House Letter Supporting the Storing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Half of Americans Approve of the Job President Biden Is Doing, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Most Say Conspiracy Theories in the U.S
Tim Malloy, Polling Analyst (203) 645-8043 Doug Schwartz, Associate Vice President and Director (203) 582-5294 FOR RELEASE: FEBRUARY 17, 2021 HALF OF AMERICANS APPROVE OF THE JOB PRESIDENT BIDEN IS DOING, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; MOST SAY CONSPIRACY THEORIES IN THE U.S. ARE OUT OF CONTROL Four weeks after being sworn into office, President Joe Biden receives a positive job approval rating as Americans approve 50 – 38 percent, with 13 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University national poll of 1,056 adults released today. This is little changed from February 3rd when Americans approved 49 – 36 percent, with 16 percent not offering an opinion. There are sharp partisan divides with Democrats approving 91 – 2 percent and independents approving 50 – 34 percent, while Republicans disapprove 82 – 11 percent. When only considering registered voters, Biden’s job approval is 52 – 38 percent. It is nearly the inverse of former President Trump’s negative 38 – 55 percent job approval rating at roughly the same period during his presidency in a February 22, 2017 poll. “One month in, these are solid, but not particularly dazzling approval numbers for the new president. There may be some solace in the knowledge that his predecessor spent four years in office without getting very close to 50 percent,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy. Americans approve 58 – 32 percent of the way Biden is handling the response to the coronavirus. On his handling of the economy, they approve 48 – 39 percent. When it comes to the Biden administration’s handling of the reopening of schools, the public is mixed with 42 percent approving, 38 percent disapproving, and 20 percent not offering an opinion. -
Jewish Historical Studies Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England
Jewish Historical Studies Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society of England Editorial: Introduction: Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses Michael Berkowitz1,* How to cite: Berkowitz, M. ‘Introduction: Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses’. Jewish Historical Studies, 2021, 52(1), pp. xi-xix. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001. Published: 03 June 2021 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard editorial peer review. Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001 Open Access: Jewish Historical Studies is a peer-reviewed open access journal. *Correspondence: [email protected] 1UCL, UK https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.jhs.2021v52.001 introduction Setbacks and shocks to the system: adjustments and particularly painful losses The previous issue of Transactions, volume 51, largely comprised articles originating in a London conference about the Kindertransport (January 2019) – the migration to Britain of nearly ten thousand (mostly) Jewish children, in the wake of “the Night of the Broken Glass” in Nazi Germany, November 1938, to the outbreak of the Second World War. In February 2019, the colleagues who initiated that conference, Lesley Urbach and Jennifer Craig-Norton of Southampton University, along with Susan Cohen, approached me with the idea of hosting a related meeting on the history of internment. -
Congressional Affairs Programming at a Glance 2016
Congressional Affairs Programming At A Glance 2016 - 2020 Congressional Delegations Congress-Bundestag Forum 2020 February 15-20, 2020 Elmau and Munich, Germany The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) and the Robert Bosch Stiftung Foundation (Bosch) hosted the 17th Annual Congress-Bundestag Forum. A bipartisan delegation of members of the U.S. House of Representatives met with members of the German Bundestag for a series of discussions on areas of mutual concern, such as: Asia in the transatlantic space, challenges to the West, European reunification after the end of communism, social cohesion, energy issues, and workforce development. Participants of the Congress-Bundestag Forum 2020 included Representatives Rob Bishop (R-UT), Bill Flores (R-TX), Mark Green (R-TN), Robin Kelly (D-IL), Brenda Lawrence (D-MI), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Debra Lesko (R-AZ), C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), Eric Swalwell (D- CA), Mike Turner (R-OH), as well as fifteen members of the German Bundestag. Transatlantic Technology Congressional Delegation 2019 November 3-8, 2019 Berlin, Germany and Brussels, Belgium GMF held, with Software.org, The Transatlantic Technology Congressional Delegation (TTCD), held in Brussels, Belgium and Berlin, Germany, enabled members of Congress to engage directly with stakeholders on topics relating to the transatlantic digital space. TTCD 2019 covered issues such as data protection, data ownership, cybersecurity, workforce development, digital trade, and digital entrepreneurship, among other issues. Participants of TTCD 2019 included Representatives Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Charlie Crist (D-FL), Glen Grothman (R-WI), James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Greg Walden (D-OR), and four senior congressional staffers. -
Congressional Report Card
Congressional Report Card NOTE FROM BRIAN DIXON Senior Vice President for Media POPULATION CONNECTION and Government Relations ACTION FUND 2120 L St NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20037 ou’ll notice that this year’s (202) 332–2200 Y Congressional Report Card (800) 767–1956 has a new format. We’ve grouped [email protected] legislators together based on their popconnectaction.org scores. In recent years, it became twitter.com/popconnect apparent that nearly everyone in facebook.com/popconnectaction Congress had either a 100 percent instagram.com/popconnectaction record, or a zero. That’s what you’ll popconnectaction.org/116thCongress see here, with a tiny number of U.S. Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121 exceptions in each house. Calling this number will allow you to We’ve also included information connect directly to the offices of your about some of the candidates senators and representative. that we’ve endorsed in this COVER CARTOON year’s election. It’s a small sample of the truly impressive people we’re Nick Anderson editorial cartoon used with supporting. You can find the entire list at popconnectaction.org/2020- the permission of Nick Anderson, the endorsements. Washington Post Writers Group, and the Cartoonist Group. All rights reserved. One of the candidates you’ll read about is Joe Biden, whom we endorsed prior to his naming Sen. Kamala Harris his running mate. They say that BOARD OF DIRECTORS the first important decision a president makes is choosing a vice president, Donna Crane (Secretary) and in his choice of Sen. Harris, Joe Biden struck gold. Carol Ann Kell (Treasurer) Robert K. -
Representative Sam Graves24 63
169 61 275 218 73 136 29 67 136 59 136 136 136 35 Representative Sam Graves24 63 65 116th United States Congress 75 29 71 24 Missouri's 6TH Congressional District 169 172 36 35 36 72 The 8 federally-funded73 health36 center organizations with a presence in36 Missouri's 6th Congressional61 72 District leverage $35,140,102 in federal investments to serve 156,755 patients. 159 69 29 24 63 ¤£ 75 ¤£ 35 ¤£ Iowa ¤£ 54 67 24 Atchison Putnam 24 ¤£ County Worth County ¤£ Harrison Schuyler §¨¦ County County ¤£ !( County Scotland !( ¤£ ¤£ 24 !( County Clark ¤£70 59 Nebraska Mercer County 61 40 ¤£ ¤£ Nodaway §¨¦ County Sullivan ¤£ 70 435 ¤£ County 70 County 470Gentry Adair !( Lewis ¤£ !( County70 !( County Holt!( 69 County Grundy !( 70 ¤£ 50 Knox 335 County 71 County 65 County Illinois 56 Andrew !( 54 270 §¨¦ ¤£ County Linn ¤£ DeKalb Daviess County !( ¤£ County County §¨¦ ¤£ St. Joseph Macon Shelby County !(!( §¨¦ !( County Marion ¤£ !(!( ¤£ Livingston ¤£ £ County £ §¨¦ !( !( County !( !( ¤ ¤!(!(§¨¦ Buchanan Caldwell Kansas County !( County !( Ralls ¤£ !( County ¤£ Clinton Chariton County Carroll County Clay §¨¦ County ¤£ !( Monroe County !( ¤£ ¤£ §¨¦ !( County ¤£ ¤£ Leavenworth Platte Liberty ¤£ Pike !( County County ¤£ !( !( Audrain !( County ¤£ !( §¨¦ Topeka ¤£ ¤£ ¤£ Lenexa !( §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ Alton 0 10 20 40 Lawrence §¨¦ §¨¦ Columbia ¤£ ¤£ Missouri §¨¦ St. Charles §¨¦ Olathe ¤£ ¤£Airbus,USGS,NGA,NASA,CGIAR,NCEAS,NLS,OS,NMA,Geodatastyrelsen,GSA,GSIMiles and the GIS- User ¤£ Community ¤£ St. Peters §¨¦ Federally-funded site Major Highways County Boundaries (each color represents one organization) NUMBER OF DELIVERY SITES IN Highways City or Town CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Major Roads 41 116th Congressional District Boundaries Notes | Delivery sites represent locations of organizations funded by the federal Health Center Program. Some locations may overlap due to scale or may otherwise not be visible when mapped. -
STANDING COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Agriculture
STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE [Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface] [Room numbers beginning with H are in the Capitol, with CHOB in the Cannon House Office Building, with LHOB in the Longworth House Office Building, with RHOB in the Rayburn House Office Building, with H1 in O’Neill House Office Building, and with H2 in the Ford House Office Building] Agriculture 1301 Longworth House Office Building, phone 225–2171, fax 225–8510 http://agriculture.house.gov meets first Wednesday of each month Collin C. Peterson, of Minnesota, Chair Tim Holden, of Pennsylvania. Bob Goodlatte, of Virginia. Mike McIntyre, of North Carolina. Terry Everett, of Alabama. Bob Etheridge, of North Carolina. Frank D. Lucas, of Oklahoma. Leonard L. Boswell, of Iowa. Jerry Moran, of Kansas. Joe Baca, of California. Robin Hayes, of North Carolina. Dennis A. Cardoza, of California. Timothy V. Johnson, of Illinois. David Scott, of Georgia. Sam Graves, of Missouri. Jim Marshall, of Georgia. Jo Bonner, of Alabama. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, of South Dakota. Mike Rogers, of Alabama. Henry Cuellar, of Texas. Steve King, of Iowa. Jim Costa, of California. Marilyn N. Musgrave, of Colorado. John T. Salazar, of Colorado. Randy Neugebauer, of Texas. Brad Ellsworth, of Indiana. Charles W. Boustany, Jr., of Louisiana. Nancy E. Boyda, of Kansas. John R. ‘‘Randy’’ Kuhl, Jr., of New York. Zachary T. Space, of Ohio. Virginia Foxx, of North Carolina. Timothy J. Walz, of Minnesota. K. Michael Conaway, of Texas. Kirsten E. Gillibrand, of New York. Jeff Fortenberry, of Nebraska. Steve Kagen, of Wisconsin. Jean Schmidt, of Ohio. -
Big Business and Conservative Groups Helped Bolster the Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During the Second Fundraising Quarter of 2021
Big Business And Conservative Groups Helped Bolster The Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During The Second Fundraising Quarter Of 2021 Executive Summary During the 2nd Quarter Of 2021, 25 major PACs tied to corporations, right wing Members of Congress and industry trade associations gave over $1.5 million to members of the Congressional Sedition Caucus, the 147 lawmakers who voted to object to certifying the 2020 presidential election. This includes: • $140,000 Given By The American Crystal Sugar Company PAC To Members Of The Caucus. • $120,000 Given By Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s Majority Committee PAC To Members Of The Caucus • $41,000 Given By The Space Exploration Technologies Corp. PAC – the PAC affiliated with Elon Musk’s SpaceX company. Also among the top PACs are Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and the National Association of Realtors. Duke Energy and Boeing are also on this list despite these entity’s public declarations in January aimed at their customers and shareholders that were pausing all donations for a period of time, including those to members that voted against certifying the election. The leaders, companies and trade groups associated with these PACs should have to answer for their support of lawmakers whose votes that fueled the violence and sedition we saw on January 6. The Sedition Caucus Includes The 147 Lawmakers Who Voted To Object To Certifying The 2020 Presidential Election, Including 8 Senators And 139 Representatives. [The New York Times, 01/07/21] July 2021: Top 25 PACs That Contributed To The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million The Top 25 PACs That Contributed To Members Of The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million During The Second Quarter Of 2021. -
Thank You Guide
Great American Outdoors Act: Thank You Guide Phone District 1 Representative Suzan DelBene 202-225-6311 District 2 Representative Rick Larsen 202-225-2605 District 3 Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler 202-225-3536 District 5 Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers 202-225-2006 District 6 Representative Derek C. Kilmer 202-225-5916 District 7 Representative Pramila Jayapal 202-225-3106 District 8 Representative Kim Schrier 202-225-7761 District 9 Representative Adam Smith 202-225-8901 District 10 Representative Denny Heck 202-225-9740 Senator Maria Cantwell 202-224-3441 Senator Patty Murray 202-224-2621 Email to Co-Sponsors District 1 Suzan DelBene - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 2 Rick Larsen - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 6 Derek C. Kilmer - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 7 Pramila Jayapal - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 8 Kim Schrier - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 9 Adam Smith - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) District 10 Denny Heck - [email protected] (cc: [email protected]) Senator Maria Cantwell - [email protected] Senator Patty Murray - [email protected] Dear Representative / Senator _____ and [ staff first name ] , My name is _______ and I am a constituent of Washington's [#] Congressional District, as well as a representative of [Organization]. I am reaching out to give a huge thank you for your co-sponsorship and vote in support of the Great American Outdoors Act. -
Representatives Allred, Granger, Veasey Host Texas Ceremony, Announce Fort Worth ISD Initiative
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Derek M. Doyle May 7, 2019 [email protected] (301) 676-3882 Representatives Allred, Granger, Veasey Host Texas Ceremony, Announce Fort Worth ISD Initiative Dallas, TX — On Saturday, May 4, 2019, Members of the Texas congressional delegation hosted a statewide Congressional Award ceremony and introduced a new initiative between Congress' award program for youth and the Fort Worth Independent School District. Texas Congressional Awardees pose for a group photo outside of the Dallas Museum of Art with U.S. Representatives Colin Allred (TX-32), Kay Granger (TX-12), and Marc Veasey (TX-33). The Dallas Museum of Art served as the host venue, welcoming awardees and their guests to a reception and award ceremony. The event was made possible by the generosity of partners like American Airlines, G2 Secure Staff, Lockheed Martin, Magdaleno Leadership Institute, and Mr. Jorge Baldor. In addition to honoring youth recipients for personal goal-setting and community service, the event served as a launch for The Congressional Award's partnership with the Fort Worth Independent School District. The two organizations unveiled their plan to equip North Texas teens with tangible skills and resources necessary to bridge the gap between classroom success and career preparation. Read more about the FWISD partnership here. “Over four decades, The Congressional Award program has displayed an unparalleled ability to empower young adults to prepare for life outside the classroom,” said Congressman Marc Veasey (TX-33). “Regardless -
Congress of the United States
Congress of the United States Washington, DC 20510 June 16, 2020 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Dear Commissioners: On behalf of our constituents, we write to thank you for the Federal Communications Commission’s (Commission’s) efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The work the Commission has done, including the Keep Americans Connected pledge and the COVID-19 Telehealth Program, are important steps to address the need for connectivity as people are now required to learn, work, and access healthcare remotely. In addition to these efforts, we urge you to continue the important, ongoing work to close the digital divide through all means available, including by finalizing rules to enable the nationwide use of television white spaces (TVWS). The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated the consequences of the remaining digital divide: many Americans in urban, suburban, and rural areas still lack access to a reliable internet connection when they need it most. Even before the pandemic broadband access challenges have put many of our constituents at a disadvantage for education, work, and healthcare. Stay-at-home orders and enforced social distancing intensify both the problems they face and the need for cost- effective broadband delivery models. The unique characteristics of TVWS spectrum make this technology an important tool for bridging the digital divide. It allows for better coverage with signals traveling further, penetrating trees and mountains better than other spectrum bands. Under your leadership, the FCC has taken significant bipartisan steps toward enabling the nationwide deployment of TVWS, including by unanimously adopting the February 2020 notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which makes several proposals that we support. -
Employees of Northrop Grumman Political Action Committee (ENGPAC) 2017 Contributions
Employees of Northrop Grumman Political Action Committee (ENGPAC) 2017 Contributions Name Candidate Office Total ALABAMA $69,000 American Security PAC Rep. Michael Dennis Rogers (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 Byrne for Congress Rep. Bradley Roberts Byrne (R) Congressional District 01 $5,000 BYRNE PAC Rep. Bradley Roberts Byrne (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 Defend America PAC Sen. Richard Craig Shelby (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 Martha Roby for Congress Rep. Martha Roby (R) Congressional District 02 $10,000 Mike Rogers for Congress Rep. Michael Dennis Rogers (R) Congressional District 03 $6,500 MoBrooksForCongress.Com Rep. Morris Jackson Brooks, Jr. (R) Congressional District 05 $5,000 Reaching for a Brighter America PAC Rep. Robert Brown Aderholt (R) Leadership PAC $2,500 Robert Aderholt for Congress Rep. Robert Brown Aderholt (R) Congressional District 04 $7,500 Strange for Senate Sen. Luther Strange (R) United States Senate $15,000 Terri Sewell for Congress Rep. Terri Andrea Sewell (D) Congressional District 07 $2,500 ALASKA $14,000 Sullivan For US Senate Sen. Daniel Scott Sullivan (R) United States Senate $5,000 Denali Leadership PAC Sen. Lisa Ann Murkowski (R) Leadership PAC $5,000 True North PAC Sen. Daniel Scott Sullivan (R) Leadership PAC $4,000 ARIZONA $29,000 Committee To Re-Elect Trent Franks To Congress Rep. Trent Franks (R) Congressional District 08 $4,500 Country First Political Action Committee Inc. Sen. John Sidney McCain, III (R) Leadership PAC $3,500 (COUNTRY FIRST PAC) Gallego for Arizona Rep. Ruben M. Gallego (D) Congressional District 07 $5,000 McSally for Congress Rep. Martha Elizabeth McSally (R) Congressional District 02 $10,000 Sinema for Arizona Rep. -
Curbing the Cost of Partisan Opportunism in Congressional Oversight Hearings
\\jciprod01\productn\n\nyu\90-1\nyu105.txt unknown Seq: 1 30-MAR-15 11:23 FULL OF SOUND AND FURY: CURBING THE COST OF PARTISAN OPPORTUNISM IN CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT HEARINGS CRISTIAN R.C. KELLY* As Congress creates bigger and broader federal programs and administrative agen- cies, appropriates larger sums on their behalf, and delegates more of its legislative authority to their leaders, it takes on a commensurate responsibility to diligently oversee those agencies. Because time and resources available for congressional oversight are limited, a committee’s decision to conduct a formal oversight hearing implicates a substantial opportunity cost. At the same time, oversight hearings pre- sent committees with considerable opportunities for grandstanding and political gamesmanship. The voting public should therefore demand that congressional committees use oversight hearings efficiently, pursuing benefits like agency accountability, transparency, and democratic legitimacy, rather than the commit- tees’ own partisan electoral advantage. However, because congressional committees are complex political institutions and because legitimate oversight benefits can often coincide with partisan political objectives, the distinction is not always easy to dis- cern from the outside. With these nuances in mind, I argue that the outside observer can infer a committee’s underlying motivations and predict a given hearing’s likely benefits by looking for specific patterns in the way the hearing is conducted—i.e., the hearing’s “operational functions.” INTRODUCTION ................................................. 254 R I. OVERSIGHT HEARINGS IN THE MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE: BENEFITS OF USE AND COSTS OF ABUSE ............................................... 257 R A. The Modern Administrative State and the Need for Congressional Oversight ............................ 257 R B. The Potential Conversion of Oversight Activity for Partisan Advantage ................................