DOCSLIB.ORG

IMPEACHMENT: the VIEW from the LAWYERS Attorneys from Proceedings Past Share How They Navigated an Arena with Little Guiding Precedent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IMPEACHMENT: the VIEW from the LAWYERS Attorneys from Proceedings Past Share How They Navigated an Arena with Little Guiding Precedent PLUS: The 2019 Appellate Hot List How to Develop Your Rainmaker Strategy NLJ.COM ❘ November 2019 IMPEACHMENT: THE VIEW FROM THE LAWYERS Attorneys from proceedings past share how they navigated an arena with little guiding precedent. COMPLEX COMMERCIAL CASES? RAISE THE BAR. NAM welcomes our newest panel members HON. ROBERT C. BONNER (RET.) HON. EDWARD N. CAHN (RET.) HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH (RET.) HON. STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR. (RET.) United States District Court Judge, Chief United States District Judge, United States District Judge, United States District Court Judge, Central District of California Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Court of New Jersey, Eastern District of Louisiana Special Discovery Master HON. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, SR. (RET.) HON. RAYMOND T. LYONS (RET.) HON. RICHARD B. MCQUADE, JR. (RET.) HON. ALAN H. NEVAS (RET.) United States District Judge, United States Bankruptcy Judge, United States District Court Judge, Senior United States District Court Judge Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri District of New Jersey Northern District of Ohio U.S. District Court, Connecticut Federal Judge by designation, Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa and Texas HON. ROBERT O’CONOR, JR. (RET.) HON. ANDREW J. PECK (RET.) HON. SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN (RET.) HON. OLIVER W. WANGER (RET.) United States District Judge, United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court Judge, United States District Court Judge, Southern District of Texas Southern District of New York, Southern District of New York, Eastern District of California Special Discovery Master Court Appointed Special Master Backed by one of the nation’s leading providers of alternative dispute resolution, NAM’s roster is comprised of top-tier former judges and legal practitioners – all of whom are available to assist in the resolution of your most complex, high-stakes matters. Visit www.namadr.com Conference Facilities Nationwide (800) 358-2550 | Visit www.namadr.com The Better Solution® THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2019 contents 9 FEATURES 9 IMPEACHMENT: THE VIEW FROM THE LAWYERS Attorneys who worked on proceedings of the past weigh in on the impeachment process. 15 By Jacqueline Thomsen REGULATORY ROUNDUP 5 ❘ REVOLVING DOOR 15 Trump taps two more THE APPELLATE HOT LIST Ninth Circuit nominees. We highlight 25 law firms Arnold & Porter expands that scored big wins before its SCOTUS team. the U.S. Supreme Court and federal appeals courts. 7 ❘ 1 ON 1: By ALM Staff CONVERSATIONS WITH NEWSMAKERS Credit Karma GC Susannah Stroud Wright discusses her path from Big Law to in-house. COVER ART BY SAM WARD 5 NLJ.COM ❘ NOVEMBER 2019 ❘ 1 contents THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2019 69 COLUMNS 86 ❘ PRACTICE Making the move from junior 69 ❘ CLASS ACT partner to rainmaker. Appeals court apt to shut By Lillian S. Hardy down Bristol-Myers. By Amanda Bronstad 94 ❘ MOVERS The latest in legal moves 71 ❘ JUSTICE SERVED from around the globe. Chief Justice Roberts would preside over a Trump im- 95 ❘ OPINION peachment trial if it happens. Why history supports By Tony Mauro SCOTUS term limits. By Tyler Cooper 88 ❘ LEGAL TIMES Justice Gorsuch on clerking. 71 86 88 2 ❘ NOVEMBER 2019 ❘ NLJ.COM editor’seditor’sno note Lawyers Past and Present Discuss Impeachment IMPEACHMENT. THESE DAYS IT’S IMPOSSIBLE to go an hour without hearing the word on cable news, along with evolving analysis on how the U.S. House might proceed with its inquiry of President Donald Trump. In brainstorming about our November cover issue, we wanted to delve into the per- spectives lawyers can lend on how the im- peachment process unfolds. What gems can key attorneys from past impeachment pro- ceedings offer us about the grueling hours and the massive amount of documents in- volved? What happens behind the scenes? And what are constitutional law scholars say- ing about the road ahead? Fortunately, Jacqueline Thomsen, who joined our Washington, D.C., office in Au- gust, was eager to dig in. “It was great to learn more about the im- peachment experiences of these attorneys that make them expert voices on the proceed- ings we’re seeing play out right now, ” said Thomsen, who covers courts and the legal side of politics. For more, check out our cover story. Indeed. For more jewels from these appellate heavyweights, Next, we are excited to announce our 2019 Appellate Hot List. check out our special report. The appellate luminaries featured in this year’s special report won Elsewhere in this month’s issue, read about the latest in key matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of legal moves from government to private pratice in Revolving appeal, staying true to their practice philosophies along the way. Door, and from around the globe in Movers. They recount how they tackled appeals involving everything As always, we love to hear from you. Email me at the ad- from racial gerrymandering to RICO. They also share what they dress below or tweet me @lhelemNLJ. Thanks for reading! believe are the most satisfying elements of appellate practice. For Williams & Connolly’s Lisa Blatt, the answer is pretty simple: “Winning.” Blatt, at press time, has argued 37 cases be- fore the U.S. Supreme Court, more than any other woman in U.S. history. These esteemed advocates also weigh in on the most valu- Lisa Helem able lessons they learned as young attorneys. Hogan Lovells’ [email protected] Neal Katyal in 2017 surpassed Thurgood Marshall’s record for the most Supreme Court arguments by a minority lawyer with 35. At press time, Katyal has argued 39 cases. He shares this: “Take risks. Prepare relentlessly for them. But take them.” And WilmerHale’s Danielle Spinelli offers this: “Stretch be- yond your comfort zone [and] don’t hesitate to take the lead DIEGO M. RADZINSCHI/ALM M. DIEGO even if the leaders you see don’t look like you.” NLJ.COM ❘ NOVEMBER 2019 ❘ 3 EDITORINCHIEF Lisa Helem MANAGING EDITOR Sarah Tincher ASSISTANT EDITOR Victoria Ostrander DIRECTOR, DESIGN & MULTIMEDIA JOURNALISM Tegist Legesse LAW.COM Leigh Jones, editor-in-chief; Jenna Greene, editor, Litigation Daily; Scott Graham, senior writer LEGAL BRANDS AND THEMES Hank Grezlak, editor-in-chief BUSINESS OF LAW David Bario, Lisa Shuchman, senior editors; Christine Simmons and Lizzy McLellan, editors; Anna Zhang, Asia Bureau Chief; Xiumei Dong, Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, John Kang, Meredith Hobbs, Dylan Jackson, Ryan Lovelace, Jack Newsham, Dan Packel, Patrick Smith, Samantha Stokes, David Thomas, reporters CULTURE Leigh Jones, senior editor; Vivia Chen, senior columnist; Karen Sloan, legal education editor LITIGATION Michael Riccardi, Nate Robson, Alaina Lancaster and Samantha Joseph, editors; Ross Todd, San Francisco bureau chief and global managing editor; Scott Graham, senior reporter; Amanda Bronstad, Dan M. Clark, Jason Grant, Greg Land, Raychel Lean, Robin McDonald, Tom McParland, Max Mitchell, Angela Morris, Zach Schlein, Robert Storace, Jacqueline Thomsen, Charles Toutant, Katheryn Hayes Tucker, Jane Wester, reporters REGULATORY Mike Scarcella, senior editor; MP McQueen, editor-at-large; Marcia Coyle, chief Washington correspondent; Cheryl Miller, senior writer; C. Ryan Barber, reporter INHOUSE Kibkabe Araya, editor; Sue Reisinger, senior reporter; Dan Clark, reporter TECHNOLOGY Rhys Dipshan, editor; Gabrielle Orum Hernández, reporter ALM GLOBAL NEWSROOM OPERATIONS Tasha Norman, director, content operations; Vanessa Blum, director, newsroom innovation CHIEF COPY EDITOR Alexa Woronowicz WEB EDITOR Richard Binder DATA EDITOR Ben Hancock CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Richard Acello, June D. Bell SENIOR MANAGER, DESIGN & MULTIMEDIA JOURNALISM/ART DIRECTOR Roberto Jimenez SENIOR GRAPHIC DESIGNER Chelsey Fredlund SENIOR PHOTO EDITOR/PHOTOJOURNALIST Diego M. Radzinschi SENIOR DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH Beckie Hubertus SENIOR RESEARCH MANAGERS Jeanne Graham, Carole Clark RESEARCH MANAGER Daniel Masopust * * * * * * VICE PRESIDENT/LEGAL MEDIA Richard Caruso VICE PRESIDENT/LEGAL MEDIA SALES Keith Edwards NATIONAL SALES DIRECTOR OF ALM EVENTS/SPONSORSHIPS Donald Chalphin REGIONAL SALES DIRECTORS Carlos Curbelo, Joe Pavone KEY ACCOUNT MANAGERS Shota Adamia, Caitlin Audiffred, Vivian DiStaso, Marnie Maroney, Mike Walker LAW FIRM ACCOUNT EXECUTIVES Lana Ehrlich, Brian Keenan, Annette Planey, David Winn CORPORATE ACCOUNT EXECUTIVES Regina Davidson, Brian Klunk * * * * * * BUSINESS MANAGER Rachel Freed CIRCULATION DIRECTOR Brian Kiernan GROUP ACCOUNTS [email protected] 855-808-4560 SUBSCRIPTION CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SINGLE COPY/BACK ISSUES SALES [email protected] 877-256-2472 REPRINTS Syndia J. Torres 877-257-3382 ([email protected]) PRODUCTION MANAGER Samuel Wong * * * * * * ALM SENIOR MANAGEMENT PRESIDENT & CEO Bill Carter CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER & PRESIDENT OF EVENTS Mark Fried PRESIDENT OF INFORMATION SERVICES Jon DiGiambattista CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER Molly Miller CHIEF SALES OFFICER/PAID CONTENT Allan Milloy CHIEF SALES OFFICER/MARKET SOLUTIONS Matthew Weiner CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER Jimi Li ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL Erika Maurice VICE PRESIDENT/HUMAN RESOURCES Erin Dziekan THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL (ISSN 2163-8756) is published 12 times a year by ALM Media Properties, LLC, 150 East 42 Street, Mezzanine Level, New York, NY 10017. For subscription inquiries call 1-877-256-2472 or write to The National Law Journal, Customer Service, PO Box 70162, Philadelphia, PA 19176-9628. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The National Law Journal, ALM Customer Service, 150 East 42 Street, Mezzanine Level, New York, NY 10017. Vol. 3, No. 11, ©2019 ALM Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in whole or in part is prohibited without express written permission of the publisher. 4 ❘ NOVEMBER 2019 ❘ NLJ.COM regulatory round-up REVOLVING DOOR: IN Hunsaker Takes Step Toward Confirmation Danielle Hunsaker, a former clerk for Judge But Hunsaker, the presiding judge on the Diarmuid O’Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals Washington County Circuit Court of Oregon, did for the Ninth Circuit, got a step closer in Septem- sway from the approach of many of Trump’s ju- ber to filling the seat left open on the court when dicial nominees by responding affirmatively to a O’Scannlain took senior status in 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 59, Issue 1
    Volume 60, Issue 4 Page 1023 Stanford Law Review THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal & Richard Caplan © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 60 STAN. L. REV. 1023 (2008). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal* and Richard Caplan** INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1024 I. THE NSA CONTROVERSY .................................................................................1029 A. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act................................................1029 B. The NSA Program .....................................................................................1032 II. THE PRECURSOR TO THE FDR PRECEDENT: NARDONE I AND II........................1035 A. The 1934 Communications Act .................................................................1035 B. FDR’s Thirst for Intelligence ....................................................................1037 C. Nardone I...................................................................................................1041 D. Nardone II .................................................................................................1045 III. FDR’S DEFIANCE OF CONGRESS AND THE SUPREME COURT..........................1047 A. Attorney General
    [Show full text]
  • The Allegheny County Bar in the Eighties Frank C
    The Allegheny County Bar in the Eighties Frank C. McGirk That Iwas admitted to the Bar of Allegheny County in 1880, and am still in the practice of my profession, is most likely the reason Iwas chosen to deliver this address. Iknew the great lawyers of that decade, —many of them intimately, —and frequently tried cases with and against them, and while Ithen knew their peculiarities and abilities, and the many stories then current about them, lapse of time and a failing memory willprevent the repetition of a great many matters of much interest, and jovial happen- ings of those old days. From the earliest days of this County, it has been noted for its great lawyers. Such men as Alexander Ad- dison, James Ross, Hugh Henry Brackenridge, John Woods, Thomas Collins, William Wilkins, Henry Baldwin, James Mountain, Samuel Roberts, Walter Forward, John H. Chap- lin,Neville B. Craig, Charles Shaler, Richard Biddle, John Henry Hopkins, and James Hall, of the early Pittsburgh Bar, and concerning whom, the late Judge Daniel Agnew delivered a most interesting address before the Allegheny County Bar Association on December 1, 1888, made our Bar famous throughout the land and shed great glory on the Pittsburgh lawyer. But the lawyers of the Eighties were just as great. The limits of time allowed me for this address willpermit me to refer only to a small number of those who were fam- ous in the Eighties, and no doubt Imay overlook some whom my brethren at the Bar will think well deserve remem- brance. As Judge Agnew said in his address : "The life of an upright, honorable and learned lawyer is full of instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firms (* Indicates High Honor Roll) Aceves & Associates, PLLC
    Law Firms (* indicates High Honor Roll) Aceves & Associates, PLLC Joyce Aceves-Amaya * Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Kenneth Alderfer * Kimberly Ball * Sarah Banco Stephanie Bazell Allison Binney * G. Scott Binnings * Michael Bonsignore * Katie Brossy * Paul Butler Mary Elizabeth Cameron Chip Cannon Blair Cantfil * John Capehart * Courtney Cardin * Johny Chaklader * Sean Conway * Catherine Creely * Elizabeth Cyr Christian Davis Joseph Decker * Ruthanne Deutsch * John Dowd * Eugene Elder * Ashraf Fawzy Charles Franklin * Francine Friedman * Laura Geyer * Diana Gillis Jonathan Goodrich * Gregory Granitto * Daniel Graver Juliet Gray * Karen Green Megan Greer * Spencer Griffith * Paul Gutermann Sandra Hallmark * Matthew Hamm Brittani Head * Scott Heimberg Michael-Corey Hinton * Kristen Howard Robert Huffman Maka Hutson * Sakisha Jackson * John Jacob Howard Jacobson * Bernd Janzen * Gola Javadi Emily Johnson * Scott Johnson * Charles Johnson * Taylor Jones Amanda Kane * Ashley Keapproth Karol Kepchar Hyongsoon Kim * John Koerner * Abigail Kohlman * Melissa Laurenza Kathleen Lawrence * William Leahy * Robert Lian Sally Liang Julia Lippman * Mark Macdougall * Suthima Malayaman * Michael Mandel * Mark Mansour * Samuel Marll Thomas McCarthy Jr. * Sheila McCorkle * Mollie McGowen Lemberg * Yujin McNamara James Meggesto * Patricia Millett * Brandon Morris * Thomas Moyer Constance O'Connor * Nathan Oleson * Joe Osborne * Kapil Pandit Jenny Patten * Carolyn Perez * Erin Peters Raphael Prober * David Quigley Jillie Richards * Michael Rossetti Sarah
    [Show full text]
  • Just Two Weeks Ago, I Had the Honor of Presiding Over My Second Yale Law School Commencement
    June 5, 2006 Dear Graduates and Friends: Just two weeks ago, I had the honor of presiding over my second Yale Law School commencement. The weather was perfect and the mood festive, as we graduated a spectacular class. We listened to stirring speeches from our faculty speaker, Deputy Dean Dan Kahan, and Yale’s newest Doctor of Laws, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, a historic figure who, fittingly, both succeeded and was succeeded by graduates of our School (Justices Potter Stewart ’41 and Samuel Alito ’75). While it is too early to tell where the class of 2006 will end up, several have offers to teach or research at top law schools; others have completed or will complete joint degrees. Some will work at law firms, others will start judicial clerkships. At least one has already been invited to clerk for the U.S. Supreme Court, following the eight Yale Law graduates who clerked there in October Term 2005. Another will clerk for the International Court of Justice, joining another Yale Law graduate clerking there, as well as the Court’s new President, Rosalyn Higgins, JSD ’62, the first woman to hold that esteemed position. Seventeen current and recent graduates will begin public interest fellowships in the United States and abroad, and one has already successfully argued a case at the Second Circuit. The unique class just graduated included five students who were homeschooled; one who called for a carbon-neutral graduation; and another who days before graduation published an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times explaining why the popular television show Lost illustrates the defects of a society lacking the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • From Criminal to Citizen: How the Evolution of Public Opinion Won Gay Marriage in the Courtroom
    From Criminal to Citizen: How The Evolution of Public Opinion Won Gay Marriage In The Courtroom Sabrina Singer Senior Thesis Department of History Barnard College, Columbia University Advisor: Robert McCaughey Singer 1 Prologue A warm tropical breeze brushed my face as I stood in the Miami Beach Botanical Gardens waiting for the mayor to begin. The crowd murmured with excitement, looking around at each other with anticipation as the sun set behind the palm trees. I glanced over at the couple I had met earlier in the evening. They were dressed in matching tuxedos, holding hands, waiting. The drag queen next to me shifted her weight back and forth, impatient. Then, finally, the speeches were over and the ceremonies could begin. The judge had only lifted the stay on gay marriage in the early hours of the morning, yet hundreds of gay couples lined-up to walk down the makeshift aisle to the hastily constructed altar to be married by the mayor. Dressed in suits, biking clothes, jean shorts, and bathing suits, couple after couple affirmed their love and commitment. Same-sex marriage had come to Florida. I had witnessed similar jubilation in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building two summers prior when the Court issued its momentous ruling in United States vs. Windsor, overturning the Defense of Marriage Act that had prevented the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage. Beholding the relief and joy on the faces of the people swarming the steps of the Supreme Court building, I knew that I had chosen the right issue to believe in.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report
    The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report “The Courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise will instead of JUDGMENT, the consequences would be the substitution of their pleasure for that of the legislative body.” The Federalist 78 THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY aw schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a L form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities. This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community.
    [Show full text]
  • Oh No, Ross and Carrie! Theme Song” by Brian Keith Dalton
    00:00:00 Music Music “Oh No, Ross and Carrie! Theme Song” by Brian Keith Dalton. A jaunty, upbeat instrumental. 00:00:08 Ross Host Hello, and welcome to Oh No, Ross and Carrie!, the show where we Blocher don’t just report on fringe science, spirituality, and claims of the paranormal, no, we take part ourselves. 00:00:17 Carrie Host Yup, when they make the claims, we show up so you don’t have to. Poppy I’m Carrie Poppy. 00:00:20 Ross Host And I’m Ross Blocher, and we are joined with two exciting guests today. We have Susan Gerbic— 00:00:25 Susan Guest Yay! Gerbic 00:00:26 Ross Host —and Mark Edward. 00:00:27 Mark Guest Hey. Edward 00:00:28 Ross Host Welcome, and welcome back, Mark. 00:00:29 Mark Guest Thank you. It’s been awhile. 00:00:30 Ross Host I had to look this up. Our thirteenth episode was an interview with you. 00:00:34 Susan Guest Carrie said this house was weird— 00:00:35 Mark Guest Blissfully creepy, which I really liked. [Carrie laughs.] 00:00:38 Susan Guest He’s bringing it to my house in Salinas now. My house is becoming blissfully creepy, it’s great. 00:00:43 Ross Host Wonderful. 00:00:44 Carrie Host So you’re moving in. You’re shacking up. 00:00:46 Mark Guest Yeah, we’re shacking up. 00:00:47 Susan Guest It’s only been ten years. 00:00:48 Mark Guest After ten years, you know.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Cruz Promoted Himself and Conservative Causes As Texas’ Solicito
    FORMER STATE SOLICITORS GENERAL AND OTHER STATE AG OFFICE ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ACTIVE JUDGES by Dan Schweitzer, Director and Chief Counsel, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy, National Association of Attorneys General March 18, 2021 Former State Solicitors General (and Deputy Solicitors General) Federal Courts of Appeals (11) Jeffrey Sutton – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Timothy Tymkovich – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) Kevin Newsom – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) Allison Eid – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) James Ho – Fifth Circuit (Texas SG) S. Kyle Duncan – Fifth Circuit (Louisiana SG) Andrew Oldham – Fifth Circuit (Texas Deputy SG) Britt Grant – Eleventh Circuit (Georgia SG) Eric Murphy – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Lawrence VanDyke – Ninth Circuit (Montana and Nevada SG) Andrew Brasher – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) State High Courts (6) Stephen McCullough – Virginia Supreme Court Nels Peterson – Georgia Supreme Court Gregory D’Auria – Connecticut Supreme Court John Lopez – Arizona Supreme Court Sarah Warren – Georgia Supreme Court Monica Marquez – Colorado Supreme Court (Deputy SG) State Intermediate Appellate Courts (8) Kent Cattani – Arizona Court of Appeals Karen King Mitchell – Missouri Court of Appeals Kent Wetherell – Florida Court of Appeals (Deputy SG) Scott Makar – Florida Court of Appeals Timothy Osterhaus – Florida Court of Appeals Peter Sacks – Massachusetts Court of Appeals Clyde Wadsworth – Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Gordon Burns – California Court of Appeal (Deputy SG) Federal District Court (11) Gary Feinerman – Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Argument: the Essential Guide
    ORAL ARGUMENT: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE by Brooke J. Bowman Kirsten K. Davis Lance N. Long Jason S. Palmer Stephanie A. Vaughan Table of Contents Information about the Earlier Version ..........................................................................................iii Copyright ...................................................................................................................................................iii Citation Information .............................................................................................................................iii Limitations on Use .................................................................................................................................iii About the Authors .................................................................................................................................iii About Stetson’s Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication ....................... iv Chapter 1: Oral Argument Matters: An Introduction .............................................................. 1 Chapter 2: Understanding the Purpose of Oral Argument: Take a Judge-Centered Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 3: Preparing to Persuade: Get Ready to Argue ......................................................... 5 Chapter 4: Organizing the Oral Argument: Balance Structure with Flexibility ......... 19 Chapter 5: Answering Questions: Know
    [Show full text]
  • Bolderboulder 10K Results
    BolderBOULDER 1994 - BolderBOULDER 10K - results OnlineRaceResults.com NAME DIV TIME ---------------------- ------- ----------- Matthew Lavigne 22 John Mirth M32 31:11 Jonathan Heese M36 31:37 Matt Schubert M24 31:58 Glen Mays M24 31:59 Brett Burt M28 32:07 Rodolfo Gomez M43 32:16 Chris Prior M34 32:21 Scott Kent M27 32:27 Darrin Rohr M29 32:30 Steve Roch M30 32:43 Rob Welo M30 32:43 John Ingram M22 32:44 John Pendergraft M27 32:45 Gerard Ostheimer M25 32:52 Mark Allen M36 32:56 Chris Severy M17 33:08 Andy Ames M31 33:09 Daniel King M34 33:10 Ignacio Morales M42 33:11 Richard Bishop M36 33:12 Brendan Reilly M34 33:16 Aaron Salomon M18 33:17 Dave Nelson M32 33:18 Rick Ames M33 33:26 Dennis Lima M32 33:33 Michael McCarrick M28 33:38 Michael Trunkes M31 33:43 Joe Sheely M35 33:44 Wilbur Ferdinand M32 33:47 Ricardo Rojas M42 33:50 Jeff Rosenow M37 33:52 Robert Love M30 33:54 Chris Borton M18 33:56 Marc Reider M27 34:01 Jason Porter M24 34:03 Sean Coster M18 34:04 Jon Schoenberg M31 34:05 Troy Pickett M31 34:06 Joe Wilson M18 34:07 Michael Sandrock M36 34:08 James Johnson M25 34:09 Bern Gever M34 34:11 Kevin Hilton M22 34:13 Chris Harrison M30 34:15 Lee Stringer M26 34:17 Douglas Hugill M33 34:20 Dominic Wyzomirski M34 34:22 Edward Boggess M36 34:23 John Wiberg M26 34:25 Andrew Crook M35 34:26 Chris Rodriguez M25 34:27 Allan Kupczak M33 34:28 Alex Furman M16 34:29 Daniel Hanewall M32 34:30 Mohamed Hajoui M32 34:32 Zeke Tiernan M18 34:33 Jason Nicholas M24 34:34 Jerry Duckworth M32 34:35 Parrick Aris M37 34:36 Thom Richman M39 34:37 Todd Reeser
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Defamation League
    Jewish Privilege E. Michael Jones Fidelity Press 206 Marquette Avenue South Bend, Indiana 46617 www.culturewars.com www.fidelitypress.org © E. Michael Jones, 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Fidelity Press. Contents What Is Hate Speech? The ADL and the FBI Online Hate Index Capistrano on Jewish Privilege Homosexual Proxy Warrior Chubby Lesbian Kike Who Defines Hate? What Is Hate Speech? In keeping with the so-called “Christchurch Call to Action” which flowed from a meeting of government officials and internet giants on May 15, 2019 in Paris, Facebook issued an internal document entitled “Hate Agent Policy Review,” which, according to Breitbart, which received a copy from a source inside Facebook, “outlines a series of ‘signals’ that Facebook uses to determine if someone ought to be categorized as a ‘hate agent’ and banned from the platform.”[1] The guidelines were simultaneously draconian and incoherent. You can be designated as a “hate agent” if “you praise the wrong individual, interview them, or appear at events alongside them.”[2] Hate agent status is evidently contagious because Facebook may designate you as a hate agent if you associate with a “Designated Hate Entity,” like the Englishman Tommy Robinson. You can also be designated a hate agent “merely for speaking neutrally about individuals and organizations that the social network considers hateful.” Facebook tagged someone in October of last year simply because he gave what they considered was a “neutral representation of John Kinsman,” who is a member of “Proud Boys,” a group which Facebook does not like and does not want you to like.
    [Show full text]