DOCSLIB.ORG

MATHEMATICAL MODELING of WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTIONS in MARINE CURRENT TURBINES By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MATHEMATICAL MODELING of WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTIONS in MARINE CURRENT TURBINES By MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTIONS IN MARINE CURRENT TURBINES by Amit J. Singh A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The College of Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May 2012 MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTIONS IN MARINE CURRENT TURBINES by Amit J. Singh This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor, Dr. Madasamy Arockiasamy, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, and has been approved by the members ofhis supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of the College of Engineering and Computer Science and was accepted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree ofMaster ofScience. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: M. Arockiasamy, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor ~u;;; Panagiotis D. Scarlatos, Ph.D. C·, epartment ICiv·l, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering ohammad I, PIi.D. Interim Dean, ollege ofEngineering and Computer Science ~]1>~~ Barry T. Rosson, Ph.D. Dean, Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work presented herein has been supported financially by the Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center (SNMREC) and the author gratefully acknowledges the support. The author would like to thank Susan Skemp, Executive Director, and Dr. H.P. Hanson, Scientific Director for the constant encouragement. The author wishes to express his sincere thanks to his thesis advisor Dr. M. Arockiasamy, Professor and Director, Center for Infrastructure and Constructed Facilities, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geomatics Engineering, for his excellent guidance, suggestions, and constant review in all stages throughout the course of this work. Grateful acknowledgements are due to Dr. Yan Yong and Dr. Chaouki Ghenai for their interest, encouragement, and manuscript review. The author expresses sincere appreciation to Ben Oliver, Lin, and Rammone Bartlett from the Department of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering for their graceful assistance in using the ANSYS software. Finally, I am most grateful for the support, affection, and encouragement from my parents, family and friends throughout the course of the research. iii ABSTRACT Author: Amit J. Singh Title: Mathematical Modeling of Wave-Current Interactions in Marine Current Turbines. Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. M. Arockiasamy Degree: Master of Science Year: 2012 The concept of marine current turbines was developed by Peter Fraenkel in the early 1970s. Ever since Fraenkel’s efforts to modify and test the technology, several worldwide agencies have been exploiting the technology to retrofit the marine current turbine to their particular application. The marine current turbine has evolved from generating a few kilowatts to a few gigawatts. The present study focuses on a megawatt sized turbine to be located offshore the coast of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. The turbine is to be placed in a similar location as a 20 kW test turbine developed by the Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center (SNMREC) at Florida Atlantic University, Dania Beach FL. Data obtained from the SNMREC is used in the mathematical model. ANSYS FLUENT is chosen as the CFD software to perform wave-current interaction simulation for the present study. The turbine is modeled in SolidWorks, then meshed in ANSYS ICEM CFD, then run in FLUENT. The results obtained are compared to iv published work by scholarly articles from Fraenkel, Barltrop and many other well known marine energy researchers. The effects of wave height on the turbine operation are analyzed and the results are presented in the form of plots for tip speed ratio and current velocity. v MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTIONS IN MARINE CURRENT TURBINES CHAPTER 1 ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of the Thesis .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 3 1.4 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ................................................. 4 1.5 Structure of the Report ......................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2 ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Short Term and Long Term Effects on Wind Turbines ........................................... 7 2.2 Marine Current Energy Resource ........................................................................ 8 2.3 Power Extraction ................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Admiralty Inlet ocean current data analysis ........................................................... 13 2.3.2 Metaocean Data for Southeast Florida ................................................................... 16 2.4 Marine Current Extraction Technologies ........................................................... 21 2.5 Power from Marine Current Turbines ................................................................ 27 2.6 Rotor Blade Types ............................................................................................. 35 2.6.1 Axial Flow Rotor Blade Design ............................................................................. 36 2.7 Hydrodynamics .................................................................................................. 37 2.7.1 Wind Turbine Operation Modeling Using CFD .................................................... 37 2.7.2 Marine Turbine Operation Modeling Using CFD .................................................. 41 2.7.3 Wave Current Interactions ..................................................................................... 41 CHAPTER 3 ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 44 3.2 Flow Characteristics ........................................................................................... 45 3.3 Computational Fluid Dynamics ......................................................................... 47 vi 3.4 Basics of Fluid Flow in ANSYS FLUENT ........................................................ 48 3.5 Multiphase Flow ................................................................................................ 49 3.5.1 The VOF Model ..................................................................................................... 54 3.5.2 The Mixture Model ................................................................................................ 74 3.5.3 The Eulerian Model ............................................................................................... 74 3.6 The Finite Element Method ............................................................................... 75 3.7 Blade Element Momentum Theory .................................................................... 76 3.8 Principles of Similitude ...................................................................................... 77 CHAPTER 4 ..................................................................................................................... 78 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 78 4.2 Physical Properties of Fluids.............................................................................. 79 4.3 Fluid Flow in Marine Current Turbines ............................................................. 84 4.3.1 Compressible or Incompressible flow .................................................................... 85 4.3.2 Laminar and Turbulent Flow ................................................................................. 86 4.4 Modeling the Rotor Blade and Hub using SolidWorks ..................................... 87 4.5 Creation of Domain and all its Entities using ANSYS ICEM CFD................... 91 4.5.1 Blade Geometry Manipulation ............................................................................... 91 4.5.2 Computational Fluid Domain ................................................................................. 92 4.5.3 Multiphase Domain ................................................................................................ 93 4.6 Meshing the Domain and Blade ......................................................................... 99 4.6.1 Mesh Type Selection .............................................................................................. 99 4.6.2 Multiphase Mesh Setup ........................................................................................ 100 4.7 CFD Simulation using ANSYS FLUENT ....................................................... 106 4.7.1 Multiphase Flow CFD .......................................................................................... 106 CHAPTER 5 ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Part II-1 Water Wave Mechanics
    Chapter 1 EM 1110-2-1100 WATER WAVE MECHANICS (Part II) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents Page II-1-1. Introduction ............................................................II-1-1 II-1-2. Regular Waves .........................................................II-1-3 a. Introduction ...........................................................II-1-3 b. Definition of wave parameters .............................................II-1-4 c. Linear wave theory ......................................................II-1-5 (1) Introduction .......................................................II-1-5 (2) Wave celerity, length, and period.......................................II-1-6 (3) The sinusoidal wave profile...........................................II-1-9 (4) Some useful functions ...............................................II-1-9 (5) Local fluid velocities and accelerations .................................II-1-12 (6) Water particle displacements .........................................II-1-13 (7) Subsurface pressure ................................................II-1-21 (8) Group velocity ....................................................II-1-22 (9) Wave energy and power.............................................II-1-26 (10)Summary of linear wave theory.......................................II-1-29 d. Nonlinear wave theories .................................................II-1-30 (1) Introduction ......................................................II-1-30 (2) Stokes finite-amplitude wave theory ...................................II-1-32
    [Show full text]
  • SWAN Technical Manual
    SWAN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SWAN Cycle III version 40.51 SWAN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION by : The SWAN team mail address : Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Environmental Fluid Mechanics Section P.O. Box 5048 2600 GA Delft The Netherlands e-mail : [email protected] home page : http://www.fluidmechanics.tudelft.nl/swan/index.htmhttp://www.fluidmechanics.tudelft.nl/sw Copyright (c) 2006 Delft University of Technology. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sec- tions, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is available at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Historicalbackground. 1 1.2 Purposeandmotivation . 2 1.3 Readership............................. 3 1.4 Scopeofthisdocument. 3 1.5 Overview.............................. 4 1.6 Acknowledgements ........................ 5 2 Governing equations 7 2.1 Spectral description of wind waves . 7 2.2 Propagation of wave energy . 10 2.2.1 Wave kinematics . 10 2.2.2 Spectral action balance equation . 11 2.3 Sourcesandsinks ......................... 12 2.3.1 Generalconcepts . 12 2.3.2 Input by wind (Sin).................... 19 2.3.3 Dissipation of wave energy (Sds)............. 21 2.3.4 Nonlinear wave-wave interactions (Snl) ......... 27 2.4 The influence of ambient current on waves . 33 2.5 Modellingofobstacles . 34 2.6 Wave-inducedset-up . 35 2.7 Modellingofdiffraction. 35 3 Numerical approaches 39 3.1 Introduction...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Separation and Vortex Dynamics in Waves Propagating Over A
    China Ocean Eng., 2018, Vol. 32, No. 5, P. 514–523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-018-0054-5, ISSN 0890-5487 http://www.chinaoceanengin.cn/ E-mail: [email protected] Flow Separation and Vortex Dynamics in Waves Propagating over A Submerged Quartercircular Breakwater JIANG Xue-liana, b, YANG Tiana, ZOU Qing-pingc, *, GU Han-bind aTianjin Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics & Engineering Environment, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China bState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China cThe Lyell Centre for Earth and Marine Science and Technology, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK dSchool of Naval Architecture &Mechanical-Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China Received October 22, 2017; revised June 7, 2018; accepted July 5, 2018 ©2018 Chinese Ocean Engineering Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature Abstract The interactions of cnoidal waves with a submerged quartercircular breakwater are investigated by a Reynolds- Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) flow solver with a Volume of Fluid (VOF) surface capturing scheme (RANS- VOF) model. The vertical variation of the instantaneous velocity indicates that flow separation occurs at the boundary layer near the breakwater. The temporal evolution of the velocity and vorticity fields demonstrates vortex generation and shedding around the submerged quartercircular breakwater due to the flow separation. An empirical relationship between the vortex intensity and a few hydrodynamic parameters is proposed based on parametric analysis. In addition, the instantaneous and time-averaged vorticity fields reveal a pair of vortices of opposite signs at the breakwater which are expected to have significant effect on sediment entrainment, suspension, and transportation, therefore, scour on the leeside of the breakwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modelling of Non-Linear Shallow Water Waves
    university of twente faculty of engineering technology (CTW) department of engineering fluid dynamics Numerical modelling of non-linear shallow water waves Supervisor Author Prof. Dr. Ir. H.W.M. L.H. Lei BSc Hoeijmakers August 22, 2017 Preface An important part of the Master Mechanical Engineering at the University of Twente is an internship. This is a nice opportunity to obtain work experience and use the gained knowledge learned during all courses. For me this was an unique chance to go abroad as well. During my search for a challenging internship, I spoke to prof. Hoeijmakers to discuss the possibilities to go abroad. I was especially attracted by Scandinavia. Prof. Hoeijmakers introduced me to Mr. Johansen at SINTEF. I would like to thank both prof. Hoeijmakers and Mr. Johansen for making this internship possible. SINTEF, headquartered in Trondheim, is the largest independent research organisation in Scandinavia. It consists of several institutes. My internship was in the SINTEF Materials and Chemistry group, where I worked in the Flow Technology department. This department has a strong competence on multiphase flow modelling of industrial processes. It focusses on flow assurance market, multiphase reactors and generic flow modelling. During my internship I worked on the SprayIce project. In this project SINTEF develops a model for generation of droplets sprays due to wave impact on marine structures. The application is marine icing. I focussed on understanding of wave propagation. I would to thank all people of the Flow Technology department. They gave me a warm welcome and involved me in all social activities, like monthly seminars during lunch and the annual whale grilling.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution of Wave Height in Shallow Water (Accepted by Coastal Engineering in January 2016)
    On the distribution of wave height in shallow water (Accepted by Coastal Engineering in January 2016) Yanyun Wu, David Randell Shell Research Ltd., Manchester, M22 0RR, UK. Marios Christou Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. Kevin Ewans Sarawak Shell Bhd., 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Philip Jonathan Shell Research Ltd., Manchester, M22 0RR, UK. Abstract The statistical distribution of the height of sea waves in deep water has been modelled using the Rayleigh (Longuet- Higgins 1952) and Weibull distributions (Forristall 1978). Depth-induced wave breaking leading to restriction on the ratio of wave height to water depth require new parameterisations of these or other distributional forms for shallow water. Glukhovskiy (1966) proposed a Weibull parameterisation accommodating depth-limited breaking, modified by van Vledder (1991). Battjes and Groenendijk (2000) suggested a two-part Weibull-Weibull distribution. Here we propose a two-part Weibull-generalised Pareto model for wave height in shallow water, parameterised empirically in terms of sea state parameters (significant wave height, HS, local wave-number, kL, and water depth, d), using data from both laboratory and field measurements from 4 offshore locations. We are particularly concerned that the model can be applied usefully in a straightforward manner; given three pre-specified universal parameters, the model further requires values for sea state significant wave height and wave number, and water depth so that it can be applied. The model has continuous probability density, smooth cumulative distribution function, incorporates the Miche upper limit for wave heights (Miche 1944) and adopts HS as the transition wave height from Weibull body to generalised Pareto tail forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No. 093 409 DEPTH-INDUCED WAVE
    Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No. 093 DEPTH-INDUCED WAVE BREAKING CRITERIA IN DEPENDENCE ON WAVE NONLINEARITY IN COASTAL ZONE 1 Sergey Kuznetsov1, Yana Saprykina Abstract On the base of data of laboratory and field experiments, the regularities in changes in the relative limit height of breaking waves (the breaking index) from peculiarities of nonlinear wave transformations and type of wave breaking were investigated. It is shown that the value of the breaking index depends on the relative part of the wave energy in the frequency range of the second nonlinear harmonic. For spilling breaking waves this part is more than 35% and the breaking index can be taken as a constant equal to 0.6. For plunging breaking waves this part of the energy is less than 35% and the breaking index increases with increasing energy in the frequency range of the second harmonic. It is revealed that the breaking index depends on the phase shift between the first and second nonlinear harmonic (biphase). The empirical dependences of the breaking index on the parameters of nonlinear transformation of waves are proposed. Key words: wave breaking, spilling, plunging, limit height of breaking wave, breaking index, nonlinear wave transformation 1. Introduction Wave breaking is the most visible process of wave transformation when the waves approaching to a coast. The main reason is decreasing of water depth and increasing of wave energy in decreasing water volume. During breaking a wave energy is realized in a surf zone influencing on a sediments transport and on the changes of coastal line and bottom relief. The depth-induced wave breaking criteria which are used in modern numerical and engineering models are usually based on classical dependence between height of breaking wave (H) and depth of water (h) in breaking point: H= γh, (1) where γ – breaking index is adjustable constant and γ=0.8 is suitable for most wave breaking cases (Battjes, Janssen, 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Blade Pitch Angle on the Performance of a Model
    Energy 102 (2016) 166e175 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/energy The influence of blade pitch angle on the performance of a model horizontal axis tidal stream turbine operating under waveecurrent interaction * Tiago A. de Jesus Henriques a, Terry S. Hedges a, Ieuan Owen b, Robert J. Poole a, a School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, L69 3GH, United Kingdom b School of Engineering, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, LN6 7TS, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: Tidal stream turbines offer a promising means of producing renewable energy at foreseeable times and of Received 11 June 2015 predictable quantity. However, the turbines may have to operate under wave-current conditions that Received in revised form cause high velocity fluctuations in the flow, leading to unsteady power output and structural loading and, 18 January 2016 potentially, to premature structural failure. Consequently, it is important to understand the effects that Accepted 10 February 2016 wave-induced velocities may have on tidal devices and how their design could be optimised to reduce Available online xxx the additional unsteady loading. This paper describes an experimental investigation into the performance of a scale-model three- Keywords: Tidal energy bladed HATT (horizontal axis tidal stream turbine) operating under different wave-current combinations HATT (Horizontal axis tidal turbine) and it shows how changes in the blade pitch angle can reduce wave loading. Tests were carried out in the ADV (Acoustic Doppler velocimeter) recirculating water channel at the University of Liverpool, with a paddle wavemaker installed upstream Wave-current interaction of the working section to induce surface waves travelling in the same direction as the current.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted to the University of Nottingham for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, October, 1982
    UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING OSCILLATORY BOUNDARY LAYER OVER FIXED ROUGH BEDS by S. M. BORGHEI, B. Sc. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, October, 1982. I i. ABSTRACT The accurate study of characteristics of the flow under gravity waves has become of prime importance due to the growing demand for structural engineering designs in the coastal environment. Although many investigations have been carried out, the progress of fundamental research was slow due to the lack of an adequate velocity measuring instrument. However in recent years, the development of the Laser Doppler Velocimeter has made it possible to obs- erve the orbital velocity very close to a bed without dis- turbing the flow. This technique was used in this invest- igation, in which observations of the oscillatory flow under gravity waves were carried out above smooth, two- dimensional and three-dimensional rough beds. For the smooth bed case it was found that the velocity profile throughout the depth was well presented by the Stokes second order shear wave equation, except that the theoretical predictions underestimated the observed results, and a linear relationship was obtained for the velocity co- efficients between the two sets of values. As for mean velocity the profile was in close agreement with the Longuet- Higgins conduction solution, and it was found to have a negative value (in opposite direction to wave progression) in the bulk of fluid and always positive values within the boundary layer. ii. The rough beds made little change to the flow in the bulk of fluid.
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Shore Sediment Transport Under Cnoidal Waves Using Particle Image Velocimetry
    Near-Shore Sediment Transport Under Cnoidal Waves Using Particle Image Velocimetry by Jenna Katrina A thesis submitted to the College of Engineering and Science of Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ocean Engineering Melbourne, Florida July, 2021 We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis, “Near-Shore Sediment Transport Under Cnoidal Waves Using Particle Image Velocimetry.” by Jenna Rose Katrina _________________________________________________ Robert J. Weaver, Ph.D. Associate Professor Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences Major Advisor _________________________________________________ Stephen Wood, Ph.D. Professor Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences Committee Member _________________________________________________ Michael Splitt, M.S. Assistant Professor College of Aeronautics Committee Member _________________________________________________ Richard Aronson Ph.D. Professor and Department Head Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences Abstract Title: Near-Shore Sediment Transport Under Cnoidal Waves Using Particle Image Velocimetry Author: Jenna Katrina Advisor: Robert J. Weaver, Ph.D. With future trends showing a higher percentage of the human population living along the coast, coastal resilience is a significant topic of concern for many researchers. The purpose of this research was to analyze near-shore sediment transport under different wave parameters using the technique of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and laboratory studies
    [Show full text]
  • An Extension to the Linear Shallow Water Equation
    An extension to the linear shallow water equation R. Porter School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK. [email protected] 1 Introduction The linearised Shallow Water Equation (SWE) approximates the propagation of surface gravity waves over variable bathymetry z = −h(x,y) in the long wavelength limit, λ ≫ h, and is commonly expressed (e.g. Stoker (1957)) in the form g∇ · (h∇ζ)= ζtt (1) where g is acceleration due to gravity, ∇ = (∂x, ∂y) and ζ(x,y,t) is the free surface elevation assumed to be small in the sense that |∇ζ|∼ ζ/λ ≪ (h/λ)3. This latter assumption justifies the linearisation of the governing equations in what follows. When time-harmonic motion is considered and ζ(x,y,t)= ℜ{η(x,y)e−iωt}, (1) is transformed to ∇ · (h∇η)+ Kη = 0 (2) where K = ω2/g. The local wavenumber k(x,y) = 2π/λ, determined by the local depth h(x,y) as though the bed were flat, satisfies k2h = K and this corresponds to the long wavelength (kh → 0) limit of the unapproximated water wave dispersion relation k tanh kh = K. Under the SWE waves are non-dispersive. The SWE is practically limited to modelling of very long waves, for example tidal simulations or tsunami wave propagation. In spite of this the SWE has received renewed recent attention on account of its structural similarity to 2nd order partial differential equations describing waves in two-dimensional acoustics and TM- or TE-polarised electromagnetics and this analogue has seen it used as a model for producing exotic effects in water waves such as invisibility cloaking, negative refraction, wave-shifting and other wave control mechanisms (see, for e.g., the review in Porter (2018).) Often studies of these topics are accompanied by experiments which are of questionable quality – understandable not least because the conditions of shallow water theory are not easily met.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrence in Truncated Boussinesq Models for Nonlinear Waves in Shallow Water
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 95, NO. C7, PAGES 11,547-11,556, JULY 15, 1990 Recurrence in Truncated Boussinesq Models for Nonlinear Waves in Shallow Water STEVE ELGAR Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman M. H. FREILICH Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California R. T. GUZA Center for Coastal Studies, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California The rapid spatial recurrence of weakly nonlinear, weakly dispersive, progressive shallow-water waves is examined with numerical simulations using a discretized and truncated (i.e., finite number of allowed frequency modes) form of the Boussinesq equations. Laboratory observations of sandbar formation under recurring, mechanically generated monochromatic waves with small Ursell number have motivated others to suggestthat recurrence in naturally occurring random waves contributes to the establishmentof periodic longshore sandbarson beaches. The present study primarily examines recurrence in wave fields with Ursell number O(1) and characterizes the sensitivity of recurrence to initial spectral shapeand number of allowed frequency modes. It is shown that rapid spatial recurrence is not an inherent property of discretized and truncated Boussinesqsystems for evolution distances of 10-50 wavelengths. When a small number of Fourier modes are used to represent an initially monochromatic wave field with significant nonlinearity (the Ursell number is O(1)), there is a trend toward recurrence of initial modal amplitudes, consistent with the known periodic solutions for a primary wave and its harmonic. However, for 32 modes or more, numerical simulations indicate only a few cycles of a damped recurrence, followed by disordered evolution of the Fourier amplitudes. For initial conditions similar to ocean field measurements of frequency-sorted swell with Ursell number O(1) and many (>300) modes in the numerical model, the Fourier coefficientsof the wave field do not recur rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hybrid Spectral/DG Method for Solving the Phase-Averaged Ocean Wave Equation: Algorithm and Validation ⇑ B
    Journal of Computational Physics 231 (2012) 4921–4953 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Computational Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcp A hybrid spectral/DG method for solving the phase-averaged ocean wave equation: Algorithm and validation ⇑ B. Yildirim a, George Em Karniadakis b, a School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA b Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA article info abstract Article history: We develop a new high-order hybrid discretization of the phased-averaged (action bal- Received 25 July 2011 ance) equation to simulate ocean waves. We employ discontinuous Galerkin (DG) discret- Received in revised form 3 April 2012 ization on an unstructured grid in geophysical space and Fourier-collocation along the Accepted 6 April 2012 directional and frequency coordinates. The original action balance equation is modified Available online 25 April 2012 to facilitate absorbing boundary conditions along the frequency direction; this modifica- tion enforces periodicity at the frequency boundaries so that the fast convergence of Fou- Keywords: rier-collocation holds. In addition, a mapping along the directional coordinate is introduced Action balance equation to cluster the collocation points around steep directional spectra. Time-discretization is Absorbing boundary layer Spectral element accomplished by the TVD Runge–Kutta scheme. The overall convergence of the scheme Unstructured grid is exponential (spectral). We successfully verified and validated the method against several analytical solutions, observational data, and experimental results. Ó 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Wave prediction models fall into two categories: phased-averaged and phase-resolving. The phased-averaged wave mod- els solve for the energy density (or action density) to obtain important parameters, such as the significant wave height, through integration of the energy density.
    [Show full text]