A Research-Based Case for Recess Olga S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Research-Based Case for Recess Olga S www.usplaycoalition.clemson.edu November 2 01 3 A Research-Based Case for Recess Olga S. Jarrett, Georgia State University The recess issue. Recess has traditionally been an im - dren get 10-20 minute breaks between 45-minute les - portant part of the day for school children, a time when sons or five-minute breaks and a long lunch. Finnish and they organize their own games, play on playground Turkish children have 15 minutes to play after each 45 equipment, run and chase each other, carry on cultural minutes of work. Ugandan students have an eight-hour traditions of clapping games or jump rope rhymes, dig school day, but they have a half hour of play in the in the dirt, investigate nature, or talk with their friends. morning, one hour for lunch and play, and 1.5 hours of Compared to the rest of the school day, recess is a time activity time (sports, music, art, free-choice playtime) in when children have more freedom to choose what they the afternoon. want to do and with whom. For many children, recess In the U.S., policy and practice vary considerably is their favorite time in the day. The speaker of my state’s from state to state and from school to school. The prob - General Assembly agreed to co-sponsor legislation man - ability of children having 150 minutes a week of PE and dating recess admitting: “I would not have survived el - at least 20 minutes a day of recess was more likely in ementary school if it hadn’t been for recess.” states with laws requiring PE and encouraging recess. 5 A But over the past 20-25 years, recess has been cut study conducted in 2006 indicated 57% of school sys - back in some schools and completely cut out in others. tems required regularly scheduled recess in elementary On a 1989 survey of state superintendents conducted by school. 6 However, according to a study published in the National Association of Elementary School Princi - 2011, only 40% of school systems had an explicit recess pals (NAESP), 96% of school districts reported they had policy. Figures may vary in these studies, depending recess. 1 However, in the next 10 years, the number of upon who is being surveyed and whether questions in - schools with recess had decreased. By the late 1990’s, volve recess policy or recess practice. the lack of recess in many schools received considerable School systems may claim on surveys they have re - notoriety. A front page article in The New York Times cess when they sometimes have it. But who actually gets pictured a school built without a playground and recess is another matter and appears to be a social justice quoted Atlanta Public School Superintendent Benjamin issue. With a randomly selected sample of children on a O. Canada as saying: “We are intent on improving academic performance. You don’t do that by having What do elementary school principals say? kids hanging on the monkey bars.” 2 No Child Left Behind’s (NCLB) focus on test scores has resulted in Principals overwhelmingly believe recess has cutbacks in both the arts and in physical activity. Ac - a positive impact not only on the develop - cording to official figures provided by school systems ment of students’ social skills, but also on since the enactment of NCLB, 20% of U.S. school sys - achievement and learning in the classroom .7 tems decreased recess time, averaging recess cuts of 50 minutes per week. 3 In National Center for Educational Statistics data from 173 randomly selected school dis - randomly selected school day in 2002, researchers found tricts, 5.3% reported increases in recess while 32.3% that 79% had recess. 8 But only 61% of the African reported decreases. 4 American students and 75% of other minority students had recess compared to 85% of white students. Also, Who gets recess? Article 31 of the UN Convention on only 56% of those living below the poverty line had re - Rights of the Child states children have the right to play. cess compared to 83% of those above the poverty line. Many other countries, some of them top-ranking in in - In a survey of 1,055 schools, the Robert Wood John - ternational tests, give their children more frequent or ex - son Foundation found similar disparities between the tensive play breaks than does the United States. English recess haves and have-nots. 9 Length of recess was af - primary children have breaks in the morning and in the fected by school size, location, region, minority enroll - afternoon as well as a long lunch break. Japanese chil - ment, and eligibility for free and reduced-price lunch. Large, urban, Southeastern schools with high poverty fidgety and more on-task when they had recess. 12 Also, and high minority populations had the least recess, children with hyperactivity were among those who ben - sometimes none at all. In the Atlanta area, school efited the most. These results are consistent with the systems with high percentages of white suburban chil - findings of a meta-analysis of nearly 200 studies on the dren had recess at much higher rates than school sys - effect of exercise on cognitive functioning that suggest tems with high percentages of African American urban physical activity supports learning. 13 Research indicates children. 10 children perform better on literacy tasks after they have On a positive note, some school systems have re - had recess 14 and that children raise their hands more cently reinstated recess. Chicago public schools length - often after recess breaks. 15 The Centers for Disease Con - ened the school day to allow for 20 minutes of trol and Prevention issued a report in 2010 that ex - mandated recess. Some Atlanta area school systems with plored the associations between school-based physical policies against recess in 2003 have since changed their activity and academic performance. Of the eight recess policies to allow recess. How this policy change has af - studies they reviewed, six tested the effect of interven - fected individual schools and individual classrooms is tions on various aspects of academic performance (at - not known since my recent informal surveys of teacher tention/concentration), and two explored relationships interns and new teachers in high poverty schools suggest between recess and on-task behavior. All eight studies recess deprivation is widely used for punishment. Ac - found at least one positive relationship between having cording to these surveys, in approximately half the recess and some aspect of classroom behavior. None schools with recess, individual children, primarily found negative effects of recess. 16 African American and Hispanic males, are regularly de - Improvements in on-task behavior and attention prived of recess as punishment for a range of misbehav - after breaks strongly suggest recess might improve iors, including noise in the hall, talking back, tantrums, achievement. At the very least, it suggests that abolishing not finishing homework, and not finishing class work. recess to include more instructional time in the school day might be counter-productive. A Canadian study Academic benefits of recess. Employees, from factory compared attitudes, achievement, and fitness before and workers to long distance truck drivers, have breaks built after the school system decided to devote a third of the into their schedules to promote men - tal alertness. Do students also require breaks to promote mental alertness? What do pediatricians say? Brain research on attention suggests Safe and properly supervised recess offers children cognitive, physi - why breaks are needed: (a) the brain cal, emotional and social benefits. It should be used as a complement cannot maintain attention for long to physical education classes, not a substitute, and whether it’s spent periods of time, requiring contrast indoors or outdoors, recess should provide free, unstructured play or (such as a new location or novel stim - activity. The AAP recommends that recess should never be withheld uli) to regain focus; (b) for informa - as a punishment, as it serves as a fundamental component of devel - tion to be processed, down time is opment and social interaction that students may not receive in a needed to recycle chemicals crucial more complex school environment. Study authors conclude that mini - for long-term memory formation; mizing or eliminating recess can negatively affect academic achieve - and (c) attention is cyclical, involving ment, as growing evidence links recess to improved physical health, 90-110 minute rhythmical patterns social skills and cognitive development. throughout the day. 11 Teachers, parents, and commu - — American Academy of Pediatric s 17 nity leaders often wonder whether re - cess has an effect on test scores. school day to physical activity, art, and music. 18 Though There is little research that compares the same children there was less time for academics, student test scores in - with and without recess, and there is no longitudinal re - creased slightly and attitudes and fitness increased sig - search that examines the long-term effects of recess dep - nificantly. rivation. It would be unethical to deprive children of A few recent studies have examined relationships be - recess over the years just to examine the long-term ef - tween recess and behavior or achievement, but their fects. Hopefully, children who are deprived of recess one conclusions are confounded by socio-economic status. year might have recess the next year. So, conclusions Researchers found teachers rate children’s behavior as about recess need to be pieced together from a variety of better when they have at least 15 minutes of recess per studies. day, 19 but the schools with less than 15 minutes of recess In research with fourth-graders, children were less 2 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS BY ORGANIZATIONS • Children should have 60 minutes of physical activity a day.
Recommended publications
  • Commencement Speaker Committee
    Governance & Policies Effective: October 1997 University Governance Committees Which Are Modified by the Faculty Senate COMMENCEMENT SPEAKER COMMITTEE Approved: updated, fall 2009 Faculty Senate Bylaws Committee Membership 1. The committee is composed of one representative from each of the following four academic units: Education, Humanities, Science/Math, and Social Sciences, and one member from the non-school faculty, all elected by Faculty Senate for overlapping two-year terms. No representative may serve more than two consecutive terms. 2. Two student representatives serve on the committee. One is the chairperson of the University Board Speakers Committee and one is selected by the Student Senate for a one-year term. 3. The vice president for university advancement, who shall also serve as convener of the committee, and the director of student activities shall be members of the committee. 4. The terms of office begin 1 October, and the committee shall meet at least one time per year, usually during the fall semester, but at other times at the call of the convener or a majority of the members of the committee. Functions 1. The committee shall generate a pool of potential commencement speakers for consideration by the University president. 2. The pool shall be broadly representative in terms of race, gender, and academic discipline, and may include other considerations in order to promote enhanced diversity. 3. The speakers for the spring and winter commencements shall be drawn from the pool generated each fall by the committee. In the event a speaker cannot be obtained from the pool, nothing in this policy shall prevent the University administration from obtaining a commencement speaker from other avenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Motions Explained
    MOTIONS EXPLAINED Adjournment: Suspension of proceedings to another time or place. To adjourn means to suspend until a later stated time or place. Recess: Bodies are released to reassemble at a later time. The members may leave the meeting room, but are expected to remain nearby. A recess may be simply to allow a break (e.g. for lunch) or it may be related to the meeting (e.g. to allow time for vote‐counting). Register Complaint: To raise a question of privilege that permits a request related to the rights and privileges of the assembly or any of its members to be brought up. Any time a member feels their ability to serve is being affected by some condition. Make Body Follow Agenda: A call for the orders of the day is a motion to require the body to conform to its agenda or order of business. Lay Aside Temporarily: A motion to lay the question on the table (often simply "table") or the motion to postpone consideration is a proposal to suspend consideration of a pending motion. Close Debate: A motion to the previous question (also known as calling for the question, calling the question, close debate and other terms) is a motion to end debate, and the moving of amendments, on any debatable or amendable motion and bring that motion to an immediate vote. Limit or extend debate: The motion to limit or extend limits of debate is used to modify the rules of debate. Postpone to a certain time: In parliamentary procedure, a postponing to a certain time or postponing to a time certain is an act of the deliberative assembly, generally implemented as a motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Parliamentary Procedure
    Extension to Communities Simplifi ed Parliamentary Procedure 2 • Iowa State University Extension Introduction Effective Meetings — Simplifi ed Parliamentary Procedure “We must learn to run a meeting without victimizing the audience; but more impor- tantly, without being victimized by individuals who are armed with parliamentary procedure and a personal agenda.” — www.calweb.com/~laredo/parlproc.htm Parliamentary procedure. Sound complicated? Controlling? Boring? Intimidating? Why do we need to know all those rules for conducting a meeting? Why can’t we just run the meetings however we want to? Who cares if we follow parliamentary procedure? How many times have you attended a meeting that ran on and on and didn’t accomplish anything? The meeting jumps from one topic to another without deciding on anything. Group members disrupt the meeting with their own personal agendas. Arguments erupt. A few people make all the decisions and ignore everyone else’s opinions. Everyone leaves the meeting feeling frustrated. Sound familiar? Then a little parliamentary procedure may just be the thing to turn your unproductive, frustrating meetings into a thing of beauty — or at least make them more enjoyable and productive. What is Parliamentary Procedure? Parliamentary procedure is a set of well proven rules designed to move business along in a meeting while maintaining order and controlling the communications process. Its purpose is to help groups accomplish their tasks through an orderly, democratic process. Parliamentary procedure is not intended to inhibit a meeting with unnecessary rules or to prevent people from expressing their opinions. It is intended to facilitate the smooth func- tioning of the meeting and promote cooperation and harmony among members.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Potential Administration and Congressional Action on ACA Repeal / Replace Legislation; Other Key Dates; and Activities of Tribes1
    Current understanding of proposed -- Timeline of Potential Administration and Congressional Action on ACA Repeal / Replace Legislation; Other Key Dates; and Activities of Tribes1 As of June 22, 2017 This brief provides a timeline on potential / completed congressional, Trump Administration, and Tribal organization actions regarding repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Activities and dates are updated according to ongoing press reports. Congressional / Administration actions appear in black; Tribal organization actions appear in green. Timeline of Potential Administration and Congressional Action on ACA Repeal / Replace Legislation Late 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April/May 2017 June/July 2017 August 2017 1/4 1/27 2/21 3/9 3/17 5/4 6/22 11/8 12/20 1/3 1/9-1/13 1/23 2/10 3/8 3/15 3/24 4/28 5/21 6/21 6/29 7/28 8/15 Election of TSGAC signs on Stated dates for IHS issues letter House E&C and House Republicans (Tentative) due date House/Senate President- to Tribal Senate/House to identifying W&M Com. withdraw (2c) ACA for first status report conference to Elect Trump request to vote (1b) on exclusions from introduce and repeal bill prior to in House GOP lawsuit combine bills; GOP retain IHCIA budget resolution federal employee approve (2a) ACA vote seeking to end CSRs plans to hold votes hiring freeze repeal bill (3c) on ACA repeal bill pre-August Trump imposes Appeal proceedings resume in Federal Federal spending (Revised) due date recess federal employee House GOP lawsuit seeking to debt limit authority for
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Procedures at a Glance
    Parliamentary Procedures at a Glance To Do This (1) You Say This: May You Must You Be Is the Motion Is the Motion What Vote is Interrupt the Seconded? Debatable? Amendable? Required? Speaker? Adjourn the meeting “I move that we May not interrupt (before all business is Must be seconded Not debatable Not amendable Majority vote required adjourn.” Speaker complete). “I move that we recess May not interrupt Recess the meeting Must be seconded Not debatable Amendable Majority vote required until ...” Speaker Complain about noise, room temperature, etc. “Point of Privilege” May interrupt Speaker No second needed Not debatable (2) Not amendable No vote required (3) Suspend further May not interrupt consideration of “I move we table it.” Must be seconded Not debatable Not amendable Majority vote required Speaker something End debate “I move the May not interrupt Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Two-thirds Postpone consideration “I move we postpone May not interrupt Two-thirds vote Must be seconded Debatable Amendable of something this matter until...” Speaker required Have something “I move we refer this May not interrupt Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Majority vote required studied further to a committee Speaker “I move that this May not interrupt Amend a motion motion be amended Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Majority vote required Speaker by...” Introduce business (a May not interrupt Majority vote “I move that...” Must be seconded Debatable Amendable primary motion) Speaker Required 1. These motions or points are listed in established order of precedence. When any one of them is pending, you may not introduce another that’s listed below it.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Process Lpbooklet 2016 15Th Edition.Qxp Booklet00-01 12Th Edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 1
    LPBkltCvr_2016_15th edition-1.qxp_BkltCvr00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 2:49 PM Page 1 South Carolina’s Legislative Process LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 1 THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 2 October 2016 15th Edition LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 3 THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS The contents of this pamphlet consist of South Carolina’s Legislative Process , pub - lished by Charles F. Reid, Clerk of the South Carolina House of Representatives. The material is reproduced with permission. LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 4 LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 5 South Carolina’s Legislative Process HISTORY o understand the legislative process, it is nec - Tessary to know a few facts about the lawmak - ing body. The South Carolina Legislature consists of two bodies—the Senate and the House of Rep - resentatives. There are 170 members—46 Sena - tors and 124 Representatives representing dis tricts based on population. When these two bodies are referred to collectively, the Senate and House are together called the General Assembly. To be eligible to be a Representative, a person must be at least 21 years old, and Senators must be at least 25 years old. Members of the House serve for two years; Senators serve for four years. The terms of office begin on the Monday following the General Election which is held in even num - bered years on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
    [Show full text]
  • December 7, 2016 the Honorable Paul Ryan Speaker, U.S. House H
    December 7, 2016 The Honorable Paul Ryan The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker, U.S. House Democratic Leader, U.S. House H-232 Capitol Building H-204 Capitol Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Re: Consequences of Repealing ACA Provisions or Ending Cost-Sharing Reduction Reimbursements Dear Speaker Ryan and Leader Pelosi: With plans for repeal of all or part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reportedly being prioritized for action early in the 115th Congress, the American Academy of Actuaries’1 Health Practice Council urges you to consider the potential adverse consequences of repealing provisions of the ACA, such as the individual mandate and enrollee subsidies, without also enacting a replacement approach at the same time. Repealing major provisions of the ACA would raise immediate concerns that individual market enrollment would decline, causing the risk pools to deteriorate and premiums to become less affordable. Even if the effective date of a repeal is delayed, the threat of a deterioration of the risk pool could lead additional insurers to reconsider their participation in the individual market. Likewise, eliminating the reimbursements to insurers for cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies could result in insurer losses and solvency challenges, leading insurers to further consider withdrawing from the market. In either case, significant market disruption could result, leading to millions of Americans losing their health insurance. Offering pre-existing condition protections requires incentives for enrollment A sustainable health insurance market depends on enrolling enough healthy people over which the costs of the less healthy people can be spread. To ensure viability when there is a guarantee that consumers with pre-existing conditions can obtain health insurance coverage at standard rates requires mechanisms to spread the cost of that guarantee over a broad population.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California Office of Administrative Law
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW In re: ) ) DECISION REGARDING AGENCY: STATE BOARD OF ) DISAPPROVAL OF A EDUCATION ) CHANGE WITHOUT ) REGULATORY EFFECT ) (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, RULEMAKING ACTION: ) sec. 100) Repeal sections 303, 304, and 352 ) of title 5 of the California Code of ) OAL File No. 05-0308-01N Regulations ) PROPOSED CHANGE WITHOUT REGULATORY EFFECT The State Board of Education (Board) proposes to repeal as changes without regulatory effect the following three regulations, which were adopted in 1969. Rule 303 provides: “A pupil may not leave the school premises at recess, or at any other time before the regular hour for closing school, except in case of emergency, or with the approval of the principal of the school.” Rule 304 provides: “Every pupil shall leave the schoolroom at recess unless it would occasion an exposure of health.” Rule 352 provides: “A pupil shall not be required to remain in school during the intermission at noon, or during any recess.” SUMMARY OF DECISION On April 19, 2005, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) disapproved the above-referenced proposed change without regulatory effect. The reasons for the disapproval are summarized here and explained in detail below. The Board has not demonstrated that the proposed changes would “not materially alter any requirement, right, responsibility, condition, prescription, or other regulatory element of any California Code of Regulations provision,” as is required by California Code of Regulations, title 1, section 100. DISCUSSION A state agency may make changes without regulatory effect to the California Code of Regulations using the procedure set out in section 100 of title 1 of the California Code of regulations.1 That procedure requires the agency to demonstrate to OAL that the change “does 1 California Code of Regulations, tit.
    [Show full text]
  • House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent Issues Will Get Dedicated Attention in New Committees
    OFFICE OF THE HOUSE SPEAKER 900 Court St., N.E., Room H-269 Salem OR 97301 http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/kotek NEWS RELEASE December 31, 2020 Danny Moran, 503-986-1204 [email protected] House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent issues will get dedicated attention in new committees SALEM – Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek on Thursday announced House committees for the 2021 Legislative Session. In addition to the standard policy and budget committees, the Oregon House of Representatives will have new committees in the upcoming session to address timely issues, including wildfire recovery, redistricting, institutional reform of the Legislature, as well as subcommittees focusing on COVID-19 response, equitable policing and the return of a policy committee dedicated to early childhood issues. “Oregonians are facing crises that demand urgent action. The House is ready to lead on the issues that matter most in people’s lives right now. We also need to create the space to have a focused conversation about long-term, transformational changes to modernize the people’s legislature,” Speaker Kotek said. “I’m grateful for the diverse perspectives that my colleagues will bring as we all work together to help Oregonians navigate the big challenges that lie ahead.” Speaker Kotek communicated directly with every returning and new member of the Oregon House of Representatives before deciding on committee assignments, taking the time to weigh and discuss their priorities, interests and notable experience. She also consulted with both caucus leaders before finalizing the assignments. The House will convene on Monday, January 11 to swear in members.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Parliamentary Procedure
    Common Parliamentary Procedure 1. To obtain the floor, speaker should: 6. To consider an action, speaker should: a. wait until the previous speaker has finished a. state: “I move that we reconsider the vote on b. address the chair the motion to (state motion).” c. when recognized, state name and church The motion must be made by one who voted with the d. make statement prevailing side. The motion must be seconded, is debatably, and requires a majority vote. 2. To move or amend, speaker should: 7. To rescind an action, speaker should: a. state: “I move that we ______.” or “I move that a. state: “I move that we rescind the motion that we amend the motion by adding/striking/ (state motion).” inserting the words ______.” The motion must be seconded, is debatable, and requires b. wait until motion or amendment has been a two-thirds vote of members present, or majority of seconded and placed before delegation entire membership, unless previous notice has been c. speak to the item given to this particular motion to rescind. Only one amendment to a motion (primary amendment), and one amendment to the motion to amend (secondary 8. To substitute a motion, speaker should: amendment) are in order at one time. a. state: “I move, as a substitute motion, that we (state substitute).” 3. To stop debate, speaker should: This motion must be seconded, is debatably, and requires a. state: “I move the previous question.” a majority vote. If a substitute motion is passed, it simply The motion must be seconded, is not debatable, and becomes the motion before the Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution for Censure James Madison University Faculty Senate May 6, 2021
    Resolution for Censure James Madison University Faculty Senate May 6, 2021 Whereas one of the traditional duties of the Speaker of the Faculty Senate is to attend the quarterly meetings of the JMU Board of Visitors to report to its Academics and Student Life Committee on activities of the Faculty Senate and to update the Committee on issues of concern to the faculty, and Whereas the Faculty Senate places its trust in the Speaker to fairly represent its interests before the Board of Visitors and to reflect views that are held in common by a majority of the faculty, and Whereas at the April 15, 2021, meeting of the BOV Academics and Student Life Committee, Senate Speaker Val Larsen delivered a speech that misrepresented the views of the Faculty Senate, in particular, by making faulty assumptions about the reasons for abstentions on the freedom of speech resolution, and Whereas the result of the freedom of speech resolution was taken out of context, exploited rhetorically, and misinterpreted as signifying deep ideological divisions at JMU, and Whereas the Speaker’s oral presentation was discussed with neither the Senate Steering Committee nor the Provost prior to its delivery, and Whereas the delivery of the Speaker’s oral presentation constitutes a breach of trust of the Faculty Senate and its constituents, and Whereas the claims and ideology expressed in the Speaker’s oral presentation belong primarily to the Speaker and significantly misrepresent and distort the views and beliefs of the faculty senate as a collective, Now therefore be it Resolved that the Faculty Senate issues this Censure for the above- described actions of Speaker Larsen, and directs the Speaker at the next Board of Visitors meeting to read a statement retracting and clarifying the April 15 oral presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Adjournment
    Chapter 1 Adjournment A. GENERALLY; ADJOURNMENTS OF THREE DAYS OR LESS § 1. In General § 2. Adjournment Motions and Requests; Forms § 3. When in Order; Precedence and Privilege of Motion § 4. In Committee of the Whole § 5. Who May Offer Motion; Recognition § 6. Debate on Motion; Amendments § 7. Voting § 8. Quorum Requirements § 9. Dilatory Motions; Repetition of Motion B. ADJOURNMENTS FOR MORE THAN THREE DAYS § 10. In General; Resolutions § 11. Privilege of Resolution § 12. August Recess C. ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE § 13. In General; Resolutions § 14. Procedure at Adjournment; Motions Research References U.S. Const. art. I, § 5 5 Hinds §§ 5359–5388 8 Cannon §§ 2641–2648 Manual §§ 82–84, 911–913 1 VerDate 29-JUL-99 20:28 Mar 20, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 2574 Sfmt 2574 C:\PRACTICE\DOCS\MHP.001 PARL1 PsN: PARL1 §1 HOUSE PRACTICE A. Generally; Adjournments of Three Days or Less § 1. In General Types of Adjournments Adjournment procedures in the House are governed by the House rules and by the Constitution. There are: (1) adjournments of three days or less, which are taken pursuant to motion; (2) adjournments of more than three days, which require the consent of the Senate (§ 10, infra); and (3) adjourn- ments sine die, which end each session of a Congress and which require the consent of both Houses. Adjournments of more than three days or sine die are taken pursuant to concurrent resolutions. §§ 10, 13, infra. Adjournment Versus Recess Adjournment is to be distinguished from recess. The House may author- ize a recess under a motion provided in rule XVI clause 4.
    [Show full text]