Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 53/Monday, March 19

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

16082 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices ATTACHMENT 1—GENERAL TARGET SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING AND RESOLVING REQUESTS FOR ACCESS TO SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED NON-SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION AND SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION IN THIS PROCEEDING—Continued Day Event/Activity 190 ......... (Receipt +180) If NRC staff finds standing, need to know for SGI, and trustworthiness and reliability, deadline for NRC staff to file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-disclosure Affidavit (or to make a determination that the proposed recipient of SGI is not trustworthy or reliable). Note: Before the Office of Administration makes an adverse determination regarding access to SGI, the proposed recipient must be provided an opportunity to correct or explain information. 205 ......... Deadline for petitioner to seek reversal of a final adverse NRC staff trustworthiness or reliability determination either before the pre- siding officer or another designated officer under 10 CFR 2.705(c)(3)(iv). A ............ If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sen- sitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse de- termination by the NRC staff. A + 3 ...... Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI and/or SGI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. A + 28 .... Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI and/or SGI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI or SGI contentions by that later deadline. A + 53 .... (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI and/or SGI. A + 60 .... (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. >A + 60 .. Decision on contention admission. [FR Doc. 2012–6541 Filed 3–16–12; 8:45 am] arrangements can be made. Thirty-five Dated: March 7, 2012. BILLING CODE 7590–01–P hard copies of each presentation or Cayetano Santos, handout should be provided to the DFO Chief, Reactor Safety Branch, Advisory thirty minutes before the meeting. In Committee on Reactor Safeguards. NUCLEAR REGULATORY addition, one electronic copy of each [FR Doc. 2012–6543 Filed 3–16–12; 8:45 am] COMMISSION presentation should be emailed to the BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Advisory Committee on Reactor DFO one day before the meeting. If an Safeguards (ACRS), Meeting of the electronic copy cannot be provided within this timeframe, presenters NUCLEAR REGULATORY ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and COMMISSION Procedures; Notice of Meeting should provide the DFO with a CD containing each presentation at least [EA–12–051; NRC–2012–0067; Docket Nos. The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning thirty minutes before the meeting. and Procedures will hold a meeting on (as shown in Attachment 1), License Nos. Electronic recordings will be permitted (as shown in Attachment 1), or April 11, 2012, Room T–2B3, 11545 only during those portions of the Construction Permit Nos. (as shown in Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. meeting that are open to the public. Attachment 1)] The entire meeting will be open to Detailed procedures for the conduct of public attendance, with the exception of and participation in ACRS meetings In the Matter of All Power Reactor a portion that may be closed pursuant were published in the Federal Register Licensees and Holders of Construction to 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) and (6) to discuss Permits in Active Or Deferred Status: on October 17, 2011, (76 FR 64126– organizational and personnel matters Order Modifying Licenses With Regard 64127). that relate solely to the internal To Reliable Spent Fuel Pool personnel rules and practices of the Information regarding changes to the Instrumentation (Effective ACRS, and information the release of agenda, whether the meeting has been Immediately) which would constitute a clearly canceled or rescheduled, and the time unwarranted invasion of personal allotted to present oral statements can I privacy. be obtained by contacting the identified The Licensees and construction The agenda for the subject meeting DFO. Moreover, in view of the permit (CP) holders1 identified in shall be as follows: possibility that the schedule for ACRS Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses Wednesday, April 11, 2012—11 a.m. meetings may be adjusted by the issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Until 12 p.m. Chairman as necessary to facilitate the Commission (NRC or Commission) authorizing operation and/or The Subcommittee will discuss conduct of the meeting, persons planning to attend should check with construction of nuclear power plants in proposed ACRS activities and related accordance with the Atomic Energy Act matters. The Subcommittee will gather the DFO if such rescheduling would result in a major inconvenience. of 1954, as amended, and Title 10 of the information, analyze relevant issues and Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) facts, and formulate proposed positions If attending this meeting, please enter Part 50, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of and actions, as appropriate, for through the One White Flint North Production and Utilization Facilities,’’ deliberation by the Full Committee. building, 11555 Rockville Pike, and Part 52, ‘‘Licenses, Certifications, Members of the public desiring to Rockville, MD. After registering with and Approvals for Nuclear Power provide oral statements and/or written security, please contact Mr. Theron Plants.’’ comments should notify the Designated Brown (240–888–9835) to be escorted to Federal Official (DFO), Antonio Dias the meeting room. 1 CP holders, as used in this Order, includes CPs, (Telephone 301–415–6805 or Email: in active or deferred status, as identified in [email protected]) five days prior to Attachment 1 to this Order (i.e., Watts Bar, Unit 2; the meeting, if possible, so that and Bellefonte, Units 1 and 2) VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:40 Mar 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices 16083 II temperature reaction of steam and United States. Therefore, continued On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 zirconium fuel cladding generating operation and continued licensing earthquake struck off the coast of the hydrogen gas. This concern persisted activities do not pose an imminent Japanese island of Honshu. The primarily due to a lack of readily threat to public health and safety. earthquake resulted in a large tsunami, available and reliable information on However, the NRC’s assessment of new estimated to have exceeded 14 meters water levels in the spent fuel pools. insights from the events at Fukushima (45 feet) in height, that inundated the Helicopter water drops, water cannons, Dai-ichi leads the NRC staff to conclude Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant and cement delivery vehicles with that additional requirements must be site. articulating booms were used to refill imposed on Licensees and CP holders to The earthquake and tsunami the pools, which diverted resources and increase the capability of nuclear power produced widespread devastation across attention from other efforts. Subsequent plants to mitigate beyond-design-basis northeastern Japan and significantly analysis determined that the water level external events. These additional affected the infrastructure and industry in the Unit 4 spent fuel pool did not requirements represent a substantial drop below the top of the stored fuel increase in the protection of public in the northeastern coastal areas of and no significant fuel damage health and safety. The Commission has Japan. When the earthquake occurred, occurred. The lack of information on the decided to administratively exempt this Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1, 2, and 3 condition of the spent fuel pools Order from applicable provisions of the contributed to a poor understanding of Backfit Rule, 10 CFR 50.109, and the were in operation and Units 4, 5, and 6 possible radiation releases and issue finality requirements in 10 CFR were shut down for routine refueling adversely impacted effective 52.63 and 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix D, and maintenance activities. The Unit 4 prioritization of emergency response Paragraph VIII. reactor fuel was offloaded to the Unit 4 actions by decision makers. Additional details on an acceptable spent fuel pool. Following the Following the events at the approach for complying with this Order earthquake, the three operating units Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power will be contained in final interim staff automatically shut down and offsite plant, the NRC established a senior-level guidance (ISG) scheduled to be issued power was lost to the entire facility. The agency task force referred to as the Near- by the NRC in August 2012. This emergency diesel generators (EDGs) Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF guidance will include a template to be started at all six units providing was tasked with conducting a used for the plan that will be submitted alternating current (ac) electrical power systematic and methodical review of the in accordance with Section IV, to critical systems at each unit. The NRC regulations and processes and Condition C.1 below. facility response to the earthquake determining if the agency should make III appears to have been normal. additional improvements to these Approximately 40 minutes following programs in light of the events at Reasonable assurance of adequate the earthquake and shutdown of the Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a result of this protection of public health and safety operating units, the first large tsunami review, the NTTF developed a and assurance of the common defense wave inundated the site, followed by comprehensive set of recommendations, and security are the fundamental NRC additional waves.
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework

    A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework

    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KUHIKA GUPTA Norman, Oklahoma 2013 ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ______________________________ Dr. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Carol L. Silva, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Weible ______________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by KUHIKA GUPTA 2013 All Rights Reserved. Dedication For my incredible parents, Anil and Alpana Gupta, for making all of this possible, and my husband, Joseph T. Ripberger, for being a constant inspiration. Acknowledgements This dissertation would not be possible were it not for the invaluable support I have received throughout my journey as an undergraduate at Delhi University in India, a graduate student at the University of Warwick in England, and my pursuit of a doctorate at the University of Oklahoma in the United States. During my time at Delhi University, Ramu Manivannan was an amazing mentor who taught me the value of making a difference in both academia and the real world. My greatest debt is to Hank Jenkins-Smith and Carol Silva at the University of Oklahoma, whose encouragement, guidance, and intellectual advice has made this journey possible. I am deeply grateful for their unending support; this dissertation would not exist without them.
  • Kewaunee Power Station Applicant's Environmental Report Operating

    Kewaunee Power Station Applicant's Environmental Report Operating

    Kewaunee Power Station Applicant’s Environmental Report Operating License Renewal Stage Kewaunee Power Station Applicant’s Environmental Report Table of Contents Operating License Renewal Stage TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations..............................................................................................AA-1 Chapter 1 - Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Environmental Report Scope and Methodology.......................................................... 1-1 1.3 Kewaunee Power Station Licensee and Ownership ................................................... 1-2 1.4 References.................................................................................................................. 1-5 Chapter 2 - Site and Environmental Interfaces ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Location and Features ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Aquatic Ecological Communities................................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Groundwater Resources ............................................................................................. 2-9 2.4 Critical and Important Terrestrial Habits ...................................................................
  • Assessment of the Nuclear Power Industry

    Assessment of the Nuclear Power Industry

    Assessment of the Nuclear Power Industry – Final Report June 2013 Navigant Consulting, Inc. For EISPC and NARUC Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Assessment of the Nuclear Power Industry Study 5: Assessment of the Location of New Nuclear and Uprating Existing Nuclear Whitepaper 5: Consideration of other Incentives/Disincentives for Development of Nuclear Power prepared for Eastern Interconnection States’ Planning Council and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedford Street, Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803 781.270.0101 www.navigant.com Table of Contents Forward ....................................................................................................................................... ix Basic Nuclear Power Concepts ................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 5 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Early Years – (1946-1957) ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.1.1 Shippingport ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.1.2 Power Reactor Demonstration Program ..............................................................................
  • Gao-13-493, Nuclear Reactor License Renewal: Nrc

    Gao-13-493, Nuclear Reactor License Renewal: Nrc

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely GAO-13-493 May 2013 NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL NRC Generally Follows Documented Procedures, but Its Revisions to Environmental Review Guidance Have Not Been Timely Highlights of GAO-13-493, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Many U.S. commercial nuclear power The scope of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) license renewal reactors are reaching the end of their process focuses on managing the effects of aging on a reactor and its associated initial 40-year operating period. To systems, structures, and components (i.e. safety) and assessing certain potential continue operating, their owners must environmental impacts of extending a reactor’s operating-life. As a result, reviews renew their licenses with NRC, the done as part of this process are not required to address as many topics as independent federal agency reviews for initial licensing, which include security and emergency planning. responsible for licensing and regulating nuclear reactors. NRC evaluates NRC has regularly updated the safety review guidance it uses in the license license renewal applications under two renewal process but has not revised most of its environmental review regulations parallel reviews for safety and potential and guidance since they were first issued. NRC has revised its safety review environmental impacts. NRC’s license guidance twice—in 2005 and 2010—and has issued interim updates for selected renewal process has received safety issues between those revisions.
  • Mailing List of U.S. Domestic Nuclear Utilities

    Mailing List of U.S. Domestic Nuclear Utilities

    Mailing List of Domestic Nuclear Utilities ",Plant .. I Address Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Vice President, Operations Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. 1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Eric A. Larson Beaver Valley Power Station P. O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 & 3 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 & 2 George T. Hamrick, Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 Byron Station, Units 1 & 2/Braidwood Station, Michael J. Pacilio Units 1 & 2 Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon -Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Mr. Adam C. Heflin Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Union Electric Company Ameren Missouri P.O. Box 620 -Fulton, MO 65251 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-4702 Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 Mr. Kelvin Henderson Site Vice President Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 All -2- Plant Address Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Rd. Warrenville, IL 60555 Columbia Generating Station Mr.
  • Gao-13-743, Nuclear Power

    Gao-13-743, Nuclear Power

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2013 NUCLEAR POWER Analysis of Regional Differences and Improved Access to Information Could Strengthen NRC Oversight GAO-13-743 September 2013 NUCLEAR POWER Analysis of Regional Differences and Improved Access to Information Could Strengthen NRC Oversight Highlights of GAO-13-743, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The 2011 disaster at Japan's The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) relies on its staff’s professional Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power judgment in implementing its processes for overseeing the safety of U.S. Plant demonstrated that unexpected commercial nuclear power reactors. In implementing this oversight, NRC nuclear accidents with extreme allocates specific roles and responsibilities to resident inspectors assigned to consequences can occur and, thus, each plant, regional officials at one of four regional offices responsible for most heightened concerns about NRC’s oversight activities, headquarters officials, and the nuclear power industry. NRC ability to oversee the safety of U.S. also builds into its processes incentives for plant managers to identify concerns commercial nuclear power reactors. about reactor safety, report those concerns to NRC, and take prompt actions to NRC oversees safety through multiple correct them. NRC’s processes for identifying and assessing findings and processes, such as physically violations are based on prescribed agency procedures and include several points inspecting reactors and also responding to signs of declining where NRC staff must exercise their professional judgment, such as determining performance (i.e., findings) or whether issues of concern identified during physical inspections constitute violations of its requirements.
  • Nuclear Power Facilities in the Great Lakes Basin

    Nuclear Power Facilities in the Great Lakes Basin

    Nuclear Power Facilities in the Great Lakes Basin Background Report Compendium of information related to the current status and decommissioning of Great Lakes nuclear power facilities to support the development of a Great Lakes Water Quality Board report Prepared for the Great Lakes Water Quality Board to be submitted to the International Joint Commission September 2019 Acknowledgements Ryan C. Graydon – Author and Primary Researcher [email protected] Paisley A. Meyer – Research Assistant [email protected] Mark J. Burrows – Project Manager, COR [email protected] Suggested citation: Graydon RC, Meyer PA, and Burrows MJ. September 2019. Nuclear Power Facilities in the Great Lakes Basin: Background Report. Prepared for the International Joint Commission’s Great Lakes Water Quality Board. For more information on this report, please visit https://ijc.org/en/wqb. Permissions With the permission of Canadian Standards Association, (operating as “CSA Group”), 178 Rexdale Blvd., Toronto, ON, M9W 1R3, material is reproduced from CSA Group’s standard CSA N294-09 – Decommissioning of facilities containing nuclear substances. This material is not the complete and official position of CSA Group on the referenced subject, which is represented solely by the Standard in its entirety. While use of the material has been authorized, CSA Group is not responsible for the manner in which the data is presented, nor for any representations and interpretations. No further reproduction is permitted. For more information or to purchase standard(s) from CSA Group, please visit store.csagroup.org or call 1-800-463-6727. With the permission of Natural Resources Canada: Uranium and Radioactive Waste Division, material is adapted and reproduced from Inventory of Radioactive Waste in Canada 2016.
  • EPRI Guidance for Transition from Operations to Decommissioning, February 16-18, Lyon, France

    EPRI Guidance for Transition from Operations to Decommissioning, February 16-18, Lyon, France

    PREDEC 2016: EPRI Guidance for Transition from Operations to Decommissioning, February 16-18, Lyon, France EPRI Guidance for Transition from Operations to Decommissioning Richard McGrath* Richard Reid Electric Power Research Institute 3420 Hillview Ave Palo Alto, California 94504 *corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: decommissioning, transition, regulatory framework Abstract A wide range of key activities are necessary after permanent shutdown of a nuclear power plant before active dismantlement of the plant can begin. This period is typically referred to as the transition period. In some cases these activities are prescribed by regulation and in others they may be more practically driven or even optional. In either case, planning for transition activities should optimally take place prior to final shutdown. Additionally, execution of some transition period activities, such as filing required regulatory submittals, may be performed prior to plant shut down. In addition to general transition period activities such as defueling, management of operational wastes, fulfilling regulatory requirements and changes to plant technical specifications, there are a number of optional activities that may have a long-range impact on future decommissioning activities. This includes activities such as the timing of staff reductions and performance of chemical decontamination. EPRI is nearing completion of a project to develop guidance for transitioning a nuclear power plant to decommissioning. This project includes the following elements:
  • Communities Adjust to Impending Loss of Kewaunee Power Station | Green Bay Press Gazette | Greenbaypressgazette.Com 4/28/13 12:27 PM

    Communities Adjust to Impending Loss of Kewaunee Power Station | Green Bay Press Gazette | Greenbaypressgazette.Com 4/28/13 12:27 PM

    Communities adjust to impending loss of Kewaunee Power Station | Green Bay Press Gazette | greenbaypressgazette.com 4/28/13 12:27 PM JOBS CARS HOMES APARTMENTS SHOPPING CLASSIFIEDS LOG IN SUBSCRIBE ACTIVATE E-NEWSPAPER HELP News Packers Sports Business Living Opinion Obituaries Photos/Video FEATURED: Calendar Investigative reports Entertainment Yard MD Preps Blog Day Trips Find what you are looking for ... SEARCH ADVERTISEMENT Communities adjust to impending loss of Kewaunee Power Station Apr. 27, 2013 | Comments A A ADVERTISEMENT Most Popular Most Commented More Headlines 1 Offense set to shift gears with top RB prospects 2 Notebook: Packers reportedly taking trade offers on Bishop, Starks 3 Quarterback, safety among undrafted rookies to sign with Packers Purchase Image 4 McCarthy reacts to Packers' draft Ann Bies, manager at Fat Boyz, shares a laugh with a customer inside Fat Boyz in Tisch Mills on Wednesday, April 23, 2013. Fat Boyz is a popular spot for plant workers. Evan Siegle/Press-Gazette Media / Evan Siegle/Press-Gazette Media 5 Three draftees' checkered pasts don't deter Thompson Written by Richard Ryman KEWAUNEE COUNTY — As the effect of the Kewaunee Power Press-Gazette Media Station closing ripples out from the shore of Lake Michigan into the community, Fat Boyz 2 bar and grill, five miles away in Tisch Mills, FILED UNDER will be one of the first businesses to feel the impact. Most Viewed Business Manager Ann Bies said Kewaunee and Point Beach Nuclear Plant employees and contractors make up about one-third of Fat Boyz 2’s business. Losing the Kewaunee contingent, including the contract employees who come in every 18 months to work refueling http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20130427/GPG03/304270261/ Page 1 of 4 Communities adjust to impending loss of Kewaunee Power Station | Green Bay Press Gazette | greenbaypressgazette.com 4/28/13 12:27 PM outages, will be a blow.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 53/Monday, March 19, 2012/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 53/Monday, March 19, 2012/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices 16091 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2012–0068] Order Modifying Licenses With Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Effective Immediately) In the Matter of: ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND HOLDERS OF CON- Docket Nos. (as shown in Attachment 1) License Nos. (as shown in STRUCTION PERMITS IN ACTIVE OR DEFERRED STATUS. Attachment 1) or Construction Permit Nos. (as shown in Attach- ment 1)) EA–12–049 I Approximately 40 minutes following As directed by the Commission’s staff the earthquake and shutdown of the requirements memorandum (SRM) for The Licensees and construction SECY–11–0093, the NRC staff reviewed 1 operating units, the first large tsunami permits (CP) holders identified in wave inundated the site, followed by the NTTF recommendations within the Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses additional waves. The tsunami caused context of the NRC’s existing regulatory and CPs issued by the U.S. Nuclear extensive damage to site facilities and framework and considered the various Regulatory Commission (NRC or resulted in a complete loss of all ac regulatory vehicles available to the NRC Commission) authorizing operation and/ electrical power at Units 1 through 5, a to implement the recommendations. or construction of nuclear power plants condition known as station blackout. In SECY–11–0124 and SECY–11–0137 in accordance with the Atomic Energy addition, all direct current electrical established the staff’s prioritization of Act of 1954, as amended, and Title 10 power was lost early in the event on the recommendations based upon the of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 Units 1 and 2 and after some period of potential safety enhancements.
  • Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting Of

    Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities for Storage and Disposal: Analyzing Variations over Time, Events, and Program Designs Prepared for US Department of Energy Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project Hank C. Jenkins-Smith Carol L. Silva Kerry G. Herron Kuhika G. Ripberger Matthew Nowlin Joseph Ripberger Center for Risk and Crisis Management, University of Oklahoma Evaristo “Tito” Bonano Rob P. Rechard Sandia National Laboratories February 2013 FCRD-NFST-2013-000076 SAND 2013-0032P Public Preferences Related to Consent Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities ii February 2013 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the US Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
  • Prioritization of Response Due Dates

    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 11, 2012 All Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status SUBJECT: PRIORITIZATION OF RESPONSE DUE DATES FOR REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 50.54(f) REGARDING FLOODING HAZARD REEVALUATIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION 2.1 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE REVIEW OF INSIGHTS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT On March 12, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Section 54(f). The purpose of that request was to gather sufficient information to enable the NRC staff to determine whether the nuclear plant licenses under your responsibility should be modified, suspended, or revoked. Enclosure 2 to that letter directed the reevaluation of flooding hazards at operating reactor sites. The required response section of Enclosure 2 indicated that the Hazard Reevaluation Report would be due within one to three years from the date of the letter. Further, it specified that NRC would provide a prioritization plan indicating deadlines for individual plants to complete the reevaluations. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the prioritization plan developed by the NRC and the resultant list of due dates for all sites. Since the issuance of the information request, the NRC has held multiple public meetings and teleconferences to gather stakeholder feedback on this topic. On March 15, 2012, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), on the industry's behalf, provided a methodology for categorizing flooding reevaluations using indicators for susceptibility and complexity.