DOCSLIB.ORG

Threatened Species Springs Cave Crayfish, the Oregon Document Was Made on October 5, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Threatened Species Springs Cave Crayfish, the Oregon Document Was Made on October 5, 2017 46618 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and of the fisher, Florida Keys mole skink, Wildlife Service (Service), announce 12- Great Sand Dunes tiger beetle, Kirtland’s Fish and Wildlife Service month findings on petitions to list 25 snake, Pacific walrus, and San Felipe species as endangered or threatened gambusia is not warranted at this time. 50 CFR Part 17 species under the Endangered Species However, we ask the public to submit to Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After a us at any time any new information that [4500090022] thorough review of the best available becomes available concerning the scientific and commercial information, stressors to any of the species listed Endangered and Threatened Wildlife we find that listing 14 Nevada above or their habitats. and Plants; 12-Month Findings on springsnail species, Barbour’s map DATES: Petitions To List 25 Species as turtle, Bicknell’s thrush, Big Blue The finding announced in this Endangered or Threatened Species Springs cave crayfish, the Oregon document was made on October 5, 2017. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Cascades—California population and ADDRESSES: Detailed descriptions of the Interior. Black Hills population of the black- basis for each of these findings are backed woodpecker, the eastern available on the Internet at http:// ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition population of the boreal toad, the www.regulations.gov under the findings. Northern Rocky Mountains population following docket numbers: Species Docket No. 14 Nevada springsnails ............................................................................................................................................. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0001 Barbour’s map turtle .................................................................................................................................................. FWS–R4–ES–2017–0065 Bicknell’s thrush ......................................................................................................................................................... FWS–R5–ES–2012–0056 Big Blue Springs cave crayfish .................................................................................................................................. FWS–R4–ES–2017–0066 Black-backed woodpecker ......................................................................................................................................... FWS–R8–ES–2013–0034 Boreal toad ................................................................................................................................................................ FWS–R6–ES–2012–0003 Fisher ......................................................................................................................................................................... FWS–R6–ES–2015–0104 Florida Keys mole skink ............................................................................................................................................ FWS–R4–ES–2017–0067 Great Sand Dunes tiger beetle .................................................................................................................................. FWS–R6–ES–2017–0068 Kirtland’s snake ......................................................................................................................................................... FWS–R3–ES–2017–0039 Pacific walrus ............................................................................................................................................................. FWS–R7–ES–2017–0069 San Felipe gambusia ................................................................................................................................................. FWS–R2–ES–2017–0024 Supporting information used to specified under FOR FURTHER under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION prepare these findings is available for INFORMATION CONTACT. Please submit any CONTACT. public inspection, by appointment, new information, materials, comments, during normal business hours, by or questions concerning these findings FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: contacting the appropriate person, as to the appropriate person, as specified Species Contact information 14 Nevada springsnails .................. For bifid duct pyrg: Carolyn Swed, Field Supervisor, Northern Nevada (Reno) Fish and Wildlife Office, 775–861–6337 For all other species: Glen Knowles, Field Supervisor, Southern Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 702– 515–5230. Barbour’s map turtle ....................... Catherine Phillips, Field Supervisor, Panama City Ecological Services Field Office, 850–769–0552. Bicknell’s thrush .............................. Krishna Gifford, Listing Coordinator, Region 5 Regional Office, 413–253–8619. Big Blue Springs cave crayfish ....... Catherine Phillips, Field Supervisor, Panama City Ecological Services Field Office, 850–769–0552. Black-backed woodpeckers ............ Oregon Cascades—California population: Jenn Norris, Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Of- fice, 916–414–6600 Black Hills population: Scott Larson, Field Supervisor, South Dakota Ecological Services Office, 605–224– 8693. Boreal toad ...................................... Drue DeBerry, Field Supervisor, Colorado and Nebraska Field Office, 303–236–4774. Fisher .............................................. Jodi Bush, Field Supervisor, Montana Ecological Services Field Office, 406–449–5225, ext. 205. Florida Keys mole skink .................. Roxanna Hinzman, Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Field Office, 772–469–4309. Great Sand Dunes tiger beetle ....... Drue DeBerry, Field Supervisor, Colorado and Nebraska Field Office, 303–236–4774. Kirtland’s snake ............................... Dan Everson, Field Supervisor, Ohio Ecological Services Field Office, 614–416–8993. Pacific walrus .................................. Patrick Lemons, Chief Marine Mammals Management, Region 7, 907–786–3668. San Felipe gambusia ...................... Adam Zerrenner, Field Supervisor, Austin Ecological Services Field Office, 512–490–0057, ext. 248. If you use a telecommunications and Plants, we are required to make a must make a finding that the petitioned device for the deaf (TDD), please call the finding whether or not the petitioned action is: (1) Not warranted; (2) Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339. action is warranted (‘‘12-month warranted; or (3) warranted but SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: finding’’), unless we determined that the precluded. ‘‘Warranted but precluded’’ petition did not contain substantial means that (a) the immediate proposal Background scientific or commercial information of a regulation implementing the Within 12 months after receiving any indicating that the petitioned action petitioned action is precluded by other petition to revise the Federal Lists of may be warranted (section 4(b)(3)(B) of pending proposals to determine whether Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)). We species are endangered or threatened VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:42 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05OCP2.SGM 05OCP2 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 46619 species, and (b) expeditious progress is species-specific assessment forms found (Pyrgulopsis hubbsi), Pahranagat being made to add qualified species to on http://www.regulations.gov under the Pebblesnail (Pyrgulopsis merriami), the Federal Lists of Endangered and appropriate docket number (see White River Valley Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) ADDRESSES above). sathos), Butterfield Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis and to remove from the Lists species for In considering what stressors under lata), Hardy Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis marcida), which the protections of the Act are no the Act’s five factors might indicate that Flag Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis breviloba), Lake longer necessary. Section 4(b)(3)(C) of the species may meet the definition of Valley Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis sublata), Bifid the Act requires that we treat a petition a threatened or endangered species, we Duct Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis peculiaris). for which the requested action is found must look beyond the mere exposure of Previous Federal Actions to be warranted but precluded as though the species to the stressor to determine resubmitted on the date of such finding, whether the species responds to the On February 17, 2009, we received a that is, requiring that a subsequent stressor in a way that causes actual petition from the Center for Biological finding be made within 12 months of impacts to the species. If there is Diversity (the Center), the Freshwater that date. We must publish these 12- exposure to a stressor, but no response, Mollusk Conservation Society, Dr. James month findings in the Federal Register. or only a positive response, that stressor Deacon, and Don Duff requesting that 42 does not cause a species to meet the species of Great Basin springsnails from Summary of Information Pertaining to definition of a threatened or endangered Nevada, Utah, and California be listed the Five Factors species. If there is exposure and the as endangered or threatened species Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) species responds negatively, the stressor under the Act. Three of those and the implementing regulations at may be significant. In that case, we springsnail species were addressed in part 424 of title 50 of the Code of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2005 Wildlife Action Plan: Terrestrial Nongame Birds, Mammals, and Reptiles
    APPENDIX D IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIES OF CONSERVATION PRIORITY: DETAILED METHODS AND APPROACH 2005 Wildlife Action Plan: Terrestrial Nongame Birds, Mammals, and Reptiles Methods The Species of Conservation Priority identification process began in July, 2002. After initially gathering input from partner land management agency personnel at the field level, a Species Priority Matrix was developed using standard species conservation prioritization methodology (Natural Heritage Scorecard; Panjabi et al. 2001). Nevada Natural Heritage Program Species Scorecard scores were incorporated into the Species Priority Matrix. NDOW Wildlife Diversity biologists were subsequently asked to score all species of nongame birds, mammals, and reptiles using the Species Priority Matrix. The Species Priority Matrix contained the following scoring categories. 1. Endangered, Threatened, or Candidate Species Species with Endangered, Threatened, or Candidate Species status under either federal or state law were given 1 point. Total points possible in this category was 1 – multiple points for having both federal and state status were not given because state statutes are designed to generally reflect federal status. 2. Nevada Natural Heritage Program Score – Inverted Each species was given the inverted score of the Nevada Natural Heritage Program State Rank score; that is, NNHP scores run from 1 (highest risk) to 5 (lowest risk), so it was necessary to invert the score in order for “highest risk” to have the greatest arithmetic weight in the matrix. The conversion scale is illustrated in the following table. NNHP State Rank NV Species Priority Matrix Score 5 1 4 2 3 3 2 4 1 5 3. Threat The biologists were asked to assign scores to each species representing their perception of the degree of threat facing the species.
    [Show full text]
  • LUCY (2014) Risk Society and Global Connectivity OUTLINE
    LUCY (2014) Risk Society and Global Connectivity OUTLINE A. Introduction (1): Director Luc Besson & Film Genre (2): Risk Society B. Discussion Questions C. Analysis (1) Lucy: Characters (2) Lucy’s Changes (3) Lucy vs. the Scientists and Gangsters: Their Theories & Messages (4) Image Presentation: Cell Fusion and Nebulous Cloud vs. Chaos (5) “fabricated uncertainties” a) Taipei vs. Paris b) Jang & gangsters LUC BESSON • Cinema du look* • The Big Blue • Know for his action films such as • Nikita (1990); Léon: The Professional (1994); sci-fi action film The Fifth Element (1997) • Violence aestheticized and “embodied” rather than verbalized • Lucy: different because of its narration Image source: Wikipedia LUCY, DR. STRANGELOVE & GLOBAL GANG • It is said that we use only 10% of our brain • Dr. Strangelove & Nootropic drug • The drugs we use (True Science of Lucy 4:45) • Lucy brain expands after it reaches 20%, with obstacles falling “like domino”; she is “colonizing [her] brain” • When she reaches 40%, her body starts to disintegrate. • Another example: disease-free designer baby (ref) • Gangsters: The far reaches of the gang and their drug (C.P.H.4): for “kids in Europe,” Berlin, Paris, Rome, and another city (Lucy is supposed to go to). RISK • Anthony Giddens on Reflexive Modernity • two disembedding mechanisms – symbolic tokens and expert systems, both expanding and impersonal, and thus involving trust and risk. • Risk: anticipated danger; sometimes institutionalized (e.g. insurance policy; alternative plan for an activity); • different from danger, because danger is a threat to desired outcome, while one who risks courts danger • Security: balance of trust and acceptable risk • Urlich Beck on Radicalized Modernity • Risk: anticipated catastrophe or fabricated*(1) uncertainties (unpredictable, unmanageable) • “What signifies the risk society are manufactured uncertainties which tend to be intangible to our senses.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Dionda Diaboli), 6 with Implications for Its Conservation…………………………………
    ECOLOGICAL PROFILES FOR SELECTED STREAM-DWELLING TEXAS FRESHWATER FISHES IV A Final Report To The Texas Water Development Board Prepared by: Robert J. Edwards Department of Biology University of Texas-Pan American Edinburg, TX 78541 TWDB Contract Number: 95-483-107 30 August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ………………………………………….…………………….. 2 Introduction 3 Scientific Publications Resulting From This TWDB Contract………...………. 3 Discovery of a New Population of Devils River Minnow (Dionda diaboli), 6 With Implications for its Conservation…………………………………. Acknowledgements………………………………………………………..………. 14 Literature Cited……………….………………………………………….……….. 14 2 Introduction A major goal of the Water Development Board's mission are its research, monitoring, and assessment programs designed to minimize the effects of water development projects on the affected native aquatic fauna and to maintain the quality and availability of instream habitats for the use of dependent aquatic resources. The instream flows necessary for the successful survival, growth and reproduction of affected aquatic life are a major concern. Unfortunately, instream flow data with respect to the ecological requirements of Texas riverine fishes are largely unknown. While some information can be found in the published literature, a substantial but unknown quantity of information is also present in various agencies and research museums around the state. In order to minimize the disruptions to the native fauna, quantitative and qualitative information concerning life histories, survival,
    [Show full text]
  • Species Selection Process
    FINAL Appendix J to S Volume 3, Book 2 JULY 2008 COYOTE SPRINGS INVESTMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL VOLUME 3 Coyote Springs Investment Planned Development Project Appendix J to S July 2008 Prepared EIS for: LEAD AGENCY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, NV COOPERATING AGENCIES U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. George, UT U.S. Bureau of Land Management Ely, NV Prepared MSHCP for: Coyote Springs Investment LLC 6600 North Wingfield Parkway Sparks, NV 89496 Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200 Concord, CA 94520 Huffman-Broadway Group 828 Mission Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Resource Concepts, Inc. 340 North Minnesota Street Carson City, NV 89703 PROJECT NO. 3132201 COYOTE SPRINGS INVESTMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Appendix J to S ENTRIX, Inc. Huffman-Broadway Group Resource Concepts, Inc. 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200 828 Mission Avenue 340 North Minnesota Street Concord, CA 94520 San Rafael, CA 94901 Carson City, NV 89703 Phone 925.935.9920 Fax 925.935.5368 Phone 415.925.2000 Fax 415.925.2006 Phone 775.883.1600 Fax 775.883.1656 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix J Mitigation Plan, The Coyote Springs Development Project, Lincoln County, Nevada Appendix K Summary of Nevada Water Law and its Administration Appendix L Alternate Sites and Scenarios Appendix M Section 106 and Tribal Consultation Documents Appendix N Fiscal Impact Analysis Appendix O Executive Summary of Master Traffic Study for Clark County Development Appendix P Applicant for Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Application, Coyote Springs Project, Lincoln County, Nevada Appendix Q Response to Comments on the Draft EIS Appendix R Agreement for Settlement of all Claims to Groundwater in the Coyote Spring Basin Appendix S Species Selection Process JULY 2008 FINAL i APPENDIX S Species Selection Process Table of Contents Appendix S: Species Selection Process ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish (Procambarus Horsti) Version 1.1
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish (Procambarus horsti) Version 1.1 Type locality for Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish, Big Blue Spring, FL. (credit: Ryan Means, Florida Geological Survey) May 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish SSA Report Page ii May 2017 This document was prepared by Peter Maholland (USFWS – Athens, GA Field Office) with assistance from Dr. Sean Blomquist (USFWS – Panama City, FL Field Office) and Patricia Kelly (USFWS – Panama City, FL Field Office). Valuable peer reviews of a draft of this document were provided by Chester Figiel (USFWS – Warm Springs Fish Technology Center), Chris Skelton (Georgia College State University), and David Cook (Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission). We appreciate the time and effort of those dedicated to learning and implementing the SSA Framework, which resulted in a more robust assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish (Procambarus horsti). Version 1.1. May, 2017. Atlanta, GA. Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish SSA Report Page iii May 2017 Species Status Assessment Report For Big Blue Springs Cave Crayfish (Procambarus horsti) Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the Big Blue Springs cave crayfish (Procambarus horsti), documenting the species’ historical condition and providing estimates of current and future condition under a range of different scenarios. The Big Blue Springs cave crayfish is a hypogean species of crayfish endemic to several freshwater spring and sink caves within the panhandle of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Distribution and Abundance of Crayfishes in Two Florida Spring-Fed Rivers
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2016 Habitat distribution and abundance of crayfishes in two Florida spring-fed rivers Tiffani Manteuffel University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Manteuffel, Tiffani, "Habitat distribution and abundance of crayfishes in two Florida spring-fed rivers" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5230. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5230 HABITAT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF CRAYFISHES IN TWO FLORIDA SPRING-FED RIVERS by TIFFANI MANTEUFFEL B.S. Florida State University, 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2016 Major Professor: C. Ross Hinkle © 2016 Tiffani Manteuffel ii ABSTRACT Crayfish are an economically and ecologically important invertebrate, however, research on crayfish in native habitats is patchy at best, including in Florida, even though the Southeastern U.S. is one of the most speciose areas globally. This study investigated patterns of abundance and habitat distribution of two crayfishes (Procambarus paeninsulanus and P. fallax) in two Florida spring-fed rivers (Wakulla River and Silver River, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Morphometric Evidence for the Widespread Introduction Of
    BioInvasions Records (2017) Volume 6, Issue 3: 281–289 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.3.14 © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Research Article Molecular and morphometric evidence for the widespread introduction of Western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard, 1853) into freshwaters of mainland China Jiancao Gao1, Xu Ouyang1, Bojian Chen1, Jonas Jourdan2 and Martin Plath1,* 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, P.R. China 2Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 6 March 2017 / Accepted: 9 July 2017 / Published online: 31 July 2017 Handling editor: Marion Y.L. Wong Abstract Two North American species of mosquitofish, the Western (Gambusia affinis Baird and Girard, 1853) and Eastern mosquitofish (G. holbrooki Girard, 1859), rank amongst the most invasive freshwater fishes worldwide. While the existing literature suggests that G. affinis was introduced to mainland China, empirical evidence supporting this assumption was limited, and the possibility remained that both species were introduced during campaigns attempting to reduce vectors of malaria and dengue fever. We used combined molecular information (based on phylogenetic analyses of sequence variation of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene) and morphometric data (dorsal and anal fin ray counts) to confirm the presence
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources and Management
    Vermilion flycatcher The upper Muddy River is considered one of the Mojave’s most important Common buckeye on sunflower areas of biodiversity and regionally Coyote (Canis latrans) Damselfly (Enallagma sp.) (Junonia coenia on Helianthus annuus) important ecological but threatened riparian landscapes (Provencher et al. 2005). Not only does the Warm Springs Natural Area encompass the majority of Muddy River tributaries it is also the largest single tract of land in the upper Muddy River set aside for the benefit of native species in perpetuity. The prominence of water in an otherwise barren Mojave landscape provides an oasis for regional wildlife. A high bird diversity is attributed to an abundance of riparian and floodplain trees and shrubs. Contributions to plant diversity come from the Mojave Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon) Desertsnow (Linanthus demissus) Lobe-leaved Phacelia (Phacelia crenulata) Cryptantha (Cryptantha sp.) vegetation that occur on the toe slopes of the Arrow Canyon Range from the west and the plant species occupying the floodplain where they are supported by a high water table. Several marshes and wet meadows add to the diversity of plants and animals. The thermal springs and tributaries host an abundance of aquatic species, many of which are endemic. The WSNA provides a haven for the abundant wildlife that resides permanently or seasonally and provides a significant level of protection for imperiled species. Tarantula (Aphonopelma spp.) Beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris) Pacific tree frog (Pseudacris regilla)
    [Show full text]
  • Current Tracking List
    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
    [Show full text]
  • Luc Besson B.1959 Le Grand Bleu 1988
    Cinéma du Look Spring 2021 Luc Besson b.1959 Le Grand Bleu 1988 The Big Blue: Film From Time Out: https://www.timeout.com/movies/the-big-blue Time Out says The action centres on the rivalry between free-divers Barr and Reno - they dive deep without an aqualung - which begins when they are little boys. The first time you see someone plunging into alien blackness is exciting, but the novelty soon wears off. The first half-hour is the best part of the movie. Going through her usual kooky routine, Arquette plays a New York insurance agent who encounters Barr in Peru, and is captivated by his wide- eyed innocence (which others might describe as bovine stupidity). Her sole purpose seems to be to reassure the audience that there is nothing funny going on between best buddies Barr, who talks to dolphins, and Reno, a macho mother's boy (a performance of much comic credibility). The ending is the worst part of the movie: Barr rejects the pregnant Arquette in favour of going under one last time to become a dolphin-man. Such bathos reeks of cod-Camus. What lies in between is a series of CinemaScopic swathes of blue seas and white cliffs. Besson's film is exactly like his hero: very pretty but very silly. Details Release details Rated: 15 Duration: 119 mins Cast and crew Director: Luc Besson Screenwriter: Luc Besson, Robert Garland, Marilyn Goldin, Jacques Mayol, Marc Perrier Cast: Rosanna Arquette, Jean-Marc Barr, Jean Reno, Paul Shenar, Sergio Castellitto, Jean Bouise, Griffin Dunne Luc Besson Filmography as Director Thirty years ago, Le Grand Bleu (The Big Blue) shook the Croisette Article sourced from Festival de Cannes: https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/72- editions/retrospective/2018/actualites/articles/thirty-years-ago-le-grand-bleu-the-big-blue-shook-the-croisette# In 1988, the Festival de Cannes opened to Le Grand Bleu (The Big Blue) by the young Luc Besson.
    [Show full text]