DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment NIAGARA FALLS STATE PARK ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY-SOUTH SEGMENT-“RIVERWAY” FINAL DESIGN REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared on Behalf of: NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ANDREW M CUOMO, Governor ROSE HARVEY Commissioner MARK THOMAS, Western District Director January 29, 2014 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY SOUTH SEGMENT/”RIVERWAY” FINAL DESIGN REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PIN 5410.54 Prepared by: Hatch Mott MacDonald In Association with: Alta Planning + Design Heritage Landscapes Saratoga Associates The Urban Design Project Watts Architecture & Engineering Panamerican Consultants Fisher Associates JANUARY 29, 2014 In partnership with: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration City of Niagara Falls, New York New York State Department of USA Niagara Development Transportation Corporation PR253346, Rev. 6 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PR253346, Rev. 6 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PR253346, Rev. 6 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PR253346, Rev. 6 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need .....................................................................................................................................1-2 1.2.1 Where is the Project Located ......................................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 Why is the Project Needed .........................................................................................................1-3 1.2.3 What are the Objectives/Purposes of the Project ........................................................................1-3 1.3 What Alternatives are Being Considered ..................................................................................................1-5 1.4 How will the Alternatives Affect the Environment ..................................................................................1-5 1.5 What are the Costs and Schedules ............................................................................................................1-8 1.6 Which Alternative is Preferred .................................................................................................................1-9 1.7 Who Will Decide Which Alternative will be Selected and How Can I be Involved in this Decision ..................................................................................................................................................1-11 2 PROJECT CONTEXT: HISTORY, PLANS, CONDITIONS AND NEEDS ..............................................2-1 2.1 History and Historical Design Considerations ..........................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Park History and its Premise as the Basis of Design ..................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Project History............................................................................................................................2-3 2.1.3 Historic Site Needs .....................................................................................................................2-3 2.2 Transportation Plans and Roadway Conditions ........................................................................................2-4 2.2.1 Local Plans for the Project Area .................................................................................................2-4 2.2.2 Transportation Corridor ..............................................................................................................2-4 2.2.3 Operations (Traffic and Safety) and Maintenance ......................................................................2-5 2.2.4 Infrastructure ..............................................................................................................................2-9 2.2.5 Miscellaneous ...........................................................................................................................2-12 2.2.6 Transportation Needs ...............................................................................................................2-12 2.3 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trolley Path Considerations ............................................................................2-12 2.3.1 Pedestrian Considerations ........................................................................................................2-12 2.3.2 Bicycle Considerations .............................................................................................................2-13 2.3.3 Trolley Path Considerations .....................................................................................................2-14 2.3.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Needs ....................................................................................2-15 2.4 Park Conditions, Deficiencies and Engineering Considerations .............................................................2-16 2.4.1 Historic Site Conditions and Character ....................................................................................2-16 2.4.2 General Park Conditions and Character ...................................................................................2-16 2.4.3 Grading and Landscape ............................................................................................................2-20 2.4.4 Access to Recreational Features and Wayfinding ....................................................................2-20 2.4.5 Lighting ....................................................................................................................................2-23 2.4.6 Park Needs ...............................................................................................................................2-26 3 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Design Criteria ..........................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Historic Site Design Criteria ......................................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 Transportation Design Criteria ...................................................................................................3-3 3.1.3 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trolley Path Design Criteria ...............................................................3-9 3.1.4 General Park Design Criteria ...................................................................................................3-10 3.2 Alternatives Considered ..........................................................................................................................3-13 3.2.1 Alternative 1: No Build/Null ...................................................................................................3-14 3.2.2 Alternative 2: Riverway on Existing Alignment .....................................................................3-14 3.2.3 Alternative 3: Riverway on Olmsted-Vaux Inspired Alignment .............................................3-15 3.2.4 Detailed Engineering Description of Alternatives 2 and 3 .......................................................3-16 PR253346, Rev. 6 Page i New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Robert Moses Parkway South Segment “Riverway” Final Design Report/Environmental Assessment 3.2.5 Design Options for Feasible Build Alternatives .......................................................................3-18 3.3 Engineering and Landscape Architecture Considerations ......................................................................3-25 3.3.1 Sustainable Site Considerations ...............................................................................................3-25 3.3.2 Historic Site Considerations .....................................................................................................3-29 3.3.3 Transportation Considerations..................................................................................................3-30 3.3.4 Bicycle/Pedestrian/Trolley Accommodations ..........................................................................3-37 3.3.5 General Park Considerations ....................................................................................................3-39
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Book of Niagara
    \V Ki> SpCl 127 N836 p' THE RED BOOK OF NIAGARA A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE Scientific, Historical and Scenic Aspects of Niagara FOR THE USE OF TRAVELLERS BY IRVING P. BISHOP, S. M., F, G. S. A, With Many Illustrations, Index and Maps BUFFALO, N. Y. THE WENBORNE-SUMNER CO. I 90 I ^S6696 coptright 1901 bt The Wenborne-Su>iner Co. Press of The Wenborne-Sumner Co. Buffalo, n. Y. Preface. For more than two hundred years the Niagara region has been the most celebrated part of America. In the earlier period of our history it was the doorway to the upper lake region and the Mississippi Valley, for the possession of which French and English and English and Colonists struggled in turn. From a scientific point of view it has presented problems which have interested almost every geol- ogist of distinction, both in America and Europe. As a scenic wonder the Cataract has probably attracted more visitors than any other single natural object in the world. It is the purpose of this handbook to enable the visitor, whether his tastes be for the scenic, the scientific or the historical, to see Niagara from his own point of view, with the minimum outlay of time and money. The book is based upon the author's personal acquaintance with this region, which for thirteen years has been his field for study and recreation. It is issued solely in the interest of travellers whose needs have been, as far as possible, anticipated and provided for. Advertisements of all kind are strictly excluded from its pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails in the Niagara River Greenway
    Lower River Upper River The Headwaters LAKE ONTARIO 4 1 2 5 93 3 y. Pk es s PORTER Mo ert b Ro 6 7 Buffalo Ave. 7 8 1 WHEATFIELD 9 18 3 4 5 Ri NIAGARA RIVER ver Rd. LEWISTON 2 8 104 17 CITY OF NORTH 22 VILLAGE OF 190 14 LEWISTON TONAWANDA THE LANDSCAPE 1 12 15 15 16 14 16 TUSCARORA 13 CANADA 18 Parks INDIAN RESERVARION 12 17 E. Robinson KENMORE 17 21 2 GRAND ISLAND 23-26 Aqua Lane Park . 1 13 CANADA Whitehaven Rd. 27/28 34 Black Rock Canal Park. 3 11 . 30-33 20 19 Broderick Park . 3 22 er Rd40 Buffalo River Fest Park . 68 31 23 Riv 4 17 21 38 CITY OF 5 198 16 20 H Cazenovia Park* . 92 10 13 yde 37 TONAWANDA 36 290 Delaware Park* . 13 8 11,12 P 9 190 Lockport Rd. 35 265 Forest 15 27 ar Erie Basin Marina & Gardents . 65 25 k 31 26 30 Front Park* . 25 190 NIAGARA d. Baseline Rd. West Ferry East Ferry R Gallagher Beach . .. 90 28 29 WHEATFIELD r TONAWANDA 20 33 e CITY OF 34 Rd. Ward Sheridan Dr. LaSalle Park . 33 CANADA 21 e. Riv t. BUFFALO 67 Av NIAGARA FALLS 66 S . e Niaga Martin Luther King Jr. Park*. 30 r ra Falls B 22 26 30 35 36 lvd. 68 Rd wa 190 2 23 a Main y Riverside Park* . 62 25 l 31 37 38/39 Ni 27 ar 24 ag De it l South Park* . 93 41 40-54 i 33 63 65 41 KENMORE ara M 33 56 57 58-60 64 Squaw Island Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side
    Meiqianbao/ Shutterstock Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side By Jason Cochran The legendary Niagara Falls, one of the greatest natural attractions in North America, straddles the border between Ontario, Canada, and New York State. In an ideal tourism situation, you'd be able to drive or stroll across the Rainbow International Bridge to enjoy the view from both banks of the Niagara River. But sometimes you just can't get over the border. Maybe you don't have enough time. Maybe your legal status won't allow it. Or maybe you happen to be living through a once-in-a-lifetime global pandemic that has sealed national borders. It's all good! If you're restricted to the U.S. side, you won't find yourself over a barrel. There's plenty to do. In fact, some of the best activities in the Niagara Falls area are on the American side. Pictured above: Terrapin Point, at right, juts into the eastern side of the Falls from Niagara Falls State Park in New York State. Niagara Falls State Park Niagara Falls State Park If we're being honest, the Canadian side has richer options for quality lodging and tourist amenities, although the stuff on that riverbank tends toward cheesy honky-tonk. New York's territory beside the Falls, on the other hand, has been preserved from development since the 1880s. In fact, the area is now the oldest state park in the United States. The more-than-400-acre Niagara Falls State Park, which is separated from the core of town by a breakaway river, is speckled with whitewater-spanning bridges, river islands, curving walkways, and native animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I
    Intensive Level Survey Historic Resources – Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I 3.0 Historical Overview This section provides a narrative history of the City of Niagara Falls with specific emphasis on the Downtown neighborhood. The overview addresses significant trends and themes associated with the city’s historic context. The Downtown neighborhood’s period of significance is identified and examined in this chapter. Martin Wachadlo, architectural historian, conducted the background historic research. 3.1 Niagara County: Physiology and Geology Figure 3-1. Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls, New York Niagara County borders the southern shore of Lake Ontario in the extreme northwestern corner of New York State, and occupies part of the Huron and Ontario Plains. The Ontario Plain comprises part of Lake Ontario to the foot of the Niagara Escarpment1, and the Huron plain extends from the crest of the escarpment southward beyond the county line. The Niagara Escarpment begins in Watertown, New York, USA and extends westerly along the Manitoulin Island in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The escarpment continues through Wisconsin and Illinois. With geological material measuring 64-ft thick, the stratigraphy at Niagara Falls provides a glimpse into the overall rock types comprising the Niagara Escarpment (Figure 3-1). The top layer is Lockport Dolomite, a hard rock referred to as the "Lower Silurian Group." Below the top layer is Rochester Shale, which is much softer and wears away easily with the effects of erosion. Under the shale are harder strata of limestone and dolostone known as the "Clinton Group." Below the harder strata is Grimsby sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 New York - 36 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ALBANY 48 - XXX D COHOES OUTDOOR REC. PROJECTS CITY OF COHOES $95,431.35 C 4/22/1967 12/31/1971 21 80 - XXX A VILLAGE PARK & PLAY AREA VILLAGE OF VOORHEESVILLE $5,000.00 C 1/5/1968 4/1/1968 21 119 - XXX A THOMPSON'S LAKE ACQ. ENCON $22,262.50 C 6/30/1970 12/31/1974 21 144 - XXX D WASHINGTON PARK COURTS CITY OF ALBANY $68,497.12 C 12/6/1971 12/31/1973 21 154 - XXX D FRANK WATERSON PARK CITY OF ALBANY $57,046.70 C 12/1/1971 6/30/1973 21 203 - XXX D ORANGE STREET BASKETBALLCOURT CITY OF ALBANY $5,804.62 C 7/13/1972 12/31/1973 21 276 - XXX D FRANK WATERSON PARK CITY OF ALBANY $187,061.52 C 3/28/1974 12/31/1976 21 277 - XXX D CLINTON PARK: WATERVLIET CITY OF WATERVLIET $15,259.92 C 3/27/1974 12/31/1979 21 320 - XXX D LINCOLN PARK TENNIS COURTS CITY OF ALBANY $84,987.12 C 6/13/1975 12/31/1977 21 351 - XXX D WEST ALBANY POCKET PARK TOWN OF COLONIE $107,868.66 C 1/7/1976 12/31/1979 21 361 - XXX D LISHAKILL POCKET PARK TOWN OF COLONIE $25,000.00 C 4/14/1976 12/31/1978 21 367 - XXX D ALLEGANY POCKET PARK TOWN OF COLONIE $23,931.38 C 3/23/1976 12/31/1978 21 413 - XXX D CENTRAL PARK ICE SKATING FACILITY CITY OF WATERVLIET $280,000.00 C 8/4/1976 12/31/1979 21 454 - XXX D J.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. SEQR Process
    Appendix F SEQRA documents NOTICE SEQR: LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION TOWN OF WHEATFIELD TOWN BOARD May 25, 2012 This notice is filed pursuant to Part 617 6NYCRR, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (SEQRA) and Local Law 1979-2. The Town of Wheatfield has received a complete application from: Name: Town of Wheatfield Address: Town Hall 2800 Church Road Wheatfield, NY 14120 Contact Person: Robert O’Toole, Town Attorney Telephone: (716) 504-0494 Regarding: Town of Wheatfield Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Description and Location of Action: The Town of Wheatfield intends to adopt a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) for designated areas adjacent to the Niagara River and Tonawanda Creek shorelines. The LWRP is a locally prepared, comprehensive land and water use plan that addresses issues relevant to the protection of community character, improved public access and recreation, environmental resource protection, protection and enhancement of water quality, flooding and erosion, and scenic and historic resources. This action also includes adoption of LWRP Consistency Review Law to establish procedures for determining if proposed actions, as defined in the law, to be directly undertaken, funded or permitted within the designated Local Waterfront Revitalization Area are consistent with the policies set forth in the Town of Wheatfield LWRP as well as zoning changes along the Niagara River shoreline to bring local zoning into conformance with proposed land uses identified in the LWRP document. As the local agency
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara National Heritage Area Study
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Niagara National Heritage Area Study Study Report 2005 Contents Executive Summaryr .................................................................................................. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5 Part 1: Study Purpose and Backgroundr Project History ....................................................................................................................11 Legislation ..........................................................................................................................11 Study Process ......................................................................................................................12 Planning Context ................................................................................................................15 The Potential for Heritage Tourism ..................................................................................20 Part 2: Affected Environmentr .............................................................................. Description of the Study Area ..........................................................................................23 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................24 Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission
    Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Part II – Management Plan Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission July 2012 NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA Part II - Management Plan Submitted to: The Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission U.S. National Park Service and Ken Salazar U.S. Secretary of the Interior Consulting team: John Milner Associates, Inc. Heritage Strategies, LLC National Trust for Historic Preservation Bergmann Associates July 2012 NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE A REA MANAGEMENT PLAN Part II – Implementation Plan ii NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE A REA MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents PART II ─ MANAGEMENT PLAN CHAPTER 1 ─ CONCEPT AND APPROACH 1.1 What is a National Heritage Area? ................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Designation of the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area ................................ 1-2 1.3 Vision, Mission, and Goals of the National Heritage Area .............................. 1-3 1.4 The Heritage Area’s Preferred Alternative ....................................................... 1-4 1.5 National Signifi cance of the Heritage Area ......................................................1-6 1.6 The National Heritage Area Concept ............................................................... 1-8 1.6.1 Guiding Principles................................................................................... 1-8 1.6.2 Using the Management Plan ................................................................... 1-9 1.6.3 Terminology ............................................................................................1-9
    [Show full text]
  • (CEDS) Submitted To
    NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (CEDS) Submitted To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION JUNE 2015 Prepared by: 6311 Inducon Corporate Drive Sanborn, New York 14132 www.NiagaraCountyBusiness.com Samuel M. Ferraro, Commissioner NIAGARA COUNTY LEGISLATURE www.niagaracounty.com William L. Ross, Chair Clyde L. Burmaster, Vice-Chair Mark J. Grozio Owen T. Steed Jason A. Zona Dennis F. Virtuoso, Minority Leader Kathryn L. Lance Richard L. Andres Randy R. Bradt David E. Godfrey Anthony J. Nemi Wm. Keith McNall Richard E. Updegrove, Majority Leader Dr. John Syracuse Michael A. Hill Jeffrey M. Glatz, Niagara County Manager ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Legislator Richard E. Updegrove, Chair Legislator Kathryn Lance, Vice Chair Legislator Richard L. Andres Legislator Randy Bradt Legislator William Keith McNall Legislator Jason Zona Niagara County, New York Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2015 i COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMITTEE Ross, William L. Updegrove, Richard E. Ferraro, Samuel M. Alterio Brennen, Deanna Bittner, James Butcher, John Cliffe, Robert Collura, Joseph DeSantis, Thomas Dyster, Paul A. Ellis, Wright H. Helfrich, George Johnson-Renda, Angela R. Lovejoy Maloney, Cathy MacDonald, Kevin Oswald, Lynn M. Redman, Michael Restaino, Anthony Roma, Frank See, David Smith, Brian Solomon, Erik M. Wallace, Lee Weeks, Thomas Wolfgang, Jerald Zimmerman, Michael Glatz, Jeffrey M. * Schoepflin, Christopher * Ortt, Honorable Robert G.* Ceretto, Honorable John D. * Corwin, Honorable Jane L.* Schimminger, Honorable Robin * Walter, Honorable Raymond * Higgins, Honorable Brian * Collins, Honorable Chris* * Ex-Officio Niagara County, New York Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The development of this Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) document for Niagara County was made possible by the insightful guidance and devotion of the CEDS Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Outdoor Activities in Niagara Falls"
    "Best Outdoor Activities in Niagara Falls" Erstellt von : Cityseeker 4 Vorgemerkte Orte Niagara Falls State Park "Oldest State Park in America" Holding the distinction of being the oldest state park in the nation, this 221-acre preserve (89.4 hectares) as its name suggests also contains what has been called one of the Seven Natural Wonders of the World: Niagara Falls, its undoubted centerpiece. Also home to the Bridal Veil Falls and the American Falls, the state park is a land of cascading natural wonders. by Steve Moses Studded with a complex set of trails that lead to the spectacular beauty of the Three Sisters Islands, followed by Goat Island, which is the park's most highly-regarded picnic spot. The Cave of the Winds excursion is the nature reserve's most frequented expedition tour. The site's visitor's center features interactive displays, a movie theater for the Niagara Wonders big screen film and a virtual reality helicopter ride above the Falls. +1 716 278 1796 www.niagarafallsstatepark.com/ Robert Moses Parkway, Niagra Falls NY Cave of the Winds "Catwalk adventures behind the falls" Short of going over the falls in a barrel, there are fewer places closer to the action than this series of walkways beneath Bridal Veil Falls. Located on Goat Island, this was once a cave but water erosion has made it too dangerous to explore. An elevator takes visitors to the base of the American Falls where wooden stairs and pathways bring them within 25 by elainne_dickinson feet of the falls. You're advised to wear the raincoat and foot coverings as splashes from the falls are frequent.
    [Show full text]