promotion of any improvements implemented by City of Edinburgh Council to improve traffic flow, or the cycle network or small scale onsite improvements delivered by Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd, would be valuable to show progress is being made. Implement small scale, targeted on-site improvements • The Travel Survey identified a range of locations where on-site (often small scale) improvements could be beneficial. These include • Improving pathways at the following locations: • where there is a gap in the footway on Lochside Avenue; • on the left side of the road (towards Edinburgh Park Station) between Aegon and Edinburgh Park; • routes at the north west of the park (near IBIS); • existing paths around 4/5 Lochside View; and • pedestrian desire lines at Edinburgh Park Central tram stop; • Introducing a pedestrian crossing between Edinburgh Park station and Premier Inn. Engage with Scotrail regarding improved service provision • There is opportunity for the Park to engage with Scotrail to discuss reliability issues relating to scheduled services missing Edinburgh Park during times of disruption and potential for improved service provision at Edinburgh Gateway. Focus on car share promotion and incentivisation • Though mode share for car sharing increased at Edinburgh Park in 2018, car share membership levels and visits to the car share web pages fell. A number of comments also indicated a lack of support for car sharing at Edinburgh Park and a desire for this support. • Car sharing is already a popular method of travel from some areas (West Lothian and Fife). Parking pressures on site also provide an opportunity to incentivise car sharing through the provision of priority parking spaces. • Sestrans has indicated a desire to promote car sharing further at Edinburgh Park which could further encourage staff to take up car share arrangements. Additional awareness raising activities 3.8 City of Edinburgh Council has undertaken a programme of activities with employers at Edinburgh Park. Should future funding become available, messaging should be tailored to some of the issues identified on the Park including: • improving driver and cyclist behaviour;
• provision of clear information on the local cycle network and promoting new cycle routes which have been developed; • promoting car sharing and the support available to find a car share partner, particularly from staff living in popular postcode areas for Edinburgh Park employees (as set out in Table 2.3); and • Given the congestion challenges at peak time at Edinburgh Park which are experienced by car drivers and public transport users, engaging with employers to explore opportunities to promote and encourage flexible working arrangements for employees to reduce pressure on the road network at peak time. Targeted working with specific employers 3.9 As can be seen from Figure 2.2 the greatest volume of single occupancy car driver trips comes from the largest employers (even though some smaller organisations have a higher mode share for single occupancy car). 3.10 In this respect, a focus on encouraging those top trip generators (Aegon/Kames Capital, BT, Sainsburys Bank, HSBC) to increase their sustainable travel mode share is recommended. 3.11 Further detailed analysis of survey results by employer may identify specific opportunities to change mode share. Explore opportunities for providing Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure 3.12 Introducing charging infrastructure for vehicles and bicycles would ensure Edinburgh Park can cater for these increasingly popular transport options, although use of these would need to be managed carefully.
Appendices
A Historic Mode Share by Employer
Appendix Table A.1: Historic Mode Share by Employer (2004 – 2018)
Employer Number of
responses
Car Share Car Bus Train Tram Motorcycle Cycled Walk Aegon/Kames Capital 18 55% 12% 9% 7% 9% 0% 5% 1% 422
Aegon/Kames Capital 17 48% 14% 15% 8% 9% 0% 3% 3% 414
Aegon/Kames Capital 16 56% 13% 9% 11% 5% 0% 2% 3% 29
Aegon/Kames Capital 15 57% 11% 9% 11% 4% 1% 3% 4% 528
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 14 54% 14% 13% 10% 1% 3% 4% 353
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 12 48% 13% 13% 16% 1% 6% 3% 231
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 11 49% 10% 20% 15% 0% 30% 3% 316
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 10 52% 10% 21% 11% 0% 4% 2% 692
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 09 55% 14% 18% 10% 0% 3% 1% 270
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 08 52% 10% 20% 12% 1% 5% 1% 601
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 07 72% 8% 14% 8% 1% 2% 1% 366
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 06 66% 7% 13% 9% 0% 1% 2% 655
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 05 66% 10% 13% 7% 1% 2% 2% 568
Aegon/Scottish Equitable 04 59% 10% 17% 3% 4% 2% 4% 106
Agilent/Keysite 18 63% 3% 3% 13% 1% 3% 12% 1% 67
Agilent/Keysite 17 59% 3% 3% 15% 9% 3% 14% 2% 59
Agilent 16 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 1
Agilent 15 59% 0% 0% 12% 0% 6% 21% 3% 34
Agilent 14 48% 10% 5% 3% 3% 33% 0% 40
Agilent 12 53% 3% 0% 13% 10% 17% 3% 30
Agilent 11 61% 1% 7% 12% 4% 12% 3% 70
Agilent 10 67% 3% 4% 10% 3% 12% 1% 69
Akami 18 82% 9% 0% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 11
British Telecom 18 65% 4% 10% 13% 3% 0% 4% 1% 93
British Telecom 17 66% 8% 7% 7% 4% 1% 7% 1% 138
British Telecom 16 69% 8% 4% 5% 4% 1% 6% 1% 161
British Telecom 15 65% 8% 7% 5% 7% 1% 5% 1% 166
BT Scotland 14 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
BT 12 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
BT 11 66% 0% 10% 6% 1% 7% 3% 97
BT 10 63% 6% 13% 8% 2% 4% 4% 166
BT 09 61% 7% 10% 7% 1% 10% 2% 96
BT 08 63% 5% 16% 7% 2% 7% 2% 336
BT 07 53% 13% 23% 7% 0% 2% 1% 88
BT 06 70% 7% 13% 4% 1% 2% 2% 407
BT 05 77% 6% 6% 3% 2% 2% 2% 293
BT 04 80% 4% 9% 1% 0% 2% 2% 201
Business Steam 18 46% 13% 10% 16% 10% 0% 1% 1% 91
Business Steam 17 68% 9% 6% 6% 11% 0% 0% 0% 55
Business Steam 16 62% 14% 8% 4% 7% 1% 2% 1 180
Business Steam 15 61% 12% 12% 6% 6% 0% 2% 1% 84
Business Stream 14 58% 9% 22% 1% 0% 1% 7% 74
Business Stream 12 47% 16% 21% 5% 11% 0% 0% 19
Business Stream 11 57% 13% 26% 2% 0% 2% 0% 47
Busy Bees Nursery 18 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4
Busy Bees Nursery 17 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Busy Bees Nursery 16 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
Careshare Nursery 15 25% 50% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5
Careshare Nursery 14 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 5
Careshare 12 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
Careshare 11 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
Cash Generators 18 50% 20% 0% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0% 10
CGI 18 61% 11% 11% 7% 0% 4% 7% 0% 28
CGI 17 56% 3% 9% 16% 6% 3% 6% 0% 32
CGI 16 56% 5% 12% 17% 1% 1% 6% 1% 81
ComputerShare 18 45% 8% 8% 13% 23% 0% 5% 0% 40
ComputerShare 17 59% 14% 14% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 22
ComputerShare 16 50% 0% 14% 0% 14% 0% 21% 0% 45
ComputerShare 15 52% 6% 21% 0% 6% 0% 15% 0% 33
ComputerShare 14 67% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9
Steria/CompuShare 12 50% 0% 0% 25% 0% 25% 0% 4
Steria/CompuShare 11 61% 7% 18% 7% 0% 7% 0% 28
Xansa/ComputerShare 10 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Xansa/ComputerShare 08 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Xansa/ComputerShare 07 75% 13% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10
Xansa/ComputerShare 06 18% 6% 65% 6% 0% 0% 6% 17
Xansa 05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
Coulters 18 62% 0% 8% 8% 23% 0% 0% 0% 13
Diageo Scotland 18 57% 14% 0% 24% 5% 0% 0% 0% 21
Diageo Scotland 17 65% 9% 5% 9% 9% 0% 3% 1% 114
Diageo Scotland 16 68% 8% 3% 8% 12% 0% 1% 0% 133
Diageo Scotland 15 63% 9% 4% 9% 8% 0% 4% 3% 75
Diageo Scotland 14 74% 7% 7% 6% 0% 2% 5% 108
Diageo 12 66% 10% 10% 10% 0% 0% 3% 29
Diageo 11 69% 0% 9% 9% 0% 3% 0% 90
Diageo 10 67% 3% 9% 13% 0% 4% 3% 67
Diageo 08 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 2
Diageo 07 58% 12% 17% 8% 1% 4% 0% 84
Diageo 06 56% 8% 18% 9% 0% 5% 1% 94
Diageo 05 77% 6% 5% 8% 1% 1% 1% 100
Diageo 04 79% 5% 10% 4% 0% 1% 1% 118
DNV GL 86% 0% 0% 14%% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7
DNV GL 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Energise Gym 18 25% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4
Energise Gym 17 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4
Energie Fitness & Spa 16 67% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6
Energie Fitness & Spa 15 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 18 Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 17 Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 16 Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 15 Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 67% 17% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6 14
Exception 18 42% 8% 0% 25% 8% 8% 0% 0% 12
Exception 17 67% 0% 17% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6
Exception 16 69% 0% 8% 15% 0% 0% 0% 8% 13
Fujitsu 18 72% 7% 0% 5% 7% 2% 5% 2% 58
Fujitsu 17 60% 20% 4% 4% 4% 0% 4% 4% 25
Fujitsu 16 60% 17% 0% 2% 16% 0% 2% 2% 45
Fujitsu 15 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
Fujitsu/Interactive University 14 71% 18% 6% 6% 0% 0% 0% 17
Fujitsu/Interactive University 12 60% 10% 10% 20% 0% 0% 0% 10
Fujitsu/Interactive University 11 60% 20% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 5
Fujitsu/Interactive University 10 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -
Fujitsu/Interactive University 09 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3
Fujitsu/Interactive University 08 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 1
Fujitsu/Interactive University 07 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -
Fujitsu/Interactive University 06 Unknown
Fujitsu 05 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -
Fujitsu 04 89% 6% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18
Galliford Try/Morrison Construction 73% 2% 0% 2% 15% 0% 0% 7% 41 18 Galliford Try/Morrison Construction 68% 7% 0% 5% 15% 0% 2% 2% 42 17 Galliford Try 16 64% 13% 0% 10% 10% 0% 3% 0% 39
Galliford Try 15 69% 0% 10% 7% 7% 0% 10% 3% 29
Go For Finance 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
HSBC Lochside Avenue 18 59% 8% 4% 13% 10% 0% 2% 4% 165
HSBC Lochside Avenue 17 55% 5% 8% 8% 16% 1% 5% 2% 128
HSBC Securities 17 54% 7% 2% 13% 12% 1% 4% 4% 134
HSBC Securities 17 59% 6% 7% 12% 9% 1% 3% 4% 136
Ibis Budget Hotel 18 No Response
Ibis Budget Hotel 17 No Response
Ibis Budget Hotel 16 No Response
Ibis Budget Hotel 15 50% 0% 17% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 6
JLT 18 45% 14% 10% 11% 15% 0% 3% 2% 155
JLT 17 48% 8% 16% 10% 13% 0% 2% 2% 122
JLT 16 46% 10% 9% 12% 13% 0% 0% 5% 78
JLT 15 45% 10% 12% 14% 9% 1% 5% 4% 79
JLT 14 49% 21% 17% 8% 0% 4% 3% 78
J P Morgan 18 50% 10% 4% 10% 20% 1% 3% 3% 102
J P Morgan 17 55% 6% 3% 16% 16% 0% 0% 5% 38
J P Morgan 16 50% 11% 11% 8% 14% 0% 6% 0% 36
J P Morgan 15 64% 9% 5% 8% 10% 1% 2% 2% 122
J P Morgan 14 60% 7% 21% 9% 2% 2% 0% 58
J P Morgan 12 70% 0% 11% 17% 0% 2% 0% 46
J P Morgan 11 40% 5% 20% 30% 0% 0% 5% 20
J P Morgan 10 42% 4% 33% 21% 0% 0% 0% 24
J P Morgan 09 52% 9% 19% 13% 2% 1% 5% 85
J P Morgan 08 41% 8% 27% 16% 2% 5% 2% 64
J P Morgan 07 57% 7% 21% 7% 0% 0% 7% 14
J P Morgan 06 53% 9% 20% 9% 70% 3% 3% 141
J P Morgan 05 43% 4% 41% 7% 2% 0% 2% 54
J P Morgan 04 60% 5% 29% 2% 0% 2% 2% 57
Leidos 18 50% 14% 0% 14% 18% 0% 0% 5% 22
Leidos 17 No response
Lloyds Bank 18 52% 17% 7% 9% 10% 1% 1% 2% 176
Menzies Distribution 18 59% 5% 11% 3% 14% 1% 4% 5% 111
Menzies Distribution 17 62% 4% 10% 7% 14% 1% 0% 3% 73
Menzies Distribution 16 58% 16% 9% 3% 9% 0% 2% 3% 109
Menzies Distribution 15 48% 17% 12% 2% 12% 0% 3% 3% 89
John Menzies PLC 14 53% 24% 10% 5% 1% 3% 4% 148
Menzies Distribution 12 53% 14% 24% 2% 0% 4% 4% 51
Menzies Distribution 11 62% 6% 19% 6% 0% 3% 4% 68
Menzies Distribution 10 63% 11% 20% 6% 0% 0% 0% 64
Menzies Distribution 09 69% 4% 19% 6% 0% 3% 0% 70
Menzies Distribution 08 60% 10% 18% 6% 0% 2% 1% 94
Menzies Distribution 07 53% 4% 6% 18% 1% 0% 4% 77
Menzies Distribution 06 76% 7% 9% 5% 1% 2% 1% 106
Menzies Distribution 05 70% 12% 11% 6% 0% 2% 0% 90
Menzies Distribution 04 68% 15% 12% 2% 0% 1% 2% 112
Miller Group 18 76% 12% 0% 6% 3% 0% 3% 0% 33
Miller Group 17 70% 8% 0% 8% 5% 2% 6% 2% 64
Miller Group 16 59% 16% 8% 11% 2% 0% 3% 3% 67
Miller Group 15 65% 11% 5% 4% 7% 0% 4% 4% 75
Miller Group 14 77% 6% 8% 4% 0% 1% 3% 143
Miller Group 12 75% 7% 7% 4% 0% 0% 6% 67
Miller Group 11 77% 10% 9% 2% 0% 1% 1% 81
Miller Group 10 84% 8% 5% 3% 0% 0% 0% 100
Miller Group 09 79% 0% 12% 3% 0% 3% 0% 34
Miller Group 08 65% 6% 13% 9% 2% 2% 1% 127
Miller Group 07 42% 11% 21% 14% 2% 2% 5% 66
Miler Group 06 65% 14% 8% 7% 2% 2% 1% 179
NuCana 57% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 14% 0% 7
Net Cracker 17 64% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 9% 18% 11
Net Cracker 16 88% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 6% 16
Net Cracker 15 85% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 5% 21
Net Cracker 14 63% 4% 4% 0% 4% 13% 4% 24
Origo 18 54% 13% 8% 13% 4% 2% 6% 0% 48
Origo 17 63% 6% 6% 6% 4% 0% 8% 6% 50
Premier Inn 18 No Response
Premier Inn 17 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
Premier Inn 16 No Response
Premier Inn 15 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
Regus 18 71% 0% 0% 12% 6% 6% 6% 0% 17
Regus 17 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2
Regus 16 No Response
Regus 15 No Response
Regus 14 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2
Regus 12 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
Regus 11 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 2
Regus 10 57% 0% 29% 14% 0% 0% 0% 7
Regus 09 33% 33% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 3
Regus 08 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
RSPB 18 24% 8% 10% 26% 10% 0% 23% 0% 62
RSPB 17 19% 4% 12% 26% 16% 0% 23% 0% 74
RSPB 16 23% 2% 16% 20% 17% 0% 19% 0% 69
RSPB 15 8% 8% 19% 22% 14% 0% 27% 3% 37
RSPB 14 22% 6% 23% 16% 0% 30% 4% 69
RSPB 12 13% 8% 33% 13% 0% 29% 4% 24
RSPB 11 16% 7% 30% 16% 0% 30% 2% 44
RSPB 10 12% 10% 51% 16% 0% 5% 7% 44
Sainsburys Bank 18 54% 10% 8% 11% 10% 1% 2% 2% 283
Sainsburys Bank 17 54% 6% 8% 14% 10% 0% 5% 2% 367
Sainsburys Bank 16 59% 6% 9% 9% 8% 0% 6% 3% 163
Sainsburys Bank 15 55% 8% 9% 14% 9% 0% 3% 3% 141
SLR 18 43% 0% 19% 10% 10% 5% 10% 5% 21
SLR 17 53% 0% 18% 12% 0% 6% 12% 0% 17
SLR 16 50% 5% 18% 5% 14% 5% 0% 5% 22
Version1 18 35% 18% 12% 0% 24% 0% 6% 6% 17
Version1 17 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 50% 2
Version1 16 40% 20% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 22
Version1 15 40% 14% 20% 7% 0% 0% 13% 7% 16
Viavi 18 53% 6% 0% 0% 6% 0% 24% 6% 17
Viavi 17 47% 0% 0% 7% 13% 0% 13% 13% 15
Viavi 16 58% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 12% 8% 26
WSP|PB 18 52% 8% 6% 10% 13% 0% 9% 0% 86
WSP|PB 17 37% 7% 7% 10% 17% 0% 20% 2% 41
WSP|PB 16 44% 8% 9% 11% 12% 0% 15% 2% 66
WSP|PB 15 56% 4% 2% 15% 15% 0% 6% 2% 49
WSP 14 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1
WSP 12 64% 7% 9% 9% 0% 7% 5% 44
WSP 11 52% 0% 18% 15% 0% 12% 3% 33
WSP 10 47% 4% 25% 13% 2% 9% 0% 55
WSP 09 54% 0% 14% 21% 0% 11% 0% 28
WSP 08 44% 10% 29% 13% 0% 5% 0% 62
WSP 07 55% 7% 19% 10% 2% 0% 5% _
Control Information
Prepared by Prepared for
Steer Edinburgh Park (Management) Ltd 28-32 Upper Ground 4 Lochside Place London SE1 9PD Edinburgh Park +44 20 7910 5000 Edinburgh www.steergroup.com EH12 9DF
Steer project/proposal number Client contract/project number 23278601
Author/originator Reviewer/approver John Geelan Helen Bonner
Other contributors Distribution Client: Steer:
Version control/issue number Date Issue 1 – Draft to Edinburgh Park July 2018 Issue 2 – Draft to stakeholders August 2018
steergroup.com