METABOLIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS IN LISTERIA

MONOCYTOGENES ANAEROBIC VIRULENCE REGULATION

Dissertation

Submitted to

The College of Arts and Sciences of the

UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

The Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy in Biology

By

Nathan Christopher Wallace

Dayton, OH

December 2018

METABOLIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS IN LISTERIA

MONOCYTOGENES ANAEROBIC VIRULENCE REGULATION

Name: Wallace, Nathan Christopher

APPROVED BY:

Yvonne Sun, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor

Amit Singh, Ph.D. Committee Member

Donald Comfort, Ph.D. Committee Member

Jayne Robinson, Ph.D. Committee Member

Pothitos Pitychoutis, Ph.D. Committee Member

ii ABSTRACT

METABOLIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS IN LISTERIA

MONOCYTOGENES ANAEROBIC VIRULENCE REGULATION

Name: Wallace, Nathan C. University of Dayton

Adviser: Dr. Yvonne Sun

In order for enteric pathogens to be successful in causing their infection they must overcome various environmental factors including: low pH, decreased oxygen, high osmolarity, nutrient competition, and host immune system etc. One such pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes), is well known for being extremely adaptable and avoids host immune defenses by causing its infection intracellularly. This unique infection route makes L. monocytogenes an attractive pathogen for gaining further understanding host immune responses to intracellular pathogens. However, the majority of studies involving L. monocytogenes take place in the presence of oxygen, which completely omits the anaerobic phase of gastrointestinal infection. The main goal of this study is to understand the effects of anaerobic growth on L. monocytogenes pathogenesis.

Chapter I provides a brief introduction including background information on L. monocytogenes discovery, lifestyle, outbreaks, and pathogenesis.

iii Following the introduction in Chapter II, I give a review on the role of oxygen in the pathogenesis of various other relevant enteric pathogens. Moving into

Chapter III, I look at key morphological differences between aerobic and anaerobic growth conditions and explores how exogenous supplementation of key intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) affects subsequent pathogenesis. This transitions into Chapter IV, where I explore the role of respiratory activity in priming and sustaining intracellular pathogenesis. And finally, Chapter V evaluates the importance of menaquinone biosynthesis in L. monocytogenes growth and subsequent pathogenesis. Together these data support a regulatory role for metabolic activity in the success of L. monocytogenes infection.

iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I express my deepest gratitude to my mentor, Dr. Yvonne Sun. You took a chance on me back in 2014, and I am eternally grateful for the opportunity you gave me to continue my education. I am appreciative of your ability to push me and realize my potential as a scientist. Thank you so very much. Thanks also go to my graduate advisory committee: Dr. Amit Singh, Dr. Jayne Robinson, Dr.

Pothitos Pitychoutis, and Dr. Don Comfort. I appreciate you all meeting with me every semester and always providing insightful comments and suggestions for future experiments.

To my older brother Ryan, thanks for always being a role model for me growing up. You don’t understand how much I appreciate your willingness to provide everything from advice on a particular experiment or just listening when I was having a bad day. Thanks for being an awesome big brother and an even better father to my adorable niece Emilia. I have always wanted to be like my older brother, and now we are now a house of learned doctors.

To my parents, Brian and Karen, I am deeply thankful for the undying support you have both provided me in the pursuit of my education. Ever since I

v was in grade school, you instilled the value of education in me. I came to understand this value on my own in obtaining this degree, and I am grateful for the constant reassurance, especially when I was unsure if I could do this. This dissertation would not have been possible if it weren’t for you two, thank you.

To my sisters Morgan and Madison, thanks for providing me with constant encouragement during the course of my Ph.D. Even if you didn’t know it, our short conversations or simple exchange of texts helped pick me up when I was down. I appreciate all of the support, especially in the form of tasty treats. I also have to give a very special thanks to Shane Childs for helping me keep my car together for the length of my studies, the Mazdarati will live on long past when we put her to rest.

I wouldn’t have made it this far without the help of so many of my lab mates. To everyone who was a part of the Sun lab both past and present thanks for doing everything including: helping me with an experiment, bringing in a tasty treat, or providing some comic relief on a stressful day. I want to specifically thank Ashley Zani and Eric Newton. Ashley, you were the first undergraduate student I worked with during my Ph.D. and you will always hold a special place in my heart. I am so proud of you and so happy to have been a part of your scientific career. I have no doubts that you will be a wonderful scientific writer someday. Eric, you were the second undergraduate student who worked with me. We developed a true friendship over the course of your time in the lab, and I

vi am very grateful for your willingness to help with my experiments. “Lab pops” will live on forever thanks to you.

Thanks to all of the support staff in the University of Dayton Department of

Biology. Thanks to Grover Allen for helping with any technical problems and teaching me so very much about fixing things. Cathy Wolfe for keeping me always on track for graduation. Thanks to Rita McGinn and Jan Bertke for being the best office staff. I always knew you always would be willing to answer my questions or just have a nice chat.

vii TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ...... iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...... v

LIST OF TABLES ...... xii

LIST OF FIGURES ...... xiii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATIONS ...... xv

CHAPTER I BACKGROUND ...... 1

Identification/Nomenclature ...... 1

Environmental Niches ...... 2

L. monocytogenes Outbreaks ...... 3

L. monocytogenes infection ...... 4

Pathogenesis...... 6

Role of Oxygen in Virulence Regulation ...... 8

Thesis Overview ...... 9

References ...... 10

CHAPTER II THE IMPACT OF OXYGEN ON BACTERIAL ENTERIC

PATHOGENS ...... 17

viii Abstract ...... 17

Keywords ...... 18

Enteric pathogens exposed to varying oxygen levels ...... 18

Enteric pathogens responding to varying oxygen levels ...... 22

Bacillus cereus ...... 22

Campylobacter jejuni ...... 25

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli ...... 27

Helicobacter pylori...... 29

Listeria monocytogenes ...... 31

Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium ...... 32

Shigella flexneri ...... 34

Vibrio cholerae ...... 37

Yersinia enterocolitica ...... 38

Conclusion ...... 39

References ...... 41

CHAPTER III METABOLIC DETERMINANTS IN LISTERIA

MONOCYTOGENES ANAEROBIC LISTERIOLYSIN O PRODUCTION...... 72

Abstract ...... 72

Introduction ...... 73

Materials and Methods:...... 75

ix Results ...... 81

Discussion ...... 90

References ...... 96

CHAPTER IV STIMULATING RESPIRATORY ACTIVITY PRIMES

ANAEROBICALLY GROWN LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES FOR

INTRACELLULAR INFECTION ...... 102

Abstract ...... 102

Introduction ...... 103

Results ...... 106

Discussion ...... 117

Materials and Methods...... 122

References ...... 129

CHAPTER V EVALUATING THE IMPORTANCE OF MENAQUINONE

BIOSYNTHESIS IN LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES VIRULENCE

REGULATION ...... 133

Abstract ...... 133

Introduction ...... 134

Results ...... 135

Materials and Methods...... 140

Discussion ...... 143

x References ...... 144

Supplementary Figures ...... 146

CHAPTER VI CONCLUDING REMARKS ...... 147

APPENDIX I The Effect of Oxygen on Hly Transcript ...... 149

Methods: ...... 150

APPENDIX II Evaluation of Redox Homeostasis In Listeria monocytogenes .. 154

Methods ...... 155

xi LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1: Characterizations of L. monocytogenes strain 10403s in vitro growth...... 83

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis ...... 149

xii LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Schematic of L. monocytogenes intracellular infection ...... 8

Figure 3.1 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibits decreased maximal growth in vitro and morphological differences under TEM ...... 82

Figure 3.2 Anaerobic growth of L. monocytogenes leads to increased initial intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localization ... 85

Figure 3.3 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes secretes less LLO ...... 87

Figure 3.4 Buffering media or exogenous supplementation of lactate or acetoin does not alleviate the reduced LLO production under anaerobic conditions relative to aerobic conditions ...... 88

Figure 3.5 Supplementation of intermediates involved in central carbon alters carbon metabolism and increases supernatant LLO activity of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes ...... 90

Figure 4.1. Fumarate enhances L. monocytogenes anaerobic respiratory activity...... 108

Figure 4.2. Fumarate-treated L. monocytogenes exhibited enhanced transition to aerobic in vitro and intracellular growth ...... 110

Figure 4.3. Inhibition of aerobic respiratory activity with CCCP phenocopies anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes ...... 112

xiii Figure 4.4. Modulations of respiratory activity alter production of LLO and actin co-localization ...... 115

Figure 4.5. Prior or concurrent fumarate treatments enhance cell-cell spread . 117

Figure 5.1: Anaerobic growth increase with fumarate supplementation abolished in the ∆MenB strain possibly due to manipulation of the fate of pyruvate ...... 137

Figure 5.2: MenB is critical for aerobic LLO production and intracellular fitness ...... 139

Supplemental Figure 5.1: Screen of respiratory mutants on the basis of growth, acetoin production and hemolytic activity ...... 146

Figure A1.1: Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes shows increased hly transcript activity and stability but does not result in increased LLO abundance ...... 150

Figure A2.1 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibit increased oxidative stress and increased susceptibility to killing by H2O2 due to lack of catalase activity...... 155

xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATIONS

L. monocytogenes Listeria monocytogenes

TCA Cycle Tricarboxylic acid cycle

TCA Trichloroacetic acid

LLO Listeriolysin O

GABA Gamma aminobutyric acid

PrfA Positive regulatory factor A

InlA,B Internalin A and B

PlcA,B Phospholipase C A and B

LAP Listeria adhesion protein

TMAO Trimethylamine N-oxide

DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide

SigB Alternative sigma factor B

DHNA 1,4-dihydroxy-2-napthoate

LB Lysogeny broth

BHI Brain heart infusion

IPTG Isopropyl thiogalactopyranoside

DTT Dithiothreitol

xv CHAPTER I

BACKGROUND

Identification/Nomenclature

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a Gram-positive microorganism capable of causing disease in humans and animals. In history, L. monocytogenes was first characterized as “Bacillus monocytogenes” by G. D.

Murray, R. A. Webb, and M. B. R. Swann in 1924 when the bacterium was isolated from rabbits and guinea pigs who all perished from similar lesions

(Murray, Webb, and Swann 1926). The first case of a human infected with L. monocytogenes was not reported until 1929 in Denmark, but there may have been isolated cultures of L. monocytogenes from meningitis patients as early as

1921 (Dumont, J. and Cotuni, L. 1921). The current genus, Listeria, was not coined until 1939 by J.H. Harvey Pirie at the Third International Congress for

Microbiologists, held in New York City (J.H. Harvey Pirie 1940). As of now, there are several other species of the Listeria genus including: L. welshimeri, L. ivanovii, L. innocua, L. seeligeri, and L. grayi. However only L. monocytogenes and L. ivanovii are pathogenic. Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is

1 now divided into 13 serotypes based on their somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens, which are as follows: 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 5,

7 (Seeliger and Höhne 1979). Clinically speaking, there has been higher prevalence of serotype 4b isolated from human listeriosis patients. For example, one study demonstrated that in a population of over 1300 infected individuals

64% of the isolated L. monocytogenes were of the 4b serotype, followed by 1/2a and 1/2b with 15% and 10%, respectively (McLauchlin 1990). This differs from cultures isolated from food, which are typically from the 1/2a serotype. In one

Belgian study a prevalence of L. monocytogenes isolated from food stuffs was heavily in favor of the 1/2a serotype (54%) followed by 4b (20%) (Gilot, Genicot, and André 1996). Additional characterization of L. monocytogenes separates into

3 different lineages (Lineage 1, 2, and 3) based on differences in the nucleotide sequences of the virulence factors hly, actA, and inlA (Zhang et al. 2003;

Rasmussen et al. 1995). Serotypes 1/2b, 3b, 3c, 4b, 4d, and 4e fall into lineage

1; 1/2a, 1/2c and 3a are in lineage 2; and lineage 3 contains 4a and 4c. Further analysis supported a higher incidence of lineage 1 L. monocytogenes isolated from clinics when compared to lineages 2 and 3 (Zhang et al. 2003).

Environmental Niches

L. monocytogenes is a naturally occurring organism found in the soil

(Welshimer 1960) and water (Lyautey et al. 2007). It is considered to be a saprophyte (Gray and Killinger 1966), which is an organism that lives off of dead

2 or decaying organic matter. As a saprophyte, L. monocytogenes encounters various other microbes, fungi, and protists with which it must compete and persist

(Hilbi et al. 2007). Several studies have looked at the spatial and temporal prevalence of L. monocytogenes found in the soil. Prevalence of L. monocytogenes was much higher (~30%) in samples from uncultivated fields or meadows compared to a much lower (~8%) in samples from cultivated fields

(Dowe et al. 1997). In one study, during the summer months the prevalence of L. monocytogenes is much higher in natural environments, and simultaneously at its lowest in urban environments (Sauders et al. 2012). However, in another study the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was much higher in vegetable farms in 2 out of 3 years (Strawn et al. 2013), which points to variability of L. monocytogenes in terms of environmental prevalence. When L. monocytogenes ceases life as a saprophyte and enters the realm of human food it becomes a major public health concern.

L. monocytogenes Outbreaks

L. monocytogenes infections were considered to be a laboratory rarity from its discovery until around 1970, when the incidence of foodborne contamination steadily increased through the 1980’s (Fleming et al. 1985; Büla,

Bille, and Glauser 1995; Schlech 2000). One of the deadliest outbreaks occurred in 1985 in Los Angeles County, California. Over 142 cases of Listeriosis were reported, and of those individuals affected, 48 died as a result; 20 of which were

3 unborn fetuses (Linnan et al. 1988). The source of the contamination was L. monocytogenes-contaminated milk that was used to make Mexican-style soft cheese (queso fresco). The cause of the contamination was due to the improper pasteurization of the milk prior to the cheese being made. This is one the largest cases of food-poisoning related deaths reported in the United States. Another such example of a large-scale L. monocytogenes contamination occurred in

2011. In this case, a multi-state L. monocytogenes outbreak occurred in contaminated cantaloupe. Over the course of 3 months, a total of 146 cases of listeriosis were reported, of which 30 individuals died and one pregnant mother miscarried. Upon further investigation, the source of the contamination was traced to Jensen Farms in Colorado. Multiple surfaces in the processing facility were contaminated with L. monocytogenes, and due to the poor design, proper sanitization of the facility was difficult (Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention 2011).

L. monocytogenes infection

L. monocytogenes infection can lead to various disease outcomes such as: invasive listeriosis, non-invasive gastroenteritis, and in some rare cases eczematous skin infection. Listeriosis as a disease is defined as an invasive L. monocytogenes infection, which typically infects sterile areas in the body such as: liver (Wing and Gregory 2002), cerebral spinal fluid (Cone et al. 2003), spleen

(Aoshi et al. 2009), blood (Bhat et al. 2013), and in some rare cases the heart

4 (Summa and Walker 2010). Although typically a rare infection (World Health

Organization and Nations 2004), Listeriosis has a high mortality rate when compared to other foodborne pathogens (Scallan et al. 2011b) with mortality rates ranging from 14-30% (Hernandez-Milian and Payeras-Cifre 2014). The majority of the population that develop invasive listeriosis infection are immunocompromised. The major risk groups include: pregnant women, the elderly, infants, and anyone on immunosuppressants (Buchanan et al. 2017).

Generally, L. monocytogenes is susceptible to most first choice antibiotics such as: penicillin, ampicillin, and aminoglycosides (Swaminathan and Gerner-Smidt

2007). However, in some cases even with early treatment L. monocytogenes can still cause bacteremia and patient death. In fact, one such study showed that even adequately timed antibiotic treatment of affected individuals still had a 15% mortality rate.(Thønnings et al. 2016) .

Most healthy individuals will not develop invasive listeriosis infection, but may instead experience acute, self-limiting febrile gastroenteritis. It is believed that this non-invasive form of L. monocytogenes infection is much more common than is reported due to the nature of the disease’s symptoms. Common symptoms include: fever, diarrhea, nausea, headache, and musculoskeletal pain.

Typically, this occurs when the patient has ingested large quantities of L. monocytogenes and symptoms will generally appear in a matter of 24 hours and last about 2 days (Ooi and Lorber 2005). In very rare cases, L. monocytogenes may also cause a cutaneous skin infection that is typically identified by the presence of nonpainful, localized, skin lesions. These are typically as a result of

5 a veterinarian coming into direct contact with infected animals. Specifically, most reported cases are during bovine calf delivery or abortion, and there have also been few reports of cutaneous infection as a result of direct contact with soil where L. monocytogenes was present (Godshall, Suh, and Lorber 2013).

Pathogenesis

In order for L. monocytogenes to cause invasive listeriosis it must enter host cells through facilitated endocytosis or phagocytosis. Invasion of non- phagocytic cells is a unique characteristic and L. monocytogenes expresses two main virulence factors for this process to occur: Internalin A and B (InlA and InlB)

(Gaillard et al. 1991). InlA interacts with the host cell surface protein e-cadherin

(Mengaud et al. 1996) and InlB binds to the met receptor tyrosine kinase (Shen et al. 2000). Successful binding initiates a signaling cascade that promotes the internalization of L. monocytogenes into the host cell by a vacuole. Escape from the vacuole is mediated by the secretion of the pore-forming toxin listeriolysin O

(LLO) (Cossart et al. 1989) and two phospholipases C (PlcA and PlcB)

(Leimeister-Wächter, Domann, and Chakraborty 1991). When inside the cytosol,

L. monocytogenes expresses another virulence factor, actin assembly-inducing protein (ActA), which polymerizes host actin filaments to one bacterial cell pole and through the polymerization process propels itself into the host cell membrane

(Portnoy, Auerbuch, and Glomski 2002; Vázquez-Boland et al. 2001). This

6 propulsion leads to the formation of a protrusion into neighboring cells and the escape process repeats.

The only known virulence regulator in L. monocytogenes is the transcription factor positive regulatory factor A (PrfA), which is similar in structure and function to other cyclic AMP receptor (CRP) (Chakraborty et al.

1992; Lampidis et al. 1994; Menguad et al. 1991; Sheehan et al. 1995). All known L. monocytogenes virulence factors are under the direct control of PrfA by binding to its site upstream of each virulence gene locus in an area known as the

PrfA box (Luo et al. 2004; Milohanic et al. 2003; Vega et al. 2004). PrfA is regulated by carbon sources such as and cellobiose, which decrease virulence factor production (Milenbachs et al. 1997). Alternatively, carbon sources such as glucose-1-phosphate increase virulence factor production (Ripio et al. 1997). This is an example of the importance of environmental factors such as carbon source on virulence regulation in L. monocytogenes.

7

Listeria Phagosome

Disrupted Phagosome InlA Actin propelled Listeria InlB

LLO PlcA/B

LLO PlcA/B

Figure 1.1 Schematic of L. monocytogenes intracellular infection

Role of Oxygen in Virulence Regulation

One other such example of the importance of environmental factors on virulence regulation is the presence or absence of oxygen. The majority of research performed on L. monocytogenes virulence regulation has the bacteria cultured aerobically, however this fails to address the anaerobic phase of infection that occurs in the intestines. As an enteric pathogen, L. monocytogenes is exposed to decreasing concentrations of oxygen as it is transmitted through the gastrointestinal tract. The environment of the gastrointestinal tract has

8 oxygen concentrations ranging from less than 1mmHg in the cecum (Albenberg et al. 2014b) to 100mmHg (Pittman 2011) in the arteries of the submucosal tissue. Therefore, it is important to consider what role these changes in oxygen levels may have on virulence regulation.

There is limited evidence for the role of anaerobic conditions in L. monocytogenes virulence regulation. Several studies have shown increased invasion of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes in cultured cell lines (James and Keevil 1999; Müsken et al. 2008; Schüller and Phillips 2010). Specifically, under anaerobic conditions the Listeria Adhesion Protein (LAP) is upregulated and promotes adhesion to cultured intestinal epithelial cells and is necessary for in vivo infection in mice (Burkholder et al. 2009). It was later determined that increased LAP secretion under anaerobic conditions promotes the expression of the LAP receptor-Hsp60 (Burkholder and Bhunia 2010). Further studies are required to have a more in-depth understanding of the effects of oxygen on L. monocytogenes infection outcome.

Thesis Overview

This thesis utilized various molecular, biochemical, and tissue culture techniques to evaluate anaerobic virulence regulation in Listeria monocytogenes.

In chapter II we provide an in-depth review on the known information regarding the role of oxygen in virulence regulation of various common enteric pathogens.

Then in chapter III we specifically look at L. monocytogenes and evaluate the

9 role of TCA cycle intermediates in the production of a key virulence factor, LLO.

This research showed that exogenous supplementation of key intermediates of the TCA cycle had the potential to enhance the production of LLO. In chapter IV we evaluate the role of respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes infection.

Supplementation of exogenous fumarate showed the potential to enhance intracellular growth, particularly that of L. monocytogenes that was cultured anaerobically. In chapter V we looked to the role of menaquinone biosynthesis in virulence regulation as a means of better establishing a connection between metabolic activity and pathogenesis.

References

Albenberg, Lindsey, et al. “Correlation Between Intraluminal Oxygen Gradient and Radial Partitioning of Intestinal Microbiota.” Gastroenterology, vol. 147, no. 5, Nov. 2014, p. 1055–1063.e8. ScienceDirect, doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.020.

Aoshi, Taiki, et al. “The Cellular Niche of Listeria Monocytogenes Infection Changes Rapidly in the Spleen.” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 2, Feb. 2009, pp. 417–25. PubMed, doi:10.1002/eji.200838718.

Bhat, Shakoor Ahmad, et al. “Isolation, Molecular Detection and Antibiogram of Listeria Monocytogenes from Human Clinical Cases and Fish of Kashmir, India.” Comparative Clinical Pathology, vol. 22, no. 4, July 2013, pp. 661–65. Springer Link, doi:10.1007/s00580-012-1462-1.

Buchanan, Robert L., et al. “A Review of Listeria Monocytogenes: An Update on Outbreaks, Virulence, Dose-Response, Ecology, and Risk Assessments.” Food Control, vol. 75, May 2017, pp. 1–13. ScienceDirect, doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016.

Büla, C. J., et al. “An Epidemic of Food-Borne Listeriosis in Western Switzerland: Description of 57 Cases Involving Adults.” Clinical Infectious Diseases: An

10 Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol. 20, no. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 66–72.

Burkholder, Kristin M., et al. “Expression of LAP, a SecA2-Dependent Secretory Protein, Is Induced under Anaerobic Environment.” Microbes and Infection, vol. 11, no. 10, Sept. 2009, pp. 859–67. ScienceDirect, doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.05.006.

Burkholder, Kristin M., and Arun K. Bhunia. “Listeria Monocytogenes Uses Listeria Adhesion Protein (LAP) to Promote Bacterial Transepithelial Translocation and Induces Expression of LAP Receptor Hsp60.” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 5062–73. PubMed, doi:10.1128/IAI.00516-10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Associated with Jensen Farms Cantaloupe--United States, August-September 2011.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 60, no. 39, Oct. 2011, pp. 1357–58.

Chakraborty, T., et al. “Coordinate Regulation of Virulence Genes in Listeria Monocytogenes Requires the Product of the prfA Gene.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, no. 2, Jan. 1992, pp. 568–74.

Cone, Lawrence A., et al. “Multiple Cerebral Abscesses because of Listeria Monocytogenes: Three Case Reports and a Literature Review of Supratentorial Listerial Brain Abscess(es).” Surgical Neurology, vol. 59, no. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 320–28.

Cossart, P., et al. “Listeriolysin O Is Essential for Virulence of Listeria Monocytogenes: Direct Evidence Obtained by Gene Complementation.” Infection and Immunity, vol. 57, no. 11, Nov. 1989, pp. 3629–36.

Dowe, Mark J., et al. “Listeria Monocytogenes Survival in Soil and Incidence in Agricultural Soils.” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 60, no. 10, Oct. 1997, pp. 1201–07. jfoodprotection.org (Atypon), doi:10.4315/0362-028X-60.10.1201.

Dumont, J., and Cotuni, L. “Bacilte Semblable a Celui Du Rouget de Pore Rencontre Dans Le L. C. R. D’uu Meningitique. (1921) 625-633.” Ann. Inst., vol. 35, 1921, pp. 625–33.

Fleming et al. Pasteurized Milk as a Vehicle of Infection in an Outbreak of Listeriosis | NEJM. 1985, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198502143120704.

11 Gaillard, J. L., et al. “Entry of L. Monocytogenes into Cells Is Mediated by Internalin, a Repeat Protein Reminiscent of Surface Antigens from Gram-Positive Cocci.” Cell, vol. 65, no. 7, June 1991, pp. 1127–41. Gilot, P., et al. “Serotyping and Esterase Typing for Analysis of Listeria Monocytogenes Populations Recovered from Foodstuffs and from Human Patients with Listeriosis in Belgium.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 4, Apr. 1996, pp. 1007–10.

Godshall, Casey E., et al. “Cutaneous Listeriosis.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 11, Nov. 2013, pp. 3591–96. PubMed Central, doi:10.1128/JCM.01974-13.

Gray, M. L., and A. H. Killinger. “Listeria Monocytogenes and Listeric Infections.” Bacteriological Reviews, vol. 30, no. 2, June 1966, pp. 309–82.

Hernandez-Milian, Almudena, and Antoni Payeras-Cifre. “What Is New in Listeriosis?” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, 2014. PubMed Central, doi:10.1155/2014/358051.

Hilbi, Hubert, et al. “Environmental Predators as Models for Bacterial Pathogenesis.” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 563–75. PubMed, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01238. x.

James, B. W., and C. W. Keevil. “Influence of Oxygen Availability on Physiology, Verocytotoxin Expression and Adherence of O157.” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 86, no. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 117–24.

J.H. Harvey Pirie. Listeria: Change of Name for a Genus Bacteria | Nature. 17 Feb. 1940, https://www.nature.com/articles/145264a0.

Lampidis, R., et al. “The Virulence Regulator Protein of Listeria Ivanovii Is Highly Homologous to PrfA from Listeria Monocytogenes and Both Belong to the Crp- Fnr Family of Transcription Regulators.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, July 1994, pp. 141–51.

Leimeister-Wächter, M., et al. “Detection of a Gene Encoding a Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase C That Is Co-Ordinately Expressed with Listeriolysin in Listeria Monocytogenes.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 2, Feb. 1991, pp. 361–66.

Linnan, M. J., et al. “Epidemic Listeriosis Associated with Mexican-Style Cheese.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 319, no. 13, Sept. 1988, pp. 823–28. PubMed, doi:10.1056/NEJM198809293191303.

Luo, Qin, et al. “In Vitro Transcription of the Listeria Monocytogenes Virulence Genes inlC and Mpl Reveals Overlapping PrfA-Dependent and -Independent

12 Promoters That Are Differentially Activated by GTP.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 1, Apr. 2004, pp. 39–52. PubMed, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03960. x. Lyautey, Emilie, et al. “Distribution and Characteristics of Listeria Monocytogenes Isolates from Surface Waters of the South Nation River Watershed, Ontario, Canada.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 17, Sept. 2007, pp. 5401–10. PubMed, doi:10.1128/AEM.00354-07.

McLauchlin, J. “Distribution of Serovars of Listeria Monocytogenes Isolated from Different Categories of Patients with Listeriosis.” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 3, Mar. 1990, pp. 210–13.

Mengaud, Jérôme, et al. “E-Cadherin Is the Receptor for Internalin, a Surface Protein Required for Entry of L. Monocytogenes into Epithelial Cells.” Cell, vol. 84, no. 6, Mar. 1996, pp. 923–32. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/S0092- 8674(00)81070-3.

Menguad et al. Pleiotropic Control of Listeria Monocytogenes Virulence Factors by a Gene That Is Autoregulated - Mengaud - 1991 - Molecular Microbiology - Wiley Online Library. 1991, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb02158.x.

Milenbachs, A. A., et al. “Carbon-Source Regulation of Virulence Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 23, no. 5, Mar. 1997, pp. 1075–85.

Milohanic, Eliane, et al. “Transcriptome Analysis of Listeria Monocytogenes Identifies Three Groups of Genes Differently Regulated by PrfA.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 6, Mar. 2003, pp. 1613–25.

Murray, E. G. D., et al. “A Disease of Rabbits Characterised by a Large Mononuclear Leucocytosis, Caused by a Hitherto Undescribed Bacillus Bacterium Monocytogenes (N.sp.).” The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, vol. 29, no. 4, Jan. 1926, pp. 407–39. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1002/path.1700290409.

Müsken, Anne, et al. “Anaerobic Conditions Promote Expression of Sfp Fimbriae and Adherence of Sorbitol-Fermenting Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:NM to Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 74, no. 4, Feb. 2008, pp. 1087–93. PubMed, doi:10.1128/AEM.02496-07.

Ooi, Say Tat, and Bennett Lorber. “Gastroenteritis due to Listeria Monocytogenes.” Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the

13 Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol. 40, no. 9, May 2005, pp. 1327–32. PubMed, doi:10.1086/429324.

Pittman, Roland N. Oxygen Transport. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, 2011. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54103/. Portnoy, Daniel A., et al. “The Cell Biology of Listeria Monocytogenes Infection.” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 158, no. 3, Aug. 2002, pp. 409–14. PubMed Central, doi:10.1083/jcb.200205009.

Rasmussen, O. F., et al. “Listeria Monocytogenes Exists in at Least Three Evolutionary Lines: Evidence from Flagellin, Invasive Associated Protein and Listeriolysin O Genes.” Microbiology (Reading, England), vol. 141 ( Pt 9), Sept. 1995, pp. 2053–61. PubMed, doi:10.1099/13500872-141-9-2053.

Ripio, M. T., et al. “Glucose-1-Phosphate Utilization by Listeria Monocytogenes Is PrfA Dependent and Coordinately Expressed with Virulence Factors.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 22, Nov. 1997, pp. 7174–80.

Sauders, Brian D., et al. “Diversity of Listeria Species in Urban and Natural Environments.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 78, no. 12, June 2012, pp. 4420–33. PubMed, doi:10.1128/AEM.00282-12.

Scallan, Elaine, et al. “Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens.” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 7–15. PubMed Central, doi:10.3201/eid1701.P11101.

Schlech, W. F. “Foodborne Listeriosis.” Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol. 31, no. 3, Sept. 2000, pp. 770–75. PubMed, doi:10.1086/314008.

Schüller, Stephanie, and Alan D. Phillips. “Microaerobic Conditions Enhance Type III Secretion and Adherence of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli to Polarized Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells.” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 9, Sept. 2010, pp. 2426–35. PubMed, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02216.x.

Seeliger, H. P. R., and K. Höhne. “Chapter II Serotyping of Listeria Monocytogenes and Related Species.” Methods in Microbiology, edited by T. Bergan and J. R. Norris, vol. 13, Academic Press, 1979, pp. 31–49. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70372-6.

Sheehan, B., et al. “Differential Activation of Virulence Gene Expression by PrfA, the Listeria Monocytogenes Virulence Regulator.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 177, no. 22, Nov. 1995, pp. 6469–76.

14 Shen, Yang, et al. “InlB-Dependent Internalization of Listeria Is Mediated by the Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase.” Cell, vol. 103, no. 3, Oct. 2000, pp. 501–10. www.cell.com, doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00141-0.

Strawn, Laura K., et al. “Landscape and Meteorological Factors Affecting Prevalence of Three Food-Borne Pathogens in Fruit and Vegetable Farms.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 79, no. 2, Jan. 2013, pp. 588–600. aem.asm.org, doi:10.1128/AEM.02491-12.

Summa, Claudia, and Sandra A. N. Walker. “Endocarditis Due to Listeria Monocytogenes in an Academic Teaching Hospital: Case Report.” The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, vol. 63, no. 4, 2010, pp. 312–14.

Swaminathan, Bala, and Peter Gerner-Smidt. “The Epidemiology of Human Listeriosis.” Microbes and Infection, vol. 9, no. 10, Aug. 2007, pp. 1236–43. PubMed, doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.011.

Thønnings, S., et al. “Antibiotic Treatment and Mortality in Patients with Listeria Monocytogenes Meningitis or Bacteraemia.” Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 8, Aug. 2016, pp. 725–30. PubMed, doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.06.006.

Vázquez-Boland, José A., et al. “Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants.” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3, July 2001, pp. 584– 640. PubMed Central, doi:10.1128/CMR.14.3.584-640.2001.

Vega, Yolanda, et al. “New Listeria Monocytogenes prfA* Mutants, Transcriptional Properties of PrfA* Proteins and Structure–function of the Virulence Regulator PrfA.” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 6, June 2004, pp. 1553–65. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04052.x.

Welshimer, H. J. “Survival of Listeria Monocytogenes in Soil.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 80, Sept. 1960, pp. 316–20.

Wing, Edward J., and Stephen H. Gregory. “Listeria Monocytogenes: Clinical and Experimental Update.” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 185 Suppl 1, Feb. 2002, pp. S18-24. PubMed, doi:10.1086/338465.

World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Risk Assessment of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Technical Report. Rome : FAO, 2004. apps.who.int, http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42875.

15 Zhang, Chaomei, et al. “Genome Diversification in Phylogenetic Lineages I and II of Listeria Monocytogenes: Identification of Segments Unique to Lineage II Populations.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 18, Sept. 2003, pp. 5573–84.

16 CHAPTER II

THE IMPACT OF OXYGEN ON BACTERIAL ENTERIC PATHOGENS

This work was originally published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal

Advances in Applied Microbiology in 2016 with the following citation: Wallace, N.,

A. Zani, E. Abrams, and Y. Sun. 2016. The Impact of Oxygen on Bacterial

Enteric Pathogens. Advances in Applied Microbiology 95: 179–204.

Abstract

Bacterial enteric pathogens are responsible for a tremendous amount of foodborne illnesses every year through consumption of contaminated food products. During their transit from contaminated food sources to the host gastrointestinal tract, these pathogens are exposed and must adapt to fluctuating oxygen levels in order to successfully colonize the host and cause diseases.

However, the majority of enteric infection research has been conducted under aerobic conditions. To raise awareness of the importance in understanding the impact of oxygen, or a lack of oxygen, on enteric pathogenesis, we describe in this review the metabolic and physiological responses of nine bacterial enteric pathogens while exposed to environments with different oxygen levels. We

17 further discuss the effects of oxygen levels on virulence regulation to establish potential connections between metabolic adaptations and bacterial pathogenesis.

While not providing an exhaustive list of all bacterial pathogens, we highlight key differences and similarities among nine facultative anaerobic and microaerobic pathogens in this review to argue for a more in-depth understanding of the diverse impact oxygen levels have on enteric pathogenesis.

Keywords

Bacillus cereus, Campylobacter jejuni, Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli, Helicobacter pylori, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium,

Shigella flexneri, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, anaerobiosis, virulence regulation,

Enteric pathogens exposed to varying oxygen levels

Foodborne illnesses result in high medical and societal burden at a global level (Kirk et al. 2015). Bacterial pathogens are among the top leading causes for foodborne diseases (Scallan et al. 2011a). In United States, Salmonella enterica,

Campylobacter, and Listeria monocytogenes together are responsible for over

50% of annual cost of illness related to foodborne infections (Hoffmann, Batz, and Morris 2012). Understanding the incidence rate and cost has helped establishing and prioritizing appropriate strategies to reduce foodborne diseases.

18 For example, optimization in food packaging and storage conditions can be an effective approach to reduce or eliminate bacterial contamination and subsequently prevent foodborne infections.

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is an extensively studied and investigated method that aims to reduce microbial growth and maintain freshness of food products to extend shelf life by reducing oxygen levels in food packaging

(Kader, Zagory, and Kerbel 1989; Lee et al. 2015). MAP works by replacing air with altered concentrations of oxygen, CO2, or nitrogen to extend the life and quality of the food product and simultaneously reduce microbial growth.

However, while the overall microbial growth is reduced with decreased oxygen levels, many foodborne bacterial pathogens are anaerobes, facultative anaerobes, or microaerophiles and can survive and even proliferate under suboxic conditions (Al-Qadiri et al. 2015). The ability for pathogens to persist under suboxic conditions raises two important questions. First, it is not clear if suboxic conditions contribute to the enrichment of pathogens in food products by suppressing the growth of non-pathogenic bacteria while allowing the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Second, because the majority of bacterial pathogenesis research is conducted under the optimal growth conditions for the pathogen, it is not clear how exposure to the potentially stressful suboxic conditions by the pathogen may impact subsequent infectivity. Therefore, it is beneficial to obtain a better understanding of how foodborne pathogens respond to suboxic conditions to develop and implement strategies to prevent foodborne infections with MAP.

19

In addition to environmental exposure of changing oxygen levels, enteric pathogens also face a dynamic gastrointestinal (GI) tract with fluctuating oxygen concentrations. Under normal, healthy conditions, there is a natural oxygen gradient in the GI tract with a decreasing trend in oxygen tension from stomach to large intestines (Sheridan, Lowndes, and Young 1990; He et al. 1999; Cooper,

Sherry, and Thorpe 1995). There is also a transverse gradient in the lower gastrointestinal tract where the lumen is devoid of oxygen, which is depleted by the endogenous microbes, while the mucosal surface is relatively enriched with oxygen (Albenberg et al. 2014a; Karhausen et al. 2004; Marteyn et al. 2010), which is supplied by the underlying vasculature. These two intersecting oxygen gradients are further complicated by temporal fluctuations. For example, as flood flow to the intestines increases after meal, the supply of oxygen to the intestinal mucosa likely increases as well. Moreover, during inflammation and other enteric disease states, mucosal oxygenation level significantly decreases, often leading to induction of hypoxia responses (Jantsch and Schödel 2015; Shehade,

Oldenhove, and Moser 2014; Colgan and Taylor 2010; Campbell et al. 2014;

Karhausen et al. 2004; Cooper, Sherry, and Thorpe 1995). These scenarios paint a complex and dynamic picture of oxygen levels in the GI environment during pathogen transit through the GI tract and further support a need to understand how enteric pathogens respond to fluctuating oxygen levels.

20 The ability for enteric pathogens to sense and respond to fluctuating oxygen levels is critical in surviving environments with changing oxygen levels and depends on various metabolic and physiological adaptations. This global scale of adaptations to fluctuating oxygen levels is choreographed by a multitude of transcriptional regulators. For example, Fnr and ArcAB are commonly found in enteric bacterial pathogens and represent two best-studied transcriptional regulators heavily involved in adaptations to fluctuating oxygen levels. Fnr is a cytosolic protein with an iron-sulfur cluster cofactor as the oxygen-sensing domain and a DNA-binding domain to regulate a variety of genes involved in anaerobic processes (Körner, Sofia, and Zumft 2003; Spiro 1994; Spiro and

Guest 1990; Unden and Bongaerts 1997). ArcAB is a two-component signal transduction system in which the sensor kinase ArcB responds to the redox state of the cell (Bekker et al. 2010; Georgellis, Kwon, and Lin 2001; Malpica et al.

2004), and the ArcA modifies the transcription of a large number of genes to adapt to the changing redox states (Evans et al. 2011;

Gunsalus and Park 1994). Many more transcriptional regulators, often working with Fnr or ArcAB, are also involved in the response to fluctuating oxygen levels.

Together, these regulators lay the foundation for enteric pathogens to sense the changing oxygen levels and respond in both metabolic adaptations and virulence regulation.

21

Enteric pathogens responding to varying oxygen levels

Most research on enteric pathogenesis is conducted under normal atmospheric conditions. Nevertheless, a significant body of literature has provided key insights into the impact of suboxic conditions on enteric pathogens.

In this review, in order to provide a concise and focused comparison between different enteric pathogens, we purposely avoid discussions on oxidative stresses, which can take place regardless of oxygen concentrations, and choose to focus on work where oxygen levels were intentionally modulated during experimental procedures. Moreover, we also limit the discussions on facultative anaerobes and microaerophiles to provide a better comparison among organisms with wider range of oxygen tolerance for growth. Therefore, although not an exhaustive list of enteric pathogens and their responses, the following sections represent our sincere effort to highlight key similarities and differences.

Bacillus cereus

Bacillus cereus is a facultative anaerobe and a spore-forming enteric pathogen. B. cereus cause two distinct types of gastrointestinal diseases, the emetic and diarrheal syndromes (Bottone 2010). The emetic syndrome is caused by the emetic toxin cereulide found in the food products and therefore exhibits a short incubation period. In contrast, the diarrheal syndrome has a longer

22 incubation period and is caused by vegetative B. cereus in the intestines producing cytotoxins—hemolysin BL (Hbl), non-hemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe), and cytotoxin K (CytK) (Arnesen, Fagerlund, and Granum 2008).

The expression of these toxins are highly regulated by metabolism and environmental conditions (Arnesen, Fagerlund, and Granum 2008; van der Voort et al. 2008; Han, Sullivan, and Wilson 2015; Hayrapetyan et al. 2015). Anaerobic growth, in particular, has been consistently shown to result in increased toxin production (Duport et al. 2004; Zigha et al. 2006; Zigha et al. 2007a; Clair et al.

2010; van der Voort and Abee 2009; Gilois et al. 2007). B. cereus toxin production is regulated by redox-sensitive regulators, such as OhrRA, a redox- sensitive system involved in the expression of Hbl and Nhe (Clair et al. 2013) and

ResDE, a redox-sensitive two component signal transduction system involved in anaerobic induction of Hbl and Nhe production (Duport et al. 2006; Esbelin et al.

2009; Laouami et al. 2014). Mutations in resDE, without inhibiting anaerobic growth, lead to compromised anaerobic Hbl and Nhe production (Duport et al.

2006). The role of the ResDE system in transcriptional regulation of hbl and nhe was demonstrated by the response regulator ResD binding directly to the toxin gene promoters (Esbelin et al. 2009). Interestingly, ResD was also shown to bind to promoter sequence of plcR as well as fnr. PlcR, or phospholipase C regulator, is a transcriptional regulator activated by quorum sensing (Slamti and Lereclus

2002; Declerck et al. 2007) and is involved in the activation of toxin production

(Agaisse et al. 1999; Gohar et al. 2002; Gohar et al. 2008). Fnr, which is up- regulated in strain F4430/73 but not in strain ATCC 14579 under anaerobic

23 conditions, also contributes to Nhe and Hbl production (Esbelin et al. 2008; Zigha et al. 2007a; Messaoudi et al. 2010). Moreover, Fnr binds directly to the promoter sequences of the toxin genes, nhe and hbl, as well as regulator genes plcR and resDE (Esbelin et al. 2008). Evidence is also available that suggests Fnr directly interact with PlcR and ResD for DNA binding (Esbelin et al. 2009; Esbelin,

Jouanneau, and Duport 2012). These studies demonstrate a complex regulatory network where toxin production can be controlled in response to a variety of signaling pathways and their respective signals.

Exposure to anaerobic conditions impacts many aspects of B. cereus growth. For example, during anaerobic growth, glycolytic genes are up-regulated while tricarboxylic acid cycle genes show no change in the expression level (van der Voort and Abee 2009), indicating changes in carbon metabolism. Moreover, anaerobic growth results in modified membrane fatty acid composition (de Sarrau et al. 2012) and reduced spore formation (Abbas et al. 2014). However, spores formed under anaerobic conditions are more resistant to wet heat and extreme pH (Abbas et al. 2014). Although B. cereus can grow anaerobically through as well as anaerobic respiration of multiple alternative electron acceptors (Rosenfeld et al. 2005), anaerobic growth through glucose fermentation or fumarate respiration, but not nitrate respiration, induces toxin production (Zigha et al. 2007a), a phenotype indicative for additional regulatory signals beyond simple aerobic versus anaerobic switch. Therefore, the exact role

24 of oxygen in the hierarchy and connection among metabolism and virulence regulation is not clear and required further investigations.

Campylobacter jejuni

Campylobacter jejuni is a Gram-negative microaerophilic bacterium and one of the major causes for diarrheal illnesses. A variety of animal hosts and epithelial cell lines have been adapted to determine the mechanisms by which C. jejuni causes intestinal illnesses (Backert et al. 2013) and have shown that while

C. jejuni mainly replicates in the extracellular space, its intracellular persistence can be detected in vivo (Babakhani, Bradley, and Joens 1993; van Spreeuwel et al. 1985). The growth preferences of C. jejuni play an important role in transmission and pathogenesis. Although C. jejuni optimally grows between 37-

42°C and fails to grow at temperature below 30°C, it remains metabolic active and can survive at temperatures as low as 4°C for extended periods of time

(Penner 1988; Hazeleger et al. 1998). Its ability to survive through stressful conditions (Murphy, Carroll, and Jordan 2006) contributes to its persistence through antimicrobial controls during food processing and storage. Once inside the host, as an obligate microaerophile, C. jejuni has been found in regions of the

GI tract with reduced oxygen tension such as the mucosal surface (Lee et al.

1986; Beery, Hugdahl, and Doyle 1988).

25 To support the growth under microaerobic conditions, C. jejuni employs a highly branched respiratory chain capable of using a variety of electron donors and acceptors (Hofreuter 2014; Sellars, Hall, and Kelly 2002). Under microaerobic conditions (5% CO2 and 10-12% O2 in N2 balance), C. jejuni is able to grow using fumarate, nitrate, nitrite, DMSO, and TMAO as electron acceptors

(Weingarten, Grimes, and Olson 2008; Sellars, Hall, and Kelly 2002).

Interestingly, in the presence of formate, C. jejuni is also capable of growing using nitrate, DMSO, and TMAO as electron acceptors under anaerobic conditions (5% CO2 and 10% H2 in N2 balance) (Weingarten, Grimes, and Olson

2008). Fumarate can also support growth under oxygen-limited conditions (0.3%

O2) (van der Stel et al. 2015). The preferential utilization for different electron acceptors is established through the RacRS two component signal transduction system (van der Stel et al. 2015; Brás et al. 1999; Apel et al. 2012). The sensor kinase RacS has a predicted periplasmic sensing domain while the response regulator RacR suppresses fumarate reduction in the presence of more favorable electron acceptors, nitrate and DMSO, by directly suppressing the transcription of

AspA, an that synthesizes fumarate from aspartate (van der Stel et al.

2015; Brás et al. 1999; Apel et al. 2012).

Mutants deficient in these respiratory pathways, or the RacR/RacS system, exhibited a significantly reduced adhesion and invasion in cultured cells

(Kassem et al. 2012; Kassem et al. 2014; Apel et al. 2012) and decreased bacterial burden in animals (Hitchcock et al. 2010; Weingarten, Grimes, and

26 Olson 2008). Transcriptional profiling experiments using day-of-hatch chicken

(Taveirne et al. 2013; Woodall et al. 2005) and rabbit ileal loop (Stintzi et al.

2005) models also support the role of respiration during C. jejuni colonization.

Genes encoding components of the electron transport chain and the terminal reductases were found up-regulated in vivo compared to in vitro growth conditions (Woodall et al. 2005; Taveirne et al. 2013; Stintzi et al. 2005). These studies strongly indicate a low oxygen environment during C. jejuni colonization and the ability for C. jejuni to maintain respiratory activity in response to reduced oxygen levels.

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe capable of causing haemorrhagic colitis. EHEC pathogenesis involves production of shiga-like toxins (Stx) as well as a type III secretion system (T3SS) and its effector proteins. These virulence factors are encoded by genes in a pathogenicity island, locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), which is regulated by a variety of regulators in response to various environmental conditions

(Rosenshine, Ruschkowski, and Finlay 1996; Kenny et al. 1997; Connolly, Finlay, and Roe 2015).

Both Stx production and T3SS secretion are modulated by oxygen levels.

In vitro, Stx production was enhanced under oxygen-limited or anaerobic

27 conditions in chemostat cultures (James and Keevil 1999a). In a vertical diffusion chamber model, translocation of Stx2 was enhanced during infections of polarized human colon epithelial T84 cells when the apical side was maintained under microaerobic conditions compared to aerobic conditions (Tran et al.

2014). Similarly, production of T3SS components, EspA and EspB, as well as the effector protein Tir (translocated intimin receptor) were increased during microaerobic infections in polarized T84 cells in the apical chamber (Schüller and

Phillips 2010a). These studies indicate that both prior exposure to reduced oxygen levels by bacteria as well as infections under reduced oxygen levels result in increased toxin production and T3SS functions. Anaerobic growth, specifically during respiration of nitrate or TMAO, but not fumarate or DMSO, also induced the production of EspB and Tir by EHEC strain Sakai (Ando et al.

2007). The critical role for respiration during infections is further supported by the observation that mutants lacking respiratory activities were out-competed by wild type bacteria during co-infections of Streptomycin-treated mice (Jones et al.

2007).

In oxygen-limiting or anaerobic conditions, EHEC typically exhibits enhanced adhesion to host cells. EHEC strain P2822 grown under oxygen- limiting or anaerobic conditions in chemostat exhibited increased adhesion to

HEp-2 cells (James and Keevil 1999a). EHEC strain TUV 93-0 also exhibited increased adhesion to polarized T84 cells cultured in a vertical diffusion chamber under microaerobic (1-2% atmospheric oxygen level) apical chamber (Schüller

28 and Phillips 2010a). Anaerobic growth of several non-motile EHEC isolates

(O157:NM strains) also exhibited enhanced adhesion to HCT-8 cells (Müsken et al. 2008a). However, the expression of the E. coli common pilus, which contributes to host cell adherence, was strongly expressed in response to 5%

CO2 but not anaerobicity (Rendón et al. 2007). Moreover, enhanced toxin production by growth in simulated ileal and colonic media was only observed under aerobic but not microaerobic conditions (Polzin et al. 2013). These data suggest an inherent sensitivity for the oxygen-responsive network underlying virulence regulation to be modulated by additional environmental factors.

Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is typically considered a microaerophilic organism and requires reduced oxygen levels for cultivation. When oxygen levels increase or decrease from the optimal microaerobic conditions, mutation frequency increases

(Park et al. 2004) and susceptibility to redox active drug metronidazole changes

(Gerrits et al. 2004; Martínez-Júlvez et al. 2012). However, this microaerophilic notion has been challenged. Comparison of transcriptional profiles of H. pylori under microaerobic (5% O2) or aerobic (20% O2) conditions show a notable up- regulation of genes in protein synthesis and nucleic acid metabolism in addition to redox processes that are induced likely to mediate oxidative stress under aerobic conditions (Kaakoush et al. 2009). Moreover, growth under atmospheric oxygen levels by H. pylori is possible at high cell density or in the presence of

29 elevated CO2 (Park, Ko, and Lee 2011; Bury-Moné et al. 2006). The reason behind the CO2 requirement for aerobic growth is not clear but, considering CO2 as a product formed from H. pylori neutralization of stomach acid with urease, these studies highlight a potential role for CO2 during pathogenesis.

Under conditions with oxygen levels either above or below the optimal microaerobic concentrations, H. pylori goes through a morphological transformation from bacillary cells to U-shaped and finally coccoid forms (Cellini,

Allocati, Di Campli, et al. 1994; Kusters et al. 1997; Tominaga et al. 1999; Donelli et al. 1998; Park et al. 2004). The coccoid H. pylori contains dramatic modifications in cell envelope (Costa et al. 1999; Shimomura et al. 2004) and likely maintains low levels of metabolic activities (Sörberg et al. 1996; Kusters et al. 1997; Mizoguchi et al. 1998). The exact role of the coccoid form in H. pylori pathogenesis has been difficult to establish. While the coccoid forms of H. pylori do not colonize gnotobiotic piglets (Eaton et al. 1995), they have been found in infected human gastrectomy specimens (Chan et al. 1994) and stomach mucosa of infected BALB/c mice (Cellini, Allocati, Angelucci, et al. 1994). Serological analyses identified coccoid-specific antigens in infected patients (Vijayakumari et al. 1995; Benaissa et al. 1996). During cell culture infections, coccoid forms of H. pylori have also been reported to exhibit adherence to a gastric carcinoma cell line (KATOIII) (Vijayakumari et al. 1995). However, cellular adhesion by coccoid forms of H. pylori is reduced compared to bacillary bacteria, resulting in reduced

NF-κB activation in HEK293T cells and IL-8 production in infected gastric

30 epithelial cells (Cole et al. 1997). Therefore, it is proposed that the coccoid form contributes to H. pylori subversion of immune surveillance during colonization and infection (Cellini 2014).

Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium capable of growing in the cytosol of a variety of mammalian cells. The intracellular life cycle of L. monocytogenes relies first on the ability of L. monocytogenes to gain access to the host cell cytosol through bacterial surface and secreted virulence factors.

Secondly, L. monocytogenes is capable of invading neighboring cells through actin-based motility, thus maintaining its intracellular residence without being exposed to extracellular immune surveillance. At an organismal level, L. monocytogenes survival in the gastrointestinal tract relies on its ability to resist acid (Smith, Liu, and Paoli 2013), bile salts (Begley et al. 2005; Dussurget et al.

2002; White et al. 2015; van der Veen and Abee 2011; Quillin, Schwartz, and

Leber 2011; Zhang et al. 2011; Dowd et al. 2011; Watson et al. 2009; Kim et al.

2006; Sleator et al. 2005), and likely other environmental stresses (Gahan and

Hill 2014; Lungu, Ricke, and Johnson 2009).

As a facultative anaerobe, L. monocytogenes is capable of growing under anaerobic conditions through mixed acid fermentation (Pine et al. 1989; Romick,

Fleming, and McFeeters 1996a). In addition to metabolic modifications (Müller-

31 Herbst et al. 2014a; Nilsson et al. 2013), anaerobic exposure also induces acid tolerance and bile salt resistance (Sewell, Allen, and Phillips 2015; White et al.

2015), that likely contribute to L. monocytogenes surviving and colonizing the intestines. Moreover, several studies have noted that anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibits enhanced adherence and invasion phenotype. First, transcriptional studies have shown that, internalins, which are surface proteins involved in adherence to host cells, were up-regulated in suboxic conditions

(Toledo-Arana et al. 2009; Müller-Herbst et al. 2014a; Jydegaard-Axelsen et al.

2004). Second, in both cell culture and animal infection models, anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibited an increased adhesion and invasion phenotype (Burkholder et al. 2009a; Andersen et al. 2007). At least one factor,

Listeria adhesion protein (LAP), is up-regulated under anaerobic condition and is required for the anaerobic induction of adhesion of cultured Caco-2 and HCT-8 cells (Burkholder et al. 2009a). However, the genetic network for anaerobic virulence regulation remains to be determined.

Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium

Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is a common foodborne pathogen that can cause gastroenteritis. S. Typhimurium pathogenesis involves two bacterial type III secretion systems that facilitate S.

Typhimurium invasion of the intestinal epithelium and survival in phagocytes (van der Heijden and Finlay 2012; Schlumberger and Hardt 2006). Several studies

32 have shown that S. Typhimurium adherence and invasion are induced under oxygen-limiting conditions (Lee and Falkow 1990; Ernst, Dombroski, and Merrick

1990; Schiemann and Shope 1991; Singh, Khullar, and Ganguly 2000). With as short as 3 hours of static incubation without agitation under aerobic conditions, the invasion of S. Typhimurium in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Epithelial (MDCK) cells was increased (Lee and Falkow 1990). S. Typhimurium grown aerobically with agitation or 20% O2 also exhibits the lowest invasion phenotype compared to those grown without agitation or with 0 or 1% O2 (Lee and Falkow 1990). With

HEp-2 cells, in contrast, aerobically or anaerobically grown S. Typhimurium exhibited similar invasion rates when infection was carried out under aerobic conditions. However, if infections were carried out under anaerobic conditions, anaerobically grown S. Typhimurium exhibited a stronger invasion phenotype

(Ernst, Dombroski, and Merrick 1990). Similar anaerobic induction of invasion was also reported using human Henle intestine 407 epithelial cells, mouse peritoneal cells (Schiemann and Shope 1991), spleen macrophages, and immobilized mucins (Singh, Khullar, and Ganguly 2000). In a rabbit ileal loop infection model, anaerobically grown S. Typhimurium also resulted in increased fluid accumulation compared with aerobically grown S. Typhimurium (Singh,

Khullar, and Ganguly 2000).

By carefully curating and comparing 15 completed S. enterica genomes,

Nuccio et al. identified that the genomes of gastrointestinal S. enterica pathogens are enriched with genes involved in anaerobic metabolism that can contribute to

33 intestinal colonization (Nuccio and Bäumler 2014). Two transcriptional regulators have been described to facilitate S. Typhimurium metabolic adaptations to anaerobic conditions. The global regulator Fnr controls the expression of over

36% of the coding sequences in response to anaerobic conditions (Fink et al.

2007), suppressing genes involved in aerobic metabolism while activating genes involved in anaerobic metabolism, flagella synthesis, and ethanolamine utilization

(Fink et al. 2007; Wei and Miller 1999). Interestingly, although Fnr is a negative regulator for the expression of hilA (Golubeva et al. 2012), which encodes the main transcriptional activator for Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1), the fnr mutant is more attenuated in mice compared to wildtype bacteria (Fink et al.

2007). In contrast, ArcA controls the expression of 44% of the coding sequences under anaerobic conditions, including suppression of some virulence genes

(Evans et al. 2011). However, the arcA mutant, despite exhibiting a reduced growth rate under anaerobic conditions, has no virulence defect in intraperitoneal or oral infections in mice (Evans et al. 2011). These studies demonstrate the complexity in anaerobic responses and highlight the importance of metabolic and physiological adaptation to anaerobicity for S. Typhimurium to establish infections.

Shigella flexneri

Shigella flexneri is a Gram-negative enteric pathogen and together with other 3 other Shigella species, S. dysenteriae, S. sonnei, and S. boydii, is

34 responsible for about half a million cases of shigellosis in the United States each year (Scallan et al. 2011a). The shigellosis disease is manifested with 5-7 days of diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain and is a result of the intestinal tissue destruction and inflammatory responses by Shigella infections (Sansonetti 2006).

S. flexneri is capable of invading and disseminating the intestinal epithelium

(Agaisse 2016; Bonnet and Tran Van Nhieu 2016; Yang et al. 2015; Valencia-

Gallardo, Carayol, and Tran Van Nhieu 2015) and replicates rapidly inside the host cell cytosol (Kentner et al. 2014). One of the virulence factors required for S. flexneri virulence is the type 3 secretion system (T3SS), encoded on a large virulence plasmid (Sansonetti, Kopecko, and Formal 1982; Le Gall et al. 2005).

The effector proteins secreted by T3SS contribute heavily to S. flexneri pathogenesis (Ogawa et al. 2008; Phalipon and Sansonetti 2007; Campbell-

Valois and Pontier 2016; Picking and Picking 2016; Ashida, Mimuro, and

Sasakawa 2015). The expression of T3SS and its effector proteins is induced at temperature higher than 32°C and the secretion is activated upon contact with host cells (Campbell-Valois and Pontier 2016). A seminal report further demonstrated a critical role for oxygen in the T3SS construction and activation in

S. flexneri (Marteyn et al. 2010). Specifically, after growth at a permissive temperature of 37°C, the length of the T3SS needle on S. flexneri was significantly longer under anaerobic conditions than aerobic conditions in an Fnr- dependent manner (Marteyn et al. 2010). As a result, exposure to the anaerobic lumen was hypothesized as a priming signal for S. flexneri for subsequent aerobic encountering of host cells (Marteyn et al. 2010).

35

The ability to respire oxygen is important for S. flexneri virulence. Mutants deficient in cytochrome bd oxidase are compromised in cell culture and animal models of infections (Way et al. 1999). In the absence of oxygen, S. flexneri up- regulates genes encoding processes contributing to anaerobic growth, such as fermentation, anaerobic respiration, and acid responses (Vergara-Irigaray et al.

2014). As expected, genes encoding components in aerobic processes, such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle, are down-regulated (Vergara-Irigaray et al. 2014).

The presence or absence of oxygen also plays a key role in the expression of iron acquisition systems (Carpenter and Payne 2014; Wei and Murphy 2016).

The genome of S. flexneri contains at least 4 different iron acquisition systems—

2 ferrous transporters, Feo and Sit, and 2 ferric transporters, (Iuc/IutA) and Fec (Wyckoff, Boulette, and Payne 2009). Two of the iron acquisition systems, encoded by iuc/iutA and sit genes, are expressed under aerobic conditions (Vergara-Irigaray et al. 2014; Boulette and Payne 2007). This is likely a result of an ArcA-dependent suppression under anaerobic conditions (Boulette and Payne 2007). In contrast, the feo system is expressed under anaerobic conditions, in an Fnr-dependent manner (Boulette and Payne 2007). These studies provide an important insight into the connection between metabolism and physiology with S. flexneri pathogenesis.

36

Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe and the causative agent for cholera, an acute diarrheal disease that can be fatal from severe dehydration. Vibrio species are able to grow anaerobically through mixed acid fermentation (Nobechi 1925; Unger, Rahman, and Demoss 1961) as well as respiration (Shi et al. 2006). Since 1977, it has been reported that anaerobically grown V. cholerae at 37°C exhibited a pleomorphic phenotype and increased cholera toxin production (Cobaxin et al. 2014; Fernandes, Clark, and Smith 1977;

Fernandes and Smith 1977). More recently, it was demonstrated that anaerobic growth using trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), not DMSO or fumarate, specifically induced anaerobic cholera toxin production likely through activation of stringent response (Lee et al. 2012; Oh et al. 2014; Oh et al. 2015). Using an infant mouse infection model, wildtype V. cholerae outcompeted mutant incapable of TMAO respiration (Oh et al. 2014) and while mutants either lacking or overproducing the intracellular stringent response signal ppGpp were attenuated (Oh et al. 2015).

V. cholerae from human stool samples not only outcompeted in vitro- grown bacteria in an infant mouse infection model (Merrell et al. 2002) but also exhibited increased transcript levels of genes involved in anaerobic growth

(Merrell et al. 2002; Bina et al. 2003). Using a rabbit ileal loop model to further

37 investigate V. cholerae in vivo transcriptional responses, higher expressions of genes involved in anaerobic metabolism were also identified (Xu, Dziejman, and

Mekalanos 2003). Multiple factors involved in colonization are also induced under anaerobic conditions (Marrero et al. 2009). Together, these studies strongly supported an anaerobic phase during V. cholerae infections. One of the known regulators involved in V. cholerae anaerobic responses is the transcription factor

AphB, which works with AphA and activates V. cholerae virulence regulatory cascade (Kovacikova and Skorupski 1999). AphB mainly responds to low pH and anaerobic conditions (Kovacikova, Lin, and Skorupski 2010; Taylor et al. 2012) and the activity of AphB is reversibly modulated by the presence and absence of oxygen through a cysteine residue (C235 in El Tor C6706) (Liu et al. 2011), which contributes to AphB dimerization under oxygen limiting conditions (Fan et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2011). In addition to AphAB, ArcA has also be found to play a role in the overall expression of ToxT, a key transcriptional activator for V. cholerae virulence genes (Sengupta, Paul, and Chowdhury 2003).

Yersinia enterocolitica

Yersinia enterocolitica is a Gram-negative pathogen typically transmitted through consumption of contaminated animal products. In the absence of oxygen, Y. enterocolitica is a mix acid fermenter and likely exhibits reduced TCA cycle activity based on a global transcriptional profiling study using a related organism, Y. intermedia (ATCC29909) (Babujee et al. 2013). Y. enterocolitica

38 virulence regulation responds strongly to a variety of environmental conditions

(Straley and Perry 1995; Chen, Thompson, and Francis 2016). Limited evidence also demonstrates a complex pathogenic response to different oxygen levels.

Expression of Ail, an adhesion protein, is down regulated under static growth at

37°C compared to aerobic, agitated growth (Pederson and Pierson 1995). Similar sub-oxic growth conditions also resulted in reduced invasion of Chinese hamster ovary cells and decreased resistance to serum killing (Pederson and Pierson

1995). In contrast, the expression of the invasin gene, inv, was not affected by anaerobic growth at 37°C. Moreover, expression of YplA, a phospholipase involved in pathogenesis, exhibited an increasing trend over growth conditions with increasing aeration (Schmiel, Young, and Miller 2000). These contrasting virulence gene responses indicate a complex behavior during Yersinia transit through the GI tract with fluctuating oxygen levels that remain to be determined.

Conclusion

It is clear that there is not a unifying response to fluctuating oxygen levels for all enteric pathogens. Within our limited selection of organisms, some, such as EHEC, L. monocytogenes, and S. Typhimurium, clearly exhibit enhanced adhesion or invasion of host cells, while others do not. Different electron acceptors for anaerobic respiration also exhibit different effects on virulence regulation. Even within the same organism, V. cholerae, despite multiple studies agree with the anaerobic induction of cholera toxin production, one study reports

39 the opposite observation where cholera toxin production is higher in aerobic but not anaerobic conditions (Krishnan et al. 2004). The variety of responses justify more in-depth investigations into potential cross-talks between oxygen-sensitive regulatory networks with pathways responsive to other environmental stimuli.

Moreover, the potential cross-talk strongly argues for a second and anaerobic look at the established virulence regulon of many well-studied transcription factors to reveal the connections between virulence regulation and pathogen physiology.

It is also important to consider the role of oxygen gradient and temporal exposure in enteric pathogenesis. In vitro growth in batch cultures does not realistically represent the oxygen gradient and temporal exposure experienced by enteric pathogens in vivo. Using chemostat for in vitro cultures, which can generate distinctive results from batch cultures (James and Keevil 1999a), may provide confirmation of batch culture findings and generate novel insight into the role of a dynamic system with systemic fluctuations in oxygen levels and temporal exposures. Similarly, cell culture infection models commonly used to determine the impact of oxygen levels on host-pathogen interactions should also incorporate oxygen gradient, similarly to a vertical diffusion chamber, across a polarized epithelium to better mimic the impact of oxygen gradient on both host cells and the pathogens.

In summary, enteric pathogens have complex and specific responses to fluctuating oxygen levels. Future research will enhance our understanding in

40 pathogen response during food processing and storage and gastrointestinal transit and colonization. These pieces of knowledge together will greatly improve our ability to control pathogen transmission and further reduce the medical and societal burden of foodborne infections.

References

Abbas, Amina Aicha, Stella Planchon, Michel Jobin, and Philippe Schmitt 2014 Absence of Oxygen Affects the Capacity to Sporulate and the Spore Properties of Bacillus Cereus. Food Microbiology 42: 122–131.

Agaisse, H., M. Gominet, O. A. Okstad, A. B. Kolstø, and D. Lereclus 1999 PlcR Is a Pleiotropic Regulator of Extracellular Virulence Factor Gene Expression in Bacillus Thuringiensis. Molecular Microbiology 32(5): 1043–1053.

Agaisse, Hervé 2016. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Shigella Flexneri Dissemination. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 29.

Albenberg, Lindsey, Tatiana V. Esipova, Colleen P. Judge, et al. 2014 Correlation between Intraluminal Oxygen Gradient and Radial

Al-Qadiri, Hamzah, Shyam S. Sablani, Mahmoudreza Ovissipour, et al. 2015 Effect of Oxygen Stress on Growth and Survival of Clostridium Perfringens, Campylobacter Jejuni, and Listeria Monocytogenes under Different Storage Conditions. Journal of Food Protection 78(4): 691–697.

Andersen, Jens Bo, Bent B. Roldgaard, Bjarke Bak Christensen, and Tine Rask Licht 2007 Oxygen Restriction Increases the Infective Potential of Listeria Monocytogenes in Vitro in Caco-2 Cells and in Vivo in Guinea Pigs. Bmc Microbiology 7: 55.

Ando, Hiroki, Hiroyuki Abe, Nakaba Sugimoto, and Toru Tobe 2007 Maturation of Functional Type III Secretion Machinery by Activation of Anaerobic Respiration in Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli. Microbiology (Reading, England) 153(Pt 2): 464–473.

Aoshi, Taiki, Javier A. Carrero, Vjollca Konjufca, et al. 2009 The Cellular Niche of Listeria Monocytogenes Infection Changes Rapidly in the Spleen. European Journal of Immunology 39(2): 417–425.

41

Apel, Dmitry, Jeremy Ellermeier, Mark Pryjma, Victor J. Dirita, and Erin C. Gaynor 2012 Characterization of Campylobacter Jejuni RacRS Reveals Roles in the Heat Shock Response, Motility, and Maintenance of Cell Length Homogeneity. Journal of Bacteriology 194(9): 2342–2354.

Arnesen, Lotte P. Stenfors, Annette Fagerlund, and Per Einar Granum 2008 From Soil to Gut: Bacillus Cereus and Its Food Poisoning Toxins. Fems Microbiology Reviews 32(4): 579–606.

Asai, K., S. H. Baik, Y. Kasahara, S. Moriya, and N. Ogasawara 2000 Regulation of the Transport System for C4-Dicarboxylic Acids in Bacillus Subtilis. Microbiology (Reading, England) 146 ( Pt 2): 263–271.

Ashida, Hiroshi, Hitomi Mimuro, and Chihiro Sasakawa 2015 Shigella Manipulates Host Immune Responses by Delivering Effector Proteins with Specific Roles. Frontiers in Immunology 6: 219.

Babakhani, F. K., G. A. Bradley, and L. A. Joens 1993 Newborn Piglet Model for Campylobacteriosis. Infection and Immunity 61(8): 3466–3475.

Babujee, Lavanya, Venkatesh Balakrishnan, Patricia J. Kiley, Jeremy D. Glasner, and Nicole T. Perna 2013 Transcriptome Changes Associated with Anaerobic Growth in Yersinia Intermedia (ATCC29909). PLOS ONE 8(10): e76567.

Backert, Steffen, Manja Boehm, Silja Wessler, and Nicole Tegtmeyer 2013 Transmigration Route of Campylobacter Jejuni across Polarized Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Paracellular, Transcellular or Both? Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS 11: 72.

Barrow, Paul Andrew, Angelo Berchieri, Oliveiro Caetano de Freitas Neto, and Margaret Lovell 2015 The Contribution of Aerobic and Anaerobic Respiration to Intestinal Colonization and Virulence for Salmonella Typhimurium in the Chicken. Avian Pathology 44(5): 401–407.

Beery, J. T., M. B. Hugdahl, and M. P. Doyle 1988 Colonization of Gastrointestinal Tracts of Chicks by Campylobacter Jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54(10): 2365–2370.

Begley, Máire, Roy D. Sleator, Cormac G. M. Gahan, and Colin Hill 2005 Contribution of Three Bile-Associated Loci, Bsh, Pva, and btlB, to

42 Gastrointestinal Persistence and Bile Tolerance of Listeria Monocytogenes. Infection and Immunity 73(2): 894–904.

Behari, J., and P. Youngman 1998 Regulation of Hly Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes by Carbon Sources and pH Occurs through Separate Mechanisms Mediated by PrfA. Infection and Immunity 66(8): 3635–3642.

Bekker, Martijn, Svetlana Alexeeva, Wouter Laan, et al. 2010 The ArcBA Two-Component System of Escherichia Coli Is Regulated by the Redox State of Both the Ubiquinone and the Menaquinone Pool. Journal of Bacteriology 192(3): 746–754.

Benaissa, M., P. Babin, N. Quellard, et al. 1996 Changes in Helicobacter Pylori Ultrastructure and Antigens during Conversion from the Bacillary to the Coccoid Form. Infection and Immunity 64(6): 2331–2335.

Beuchat, L. R. 1988 Thermal Tolerance of Talaromyces Flavus Ascospores as Affected by Growth Medium and Temperature, Age and Sugar Content in the Inactivation Medium. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 90(3): 359–364.

Bhat, Shakoor Ahmad, Malik Mehboob Willayat, Seuli Saha Roy, et al. 2013 Isolation, Molecular Detection and Antibiogram of Listeria Monocytogenes from Human Clinical Cases and Fish of Kashmir, India. Comparative Clinical Pathology 22(4): 661–665.

Bina, James, Jun Zhu, Michelle Dziejman, et al. 2003 ToxR Regulon of Vibrio Cholerae and Its Expression in Vibrios Shed by Cholera Patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(5): 2801–2806.

Bo Andersen, Jens, Bent B Roldgaard, Bjarke Bak Christensen, and Tine Rask Licht 2007 Oxygen Restriction Increases the Infective Potential of Listeria Monocytogenes in Vitro in Caco-2 Cells and in Vivo in Guinea Pigs. BMC Microbiology 7: 55.

Bonnet, Mariette, and Guy Tran Van Nhieu 2016 How Shigella Utilizes Ca(2+) Jagged Edge Signals during Invasion of Epithelial Cells. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 16.

Bottone, Edward J. 2010 Bacillus Cereus, a Volatile Human Pathogen. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 23(2): 382–398.

43

Boulette, Megan L., and Shelley M. Payne 2007 Anaerobic Regulation of Shigella Flexneri Virulence: ArcA Regulates Fur and Iron Acquisition Genes. Journal of Bacteriology 189(19): 6957–6967.

Brás, A. M., S. Chatterjee, B. W. Wren, D. G. Newell, and J. M. Ketley 1999 A Novel Campylobacter Jejuni Two-Component Regulatory System Important for Temperature-Dependent Growth and Colonization. Journal of Bacteriology 181(10): 3298–3302.

Brøndsted, Lone, Birgitte H. Kallipolitis, Hanne Ingmer, and Susanne Knöchel 2003 kdpE and a Putative RsbQ Homologue Contribute to Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes at High Osmolarity and Low Temperature. FEMS Microbiology Letters 219(2): 233–239.

Bruno, Joseph C., and Nancy E. Freitag 2010 Constitutive Activation of PrfA Tilts the Balance of Listeria Monocytogenes Fitness towards Life within the Host versus Environmental Survival. PloS One 5(12): e15138.

Buchanan, Robert L., Leon G. M. Gorris, Melinda M. Hayman, Timothy C. Jackson, and Richard C. Whiting 2017 A Review of Listeria Monocytogenes: An Update on Outbreaks, Virulence, Dose-Response, Ecology, and Risk Assessments. Food Control 75: 1–13.

Büla, C. J., J. Bille, and M. P. Glauser 1995 An Epidemic of Food-Borne Listeriosis in Western Switzerland: Description of 57 Cases Involving Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20(1): 66–72.

Burkholder, Kristin M., and Arun K. Bhunia 2010 Listeria Monocytogenes Uses Listeria Adhesion Protein (LAP) to Promote Bacterial Transepithelial Translocation and Induces Expression of LAP Receptor Hsp60. Infection and Immunity 78(12): 5062–5073.

Burkholder, Kristin M., Kwang-Pyo Kim, Krishna K. Mishra, et al. 2009 Expression of LAP, a SecA2-Dependent Secretory Protein, Is Induced under Anaerobic Environment. Microbes and Infection 11(10–11): 859–867.

Bury-Moné, Stephanie, Nadeem O. Kaakoush, Corinne Asencio, et al. 2006 Is Helicobacter Pylori a True Microaerophile? Helicobacter 11(4): 296– 303.

Campbell, Eric L., Walter J. Bruyninckx, Caleb J. Kelly, et al. 2014 Transmigrating Neutrophils Shape the Mucosal Microenvironment through

44 Localized Oxygen Depletion to Influence Resolution of Inflammation. Immunity 40(1): 66–77.

Campbell-Valois, F.-X., and Stéphanie M. Pontier 2016 Implications of Spatiotemporal Regulation of Shigella Flexneri Type Three Secretion Activity on Effector Functions: Think Globally, Act Locally. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 28.

Carpenter, Chandra, and Shelley M. Payne 2014 Regulation of Iron Transport Systems in Enterobacteriaceae in Response to Oxygen and Iron Availability. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 133: 110–117.

Cartwright, Emily J., Kelly A. Jackson, Shacara D. Johnson, et al. 2013 Listeriosis Outbreaks and Associated Food Vehicles, United States, 1998- 2008. Emerging Infectious Diseases 19(1): 1–9; quiz 184.

Cellini, L., N. Allocati, D. Angelucci, et al. 1994 Coccoid Helicobacter Pylori Not Culturable in Vitro Reverts in Mice. Microbiology and Immunology 38(11): 843–850.

Cellini, L., N. Allocati, E. Di Campli, and B. Dainelli 1994 Helicobacter Pylori: A Fickle Germ. Microbiology and Immunology 38(1): 25–30.

Cellini, Luigina 2014 Helicobacter Pylori: A Chameleon-like Approach to Life. World Journal of Gastroenterology 20(19): 5575–5582.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011 Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Associated with Jensen Farms Cantaloupe--United States, August-September 2011. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60(39): 1357–1358.

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 N.d. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172. 350, accessed August 1, 2018.

Chakraborty, T., M. Leimeister-Wächter, E. Domann, et al. 1992 Coordinate Regulation of Virulence Genes in Listeria Monocytogenes Requires the Product of the prfA Gene. Journal of Bacteriology 174(2): 568–574.

Chan, W. Y., P. K. Hui, K. M. Leung, et al. 1994 Coccoid Forms of Helicobacter Pylori in the Human Stomach. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 102(4): 503–507.

45

Chen, Shiyun, Karl M. Thompson, and Matthew S. Francis 2016 Environmental Regulation of Yersinia Pathophysiology. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773443/, accessed March 29, 2016.

Clair, Geremy, Alain Lorphelin, Jean Armengaud, and Catherine Duport 2013 OhrRA Functions as a Redox-Responsive System Controlling Toxinogenesis in Bacillus Cereus. Journal of Proteomics 94: 527–539.

Clair, Geremy, Stamatiki Roussi, Jean Armengaud, and Catherine Duport 2010 Expanding the Known Repertoire of Virulence Factors Produced by Bacillus Cereus through Early Secretome Profiling in Three Redox Conditions. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9(7): 1486–1498.

Cobaxin, Mayra, Haydee Martínez, Guadalupe Ayala, et al. 2014 Cholera Toxin Expression by El Tor Vibrio Cholerae in Shallow Culture Growth Conditions. Microbial Pathogenesis 66: 5–13.

Cole, S. P., D. Cirillo, M. F. Kagnoff, D. G. Guiney, and L. Eckmann 1997 Coccoid and Spiral Helicobacter Pylori Differ in Their Abilities to Adhere to Gastric Epithelial Cells and Induce Interleukin-8 Secretion. Infection and Immunity 65(2): 843–846.

Colgan, Sean P., and Cormac T. Taylor 2010 Hypoxia: An Alarm Signal during Intestinal Inflammation. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 7(5): 281–287.

Collins, Barry, Caitriona M. Guinane, Paul D. Cotter, Colin Hill, and R. Paul Ross 2012 Assessing the Contributions of the LiaS Histidine Kinase to the Innate Resistance of Listeria Monocytogenes to Nisin, Cephalosporins, and Disinfectants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78(8): 2923–2929.

Comes, Justin E., and Robert B. Beelman 2002 Addition of Fumaric Acid and Sodium Benzoate as an Alternative Method to Achieve a 5-Log Reduction of Escherichia Coli O157:H7 Populations in Apple Cider. Journal of Food Protection 65(3): 476–483.

Cone, Lawrence A., Millie M. Leung, Richard G. Byrd, et al. 2003 Multiple Cerebral Abscesses because of Listeria Monocytogenes: Three Case Reports and a Literature Review of Supratentorial Listerial Brain Abscess(es). Surgical Neurology 59(4): 320–328.

Conner, D. E., and L. R. Beuchat 1987 Efficacy of Media for Promoting Ascospore Formation by Neosartorya

46 Fischeri, and the Influence of Age and Culture Temperature on Heat Resistance of Ascospores. Food Microbiology 4(3): 229–238.

Connolly, James P. R., B. Brett Finlay, and Andrew J. Roe 2015 From Ingestion to Colonization: The Influence of the Host Environment on Regulation of the LEE Encoded Type III Secretion System in Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli. Frontiers in Microbiology 6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456613/, accessed April 5, 2016.

Cooper, G. J., K. M. Sherry, and J. A. Thorpe 1995 Changes in Gastric Tissue Oxygenation during Mobilisation for Oesophageal Replacement. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 9(3): 158–160; discussion 160.

Cossart, P., M. F. Vicente, J. Mengaud, et al. 1989 Listeriolysin O Is Essential for Virulence of Listeria Monocytogenes: Direct Evidence Obtained by Gene Complementation. Infection and Immunity 57(11): 3629–3636.

Costa, K., G. Bacher, G. Allmaier, et al. 1999 The Morphological Transition of Helicobacter Pylori Cells from Spiral to Coccoid Is Preceded by a Substantial Modification of the Cell Wall. Journal of Bacteriology 181(12): 3710–3715.

Cotter, Paul D., Cormac G. M. Gahan, and Colin Hill 2001 A Glutamate Decarboxylase System Protects Listeria Monocytogenes in Gastric Fluid. Molecular Microbiology 40(2): 465–475.

Cotter, Paul D., Caitriona M. Guinane, and Colin Hill 2002 The LisRK Signal Transduction System Determines the Sensitivity of Listeria Monocytogenes to Nisin and Cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46(9): 2784–2790.

Declerck, Nathalie, Laurent Bouillaut, Denis Chaix, et al. 2007 Structure of PlcR: Insights into Virulence Regulation and Evolution of Quorum Sensing in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(47): 18490–18495.

Donelli, G., P. Matarrese, C. Fiorentini, et al. 1998 The Effect of Oxygen on the Growth and Cell Morphology of Helicobacter Pylori. FEMS Microbiology Letters 168(1): 9–15.

Dons, Lone, Emma Eriksson, Yuxuan Jin, et al. 2004 Role of Flagellin and the Two-Component CheA/CheY System of Listeria

47 Monocytogenes in Host Cell Invasion and Virulence. Infection and Immunity 72(6): 3237–3244.

Dowd, Georgina C., Susan A. Joyce, Colin Hill, and Cormac G. M. Gahan 2011 Investigation of the Mechanisms by Which Listeria Monocytogenes Grows in Porcine Gallbladder Bile. Infection and Immunity 79(1): 369–379.

Dumont, J., and Cotuni, L. 1921 Bacilte Semblable a Celui Du Rouget de Pore Rencontre Dans Le L. C. R. D’uu Meningitique. (1921) 625-633. Ann. Inst. 35: 625–633.

Duport, Catherine, Séverine Thomassin, Gérald Bourel, and Philippe Schmitt 2004 Anaerobiosis and Low Specific Growth Rates Enhance Hemolysin BL Production by Bacillus Cereus F4430/73. Archives of Microbiology 182(1): 90– 95.

Duport, Catherine, Assia Zigha, Eric Rosenfeld, and Philippe Schmitt 2006 Control of Enterotoxin Gene Expression in Bacillus Cereus F4430/73 Involves the Redox-Sensitive ResDE Signal Transduction System. Journal of Bacteriology 188(18): 6640–6651.

Dussurget, Olivier, Didier Cabanes, Pierre Dehoux, et al. 2002 Listeria Monocytogenes Bile Salt Hydrolase Is a PrfA-Regulated Virulence Factor Involved in the Intestinal and Hepatic Phases of Listeriosis. Molecular Microbiology 45(4): 1095–1106.

Dykes, G. A., and S. M. Moorhead 2000 Survival of Osmotic and Acid Stress by Listeria Monocytogenes Strains of Clinical or Meat Origin. International Journal of Food Microbiology 56(2–3): 161– 166.

Eaton, K. A., C. E. Catrenich, K. M. Makin, and S. Krakowka 1995 Virulence of Coccoid and Bacillary Forms of Helicobacter Pylori in Gnotobiotic Piglets. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 171(2): 459–462.

Engel, P., R. Krämer, and G. Unden 1992 Anaerobic Fumarate Transport in Escherichia Coli by an Fnr-Dependent Dicarboxylate Uptake System Which Is Different from the Aerobic Dicarboxylate Uptake System. Journal of Bacteriology 174(17): 5533–5539.

Ernst, R. K., D. M. Dombroski, and J. M. Merrick 1990 Anaerobiosis, Type 1 Fimbriae, and Growth Phase Are Factors That Affect Invasion of HEp-2 Cells by Salmonella Typhimurium. Infection and Immunity 58(6): 2014–2016.

Esbelin, Julia, Jean Armengaud, Assia Zigha, and Catherine Duport

48 2009 ResDE-Dependent Regulation of Enterotoxin Gene Expression in Bacillus Cereus: Evidence for Multiple Modes of Binding for ResD and Interaction with Fnr. Journal of Bacteriology 191(13): 4419–4426.

Esbelin, Julia, Yves Jouanneau, Jean Armengaud, and Catherine Duport 2008 ApoFnr Binds as a Monomer to Promoters Regulating the Expression of Enterotoxin Genes of Bacillus Cereus. Journal of Bacteriology 190(12): 4242– 4251.

Esbelin, Julia, Yves Jouanneau, and Catherine Duport 2012 Bacillus Cereus Fnr Binds a [4Fe-4S] Cluster and Forms a Ternary Complex with ResD and PlcR. Bmc Microbiology 12: 125.

Evans, Matthew R, Ryan C Fink, Andres Vazquez-Torres, et al. 2011 Analysis of the ArcA Regulon in Anaerobically Grown Salmonella Enterica Sv. Typhimurium. BMC Microbiology 11: 58.

Fan, Fenxia, Zhi Liu, Nusrat Jabeen, et al. 2014 Enhanced Interaction of Vibrio Cholerae Virulence Regulators TcpP and ToxR under Oxygen-Limiting Conditions. Infection and Immunity 82(4): 1676– 1682.

Feehily, Conor, Conor P. O’Byrne, and Kimon Andreas G. Karatzas 2013 Functional γ-Aminobutyrate Shunt in Listeria Monocytogenes: Role in Acid Tolerance and Succinate Biosynthesis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79(1): 74–80.

Fernandes, P. B., J. M. Clark, and H. L. Smith 1977 Morphology of Vibrio Cholerae during Enterotoxin Production under Anaerobic Conditions. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 58(3): 252–260.

Fernandes, P. B., and H. L. Smith 1977 The Effect of Anaerobiosis and Bile Salts on the Growth and Toxin Production by Vibrio Cholerae. Journal of General Microbiology 98(1): 77–86.

Fink, Ryan C., Matthew R. Evans, Steffen Porwollik, et al. 2007 FNR Is a Global Regulator of Virulence and Anaerobic Metabolism in Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium (ATCC 14028s). Journal of Bacteriology 189(6): 2262–2273.

Flanary, P. L., R. D. Allen, L. Dons, and S. Kathariou 1999 Insertional Inactivation of the Listeria Monocytogenes cheYA Abolishes Response to Oxygen Gradients and Reduces the Number of Flagella. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45(8): 646–652.

Fleming et al.

49 1985 Pasteurized Milk as a Vehicle of Infection in an Outbreak of Listeriosis | NEJM. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198502143120704, accessed September 11, 2018.

Gahan, Cormac G. M., and Colin Hill 2014 Listeria Monocytogenes: Survival and Adaptation in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 4: 9.

Gaillard, J. L., P. Berche, C. Frehel, E. Gouin, and P. Cossart 1991 Entry of L. Monocytogenes into Cells Is Mediated by Internalin, a Repeat Protein Reminiscent of Surface Antigens from Gram-Positive Cocci. Cell 65(7): 1127–1141.

Georgellis, D., O. Kwon, and E. C. Lin 2001 Quinones as the Redox Signal for the Arc Two-Component System of Bacteria. Science (New York, N.Y.) 292(5525): 2314–2316.

Gerrits, Monique M., Egbert-Jan van der Wouden, Dorine A. Bax, et al. 2004 Role of the rdxA and frxA Genes in Oxygen-Dependent Metronidazole Resistance of Helicobacter Pylori. Journal of Medical Microbiology 53(Pt 11): 1123–1128.

Gilbreth, Stefanie Evans, Andrew K. Benson, and Robert W. Hutkins 2004 Catabolite Repression and Virulence Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes. Current Microbiology 49(2): 95–98.

Gilois, Nathalie, Nalini Ramarao, Laurent Bouillaut, et al. 2007 Growth-Related Variations in the Bacillus Cereus Secretome. Proteomics 7(10): 1719–1728.

Gilot, P., A. Genicot, and P. André 1996 Serotyping and Esterase Typing for Analysis of Listeria Monocytogenes Populations Recovered from Foodstuffs and from Human Patients with Listeriosis in Belgium. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(4): 1007–1010.

Glaser, P., L. Frangeul, C. Buchrieser, et al. 2001 Comparative Genomics of Listeria Species. Science 294(5543): 849–852.

Godshall, Casey E., Gina Suh, and Bennett Lorber 2013 Cutaneous Listeriosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51(11): 3591–3596.

Gohar, Michel, Karoline Faegri, Stéphane Perchat, et al. 2008 The PlcR Virulence Regulon of Bacillus Cereus. PloS One 3(7): e2793.

Gohar, Michel, Ole Andreas Økstad, Nathalie Gilois, et al. 2002 Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis Analysis of the Extracellular Proteome

50 of Bacillus Cereus Reveals the Importance of the PlcR Regulon. Proteomics 2(6): 784–791.

Golby, Paul, David J. Kelly, John R. Guest, and Simon C. Andrews 1998 Transcriptional Regulation and Organization of the dcuA and dcuB Genes, Encoding Homologous Anaerobic C4-Dicarboxylate Transporters in Escherichia Coli. Journal of Bacteriology 180(24): 6586–6596.

Golubeva, Yekaterina A., Adam Y. Sadik, Jeremy R. Ellermeier, and James M. Slauch 2012 Integrating Global Regulatory Input into the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 Type III Secretion System. Genetics 190(1): 79–90.

Gosset, Guillermo, Zhongge Zhang, Samir Nayyar, William A. Cuevas, and Milton H. Saier 2004 Transcriptome Analysis of Crp-Dependent Catabolite Control of Gene Expression in Escherichia Coli. Journal of Bacteriology 186(11): 3516–3524.

Gottschalk, Sanne, Iver Bygebjerg-Hove, Mette Bonde, et al. 2008 The Two-Component System CesRK Controls the Transcriptional Induction of Cell Envelope-Related Genes in Listeria Monocytogenes in Response to Cell Wall-Acting Antibiotics. Journal of Bacteriology 190(13): 4772– 4776.

Gray, C. T., J. W. Wimpenny, and M. R. Mossman 1966 Regulation of Metabolism in Facultative Bacteria. II. Effects of Aerobiosis, Anaerobiosis and Nutrition on the Formation of Krebs Cycle in Escherichia Coli. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 117(1): 33–41.

Gray, M L, and A H Killinger 1966 Listeria Monocytogenes and Listeric Infections. Bacteriological Reviews 30(2): 309–382.

Gunsalus, Rp, and Sj Park 1994 Aerobic-Anaerobic Gene-Regulation in Escherichia-Coli - Control by the Arcab and Fnr Regulons. Research in Microbiology 145(5–6): 437–450.

Hall, Jason A., and Ana M. Pajor 2005 Functional Characterization of a Na+-Coupled Dicarboxylate Carrier Protein from Staphylococcus Aureus. Journal of Bacteriology 187(15): 5189– 5194.

Hamon, Mélanie Anne, David Ribet, Fabrizia Stavru, and Pascale Cossart 2012 Listeriolysin O: The Swiss Army Knife of Listeria. Trends in Microbiology 20(8): 360–368.

51

Han, Hesong, Thomas Sullivan, and Adam C. Wilson 2015 Cytochrome c551 and the Cytochrome c Maturation Pathway Affect Virulence Gene Expression in Bacillus Cereus ATCC 14579. Journal of Bacteriology 197(3): 626–635.

Hayrapetyan, Hasmik, Marcel Tempelaars, Masja Nierop Groot, and Tjakko Abee 2015 Bacillus Cereus ATCC 14579 RpoN (Sigma 54) Is a Pleiotropic Regulator of Growth, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Motility, Biofilm Formation and Toxin Production. PloS One 10(8): e0134872.

Hayward, Matthew R., Manal AbuOun, Martin J. Woodward, and Vincent A. A. Jansen 2015 Temperature and Oxygen Dependent Metabolite Utilization by Salmonella Enterica Serovars Derby and Mbandaka. PLOS ONE 10(3): e0120450.

Hazeleger, W. C., J. A. Wouters, F. M. Rombouts, and T. Abee 1998 Physiological Activity of Campylobacter Jejuni Far below the Minimal Growth Temperature. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64(10): 3917– 3922.

He, G., R. A. Shankar, M. Chzhan, et al. 1999 Noninvasive Measurement of Anatomic Structure and Intraluminal Oxygenation in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Living Mice with Spatial and Spectral EPR Imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(8): 4586–4591. van der Heijden, Joris, and B. Brett Finlay 2012 Type III Effector-Mediated Processes in Salmonella Infection. Future Microbiology 7(6): 685–703. de las Heras, Aitor, Robert J. Cain, Magdalena K. Bieleckal, and Jose A. Vazquez-Boland 2011 Regulation of Listeria Virulence: PrfA Master and Commander. Current Opinion in Microbiology 14(2): 118–127.

Hernandez-Milian, Almudena, and Antoni Payeras-Cifre 2014 What Is New in Listeriosis? BioMed Research International 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005144/.

Hilbi, Hubert, Stefan S. Weber, Curdin Ragaz, Yves Nyfeler, and Simon Urwyler 2007 Environmental Predators as Models for Bacterial Pathogenesis. Environmental Microbiology 9(3): 563–575.

Hitchcock, Andrew, Stephen J. Hall, Jonathan D. Myers, et al. 2010 Roles of the Twin-Arginine Translocase and Associated Chaperones in

52 the Biogenesis of the Electron Transport Chains of the Human Pathogen Campylobacter Jejuni. Microbiology (Reading, England) 156(Pt 10): 2994–3010.

Hoffmann, Sandra, Michael B. Batz, and J. Glenn Morris 2012 Annual Cost of Illness and Quality-Adjusted Life Year Losses in the United States due to 14 Foodborne Pathogens. Journal of Food Protection 75(7): 1292– 1302.

Hofreuter, Dirk 2014 Defining the Metabolic Requirements for the Growth and Colonization Capacity of Campylobacter Jejuni. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 4: 137.

Huhtanen, C. N., J. I. Feinberg, H. Trenchard, and J. G. Phillips 1983 Acid Enhancement of Clostridium Botulinum Inhibition in Ham and Bacon Prepared with Potassium Sorbate and Sorbic Acid. Journal of Food Protection 46(9): 807–810.

Huynen, M. A., T. Dandekar, and P. Bork 1999 Variation and Evolution of the Citric-Acid Cycle: A Genomic Perspective. Trends in Microbiology 7(7): 281–291.

Islam, Mir N. 1982 Inhibition of Mold in Bread By Dimethyl Fumarate. Journal of Food Science 47(5): 1710–1712.

Iverson, Tina M., César Luna-Chavez, Gary Cecchini, and Douglas C. Rees 1999 Structure of the Escherichia Coli Fumarate Reductase Respiratory Complex. Science 284(5422): 1961–1966.

James, B. W., and C. W. Keevil 1999a Influence of Oxygen Availability on Physiology, Verocytotoxin Expression and Adherence of Escherichia Coli O157. Journal of Applied Microbiology 86(1): 117–124. 1999b Influence of Oxygen Availability on Physiology, Verocytotoxin Expression and Adherence of Escherichia Coli O157. Journal of Applied Microbiology 86(1): 117–124.

Janausch, I. G, E Zientz, Q. H Tran, A Kröger, and G Unden 2002 C4-Dicarboxylate Carriers and Sensors in Bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1553(1): 39–56.

Jantsch, Jonathan, and Johannes Schödel 2015 Hypoxia and Hypoxia-Inducible Factors in Myeloid Cell-Driven Host Defense and Tissue Homeostasis. Immunobiology 220(2): 305–314.

53

J.H. Harvey Pirie 1940 Listeria: Change of Name for a Genus Bacteria | Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/145264a0, accessed September 4, 2018.

Jones, Shari A., Fatema Z. Chowdhury, Andrew J. Fabich, et al. 2007 Respiration of Escherichia Coli in the Mouse Intestine. Infection and Immunity 75(10): 4891–4899.

Jydegaard-Axelsen, Anne-Marie, Poul Erik Høiby, Kim Holmstrøm, Nicholas Russell, and Susanne Knøchel 2004 CO2- and Anaerobiosis-Induced Changes in Physiology and Gene Expression of Different Listeria Monocytogenes Strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70(7): 4111–4117.

Kaakoush, Nadeem O., Claudia Baar, Joanna Mackichan, et al. 2009 Insights into the Molecular Basis of the Microaerophily of Three Campylobacterales: A Comparative Study. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 96(4): 545–557.

Kader, A. A., D. Zagory, and E. L. Kerbel 1989 Modified Atmosphere Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 28(1): 1–30.

Kallipolitis, B. H., and H. Ingmer 2001 Listeria Monocytogenes Response Regulators Important for Stress Tolerance and Pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204(1): 111–115.

Kallipolitis, Birgitte H., Hanne Ingmer, Cormac G. Gahan, Colin Hill, and Lotte Søgaard-Andersen 2003 CesRK, a Two-Component Signal Transduction System in Listeria Monocytogenes, Responds to the Presence of Cell Wall-Acting Antibiotics and Affects Beta-Lactam Resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47(11): 3421–3429.

Karhausen, Jörn, Glenn T. Furuta, John E. Tomaszewski, et al. 2004 Epithelial Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Is Protective in Murine Experimental Colitis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 114(8): 1098–1106.

Kassem, Issmat I., Rosario A. Candelero-Rueda, Kawthar A. Esseili, and Gireesh Rajashekara 2017 Formate Simultaneously Reduces Oxidase Activity and Enhances Respiration in Campylobacter Jejuni. Scientific Reports 7: 40117.

Kassem, Issmat I., Mahesh Khatri, Malak A. Esseili, et al. 2012 Respiratory Proteins Contribute Differentially to Campylobacter Jejuni’s

54 Survival and in Vitro Interaction with Hosts’ Intestinal Cells. BMC Microbiology 12: 258.

Kassem, Issmat I., Mahesh Khatri, Yasser M. Sanad, et al. 2014 The Impairment of Methylmenaquinol:fumarate Reductase Affects Hydrogen Peroxide Susceptibility and Accumulation in Campylobacter Jejuni. MicrobiologyOpen 3(2): 168–181.

Kenny, B, A Abe, M Stein, and B B Finlay 1997 Enteropathogenic Escherichia Coli Protein Secretion Is Induced in Response to Conditions Similar to Those in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Infection and Immunity 65(7): 2606–2612.

Kentner, David, Giuseppe Martano, Morgane Callon, et al. 2014 Shigella Reroutes Host Cell Central Metabolism to Obtain High-Flux Nutrient Supply for Vigorous Intracellular Growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(27): 9929–9934.

Kim, Hyun-Jin, Meghna Mittal, and Abraham L. Sonenshein 2006 CcpC-Dependent Regulation of citB and lmo0847 in Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 188(1): 179–190.

Kim, So Hyun, Lisa Gorski, James Reynolds, et al. 2006 Role of uvrA in the Growth and Survival of Listeria Monocytogenes under UV Radiation and Acid and Bile Stress. Journal of Food Protection 69(12): 3031– 3036.

Kirk, Martyn D., Sara M. Pires, Robert E. Black, et al. 2015 World Health Organization Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 22 Foodborne Bacterial, Protozoal, and Viral Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLoS Medicine 12(12): e1001921.

Körner, Heinz, Heidi J. Sofia, and Walter G. Zumft 2003 Phylogeny of the Bacterial Superfamily of Crp-Fnr Transcription Regulators: Exploiting the Metabolic Spectrum by Controlling Alternative Gene Programs. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 27(5): 559–592.

Kovacikova, Gabriela, Wei Lin, and Karen Skorupski 2010 The LysR-Type Virulence Activator AphB Regulates the Expression of Genes in Vibrio Cholerae in Response to Low pH and Anaerobiosis. Journal of Bacteriology 192(16): 4181–4191.

Kovacikova, Gabriela, and Karen Skorupski 1999 A Vibrio Cholerae LysR Homolog, AphB, Cooperates with AphA at the tcpPH Promoter To Activate Expression of the ToxR Virulence Cascade. Journal of Bacteriology 181(14): 4250–4256.

55

Krishnan, H. H., Amalendu Ghosh, Kalidas Paul, and Rukhsana Chowdhury 2004 Effect of Anaerobiosis on Expression of Virulence Factors in Vibrio Cholerae. Infection and Immunity 72(7): 3961–3967.

Kuo, Cheng-Ju, Sin-Tian Wang, Chia-Mei Lin, et al. 2018 A Multi-Omic Analysis Reveals the Role of Fumarate in Regulating the Virulence of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli. Cell Death & Disease 9(3): 381.

Kusters, J. G., M. M. Gerrits, J. A. Van Strijp, and C. M. Vandenbroucke-Grauls 1997 Coccoid Forms of Helicobacter Pylori Are the Morphologic Manifestation of Cell Death. Infection and Immunity 65(9): 3672–3679.

Lampidis, R., R. Gross, Z. Sokolovic, W. Goebel, and J. Kreft 1994 The Virulence Regulator Protein of Listeria Ivanovii Is Highly Homologous to PrfA from Listeria Monocytogenes and Both Belong to the Crp-Fnr Family of Transcription Regulators. Molecular Microbiology 13(1): 141–151.

Laouami, Sabrina, Geremy Clair, Jean Armengaud, and Catherine Duport 2014 Proteomic Evidences for Rex Regulation of Metabolism in Toxin- Producing Bacillus Cereus ATCC 14579. Plos One 9(9): e107354.

Larsen, Marianne H., Birgitte H. Kallipolitis, Janne K. Christiansen, John E. Olsen, and Hanne Ingmer 2006 The Response Regulator ResD Modulates Virulence Gene Expression in Response to Carbohydrates in Listeria Monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 61(6): 1622–1635.

Le Gall, Tony, Maria Mavris, Maria Celeste Martino, et al. 2005 Analysis of Virulence Plasmid Gene Expression Defines Three Classes of Effectors in the Type III Secretion System of Shigella Flexneri. Microbiology (Reading, England) 151(Pt 3): 951–962.

Lee, A., J. L. O’Rourke, P. J. Barrington, and T. J. Trust 1986 Mucus Colonization as a Determinant of Pathogenicity in Intestinal Infection by Campylobacter Jejuni: A Mouse Cecal Model. Infection and Immunity 51(2): 536–546.

Lee, C A, and S Falkow 1990 The Ability of Salmonella to Enter Mammalian Cells Is Affected by Bacterial Growth State. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87(11): 4304–4308.

Lee, Kang-Mu, Yongjin Park, Wasimul Bari, et al. 2012 Activation of Cholera Toxin Production by Anaerobic Respiration of

56 Trimethylamine N-Oxide in Vibrio Cholerae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 287(47): 39742–39752.

Lee, Seung Yuan, Seung Jae Lee, Dong Soo Choi, and Sun Jin Hur 2015 Current Topics in Active and Intelligent Food Packaging for Preservation of Fresh Foods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95(14): 2799– 2810.

Leimeister-Wächter, M., E. Domann, and T. Chakraborty 1991 Detection of a Gene Encoding a Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase C That Is Co-Ordinately Expressed with Listeriolysin in Listeria Monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 5(2): 361–366.

Linnan, M. J., L. Mascola, X. D. Lou, et al. 1988 Epidemic Listeriosis Associated with Mexican-Style Cheese. The New England Journal of Medicine 319(13): 823–828.

Liu, Zhi, Menghua Yang, Gregory L. Peterfreund, et al. 2011 Vibrio Cholerae Anaerobic Induction of Virulence Gene Expression Is Controlled by Thiol-Based Switches of Virulence Regulator AphB. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(2): 810– 815.

Lobel, Lior, Nadejda Sigal, Ilya Borovok, et al. 2015 The Metabolic Regulator CodY Links Listeria Monocytogenes Metabolism to Virulence by Directly Activating the Virulence Regulatory Gene prfA. Molecular Microbiology 95(4): 624–644.

Lungu, B., S. C. Ricke, and M. G. Johnson 2009 Growth, Survival, Proliferation and Pathogenesis of Listeria Monocytogenes under Low Oxygen or Anaerobic Conditions: A Review. Anaerobe 15(1–2): 7–17.

Lyautey, Emilie, David R. Lapen, Graham Wilkes, et al. 2007 Distribution and Characteristics of Listeria Monocytogenes Isolates from Surface Waters of the South Nation River Watershed, Ontario, Canada. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73(17): 5401–5410.

Maier, R. J., A. Olczak, S. Maier, S. Soni, and J. Gunn 2004 Respiratory Hydrogen Use by Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium Is Essential for Virulence. Infection and Immunity 72(11): 6294–6299.

Malpica, Roxana, Bernardo Franco, Claudia Rodriguez, Ohsuk Kwon, and Dimitris Georgellis 2004 Identification of a Quinone-Sensitive Redox Switch in the ArcB Sensor

57 Kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(36): 13318–13323.

Marrero, Karen, Aniel Sánchez, Arielis Rodríguez-Ulloa, et al. 2009 Anaerobic Growth Promotes Synthesis of Colonization Factors Encoded at the Vibrio Pathogenicity Island in Vibrio Cholerae El Tor. Research in Microbiology 160(1): 48–56.

Marteyn, Benoit, Nicholas P. West, Douglas F. Browning, et al. 2010 Modulation of Shigella Virulence in Response to Available Oxygen in Vivo. Nature 465(7296): 355–358.

Martínez-Júlvez, Marta, Adriana L. Rojas, Igor Olekhnovich, et al. 2012 Structure of RdxA--an Oxygen-Insensitive Nitroreductase Essential for Metronidazole Activation in Helicobacter Pylori. The FEBS Journal 279(23): 4306–4317.

McLauchlin, J. 1990 Distribution of Serovars of Listeria Monocytogenes Isolated from Different Categories of Patients with Listeriosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 9(3): 210–213.

Mengaud, Jérôme, Hélène Ohayon, Pierre Gounon, René-Marc Mège, and Pascale Cossart 1996 E-Cadherin Is the Receptor for Internalin, a Surface Protein Required for Entry of L. Monocytogenes into Epithelial Cells. Cell 84(6): 923–932.

Menguad et al. 1991 Pleiotropic Control of Listeria Monocytogenes Virulence Factors by a Gene That Is Autoregulated - Mengaud - 1991 - Molecular Microbiology - Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365- 2958.1991.tb02158.x, accessed October 2, 2018.

Merrell, D. Scott, Susan M. Butler, Firdausi Qadri, et al. 2002 Host-Induced Epidemic Spread of the Cholera Bacterium. Nature 417(6889): 642–645.

Messaoudi, Kahina, Thierry Clavel, Philippe Schmitt, and Catherine Duport 2010 Fnr Mediates Carbohydrate-Dependent Regulation of Catabolic and Enterotoxin Genes in Bacillus Cereus F4430/73. Research in Microbiology 161(1): 30–39.

Milenbachs, A. A., D. P. Brown, M. Moors, and P. Youngman 1997 Carbon-Source Regulation of Virulence Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 23(5): 1075–1085.

58

Mittal, Meghna, Kieran B. Pechter, Silvia Picossi, et al. 2013 Dual Role of CcpC Protein in Regulation of Aconitase Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes and Bacillus Subtilis. Microbiology (Reading, England) 159(Pt 1): 68–76.

Mittal, Meghna, Silvia Picossi, and Abraham L. Sonenshein 2009 CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 191(3): 862–872.

Mizoguchi, H., T. Fujioka, K. Kishi, et al. 1998 Diversity in Protein Synthesis and Viability of Helicobacter Pylori Coccoid Forms in Response to Various Stimuli. Infection and Immunity 66(11): 5555– 5560.

Müller-Herbst, Stefanie, Stefanie Wüstner, Anna Mühlig, et al. 2014Identification of Genes Essential for Anaerobic Growth of Listeria

Murphy, C., C. Carroll, and K. N. Jordan 2006 Environmental Survival Mechanisms of the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter Jejuni. Journal of Applied Microbiology 100(4): 623–632.

Murray, E. G. D., R. A. Webb, and M. B. R. Swann 1926 A Disease of Rabbits Characterised by a Large Mononuclear Leucocytosis, Caused by a Hitherto Undescribed Bacillus Bacterium Monocytogenes (N.sp.). The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 29(4): 407– 439.

Müsken, Anne, Martina Bielaszewska, Lilo Greune, et al. 2008a Anaerobic Conditions Promote Expression of Sfp Fimbriae and Adherence of Sorbitol-Fermenting Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:NM to Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(4): 1087–1093. 2008b Anaerobic Conditions Promote Expression of Sfp Fimbriae and Adherence of Sorbitol-Fermenting Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:NM to Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(4): 1087–1093.

Nakano, M. M., P. Zuber, and A. L. Sonenshein 1998 Anaerobic Regulation of Bacillus Subtilis Krebs Cycle Genes. Journal of Bacteriology 180(13): 3304–3311.

Nicholson, Wayne L. 2008 The Bacillus Subtilis ydjL (bdhA) Gene Encodes Acetoin Reductase/2,3- Butanediol Dehydrogenase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(22): 6832–6838.

59

Nielsen, Pia Kiil, Ann Zahle Andersen, Maarten Mols, et al. 2012 Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiling of the Cell Envelope Stress Response and the Role of LisRK and CesRK in Listeria Monocytogenes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 158(Pt 4): 963–974.

Nilsson, Rolf E., Tom Ross, John P. Bowman, and Margaret L. Britz 2013 MudPIT Profiling Reveals a Link between Anaerobic Metabolism and the Alkaline Adaptive Response of Listeria Monocytogenes EGD-E. PloS One 8(1): e54157.

Nobechi, K. 1925 Contributions to the knowledge of vibrio cholerae i. Fermentation of carbohydrates and polyatomic alcohols by vibrio cholerae. Journal of Bacteriology 10(3): 197–215.

Nuccio, Sean-Paul, and Andreas J. Bäumler 2014 Comparative Analysis of Salmonella Genomes Identifies a Metabolic Network for Escalating Growth in the Inflamed Gut. mBio 5(2): e00929-914.

Ogawa, Michinaga, Yutaka Handa, Hiroshi Ashida, Masato Suzuki, and Chihiro Sasakawa 2008 The Versatility of Shigella Effectors. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 6(1): 11–16.

Oh, Young Taek, Kang-Mu Lee, Wasimul Bari, et al. 2015 Cholera Toxin Production Induced upon Anaerobic Respiration Is Suppressed by Glucose Fermentation in Vibrio Cholerae. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Oh, Young Taek, Yongjin Park, Mi Young Yoon, et al. 2014 Cholera Toxin Production during Anaerobic Trimethylamine N-Oxide Respiration Is Mediated by Stringent Response in Vibrio Cholerae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 289(19): 13232–13242.

Ooi, Say Tat, and Bennett Lorber 2005 Gastroenteritis due to Listeria Monocytogenes. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 40(9): 1327–1332.

Ough, C. S., and R. E. Kunkee 1974 The Effect of Fumaric Acid on Malo-Lactic Fermentation in Wines from Warm Areas. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 25(4): 188–190.

Park, Ah-Mee, Quan Li, Kumiko Nagata, et al.

60 2004 Oxygen Tension Regulates Reactive Oxygen Generation and Mutation of Helicobacter Pylori. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 36(9): 1126–1133.

Park, Shin Ae, Ara Ko, and Na Gyong Lee 2011 Stimulation of Growth of the Human Gastric Pathogen Helicobacter Pylori by Atmospheric Level of Oxygen under High Carbon Dioxide Tension. BMC Microbiology 11: 96.

Pederson, K. J., and D. E. Pierson 1995 Ail Expression in Yersinia Enterocolitica Is Affected by Oxygen Tension. Infection and Immunity 63(10): 4199–4201.

Penner, J. L. 1988 The Genus Campylobacter: A Decade of Progress. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1(2): 157–172.

Phalipon, Armelle, and Philippe J. Sansonetti 2007 Shigella’s Ways of Manipulating the Host Intestinal Innate and Adaptive Immune System: A Tool Box for Survival? Immunology and Cell Biology 85(2): 119–129.

Picking, Wendy L., and William D. Picking 2016 The Many Faces of IpaB. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 12.

Pine, L., G. B. Malcolm, J. B. Brooks, and M. I. Daneshvar 1989 Physiological Studies on the Growth and Utilization of Sugars by Listeria Species. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 35(2): 245–254.

Pittman, Roland N. 2011 Oxygen Transport. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54103/, accessed July 18, 2018.

Podolak, R. K., J. F. Zayas, C. L. Kastner, and D. Y. C. Fung 1996 Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes and Escherichia Coli O157:H7 on Beef by Application of Organic Acids. Journal of Food Protection 59(4): 370–373.

Polzin, Sabrina, Claudia Huber, Eva Eylert, et al. 2013 Growth Media Simulating Ileal and Colonic Environments Affect the Intracellular Proteome and Carbon Fluxes of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:H7 Strain EDL933. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79(12): 3703– 3715.

Pöntinen, Anna, Annukka Markkula, Miia Lindström, and Hannu Korkeala 2015 Two-Component-System Histidine Kinases Involved in Growth of Listeria

61 Monocytogenes EGD-E at Low Temperatures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81(12): 3994–4004.

Portnoy, Daniel A., Victoria Auerbuch, and Ian J. Glomski 2002 The Cell Biology of Listeria Monocytogenes Infection. The Journal of Cell Biology 158(3): 409–414.

Quillin, Sarah J., Kierstyn T. Schwartz, and Jess H. Leber 2011 The Novel Listeria Monocytogenes Bile Sensor BrtA Controls Expression of the Cholic Acid Efflux Pump MdrT. Molecular Microbiology 81(1): 129–142.

Rasmussen, O. F., P. Skouboe, L. Dons, L. Rossen, and J. E. Olsen 1995 Listeria Monocytogenes Exists in at Least Three Evolutionary Lines: Evidence from Flagellin, Invasive Associated Protein and Listeriolysin O Genes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 141 ( Pt 9): 2053–2061.

Rauch, Marcus, Qin Luo, Stefanie Müller-Altrock, and Werner Goebel 2005 SigB-Dependent in Vitro Transcription of prfA and Some Newly Identified Genes of Listeria Monocytogenes Whose Expression Is Affected by PrfA in Vivo. Journal of Bacteriology 187(2): 800–804.

Reents, Heike, Richard Münch, Thorben Dammeyer, Dieter Jahn, and Elisabeth Härtig 2006 The Fnr Regulon of Bacillus Subtilis. Journal of Bacteriology 188(3): 1103–1112.

Rendón, María A., Zeus Saldaña, Ayşen L. Erdem, et al. 2007 Commensal and Pathogenic Escherichia Coli Use a Common Pilus Adherence Factor for Epithelial Cell Colonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(25): 10637–10642.

Ripio, M. T., K. Brehm, M. Lara, M. Suárez, and J. A. Vázquez-Boland 1997 Glucose-1-Phosphate Utilization by Listeria Monocytogenes Is PrfA Dependent and Coordinately Expressed with Virulence Factors. Journal of Bacteriology 179(22): 7174–7180.

Romick, T. L., and H. P. Fleming 1998 Acetoin Production as an Indicator of Growth and Metabolic Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Applied Microbiology 84(1): 18–24.

Romick, T. L., H. P. Fleming, and R. F. McFeeters 1996a Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes in Defined Glucose Medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(1): 304– 307.

62 1996b Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes in Defined Glucose Medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(1): 304– 307.

Rosenfeld, E., C. Duport, A. Zigha, and P. Schmitt 2005 Characterization of Aerobic and Anaerobic Vegetative Growth of the Food- Borne Pathogen Bacillus Cereus F4430/73 Strain. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 51(2): 149–158.

Rosenshine, I, S Ruschkowski, and B B Finlay 1996 Expression of Attaching/Effacing Activity by Enteropathogenic Escherichia Coli Depends on Growth Phase, Temperature, and Protein Synthesis upon Contact with Epithelial Cells. Infection and Immunity 64(3): 966–973.

Sansonetti, P. J., D. J. Kopecko, and S. B. Formal 1982 Involvement of a Plasmid in the Invasive Ability of Shigella Flexneri. Infection and Immunity 35(3): 852–860.

Sansonetti, Philippe J. 2006 Rupture, Invasion and Inflammatory Destruction of the Intestinal Barrier by Shigella: The Yin and Yang of Innate Immunity. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien Des Maladies Infectieuses et de La Microbiologie Médicale / AMMI Canada 17(2): 117–119. de Sarrau, Benoît, Thierry Clavel, Caroline Clerté, et al. 2012 Influence of Anaerobiosis and Low Temperature on Bacillus Cereus Growth, Metabolism, and Membrane Properties. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78(6): 1715–1723.

Scallan, Elaine, Robert M. Hoekstra, Frederick J. Angulo, et al. 2011a Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States--Major Pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17(1): 7–15. 2011b Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17(1): 7–15.

Schär, Jennifer, Regina Stoll, Kristina Schauer, et al. 2010 Pyruvate Carboxylase Plays a Crucial Role in Carbon Metabolism of Extra- and Intracellularly Replicating Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 192(7): 1774–1784.

Schiemann, D. A., and S. R. Shope 1991 Anaerobic Growth of Salmonella Typhimurium Results in Increased Uptake by Henle 407 Epithelial and Mouse Peritoneal Cells in Vitro and Repression of a Major Outer Membrane Protein. Infection and Immunity 59(1): 437–440.

63

Schlech, W. F. 2000 Foodborne Listeriosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 31(3): 770–775.

Schlumberger, Markus C., and Wolf-Dietrich Hardt 2006 Salmonella Type III Secretion Effectors: Pulling the Host Cell’s Strings. Current Opinion in Microbiology 9(1): 46–54.

Schmiel, D. H., G. M. Young, and V. L. Miller 2000 The Yersinia Enterocolitica Phospholipase Gene yplA Is Part of the Flagellar Regulon. Journal of Bacteriology 182(8): 2314–2320.

Schüller, Stephanie, and Alan D. Phillips 2010 Microaerobic Conditions Enhance Type III Secretion and Adherence of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli to Polarized Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Environmental Microbiology 12(9): 2426–2435.

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of Fumaric Acid as a Feed Additive for All Animal Species 2013 EFSA Journal 11(2): 3102.

Seeliger, H. P. R., and K. Höhne 1979 Chapter II Serotyping of Listeria Monocytogenes and Related Species. In Methods in Microbiology. T. Bergan and J. R. Norris, eds. Pp. 31–49. Academic Press. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0580951708703726.

Sellars, M. J., S. J. Hall, and D. J. Kelly 2002 Growth of Campylobacter Jejuni Supported by Respiration of Fumarate, Nitrate, Nitrite, Trimethylamine-N-Oxide, or Dimethyl Sulfoxide Requires Oxygen. Journal of Bacteriology 184(15): 4187–4196.

Sengupta, Nilanjan, Kalidas Paul, and Rukhsana Chowdhury 2003 The Global Regulator ArcA Modulates Expression of Virulence Factors in Vibrio Cholerae. Infection and Immunity 71(10): 5583–5589.

Sewell, Danny, Stuart CH Allen, and Carol A. Phillips 2015 Oxygen Limitation Induces Acid Tolerance and Impacts Simulated Gastro- Intestinal Transit in Listeria Monocytogenes J0161. Gut Pathogens 7(1): 11.

Shah, Mihir V., Oscar van Mastrigt, Joseph J. Heijnen, and Walter M. van Gulik 2015 Transport and Metabolism of Fumaric Acid in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Aerobic Glucose-Limited Chemostat Culture. Yeast 33(4): 145–161.

Sheehan, B., A. Klarsfeld, T. Msadek, and P. Cossart 1995 Differential Activation of Virulence Gene Expression by PrfA, the Listeria

64 Monocytogenes Virulence Regulator. Journal of Bacteriology 177(22): 6469– 6476.

Shehade, Hussein, Guillaume Oldenhove, and Muriel Moser 2014 Hypoxia in the Intestine or Solid Tumors: A Beneficial or Deleterious Alarm Signal? European Journal of Immunology 44(9): 2550–2557.

Shen, Yang, Monica Naujokas, Morag Park, and Keith Ireton 2000 InlB-Dependent Internalization of Listeria Is Mediated by the Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase. Cell 103(3): 501–510.

Sheridan, W. G., R. H. Lowndes, and H. L. Young 1990 Intraoperative Tissue Oximetry in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract. American Journal of Surgery 159(3): 314–319.

Shi, Jing, Pedro R. Romero, Gary K. Schoolnik, Alfred M. Spormann, and Peter D. Karp 2006 Evidence Supporting Predicted Metabolic Pathways for Vibrio Cholerae: Gene Expression Data and Clinical Tests. Nucleic Acids Research 34(8): 2438– 2444.

Shimomura, Hirofumi, Shunji Hayashi, Kenji Yokota, Keiji Oguma, and Yoshikazu Hirai 2004 Alteration in the Composition of Cholesteryl Glucosides and Other Lipids in Helicobacter Pylori Undergoing Morphological Change from Spiral to Coccoid Form. FEMS Microbiology Letters 237(2): 407–413.

Singh, R. D., M. Khullar, and N. K. Ganguly 2000 Role of Anaerobiosis in Virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 215(1–2): 39–46.

Six, S., S. C. Andrews, G. Unden, and J. R. Guest 1994 Escherichia Coli Possesses Two Homologous Anaerobic C4- Dicarboxylate Membrane Transporters (DcuA and DcuB) Distinct from the Aerobic Dicarboxylate Transport System (Dct). Journal of Bacteriology 176(21): 6470–6478.

Slamti, Leyla, and Didier Lereclus 2002 A Cell–cell Signaling Peptide Activates the PlcR Virulence Regulon in Bacteria of the Bacillus Cereus Group. The EMBO Journal 21(17): 4550–4559.

Sleator, Roy D., Henrike H. Wemekamp-Kamphuis, Cormac G. M. Gahan, Tjakko Abee, and Colin Hill 2005 A PrfA-Regulated Bile Exclusion System (BilE) Is a Novel Virulence Factor in Listeria Monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 55(4): 1183–1195.

65

Smith, James L., Yanhong Liu, and George C. Paoli 2013 How Does Listeria Monocytogenes Combat Acid Conditions? Canadian Journal of Microbiology 59(3): 141–152.

Sörberg, M., M. Nilsson, H. Hanberger, and L. E. Nilsson 1996 Morphologic Conversion of Helicobacter Pylori from Bacillary to Coccoid Form. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 15(3): 216–219.

Spencer, M. E., and J. R. Guest 1987 Regulation of Citric Acid Cycle Genes in Facultative Bacteria. Microbiological Sciences 4(6): 164–168.

Spindler, E. C., J. D. F. Hale, T. H. Giddings, R. E. W. Hancock, and R. T. Gill 2011 Deciphering the Mode of Action of the Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptide Bac8c. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 55(4): 1706–1716.

Spiro, S. 1994 The FNR Family of Transcriptional Regulators. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 66(1–3): 23–36.

Spiro, S., and Jr Guest 1990 Fnr and Its Role in Oxygen-Regulated Gene-Expression in Escherichia- Coli. Fems Microbiology Letters 75(4): 399–428. van Spreeuwel, J. P., G. C. Duursma, C. J. Meijer, et al. 1985 Campylobacter Colitis: Histological Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Findings. Gut 26(9): 945–951. van der Stel, Anne-Xander, Andries van Mourik, Linda Heijmen-van Dijk, et al. 2015 The Campylobacter Jejuni RacRS System Regulates Fumarate Utilization in a Low Oxygen Environment. Environmental Microbiology 17(4): 1049–1064.

Stintzi, Alain, Denver Marlow, Kiran Palyada, et al. 2005 Use of Genome-Wide Expression Profiling and Mutagenesis to Study the Intestinal Lifestyle of Campylobacter Jejuni. Infection and Immunity 73(3): 1797– 1810.

Straley, S. C., and R. D. Perry 1995 Environmental Modulation of Gene Expression and Pathogenesis in Yersinia. Trends in Microbiology 3(8): 310–317.

Summa, Claudia, and Sandra A N Walker 2010 Endocarditis Due to Listeria Monocytogenes in an Academic Teaching

66 Hospital: Case Report. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 63(4): 312– 314.

Swaminathan, Bala, and Peter Gerner-Smidt 2007 The Epidemiology of Human Listeriosis. Microbes and Infection 9(10): 1236–1243.

Taveirne, Michael E., Casey M. Theriot, Jonathan Livny, and Victor J. DiRita 2013 The Complete Campylobacter Jejuni Transcriptome during Colonization of a Natural Host Determined by RNAseq. PloS One 8(8): e73586.

Taylor, Jennifer L., Rukman S. De Silva, Gabriela Kovacikova, et al. 2012 The Crystal Structure of AphB, a Virulence Gene Activator from Vibrio Cholerae, Reveals Residues That Influence Its Response to Oxygen and pH. Molecular Microbiology 83(3): 457–470.

Thønnings, S., J. D. Knudsen, H. C. Schønheyder, et al. 2016 Antibiotic Treatment and Mortality in Patients with Listeria Monocytogenes Meningitis or Bacteraemia. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 22(8): 725–730.

Toledo-Arana, Alejandro, Olivier Dussurget, Georgios Nikitas, et al. 2009 The Listeria Transcriptional Landscape from Saprophytism to Virulence. Nature 459(7249): 950–956.

Tominaga, K., N. Hamasaki, T. Watanabe, et al. 1999 Effect of Culture Conditions on Morphological Changes of Helicobacter Pylori. Journal of Gastroenterology 34 Suppl 11: 28–31.

Tran, Seav-Ly, Lucile Billoud, Steven B. Lewis, Alan D. Phillips, and Stephanie Schüller 2014 Shiga Toxin Production and Translocation during Microaerobic Human Colonic Infection with Shiga Toxin-Producing E. Coli O157:H7 and O104:H4. Cellular Microbiology 16(8): 1255–1266.

Trivett, T. L., and E. A. Meyer 1971 Citrate Cycle and Related Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 107(3): 770–779.

Uhlich, Gaylen A., Laura D. Wonderling, and John B. Luchansky 2006 Analyses of the Putative Crp/Fnr Family of Transcriptional Regulators of a Serotype 4b Strain of Listeria Monocytogenes. Food Microbiology 23(3): 300– 306.

Unden, G., and J. Bongaerts

67 1997 Alternative Respiratory Pathways of Escherichia Coli: Energetics and Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Electron Acceptors. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics 1320(3): 217–234.

Unger, L., A. K. Rahman, and R. D. Demoss 1961 Anaerobic Dissimilation of Glucose by Vibrio Comma. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 7: 844–847.

USDA ERS - Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses N.d. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne- illnesses/, accessed April 23, 2018.

Valencia-Gallardo, Cesar M., Nathalie Carayol, and Guy Tran Van Nhieu 2015 Cytoskeletal Mechanics during Shigella Invasion and Dissemination in Epithelial Cells. Cellular Microbiology 17(2): 174–182.

Vázquez-Boland, José A., Michael Kuhn, Patrick Berche, et al. 2001 Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 14(3): 584–640. van der Veen, Stijn, and Tjakko Abee 2011 Contribution of Listeria Monocytogenes RecA to Acid and Bile Survival and Invasion of Human Intestinal Caco-2 Cells. International Journal of Medical Microbiology: IJMM 301(4): 334–340.

Vergara-Irigaray, Marta, Maria C. Fookes, Nicholas R. Thomson, and Christoph M. Tang 2014 RNA-Seq Analysis of the Influence of Anaerobiosis and FNR on Shigella Flexneri. BMC Genomics 15: 438.

Vijayakumari, S., M. M. Khin, B. Jiang, and B. Ho 1995 The Pathogenic Role of the Coccoid Form of Helicobacter Pylori. Cytobios 82(331): 251–260.

Vivant, Anne-Laure, Dominique Garmyn, Laurent Gal, and Pascal Piveteau 2014 The Agr Communication System Provides a Benefit to the Populations of Listeria Monocytogenes in Soil. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 4: 160. van der Voort, M., and T. Abee 2009 Transcriptional Regulation of Metabolic Pathways, Alternative Respiration and Enterotoxin Genes in Anaerobic Growth of Bacillus Cereus ATCC 14579. Journal of Applied Microbiology 107(3): 795–804. van der Voort, Menno, Oscar P. Kuipers, Girbe Buist, Willem M. de Vos, and Tjakko Abee

68 2008 Assessment of CcpA-Mediated Catabolite Control of Gene Expression in Bacillus Cereus ATCC 14579. BMC Microbiology 8: 62.

Walker, S. J., P. Archer, and J. G. Banks 1990 Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes at Refrigeration Temperatures. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology 68(2): 157–162.

Wallace, Nathan, Eric Newton, Elizabeth Abrams, Ashley Zani, and Yvonne Sun 2017 Metabolic Determinants in Listeria Monocytogenes Anaerobic Listeriolysin O Production. Archives of Microbiology: 1–11.

Watson, Debbie, Roy D. Sleator, Pat G. Casey, Colin Hill, and Cormac G. M. Gahan 2009 Specific Osmolyte Transporters Mediate Bile Tolerance in Listeria Monocytogenes. Infection and Immunity 77(11): 4895–4904.

Way, S. S., S. Sallustio, R. S. Magliozzo, and M. B. Goldberg 1999 Impact of Either Elevated or Decreased Levels of Cytochrome Bd Expression on Shigella Flexneri Virulence. Journal of Bacteriology 181(4): 1229– 1237.

Wei, Y., and C. G. Miller 1999 Characterization of a Group of Anaerobically Induced, Fnr-Dependent Genes of Salmonella Typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology 181(19): 6092–6097.

Wei, Yahan, and Erin R. Murphy 2016 Shigella Iron Acquisition Systems and Their Regulation. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 18.

Weingarten, Rebecca A., Jesse L. Grimes, and Jonathan W. Olson 2008 Role of Campylobacter Jejuni Respiratory Oxidases and Reductases in Host Colonization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(5): 1367–1375.

Weis, J., and H. P. Seeliger 1975 Incidence of Listeria Monocytogenes in Nature. Applied Microbiology 30(1): 29–32.

Welshimer, H. J. 1960 Survival of Listeria Monocytogenes in Soil. Journal of Bacteriology 80: 316–320.

White, Sally J., Daniel M. McClung, Jessica G. Wilson, Brandy N. Roberts, and Janet R. Donaldson 2015 Influence of pH on Bile Sensitivity amongst Various Strains of Listeria Monocytogenes under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions. Journal of Medical Microbiology 64(11): 1287–1296.

69

Williams, Tatjana, Susanne Bauer, Dagmar Beier, and Michael Kuhn 2005 Construction and Characterization of Listeria Monocytogenes Mutants with in-Frame Deletions in the Response Regulator Genes Identified in the Genome Sequence. Infection and Immunity 73(5): 3152–3159.

Wing, Edward J., and Stephen H. Gregory 2002 Listeria Monocytogenes: Clinical and Experimental Update. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 185 Suppl 1: S18-24.

Woodall, C. A., M. A. Jones, P. A. Barrow, et al. 2005 Campylobacter Jejuni Gene Expression in the Chick Cecum: Evidence for Adaptation to a Low-Oxygen Environment. Infection and Immunity 73(8): 5278– 5285.

World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2004 Risk Assessment of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods: Technical Report. Rome: Rome : FAO. http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42875, accessed September 17, 2018.

Wyckoff, Elizabeth E., Megan L. Boulette, and Shelley M. Payne 2009 Genetics and Environmental Regulation of Shigella Iron Transport Systems. Biometals: An International Journal on the Role of Metal Ions in Biology, Biochemistry, and Medicine 22(1): 43–51.

Xu, Guoqiang, Xiulai Chen, Liming Liu, and Linghuo Jiang 2013 Fumaric Acid Production in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae by Simultaneous Use of Oxidative and Reductive Routes. Bioresource Technology 148: 91–96.

Xu, Qing, Michelle Dziejman, and John J. Mekalanos 2003 Determination of the Transcriptome of Vibrio Cholerae during Intraintestinal Growth and Midexponential Phase in Vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(3): 1286– 1291.

Yang, Shih-Chun, Chi-Feng Hung, Ibrahim A. Aljuffali, and Jia-You Fang 2015 The Roles of the Virulence Factor IpaB in Shigella Spp. in the Escape from Immune Cells and Invasion of Epithelial Cells. Microbiological Research 181: 43–51.

Zhang, Chaomei, Min Zhang, Jingliang Ju, et al. 2003 Genome Diversification in Phylogenetic Lineages I and II of Listeria Monocytogenes: Identification of Segments Unique to Lineage II Populations. Journal of Bacteriology 185(18): 5573–5584.

70

Zhang, Qiang, Yingying Feng, Lingfu Deng, et al. 2011 SigB Plays a Major Role in Listeria Monocytogenes Tolerance to Bile Stress. International Journal of Food Microbiology 145(1): 238–243.

Zigha, A., E. Rosenfeld, P. Schmitt, and C. Duport 2006 Anaerobic Cells of Bacillus Cereus F4430/73 Respond to Low Oxidoreduction Potential by Metabolic Readjustments and Activation of Enterotoxin Expression. Archives of Microbiology 185(3): 222–233.

Zigha, Assia, Eric Rosenfeld, Philippe Schmitt, and Catherine Duport 2007 The Redox Regulator Fnr Is Required for Fermentative Growth and Enterotoxin Synthesis in Bacillus Cereus F4430/73. Journal of Bacteriology 189(7): 2813–2824.

71 CHAPTER III

METABOLIC DETERMINANTS IN LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES ANAEROBIC

LISTERIOLYSIN O PRODUCTION

This work was originally published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Archives of Microbiology in 2017 with the following citation: Wallace, N., Newton, E.,

Abrams, E. et al. Arch Microbiol (2017) 199: 827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-

017-1355-4

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a human pathogen and a facultative anaerobe.

To better understand how anaerobic growth affects L. monocytogenes pathogenesis, we first showed that anaerobic growth led to decreased growth and changes in surface morphology. Moreover, compared to aerobically grown bacteria, anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes established higher level of invasion but decreased intracellular growth and actin polymerization in cultured cells. The production of listeriolysin O (LLO) was significantly lower in anaerobic cultures—a phenotype observed in wildtype and isogenic mutants lacking transcriptional regulators SigB or CodY or harboring a constitutively active PrfA.

72 To explore potential regulatory mechanisms, we established that addition of central carbon metabolism intermediates, such as acetate, citrate, fumarate, pyruvate, lactate, and succinate, led to an increase in LLO activity in the anaerobic culture supernatant. These results highlight the regulatory role of central carbon metabolism in L. monocytogenes pathogenesis under anaerobic conditions.

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen and a leading cause of death from foodborne illnesses. While immuno-competent individuals may develop mild gastroenteritis after ingestion of large amounts of L. monocytogenes, immuno-compromised individuals have a higher risk of developing systemic infections. These infections can cause more severe symptoms and lead to fatal outcomes despite early antibiotic treatments.

Therefore, there is a need to better understand L. monocytogenes behavior during transmission to develop effective strategies to prevent infections. Upon ingestion, L. monocytogenes transits through the gastrointestinal tract and must adapt to host lumenal conditions in order to establish infections. However, despite the fact that the intestinal lumen is characterized by varying degrees of oxygenation, most of our understanding of L. monocytogenes pathogenesis is based on research conducted under aerobic conditions. The extent and the

73 mechanism by which anaerobic exposure impacts L. monocytogenes pathogenesis is unclear.

As a facultative anaerobe, L. monocytogenes can grow under strict anaerobic conditions with altered carbon metabolism. Chemical analyses have shown that in the presence of oxygen, L. monocytogenes incompletely oxidizes glucose to acetate, lactate, and acetoin. In the absence of oxygen, L. monocytogenes produces lactate as its major fermentation product along with ethanol, formate, and carbon dioxide (Romick, Fleming, and McFeeters 1996;

Pine et al. 1989; Jydegaard-Axelsen et al. 2004; Romick and Fleming 1998).

Moreover, transcriptional analyses using L. monocytogenes strain EGD showed a decreased transcript level for genes encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase and those involved in acetoin synthesis under anaerobic conditions (Müller-Herbst et al. 2014a) (Müller-Herbst et al. 2014). Genes encoding phosphotransferases systems also exhibited differential transcript levels in response to suboxic conditions (Toledo-Arana et al. 2009). Together these studies suggest that oxygen levels play a key role in regulating carbon metabolism in L. monocytogenes. However, it is not clear whether or how these metabolic adaptations influence L. monocytogenes pathogenesis under anaerobic conditions.

L. monocytogenes is an intracellular pathogen capable of growing and spreading between the cytosol of mammalian host cells. Its ability to invade non- phagocytic cells contributes to invasion of intestinal epithelium and subsequent systemic infections. Available evidence suggests that anaerobic growth results in

74 an enhanced invasion phenotype (Burkholder et al. 2009; Bo Andersen et al.

2007). However, the subsequent intracellular growth in the aerobic host cytosol is not known. Moreover, the signals mediating the anaerobic effects on L. monocytogenes infection have not been established. In this study, to provide a better understanding of L. monocytogenes behavior under anaerobic conditions, we investigated how anaerobic growth and the associated signals from anaerobic metabolism affect L. monocytogenes pathogenesis

Materials and Methods:

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Culture of the wild-type and isogenic mutants of L. monocytogenes strain

10403s were grown from colonies on a freshly streaked BHI plate (<1 week old) at 37°C. Mutants used in this study include those with clean deletion in sigB

(∆sigB) and codY (∆codY) and one with a constitutively active PrfA (PrfA*)

(Bruno and Freitag 2010). All cultures were grown in filter-sterilized brain heart diffusion (BHI) media (Lot 4176589) to ensure consistency. Aerobic cultures were grown with agitation at 250 RPM to ensure adequate oxygen diffusion. Anaerobic cultures were grown in a temperature-controlled incubator inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory, Type A) with a nitrogenous atmosphere containing

2.5% hydrogen. Optical density (OD) was measured in an optically clear 96-well plate at 600 nm with a volume of 200 µL per well using a 96-well plate reader

75 (Biotek Synergy4). Supplements included sodium acetate (Fisher Scientific

BP334-500), sodium fumarate (Acros Organics AC21553-1000), sodium succinate (Acros Organics AC20874-5000), sodium citrate (Fisher Scientific

S279-500), acetoin (Acros Organics AC 41195-100), sodium pyruvate (Alfa

Aesar A11148), and lithium lactate (Acros Organics 413331000). All supplements were prepared as 1 M stock solutions in deionized water, filter-sterilized, and added directly to the media to the desired concentration before inoculation.

Measurement of lactate, acetoin, and ethanol concentrations

Supernatant lactate was measured using a commercially available enzymatic kit following the manufacturer’s suggested protocol (Fisher 50-489-

257). The Voges-Proskauer test (Nicholson 2008) was adapted to quantify acetoin production in the supernatant of overnight L. monocytogenes cultures.

Supernatant or standard (100 µL) was placed into a sterile micro-centrifuge tube followed by additions of 70 µL of .5% creatine monohydrate (Sigma C3630-

100G), 100 µL of 1-Napthol (Sigma N1000-10G), and 100 µL of 40% KOH

(Chempure 831-704) in 95% EtOH. Samples were centrifuged between each addition, and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes after the final addition. After incubation 200 µL of each sample was placed into a flat bottom

96-well plate and the absorbance was read at 560 nm. A standard curve was constructed to calculate the concentration of acetoin in culture supernatant

76 samples. Ethanol percentage was measured using a commercially available enzymatic kit following manufacturer’s suggested protocol (Fisher 50-489-254).

Transmission electron microscopy

Overnight aerobic and anaerobic cultures of L. monocytogenes were visualized using transmission electron microscopy. Bacterial cultures (3 mL) were spun down to collect pellets, which were first fixed using 2 mL of a 2% paraformaldehyde (Alfa Aesar 30525-89-4) and 2% glutaraldehyde (Alfa Aesar

111-30-8) in phosphate buffer solution for 24 hours at 4°C. Following fixation, cells were washed 3 times for 10 minutes in phosphate buffer. Washed cells were then post fixed using a 2% solution of OsO4 in phosphate buffer for 24 hours at 4°C. Following post fixation cells were stained with a 2% lead citrate in phosphate buffer solution at 4°C for 24 hours. After staining the cells were treated to a series of dehydrations in ethanol (30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%,

90%, 95%, 100%) each for 10 minutes. The dehydrated cells were then embedded in API-PON 812 epoxy resin monomer (SPI-CHEM 90529-77-4) and dried for 24 hours at 70°C in an oven. The dried samples were sectioned using an ultra-microtome with a diamond blade to 100 nm sections. The sections were then embedded on lacy carbon grids and read using a Hitachi H-7600

Transmission Electron Microscope at 120kv. Measurements of cell envelope thickness were made using GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP).

77 Cell culture infection

The murine peritoneal macrophages RAW 264.7 (ATCC TIB-71), Caco-2 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (ATCC HTB-37), and LS174T mucin-secreting colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (ATCC CL-188) were grown in DMEM media

(Thermo Scientific SH30285.01) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (JRScientific REF 4365-500, Lot N056-6), HEPES (10 mM), and glutamine (2 mM) in a 37°C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Prior to infections, cells were seeded in a 24-well tissue culture plate and grown for 14-18 hours. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used for infections at an

MOI of 10. Bacteria diluted in cell culture medium were added to each well (500

µL) and incubated for 30 minutes. Following incubation media was aspirated and cells were washed twice with sterile DPBS. Fresh media (1 mL per well) containing 10 µg/mL gentamicin stock was added to each well. To enumerate intracellular bacteria, cell culture media was aspirated off and sterile 0.1% (v/v) triton X-100 was added to each well (200 µL per well) to lyse host cells. Lysates were diluted and spread on LB plates. Colonies on plates were counted using an automatic colony counter (Synbiosis aCOLyte 3) after 24-48 hours of incubation in a 37°C incubator.

78 Immunofluorescence microscopy

RAW264.7 macrophages were plated onto sterile coverslips (18 by 18 mm) inside 6-well plates at 1 million cells per well in the afternoon prior to infections. Overnight L. monocytogenes cultures were washed twice and diluted in cell culture media for infection at an MOI of 10. At 2 hpi, coverslips were fixed in paraformaldehyde (3.7% in PBS) overnight at 4°C. For immunofluorescence microscopy, each coverslip was washed with TBS-T (25 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM

NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100) and blocked with TBS-T with 1% bovine serum albumin

(BSA). Anti-Listeria serum (1:500 in TBS-T with 1% BSA; Thermo Scientific PA1-

30487) was added onto each coverslip and incubated at room temperature for one hour. Each coverslip was washed in 5 ml of TBS-T prior to incubation with secondary antibodies: phalloidin-iFluor 594 (1: 400, abcam ab176757) and

AlexaFluor 488–goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:400, abcam ab150077) in TBS-T with 1% BSA. One hundred intracellular bacteria per experimental replicate were scored for the presence or absence of actin clouds.

Hemolytic assays

Hemolytic assays were performed using overnight culture supernatant samples. Each sample was incubated at room temperature with 0.1 M DTT (5

µL) for 15 minutes. A positive control (0.4% triton X-100) and a negative control

(blank BHI media) were included for each experiment. After incubation, samples

79 were serially diluted using hemolysis buffer containing: dibasic sodium phosphate

(35 mM) and sodium chloride (125 mM) brought to pH 5.5 with acetic acid.

Defibrinated sheep’s blood (Hemostat Laboratories DSB050) was diluted to a hematocrit of 2% and then added to each sample for a final hematocrit of 1%.

Samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. After incubation, all samples were spun down at 2000 RPM for 5 minutes to pellet intact blood cells.

Supernatant lysate (120 µL) was transferred to a flat bottom 96-well plate for OD measurement at 541 nm as an indicator for LLO activity. Hemolytic unit was calculated as the inverse of the dilution factor at which half complete lysis occurred and subsequently normalized with original culture OD measured at absorbance at 600 nm. Samples that did not produce lysis at a level more than half of complete lysis were designated as “Below Detection” for their hemolytic units. Supernatant samples from anaerobic cultures typically generate activities at or slightly above “Below Detection” levels.

SDS-PAGE, silver staining, and immunoblotting

Samples from overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used for SDS-

PAGE and western blotting. Cultures were normalized by optical density (600 nm) using BHI media and centrifuged to separate supernatant and bacterial cell pellets. Supernatant samples were precipitated with 1% trichloroacetic acid at

4°C for 1 hour. Following precipitation, a cold acetone wash was performed. Both the pellet and supernatant samples were resuspended in 12 µL of 2x sample

80 buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min. The samples were then separated via SDS-

PAGE (8% acrylamide in the separating gel). Following SDS-PAGE, gels were either subjected to silver staining (Thermo Scientific 24612) following manufacturer’s protocol or proteins in gel were transferred to a PVDF membrane for subsequent immunoblotting using anti-LLO rabbit antibody (1:10,000, abcam ab43018) followed by goat-anti-rabbit HRP antibody (1:10,000, abcam ab6721).

Bands were visualized using chemilluminescent substrate (BIO-RAD 170-5060) and captured with x-ray films (WorldWide Medical Products 41101002).

Results

Characterization of anaerobic growth by Listeria monocytogenes strain

10403s

Current knowledge of anaerobic metabolism in L. monocytogenes is built from research using different laboratory strains (Pine et al. 1989; Romick,

Fleming, and McFeeters 1996; Müller-Herbst et al. 2014). Strain 10403s is widely used as a model organism, but its anaerobic metabolism has not been investigated. Therefore, we first monitored in vitro growth of strain 10403s in the presence or absence of oxygen in standard BHI medium. As expected for a facultative anaerobe, static growth in the absence of oxygen resulted in a lower maximal optical density compared to agitated aerobic growth (Fig. 1A).

Compared to aerobic growth, anaerobic growth of strain 10403s resulted in lower

81 pH, higher concentrations of ethanol and lactic acid, and no detectable levels of

acetoin (Table 1). Using TEM to visualize strain 10403s also highlighted a

morphological difference between aerobically and anaerobically grown cells (Fig.

1B, C). Anaerobically grown strain 10403s exhibited a notably increased space

between cytoplasm and the outer edge of the cells.

Figure 1. Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibits decreased maximal growth in vitro and morphological differences under TEM. AFigure Growth 3.1 cur vAnaerobicallyes of L. monoc ygrowntogene L.s s monocytogenestrain 10403s grown exhibits in BHI ar edecreased plotted on amaximal linear Y- axis to show the decreased magrowthximal O Din o vitrover 8 andh of gmorphologicalrowth. Averages differences of triplicates aunderre plo tTEMted w.i tAh eGrowthrror bar scurves repre sofen L.tin g the standard deviation and monocytogenesstatistics were pe strainrforme 10403sd using agrown two-ta inile BHId stu areden plottedt’s t test onwi tha slinearignific Ya-naxist diff etore shownces ithendic ated by asterisks (***p<.001). Adecreasederobically ( maximalB) or ana eODrob overically 8(C h) gofro growth.wn L. m oAveragesnocytoge nofe striplicates were visu arealiz eplottedd with T withEM. Serrorpac e between bars representing the standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed cytoplasm and outer edge of cells (n=10) was measured and shown under their respective images as averages±standard student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (***p < 0.001). Aerobically deviation (B) or anaerobically (C) grown L. monocytogenes were visualized with TEM. Space between cytoplasm and outer edge of cells (n = 10) was measured and shown under their respective images as averages ± standard deviation

82 Table 3.1: Characterizations of L. monocytogenes strain 10403s in vitro growth. Values shown are averages of triplicate  standard deviation a p values were calculated between aerobic and anaerobic samples using a two-tailed student’s t test

Culture Culture pH [Lactate] [Acetoin] [Ethanol] pH (Buffered (mM) (mM) (%) Figure 3.2 Anaerobic(BHI) growth BHI)of L. monocytogenes leads to increased initial intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localizationTable 3.1: Characterizations of L. monocytogenes Aerobic 5.41  6.57  0.01 0 1.37  0.22  strain 10403s in vitro growth. Values shown are0.14 averages of triplicate  standard deviation 0.51 0.000 Anaerobic 4.67  6.51  0.03 1.75  0 1.43  a p values were calculated0.12 between aerobic and anaerobic0.31 samples using a two0.002-tailed student’sP value ta test 0.002 0.48 0.009

Figure 3.2 Anaerobic growth of L. monocytogenes leads to increased initial intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localization. Cell Effectsculture infections of anaerobic were performed exposure with humanon cell colonic culture epithelial infections cell lines, Caco-2 (A) and LS174T (B), and with murine peritoneal macrophages, RAW264.7 (C, D). All infections were performed with MOI of 10 using aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Approximately 100 L. monocytogenes cells were counted for actin co- localization per infection condition at 2 hpi. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representingTo determine standard the deviation impact andof anaerobic statistics were growth performed on L. using monocytogenes a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, infections,***p < 0.001) we infected murine macrophages (RAW264.7) and human colonic epithelial cells (Caco-2 and LS174T) with overnight L. monocytogenes grown underFigure aerobic3.3 Anaerobically or anaerobic grown conditions. L. monocytogenes At 1 hpi, secretes there wasless LLOa significantlyFigure 3.2 higher Anaerobic growth of L. monocytogenes leads to increased initial intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localizationTable 3.1: intracellularCharacterizations CFU of in L both. monocytogenes Caco-2 (Fig. 2A) and LS174T (Fig. 2B) cells infected strain 10403s in vitro growth. withValues anaerobically shown are averages grown of L. triplicate monocytogenes  standard deviation compared to those infected with aerobicaa p values llywere grown calculated bacteria. between We aerobic also investigatedand anaerobic thesamples impact using of a anaerobic two-tailed growth student’s t test on infection stages beyond the initial invasion by monitoring intracellular growth of aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes in RAW264.7 macrophages.Figure 3.2 Anaerobic While growth there of was L. monocytogenes a higher intracellular leads to number increased of initial bacteria in intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localizationTable 3.1: Characterizations of L. monocytogenes macrophages strain 10403s in infected vitro growth with. anaerobically grown bacteria at 1 hpi, intracellular Values shown are averages of triplicate  standard deviation

a p values were calculated between aerobic and83 anaerobic samples using a two-tailed student’s t test growth by anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes was significantly reduced in later time points post infection (Fig. 2C). Because intracellular growth relies on L. monocytogenes escape from phagosomes into the cytosol, we enumerated the proportion of cytosolic bacteria by measuring actin co-localization at 2 hpi inside macrophages. L. monocytogenes grown under anaerobic conditions exhibited significantly compromised actin co-localization compared to those grown under aerobic conditions (Fig. 2D). These data suggest that anaerobic growth has a strong effect on the outcome of infections. Moreover, because all infections were performed under aerobic conditions, the observed differences between aerobically and anaerobically grown bacteria suggest that anaerobic exposure may have a long-term impact on subsequent interactions with host cells under aerobic conditions.

84

FigureFigur e3.2 2. AnaerobicAnaerobic growthgrowth o off L L.. m monocytogenesonocytogenes le aleadsds to itonc increasedreased init iinitialal intra intracellularcellular CFU but CFUdec butrea sdecreaseded intracel lintracellularular growth a ngrowthd actin cando-lo actincaliza cotio-nlocalization. Cell culture. Cellinfe cculturetions w infectionsere perfor mwereed w ith performedhuman c owithlon ichuman epithe coloniclial cell epitheliallines, Ca ccello-2 lines, (A) a nCacod LS-127 (4AT) (andB), a LS174Tnd with m(Bu),r iandne p witherito murineneal peritonealmacroph macrophages,ages, RAW26 4RAW264.7.7 (C, D). A (lC,l in Dfe).c tAllion infectionss were pe rwereform eperformedd with MO Iwith of 1MOI0 us ofin g10 a eusingrobic ally or aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Approximately 100 L. monocytogenes cells wereana countederobical lfory g ractinown Lco. m-localizationonocytoge pernes .infection Approxi mconditionately 10 at0 L 2. mhpi.on Averagesocytogene ofs ctriplicatesells were arecou nted for plottedactin cwitho-lo errorcaliz abarstion representingper infection cstandardondition deviationat 2 hpi. A andvera statisticsges of tr iwereplica tperformedes are plot tusinged wi tah twoerro-r bars tailedrepr estudent’ssenting st tatestnd awithrd d significanteviation a ndifferencesd statistics windicatedere perf obyrm asterisksed using (* ap tw < 0.05,o-taile **d spt u< 0.01,dent’s t test with ***spig < 0.001)nificant d ifferences indicated by asterisks (*p<0.001)

Figure 3.3 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes secretes less LLOFigure 3.2 Anaerobic Effectsgrowth of L.anaerobic monocytogenes growth leads on to LLO increased production initial intracellular CFU but decreased intracellular growth and actin co-localization. Cell culture infections were performed with human colonic epithelial cell lines, Caco-2 (A) and LS174T (B), and with murine peritoneal macrophages, RAW264.7 (C, D). All infections were performed with MOI of 10 using aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Approximately 100 L. monocytogenes cells were countedLLO for actinis a secretedco-localization hemolysin per infection and condition its pore at-form 2 hpi.ing Averages activity of contributes triplicates are to plotted L. with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed monocytogenesstudent’s t test with escape significant from differences phagosomes indicated to by the asterisks cytosol. (*p Therefore,< 0.05, **p < 0.01, based on ***p < 0.001)

85 Figure 3.3 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes secretes less LLO. A LLO activity is decreased in anaerobic culture supernatant compared to aerobic culture supernatant of wildtype strain 10403s and isogenic mutants. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test the infection phenotypes, we hypothesized that anaerobic growth, in contrast to enhancing invasion (Fig. 2A and 2B) (Burkholder et al. 2009; Bo Andersen et al.

2007), resulted in decreased LLO production. We tested supernatant samples from overnight aerobic or anaerobic cultures for LLO activities through hemolytic assays and found little to no detectable hemolytic activity in the anaerobic culture supernatant (Fig. 3A). Using immunoblotting and silver staining, it was clear that while anaerobic growth did not alter the overall protein abundance in the supernatant (Fig. 3B bottom), it resulted in a clear decrease in LLO abundance

(Fig. 3B top). Because LLO production can be regulated by multiple transcription factors PrfA, SigB, and CodY (de las Heras et al. 2011; Rauch et al. 2005; Lobel et al. 2015) we tested isogenic mutants lacking known transcriptional regulators

SigB (∆sigB) or CodY (∆codY) or harboring a constitutively active virulence master regulator PrfA (PrfA*) for their LLO production in response to anaerobic growth. While the PrfA* mutant exhibited higher levels of LLO production, all 3 mutants tested, similarly to wild type, produced significantly lower levels of LLO under anaerobic conditions compared to aerobic conditions (Fig. 3D). These results highlighted that LLO production is under strong regulation by the presence or absence of oxygen. Moreover, this anaerobic suppression of LLO production is not directly mediated by known virulence regulators PrfA, SigB, and

CodY.

86 A B SUP LYS * 160 rLLO ∆hly A AN A AN ** 3000

140 **

H y e

2500 ( t

120 %

) m

i **

T

v

** A

o

i t

100 e l

W 2000

y

c

r

t

o

c

A

i

i

c

80 b

b

c

i

i 1500

A

c

o

t

r

c y

60 W

l

e

t

i

o

A T

1000 v

i )

m 40

%

t

( e y

H 20 500 0 0 WT ∆sigB ∆codY prfA*

Figure 3.3 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes secretes less LLO. A LLO activity is decreased in anaerobic culture supernatant compared to aerobic culture supernatant of wildtype strain 10403s and isogenic mutants. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05 ** p<.01). B top Abundance of LLO is lower in anaerobic (“AN”) culture supernatant (“SUP”) compared to aerobic (“A”) culture supernatant. Lysate (“LYS”) of samples shows similar total protein levels. B bottom Silver stain was used as a loading control and shows similar total protein levels between aerobic and anaerobic samples. Recombinant LLO (“rLLO”) was used as a positive control and supernatant from mutant lacking the hly gene (∆hly) was used as a negative control

Figure 3.4 Buffering media or exogenous supplementation of lactate or acetoin does not alleviate the reduced LLO production under anaerobic conditions relative Effectsto aerobic of conditionsFiguremetabolic signals 3.3 Anaerobicallyon anaerobic grown LLO L. production monocytogenes secretes less LLO. A LLO activity is decreased in anaerobic culture supernatant compared to aerobic culture supernatant of wildtype strain 10403s and isogenic mutants. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisksTo (*p<0.05 identify ** factors p<.01). contributingB top Abundance to regulation of LLO is lower of LLO in anaerobic production (“AN”) in culture response supernatant (“SUP”) compared to aerobic (“A”) culture supernatant. Lysate (“LYS”) of tosamples the presence shows similar or absence total protein of oxygen,levels. B bottomwe investigated Silver stain thewas roleused ofas physiological a loading control and shows similar total protein levels between aerobic and anaerobic samples. Recombinant LLO (“rLLO”) was used as a positive control and supernatant from mutant andlacking metabolic the hly gene signals (∆hly) differentially was used as agenerated negative control during aerobic or anaerobic growth. We first considered the role of lactic acid, a fermentation acid produced Figure 3.4 Buffering media or exogenous supplementation of lactate or acetoin fromdoes pyruvate not alleviate during the reducedL. monocytogenes LLO production anaerobic under anaerobic growth, conditionsin regulation relative of LLO to aerobic conditions. A Compared to aerobic cultures, LLO activity in supernatant of anaerobic cultures in BHI or BHI buffered with MOPS (pH 7.0) was significantly lower. B production.Lactate supplementation The signal enhancedfrom lactic culture acid supernatant could be twoLLO foldactivity— thein aerobically acidification and of the anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. C Acetoin supplementation did not enhance LLO mediumactivity in or aerobically the organic or anaerobically acid itself. grown To test L. monocytogenes. the role of medium Averages acidification, of triplicates we are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed measuredusing a two LLO-tailed activity student’s in t thetest withsupernatant significant ofdifferences cultures indicated grown inby bufferedasterisks medium (*p<.05 **p<.01)

87 Figure 3.5 Supplementation of intermediates involved in central carbon metabolism alters carbon metabolism and increases supernatant LLO activity of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenesFigure 3.4 Buffering media or exogenous supplementation of lactate or acetoin does not alleviate the reduced LLO to prevent medium acidification with or without oxygen. In MOPS-buffered medium (pH 7.0), while there was no significant difference in pH between aerobic and anaerobic cultures (Table 1), LLO activity was significantly lower in anaerobic culture supernatant than that in aerobic culture supernatant (Fig. 4A).

Exogenous supplementation of lactate (2 mM) resulted in increased LLO activity in both aerobic and anaerobic culture supernatant but didn’t alleviate the relatively lower levels of anaerobic LLO production. (Fig. 4B). In contrast, exogenous supplementation of the aerobic metabolite, acetoin, did not affect LLO activity in aerobic or anaerobic cultures (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that while acetoin and lactate are both metabolite products of pyruvate, only lactate supplementation influenced anaerobic LLO production.

Figure 3.4 Buffering media or exogenous supplementation of lactate or acetoin does not alleviate the reduced LLO production under anaerobic conditions relative to aerobic conditions. A Compared to aerobic cultures, LLO activity in supernatant of anaerobic cultures in BHI or BHI buffered with MOPS (pH 7.0) was significantly lower. B Lactate supplementation enhanced culture supernatant LLO activity in aerobically and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. C Acetoin supplementation did not enhance LLO activity in aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using

88

Effects of central carbon metabolites on LLO production

Lactate production is catalyzed by a reversible enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase, from pyruvate—a metabolite that connects to multiple carbon metabolic pathways in L. monocytogenes (Fig. 5A). Therefore, the effect of lactate on anaerobic LLO production is likely mediated by signals generated through pyruvate metabolism. When pyruvate was supplemented in the culture medium, we observed a dramatic increase in both aerobic and anaerobic LLO production (Fig. 5B). The pyruvate supplementation also resulted in an increase in acetoin production under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Fig. 5C), a phenotype suggesting exogenous pyruvate was taken up and metabolized.

Because pyruvate is also metabolized to generate acetyl-coA for tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, we tested the effects of TCA intermediates on anaerobic LLO production. If increase in the carbon flux through pyruvate was important in enhancing anaerobic LLO production, then supplementation of downstream metabolites in the TCA cycle should exhibit similar anaerobic enhancement of

LLO production. Indeed, supplementations of acetate, citrate, succinate, and fumarate all resulted in higher levels of anaerobic LLO production (Fig. 5D).

These data highlighted a potential role for central carbon metabolites in influencing LLO production in the absence of oxygen.

89 Figure 3.5 Supplementation of intermediates involved in central carbon metabolism alters carbon metabolism and increases supernatant LLO activity of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. A Simplified schematic shows three possible fates of pyruvate in L. monocytogenes central carbon metabolism. B Exogenous supplementation of pyruvate enhanced LLO activity in both aerobic and anaerobic culture supernatant. C Exogenous pyruvate supplementation increased acetoin concentrations in both aerobic and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. D Supplementation of intermediates of the TCA cycle (50mM) enhanced anaerobic LLO activity. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<.05 ***p<0.001)

Discussion

As an enteric pathogen, L. monocytogenes encounters fluctuating levels of oxygen from the aerobic oral cavity to the anaerobic intestinal lumen. As a result, metabolic adaptations to anaerobic conditions are an inevitable process

90 during intestinal phase of infections. Here we show that anaerobic growth resulted in major changes in carbon metabolism characterized by the lack of acetoin production and the increased production of lactate and ethanol. Ethanol concentrations for aerobic cultures may be underestimated because of the loss through culture agitation during aerobic growth. Curiously, anaerobic growth led to different morphologies under TEM. It is not clear if the differences in morphology are a result of specific structural differences or a result of different responses to TEM sample preparation processes. Both scenarios suggest surface modifications in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes that can potentially lead to changes in stress resistance during transit through the anaerobic lumen during intestinal phase of infections.

Anaerobic growth also resulted in significant changes in subsequent interactions with host cells under aerobic conditions. Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibited a significant increase in cell invasion but a significant decrease in actin co-localization and intracellular growth compared to aerobically grown bacteria. These results suggest that while anaerobic growth results in enhanced internalization into host cells, likely as a result of the increased expressions of internalins (Toledo-Arana et al. 2009) and LAP (Burkholder et al.

2009), it does not provide advantages in subsequent intracellular growth.

Because L. monocytogenes entry into the host cytosol mainly relies on the activity of LLO (Hamon et al. 2012), the lack of actin co-localization phenotype can be partially attributed to the reduced LLO production exhibited by anaerobically grown bacteria. Alternatively, it is also possible that anaerobically

91 grown L. monocytogenes have compromised intracellular expression of ActA, which facilitates actin polymerization as a means for bacterial motility and cell- cell spread. ActA is typically expressed by intracellular L. monocytogenes.

However, the role of physiological or metabolic states of L. monocytogenes prior to entering host cells in intracellular ActA expression is not clear. Given the role of L. monocytogenes dissemination in lethal infections, knowledge of how extracellular conditions influence subsequent intracellular behavior can be used to develop strategies to restrict L. monocytogenes infections in the intestines without spreading to peripheral organs.

To begin investigating the regulatory mechanism, we first tested the anaerobic LLO production in isogenic mutants either lacking known transcription regulators (∆sigB and ∆codY) or harboring constitutively active regulator (PrfA*).

In all the mutants tested, hemolytic activities in anaerobic culture supernatant were significantly lower than those in aerobic culture supernatant. These results suggest that these known transcriptional regulators are not directly involved in the anaerobic suppression of LLO production. L. monocytogenes genome contains 15 putative members in the Crp/Fnr protein family (Glaser et al. 2001), which is known for their ability to detect and respond to environmental signals such as fluctuating oxygen levels (Körner, Sofia, and Zumft 2003). Although mutations in each of these genes did not result in compromised growth in reduced oxygen conditions (Uhlich, Wonderling, and Luchansky 2006), these regulators may still play a direct or indirect role in detecting oxygen levels and modulating virulence gene expressions. In addition to the Crp/Fnr protein family,

92 L. monocytogenes has 15 histidine kinases and 16 response regulators with demonstrated functions in fitness and pathogenesis (Williams et al. 2005; Larsen et al. 2006; Vivant et al. 2014; Gottschalk et al. 2008; Kallipolitis et al. 2003;

Dons et al. 2004; Flanary et al. 1999; Brøndsted et al. 2003; Collins et al. 2012;

Cotter, Guinane, and Hill 2002; Nielsen et al. 2012; Kallipolitis and Ingmer 2001;

Pöntinen et al. 2015). However, it’s not clear how the signal transduction system is involved in L. monocytogenes anaerobic adaptations. Future investigations into their activities under anaerobic conditions can dramatically enrich our current understanding of L. monocytogenes anaerobic virulence regulation.

To further explore potential signals involved in the regulation of anaerobic

LLO production, we first tested the effects of lactic acid, the main product of L. monocytogenes anaerobic metabolism, on anaerobic LLO production. We considered lactic acid as two separate signals, medium acidification and the organic acid itself, and found that the lower LLO production under anaerobic conditions compared to aerobic conditions cannot be explained by medium acidification or lactate. While lactate supplementation does not influence the potential suppression of anaerobic LLO production compared to aerobic LLO production, it enhances anaerobic LLO production compared to no lactate anaerobic control. This led us to consider anaerobic carbon metabolism as part of the signaling pathway leading to decreased anaerobic LLO production. Lactate is typically produced by L. monocytogenes from pyruvate through a reversible enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase. Therefore, the exogenous supplementation of lactate may potentially be converted back to pyruvate, which can then enter

93 multiple carbon metabolic pathways. In contrast, the lack of effect from acetoin suggests that the acetoin production is a non-reversible pathway or that the expression of pathway enzymes are suppressed under anaerobic conditions. To directly confirm the role of pyruvate, we tested and demonstrated the positive effects of exogenous pyruvate on LLO and acetoin production. The dramatic effects of pyruvate observed in our study suggest that LLO production is sensitive to modulation by signals generated through pyruvate metabolism.

The TCA cycle is one of the main metabolic pathways utilizing pyruvate as the main carbon substrate. L. monocytogenes has an incomplete TCA cycle (Fig.

5A), lacking 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, succinyl-CoA synthetase, and succinic dehydrogenase (Glaser et al. 2001; Trivett and Meyer 1971). Although an incomplete TCA cycle is not an uncommon genotype in bacteria (Huynen,

Dandekar, and Bork 1999), its presence often demands additional means for bacteria to generate TCA intermediates to support anabolic pathways. L. monocytogenes is capable of generating oxaloacetate from pyruvate by pyruvate carboxylase (Schär et al. 2010) and succinate from gamma-aminobutyrate

(GABA) by the glutamate decarboxylase system coupled with the GABA shunt under acid stress conditions (Feehily, O’Byrne, and Karatzas 2013; Cotter,

Gahan, and Hill 2001). As a result, the carbon flux of TCA cycle in L. monocytogenes might not be unidirectional and might change under different physiological conditions. In E. coli and Bacillus subtilis, TCA cycle is known to be suppressed under anaerobic conditions (Spencer and Guest 1987; Nakano,

Zuber, and Sonenshein 1998; Gray, Wimpenny, and Mossman 1966) and by

94 catabolite repression (Gosset et al. 2004; Nakano, Zuber, and Sonenshein

1998). While catabolite repression has been associated with L. monocytogenes virulence regulation (Gilbreth, Benson, and Hutkins 2004), which is known to respond to the presence of fermentable carbohydrates (Behari and Youngman

1998), the anaerobic TCA cycle activities have not been investigated in detail. If

TCA cycle activity is reduced in L. monocytogenes under anaerobic conditions similarly to E. coli and B. subtilis, our results showing the positive effects of TCA cycle intermediates on anaerobic LLO production suggest a connection between the reduced TCA cycle activity and the decreased anaerobic LLO production.

All TCA cycle intermediates, when supplemented exogenously, resulted in an increase in anaerobic LLO production. Curiously, only citrate supplementation led to a significantly decreased aerobic LLO production compared to no supplementation control. Citrate has a multifaceted role in bacterial metabolism and physiology. As an intermediate metabolite in the TCA cycle, it serves as a feedback molecule that binds to the catabolite control protein C (CcpC) and suppresses the transcription of the first two genes in the TCA cycle—citrate synthase (citZ) and aconitase (citB) (Kim, Mittal, and Sonenshein 2006a; Mittal et al. 2013). However, when the intracellular level of citrate is artificially high, as established with citB mutation, citrate-bound CcpC acts as a transcriptional activator for citB

. Therefore, the relationship between citrate levels and CcpC activities is not linear. It is possible that the opposing effects of exogenous citrate on aerobic or

95 anaerobic LLO production reflect the different intracellular citrate levels achieved by exogenous citrate supplementations and the corresponding citrate synthase and aconitase activities under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.

In summary, our study highlights a critical role of anaerobic exposure in L. monocytogenes infections. L. monocytogenes grown anaerobically exhibit higher levels of internalization into host cells but compromised actin polymerization and intracellular growth, both of which might be attributed to the decreased LLO production. To better understand the mechanism underlying the anaerobic regulation of LLO production, our study suggests TCA cycle metabolites as positive signaling molecules for anaerobic LLO production. With anaerobic exposure a necessary step during infections, results from our study help strengthen current knowledge on L. monocytogenes adaptations and responses under anaerobic conditions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Behari, J., and P. Youngman 1998 Regulation of Hly Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes by Carbon Sources and pH Occurs through Separate Mechanisms Mediated by PrfA. Infection and Immunity 66(8): 3635–3642.

Bo Andersen, Jens, Bent B Roldgaard, Bjarke Bak Christensen, and Tine Rask Licht 2007 Oxygen Restriction Increases the Infective Potential of Listeria Monocytogenes in Vitro in Caco-2 Cells and in Vivo in Guinea Pigs. BMC Microbiology 7: 55.

96

Brøndsted, Lone, Birgitte H. Kallipolitis, Hanne Ingmer, and Susanne Knöchel 2003 kdpE and a Putative RsbQ Homologue Contribute to Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes at High Osmolarity and Low Temperature. FEMS Microbiology Letters 219(2): 233–239.

Bruno, Joseph C., and Nancy E. Freitag 2010 Constitutive Activation of PrfA Tilts the Balance of Listeria Monocytogenes Fitness towards Life within the Host versus Environmental Survival. PloS One 5(12): e15138.

Burkholder, Kristin M., Kwang-Pyo Kim, Krishna K. Mishra, et al. 2009 Expression of LAP, a SecA2-Dependent Secretory Protein, Is Induced under Anaerobic Environment. Microbes and Infection 11(10–11): 859–867.

Collins, Barry, Caitriona M. Guinane, Paul D. Cotter, Colin Hill, and R. Paul Ross 2012 Assessing the Contributions of the LiaS Histidine Kinase to the Innate Resistance of Listeria Monocytogenes to Nisin, Cephalosporins, and Disinfectants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78(8): 2923–2929.

Cotter, Paul D., Cormac G. M. Gahan, and Colin Hill 2001 A Glutamate Decarboxylase System Protects Listeria Monocytogenes in Gastric Fluid. Molecular Microbiology 40(2): 465–475.

Cotter, Paul D., Caitriona M. Guinane, and Colin Hill 2002 The LisRK Signal Transduction System Determines the Sensitivity of Listeria Monocytogenes to Nisin and Cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46(9): 2784–2790.

Dons, Lone, Emma Eriksson, Yuxuan Jin, et al. 2004 Role of Flagellin and the Two-Component CheA/CheY System of Listeria Monocytogenes in Host Cell Invasion and Virulence. Infection and Immunity 72(6): 3237–3244.

Feehily, Conor, Conor P. O’Byrne, and Kimon Andreas G. Karatzas 2013 Functional γ-Aminobutyrate Shunt in Listeria Monocytogenes: Role in Acid Tolerance and Succinate Biosynthesis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79(1): 74–80.

Flanary, P. L., R. D. Allen, L. Dons, and S. Kathariou 1999 Insertional Inactivation of the Listeria Monocytogenes cheYA Operon Abolishes Response to Oxygen Gradients and Reduces the Number of Flagella. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45(8): 646–652.

Gilbreth, Stefanie Evans, Andrew K. Benson, and Robert W. Hutkins 2004 Catabolite Repression and Virulence Gene Expression in Listeria

97 Monocytogenes. Current Microbiology 49(2): 95–98.

Glaser, P., L. Frangeul, C. Buchrieser, et al. 2001 Comparative Genomics of Listeria Species. Science 294(5543): 849–852.

Gosset, Guillermo, Zhongge Zhang, Samir Nayyar, William A. Cuevas, and Milton H. Saier 2004 Transcriptome Analysis of Crp-Dependent Catabolite Control of Gene Expression in Escherichia Coli. Journal of Bacteriology 186(11): 3516–3524.

Gottschalk, Sanne, Iver Bygebjerg-Hove, Mette Bonde, et al. 2008 The Two-Component System CesRK Controls the Transcriptional Induction of Cell Envelope-Related Genes in Listeria Monocytogenes in Response to Cell Wall-Acting Antibiotics. Journal of Bacteriology 190(13): 4772– 4776.

Gray, C. T., J. W. Wimpenny, and M. R. Mossman 1966 Regulation of Metabolism in Facultative Bacteria. II. Effects of Aerobiosis, Anaerobiosis and Nutrition on the Formation of Krebs Cycle Enzymes in Escherichia Coli. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 117(1): 33–41.

Hamon, Mélanie Anne, David Ribet, Fabrizia Stavru, and Pascale Cossart 2012 Listeriolysin O: The Swiss Army Knife of Listeria. Trends in Microbiology 20(8): 360–368. de las Heras, Aitor, Robert J. Cain, Magdalena K. Bieleckal, and Jose A. Vazquez-Boland 2011 Regulation of Listeria Virulence: PrfA Master and Commander. Current Opinion in Microbiology 14(2): 118–127.

Huynen, M. A., T. Dandekar, and P. Bork 1999 Variation and Evolution of the Citric-Acid Cycle: A Genomic Perspective. Trends in Microbiology 7(7): 281–291.

Jydegaard-Axelsen, Anne-Marie, Poul Erik Høiby, Kim Holmstrøm, Nicholas Russell, and Susanne Knøchel 2004 CO2- and Anaerobiosis-Induced Changes in Physiology and Gene Expression of Different Listeria Monocytogenes Strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70(7): 4111–4117.

Kallipolitis, B. H., and H. Ingmer 2001 Listeria Monocytogenes Response Regulators Important for Stress Tolerance and Pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204(1): 111–115.

Kallipolitis, Birgitte H., Hanne Ingmer, Cormac G. Gahan, Colin Hill, and Lotte Søgaard-Andersen

98 2003 CesRK, a Two-Component Signal Transduction System in Listeria Monocytogenes, Responds to the Presence of Cell Wall-Acting Antibiotics and Affects Beta-Lactam Resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47(11): 3421–3429.

Kim, Hyun-Jin, Meghna Mittal, and Abraham L. Sonenshein 2006 CcpC-Dependent Regulation of citB and lmo0847 in Listeria

Körner, Heinz, Heidi J. Sofia, and Walter G. Zumft 2003 Phylogeny of the Bacterial Superfamily of Crp-Fnr Transcription Regulators: Exploiting the Metabolic Spectrum by Controlling Alternative Gene Programs. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 27(5): 559–592.

Larsen, Marianne H., Birgitte H. Kallipolitis, Janne K. Christiansen, John E. Olsen, and Hanne Ingmer 2006 The Response Regulator ResD Modulates Virulence Gene Expression in Response to Carbohydrates in Listeria Monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 61(6): 1622–1635.

Lobel, Lior, Nadejda Sigal, Ilya Borovok, et al. 2015 The Metabolic Regulator CodY Links Listeria Monocytogenes Metabolism to Virulence by Directly Activating the Virulence Regulatory Gene prfA. Molecular Microbiology 95(4): 624–644.

Mittal, Meghna, Kieran B. Pechter, Silvia Picossi, et al. 2013 Dual Role of CcpC Protein in Regulation of Aconitase Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes and Bacillus Subtilis. Microbiology (Reading, England) 159(Pt 1): 68–76.

Mittal, Meghna, Silvia Picossi, and Abraham L. Sonenshein 2009 CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 191(3): 862–872.

Müller-Herbst, Stefanie, Stefanie Wüstner, Anna Mühlig, et al. 2014 Identification of Genes Essential for Anaerobic Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 160(Pt 4): 752–765.

Nakano, M. M., P. Zuber, and A. L. Sonenshein 1998 Anaerobic Regulation of Bacillus Subtilis Krebs Cycle Genes. Journal of Bacteriology 180(13): 3304–3311.

Nicholson, Wayne L. 2008 The Bacillus Subtilis ydjL (bdhA) Gene Encodes Acetoin Reductase/2,3- Butanediol Dehydrogenase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(22): 6832–6838.

99 Nielsen, Pia Kiil, Ann Zahle Andersen, Maarten Mols, et al. 2012 Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiling of the Cell Envelope Stress Response and the Role of LisRK and CesRK in Listeria Monocytogenes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 158(Pt 4): 963–974.

Pine, L., G. B. Malcolm, J. B. Brooks, and M. I. Daneshvar 1989 Physiological Studies on the Growth and Utilization of Sugars by Listeria Species. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 35(2): 245–254.

Pöntinen, Anna, Annukka Markkula, Miia Lindström, and Hannu Korkeala 2015 Two-Component-System Histidine Kinases Involved in Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes EGD-E at Low Temperatures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81(12): 3994–4004.

Rauch, Marcus, Qin Luo, Stefanie Müller-Altrock, and Werner Goebel 2005 SigB-Dependent in Vitro Transcription of prfA and Some Newly Identified Genes of Listeria Monocytogenes Whose Expression Is Affected by PrfA in Vivo. Journal of Bacteriology 187(2): 800–804.

Romick, T. L., and H. P. Fleming 1998 Acetoin Production as an Indicator of Growth and Metabolic Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Applied Microbiology 84(1): 18–24.

Romick, T. L., H. P. Fleming, and R. F. McFeeters 1996 Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes in Defined Glucose Medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(1): 304–307.

Spencer, M. E., and J. R. Guest 1987 Regulation of Citric Acid Cycle Genes in Facultative Bacteria. Microbiological Sciences 4(6): 164–168.

Toledo-Arana, Alejandro, Olivier Dussurget, Georgios Nikitas, et al. 2009 The Listeria Transcriptional Landscape from Saprophytism to Virulence. Nature 459(7249): 950–956.

Trivett, T. L., and E. A. Meyer 1971 Citrate Cycle and Related Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 107(3): 770–779.

Uhlich, Gaylen A., Laura D. Wonderling, and John B. Luchansky 2006 Analyses of the Putative Crp/Fnr Family of Transcriptional Regulators of a Serotype 4b Strain of Listeria Monocytogenes. Food Microbiology 23(3): 300– 306.

Vivant, Anne-Laure, Dominique Garmyn, Laurent Gal, and Pascal Piveteau 2014 The Agr Communication System Provides a Benefit to the Populations of

100 Listeria Monocytogenes in Soil. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 4: 160.

Williams, Tatjana, Susanne Bauer, Dagmar Beier, and Michael Kuhn 2005 Construction and Characterization of Listeria Monocytogenes Mutants with in-Frame Deletions in the Response Regulator Genes Identified in the Genome Sequence. Infection and Immunity 73(5): 3152–3159

101 CHAPTER IV

STIMULATING RESPIRATORY ACTIVITY PRIMES ANAEROBICALLY GROWN

LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES FOR INTRACELLULAR INFECTION

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive, enteric pathogen and the causative agent of listeriosis. During transition through the gastrointestinal tract,

L. monocytogenes routinely encounters suboxic conditions. However, how the exposure to the low oxygen environment affects subsequent pathogenesis is not completely understood. Our lab previously reported that anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibited an intracellular growth defect in macrophages even though the infections took place under aerobic conditions. This phenotype suggests that prior growth conditions have a prolonged effect on the outcome of subsequent intracellular infection. In this study, we investigated further the mechanisms that contribute to the compromised intracellular growth after anaerobic exposure. We hypothesized that the lack of respiratory activity under anaerobic conditions prevented anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes to establish subsequent intracellular growth under aerobic conditions. Therefore, we stimulated respiratory activity in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes by

102 supplementing exogenous fumarate and assessed subsequent intracellular pathogenesis. We found that fumarate supplementation significantly increased the respiratory activity of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes and rescued the subsequent intracellular growth defect, likely through promoting the production of listeriolysin O, phagosomal escape, and cell-cell spread. This study highlights the importance of anaerobic exposure in the intestinal lumen in the outcome of subsequent intracellular infections.

Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes, anaerobic respiration, fumarate, intracellular infection

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobe found in a variety of environmental habitats (Vivant,

Garmyn, and Piveteau 2013; Linke et al. 2014). When L. monocytogenes enters an animal host through ingestion and establishes infections as an intracellular pathogen, it can cause diseases with high mortality rate in immunocompromised individuals. For example, within the 1998-2008 decade, confirmed L. monocytogenes outbreaks led to a total of 38 deaths out of 359 illnesses

(Cartwright et al. 2013). Moreover, it was estimated that L. monocytogenes infections were responsible for an annual cost burden of $2.8 billion in the United

States (USDA ERS - Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses n.d.). The high

103 mortality rate and the cost burden associated with L. monocytogenes infections together render L. monocytogenes a critical foodborne pathogen that needs to be under routine surveillance in the food industry. However, L. monocytogenes exhibits a unique ability to survive and grow in food preservation processes that are generally considered antimicrobial, such as high osmotic stress, low pH, and refrigeration temperatures (Dykes and Moorhead 2000; Walker, Archer, and

Banks 1990; Angelidis and Smith 2003). Therefore, to effectively prevent L. monocytogenes contamination in food products and protect high-risk individuals from L. monocytogenes exposure, it is necessary to consider and understand how L. monocytogenes responds and adapts to different environmental conditions.

Being a facultative anaerobe, L. monocytogenes is able to survive and proliferate in conditions of low to no oxygen. As L. monocytogenes traverses the human gastrointestinal tract during infection, it encounters varying concentrations of oxygen (Fisher et al. 2013; Albenberg et al. 2014). How this exposure and potential adaptation to microaerobic to anaerobic conditions impact subsequent infections is not completely understood. L. monocytogenes cultured under strict anaerobic conditions have an initial invasion advantage compared to those cultured under aerobic condition, a phenotype mediated through the upregulating the Listeria adhesion protein (LAP) under anaerobic (Burkholder and Bhunia

2010; Burkholder et al. 2009). We have also observed this initial invasion advantage in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes during infections of different cell lines. However, we reported that over a period of 8 hours, prior anaerobic

104 exposure actually led to an intracellular growth defect (Wallace et al. 2017). This observation suggests a sustained effect of anaerobic growth on subsequent aerobic intracellular infections.

L. monocytogenes adaptation to anaerobic conditions includes shifts in carbon metabolism. In defined medium using glucose as the sole carbon source, aerobic growth results in the production lactate, acetate, and acetoin, whereas anaerobic growth results in the production of lactate with minor accumulation of acetate, formate, and ethanol (Romick, Fleming, and McFeeters 1996). In rich

BHI medium, acetoin production was observed under aerobic but not anaerobic conditions (Wallace et al. 2017). Although L. monocytogenes is primarily a lactic acid fermenter, it contains genes coding for a fumarate reductase. The gene lmo0355, which encodes a subunit in fumarate reductase in strain EGDe, is upregulated under anaerobic conditions and allows L. monocytogenes to show an enhanced anaerobic growth in the presence of fumarate (Müller-Herbst et al.

2014). Therefore, it is likely that L. monocytogenes is capable of carrying out anaerobic respiration using fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor.

To further understand the impact of anaerobic adaptation on L. monocytogenes pathogenesis, we tested whether the defective intracellular growth after anaerobic exposure was caused by anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes having reduced respiratory activity and thus a delay in aerobic growth. We utilized fumarate as an alternative electron acceptor to stimulate respiratory activity in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes and assessed the effects of fumarate on subsequent infections. We reported here that stimulating

105 anaerobic respiratory activity with fumarate significantly enhanced subsequent intracellular growth. Conversely, reducing respiratory activity in aerobically grown

L. monocytogenes by adding the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) caused aerobic L. monocytogenes to display phenotypes similar to anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Therefore, our findings indicate that the state of respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes prior to infections is a strong indicator for subsequent success in pathogenesis.

Results

If the lack of respiratory activity contributes to the intracellular growth defect in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes, stimulating anaerobic respiratory activity using an alternative electron acceptor such as fumarate should rescue the intracellular growth defect. To confirm that supplementation of fumarate can indeed stimulate respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes under anaerobic conditions, we performed multiple in vitro assays investigating the physiological responses to fumarate. During anaerobic growth in BHI at 37°C, supplementation of 50 mM fumarate resulted in a significant increase in overnight culture optical density (OD), compared to no fumarate controls (Figure 1a). This anaerobic, fumarate-induced increase in optical density is accompanied by a significant increase in culture pH (Figure 1b) and acetoin level (Figure 1c), a significantly higher tetrazolium reduction activity (Figure 1d), and a significantly higher intracellular ATP levels (Figure 1e). In contrast, supplementation of

106 fumarate under aerobic conditions did not significantly alter culture OD, pH, acetoin level, or tetrazolium reduction activity (Figures 1a-d) but resulted in a significantly decreased intracellular ATP levels (Figure 1e) compared to aerobic, no fumarate controls. These data collectively show that exogenous supplementation of fumarate can significantly alter the anaerobic physiology and metabolism of L. monocytogenes, likely reducing fermentative activities but increasing respiratory activities.

107

Figure 4.1. Fumarate enhances L. monocytogenes anaerobic respiratory activity. L. monocytogenes was grown overnight (16-20 hours) aerobically or anaerobically in BHI at 37°C with or without supplementation of fumarate (50 mM). Culture optical density was measured at 600 nm (a). The pH (b) and acetoin concentration (c) were determined in culture supernatant. Reduction of tetrazolium salt (d) was determined using washed bacterial pellets. Relative intracellular ATP levels (e) was quantified using a luciferase-based assay. Average of triplicates were plotted with error bars representing standard deviation. Data represent at least three independent experiments. Significant differences (*, p<0.05; **, 0.001

Next, we investigated whether the anaerobic, fumarate-stimulated L. monocytogenes exhibits a faster growth transition from anaerobic to aerobic growth by first analyzing in vitro growth in BHI at 37°C. Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibited a decreased growth phenotype after transitioning into

108 aerobic conditions (Figure 2a). In comparison, anaerobically grown, fumarate- stimulated L. monocytogenes exhibited a faster adaptation to aerobic growth

(Figure 2a). Similar phenotypes were also observed during transitions into aerobic, intracellular growth. Overnight L. monocytogenes cultures were used to infect RAW264.7 macrophages for 30 minutes at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 and assayed for intracellular growth. The extent of intracellular growth was similar in macrophages infected with aerobically grown L. monocytogenes with or without prior fumarate stimulation (Figure 2b). However, in macrophages infected with anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes, the intracellular growth was greatly enhanced by exposing bacteria to fumarate prior to infection (Figure 2b). These in vitro and intracellular growth characteristics support our hypothesis that, compared to anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes, anaerobic, fumarate- stimulated L. monocytogenes exhibits an increased respiratory activity and a faster anaerobic to aerobic growth transition in vitro and inside host cells.

109

Figure 4.2. Fumarate-treated L. monocytogenes exhibited enhanced transition to aerobic in vitro and intracellular growth. Overnight cultures grown under aerobic or anaerobic conditions were used to inoculate fresh BHI media and grown under aerobic conditions (a) or to infect RAW264.7 macrophages for 30 minutes at an MOI of 10 (b). Averages of triplicates were plotted with error bars representing standard deviation. Data represent three independent experiments. Significant differences (*, p<0.05; **, 0.001

If respiratory activity prior to infection is key in subsequent intracellular success, compromising respiratory activity in aerobically grown L. monocytogenes should, in theory, result in reduced pathogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we grew L. monocytogenes in BHI at 37°C in the presence of CCCP to reduce its respiratory activity and assessed the impact on L. monocytogenes and L. monocytogenes-host interactions. We first established a working concentration of 1 µM CCCP to reduce aerobic growth to a level similar to anaerobic growth without complete growth inhibition. Compared to no

110 supplement, both aerobic and anaerobic growth with 1 µM CCCP was significantly reduced (Figure 3a). However, compared to no supplement, CCCP treatment resulted in significantly reduced culture pH and tetrazolium reduction activity under aerobic but not anaerobic conditions (Figure 3b, c). We then grew

L. monocytogenes with or without CCCP treatment to infect RAW264.7 macrophages and assessed the impact of prior CCCP treatment in subsequent intracellular growth. At one hour post infection (hpi), there was a significantly higher intracellular CFU in macrophages infected with the aerobically grown,

CCCP-treated L. monocytogenes than those infected with aerobically grown, untreated controls. However, there was no difference in intracellular growth over an eight-hour period for bacteria grown with or without CCCP (data not shown).

These results suggest that compromising respiratory activity in aerobically grown

L. monocytogenes prior to infection leads to early but not sustained defects in intracellular growth.

111

Figure 4.3. Inhibition of aerobic respiratory activity with CCCP phenocopies anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. L. monocytogenes was grown at 37°C in BHI with or without 1 µM CCCP. Culture optical density was measured at 600 nm (a). pH was measured in culture supernatant (b) while reduction of tetrazolium salts was measured in washed bacterial pellets (c). Bacteria from overnight cultures were used to infect RAW264.7 macrophages for 30 minutes at an MOI of 10 where intracellular colony forming units (CFU) was determined and compared to the CFU in inoculum (d). Averages of triplicates were plotted with error bars representing standard deviation. Data represent three independent experiments. Significant differences (**, 0.001

To establish a successful intracellular life cycle, L. monocytogenes needs to escape the phagosome in order to grow in the host cytoplasm. This phagosomal escape is mediated by the secreted virulence factor, listeriolysin O

(LLO). Therefore, to determine whether the intracellular fate of fumarate- stimulated or CCCP-treated L. monocytogenes was attributed to different levels

112 of LLO production, we first investigated the effects of fumarate and CCCP on

LLO production in vitro. The activity of the secreted LLO was significantly higher in aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes with fumarate supplementation (Figure 4a). Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes treated with 1 µM CCCP decreased secreted LLO activity in aerobic but not anaerobic cultures when normalized to culture optical density. (Figure 4b). To confirm supernatant LLO activity is representative of protein abundance, we quantified secreted LLO protein abundance using immunoblotting (Figure 4c, left) followed by pixel density analysis (Figure 4c, right). Compared to no fumarate controls, the abundance of LLO protein was significantly increased, under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, in cultures stimulated with fumarate. However, CCCP treatment led to no significant difference in LLO abundance compared to no

CCCP controls. These results suggest that while in general the LLO protein activities correlate with protein abundance, a similar correlation was not observed in aerobic, CCCP-treated bacteria.

We further investigated whether the effects of fumarate and CCCP on in vitro LLO production would result in an altered phenotype during infections by assaying bacterial actin co-localization as a proxy for phagosomal escape. We found that fumarate supplementation in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes resulted in a significantly increased level of actin co-localization at 2 hpi compared to no fumarate controls (Figure 4d), a phenotype consistent with the

LLO activity result. However, fumarate supplementation in aerobically grown L. monocytogenes resulted in a significantly reduced level of actin co-localization

113 compared to untreated samples (Figure 4d). Additionally, while CCCP treatment in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes did not significantly alter actin co- localization, CCCP treatment in aerobically grown L. monocytogenes led to a significant decrease in the actin co-localization (Figure 4e). These results suggest that respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes prior to infection may play a role in both vacuolar escape as well as subsequent actin polymerization.

114

Figure 4.4. Modulations of respiratory activity alter production of LLO and actin co- localization. L. monocytogenes was grown overnight at 37°C in BHI. Culture supernatant was used to quantify LLO activity using a hemolytic assay (a, b). Averages of triplicates were plotted with error bars representing standard deviation. Data represent three independent experiments. LLO abundance in culture supernatant was determined using immunoblotting (c, left) followed by pixel density analysis (c, right). Blot shown is representative of six independent experiments. (rLLO, recombinant LLO control; NS, no supplement; SB, sample buffer; FUM, fumarate-treated L. monocytogenes; CCCP, CCCP-treated L. monocytogenes.) Averages of pixel density from six blots were plotted with error bars representing standard error of the mean (n=6). RAW264.7 macrophages were infected with overnight L. monocytogenes for 30 minutes at a MOI of 10. Actin colocalization was determined at 2 hours post infection (hpi). BD, or below detection, indicates lack of colocalization. Significant differences (*, p<0.05; **, 0.001

115 To further understand the sustained effects of L. monocytogenes respiratory activity prior to host cell entry on long-term infections, we performed

L2 plaque assays with bacteria grown aerobically or anaerobically with or without furmarate or CCCP treatments. With the diameter of the resulting plaques, measured at 3 days post infection, as a proxy for cell-to-cell spread, fumarate supplementation in L. monocytogenes grown under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions resulted in significantly larger plaques (Figure 5a). In contrast, CCCP treatment in aerobically but not anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes resulted in significantly decrease in plaque size (Figure 5a). It is important to note that during the 3 days of infection, neither fumarate nor CCCP was added to the cell culture media. Therefore, the differences in plaque sizes reflect a long-lasting impact of prior fumarate or CCCP exposure on subsequent infections. To investigate the effects of concurrent fumarate exposure on cell-cell spread, we compared plaque sizes from infections where fumarate was supplemented only in the growth of L. monocytogenes inoculum or in both the growth of L. monocytogenes inoculum and during infection. For aerobically grown L. monocytogenes, fumarate supplementation, either for the growth of inoculum or during infections, resulted in a significantly increased plaque sizes (Figure 5b).

For anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes, the presence of fumarate during infection resulted in complete clearing with undeterminable plaque size. These results confirm that respiratory activities prior to infections can impact subsequent infection outcomes with observable effects for as long as 3 days post

116 infections. Moreover, the presence of fumarate during infection greatly enhanced infections, particularly for anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes.

Figure 4.5. Prior or concurrent fumarate treatments enhance cell-cell spread. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were washed and used to infect fibroblast monolayer cells for 1 hour. After 72 hours of incubation, plaque sizes were measured by neutral red staining. Diameters of at least 30 plaques were measured. (a) Fumarate (50 mM) or CCCP (1 µM) was supplemented only in the growth of the inoculum. (b) Compared to no fumarate control (NS_NS), fumarate was added only to growth of the L. monocytogenes inoculum (FUM_NS) or to both the growth of L. monocytogenes and during the 72 hours of incubation (FUM_FUM). Fumarate supplementation during 72 hours of incubation in cells infected with anaerobically grown, fumarate treated L. monocytogenes resulted in complete lysis where plaque sizes were not determinable (CL, Complete Lysis)

Discussion

L. monocytogenes is a facultative anaerobe and is exposed to suboxic to anoxic environments during its transmission into and colonization of a host. How this exposure to fluctuating levels of oxygen affects subsequent infections is not completely understood. We and others have shown that anaerobic growth prior to infection resulted in a significant increase in invasion (Burkholder and Bhunia

2010; Burkholder et al. 2009; Wallace et al. 2017). However, we noted that this invasion advantage of anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes did not extend into

117 long-term intracellular growth. In fact, L. monocytogenes that was grown anaerobically exhibited a significantly compromised intracellular growth compared to those grown aerobically prior to infection (Wallace et al. 2017). It’s important to note that these cell culture-based infections lasted 8 hours under aerobic incubation. Therefore, the defect observed at 8 (Figure 2b) and 72 hours post infection (Figure 5a) suggests that prior adaptation to anaerobic conditions severely compromises the ability of L. monocytogenes to establish a productive, intracellular infection under aerobic conditions. In this study, we reported that the lack of respiratory activity in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes contributes the subsequent intracellular growth defect.

Using fumarate as an alternative electron acceptor, we were able to stimulate respiratory activity in anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes and assess its subsequent infection outcomes. As predicted, fumarate supplementation prior to infections resulted in a significantly enhanced intracellular growth that could be attributed to increased LLO production, phagosomal escape, and cell-cell spread. Conversely, we reduced respiratory activity in aerobically grown L. monocytogenes using the proton ionophore,

CCCP, and were able to compromise LLO activity, phagosomal escape, and cell- cell spread. Because fumarate or CCCP treatments took place during the growth of L. monocytogenes inoculum, not during infections, the results highlight the respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes prior to infection as a key determinant in infection outcome.

118 The choice for fumarate in our study was based mainly on the predicted ability of L. monocytogenes to utilize fumarate as an alternative electron acceptor in the absence of oxygen (Orsi et al. 2015; Trivett and Meyer 1971). However, the extent by which fumarate is involved in L. monocytogenes growth and pathogenesis goes beyond anaerobic respiration. Supplementation of fumarate as an intermediate in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, as reported here (Figure

4a-c) and elsewhere (Wallace et al. 2017), led to a significant increase in L. monocytogenes LLO production under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Therefore, it is possible that the increase in LLO production in anaerobic, fumarate-treated L. monocytogenes was a result of both stimulating TCA cycle and anaerobic respiratory activities. Interestingly, while LLO production was increased in both aerobically and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes by fumarate treatment, actin colocalization was only increased in macrophages infected by fumarate-treated, anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. In macrophages infected by aerobically grown L. monocytogenes, prior fumarate treatment resulted in a decreased level of actin colocalization. First, in vitro LLO production is not the absolute predictor for phagosomal escape, especially when

LLO production was measured using LLO accumulated in vitro over 16-20 hours of overnight culturing. Second, it is possible that while fumarate supplementation enhances LLO production in both aerobically and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes, its effect on subsequent intracellular ActA production is not equivalent between aerobic or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Given that aerobically grown, fumarate-treated bacteria exhibited no defects in

119 intracellular growth compared to aerobically grown, no fumarate controls (Figure

2b), it is likely that the decrease in actin colocalization is not a result of defects in phagosomal escape but in ActA production. How respiratory activity prior to infections affects subsequent intracellular ActA production is not known and is under current investigation.

The enhancing effect of exogenous fumarate on L. monocytogenes pathogenesis also raises concerns over the use of fumarate as a food preservative. United

States Food and Drug Administration recommends fumaric acid and salts of fumaric acid as safe to be used in food for direct human consumption “at a level not in excess of the amount reasonably required to accomplish the intended effect” (CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 n.d.). As a result, fumarate and its acid form, fumaric acid, have been tested as an antimicrobial additive in a variety of food products. For example, addition of fumaric acid (1%) to the surface of lean beef inoculated with L. monocytogenes, followed by 5 seconds of incubation at 55°C, resulted in a 1-log reduction in CFU (Podolak et al. 1996).

Fumaric acid (0.25%) also caused a complete inhibition of planktonic L. monocytogenes (Tango, Mansur, and Oh 2015). Therefore, co-occurrence of fumarate and suboxic packaging might create an environment where L. monocytogenes can persist and develop an increased capability for subsequent intracellular growth.

Based on the enhanced cell-cell spread in the presence of fumarate

(Figure 5b), the potential presence of fumarate inside host cytosol might also increase the severity of L. monocytogenes infections. Curiously, when fumarate

120 was supplemented both to the growth of inoculum and to the infected cells during incubation, the resulted enhancement in plaque size was much more pronounced in cells infected with anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes compared to those infected with aerobically grown L. monocytogenes (Figure 5b). This observation suggests that the presence of fumarate during infections might contribute to host response to aerobically or anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes. Therefore, we consider possible scenarios for intracellular L. monocytogenes to be exposed to cytosolic fumarate. Although fumarate is typically generated and consumed as part of the TCA cycle pathway located inside mitochondria, a cytosolic isoform of fumarate hydratase (FH), which catalyzes the hydration of fumarate to malate, has been described. In fact, individuals with FH deficiency exhibit severe neurological and developmental diseases (Fumarase Deficiency | Genetic and

Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD) – an NCATS Program n.d.).

Moreover, the oncogenic effects of fumarate accumulated in FH-deficient cells have helped introduce fumarate as a potential oncometabolite (Yang et al. 2012).

Elevated levels of fumarate in FH-deficient cells also lead to succination of , resulting in increased production of reactive oxygen species

(Sullivan et al. 2013), and defects in respiratory chain activities (Tyrakis et al.

2017). Whether exogenous fumarate supplementation to fibroblasts in our experimental design leads to an increase in cytosolic fumarate remains to be determined. However, our study highlighted that host-derived fumarate might greatly alter L. monocytogenes-host interactions.

121 Finally, the role of anaerobic respiration in modulating bacterial pathogenesis has been demonstrated in other enteric pathogens. For example, tetrathionate respiration provides Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with advantage to colonize the inflamed intestines (Thiennimitr et al. 2011; Winter et al. 2010). Cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae is also enhanced by anaerobic respiration (Lee et al. 2012; Oh et al. 2016). Recently, it was demonstrated that the ability of L. monocytogenes to perform extracellular electron transfer conferred a clear fitness advantage in vivo (Light et al. 2018).

When enteric bacterial pathogens transit through the suboxic host intestinal lumen, adaptive strategies to maintain redox homeostasis can directly modulate virulence regulation and offer a competitive advantage amidst the endogenous fermentative organisms. Moreover, based on findings from this study, these anaerobic adaptations can sustain long into aerobic environment and alter infection outcomes. Understanding the extent of the anaerobic adaptations in the pathogens will greatly enrich our ability to provide protection from infections.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

L. monocytogenes strain 10403s was grown from isolated colonies on freshly streaked brain–heart infusion (BHI) plates (<1 week) at 37 °C. All cultures were grown in filter-sterilized BHI media (Lot 4176589) to ensure consistency.

122 Aerobic cultures were grown with agitation at 250 RPM to ensure adequate oxygen diffusion. Anaerobic cultures were grown in a temperature-controlled incubator inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory, Type A) with a nitrogenous atmosphere containing 2.5% hydrogen. Optical density (OD) was measured in an optically clear 96-well plate at 600 nm with a volume of 200 µL per well using a 96-well plate reader (Biotek Synergy4). Sodium fumarate (Acros

Organics) was prepared as 1M stock solution in deionized water, filter-sterilized, and added directly to the media at the desired concentration.

Intracellular Growth Curves

Murine peritoneal macrophages RAW264.7 (ATCC TIB-71) were grown in

DMEM (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (JRScientific), HEPES (10 mM), and glutamine (2 mM) in a 37 °C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Prior to infections, cells were seeded in a

24-well tissue culture plate and grown for 14–18 h. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used for infections at a MOI of 10. Bacteria diluted in cell culture medium were added to each well (500 µL) and incubated for 30 min.

Following incubation, media were aspirated, and cells were washed twice with sterile DPBS. Fresh media (1 mL per well) containing 10 µg/mL gentamicin stock was added to each well. To enumerate intracellular bacteria, cell culture media were aspirated off and sterile 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Fisher BP151-100) was added to each well (200 µL per well) to lyse host cells. Lysates were diluted and

123 spread on LB plates. Colonies on plates were counted using an automatic colony counter (Synbiosis aCOLyte 3) after 24–48 h of incubation in a 37 °C incubator.

Tetrazolium Reduction Assay

Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were washed with PBS and normalized by OD600nm to a final volume of 1 mL. Tetrazolium Salt (MTT) working solution (50 µL, 0.5 mg/mL) was added to 50 µL of bacterial sample or blank control and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour in a 96-well flat-bottomed plate.

Following incubation, 100 µL of DMSO was added to each sample and the plate was placed in a 37°C incubator shaking for 15 minutes. Following incubation, samples were read at 540 nm to quantify the level of MTT reduction.

Measurement of Supernatant Acetoin

The Voges–Proskauer test was adapted to quantify acetoin production in the supernatant of overnight L. monocytogenes cultures. Supernatant or acetoin standards (100 µL) were placed into a sterile micro-centrifuge tube followed by additions of 70 µL of 0.5% creatine monohydrate in water (Sigma), 100 µL of 5%

1-Napthol in water (Sigma), and 100 µL of 40% KOH (Chempure) in 95% EtOH.

Samples were incubated at room temperature for 15 min and the absorbance was read at 560 nm. A standard curve was constructed to calculate the concentration of acetoin in culture supernatant samples.

124

Hemolytic Assay

Hemolytic assays were performed using supernatant from overnight cultures to measure the activity of secreted listeriolysin O (LLO). Each sample

(100 µL) was incubated at room temperature with DTT (5 µL, 0.1M) for 15 min. A positive control (0.1% Triton X-100) and a negative control (blank BHI media) were included for each experiment. After incubation, samples were serially diluted using hemolysis buffer containing: dibasic sodium phosphate (35 mM) and sodium chloride (125 mM) brought to pH 5.5 with acetic acid. Defibrinated sheep’s blood (Hemostat Laboratories) was diluted to a hematocrit of 2% and then added to each sample for a final hematocrit of 1%. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After incubation, all samples were spun down at 2000 RPM for 5 min to pellet intact blood cells. Supernatant lysate (120 µL) was transferred to a flat bottom 96-well plate for OD measurement at 541 nm as an indicator of

LLO activity. Hemolytic unit was calculated as the inverse of the dilution factor at which half complete lysis using 0.4% Triton X-100 occurred and subsequently normalized with original culture OD measured at absorbance at 600 nm.

Samples that did not produce lysis at a level more than half of complete lysis were designated as “Below Detection” for their hemolytic units. Supernatant samples from anaerobic cultures typically generate activities at or slightly above

“Below Detection” levels.

125

LLO Immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting Analysis: Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used to perform SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting Analysis.

Cultures were normalized to OD (600nm) using BHI media. Pellet samples were frozen (-20°) and supernatant samples were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid at 4° for 1 hour. Following supernatant protein precipitation, a cold acetone wash was performed. Both the pellet and supernatant samples were resuspended in 12µL of 2x sample buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min after which it was separated by SDS-PAGE. Following separation immunoblots were performed using anti-LLO rabbit antibody (abcam® ab43018) followed by goat- anti-rabbit HRP antibody (abcam® ab6721).

Actin Co-localization by Immunofluorescence Microscopy

RAW264.7 macrophages were plated onto sterile coverslips (18 by 18 mm) inside 6-well plates at 1 million cells per well one day prior to infections. L. monocytogenes overnight cultures were washed twice and diluted in cell culture media for infection at a MOI of 10. At 2 hours post infection (hpi), coverslips were fixed in paraformaldehyde (3.7% in PBS) overnight at 4°C. For immunofluorescence microscopy, each coverslip was washed with TBS-T (25

126 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100) and blocked with TBS-T with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Anti-L. monocytogenes serum (1:500 in TBS-T with

1% BSA; Thermo Scientific PA1-30487) was added onto each coverslip and incubated at room temperature overnight. Each coverslip was washed in 5 ml of

TBS-T prior to incubation with secondary antibodies, phalloidin-iFluor 594 (1:400, abcam ab176757) and AlexaFluor 488-goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:400, abcam ab150077), in TBS-T with 1% BSA. One hundred intracellular bacteria per experimental replicate were scored visually for the presence or absence of actin clouds.

Quantification of Intracellular ATP

Intracellular ATP levels were quantified using a Molecular Probes™ ATP determination kit. Samples were prepared according to manufacturer’s suggested protocol. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were washed and resuspended with PBS to a final concentration of 108 CFU/ml. Washed bacterial cells were incubated in a dry heating block at 100°C for 5 minutes to release intracellular ATP. Samples were then centrifuged briefly at 10,000 RPM to pellet any intact cells. Supernatant from each sample (10 µL) was placed in a black 96- well plate with 90 µL of reaction master mix (double deionized H2O reaction buffer, DTT, D-Luciferin, and firefly luciferase as described in manufacturer’s protocol). Bioluminescence was measured by a BioTek Synergy 4 plate reader.

127

L2 Fibroblast plaque assay

L2 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and allowed to form a monolayer for

72 hours. On day of infection, 1 mL of overnight L. monocytogenes cultures were washed and resuspended in 100 µL of DPBS. Monolayers were washed three times with DPBS and were infected with 1 mL per well of fresh DMEM containing

6 µL of L. monocytogenes suspension. At 1 hpi, the cells were covered with a 3 mL mixture of DMEM containing 10 µg/mL gentamicin and 0.7% agarose. Plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 72 hours. Following incubation, wells were stained with neutral red for one hour followed by PBS washes. Plaque diameters were measured using the ruler function in GIMP software.

Author Contributions:

Conceptualization, N.W. and Y.S.; Methodology, All; Validation, All;

Formal Analysis, N.W. and Y.S.; Investigation, All; Resources, Y.S.; Writing-

Original Draft Preparation, N.W. and Y.S.; Writing-Review & Editing, N.W. and

Y.S.; Visualization, All; Supervision, Y.S.; Project Administration, Y.S.; Funding

Acquisition, Y.S.

128

Funding:

This research was funded by American Heart Association

(16GRNT27260219). E.R. and N.W. were supported by the University of Dayton

Graduate Student Summer Fellowship. Y.S. was supported by the University of

Dayton Research Council, Hanley Sustainability Institute, and Department of

Biology.

Acknowledgments: N/A

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Albenberg, Lindsey, Tatiana V. Esipova, Colleen P. Judge, et al. 2014 Correlation Between Intraluminal Oxygen Gradient and Radial Partitioning of Intestinal Microbiota. Gastroenterology 147(5): 1055–1063.e8.

Angelidis, Apostolos S., and Gary M. Smith

129 2003 Role of the Glycine Betaine and Carnitine Transporters in Adaptation of Listeria Monocytogenes to Chill Stress in Defined Medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69(12): 7492–7498.

Burkholder, Kristin M., and Arun K. Bhunia 2010 Listeria Monocytogenes Uses Listeria Adhesion Protein (LAP) to Promote Bacterial Transepithelial Translocation and Induces Expression of LAP Receptor Hsp60. Infection and Immunity 78(12): 5062–5073.

Burkholder, Kristin M., Kwang-Pyo Kim, Krishna K. Mishra, et al. 2009 Expression of LAP, a SecA2-Dependent Secretory Protein, Is Induced under Anaerobic Environment. Microbes and Infection 11(10): 859–867.

Cartwright, Emily J., Kelly A. Jackson, Shacara D. Johnson, et al. 2013 Listeriosis Outbreaks and Associated Food Vehicles, United States, 1998- 2008. Emerging Infectious Diseases 19(1): 1–9; quiz 184.

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 N.d. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172. 350&SearchTerm=fumaric%20acid, accessed November 5, 2018.

Dykes, G. A., and S. M. Moorhead 2000 Survival of Osmotic and Acid Stress by Listeria Monocytogenes Strains of Clinical or Meat Origin. International Journal of Food Microbiology 56(2–3): 161– 166.

Fisher, Elaine M., Mahmood Khan, Ronald Salisbury, and Periannan Kuppusamy 2013 Noninvasive Monitoring of Small Intestinal Oxygen in a Rat Model of Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 67(2): 451–459.

Fumarase Deficiency | Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD) – an NCATS Program N.d. https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/6476/fumarase-deficiency, accessed November 5, 2018.

Lee, Kang-Mu, Yongjin Park, Wasimul Bari, et al. 2012 Activation of Cholera Toxin Production by Anaerobic Respiration of Trimethylamine N-Oxide in Vibrio Cholerae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 287(47): 39742–39752.

Light, Samuel H., Lin Su, Rafael Rivera-Lugo, et al. 2018 A Flavin-Based Extracellular Electron Transfer Mechanism in Diverse Gram-Positive Bacteria. Nature 562(7725): 140.

Linke, Kristina, Irene Rückerl, Katharina Brugger, et al.

130 2014 Reservoirs of Listeria Species in Three Environmental Ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80(18): 5583–5592.

Müller-Herbst, Stefanie, Stefanie Wüstner, Anna Mühlig, et al. 2014 Identification of Genes Essential for Anaerobic Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes. Microbiology (Reading, England) 160(Pt 4): 752–765.

Oh, Young Taek, Kang-Mu Lee, Wasimul Bari, et al. 2016 Cholera Toxin Production Induced upon Anaerobic Respiration Is Suppressed by Glucose Fermentation in Vibrio Cholerae. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 26(3): 627–636.

Orsi, Renato H., Teresa M. Bergholz, Martin Wiedmann, and Kathryn J. Boor 2015 The Listeria Monocytogenes Strain 10403S BioCyc Database. Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation 2015.

Podolak, R. K., J. F. Zayas, C. L. Kastner, and D. Y. C. Fung 1996 Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes and Escherichia Coli O157:H7 on Beef by Application of Organic Acids. Journal of Food Protection 59(4): 370–373.

Romick, T. L., H. P. Fleming, and R. F. McFeeters 1996 Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes in Defined Glucose Medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(1): 304–307.

Sullivan, Lucas B., Eva Martinez-Garcia, Hien Nguyen, et al. 2013 The Proto-Oncometabolite Fumarate Binds Glutathione to Amplify ROS- Dependent Signaling. Molecular Cell 51(2): 236–248.

Tango, Charles Nkufi, Ahmad Rois Mansur, and Deog-Hwan Oh 2015 Fumaric Acid and Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water Inactivate Gram Positive and Gram Negative Foodborne Pathogens. Microorganisms 3(1): 34–46.

Thiennimitr, Parameth, Sebastian E. Winter, Maria G. Winter, et al. 2011 Intestinal Inflammation Allows Salmonella to Use Ethanolamine to Compete with the Microbiota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(42): 17480–17485.

Trivett, T. L., and E. A. Meyer 1971 Citrate Cycle and Related Metabolism of Listeria Monocytogenes. Journal of Bacteriology 107(3): 770–779.

Tyrakis, Petros A., Marie E. Yurkovich, Marco Sciacovelli, et al. 2017 Fumarate Hydratase Loss Causes Combined Respiratory Chain Defects. Cell Reports 21(4): 1036–1047.

USDA ERS - Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses

131 N.d. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne- illnesses/, accessed April 23, 2018.

Vivant, Anne-Laure, Dominique Garmyn, and Pascal Piveteau 2013 Listeria Monocytogenes, a down-to-Earth Pathogen. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3842520/, accessed November 2, 2018.

Walker, S. J., P. Archer, and J. G. Banks 1990 Growth of Listeria Monocytogenes at Refrigeration Temperatures. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology 68(2): 157–162.

Wallace, Nathan, Eric Newton, Elizabeth Abrams, Ashley Zani, and Yvonne Sun 2017 Metabolic Determinants in Listeria Monocytogenes Anaerobic Listeriolysin O Production. Archives of Microbiology: 1–11.

Winter, Sebastian E., Parameth Thiennimitr, Maria G. Winter, et al. 2010 Gut Inflammation Provides a Respiratory Electron Acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 467(7314): 426–429.

Yang, Ming, Tomoyoshi Soga, Patrick J. Pollard, and Julie Adam 2012 The Emerging Role of Fumarate as an Oncometabolite. Frontiers in Oncology 2: 85.

132 CHAPTER V

EVALUATING THE IMPORTANCE OF MENAQUINONE BIOSYNTHESIS IN

LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES VIRULENCE REGULATION

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a facultative intracellular pathogen and causative agent of the foodborne disease, listeriosis. L. monocytogenes is ubiquitous and must persist and grow in environments with varying levels of oxygen ranging from the soil to the human intestine. However, most of our understanding of L. monocytogenes pathogenesis comes from work done in the presence of oxygen, completely leaving out the anaerobic phase of infection. In this study we evaluated the importance of (menB), a gene involved in menaquinone biosynthesis, L. monocytogenes pathogenesis. Additionally, our previous work has shown that the supplementation of exogenous fumarate can stimulate respiratory activity and enhance anaerobic pathogenesis, and this study shows that MenB may be involved in the effect of fumarate on pathogenesis of both aerobic and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes.

133 Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a Gram-positive foodborne pathogen capable of causing the invasive disease, listeriosis. As a facultative pathogen, L. monocytogenes must be able to adapt and respond to various oxygen conditions, especially when transmitting through the gastrointestinal tract

(Albenberg et al. 2014). However, the majority of research on L. monocytogenes takes advantage of standard aerobic culturing techniques, which creates a knowledge gap in the importance of anaerobic conditions during L. monocytogenes infection. Limited research points to the increased adherence and initial infection from anaerobically cultured L. monocytogenes compared to aerobic (Burkholder and Bhunia 2010; Burkholder et al. 2009; Wallace et al.

2017). However, the actual molecular underpinnings of this differential anaerobic response have yet to be determined. Our lab previously explored the importance of central carbon metabolism and respiratory activity as potential points for virulence regulation to take place, and this research aims to further explore the importance of respiratory activity by evaluating the importance of genes involved in electron transport.

The electron transport chain (ETC) consists of a series of oxidation reactions which move electrons through various intermediates with the ultimate goal of generating a proton gradient to drive the production of ATP through ATP synthase. This process has been linked to successful production of virulence

134 factors in other pathogens. Staphylococcus aureus mutants who lack a functional electron transport chain are incapable of producing hemolysins, eukocidins, and the antioxidant staphyloxanthin. However, stimulation of ETC activity in those mutants led to restoration of virulence factor production. Additionally, stimulation of Enterococcus faecalis ETC activity led to restoration of catalase activity

(Painter et al. 2017). Although eukaryotic, Aspergillus fumigates mutants with impaired ETC displayed attenuated virulence in a mouse model of infection

(Grahl et al. 2012). In order to evaluate the importance of the ETC in L. monocytogenes pathogenesis, we used mutants lacking key components of the

ETC and evaluated their subsequent growth and pathogenesis. Our data show that one component of menaquinone biosynthesis, MenB, is important in growth and pathogenesis.

Results

Intermediate in menaquinone biosynthesis is important in L. monocytogenes response to fumarate

As a means of further understanding the importance of respiratory activity in L. monocytogenes virulence regulation, overnight cultures of various mutants lacking components of the electron transport chain were grown in either presence or absence of oxygen as well as exogenous fumarate (Supplementary

Figure 1). Previous work in our lab successfully demonstrated that

135 supplementation of fumarate to anaerobic, overnight cultures led to increased respiratory activity and culture optical density. However, overnight growth of the

∆MenB mutant led to significantly decreased aerobic growth both with and without fumarate (Figure 1A) and the anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes showed no increase in growth when fumarate supplementation (Figure 1B). As a means of understanding if the changes in overnight growth in the ∆MenB strain were because of media acidification, we measured the culture pH. Under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions there was no significant change in pH between no supplement WT and ∆MenB, and fumarate supplementation led to an increase in pH in both strains with ∆MenB having a slightly smaller increase

(Figure 1 C,D). To ascertain if the ∆MenB growth defect was associated with a change in central carbon metabolism we measured the production of acetoin.

When cultured aerobically, the ∆MenB strain produced very little acetoin independent of fumarate supplementation (Figure 1E). Anaerobically grown

∆MenB did not show the characteristic increase in acetoin production when supplemented with fumarate shown in WT (Figure 1F). These results suggest that MenB may be mediating L. monocytogenes response to exogenous fumarate supplementation potentially through modulation of central carbon metabolism.

136 A Aerobic B Anaerobic No Supplement 50mM Fumarate No Supplement 50mM Fumarate 1.2 NS 0.8 * 0.7 1 NS

0.6 m

0.8 m n

n 0.5

0

0 0

0.6 0 0.4 6

NS 6 D

0.4 D 0.3 O O 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0 WT ∆menB WT ∆MenB

C Aerobic D Anaerobic 7.00 6.00 *** *** *** 6.00 * 5.00 5.00 4.00

4.00 H

H 3.00 p 3.00 p 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 WT ∆MenB WT ∆MenB E Aerobic F Anaerobic 3 NS 1.6 *** 2.5 1.4 1.2

2

/

]

/

m

] m

n 1

n

i

n

n

i

0

o

0

t

o 0

t 1.5 0

e 0.8

6

e

6

c

c

D

a

D

[

a [ O 0.6 O 1 0.4 0.5 NS 0.2 NS 0 0 WT ∆menB WT ∆menB

FFigureigure 1: 5.An1:a eAnaerobicrobic growt hgrowth increas increasee with fum witharate fumaratesupplemen supplementationtation abolished in tabolishedhe ∆MenB in sthetrain ∆MenB possibl ystrain due to possibly manipula tdueion o tof t hmanipulatione fate of pyruv aofte .the A,B fate) Cul tofure pyruvate OD600nm. wA,B)as ta Cultureken in both WT and ∆MenB strain grown with or without oxygen and fumarate. C,D) Overnight culture OD600nm was taken in both WT and ∆MenB strain grown with or without oxygen and supernatant was taken for pH measurement. E,F) Supernatant from overnight cultures was taken to qfumarate.uantify ace toC,D)in pr oOvernightduction. Re culturepresent asupernatanttive of three in wasdepe takenndent e forxpe pHrim emeasurement.nts done in triplic E,F).ate ar e pRepresentativelotted with error b aofrs threerepres independententing standar dexperiments deviation and done statis tiincs triplicatewere perf oarerme plottedd using awi twtho -error tabarsiled s representingtudent’s t-test w standardith signific deviationant differen andces instatisticsdicated b ywere aster iperformedsks (*p<.05 *using** p<. 0a0 1two NS-=tailedNot Sstudent’significant ) t-test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<.05 *** p<.001 NS=Not Significant )

Figure 5.2: MenB is critical for aerobic LLO production and intracellular fitnessFigure 5.1: Anaerobic growth increase with fumarate supplementation abolished in the ∆MenB strain possibly due to manipulation of the fate of pyruvate. A,B) Culture OD600nm was taken in both WT and ∆MenB strain grown with or without oxygen and fumarate. C,D) Overnight culture137 supernatant was taken for pH measurement. E,F). Representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t-test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<.05 *** p<.001 NS=Not Significant ) MenB is important for aerobic LLO production and intracellular growth

Previous work in our lab demonstrated that supplementation of fumarate to aerobically and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes led to an increase in the production of the pore-forming toxin, listeriolysin O (LLO). Because we saw marked changes in ∆MenB response to fumarate in regard to growth and acetoin production we wanted to see if there were similar differences in LLO production and subsequent intracellular growth. Interestingly, deletion of MenB led to a bifurcated response in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Aerobically grown

∆MenB showed undetectable production of LLO independent of fumarate supplementation (Figure 2A), whereas anaerobically cultured ∆MenB showed increased LLO production when compared to anaerobic WT and fumarate enhanced LLO production in both WT and ∆MenB (Figure 2B). This response could indicate that there are different signals regulating MenB involvement in the production of LLO under different oxygen conditions. Previously we identified increased intracellular fitness of aerobically cultured L. monocytogenes when compared to anaerobically cultured L. monocytogenes. To test if the importance of MenB during intracellular growth we infected RAW264.7 macrophages with the

∆MenB strain and performed an 8-hour intracellular growth curve. Interestingly, deletion of MenB led to decreased intracellular fitness of aerobically grown L. monocytogenes compared to anaerobically grown (Figure 2C). This is another example of a bifurcated response with the ∆MenB strain between different oxygen conditions, which may mean that MenB is far more important in aerobic

138 virulence regulation compared to anaerobic virulence regulation.

A Aerobic B Anaerobic No Supplement 50mM Fumarate No Supplement 50mM Fumarate

400 *** 40

t

t n

n *** e

350 e 35

m

m

e

e

l

l y

300 y 30

t

p

t

p

i

i

p

p

v

v

i

i

u

u

t

t

c

c S

250 S 25

A

A

o

o

c

c

i

i

N

N

t

t

200 20

y

y

T

T

l

l

o

o

W

W

150 15

m

m

c

c

i

i

e

e

b

b

H

H o

100 o 10

r

r

e

e A

50 A 5

%

% ( BD BD ( BD 0 0 WT ∆MenB WT ∆MenB C Aerobic ∆MenB Anaerobic ∆MenB Aerobic ∆MenB+50mM Fumarate Anaerobic ∆MenB+50mM Fumarate 60

50

*** U

F 40

C

)

r

t

a

u

l

p

u l

n 30

l

i

e

%

c

( a

r 20

t

n I 10 NS

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (h) Figure 2: MenB is critical for aerobic LLO production and intracellular fitness. A,B) Supernatant from overnight cultures of both WT and ∆MenB grown both aerobically and anaerobically with and without Figurefuma r5.at2:e w MenBas take nis a ncriticald a hem oforlyti caerobic assay wa LLOs perf oproductionrmed looking fandor the intracellular production of L LfitnessO. C) ∆M. Aen,B)B Supernatantgrown both fromaerob overnightically, anae rculturesobically, a nofd wbothith o rWT with andout fu ∆MenBmarate w grownas infec bothted in taerobicallyo RAW 264.7 and anaerobicallymacrophage withs and and a su bwithoutsequent ifumaratentracellula rwas grow takenth curv eand was a p ehemolyticrformed. Re assaypresen twasative performedof three lookingindep forend theent eproductionxperiments d ofon eLLO. in trip C)lica ∆teMenB are plo growntted with both error baerobically,ars represen tanaerobically,ing standard dev iandation and withs taortis withouttics were fumarate performed wasusing infected a two-tail eintod stu RAWdent’s t264.7-test w imacrophagesth significant diff eandrenc eas subsequentindicated by asterisks (*** p<.001 NS=Not Significant BD=Below Detection limit of the assay ) intracellular growth curve was performed. Representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t-test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*** p<.001 NS=Not Significant BD=Below Detection limit of the assay )

Supplemental Figure 5.1: Screen of respiratory mutants on the basis of growth, acetoin production and hemolytic activityFigure 5.2: MenB is critical for aerobic LLO production and intracellular fitness. A,B) Supernatant from overnight cultures of both WT and ∆MenB grown both aerobically and anaerobically with and without fumarate was taken and a hemolytic assay was performed looking for the production of LLO. C) ∆MenB grown both aerobically, anaerobically, and with or without fumarate was infected into RAW 264.7 macrophages and a subsequent139 intracellular growth curve was performed. Representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two- tailed student’s t-test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*** p<.001 NS=Not Significant BD=Below Detection limit of the assay )

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

L. monocytogenes strain 10403s was grown from isolated colonies on freshly streaked brain–heart infusion (BHI) plates (<1 week) at 37 °C. All cultures were grown in filter-sterilized BHI media to ensure consistency. Aerobic cultures were grown with agitation at 250 RPM to ensure adequate oxygen diffusion.

Anaerobic cultures were grown in a temperature-controlled incubator inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory, Type A) with a nitrogenous atmosphere containing 2.5% hydrogen. Optical density (OD) was measured in an optically clear 96-well plate at 600 nm with a volume of 200 µL per well using a 96-well plate reader (Biotek Synergy4). Sodium fumarate (Acros Organics) was prepared as 1M stock solution in deionized water, filter-sterilized, and added directly to the media at the desired concentration before inoculation.

Hemolytic assays

Hemolytic assays were performed using supernatant from overnight cultures to measure the activity of listeriolysin O (LLO). Each sample was incubated at room temperature with 0.1 M DTT (5 µL) for 15 min. A positive control (0.4% triton X-100) and a negative control (blank BHI media) were

140 included for each experiment. After incubation, samples were serially diluted using hemolysis buffer containing: dibasic sodium phosphate (35 mM) and sodium chloride (125 mM) brought to pH 5.5 with acetic acid. Defibrinated sheep’s blood (Hemostat Laboratories DSB050) was diluted to a hematocrit of

2% and then added to each sample for a final hematocrit of 1%. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After incubation, all samples were spun down at

2000 RPM for 5 min to pellet intact blood cells. Supernatant lysate (120 µL) was transferred to a flat bottom 96-well plate for OD measurement at 541 nm as an indicator of LLO activity. Hemolytic unit was calculated as the inverse of the dilution factor at which half complete lysis using 0.1% Triton X-100 occurred and subsequently normalized with original culture OD measured at absorbance at

600 nm. Samples that did not produce lysis at a level more than half of complete lysis were designated as “Below Detection” for their hemolytic units. Supernatant samples from anaerobic cultures typically generate activities at or slightly above

“Below Detection” levels.

Acetoin Production

The Voges-Proskauer test (Nicholson 2008) was adapted to quantify acetoin production in the supernatant of overnight L. monocytogenes cultures.

Supernatant or standard (100 µL) was placed into a sterile micro-centrifuge tube followed by additions of 70 µL of .5% creatine monohydrate (Sigma C3630-

100G), 100 µL of 1-Napthol (Sigma N1000-10G), and 100 µL of 40% KOH

141 (Chempure 831-704) in 95% EtOH. Samples were centrifuged between each addition and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes after the final addition. After incubation 200 µL of each sample was placed into a flat bottom

96-well plate and the absorbance was read at 560 nm. A standard curve was constructed to calculate the concentration of acetoin in culture supernatant samples.

Intracellular Growth Curves

Murine peritoneal macrophages RAW264.7 (ATCC TIB-71) were grown in

DMEM (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (JRScientific), HEPES (10 mM), and glutamine (2 mM) in a 37 °C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Prior to infections, cells were seeded in a

24-well tissue culture plate and grown for 14–18 h. Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used for infections at a MOI of 10. Bacteria diluted in cell culture medium were added to each well (500 µL) and incubated for 30 min.

Following incubation, media were aspirated, and cells were washed twice with sterile DPBS. Fresh media (1 mL per well) containing 10 µg/mL gentamicin stock was added to each well. To enumerate intracellular bacteria, cell culture media were aspirated off and sterile 0.1% (v/v) triton X-100 (Fisher BP151-100) was added to each well (200 µL per well) to lyse host cells. Lysates were diluted and spread on LB plates. Colonies on plates were counted using an automatic colony counter (Synbiosis aCOLyte 3) after 24–48 h of incubation in a 37 °C incubator.

142

Discussion

In this study we set out to better understand the importance of the ETC in

L. monocytogenes virulence regulation both with and without oxygen. After screening many mutants for growth, acetoin production, and hemolytic activity

(Supplementary Figure 1), we chose to specifically highlight the ∆MenB mutant due to its strong bifurcated response to both oxygen and exogenous fumarate.

Overnight growth of the ∆MenB mutant was significantly attenuated in aerobic but not anaerobic growth, but both oxygen conditions showed no significant response to exogenous fumarate supplementation. These differences were not due to pH, but there was a significant effect on the production of acetoin both aerobically and anaerobically. MenB deletion led to no acetoin production aerobically and anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes supplemented with fumarate did not display enhanced acetoin production. Furthermore, deletion of

MenB led to attenuated LLO production and intracellular growth of aerobically cultured L. monocytogenes. Thus, we demonstrated the importance of menaquinone biosynthesis in L. monocytogenes growth and pathogenesis.

MenB is an enzyme in the shikimate biosynthesis pathway that catalyzes the conversion of O-succinlybenzoyl-CoA (OSB-CoA) to 1,4-dihydroxy-2- napthoate (DNHA), which is necessary for cytosolic survival and the lack of it leads to increased bacteriolysis (Chen et al. 2017). This is not unique to L.

143 monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus menaquinone biosynthesis is necessary for survival and resistance to haem toxicity (Wakeman et al. 2012). We believe it is possible that the decreased intracellular growth of aerobically cultured L. monocytogenes may be due to increased bacteriolysis. Therefore, it is clear that there are downstream effects of shikamate biosynthesis beyond just the production of menaquinones. Due to the complete ablation of acetoin production in the aerobically cultured MenB mutant we believe this indicates that MenB may be involved in central carbon metabolism. Further investigation into the role of

MenB in L. monocytogenes virulence regulation is warranted as a means of better understanding its importance during infection.

Acknowledgments

N. Wallace is supported in part by the University of Dayton office for

Graduate Academic Affairs through the Graduate Student Summer Fellowship

Program, the University of Dayton College of Arts and Sciences, and the

Department of Biology. A special thanks goes to Dr. John-Demian Sauer for providing us with the respiratory mutants.

References

Albenberg, Lindsey, Tatiana V. Esipova, Colleen P. Judge, et al. 2014 Correlation Between Intraluminal Oxygen Gradient and Radial Partitioning of Intestinal Microbiota. Gastroenterology 147(5): 1055–1063.e8.

144

Burkholder, Kristin M., and Arun K. Bhunia 2010 Listeria Monocytogenes Uses Listeria Adhesion Protein (LAP) to Promote Bacterial Transepithelial Translocation and Induces Expression of LAP Receptor Hsp60. Infection and Immunity 78(12): 5062–5073.

Burkholder, Kristin M., Kwang-Pyo Kim, Krishna K. Mishra, et al. 2009 Expression of LAP, a SecA2-Dependent Secretory Protein, Is Induced under Anaerobic Environment. Microbes and Infection 11(10): 859–867.

Chen, Grischa Y., Courtney E. McDougal, Marc A. D’Antonio, Jonathan L. Portman, and John-Demian Sauer 2017 A Genetic Screen Reveals That Synthesis of 1,4-Dihydroxy-2-Naphthoate (DHNA), but Not Full-Length Menaquinone, Is Required for Listeria Monocytogenes Cytosolic Survival. mBio 8(2): e00119-17.

Grahl, Nora, Taisa Magnani Dinamarco, Sven D. Willger, Gustavo H. Goldman, and Robert A. Cramer 2012 Aspergillus Fumigatus Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain Mediates Oxidative Stress Homeostasis, Hypoxia Responses and Fungal Pathogenesis. Molecular Microbiology 84(2): 383–399.

Nicholson, Wayne L. 2008 The Bacillus Subtilis ydjL (bdhA) Gene Encodes Acetoin Reductase/2,3- Butanediol Dehydrogenase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(22): 6832–6838.

Painter, Kimberley L., Alex Hall, Kam Pou Ha, and Andrew M. Edwards 2017 The Electron Transport Chain Sensitizes Staphylococcus Aureus and Enterococcus Faecalis to the Oxidative Burst. Infection and Immunity 85(12). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695107/.

Wakeman, Catherine A., Neal D. Hammer, Devin L. Stauff, et al. 2012 Menaquinone Biosynthesis Potentiates Haem Toxicity in Staphylococcus Aureus. Molecular Microbiology 86(6): 1376–1392.

Wallace, Nathan, Eric Newton, Elizabeth Abrams, Ashley Zani, and Yvonne Sun 2017 Metabolic Determinants in Listeria Monocytogenes Anaerobic Listeriolysin O Production. Archives of Microbiology: 1–11.

145 Supplementary Figure

A Aerobic B Anaerobic No Supplement 50mM Fumarate 1.2 No Supplement 50mM Fumarate 1 0.9 0.8

m 0.8 0.7

n m

0 0.6 n

0 0.6 0

6 0.5

0 D

0.4 6 0.4 O D 0.3 0.2 O 0.2 0 0.1 0 S A B H B A A N n n p A x x e e t d o o S A B H B A A m m a y q q N n n tp A x x ∆ ∆ ∆ c ∆ ∆ e e a d o o ∆ + m m ∆ y q q ∆ ∆ c ∆ ∆ B ∆ + A B yd A c C D yd ∆ c Aerobic ∆ 9 Anaerobic 7 8

6 7

/

]

m

/

] n

m 6 n

5 i

n

n

0 i

o 5

t

0 0

o 4

t

e 0

6 4

e

c 6

3 D c

A 3

D

[

A O

[ 2 O 2 1 1 0 0

T A B H B A B T A B H B A B n n p A x A n n p A x A W e e t d o W e e t d o a y q yd a y q yd m m ∆ c ∆ c m m ∆ c ∆ c E ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ F ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ + + A A x Anaerobic x o o q q

Aerobic ∆ 200 ∆

) t

600 n 180

)

t e

n 160 m

e 500

y t

e 140

i

l

m

y

v

t

p

i i

e 400 120

t

l

v

p

c

i

p t

u 100

A

p

c

300 S

c

u 80

A

i

o

t

S

c

y i 60

200 N

l

t

o

y

o c

l 40

i

N

o m

100 b 20

T

e

o

m

r

H W e 0

0 e

H

A

%

( T A B H B A B T A B H B A B T x n n p A x A W n n tp A o A W e e t d o d e e a d q d a W y y m m ∆ y q y m m ∆ c ∆ c ∆ ∆ c ∆ c ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ %

+ ( + A A x x o o q q ∆ ∆ Supplmentary Figure 1: Screen of respiratory mutants on the basis of growth, acetoin production and hemolytic activity. A,B) Culture OD600nm was taken in both WT mutant strains grown with or without oxygen aSupplementalnd fumarate. C,D )Figure Superna 5.ta1:nt frScreenom overn ofigh respiratoryt cultures was tmutantsaken to qu aonnti fythe ace basistoin pro ofdu cgrowth,tion. E,F) Sacetoinupernata nproductiont samples we rande tak ehemolyticn and assay eactivityd for LLO. pA,B)rodu cCulturetion usin gOD600nm as hemolyt iwasc ass atakeny. Rep inre sbothentat ive of thWTree mutantindepen dstrainsent exp egrownriments with done or in twithoutriplicate aoxygenre plotte dand with fumarate. error bars r eC,D)prese Supernatantnting standard dfromeviat ion. overnight cultures was taken to quantify acetoin production. E,F) Supernatant samples were taken and assayed for LLO production using as hemolytic assay. Representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation.

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysisSupplemental Figure 5.1: Screen of respiratory mutants on the basis of growth, acetoin production and hemolytic activity. A,B) Culture OD600nm was taken in both WT mutant strains grown with or without oxygen and fumarate. C,D) Supernatant from overnight cultures was taken to quantify acetoin production. E,F) Supernatant146 samples were taken and assayed for LLO production using as hemolytic assay. Representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation.

CHAPTER VI

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The aim of my dissertation research was to gain a better understanding of the effect of anaerobic conditions on Listeria monocytogenes virulence regulation. I approached understanding this effect by measuring the effect of strict anaerobic culture on the production of a key virulence factor in L. monocytogenes, LLO, intracellular growth using various cultured cell lines, and various other biochemical and molecular techniques. Due to the inherent difference in metabolic function between aerobic and anaerobic growth of L. monocytogenes, I wanted to establish a connection between metabolic activity and subsequent pathogenesis. I showed that exogenous supplementation of

TCA cycle intermediates to anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes led to an increase in the production of LLO. We also identified an intracellular growth defect for anaerobically cultured L. monocytogenes during subsequent infection.

We hypothesized that decreased respiratory activity in anaerobically cultured L. monocytogenes was responsible for the intracellular growth defect. We stimulated respiratory activity in anaerobically cultured L. monocytogenes by supplying exogenous fumarate, an alternative electron acceptor. The stimulation

147 of respiratory activity alleviated the intracellular growth defect, highlighting the importance of respiratory activity in subsequent intracellular infection. Based on these findings we then evaluated the importance of several genes associated with menaquinone biosynthesis and electron transport. We identified the necessity of MenB in the success of L. monocytogenes intracellular growth when cultured aerobically but not anaerobically. This finding further supports the importance of respiratory activity in the success of L. monocytogenes infection.

This dissertation provides the framework for further exploration into the connection between metabolic activity and pathogenesis for L. monocytogenes.

148 APPENDIX I

The Effect of Oxygen on Hly Transcript

Rationale: The aim of these experiments was to characterize the effects of both oxygen conditions as well as fumarate supplementation on the transcriptional activity and stability of hly-the gene, which codes for LLO. Additionally, a mutant

L. monocytogenes containing an IPTG inducible promoter was used to control the transcription oh hly. This mutant was used as a means of understanding if fumarate supplementation effects LLO production through hly transcription.

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis

Gene F Primer R primer Tablehly A1.1 Primer5' - C CdesignG GAA C usedTT ACC for AC TqRT TGT- PCRGAA - analysis3' 5' - ACT ATA TTT CGG ATA AAG CGT GGT - 3' gyrA 5' - CCC AAC TGC TGG GAT GAT TAT GGG A - 3' 5' - GGC AAT ACG TTC AAC TAG GCG TGC - 3'

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR149 analysis

Table A1.1 Primer design used for qRT-PCR analysis Figure A1.1: Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes shows increased hly transcript activity and stability but does not result in increased LLO protein abundance. A) Overnight cultures of a hly-gus reporter strain Listeria were grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate and subsequent fluorescence was quantified. B) RNA was isolated and purified from overnight cultures of Listeria grown aerobically or anaerobically with or without fumarate. It was then reverse transcribed, and the resulting cDNA was used for qPCR. C) Hemolytic activity was measured from overnight cultures of Listeria grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate in both WT and iLLO strains. D) Western blot showing LLO protein abundance for Listeria grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate. (NS= No Supplement, FUM= 50mM Fumarate, iLLO= inducible LLO promoter strain, +O2 = aerobic, -O2= anaerobic. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001)

Figure A1.1: Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes shows increased hly Methods:transcript activity and stability but does not result in increased LLO protein abundance. A) Overnight cultures of a hly-gus reporter strain Listeria were grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate and subsequent fluorescence was quantified. B) RNA was isolated and purified from overnight cultures of Listeria grown aerobically or anaerobically with or without fumarate. It was then reverse transcribed, RNAand theExtract resultingion cDNA and wasPurification used for qPCR. C) Hemolytic activity was measured from overnight cultures of Listeria grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate in both WT and iLLO strains. D) Western blot showing LLO protein abundance for Listeria grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate. (NS= No RNASupplement, extraction FUM= was 50mM performed Fumarate, using iLLO= amresco® inducible LLO RiboZol™ promoter strain, (N580 +O-30ML)2 = reagent aerobic, -O2= anaerobic. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with accordingsignificant differencesto manufacturer’s indicated byprotocol. asterisks Bacterial (*p<0.05 ** cells p<.01 were *** p<.001) homogenized with a

Figure A1.1: Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes150 shows increased hly transcript activity and stability but does not result in increased LLO protein abundance. A) Overnight cultures of a hly-gus reporter strain Listeria were grown aerobically, anaerobically, with, or without fumarate and subsequent fluorescence was BeadBug® microtube homogenizer using lysing matrix B (MP Biomedicals 6911-

100) 4x each sample for 40 seconds at maximum speed. Samples were kept on ice between runs 2 and 3 for 40 seconds. The RNA was then purified further including an on-column DNA digestion using an RNeasy® kit (Qiagen Cat. No.

74106) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The final product was eluted with RNase free water and the concentration was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.

cDNA synthesis and qPCR

cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (OPTIZYME™ Fisher BP81045) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using 1µg of RNA and 1µM of reverse primer. A no RT control was included for each sample where the M-MLV was replaced with RNase free water. qPCRs were set up using Power SYBR® Green PCR master mix (applied biosystems® ref. no. 4367659) with 1µg of cDNA as a template and primer sets with a final concentration of 1µM. Reactions (40 cycles of 95° for 15s and 60° for

60s) were performed in an Applied biosystems StepOne Plus™ and analyzed using StepOne software v2.3. The transcript levels of gyrA a gene coding for the

DNA gyrase subunit A were used as a normalizer.

151 MUG Assay

The L. monocytogenes reporter strain (Phly-gus-neo) was generously provided by Dr. Nancy Freitag at University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago to establish transcriptional responses of hly to propionate. The reporter strain was grown on LB plates with neomycin sulfate (1 µg/mL). Colonies were selected and used to inoculate into BHI with or without propionate for growth overnight. Optical density (OD) of the overnight cultures was measured for normalization. The bacteria (1 mL) were harvested by centrifugation at 4 ◦C, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in 100 µL of PBS with 1% Triton-X100. Bacterial cells were then lysed using a sonicator for three 30-s cycles. Samples were put on ice between each cycle. The lysate samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 ◦C, and the resulting 100 µL of supernatant was collected into a 96-well plate. In the dark, 20 µL of 4-Methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide solution (1.8 mg/mL MUG; AAB21190MD, Fisher Scientific) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37 ◦C. After 10 min, 10 µL of 0.2 M sodium carbonate was added as a stop solution in the dark. Fluorescence was measured at 365 nm excitation wavelength and 400 nm emission wavelength using a 96-well plate reader (Synergy4, Biotek).

152 LLO Immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting Analysis: Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes were used to perform SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting Analysis.

Cultures were normalized to OD (600nm) using BHI media. Pellet samples were frozen (-20°) and supernatant samples were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid at 4° for 1 hour. Following supernatant protein precipitation, a cold acetone wash was performed. Both the pellet and supernatant samples were resuspended in 12µL of 2x sample buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min after which it was separated by SDS-PAGE. Following separation immunoblots were performed using anti-LLO rabbit antibody (abcam® ab43018) followed by goat- anti-rabbit HRP antibody (abcam® ab6721).

Acknowledgments: I am thankful to Dr. Nancy Freitag for sharing phly-GUS and Dr. Mary O’Riordan for the iLLO strains of L. monocytogenes. I am also grateful to Erica Rinehart for performing the studies using the phly-GUS mutant.

153 APPENDIX II

Evaluation of Redox Homeostasis in Listeria monocytogenes

Rationale: The aim of these experiments was to characterize the differences in redox balance between L. monocytogenes grown aerobically or anaerobically.

Redox balance measurements indicated that anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes was experiencing oxidative stress. We discovered that anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes displayed no catalase activity and this led to a subsequent increase in killing when exposed to hydrogen peroxide.

154 Figure A2.1 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibit increased oxidative stress and increased susceptibility to killing by H2O2 due to lack of catalase activity. A) Overnight cultures of Listeria were grown in the presence and absence of oxygen and the ratio of NAD:NADH was calculated. B) Catalase activity was measured by measuring he height of bubbles resulting from the addition of hydrogen peroxide to Listeria was measured. C) Listeria was challenged with .4% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes and the surviving bacteria were calculated as a percent survival compared to the starting concentration. D) Image showing the formations of bubbles with the addition of hydeogen peroxide to Listeria cultures grown under different conditions. NS= No Supplement, FUM= 50mM Fumarate,+O2 = aerobic, -O2= anaerobic. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing standard deviation and statistics were performed using a two-tailed student’s t test with significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05 , *** p<.001)

Me thods

Figure A2.1 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes exhibit increased oxidative stress and increased susceptibility to killing by H2O2 due to lack of catalase activity. A) Overnight cultures of Listeria were grown in the presence and absence of oxygen and NAD/NADHthe ratio of NAD:NADH Quantification was calculated. B) Catalase activity was measured by measuring he height of bubbles resulting from the addition of hydrogen peroxide to Listeria was measured. C) Listeria was challenged with .4% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes and the surviving bacteria were calculated as a percent survival compared to the starting concentration. D) Image showing the formations of bubbles with the addition of hydeogen peroxide to Listeria The concentration of NAD and NADH was determined by using an cultures grown under different conditions. NS= No Supplement, FUM= 50mM Fumarate,+O2 = aerobic, -O2= anaerobic. Averages of triplicates are plotted with error bars representing EnzyChrom™standard deviation NAD/NADH and statistics Assay were performedKit from Bioassayusing a two -Systemstailed student’ accordings t test with to the significant differences indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05 , *** p<.001) manufacturer’s suggested protocol. In brief: bacterial samples were

Figure A2.1 Anaerobically grown L. monocytogenes155 exhibit increased oxidative stress and increased susceptibility to killing by H2O2 due to lack of catalase activity. A) Overnight cultures of Listeria were grown in the presence and absence of oxygen and the ratio of NAD:NADH was calculated. B) Catalase activity was measured by measuring he height of bubbles resulting from the addition of hydrogen peroxide to Listeria was measured. homogenized and assayed for [NAD] and [NADH] separately, and the ratio was determined by dividing [NAD] by [NADH].

Catalase Activity Assay

Overnight samples of L. monocytogenes were normalized and subsequently concentrated to 109 CFU/mL. 100µL of the culture suspension was added to 13x100mM glass tubes in addition to 100µL of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 100µL of 1% Triton X-100 detergent. Each sample was thoroughly mixed and the corresponding height of bubble formation was measured to the nearest mm with a ruler.

Survival Assay

Overnight samples of L. monocytogenes were pelleted in microcentrifuge tubes by spinning at 10,000rpm for 3 minutes. The pellets were washed and resuspended in PBS with calcium and magnesium. All samples were diluted and plated on LB agar plates for time point zero. Undiluted samples were incubated with .4% hydrogen peroxide for 30min at 37°C. Following incubation samples were diluted and plated on LB agar plates for time point 30min. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours and colonies were enumerated. The percentage survival was calculated as the number of bacteria present at 30min divided by the number of bacteria at time point zero.

156