128808NCJRS.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

128808NCJRS.Pdf If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. / ~ 8808 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT .' OFFICE FOR DRUG-FREE NEIGHBORHOODS Drug Information & Strategy Clearinghouse RESOURCE LIST: STATE LEVEL CONTACTS ) 12E:808 '. U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of JUstice This document .ha~ bee~ .rep:oduced exactly as received from the pers~n or organization originating il. Points of view or opinions stated In thiS document. ~re th~s.e of the authors and do not necessarily repr~sent the offiCial position or pOliCies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this 1 3 " I material has been granted by Pub] j c Domajn/U S. Dept of He a l...t.h-all-d-.I.I-Yrnan S ePJ:-:b~~C:-le,*s'l-­ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). ~urther reproduction outside of the NCJRS system reqUires permis­ sion of the ~ owner. DRUG INFORMATION & STRATEGY CLEARINGHOUSE • 1--800-245-2691 1 • 1 0 ACTION - STATE PROGRAM DIRECTORS 4 0 DEA DEMAND REDUCTION COORDINATORS 6 0 FBI DEMAND REDUCTION COORDINATORS 10 0 LECC VICTIM/WITNESS COORDINATORS 19 0 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE DIRECTORS (NASADAD) 23 0 NATIONAL PREVENTION NETWORK • 28 0 RADAR NETWORK PARTICIPANTS 33 0 STATE CRIME PREVENTION CONTACTS • ACTION· STATE PROGRAM DIRECTORS Robert Torvestad Joel Weinstein ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director • Federal Building, Room 2506 #339 Federal Building 700 West Capitol Street 210 Walnut Little Rock, AK 72201-3291 West Des Moines, IA 50309-2195 John D. Timmons Wilford Overgaard ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director 2121 8th Avenue North, Room 722 The Alaska Center, Suite 340 Birmingham, AL 35203-2307 1020 Main Street Boise, ID 83702-5745 Jess Sixkiller ACTION State Program Director James E. Braxton 522 North Central, Room 205-A ACTION State Program Director Phoenix, AZ 85004-2190 10 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor Chicago, IL 60604-3964 Margaret Rogers ACTION State Program Director Thomas L. Haskett Federal Building, Room 14218 ACTION State Program Director 11000 Wilshire Boulevard 46 East Ohio Street Los Angeles, CA 90024-3671 Indianapolis, IN 46204-1922 Peter A. Heinaru James M. Byrnes ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director 211 Main Street, Room 534 Federal Building, Room 171 San Francisco, CA 94105-1974 444 South Quincy Topeka, KS 66603-3501 Romero A. Cherry ACTION State Program Director B. I. Cheney, Jr. Abraham Ribicoff Federal Building ACTION State Program Director • 450 Main Street, Room 524 Federal Building, Room 372-D Hartford, CN 06103-3002 600 Federal Place Louisville, KY 40202-2230 Wayne C. Olson ACTION State Program Director Willard L. Labrie Columbine Building, Room 301 ACTION State Program Director 1845 Sherman Street 626 Main Street, Suite 102 Denver, CO 80203-1167 Baton Rouge, LA 70801-1911 Henry J. Jibaja William K. Cosby ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director 930 Woodcock Road, Suite 221 10 Causeway Street, Room 467 Orlando, FL 32803-3750 Boston, MA 02222-1038 David A. Dammann Jerry E. Yates ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director 75 Piedmaon Avenue, NE, Suite 412 Federal Building, Room 1125 Atlanta, GA 30303-2587 31 Hopkins Plaza Baltimore, MD 21201-2814 Michael Gale ACTION State Program Director Thomas E. Endres Federal Building ACTION State Program Director PO Box 50024 Federal Building, Room 210 Honolulu, HI 96850 76 Pearl Street Portland, ME 04101-4188 • 1 Stanley Steward Steven Gordon ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Federal Building, Room 652 4600 Keitzke Lane, Suite E-141 231 West Lafayette Boulevard Reno, NV 89502-1208 • Detroit, MI 48226-2799 Bernard A. Conte Peter A. Marks ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Jacob A. Javits Federal Building Old Federal Building, Room 126 26 Federal Plaza, Suite 1609 212 Third Avenue South New York, NY 10278-0002 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2596 Carolyn C. Whitlock John J. McDonald ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building 445 Federal Office Building, Room 1701 Broadway, Room 103 911 Walnut Albany, NY 12207-2923 Kansas City, MO 64106-2009 Ed Strinko Arthur Brown, III ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Federal Building, Room 500 Federal Building, Room 1005-A 85 Marconi Boulevard Jackson, MS 39269-1092 Columbus, OH 43215-2888 Joe R. Lovelady Robert Torvestad ACTION State Program Director Acting ACTION State Program Director Federal Office Building, Room 192 722 North Broadway, Room 101 Helena, MT 59626-0101 Oklahoma City, OK 73102-6093 Robert L. Winston Stephen N. Stivers ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director P.O. Century Station Federal Building, Room 647 Federal Building, Room 131 511 NW Broadway • 300 Fayetteville Street Mall Portland, OR 97209-3416 Raleigh, NC 27601-1739 Sally W. Yurchuck Anne C. Johnson ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director U.S. Customs House, Room 108 Federal Building, Room 293 2nd & Chestnut Streets 100 Centennial Mall North Philadelphia, PA 19106-2998 Lincoln, NE 68508-3896 ACTION State Program Director Peter Bender Federico Gatau Federal Building ACTION State Program Director Carlos Chardon Avenue, Room 662 Federal Post Office and Courthouse Hato Rey, PR 00918-2241 55 Pleasant Street, Room 316 Concord, NH 03301-3939 Vincent Marzullo ACTION State Program Director Stanley Gorland John E. Fogarty Building, Room 200 ACTION State Program Director 24 Weybosset Street Broad Street Bank Building, Room 422 Providence, RI 02903-2882 402 East State Street Trenton, NJ 08608-1507 Jerome J. Davis ACTION State Program Director Ernesto Ramos Federal Building, Room 872 ACTION State Program Director 1835 Assembly Street Federal Building, Room 129 Columbia, SC 29201-2430 Cathedral Place Santa Fe, NM 87501-2026 • 2 Vernon Ashley John Miller ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Federal Building, Room 214 Federal Office Building, Suite 3039 225 South Pierre Street 909 First Avenue • Pierre, SD 57501-2452 Seattle, WA 98174 Alfred E. Johnson John Miller ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Federal Building/US Courthouse, Room 246 Federal Office Building, Suite 3039 801 Broadway 909 First Avenue Nashville, TN 37203-3889 Seattle, WA 98174-1103 Jerry G. Thompson Michael P. Murphy ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director 611 East Sixth Street, Suite 107 517 East Wisconsin Avenue, Room 601 Austin, TX 78701-3747 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4507 Gary O'Neal B. I. Cheney ACTION State Program Director Acting ACTION State Program Director U.S. Post Office and Courthouse 603 Morris Street, 2nd Floor 350 South Main Street, Room 107 Charleston, WV 25305 Salt Lake City, UT 84101-2198 Wayne C. Olson Lindsay Scott ACTION State Program Director ACTION State Program Director Federal Building, Room 8036 400 North 8th Street 2120 Capitol Avenue PO Box 10066 Cheyenne, WY 82001-3649 • Richmond, VA 23240-1932 • 3 OEA DEMAND REDUCTION COORDINATORS These individuals are available to give speeches, teach groups about drug abuse prevention and • participate in community programs. Ann Hayes Special Agent Robert McGuire DEA - New York Field Division SpeCial Agent 555 West 57th Street, Suite 1900 DEA - San Francisco Field Division New York, NY 10019 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 12215 (212) 399-5151 San FranCiSCO, CA 94102 (415) 556-6771 James Hicks Special Agent Roland Talton DEA - San Diego Field Division Special Agent 402 West 35th Street DEA - Los Angeles Field Division National City, CA 92050 350 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 800 (619) 585-4200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 894-2650 John Smith Special Agent Ron Hollingshead DEA - Philadelphia Field Division Special Agent William J. Green Federal Building DEA - Denver Field Division 600 Arch Street, Room 10224 316 U.S. Customs House Philadelphia, PA 19106 Post Office Box 1860 (215) 597-9530 Denver, CO 80201 (303) 844-3951 Michael D. Dromgoole Special Agent Shirley A. Armstead DEA - Dallas Field Division Special Agent 1880 Regal Row DEA - St. Louis Field Division Dallas, TX 75235 7911 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 500 • (214) 767-7151 St. Louis, MO 62105 (314) 425-3241 Michael Streicher Special Agent Steve Morreale DEA - Chicago Field Division SpeCial Agent 500 Dirksen Federal Building DEA - Boston Field Division 219 S. Dearborn Street G-64 JFK Federal Building Chicago, IL 60604 Boston, MA 02203 (312) 353-7875 (617) 565-2800 Phillip Maddox Steve Starling Special Agent Special Agent DEA - New Orleans Field Division DEA - Atlanta Field Division 1661 Canal Street, Suite 2200 75 Spring Street, SW, Room 740 New Orleans, LA 70112 Atlanta, GA 30303 (504) 589-3894 (404) 331-4401 Robert Dey Thomas R. Russo Special Agent Special Agent DEA - Houston Field Division DEA - Washington Field Division 333 West Loop North 400 Sixth Street, SW, Room 2558 Houston, TX 77024 Washington, DC 20024 (713) 681-1771 (202) 724-7834 • 4 Tom Childers Wayne Roques Special Agent Special Agent DEA - Phoenix Field Division DEA - Miami Field Division 1 North First Street, Suite 201 8400 N.W. 53rd Street • Phoenix, AZ 85004 Miami, FL 33166 (602) 261-4866 (305) 591-4870 Tom Pool William Weinman Special Agent Special Agent DEA - Seattle Field Division DEA - Detroit Field Division 220 West Mercer 357 Federal Building Seattle, WA 98119 231 West Lafayette (206) 442-5443 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226-7290 Vic Pedalino Special Agent DEA - Newark Field Divi ..·;on Federal Office Building
Recommended publications
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT
    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Alaska
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ERIC FLORES, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Case No. 2:15-cv-00002-SLG Respondents. ORDER OF DISMISSAL On April 24, 2015, Eric Flores, a self-represented resident of Texas, filed a class action Petition to Challenge the Constitutionality of the First Amendment, an Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee, and a Motion to Transfer his case to the District of Columbia.1 Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 requires the Court to review the action, and to dismiss if the action “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.”2 1 Dockets 1, 3, 5, 6. 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 n. 10 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Congress inserted 1915(e)(2) into the in forma pauperis statute, and we must follow this clear statutory direction.”); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The district court . properly concluded that Calhoun’s [non-prisoner] complaint should not be allowed to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (requiring dismissal of in forma pauperis proceedings that seek monetary relief against immune defendants).”); Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1348 (11th Cir. 2001) (Under section § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) . “dismissal is now mandatory. [T]he complaint now may .
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC LAW 85-508-JULY 7, 1958 339 Public Law 85-508 an ACT to Provide for the Admission of the State of Alaska Into the Union
    i2 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 85-508-JULY 7, 1958 339 Public Law 85-508 AN ACT July 7, 1958 To provide for the admission of the State of Alaska into the Union. ta R. 7999—] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Alaska, siaie- United States of America in Congress assemhled. That, subject to the hood. provisions of this Act, and upon issuance of the proclamation required by section 8 (c) of this Act, the State of Alaska is hereby declared to be a State of the United States of America, is declared admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the other States in all respects whatever, and the constitution formed pursuant to the provisions of the Act of the Territorial Legislature of Alaska entitled, "An Act to provide for the holding of a constitutional convention to prepare a constitution for the State of Alaska; to submit the con­ stitution to the people for adoption or rejection; to prepare for the admission of Alaska as a State; to make an appropriation; and setting an effective date", approved March 19, 1955 (Chapter 46, Session Laws of Alaska, 1955), and adopted by a vote of the people of Alaska in the election held on April 24, 1956, is hereby found to be republican in form and in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the principles of the Declaration of Independence, and is hereby accepted, ratified, and confirmed. SEC. 2. The State of Alaska shall consist of all the territory, Territory,, together with the territorial waters appurtenant thereto, now included in the Territory of Alaska, SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    Attorney General Doug Peterson News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 5, 2019 Attorney General Peterson Urges Congress to Take Action Against Robocalls Lincoln – Today, Attorney General Peterson urged the U.S. Senate to enact the Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act, legislation to curb illegal robocalls and spoofing. A coalition of 51 attorneys general, led by Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, New Hampshire Attorney General Gordon J. MacDonald, and Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, sent a letter to the U. S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation supporting the TRACED Act. The legislation is sponsored by Sens. John Thune and Ed Markey. Attorney General Peterson said, “State attorneys general are on the front lines of helping consumers who are harassed and scammed by unwanted calls. For years, we have worked with both our federal counterparts and industry participants to encourage the adoption of technological solutions in the fight against these calls. I am proud to support this legislation.” In their letter, the attorneys general state that the TRACED Act enables states, federal regulators, and telecom providers to take steps to combat these illegal calls. The legislation will require voice service providers to participate in a call authentication framework to help block unwanted calls and creates an interagency working group to take additional actions to reduce robocalls and hold telemarketers and robocallers accountable. More than 48 billion robocalls were made in 2018, making them the number one source of consumer complaints to the FTC and the FCC and resulting in millions in consumer losses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Law Powers of the Nevada Attorney General: Ryan V
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-3\NVJ315.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-MAY-14 10:00 THE COMMON LAW POWERS OF THE NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL: RYAN V. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT Robert Stewart* The office of the attorney general derived from thirteenth-century England and voyaged with the American settlers across the Atlantic, ultimately taking root in each of the thirteen original colonies.1 There, the colonial attorneys general took on a wide variety of duties,2 many of which originated from the common law, such as being “intrusted with the management of all legal affairs and the prosecution of all suits, civil and criminal, in which the crown was interested.”3 Time passed, the nation expanded, and now every state wields an attorney general.4 The majority of states uphold their attorneys general’s com- mon law powers5—while simultaneously authorizing legislatures to withdraw * Juris Doctorate Candidate, May 2014, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Articles Editor, Nevada Law Journal Volume 14. 1 See William P. Marshall, Break Up the Presidency? Governors, State Attorneys General, and Lessons from the Divided Executive, 115 YALE L.J. 2446, 2449–50 (2006). 2 For example, in 1708, the duties of the South Carolina Attorney General were specified as follows: [T]o Act, Plead, Implead, Sue and Prosecute all and every Person & Persons whatsoever, for all Debts, Fines, Amerciaments, Forfeitures, Escheats Claims and Demands whatsoever which now is or may or Shall be Due and in Arrears to Us upon any Account whatsoever whither Rents, Revenues or otherwise howsoever, And to Prosecute all Matters Criminall as well as Civill Giv- ing and hereby Granting unto You full Power and authority and the Premises therein to Deal Doe Execute and Performe in as large and Ample manner to all Intents and Purposes as to the Said office of Attorney Generall doth in any way Appertaine & bellong .
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-4-1888 Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting the Annual Report of the Governor of Alaska upon the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No. 297, 50th Cong., 1st Sess. (1888) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 50TH CoNGRESS, L HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. J Ex. Doc. 1st Session. f t No. 297. ALASKA SEAL AND FUR COMPANY. LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, TRANSMITTING The annual report of the governor of Alaska upon the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company. MAY 4, 1888.-Referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and ordered to be printed. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Washington, May 2, 1888. SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a report to Congress by the governor of Alaska of the result of his inquiry into the operations of the Alaska Seal and Fur Company (Alaska Commercial Company), as required of him by sectiou5 of the act of May 17, 1884, entitled "An act providing a civil government for Alaska." Very respectfully, WM.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court District of Alaska 222 W. 7Th Avenue, Box 4, Rm 229 Anchorage, Alaska 99513
    United States District Court District of Alaska 222 W. 7th Avenue, Box 4, Rm 229 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 www.akd.uscourts.gov Position: Case Administrator II, Job# USDC 20-02 (Permanent, Part-time) (20 hours per week) Opening Date: August 26, 2020 Closing Date: September 9, 2020, or open until filled Starting Salary: $23,654 - $38,475 (CL 25, Step 1-61)* *Depending on qualifications and experience Location: Fairbanks, Alaska The United States District Court for the District of Alaska is seeking qualified applicants for the position of Case Administrator in Fairbanks, Alaska. The Case Administrator monitors the progression of civil and criminal cases and related proceedings. They receive and review incoming court documents with conformity with federal and local rules, and perform customer service and cashier duties for the purpose of providing procedural information and collection court fees. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: • Open and process new appeals and appeal related documents. Process opinions and close appeals. Make summary entries on all documents and proceedings. • Check for prior or prohibited filing. Verify attorney’s authority to practice. • Inform customers of required fees, receive payments and issue receipts. Process credit card payments for filed documents. • Create and process new case files. Docket initial events. Retrieve files and make copies of records for court personnel, attorneys or others. Certify court documents and ensure data quality. • Prepare, ship, and retrieve records from the appropriate Federal Records Center. Scan, copy, file and pick-up, and sort mail. Process e-mail received by electronic filers. Maintain court files. • Assist the public with electronic filing. Answer calls assisting attorneys and pro se litigants with filing questions and case status.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska TABLE of CONTENTS
    United States Sentencing Commission Statistical Information Packet Fiscal Year 2018 District of Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure A Federal Offenders by Type of Crime 1 Figure B Distribution of Primary Drug Type in Federal Drug Cases 2 Table 1 Distribution of Federal Offenders by Type of Crime 3 Table 2 Guilty Pleas and Trials in Each Circuit and District 4 Table 3 Guilty Pleas and Trials by Type of Crime 7 Table 4 Sentence Type by Type of Crime (National) 8 Table 5 Sentence Type by Type of Crime (District) 9 Table 6 Incarceration Rate of U.S. Citizen Offenders Eligible for Non-Prison Sentences by Type of Crime 10 Table 7 Sentence Length by Type of Crime 11 Table 8 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range 12 Table 9 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range in Each Circuit and District 13 Table 10 Sentence Imposed Relative to the Guideline Range by Type of Crime 16 Figure A FEDERAL OFFENDERS BY TYPE OF CRIME1 Fiscal Year 2018 National Drugs 28.1% Immigration 34.4% Firearms 10.8% Fraud/Theft/ Embezzlement Child 9.5% Pornography 2.0% Robbery Other 2.5% Money Sexual Abuse Laundering 9.2% 1.5% 1.9% Alaska Fraud/Theft/ Embezzlement 15.2% Robbery Drugs 4.6% 34.0% Money Laundering 4.6% Other 6.1% Sexual Abuse 2.5% Child Pornography 9.6% Firearms 23.4% The National figure includes the 69,425 cases reported to the Commission. The Drugs category includes trafficking and simple possession. The District of Alaska figure includes the 197 cases reported to the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT of ALASKA June 14, 2018
    DISTRICT OF ALASKA June 14, 2018 DISTRICT OF ALASKA’S REPORT TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT (2017-2018) By Mary B. Pinkel, LRCC Alaska Representative LAWYER REPRESENTATIVES The District of Alaska has four lawyer representatives: Andrea Hattan, an Assistant United States Attorney in Anchorage; Jamie McGrady, an Assistant Federal Defender in Anchorage; Richard Monkman, a private practitioner in Juneau; and Mary Pinkel, an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Alaska in Anchorage. Darrel Gardner, an Assistant Federal Defender, serves as the chair of the Lawyers Representative Coordinating Committee (LRCC) for the Ninth Circuit and as the Vice-President of the Federal Bar Association of the Ninth Circuit. Contact information for the Alaska District’s Lawyer Representatives is as follows: (1) Andrea Hattan, Assistant United States Attorney; (907) 271-5071; [email protected]; (2) Jamie McGrady, Assistant Federal Defender; (907) 646-3400; [email protected]; (3) Richard Monkman; (907)586-5880; [email protected]; and (4) Mary Pinkel, Assistant Attorney General; (907) 269-5190; [email protected]. JUDICIAL NEWS The Alaska District Court, under the leadership of Chief Judge Timothy Burgess, is in the planning process for a new courthouse, is revising both the local civil and criminal rules, and is in the process of hiring a new full-time Magistrate Judge. Judge Sharon Gleason has been working steadfastly with a local committee of attorneys to revise the local civil rules. She anticipates that the draft proposed new rules will be circulated for comment later this summer and that the revised rules will be in place by December 1, 2018, the date amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure become effective.
    [Show full text]
  • June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of The
    DANA NESSEL MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Lisa O. Monaco Deputy Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Department of Justice’s interpretation of Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084 Dear Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Monaco: We, the undersigned State Attorneys General, are seeking clarity and finality from the Department of Justice regarding its interpretation of the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084. As you may be aware, 25 State Attorneys General wrote to your predecessors on March 21, 2019 to express our strong objection to the Office of Legal Counsel’s (OLC’s) Opinion “Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non- Sports Gambling,” which reversed the Department’s seven-year-old position that the Wire Act applied only to sports betting. Many States relied on that former position to allow online gaming to proceed. Since that letter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a challenge to the new OLC Opinion, holding that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting. After the First Circuit decision, it is vital that States get clarity on the Department’s position going forward. States and industry participants need to understand what their rights are under the law without having to file suit in every federal circuit, and finality is needed so the industry may confidently invest in new products and features without fear of criminal prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate
    April 29, 2021 Senator Patrick Leahy Senator Richard Shelby Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on Appropriations 437 Russell Building 304 Russell Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Jerry Moran Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Appropriations Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 506 Hart Building 521 Dirksen Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Re: State Attorneys General Support the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chair DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, Chair Cartwright, and Ranking Member Aderholt, As state attorneys general, we respectfully request that you consider robust funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) in the Fiscal Year 2022 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. Since 1974, LSC funding has provided vital and diverse legal assistance to low-income Americans including victims of natural disasters, survivors of domestic violence, families facing foreclosure, and veterans accessing earned benefits. Today, LSC also provides essential support for struggling families affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the single largest funder of civil legal aid in the United States, LSC-funded programs touch every corner of our country with more than 800 offices and a presence in every congressional district. LSC funding has also fostered public-private partnerships between legal aid organizations and private firms and attorneys across the country which donate their time and skills to assist residents in need. Nationwide, 132 independent nonprofit legal aid programs rely on this federal funding to provide services to nearly two million of our constituents on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid & Stimulant Fact Sheet
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: KARA MCCARTHY, 202-307-1241 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2020 [email protected] OPIOID & STIMULANT FACT SHEET JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AWARDS MORE THAN $340 MILLION TO COMBAT OPIOID AND STIMULANT CRISES The Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs awarded grants totaling more than $340 million to help fight the addiction crisis looming over the United States, dramatically impacting crime victims, children, families, first responders and communities at large. Four components within OJP – the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) – provided funds to address the opioid and stimulant crisis. The following grants were awarded to help fight this crisis: Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Abuse Site-based and Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs BJA awarded 110 grants totaling more than $147 million to jurisdictions under BJA’s Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Abuse Site-based Program, which provides financial and technical assistance to state, local and tribal jurisdictions to reduce opioid and stimulant abuse and fatalities, and mitigate impacts on crime victims. Authorized by the 2016 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, these programs offer grant awards across three focus areas. Category 1 encourages and supports the development of comprehensive, locally driven responses to the opioid and stimulant epidemics that expand access to supervision, treatment and recovery support services across the criminal justice system; support law enforcement and other first responder diversion programs for non-violent drug offenders; promote education and prevention activities; and address the needs of children impacted by the opioid and stimulant epidemics.
    [Show full text]