DOCSLIB.ORG

Te Ara Tupua — Ngā Ūranga Ki Pito-One Cultural & Environmental Design Framework (CEDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Te Ara Tupua — Ngā Ūranga Ki Pito-One Cultural & Environmental Design Framework (CEDF) 22 September 2020 Te Ara Tupua — Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One Cultural & Environmental Design Framework (CEDF) FINAL (planning version) Disclaimer This report has been prepared in support of the notices of requirement and applications for resource consent for the Project made by Waka Kotahi under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 (COVID-19 Recovery Act). In particular, this report supports the assessment of the Project's effects on the environment as required by the COVID-19 Recovery Act. The requirements of the COVID-19 Recovery Act and an overall assessment of the effects of the Project on the environment are set out in the Assessment of Effects on the Environment. This report has been prepared by Isthmus Group Ltd for the benefit of Waka Kotahi - NZ Transport Agency. No liability is accepted by Isthmus Group Ltd or any employee of or sub-consultant to Isthmus Group Ltd with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. Author: Lisa Rimmer, Landscape Architect and Urban Design, Isthmus Mana Whenua Advisors: Morrie Love, Kara Dentice and the Mana Whenua Steering Group Cultural Expression Artist: Len Hetet Design and Production: Chelsea Kershaw, Kadin Hegglun, Zach Barker, James Pattullo, Tessa Macphail, Blair Brixton, Sean Burke and Lisa Rimmer Landscape Architects, Jia Ying Hew, Gabrielle Free, Jason Barnes , Scott McKerrow and Andrew Mirrams Architects, Isthmus Graphics, photographs and maps by Isthmus unless otherwise stated Cultural Expression Artwork: Len Hetet Tupua, Ngāke and Whātaitai - Cover Image Te Ara Tupua - Page Banner JOB ref: 4244 ©Isthmus Group Ltd 2020 Document record Issue Revision Author Date Draft A LR 06/03/2020 Advanced B LR 25/05/2020 Draft Final Draft C LR 20/07/2020 Final D LR 02/09/2020 Final E LR 09/09/2020 Final F LR 18/09/2020 Final G LR 22/09/2020 2 Te Ara Tupua - Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One CEDF | Waka Kotahi | September 22, 2020 Contents. 1. Overview. 5 3. Design Outcomes 61 4. Draft Masterplan & Cross Sections 135 1.1 Te Ara Tupua - The Ancient Pathway 6 3.1 Coastal & Ecological Response 62 4.1 Ngā Ūranga Interchange 136 1.2 Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One Vision 8 3.2 Cultural Landscape Response 68 4.2 Shared Path Bridge at Ngā Ūranga 138 1.3 Kaitiaki Strategy 9 3.3 Urban Landscape Response 74 4.3 Piki Wahine Point 140 1.4 Consent Design Overview 10 3.4 Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One 75 4.4 Tahataha Roa 142 1.5 Design Themes 12 3.4.1 A Coastal Experience 76 4.5 Paroro-rangi Point 144 1.6 Schematic Draft Masterplan 14 3.4.2 Material Palette 78 4.6 Paroro Bay 146 1.7 Typical Cross Sections 16 3.4.3 Technical Design Requirements 82 4.7 Karanga Point 148 1.8 Background Documents 20 3.4.4 Maintenance 83 4.8 Te Ana Bay 150 1.9 Waka Kotahi Landscape Design Principles 22 3.4.5 New Coastal Edge 84 4.9 Horokiwi 152 1.10 Waka Kotahi Urban Design Principles 22 3.4.6 The Path 86 4.10 Korokoro 154 1.11 Kaitiaki Strategy Design Principles 22 3.4.7 Ūranga 88 4.11 Pito-One 156 1.12 Consultation & Review 23 3.4.8 Gateways 90 4.12 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 1 West 158 3.5 Shared Path Bridge at Ngā Ūranga 92 4.13 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 1 East 160 2. Context 25 3.6 Paving, Seating, & Landscape Features 96 4.14 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 2 West 162 3.7 Planting 100 4.15 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 2 East 164 2.1 A Dynamic Coastal Landscape 26 3.8 Streams 102 4.16 Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One Cross Sections 166 2.2 A Layered Cultural Landscape 38 3.9 Stormwater 104 4.17 Honiana Te Puni Reserve Cross Sections 186 2.3 A Connected Urban Landscape 43 3.10 Wayfinding and Interpretation 105 3.11 Public Safety & Security 107 5. Illustrative Views 193 3.12 Construction 112 5.1 Shared Path Bridge at Ngā Ūranga 194 3.13 Honiana Te Puni Reserve 114 5.2 Piki Wahine Point 198 3.14 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 1 118 5.3 Tahataha roa 200 3.15 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Buildings (Stage 1) 122 5.4 Paroro-rangi Point 202 3.16 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Stage 2 126 5.5 Karanga Point 204 3.17 Honiana Te Puni Reserve - Buildings (Stage 2) 130 5.6 Te Ana Bay 206 5.7 Horokiwi 208 5.8 Karanga Point Ecological Screen 210 5.9 Ecological Screens 212 5.10 Honiana Te Puni Reserve 214 Te Ara Tupua - Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One CEDF | Waka Kotahi | September 22, 2020 3 Figure 2.23 View of Te Ana Bay, looking towards Pari Karangaranga (Cliff of Echoes). 2. Context Context All of the major faults in the Wellington Region (and the subduction This section of the CEDF 2.1 A Dynamic Coastal Landscape interface) have the potential to rupture causing instant and severe damage to the built environment and transportation networks, and to change the sets out the contextual The landscape along the Project route is dynamic and ever-changing landscape surrounding the Project area, Wellington City and the wider with a highly modified reclaimed coastline. The natural land forms are region. analysis that has informed characterised by historic and ongoing seismic activity and high energy coastal processes such as waves, strong winds and tides. In the event of a strong earthquake, significant liquefaction and/or ground shaking amplification is anticipated in the Pito-One area3. Low lying the Project vision, principles The narrative of Te Ara Tupua clearly expresses a dynamic landscape land and streams along the harbour edge (including the Project area) created by the Tupua. The word Tupua refers to phenomenon and the could also be at risk of a tsunami and temporarily elevated water levels, and design themes. narrative of Ngāke and Whātaitai, in creating the harbour Te Whanganui as experienced in the 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake (page 44). These a Tara and Te Awa Kairangi, the Hutt River, are expressive of the land seismic matters are key to the design of any structures for the Project. The purpose of the contextual analysis is to fully understand the area, its formation events that characterise the area. Escarpment and Uplifted Landforms complexities, and to establish the key constraints and opportunities of the Project. Understanding the Project context is essential to ensure the The Project design response does address these dynamic conditions, and Wellington harbour occupies a down faulted valley with remnant ridges of vision and objectives are achieved. A deep understanding of the existing the effects of future sea-level rise and climate change. A design response Matiu (Somes) and Mākaro (Ward) Islands remaining above sea level. environment is key to the development of practicable and effective design to climate change provides an opportunity to consider resilience for the measures to avoid and manage adverse effects and to build in benefits, wider road and rail transport corridors, as reflected in the objectives. A steep, uplifted escarpment provides a prominent backdrop to the coastal positive outcomes. In line with the NZCPS and the Coastal Hazards and Climate Change Guidance Manual (MfE 2017), the Project design must give consideration shelf of the Project area, rising to approximately 200m. To the south, the escarpment is defined by the Ngā Ūranga Gorge and stream (Waitohi). The context analysis considers aspects of the broader coastal and cultural to effects and hazards over a 100 year timeframe. As a result, the design Various short, sharp streams descend the face of the escarpment, most landscape setting and urban connections that have shaped the existing for this Project includes allowance for adaptive response for the predicted notably Waihinahina Stream at Horokiwi and Korokoro Stream north of environment of Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One. climate change effects and sea-level rise (SLR) over that time. Safety for pedestrians, cyclists and other user groups in this environment is also the Pito-One interchange. All streams are culverted under the transport corridor with Korokoro Stream daylighted through Honiana Te Puni Section 3 (Design Outcomes) brings the high level design themes and essential. Reserve into a naturalised stream mouth through reclaimed land. context analysis together to describe specific design measures and parameters that should be integrated to achieve the vision and objectives The existing road and rail transport corridor from Ngā Ūranga to Pito-One for the Project. Faults & Geology is built on the narrow raised platform, uplifted during the 1855 Wairarapa earthquake (Figure 2.65 on page 47). Subsequent transport and Sections 4 and 5 includes the draft masterplan, cross sections and Seismic Context reclamation projects have removed headlands and ends of spurs, and illustrations, as developed to be consistent with the design outcomes in introduced rip rap and concrete sea walls with backfill to extend the shelf this CEDF. Wellington is a seismically active city, sited upon the meeting point of two area for road and rail. The uplifted coastal shelf and modifications resulted tectonic plates; The Australian Plate and the subducting Pacific Plate1. in a relatively linear coastline with engineered structures interspersed with Major faults in the region include: The Ohariu Fault, Otaki Forks Fault, minor remnant headlands, shallow gravel beaches and offshore natural Wairarapa Fault, and Wellington Fault (Figure 2.24). rocky outcrops.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selwyn Katene Powerpoint
    Treaty Negotiations in Te Whanganui a Tara: The KhKahawai and the Shark Selwyn Katene Ngati Toa, Ngati Tama, Ngaruahine BACKGROUND Te Upoko o te Ika a Maui or ‘head of Maui's fish’ Kupe 1000 years ago Tara son of Whatonga - Te Whanganui a Tara From 1820s Taranaki & Kawhia tribes through rights of conquest, continuous occupation, ohaki (gifting) tangata whenua KEY ISSUES Effectiveness of small iwi ggpgroup, Ngati Tama (NT) struggling to assert its identity, mana, and tino rangatiratanga Role of the Crown, and others, in attempts to re-establish autonomous iwi-specific voice & focus for advancement of NT interests CLAIMS Tw o N gati Tama claims: Wai 735 claim Ngati Tama ki teUpokooteIka Wai 377 claim Ngati TamaTe Kaeaea Main claim number Wai 145 Wellington Tenths Trust & Palmerston North Maori Reserves ◦ The 8 gene ra l cla ims merge into large r natura l grouping of iwi, hapu, whanau, and marae interests – Port Nicholson Block Claim (PNBC) – to negotiate and settle on behalf of all TkiTaranaki clilaimants CLAIM AREA Some 209, 000 acres covering the greater Wellington area: 17,,py900 acres NZ Company claimed to have purchased from Taranaki tribes ◦ 137,242 acres of ‘wasteland’ Crown gave itself title to on assumption tha t no-one hdhad title because not occupied or cultivated by Maori CROWN BREACHES Accepting as valid purchases by the NZ Company, which could not possibly have constituted a legal sale or provided valid title to the land CROWN BREACHES (cont) Disposing of wrongfully acquired land by sale to the private sector, grants
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
    Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 3 Chamber of Commerce House 15 Daly Street Lower Hutt Wellington 5010 New Zealand 30 April 2021 Hon Michael Wood Minister
    Level 3 Chamber of Commerce House 15 Daly Street Lower Hutt Wellington 5010 New Zealand 30 April 2021 Hon Michael Wood Minister of Transport By email; [email protected] Dear Minister, NZ Upgrade Programme – Melling Interchange The Board and membership of the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce and Industry is alarmed and deeply disappointed to read recent media articles regarding the inclusion of Melling Interchange in the Government’s reassessment of infrastructure development projects. As you may be aware the Hutt Valley Chamber has been calling for the re-development of the Melling Interchange with SH2 for many years. As a national roading project the current Melling/SH2 intersection is completely inadequate, causing traffic bottlenecks daily and regular accidents. It is a crucial piece of local infrastructure that is a constant chokepoint for all our businesses trying to move people, materials and products around the valley, the region, and nationally. It is an economic drain on our local Hutt Valley economy as well as the wider Wellington region and continues to get worse every year. However, it is not a stand alone transport project. The redevelopment of the SH2/Melling interchange underpins the greater RiverLink project which completely transforms the Lower Hutt city centre. RiverLink is regarded as a shining example of how Waka Kotahi, the Greater Wellington Regional Council and the Hutt City Council can work collaboratively, leveraging combined budgets to deliver a single project in a cohesive manner. It includes improving public transport to the city centre with upgraded railway infrastructure, new active transport modes with cycling and walking, as well as enabling new housing options for city centre residents.
    [Show full text]
  • (Māori) Battalion
    Fact sheet 5: The formation of the 28th (Māori) Battalion When the decision was made in October 1939 to form a Māori military unit one suggestion was to call it the ‘Treaty of Waitangi’ battalion. It was felt that this would draw the attention of both Māori and Pākehā to their respective obligations under the Treaty. Article Three of the Treaty spoke of the rights and obligations of British subjects, something Āpirana Ngata saw as ‘the price of citizenship’. He believed that if Māori were to have a say in shaping the future of the nation after the war, they needed to participate fully during it. It was also a matter of pride. As Ngata asked, ‘how can we ever hold up our heads, when the struggle is over, to the question, “Where were you when New Zealand was at war?”’ Officially called the New Zealand 28th (Māori) Battalion, the unit was part of the 2nd New Zealand Division, the fighting arm of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2NZEF). The NZ Division was made up of 15,000- 20,000 men, divided into three infantry brigades (the 4th, 5th and 6th Brigades) plus artillery, engineers, signals, medical and service units. Each brigade initially had three infantry battalions (numbered from 18th to 26th). The 28th (Māori) Battalion was at times attached to each of the Division's three brigades. Each battalion was commanded by a lieutenant-colonel. The Māori Battalion usually contained 700-750 men, divided into five companies. The Māori Battalion’s four rifle companies were organised on a tribal basis: • A Company was based on recruits from
    [Show full text]
  • Dougal Austin
    Te Hei Tiki A Cultural Continuum DOUGAL AUSTIN TeHeiTiki_TXT_KB6.indd 2-3 29/04/19 8:20 PM He kupu whakataki Introduction 9 01/ Ngā whakamāramatanga Use and meaning 15 02/ Ngā momo me ngā āhua Types and shapes 27 03/ Te pūtakenga mai Physical origins 49 04/ Ngā kōrero kairangi Exalted histories 93 Contents 05/ Ngā tohu ā-iwi Tribal styles 117 06/ Ngā tai whakaawe External versus local influence 139 07/ Ka whiti ka pūmau, 1750–1900 Change and continuity, 1750–1900 153 08/ Te whānako toi taketake, ngā tau 1890–ināianei Cultural appropriation, 1890s–present 185 09/ Te hei tiki me te Māori, 1900–ināianei Māori and hei tiki, 1900–present 199 He kupu whakakapi Epilogue 258 Appendices, Notes, Glossary, Select bibliography, Image credits, Acknowledgements, Index 263 TeHeiTiki_TXT_KB6.indd 6-7 29/04/19 8:20 PM He kupu whakataki Introduction 9 TeHeiTiki_TXT_KB6.indd 8-9 29/04/19 8:20 PM āori personal adornments take a wide variety of forms, all treasured greatly, but without a doubt Mthe human-figure pendants called hei tiki are the most highly esteemed and culturally iconic. This book celebrates the long history of hei tiki and their enduring cultural potency for the Māori people of Aotearoa. Today, these prized pendants are enjoying a resurgence in popularity, part of the late twentieth- to early twenty-first- century revitalisation of Māori culture, which continues to progress from strength to strength. In many ways the story of hei tiki mirrors the changing fortunes of a people, throughout times of prosperity, struggle, adaptation and resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Bill
    Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill . records the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngati Tama in the deed of settlement dated 20 December 2001 between the Crown and Ngati Tama: gives effect to the deed of settlement in which the Crown and Ngati Tama agree to a final settlement of all the Ngati Tama historical claims in Taranaki. Scope of settlement Ngati Tama is one of the 8 iwi of Taranaki. They are located in northern Taranaki and have approximately 900 registered members. In the deed of settlement, and in this Bill, Ngati Tama have been defined as the descendants of- • Whata, Rakaeiora, or Tamaariki; and • people who exercised customary interests in the Ngati Tama area of interest from 1 January 1800. The settlement settles all of the historical claims of Ngati Tama in Taranaki. Those claims include all claims that are founded on a right arising from the Treaty of Waitangi or the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, under legislation or at common law (including aboriginal title or customary law), from fiduciary duty or otherwise, and that arise from, or relate to, acts or omissions before 21 September 1992 by, or on behalf of, the Crown or by or under legislation. The Crown is released and discharged from all obligations and liabilities in respect of those claims. *1 1 Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Explanatory note Any claims that Ngati Tama may have as a result of any loss of interest in land, or natural or physical resources, outside of Taranaki are not settled under the deed of settlement or this Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Suitability of Captive-Bred Founders for Lizard Restoration Projects Using Duvaucel’S Geckos (Hoplodactylus Duvaucelii)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. An assessment of the suitability of captive-bred founders for lizard restoration projects using Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. Vivienne Glenday 2016 Abstract Sourcing founders for species restoration projects can be problematic, especially when using rare or endangered animals. Harvesting from small natural populations could be detrimental to those populations. A possible solution is to use captive-bred founders as this would reduce harvesting pressure on natural source populations. In the summer of 2013, a combination of captive-bred and wild-sourced Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii) were released on two islands in Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf. To assess the suitability of captive-bred founders for species restoration projects, short-term survival, condition, reproductive performance, dispersal and activity patterns, and habitat use were investigated using mark-recapture surveys and radio telemetry over a 12 month period following the release, and comparisons were made between captive-bred and wild- sourced geckos. Captive-bred geckos were encountered more often than wild geckos one year after the release, and had greater increases in body condition index. They also had better overall health, but more partial tail losses. Gravid females from both groups were encountered during the first post-release breeding season and at least 50% of juveniles were encountered alive during the first year.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauri Monitoring Framework. Pilot Study on the Papanui Stream
    Te Hā o Te Wai Māreparepa “The Breath of the Rippling Waters” Mauri Monitoring Framework Pilot Study on the Papanui Stream Report Prepared for the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Research Team Members Brian Gregory Dr Benita Wakefield Garth Harmsworth Marge Hape HBRC Report No. SD 15-03 Joanne Heperi HBRC Plan No. 4729 2 March 2015 (i) Ngā Mihi Toi tü te Marae a Tane, toi tü te Marae a Tangaroa, toi tü te iwi If you preserve the integrity of the land (the realm of Tane), and the sea (the realm of Tangaroa), you will preserve the people as well Ka mihi rā ki ngā marae, ki ngā hapū o Tamatea whānui, e manaaki ana i a Papatūānuku, e tiaki ana i ngā taonga a ō tātau hapu, ō tātau iwi. Ka mihi rā ki ngā mate huhua i roro i te pō. Kei ngā tūpuna, moe mai rā, moe mai rā, moe mai rā. Ki te hunga, nā rātau tēnei rīpoata. Ki ngā kairangahau, ka mihi rā ki a koutou eū mārika nei ki tēnei kaupapa. Tena koutou. Ko te tūmanako, ka ora nei, ka whai kaha ngāwhakatipuranga kei te heke mai, ki te whakatutuki i ngā wawata o kui o koro mā,arā, ka tū rātau hei rangatira mō tēnei whenua. Tena koutou, tena koutou, tena koutou katoa Thanks to the many Marae, hapū, from the district of Tamatea for their involvement and concerns about the environment and taonga that is very precious to their iwi and hapū. Also acknowledge those tūpuna that have gone before us.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngaruroro Values and Attributes Report
    Ngaruroro Values and Attributes Report 28 October 2016 Te Tira Wai Tuhi Kate McArthur - The Catalyst Group Morry Black - Mauri Protection Agency Marei Apatu - Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga Ngatai Huata – Auaha, Te Runanganui, Waipatu Te Ao Turoa Representative Joella Brown – Te Runanganui, Korongata Te Ao Turoa Representative Ngaio Tiuka - Ngāti Kahungunu Iwi Incorporated He Rārangi Wai Ūpoko - List of Contents He Rārangi Wai Ūpoko - List of Contents .............................................................................................. ii Rārangi Whakaahua – List of Figures ................................................................................................. v Rārangi Ripanga – List of Tables ....................................................................................................... vi He Waitohu ........................................................................................................................................... vii Te Hononga Māreikura .................................................................................................................... vii He Pepeha ........................................................................................................................................ viii Whakatauki ..................................................................................................................................... viii He Mihi .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ngati Maniapoto/Ngati Tama Settlement Cross-Claims Report
    THE NGÂTI MANIAPOTO/NGÂTI TAMA SETTLEMENT CROSS-CLAIMS REPORT WAITANGI TRIBUNAL REPORT 2001 The Ngâti Maniapoto/Ngâti Tama Settlement Cross-Claims Report THE NGÂTI MANIAPOTO/NGÂTI TAMA SETTLEMENT CROSS-CLAIMS REPORT Wai 788, Wai 800 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2001 The cover design by Cliä Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent interwoven development of Maori and Pakeha history in New Zealand as it continuously unfolds in a pattern not yet completely known A Waitangi Tribunal report isbn 1-86956-259-3 © Waitangi Tribunal 2001 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by Legislation Direct, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by SecuraCopy, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Adobe Minion and Cronos multiple master typefaces Contents Letter of Transmittal _____________________________________________________vii The Ngâti Maniapoto/Ngâti Tama Settlement Cross-Claims Report 1. The Background to the Urgent Hearing ______________________________________1 1.1 The Taranaki Report __________________________________________________1 1.2 The Ngâti Tama heads of agreement _____________________________________2 1.3 The Ngâti Maniapoto claims ___________________________________________2 1.4 Mediation _________________________________________________________4 1.5 Urgency is granted___________________________________________________4 1.6 Revision of the Ngâti Tama settlement package_____________________________5 2. The Hearing ___________________________________________________________8 3. The Issues ____________________________________________________________11
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Hutt Valley Line
    2. Hutt Valley Line TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 4 SUMMARY OF HUTT VALLEY LINE TRAIN REPLACEMENT SERVICES OUTBOUND FROM WELLINGTON: When two buses depart for one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Depart Wellington to Ngauranga, drop of Woburn and connect to all stopper at Waterloo • Bus 2: Depart Wellington express to Petone, all stops to Waterloo, connect with Waterloo Loop and all stops to Upper Hutt • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream INBOUND FROM UPPER-HUTT: When two buses are operating one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Departs Waterloo and then all stops to Wellington • Bus 2: Depart Upper Hutt all stops to Waterloo then express to Wellington • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream HVL LINE HVL TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 5 TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 6 HUTT VALLEY LINE BUSES REPLACING TRAIN STOPS Ngauranga Inbound: On Hutt Road, after the underbridge Outbound: On Hutt Road, after the intersection HVL LINEHVL Petone Inbound: On Hutt Road, opposite the station Outbound: Bus stop B on Hutt Road, on the East side of the station TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 7 Ava Inbound: On Wakefield Street near the pedestrian over bridge access Outbound: On Wakefield Street, just before Cuba Street HVL LINE HVL Woburn Inbound: On Cambridge Terrace, opposite the station car park Outbound: The Cambridge Terrace bus shelter in front of the station car park TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 8 Waterloo
    [Show full text]