DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Unpublished Official Papers of William James Ashley (Ashley Papers), The British Library, London. Diaries of Arthur Christopher Benson (AB), Magdalene College, Cambridge. The Papers of Oscar Browning (OB), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. Cambridge University Archives (CUA), The University Library, Cambridge. Davies, M. (1995), King’s College Account Office, Letter to Nahid Aslanbeigui, 7 August. The Harrow School Archive, Harrow School, Harrow on the Hill. The Hewins Manuscripts (Hewins), University of Sheffield Library, Sheffield. The Papers of John Maynard Keynes (JMK), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. Diaries of John Neville Keynes (JNK), Cambridge University Library, Cambridge. King’s College Academic and Tutorial Records (KCAC), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. Macmillan Archive, Add55 199, Vol. CDXIV 1904-38, The British Library, London. Munby, A.N. (1959) ‘Professor Pigou’s Books’ in A.C. Pigou’s Personnel File, King’s College, Cambridge. The Papers of Baron Noel-Baker (NBKR), Churchill Archives Centre, Cambridge. The Papers of Arthur Cecil Pigou (ACP), Marshall Library of Economics, Cambridge. Papers Relating to Arthur Cecil Pigou (King’s), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. The Papers of Lionel Robbins (LR), British Library of Political and Economic Science, London. The Papers of Professor Joan Violet Robinson (JVR), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. The Papers of John Tresidder Sheppard (JTS), King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge. Published Accominotti, O. (2012) ‘London Merchant Banks, the Central European Panic and the Sterling Crisis of 1931’, Journal of Economic History, 72, 1–43. Ambrosi, G. M. (2003) Pigou and Cambridge Keynesians. Authenticity and Analytical Perspective in the Keynes-Classical Debate, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. An Economist [Hewins, W.A.S.] (1903) ‘The Fiscal Policy of the Empire’, The Times, June–September. Annan, N. (1979) ‘Unsavoury Insinuations in a Soviet Spy Hunt’, T he Guardian, 2 June. 274 Bibliography 275 Anstruther, I. (1983) Oscar Browning: A Biography, London: John Murray. Ashley, W.J. (1904) The Progress of the German Working Classes in the Last Quarter of a Century, London: Longmans, Green, & Co. Aslanbeigui, N. (1992a) ‘Foxwell’s Aims and Pigou’s Military Service: A Malicious Episode?’ Journal of the History of Economic Thoughtt, 14, 96–109. —— (1992b) ‘Pigou’s Inconsistencies or Keynes’s Misconceptions?’ History of Political Economy, 24, 413–33. —— (1997) ‘Rethinking Pigou’s Misogyny’, E astern Economic Journal, 23, 301–16. Aslanbeigui, N. and Medema, S. (1998) ‘Beyond the Dark Clouds: Pigou and Coase on Social Cost’, History of Political Economy, 30, 601–25. Aslanbeigui, N. and Oakes, G. (2002) ‘The Theory Arsenal: The Cambridge Circus and the Origins of the Keynesian Revolution’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24, 5–37. —— (2007) ‘The Editor as Scientific Revolutionary: Keynes, The Economic Journal, and the Pigou Affair, 1936–1938’, Journal of the History of Economic Thoughtt, 29, 15–48. —— (2009) The Provocative Joan Robinson. The Making of a Cambridge Economistt, Durham: Duke University Press. —— (2012) ‘On Pigou’s Theory of Economic Policy Analysis’, Œconomia, 2, 123–50. —— (Forthcoming) ‘The British Tariff Reform Controversy and the Genesis of the Economics of Welfare’, History of Political Economy. Atkinson, A.B. (1983) Social Justice and Public Policy, Cambridge: MIT Press. B., J. (1936) ‘H.S. Foxwell’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 99, 837–41. Backhouse, R.E. (2006) ‘Sidgwick, Marshall, and the Cambridge School of Economics’, History of Political Economy, 38, 15–44. Barber, W.J. (1991) ‘From the Economics of Welfare to the Economics of Warfare (and Back) in the Thought of A.C. Pigou’, in C.D. Goodwin (ed.) E conomics and National Security. A History of Their Interaction, Annual Supplement to Volume 23, History of Political Economy, Durham: Duke University Press, 131–42. Barkai, H. (1993) ‘Productivity Patterns, Exchange Rates, and the Gold Standard Restoration Debate of the 1920s’, History of Political Economy, 25, 1–37. Barnett, C. and Barnett, S.A. (1909) Towards Social Reform, New York: Macmillan. Bastable, C.F. et al. (1903) ‘To the Editor of the Times’, The Times, 15 August, 4. Benham, F. (1936) ‘ The Economics of Stationary States. By A.C. Pigou’, Economica, 3, 89–93. Benn, E.J.P. (1926) ‘The Teaching of Economics: Examples from Cambridge. Issues Ignored’, The Times, 17 November, reprinted in E.J.P. Benn (1927) Th e Letters of an Individualist to The Times 1921–1926, London: Ernest Benn, 135–43. Bernoulli, D. (1954) ‘Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk’, translated by Louise Sommer, Econometrica, 22, 23–36. Beveridge, W. (1909) Unemp loyment: A Problem of Industry, London: Longmans, Green & Co. —— (1930) The Past and Present of Unemployment Insurance, Sidney Ball Lecture, 7 February, London: Oxford University Press. Bharadwaj, K. (1972) ‘Marshall on Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare’, Economica, 39, 32–46. Bickerdike, C.F. (1907) ‘Protective and Preferential Import Duties by A.C. Pigou’, Economic Journal, 17, 98–102. 276 Bibliography Bleaney, M. (1987) ‘Macroeconomic Theory and the Great Depression Revisited’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 34, 105–19. Brady, M.E. (1994) ‘A Note on the Keynes–Pigou Controversy’, History of Political Economy, 26, 697–705. Brahmanand, P.R. (1959) ‘A.C. Pigou (1877–1959)’, Indian Economic Journal, 6, 466–87. Brentano, L. (1910) ‘The Doctrine of Malthus and the Increase of Population During the Last Decades’, E conomic Journal, 20, 371–93. Brodie, D. (2003) A History of British Labour Law, 1867–1945, Oxford: Hart Publishing. Brown, V. (1991) ‘On Keynes’s Inverse Relation between Real Wages and Employment: a Debate over Excess Capacity’, Review of Political Economy, 3, 439–65. Browning, O. (1910) Memories of Sixty Years at Eton Cambridge & Elsewhere, London: John Lane. Butler, B.B. (1953) ‘John and Edward Lees. Secretaries of the Irish Post Office, 1774–1831’, Dublin Historical Record, 13, 138–50. Caillard, V. (1903) ‘To the Editor of the Times’, The Times, 18 August, 6. Cain, P. (1996) ‘The Economic Philosophy of Constructive Imperialism’, in C. Navari (ed.), British Politics and the Spirit of the Age, Bodmin, Cornwall: Keele University Press, 41–65. Cairncross, A. (1993) Austin Robinson: The Life of an Economic Advisorr, London: Macmillan. Cambridge Review, (various issues), Cambridge University. Cambridge University Reporterr, (CUR, various issues), Cambridge University. Cannan, E. (1921) ‘ The Economics of Welfare. By A.C. Pigou’, Economic Journal, 31, 206–14. Cassidy, J. (2009) ‘An Economist’s Invisible hand’, The Wall Street Journal, 28 November. Chamberlain, J. (1914) Mr. Chamberlain’s Speeches, Volume III, C.W. Boyd (ed.), Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Champernowne, D.G. (1959) ‘Arthur Cecil Pigou 1877–1959’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 122, 263–5. Chapman, S.J. (1905) ‘Are Manufactures Unstable Internationally?’ Economic Journal, 15, 186–96. Clapham, J.H. (1922a) ‘The Economic Boxes’, Economic Journal, 32, 560–3. —— (1922b) ‘Of Empty Economic Boxes’, E conomic Journal, 32, 305–14. Clark, J.M. (1913) ‘ Wealth and Welfare by A.C. Pigou’, American Economic Review, 3, 623–5. Coase, R.H. (1960) ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. —— (1972) ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor’, Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 473–85. —— (1988) The Firm, The Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. —— (1994) Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Coats, A.W. (1964) ‘The Role of Authority in the Development of British Economics’, Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 85–106. Bibliography 277 —— (1968) ‘Political Economy and the Tariff Reform Campaign of 1903’, Journal of Law and Economics, 11, 181–229. —— (1972) ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor: Comment’, Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 487–95. Cole, G.D.H. (1948) A Short History of the British Working-Class Movement 1789– 1947, revised edn, London: George Allen & Unwin. Collard, D. (1981) ‘A.C. Pigou, 1877–1959’, in D.P. O’Brien and J.R. Presley (eds), Pioneers of Modern Economics, London: Macmillan, 105–39. —— (1983) ‘Pigou on Expectations and the Cycle’, Economic Journal, 93, 411–14. —— (1990) ‘Cambridge after Marshall’, in J.K. Whitaker (ed.), Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–92. —— (1996a) ‘Pigou and Future Generations: A Cambridge Tradition’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 585–97. —— (1996b) ‘Pigou and Modern Business Cycle Theory’, Economic Journal, 106, 912–24. —— (1999) ‘Introduction’, in A.C. Pigou. Collected Economic Writings, Volume 1, D. Collard (ed.), London: Macmillan, v–xlviii. —— (2011) Generations of Economists, New York: Routledge. —— (2014) ‘Pigou’s Wealth and Welfare: A Centenary Assessment’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38, 945–60. Collins, H. (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Collet, C.E. (1936) ‘Professor Foxwell and the University College’, Economic Journal, 46, 614–19. Cooter, R. and Rapport, P. (1984) ‘Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?’ Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 383–412. Cottrell, A. (1994) ‘Keynes’s Appendix to Chapter 19: A Reader’s Guide’, History of Political Economy, 26, 681–95. Court, W.H.B. (1945) ‘Problems of the British Coal Industry between the Wars’, Economic History Review, 15,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AC Pigou and the Birth of Welfare Economics
    David Campbell, Lancaster University Law School Ian Kumekawa, The First Serious Optimist: AC Pigou and the Birth of Welfare Economics, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017, pp x, 332, hbk, isbn 978-0-691-16348-2, £27.95 In 1920, the year in which his most important work, The Economics of Welfare, appeared, Arthur Cecil Pigou (1877-1959), Professor of Political Economy in the University of Cambridge (1908-43), arguably was the most influential economist in the world. Leaving aside his important service to the teaching of economics and his being what would now be called a public intellectual, Pigou made important theoretical contributions to a wide range of topics. But it is on his formulation of the economics of piecemeal intervention, and in particular of the concept of the externality as a rationale of such intervention, that his contemporary significance, and interest to the readers of this journal, rests. Economists had, of course, been concerned with social problems prior to Pigou – his predecessors in the ‘Cambridge School’ of economics, Henry Sidgwick (20) and Alfred Marshall (29), were prominent in this regard - and previously had reasoned on the basis of something like the externality – Adam Smith certainly did so. But it was Pigou who placed all this on a unified theoretical basis, which, in part because of the influence of his usage, is now known as welfare economics. The terms in which Pigou formulated the externality, of a divergence between the private and social net products of an investment, has fallen into desuetude, and not only is none of the modern terminology of welfare economics – social welfare function, social cost, market failure, public goods, indeed the externality itself – due to Pigou, but those economics were developed in ways which often treated his specific approach as obsolete (163-64, 199).
    [Show full text]
  • Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This Collection Was the Gift of Howard J
    Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This collection was the gift of Howard J. Garber to Case Western Reserve University from 1979 to 1993. Dr. Howard Garber, who donated the materials in the Howard J. Garber Manuscript Collection, is a former Clevelander and alumnus of Case Western Reserve University. Between 1979 and 1993, Dr. Garber donated over 2,000 autograph letters, documents and books to the Department of Special Collections. Dr. Garber's interest in history, particularly British royalty led to his affinity for collecting manuscripts. The collection focuses primarily on political, historical and literary figures in Great Britain and includes signatures of all the Prime Ministers and First Lords of the Treasury. Many interesting items can be found in the collection, including letters from Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Robert Browning Thomas Hardy, Queen Victoria, Prince Albert, King George III, and Virginia Woolf. Descriptions of the Garber Collection books containing autographs and tipped-in letters can be found in the online catalog. Box 1 [oversize location noted in description] Abbott, Charles (1762-1832) English Jurist. • ALS, 1 p., n.d., n.p., to ? A'Beckett, Gilbert A. (1811-1856) Comic Writer. • ALS, 3p., April 7, 1848, Mount Temple, to Morris Barnett. Abercrombie, Lascelles. (1881-1938) Poet and Literary Critic. • A.L.S., 1 p., March 5, n.y., Sheffield, to M----? & Hughes. Aberdeen, George Hamilton Gordon (1784-1860) British Prime Minister. • ALS, 1 p., June 8, 1827, n.p., to Augustous John Fischer. • ANS, 1 p., August 9, 1839, n.p., to Mr. Wright. • ALS, 1 p., January 10, 1853, London, to Cosmos Innes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodz Economics Working Papers
    L odz E conomic s W orking P apers ALFRED MARSHALL’S PUZZLES. BETWEEN ECONOMICS AS A POSITIVE SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC CHIVALRY Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska 5/2015 Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowska Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz Institute of Economics, Department of History of Economic Thought and Economic History email: [email protected] Alfred Marshall’s Puzzles. Between Economics as a Positive Science and Economic Chivalry Abstract: Alfred Marshall’s approach to economics hides a paradox. On one hand, the ‘father’ of neoclassical economics strongly favoured conducting economics as a positive science. However, the fact that Marshall was such a consistent and determined advocate of this ideal of economic research is puzzling for at least two reasons. Firstly, even a quick glance at his publications allows to notice that his texts are sated with moral teachings. What is more, in referring to the problems of economic policy he not only took into account ethical aspects, but also frequently gave pre-eminence to ethical arguments over conclusions stemming from research grounded solely on the theory of economics. The paper aims to explain the paradox and argues that the complexity of Marshall’s approach arises from his attempts to combine two approaches pointed by Amartya Sen of binding economics and ethics over the centuries: ‘the ethics-related tradition’ with ‘the engineering approach’. JEL Codes: B31, M14 Keywords: Alfred Marshall, positive economics, normative economics, ethics and economics, economic chivalry 1 Introduction Marshall’s approach to economics hides a paradox. On one hand, the ‘father’ of neoclassical economics, who usually shunned explicit statements on the methodological issues, favoured in a straightforward way conducting economics as a positive science.
    [Show full text]
  • “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition
    “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition Steven G. Medema* Version 2.3 January 2019 Forthcoming, History of Political Economy * University Distinguished Professor of Economics, University of Colorado Denver. Email: [email protected]. The author has benefitted greatly from comments on earlier drafts of this paper provided by Roger Backhouse, Nathalie Berta, Ross Emmett, Kenji Fujii, Kerry Krutilla, Alain Marciano, Norikazu Takami, participants in the CHOPE workshop at Duke University, the editor, and two anonymous referees. The financial support provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Earhart Foundation, the Institute for New Economic Thinking, and the University of Colorado Denver is gratefully acknowledged. “Exceptional and Unimportant”? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition I. Introduction Economists typically locate the origins of the theory of externalities in A.C. Pigou’s The Economics of Welfare (1920), where Pigou suggested that activities which generate uncompensated benefits or costs—e.g., pollution, lighthouses, scientific research— represent instances of market failure requiring government corrective action.1 According to this history, Pigou’s effort gave rise to an unbroken Pigovian tradition in externality theory that continues to exert a substantial presence in the literature to this day, even with the stiff criticisms of it laid down by Ronald Coase (1960) and others beginning in the 1960s.2 This paper challenges that view. It demonstrates that, in the aftermath of the publication of The Economics of Welfare, economists paid almost no attention to externalities. On the rare occasions when externalities were mentioned, it was in the context of whether a competitive equilibrium could produce an efficient allocation of resources and to note that externalities were an impediment to the attainment of the optimum.
    [Show full text]
  • École Normale Supérieure De Lyon Département D'études
    École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Département d'Études anglophones Mémoire de Master 1 Céline Autin Oscar Browning and the making of popular history: education, identity and Empire in Britain, 1878 – 1912 Sous la direction de Monsieur le Professeur Neil Davie 2015-2016 Acknowledgements I wish to thank several persons for helping me in my research: the Archivist of King’s College Library, Dr. Patricia McGuire, and the Assistant Archivist, Mr Peter Monteith, for their guidance and kind pieces of advice, as well as permission to quote from the papers of Oscar Browning; the Library staff in the Rare Books reading room of the Cambridge University Library for their support and inspiring presence. I would like to mention the organizers of the Modern Cultural History Seminars, Dr. Lawrence Klein and Dr. Peter Mandler, as well as the conveners of the interdisciplinary symposium “Books in the Making”, Dr. Kasia Body and David Winters, with the support of the Centre for Research in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (CRASSH), for their enlightening research programmes. I am also deeply grateful to Piotrek Czosnyka, whose work on the cultural and social history of toy soldiers has been decisive in the way I thought of the fashioning of childhood, and with whom I had thrilling exchanges. Grateful acknowledgement is also extended to Dr. Neil Davie for his watchful supervision and crucial suggestions. In their different ways, these persons helped to refine my ideas and brought me to a keener understanding of my subject. They also powerfully embody the academic culture of interdisciplinarity and lively intellectual exchange in which I have a lasting belief.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Economics in a Lakatos–Bourdieu Framework
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Future of Economics in a Lakatos–Bourdieu Framework. Heise, Arne University of Hamburg 2014 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/80024/ MPRA Paper No. 80024, posted 05 Jul 2017 05:42 UTC The Future of Economics in a Lakatos-Bourdieu framework Prof. Arne Heise University of Hamburg Dep. of Socioeconomics VMP 9 D-20146 Hamburg [email protected] Abstract The global financial crisis has clearly been a matter of great consternation for the busi- ness-as-usual faction of mainstream economics. Will the World Financial Crisis turn out to be that ‘experimentum crucis’ which triggered a scientific revolution? In this paper, we seek to assess the likelihood of a paradigm shift towards heterodox approaches and a more pluralist setting in economics emerging from the academic establishment in the U.S. – that is, from the dominant center of knowledge production in the economic disci- pline. This will be done by building the analysis on a combined Lakatosian framework of ‘battle of research programmes’ and a Bourdieuian framework of ‘power struggle’ within the academic field and highlighting the likelihood of two main proponents of the mainstream elite to become the promulgator of change? Keywords: Paradigm, heterodox economics, scientific revolution JEL codes: A 11, E 11, E 12 1 1. The Keynesian Revolution and Pragmatic Pluralism – A Fruitful Competition Between Theories or a Crisis in Economics? John Maynard Keynes concludes ‘The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money’ (1936: 383-84) with the following, now-famous words: „At the present moment people are unusually expectant of a more funda- mental diagnosis; more particularly ready to receive it; eager to try it out, if it should be even possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Financial Crises: How to Fund Resolution?
    1 Sebastian Schich and Byoung-Hwan Kim are Principal Administrator and Financial Markets Analyst, respectively, in the Financial Affairs Division of the OECD‘s Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. This article is part of the Committee on Financial Markets‘ (CMF) work produced in the context of its Strategic Response to the Financial Crisis. Earlier versions of the article were discussed by the CMF at its meetings in April and October 2010; the present article takes into account these discussions as well as written comments received subsequently. The article was first released in December 2010. All remaining errors are those of the authors. This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. OECD JOURNAL: FINANCIAL MARKET TRENDS – VOLUME 2010 ISSUE 2 © OECD 2010 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ―The financial sector needs to provide a fair contribution to the resolution of the recent systemic crisis, especially where financial institutions have benefitted from government support during the financial crisis‖. This basic principle was broadly supported by delegates at the CMF discussion on how to raise revenues in order to fund systemic crisis resolution. Views on how to achieve that goal differed, however. Thus, the CMF discussion was illustrative of the broader ongoing debate regarding mechanisms for enhancing financial stability, which has been taking place in international forums, including in particular the FSB and the G20. Several different types of financial-sector taxes or levies have been proposed or implemented, many of which could be interpreted as measures to fund systemic crisis resolution ex post (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Green Taxation in OECD Countries
    European Journal of Law and Economics, 15: 203–218, 2003 c 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. The Political Economy of Green Taxation in OECD Countries CRISTINA E. CIOCIRLAN [email protected] Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, USA BRUCE YANDLE [email protected] Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA; Bozeman, Montana, USA Abstract This paper addresses the role of politics in environmental policymaking in OECD countries. The public interest theory of regulation assumes that politicians pursue the public good and employ economically efficient instruments such as Pigouvian taxes to discourage polluting activities. Alternative theories of regulation, however, explain more realistically the environmental policymaking process. The theory developed in this paper argues that the goals of raising revenue and industry competitiveness overwhelm the goal of improving environmental quality when politicians set green taxes. This theory is empirically tested with a political economy model using data on OECD countries. The results suggest that policymakers do not set taxes with a specific concern for the environment, but to generate revenues. The model also demonstrates the concavity of the revenue function with respect to emissions; taxes are raised up to an optimal point beyond which raising them would discourage emissions, and thus revenues. Harmful behavior is not discouraged through the imposition of the taxes, since less healthy populations are taxed less. Emissions generated by industries that are exempted from taxation are offset by the industries that are taxed. When polluting products constitute a high share of the exported products, revenues from environmentally related taxes drop. These results help explaining the lack of environmental orientation of green taxes in the OECD countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics and Ethics of the Welfare State
    The Third Welfare Policy Seminar Economics and Ethics of the Welfare State (held on March 8, 1999, Tokyo) Review of Population and Social Policy, No. 8, 1999, 119–138. Welfare Economics and the Welfare State* Kotaro SUZUMURA** The complicated analyses which economists endeavour to carry through are not mere gymnastic. They are instruments for the bettering of human life. The misery and squalor that surround us, the injurious luxury of some wealthy families, the terrible uncertainty overshadowing many families of the poor—these are evils too plain to be ignored. By the knowledge that our science seeks it is possible that they may be restrained. Out of the darkness light! To search for it is the task, to find it perhaps the prize, which the “dismal science of Political Economy” offers to those who face its discipline. — Arthur Cecil Pigou*** 1. Introduction The time is now ripe for re-examining the concept of the welfare state with a view to searching for a common understanding on the agenda and ethical foundations of the welfare state in a contemporary society. The time is also ripe for re-orienting welfare economics with a view to renovating this discipline so that it can contribute actively to the enhancement of human well-being in general, and to the design and implementation of fully-fledged welfare state policies in particular. The necessity and urgency of such a re-examination and re- orientation seem all too clear for at least two reasons. First, ever since the publication of Amartya Sen’s epoch-making synthesis of social choice theory in 1970 and John Rawls’s monumental edifice in moral and political philosophy in 1971, the concept of well-being has been enriched substantially, liberating us from the narrow cage of utilitarian sum of individual utilities, and enabling us to accommodate such basic considerations as liberty, * Paper presented at the Third Welfare Policy Seminar on the Economics and Ethics of the Welfare State held at the United Nations University in Tokyo on March 8, 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Nobel Prize in Economics Turns 50 Allen R. Sanderson1 and John
    The Nobel Prize in Economics Turns 50 Allen R. Sanderson1 and John J. Siegfried2 Abstract The first Sveriges Riksbank Prizes in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, were awarded in 1969, 50 years ago. In this essay we provide the historical origins of this sixth “Nobel” field, background information on the recipients, their nationalities, educational backgrounds, institutional affiliations, and collaborations with their esteemed colleagues. We describe the contributions of a sample of laureates to economics and the social and political world around them. We also address – and speculate – on both some of their could-have-been contemporaries who were not chosen, as well as directions the field of economics and its practitioners are possibly headed in the years ahead, and thus where future laureates may be found. JEL Codes: A1, B3 1 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 2Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Corresponding Author: Allen Sanderson, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction: The 1895 will of Swedish scientist Alfred Nobel specified that his estate be used to create annual awards in five categories – physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and peace – to recognize individuals whose contributions have conferred “the greatest benefit on mankind.” Nobel Prizes in these five fields were first awarded in 1901.1 In 1968, Sweden’s central bank, to celebrate its 300th anniversary and also to champion its independence from the Swedish government and tout the scientific nature of its work, made a donation to the Nobel Foundation to establish a sixth Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.2 The first “economics Nobel” Prizes, selected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences were awarded in 1969 (to Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen, from Norway and the Netherlands, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of an Externality in Economic Theory and Policy
    A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF AN EXTERNALITY IN ECONOMIC THEORY AND POLICY by REBECCA LIVERNOIS B.A., University of Guelph, 2011 M.A., University of British Columbia, 2013 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Philosophy) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2019 © Rebecca Livernois, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of an Externality in Economic Theory and Policy submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements by Rebecca Livernois for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Examining Committee: Margaret Schabas, Philosophy Supervisor John Beatty, Philosophy Supervisory Committee Member Alison Wylie, Philosophy Supervisory Committee Member Matt Bedke, Philosophy University EXaminer Brian Copeland, Economics University EXaminer David Schmidtz, Philosophy External EXaminer ii ABSTRACT Economists generally understand externalities as unpriced spillover effects. The paradigmatic case is pollution because it is unpriced and affects agents external to the market choices that lead to its production. One solution to an externality is to set a tax on the unpriced activity at the value of the externality in equilibrium. The concept of an externality, however, is notoriously difficult to precisely define and there is a notable absence of consensus among economists. In this dissertation, I offer an analysis of the contemporary treatment of externalities in economic theory and arrive at the following definition: Externalities arise when unpriced activities generate untapped gains from exchange that are associated with untapped welfare gains.
    [Show full text]
  • A.C. Pigou and the 'Marshallian' Thought Style
    A.C. PIGOU AND THE ‘MARSHALLIAN’ THOUGHT STYLE A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY AND MATHEMATICS UNDERLYING CAMBRIDGE ECONOMICS Karen Lovejoy Knight PALGRAVE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought Series Editors Avi J. Cohen Department of Economics York University and University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada G.C. Harcourt School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Peter Kriesler School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Jan Toporowski Economics Department SOAS, University of London London, UK Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought publishes contri- butions by leading scholars, illuminating key events, theories and indi- viduals that have had a lasting impact on the development of modern-day economics. The topics covered include the development of economies, institutions and theories. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14585 Karen Lovejoy Knight A.C. Pigou and the ‘Marshallian’ Thought Style A Study in the Philosophy and Mathematics Underlying Cambridge Economics Karen Lovejoy Knight Independent Scholar Duncraig, WA, Australia Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ISBN 978-3-030-01017-1 ISBN 978-3-030-01018-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01018-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018959362 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]