DOCSLIB.ORG

THE GREAT LAKES in TUR]Bmlmms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ECO TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE GREAT LAKES IN TUR]Bmlmms Promedings of a 1988 Worbhap Supported by the Cheat Lakes Fishery Commission and fbE Sdenet Advkprjs hard of the hzemtio~~al$&+at CQqlmhh AN E~SYSTEMAPPROACH' .TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE GREAT LAKES IN TURBULENT TIMES Proceedings of a 1988 Workshop Supported by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the Science Advisory Board of the International Joint Commission edited by Clayton J. Edwards USDA Forest Service Rhinelander, Wisconsin 54501 Henry A. Regier Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4 Citation (general): Edwards, C. J. and H .A. Regier, [ED. ] . 1990. An ecosystem approach to the integrity of the Great Lakes in turbulent times. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 90-4. 299 p. Citation (example for individual paper) : Kay, J .J. 1990. A non-equilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity, p. 209-238. In C.J. Edwards and H.A. Regier [ed. 1. An ecosystem approachto the integrity of the Great Lakes in turbulent times. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 90-4. GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Support of this publication by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the Science Advisory Board of the International Joint Commission does not imply that the findings or conclusions contained herein are endorsed by either body. PREFACE A "Workshop on Integrity and Surprise" was convened in Burlington, Ontario, on 14-16 June 1988 under the auspices of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Board of Technical Experts (GLFC/BOTE) and the International Joint Commission's Great Lakes Science Advisory Board (IJC/SAB) . The Workshop was supported by funds from the SAB and BOTE. In addition, the Donner Canadian Foundation supported the contributions of several Canadian collaborators. This workshop was a sequel of two earlier initiatives. One of these was the Ecosystem Approach Workshop, convened in Hiram, Ohio, in 1983 under the auspices of IJC/SAB, GLFC/BOTE, the International Association of Great Lakes Research, and Great Lakes Tomorrow. The other was the third series of Canada-U ..S. Inter-University Seminars (CUSIS 111) of 1983-4, which concluded with a meeting in Racine, Wisconsin. The 1983 Hiram Worksfiop emphasized practical 'aspects of ecosystem politics. The CUSIS Seminars emphasized ecosystemic governance.2 This 1988 Burlington Workshop emphasized scientific and conceptual aspects of ecosystemic policies in the context of great practical uncertainty.---Two working groups were convened to explore the implications for policy and for - theory and testing of ecosystem integrity and surprise -in the Great Lakes basin. With the exception of the introductory paper providing a range of individual perspectives on ecosystem integrity, the papers in these proceedings are categorized according to the two above- mentioned working groups. The first paper in each categojr provides an overview of that working group's discussions and conclusions. - This workshop was organized and convened by a joint committee of the SAB and BOTE. A. P. Lino Grima and Richard A. Ryder represented BOTE; Timothy F. H. Allen and Clayton ' J. R. Vallentyne, "Implementing an Ecosystem Approach to Management of the Great Lakes Basin, Workshop Held at Hiram College, Hiram, Ohio, March 22-24, 1983, Environmental Conservation 10 :3 (1983): 273-274 and W.J. Christie et al., "Managing the Great Lakes as a Home, 'I Journal of Great Lakes Research 12 (1986): 2-17. L.K. Caldwell, [ED. 1, Perspectives on Ecosystem Management for the Great Lakes (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988). iii J. Edwards represented SAB; and Henry A. Regier represented GLFC and SAB. Clayton Edwards and Henry Regier had major editing responsibilities, but all authors assisted with reviewing and editing of papers. Randy L. Eshenroder and Madeline Haslam of GLFC and Martha L. Walter of Ann Arbor, Michigan, helped with the publication process. TABLE OF COlWENTS Preface. .......................iii Perspectives on the Meaning of Ecosystem Integrity in 1975, by Henry A. Regier and Robert L. France ... 1 Implications For Policy Integrity and Surprise in the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem: Implications for Policy, by Henry A. Regier, George R. Francis, A.P. Grim, Andrew L. Hamilton, and Sally Lerner .............. 17 Values in Integrity, by Sally Lerner ......... 37 Rehabilitating Great Lakes Integrity in Times of Surprise, byRafal Serafin. ............ 45 Ecosystem Integrity and Network Theory, by Robert E. Ulanowicz ..................... 69 Integrality, Context, ,and Other Industrial Casualties, by Willem H. Vanderburg. ......... 79 Evaluating the Benefits of Ecosystem Integrity, byWalterE.Westman. ................ 91 Implications for Theory and Testing Integrity and Surprise in the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem: Implications for Theory and Testing, by Lloyd M. Dickie and Bruce L. Bandurski ......105 Integrity and Surprise in the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem: The Perspective Hierarchy Theory, by Timothy F.H. Allen. ................121 Thermodynamics and Ecosystem Integrity, by Joel L.Fisher.......... .............131 Trophic Dynamics and Ecosystem Integrity in the Great Lakes: Past, Present, and Possibilities, by Thomas D. Fontaine and Donald J. Stewart. .....153 Theoretical Framework for Developing and Operationalizing an Index of Zoobenthos Community: Application to Biomonitoring with Zwbenthos Communities in the Great Lakes, by Robert L. France ..............169 Flexible Governance, by Georye Francis ........195 A Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic Framework for Discussing Ecosystem Integrity, by James J. Kay. ...209 Aquatic Harmonic Communities: Surrogates of Ecosystem Integrity, by Richard A. Ryder and Steve R. Kerr. ....................239 Ecological Bases for an Understanding of Ecosystem Integrity in the Great Lakes Basin, by Robert J. Steedman and Henry A. Regier .............257 Political and Ecological Systems: Integrity?, by Edward Cowan, Tom Muir and John R. Vallentyne. ....273 Landscape Ecology: ~nalyticalApproaches to Pattern and Process, by Carol A. Wessman .......285 PERGPECTIVES ON THE MEANING OF ECOSYSTEM IN'I93GRITY IN 1975 Henry A. Regier an8 Robert L. France Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S lA5 ABSTRACT. We have reviewed and analyzed the proceedings of a Symposium on the Integrity of Water convened in 1975 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We presupposed that all the participants had at least some minimal commitment to the purpose of the goal of integrity as specified in the U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. We perceived a spectrum of interpretations of the term integrity and have divided this spectrum'into five classes according to the substance of the goal and supporting strategies with which speakers have invested the term integrity. We have then provided a summary sketch of each of these classes. The word integrity figures prominently in Section 304 of the U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. To clarify the concept of integrity, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency convened a Symposium on the Integrity of Water in Washington, M3 on March 10-12, 1975. The proceedings (U.S. Government Printing Office Stock No. 055-001-01068-1) were published in 1977. The focus of the 1975 Symposium was on the definition and interpretation of water quality integrity as viewed and discussed by representatives from federal and state government agencies, industry, academia, and conservation/environmental groups. Almost all the participants were American. The Symposium was designed to interrelate two concepts of integrity, 1) as a desirable characteristic of natural ecosystems, and 2) as a moral or cultural principle, and then apply this combined concept to the real-world pragmatic use of integrity for setting regulatory practices. During the Symposium, it was noted (by R.B. Robie) that "from ,the many interpretations presented, it can clearly be seen that integrity, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.Ig One way to sort out these differences is to examine the various 'perspectives of the Symposium participants with respect to the degree of refonn deemed necessary to achieve integrity. We discerned five different degrees of refonn from the Symposium proceedings and have excerpted text that we consider to be illustrative of each refonn objective. We then attempt a general characterization of strategies for each objective. The five refonn objectives are: deep refonn, partial refonn, incremental advances, holding the line, and slowing the rate of retreat. For each of the excerpts that follow we have given the name of the symposium participant and the page(s) on which the statement may be found. We have classified the statements, not the participants, who made those statements. We emphasize that a statement taken out of context should not be used to infer the degree of reform to which a speaker might be committed. SYMPOSIUM EXCERPTS RELATED TO FIVE REFORM OBJECTIVES Deep Reform Senator Muskie, in the Senate debate on the conference report: "These policies simply mean that streams and rivers are no longer to be considered part of the waste treatment process." And elsewhere: "This legislation would clearly establish that no one has the right to pollute, that pollution continues because of technological limits, not because of any inherent right to use the nation's waterways for the purpose of disposing of wastes. -- R. Outen, p. 217. The goal of the Act
Recommended publications
  • Hamilton's Heritage Volume 5

    Hamilton's Heritage Volume 5

    HAMILTON’S HERITAGE 5 0 0 2 e n u Volume 5 J Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Hamilton Planning and Development Department Development and Real Estate Division Community Planning and Design Section Whitehern (McQuesten House) HAMILTON’S HERITAGE Hamilton 5 0 0 2 e n u Volume 5 J Old Town Hall Reasons for Designation under Part IV Ancaster of the Ontario Heritage Act Joseph Clark House Glanbrook Webster’s Falls Bridge Flamborough Spera House Stoney Creek The Armoury Dundas Contents Introduction 1 Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the 7 Ontario Heritage Act Former Town of Ancaster 8 Former Town of Dundas 21 Former Town of Flamborough 54 Former Township of Glanbrook 75 Former City of Hamilton (1975 – 2000) 76 Former City of Stoney Creek 155 The City of Hamilton (2001 – present) 172 Contact: Joseph Muller Cultural Heritage Planner Community Planning and Design Section 905-546-2424 ext. 1214 [email protected] Prepared By: David Cuming Natalie Korobaylo Fadi Masoud Joseph Muller June 2004 Hamilton’s Heritage Volume 5: Reasons for Designation Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act Page 1 INTRODUCTION This Volume is a companion document to Volume 1: List of Designated Properties and Heritage Conservation Easements under the Ontario Heritage Act, first issued in August 2002 by the City of Hamilton. Volume 1 comprised a simple listing of heritage properties that had been designated by municipal by-law under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act since 1975. Volume 1 noted that Part IV designating by-laws are accompanied by “Reasons for Designation” that are registered on title.
  • Proteins: a Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics

    Proteins: a Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics

    PROTEINS: A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DYNAMICS, STRUCTURE, AND THERMODYNAMICS CHARLES L. BROOKS I11 Department of Chemistry. Carnegie-Mellon IJniversity, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania MARTIN KARPLUS Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts B. MONTGOMERY PETTITT Department of Chemistry University of Houston Houston, Texas ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME L.XXI Series editors Ilya Prigogine Stuart A. Rice University of Brussels Department of Chemistry Brussels. BelRium and and The James Franck Institute University of Texas University of Chicugo Austin. Texas Chicago. Illinois AN INTERSCIENCE” PUBLICATION JOHN WILEY & SONS NEW YORK CHICHESTER BRISBANE TORONTO SINGAPORE PROTEINS: A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DYNAMICS, STRUCTURE, AND THERMODYNAMICS ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME LXXI EDITORIAL BOARD C. J. BALLHAUSEN,Kobenhaven Universitets Fysisk-Kemiske Institut, Kemisk La- boratorium IV, Kobenhaven, Denmark BRUCE BERNE, Columbia University, Department of Chemistry, New York, New York, U.S.A. RICHARDB. BERNSTEIN,University of California, Department of Chemistry, LOS Angeles, California, U.S.A. G. CARERI,Instituto di Fisica “Guglielmo Marconi,” Universita delli Studi, Piazzle delle Scienze, Rome, Italy MORRELCOHEN, Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Clinton Township, An- nandale, New Jersey, U.S.A. KARLF. FREED,The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. ROBERTGOMER, The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. RAYMONDE. KAPRAL, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada WILLIAMKLEMPERER, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U .S. A. Yu L. KLIMONTOVITCH,Moscow State University, Moscow, USSR V. KRINSKI,Institute of Biological Physics, USSR Academy of Science, Puschino, Moscow Region, USSR M. MANDEL,Chemie-Complex der Rijks-Universiteit, Wassenaarseweg, Leiden, Netherlands RUDYMARCUS, Department of Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, Pasa- dena, California, U.S.A.
  • Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan

    Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan

    Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan A cooperative resource management plan developed by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Royal Botanical Gardens April 7, 2010 Correct citation for this publication: Bowlby, J.N. , K. McCormack, and M.G. Heaton. 2010. Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Royal Botanical Gardens. Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan Executive Summary Introduction The Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan (HHWFMP) provides information about the characteristics of the watershed, the state of fisheries resources, and guidance for the management of fisheries resources in the watershed. The need for the HHWFMP developed directly from successes of the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to restore water quality and fish habitat in Hamilton Harbour and its watershed. Hamilton Harbour is a large embayment at the western tip of Lake Ontario. The main tributaries of Hamilton Harbour include Spencer Creek, Grindstone Creek, and Red Hill Creek. The Hamilton Harbour watershed, which includes the contributing streams and creeks, covers an area of approximately 500 km2. It encompasses some of the regions most scenic and diverse landscapes: the Niagara Escarpment is a prominent physical feature, and Cootes Paradise is one of the largest and most significant coastal wetlands of Lake Ontario. Water quality in Hamilton Harbour and Cootes Paradise is the most important factor that currently limits the successful restoration of sustainable, self–reproducing native fish community. In 1987, Hamilton Harbour was officially designated as an Area of Concern (AOC) by the International Joint Commission, pursuant to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
  • Hamilton Port Authority

    Hamilton Port Authority

    THERE’S LOTS HAPPENING IN THE NORTH END! Tell us about your upcoming events, advertise your business or give us your feedback in our Letters to The Editor column. We’re looking for more people to help us put your Newspaper together. What do you like to do? Report on events or interview people? Maybe help with proof reading? Email [email protected] JANUARY 2019 | VOLUME 1 | [email protected] | WWW.NORTHENDBREEZES.COM | @NORTHENDBREEZES | FACEBOOK.COM/NORTHENDBREEZES would not be out of place in any HAMILTON PORT luxury liner. The exterior of the building is faced with limestone AUTHORITY: panelling and large steel mounted windows that gather light and re- flect the sky in a way that suggests THE BUILDING THAT a watery environment. THINKS IT’S A SHIP In 2012, to mark the 100th an- niversary of the founding of the Harbour trust, the Port Authority, SUBMITTED BY ROBYN GILLAM which replaced the Trust in 2000, There’s no proof that the Hamilton Harbour Com- renewed the building. While pre- missioners wanted a land-based ship for their new serving unique materials used in headquarters when they purchased the site at 601 the original construction, like the Burlington in 1951, but there are plenty of clues. steel doors, some features were upgraded. The outdoor railings While Hamilton architects, Murton and Evans, were replaced with titanium and a did not provide any concept or “vision” for their new commemorative plaque was five-storey office building, they offered a design added to those on the facade of the in the Art Moderne style, rather oldfashioned by building.
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018

    April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018

    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
  • Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project

    Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project

    Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Comprehensive Study Report Prepared for: Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Transport Canada Hamilton Port Authority Prepared by: The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group AECOM October 30, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group Members: Roger Santiago, Environment Canada Erin Hartman, Environment Canada Rupert Joyner, Environment Canada Sue-Jin An, Environment Canada Matt Graham, Environment Canada Cheriene Vieira, Ontario Ministry of Environment Ron Hewitt, Public Works and Government Services Canada Bill Fitzgerald, Hamilton Port Authority The Technical Task Group gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following parties in the preparation and completion of this document: Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Transport Canada, Hamilton Port Authority, Health Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ontario Ministry of Environment, Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Agency, D.C. Damman and Associates, City of Hamilton, U.S. Steel Canada, National Water Research Institute, AECOM, ARCADIS, Acres & Associated Environmental Limited, Headwater Environmental Services Corporation, Project Advisory Group, Project Implementation Team, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Office, Hamilton Conservation Authority, Royal Botanical Gardens and Halton Region Conservation Authority. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................
  • STIX 394372 1 En Bookfront

    STIX 394372 1 En Bookfront

    Quantum Systems in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics VOLUME 30 Honorary Editors Rudolph A. Marcus (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA) Roy McWeeny (Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy) Editors-in-Chief J. Maruani (formerly Laboratoire de Chimie Physique, Paris, France) S. Wilson (formerly Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK) Editorial Board E. Brändas (University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden) L. Cederbaum (Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany) G. Delgado-Barrio (Instituto de Matemáticas y Física Fundamental, Madrid, Spain) E.K.U. Gross (Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany) K. Hirao (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) Chao-Ping Hsu (Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan) R. Lefebvre (Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris, France) R. Levine (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel) K. Lindenberg (University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA) A. Lund (University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden) M.A.C. Nascimento (Instituto de Química, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) P. Piecuch (Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA) M. Quack (ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland) S.D. Schwartz (Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA) O. Vasyutinskii (Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia) Y.A. Wang (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) Former Editors and Editorial Board Members I. Prigogine (†) W.F. van Gunsteren (*) J. Rychlewski (†) H. Hubač (*) Y.G. Smeyers (†) E. Kryachko (*) R. Daudel (†) M.P. Levy (*) M. Mateev (†) G.L. Malli (*) W.N. Lipscomb (†) P.G. Mezey (*) Y. Chauvin (†) N. Rahman (*) H.W. Kroto (†) S. Suhai (*) H. Ågren (*) O. Tapia (*) V. Aquilanti (*) P.R. Taylor (*) D. Avnir (*) R.G. Woolley (*) J. Cioslowski (*) †: deceased; *: end of term More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6464 Alia Tadjer ⋅ Rossen Pavlov (†) Jean Maruani ⋅ Erkki J.
  • Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16

    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16

    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 137 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 137 Exhibit A Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 137 Exhibit A1 Served via Overnight Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Country Aastha Broadcasting Network Limited Attn: Legal Unit213 MezzanineFl Morya LandMark1 Off Link Road, Andheri (West) Mumbai 400053 IN Abs Global LTD Attn: Legal O'Hara House 3 Bermudiana Road Hamilton HM08 BM Abs-Cbn Global Limited Attn: Legal Mother Ignacia Quezon City Manila PH Aditya Jain S/O Sudhir Kumar Jain Attn: Legal 12, Printing Press Area behind Punjab Kesari Wazirpur Delhi 110035 IN AdminNacinl TelecomunicacionUruguay Complejo Torre De Telecomuniciones Guatemala 1075. Nivel 22 HojaDeEntrada 1000007292 5000009660 Montevideo CP 11800 UY Advert Bereau Company Limited Attn: Legal East Legon Ars Obojo Road Asafoatse Accra GH Africa Digital Network Limited c/o Nation Media Group Nation Centre 7th Floor Kimathi St PO Box 28753-00100 Nairobi KE Africa Media Group Limited Attn: Legal Jamhuri/Zaramo Streets Dar Es Salaam TZ Africa Mobile Network Communication Attn: Legal 2 Jide Close, Idimu Council Alimosho Lagos NG Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal 131Rue1221 Entree Des Hydrocarbures Derriere Star Land Hotel Bonapriso-Douala Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal BP12153 Bonapriso Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Gb,
  • HL 0002 18 Articling Brochure Outside

    HL 0002 18 Articling Brochure Outside

    The Hamilton Bar is recognized not only for its excellence but its true sense of camaraderie. Our Bar has long encouraged articling students and lawyers to participate in the numerous seminars, professional and social activities sponsored by the Hamilton Law Association, the Hamilton Lawyers’ Club, the Hamilton Criminal Lawyers’ Association and the Hamilton Medical/Legal Society. These organizations help make Hamilton a unique place to practise law. The Hamilton Law Association is proud and honoured to house the Anthony Pepe Memorial Law Library, located in our offices in the John Sopinka Court House. Full time staff provide support to help you learn your way around the library. As a reference facility the library offers a comprehensive collection of case reports, digests, statutes, texts, CPD publications and law journals. Resources in electronic format are Explore & increasingly replacing or supplementing the print resources. Computers with internet connection and access to a host of the most popular legal reference Consider software are available to all members. Hamilton With a population of over 500,000, Hamilton is a vibrant Hamilton is comprised of diverse cultures spread community conveniently located less than an hour from throughout pleasant neighbourhoods and vibrant Articling is a crucial part of a lawyer’s training and metropolitan Toronto and the Niagara wine region. communities from Stoney Creek in the east to choosing a law firm is a very important decision for a Hamilton is the 5th largest city in Ontario and offers a Ancaster, Dundas and Waterdown in the west. new graduate. Choosing where to article and practise unique blend of urban and rural amenities.
  • Nobel Lectures™ 2001-2005

    Nobel Lectures™ 2001-2005

    World Scientific Connecting Great Minds 逾10 0 种 诺贝尔奖得主著作 及 诺贝尔奖相关图书 我们非常荣幸得以出版超过100种诺贝尔奖得主著作 以及诺贝尔奖相关图书。 我们自1980年代开始与诺贝尔奖得主合作出版高品质 畅销书。一些得主担任我们的编辑顾问、丛书编辑， 并于我们期刊发表综述文章与学术论文。 世界科技与帝国理工学院出版社还邀得其中多位作了公 开演讲。 Philip W Anderson Sir Derek H R Barton Aage Niels Bohr Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Murray Gell-Mann Georges Charpak Nicolaas Bloembergen Baruch S Blumberg Hans A Bethe Aaron J Ciechanover Claude Steven Chu Cohen-Tannoudji Leon N Cooper Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Niels K Jerne Richard Feynman Kenichi Fukui Lawrence R Klein Herbert Kroemer Vitaly L Ginzburg David Gross H Gobind Khorana Rita Levi-Montalcini Harry M Markowitz Karl Alex Müller Sir Nevill F Mott Ben Roy Mottelson 诺贝尔奖相关图书 THE PERIODIC TABLE AND A MISSED NOBEL PRIZES THAT CHANGED MEDICINE NOBEL PRIZE edited by Gilbert Thompson (Imperial College London) by Ulf Lagerkvist & edited by Erling Norrby (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) This book brings together in one volume fifteen Nobel Prize- winning discoveries that have had the greatest impact upon medical science and the practice of medicine during the 20th “This is a fascinating account of how century and up to the present time. Its overall aim is to groundbreaking scientists think and enlighten, entertain and stimulate. work. This is the insider’s view of the process and demands made on the Contents: The Discovery of Insulin (Robert Tattersall) • The experts of the Nobel Foundation who Discovery of the Cure for Pernicious Anaemia, Vitamin B12 assess the originality and significance (A Victor Hoffbrand) • The Discovery of
  • Cootes Paradise Sanctuary Died Arriving by Ship in the 1840S and Those Who Died in the Cholera Epidemic in the 1860S

    Cootes Paradise Sanctuary Died Arriving by Ship in the 1840S and Those Who Died in the Cholera Epidemic in the 1860S

    s il a r t t n o rfr ate W d n a uce Br e h t to s Link ara Escarpment World Biosphere Reserve Biosphere World Escarpment ara g Part of the Nia the of Part Trail Destinations 1. Burial Grounds Located on Burlington Heights along York Blvd., the area provides the best views in the region. A memorial marks this site’s historic connections — the War of 1812, immigrants who Cootes Paradise Sanctuary died arriving by ship in the 1840s and those who died in the cholera epidemic in the 1860s. Established in 1927 for its signifi cance as an migratory bird stopover, it’s RBG’s largest and most diverse sanctuary at over 2. Westdale Ravine 600 hectares. The area features a 320-hectare river-mouth marsh, Located on the south shore of Cootes Paradise, this deeply glacial plateaus, 16 creeks and 25 kilometres of shoreline. incised sand-plain ravine features a spring-fed creek, exposed Royal Botanical Gardens glacial beach rocks and some of the tallest trees on the MAJOR ACCESS POINTS property. It is a forest-birding hotspot. Mission To be a living museum which serves local, regional and Princess Point 3. Native Trees Walk global communities while developing and promoting public Princess Point is a natural gathering place and trail hub. It Starting at the Nature Centre, these trails travel through a understanding of the relationship between the plant world, includes a canoe launch to the marsh, access to six kilometres of labeled native tree collection — a perfect way to learn how to humanity and the rest of nature.
  • Nuclear Energy 2 Editorial out Ofhealthcare Taking Thepollution Unpopular Sector the Benefitsofan Nuclear Energy Tion Whichhasbeenignoredfortoolong

    Nuclear Energy 2 Editorial out Ofhealthcare Taking Thepollution Unpopular Sector the Benefitsofan Nuclear Energy Tion Whichhasbeenignoredfortoolong

    954050_RDT40_EN 19-02-2004 07:51 Pagina 1 a ISSN 1024-0802 Nuclear 15 KI-AB-03-040-EN-C Energy Can we do without it? Environment Taking the pollution out of health care p. 15 Science and ethics Protecting the ‘whistle-blowers’ p. 35 954050_RDT40_EN 19-02-2004 07:51 Pagina 2 2 RTD info N° 40 February 2004 Editorial Science under pressure Sacked or suspended… while others are being individuals acting as the ‘conscience’ of sci- one and the same time. This causes confusion, prevented from publishing – it is not unusual for ence do not always have the legal or legislative conflicts and sometimes irregularities. It blurs scientists who publicly express doubts or fears tools to ensure their voices are heard and their their image and that of science along with it. about the consequences of their research to find rights are respected. In this respect, science is Aware of the problem, the publishers of certain their civic conscience causing them profes- a very human and mundane activity, with its fair journals now require their contributors to cite sional problems. At a time when science is per- share of conflicts, slip-ups and moral issues. the source of their funding as proof that an art- haps too often seen as the universal magic icle deemed to be scientifically correct is not, at Researchers must therefore be able to speak out wand, there is the temptation to have scientists the same time, potentially biased. freely on the ethical aspects of their research, say what the politicians or captains of industry subject of course to the exclusion of ‘denounce- Until researchers speak openly and transparently would like to hear.