MINIMUM FOUNDATION PROGRAM
2004-2005 Handbook
sult Re s or R g F August 2004 eachin Louisiana Department of Cecil J. Picard, State Superintendent of Education EDUCATION CONTENTS
Introduction ...... 1
SECTION I: MFP Formula Definitions
I. Level 1 - Cost Determination and Equitable Distribution of State and Local Funds
A. Base Foundation Level 1 State and Local Costs...... 5 Diagram: Student Characteristics and Weights...... 8 Diagram: Total Level 1 Costs ...... 13 B. Proportion of Base Foundation Level 1 Cost Allocated to the State 65 Percent and Local School System 35 Percent ...... 14 Diagram: Local Wealth Capacity...... 16 Diagram: Local Wealth Factor ...... 17 Diagram: Local Equalization Factor ...... 18 Diagram: Local Support of Level 1 Costs...... 20 Diagram: State Support of Level 1 Costs ...... 21
II. Level 2 - Incentive for Local Effort
A. Level 2 Eligible Local Revenue ...... 22 B. State Support of Level 2 Fiscal Effort ...... 23 Diagram: Determining Local Revenue Eligible for Level 2 Funding ...... 24 Diagram: Determining the Level 2 Limit...... 25 Diagram: Level 2 – Reward Funding...... 26 C. Minimum Foundation Program Level 1 and Level 2 State Funded Amounts...... 27
lll. Minimum Foundation Program Level 3 Legislative Enhancements
A. FY 2001-02 Certificated Pay Raise Continuation Enhancement ...... 27 B. FY 2002-03 Support Worker Pay Raise Continuation Enhancement ...... 27 C. Foreign Language Associates ...... 27 D. Accountability Student Transfer Enhancement…………………………………….… 27 E. Hold Harmless Enhancement...... 28
IV. Required Expenditure Amounts
A. Required Pay Raise – Certificated Staff ...... 28 B. 70% Local General Fund Required Instructional Expenditure ...... 29 C. Expenditure Requirement for Foreign Language Associate Program ...... 30
V. Funding for LSU and SU Laboratory Schools ...... 30
VI. Adjustments for Estimated Payments, Audit Findings and Data Revisions
A. Payment of Funds ...... 31 B. Audit Review ...... 31
VII. Definition of Timeliness and Reporting Documents for Attendance ...... 32
SECTION II: MFP Formula Calculations and Sources of Data ...... 33
SECTION III: Glossary ...... 47
APPENDIX A: Senate Concurrent Resolution 122 of 2004 ...... 51
APPENDIX B: MFP Transmittal Letter, Circular 1077...... 61
APPENDIX C: MFP Budget Letter, Circular 1077, FY 2004-05 ...... 65
APPENDIX D: Timelines for Preparation of the MFP Budget Letter under SCR 122 ...... 93 Introduction Introduction
The Minimum Foundation Program formula adopted by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and approved by the Legislature determines the cost of a minimum foundation program of education in all public elementary and secondary schools and helps to allocate the funds equitably to parish and city school systems. This handbook was created to provide the user with an informative reference of the various elements contained in the MFP formula.
Funding through the Minimum Foundation Program is in the form of a block grant from the State to the local school districts. Districts are afforded the flexibility to spend these funds as they determine to be in the best interest of the district while satisfying all mandated program requirements. Funds within the MFP are not earmarked for specific purposes but are intended, in combination with other funds available to the local districts, to provide the fiscal requirements of operating a school district.
Listed below are some important factors of the MFP formula.
Basic Components of the Louisiana School Finance System: Determine the cost of a minimum program of education Equitably distribute funds across all districts Provide Incentives for Local Support
MFP Detail Parts: Base per Pupil Amount $3,459 per SCR 122 - set annually by the SBESE with approval of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget or an increase of 2.75% over the prior year per pupil amount if the MFP continues to operate under the previous resolution because a new resolution was not adopted by the Legislature. Add-on weights - based on student characteristics recognizing the extra cost of instruction for certain categories of students or classes. At Risk Students (17%) Vocational Education Units (5%) Special Education Students Other Exceptionalites (150%) Gifted and Talented (60%) Economy of Scale up to 20% (for districts with less than 7,500 students) Total Level 1 Cost Local Wealth Equalization Targeted Local Contribution Targeted State Contribution Level 2 – Funding for Local Incentives Level 3 – Unequalized Funding
1 Introduction
Components of the MFP Formula: Level 1: Cost determination and Equitable distribution of State and Local Funds Base State and Local Costs Proportion Allocated to the State (65%) on average Proportion Allocated to the Local District (35%) on average Targeted local contribution based on local wealth factor (fiscal capacity relative to sales and property taxes) and proration factor for each district Level 2: Incentive for Local Effort Eligible Local Revenue - amount over Level 1 target State Support for Local Fiscal Effort greater than Level 1 target Level 3: Unequalized Funding Calculation of growth in Level 1 and 2 funding over prior year; 50% directed to certificated pay increases Continuation of FY 2001-02 state supplement for increase per full-time equivalent certificated employee Continuation of FY 2002-03 support worker pay raise Foreign Language Associate Funding Hold Harmless Funding
Summary of FY 2004-05 formula