Life on the Edge: the Eastern Screech-Owl in Winnipeg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life on the Edge: the Eastern Screech-Owl in Winnipeg Life on the Edge: The Eastern screech-owl in winnipeg by Chdstian Artuso A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilmenf of the requirerrents of the degee of Doctor of Philosophy Departrrrnt of Environment and Geography University of Manitoba Winnþeg copyright @ 2w by christian Arhso THE UNIVERSITY OF' MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ,! rl *,r * COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Life on the Edge: The Eastern Screech_Owl in Winnipeg BY Christian Artuso A ThesisÆracticum submitted to the F'acurty of Graduate studies of The university of Manitoba in partial fulfirment of the requirement of the degree of Doctor of philosophy Christian Artuso @ 2009 Permission has been granted to the university rhesis/pracricum,ro of Manitob¿ I.ibraries urrary anå to rend a copy of this thesis/pracricum, all¡y., c"""äîoAc) and ro ;-"î, ruqlæ*a;;) ro lend a copy of rhis publishHt; microfirm, se, copies an absrract of this ,iÀirlp"u.ticum." and ro This reproduction or copy of this copyright thesis has been made available owner sorery f9; th"pu"p*e by authorify of the reproduced of privat" rrr;;;od research, and copied ur p""-üt.d;;^;;;;,;;;í"*, uoJ_uy only be authorization or wirh express wrirúen from rh, .ånñËü owner. ABSTRACT cavity-nesting birds may be sensitive to urbanization due to changes in the availability of breedingresources. Nonetheless, the EasternScreech-owlhas higherproductivityand survival in suburbs than rural areas in the southern portion of its range (Texas). Densities and life-history haits of birds nray differ in range peripheral areas, rendering generalization aborf the effect of urbanization difficult. I examined the population density, reproductioq habitat selectioq and diet of Eastern Screech-owls in Manitoba to test whether the patterns observed in Texas held at the northernperþhery of the range, and whether such patterns would be npre or less pronounced. I conducted a random- sftatified survey across a rural to urban gradient and monitored nests in natural cavities and nest boxes' I collected data on diet and measwed variables related to the cavity tree and at the habitat level at nests and unused cavities. Eastern Screech-owl dersity was positively correlated with human density, peaking in medium to high-density suburbs. Screech-owls preferred rþarian habitat brt densities and breeding in residential areas versus greenspace did not differ. Brood sizes peaked in suburban areas' where fledging averaged five days in advance of rt¡ral areas. owls selected habitat where canopy cover was relatively high, and with sufficient potential nest-sites close to some coniferous ffees. They selected nest sites in taller ftees, closer to water and with lower slÏub density below the nest than unused cavities. They avoided potential nest sites with npre buildings and higher domestic cat activity. Screech-owls had a more diverse diet with nrore vertebrate prey in low-derxity suburban areas as opposed to rtnal and high-dersity suburban areas. The rrpchanisms behind this pattern lt appear to be the urban heat island, redrrced predation, greater diversity of prey, and favorable habitat alteration including planted conifers and buildings for roosting and Írore open vegetation The percentage of rufor,rs morph screech-owls in Manitoba has fallen from 6- lIVo nthe 1920s to <I7o today, whereas no decline has occurred in Miruresota or North Dakota. I argue that, based on differences in swvival rates between color nnrplu in exteme cold, this is evidence of a northward range expansion facilitated by the anthropogenic influences noted above. The differences in density, reproductivity, and breeding phenology between suburban and ruralareas, as well as the nechanisms involved, are similar to those found in Texas, suggesting that" at least in this case, the influence of urbannation is not strongly mitigated by latitude. lll ACKNO\ryLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my funding sources: The University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowshþ, The Special Conservation Fund of Manitoba Conservatior¡ Manitoba Hydro, The Winnipeg Foundation, and the Great Gray Owl Fund administered by R. W. Nero, as well as a kind donationby Pat Cooper. I wish to thark the members of my committee, Merlin w. Shoesmith Richard K. Baydack, James R. Duncar¡ Nicola Koper for their sìryport and guidance tluoughor.ú the degee process. I also thank other faculty rnembers of the University of Manitoba whose instruction and assistarrce have been invaluable to me including Stéphane Mcl-achlaq Spenser G. Sealy, David Walker, and James F. Hare. These chapteri were greatly improved by the thoughtful comments of Richard K. Baydack, Robert P. Berger, Brigitte De March, I¿ny De March Janes R. Duncan, John M. Eadie, Frederick R. GehhacL C. stuart Houston, Karla Kinstler, Nbola Koper, Erkki Korpim?iki Robert w. Nero, Spenser G. Sealy, Peter Taylor, Merlin W. Shoesmith, and various anonyrrlous reviewers. I thank Brigitte De March Nbola Koper, and DaviC Walker for their heip with the various statistical applicatiors u,sed. I thank Robert P. Berger, Jarres R. Duncar¡ Teny Galloway, Randy Mòoi, Justin Rasmusser¡ Rob Roughty, ãnd speruer G. sealy for assistance in identifying prey remains. I am grateful to Dale Marciski the Outreach Officer at the Meteorological Service of Environment Canada, for his assistance in gathering c limate data. The following people sr¡bmitted observations of Eastern Screech-Owl and Great Horned Owl in Manitoba, particþated by listening for owls in their area, conftibrfed sight records for the historical database (even indirectly, e.g. by taking birds found injured to rehabilitation), heþed collecting pellets, helped to monitor roost sites, gave nre permission to enter their property, or otherwise assisted ne in various aspects of fieldwork or preparing rnanuscripts. I thank themall immensely: Linda Anderson" Nancy Andersor¡ læslie Andrews, Nadine Andrusiak, Terry Angus, Alfred Aug, Ron Arstiru Melissa Baer, Ken Baker, David Barnes, Pat Bar¡res, Mary Barrett, Derek Bartray, Nathalie Bays, Barny Beaulier¡ Krnt Beltor¡ [æane Beltor¡ Gloria Benhenl Keith Bersor¡ KeithBensoq Ballie Berger, Herry Berger, RonBerglund, Jim Bertwhistle, Patty Best, Brad Bird, Marcia Blair, Muray Blair, Luc Blanchette, Frank Boilear¡ Jim Boult, Chris Boumford, DaviC Bowles, Erl Braater¡ Jarres Bradley, Joy Bradley, Louise Brisebois, Jack Brown, Paul Buchanan, Bill Buhler, GaryBudyck, GregBuzza, ri- Byers, Alisoncanpbell, Kevincampbell, Brad carey, Læslie carignan, Brendan Camrthers, Silvio E. Cascino, Michelle Caughy, David Chevalier, DanCluanowski, phil Christiarso4 Ward Clristiansor¡ Dave Christie, John Christie, Jamie Chuback, Ed chudrick, Redmond Clarke, steve clubb, Michael cobus, colinCornad, Kyle conrad, Michael cornad, Pat cooper, Andy courcelles, [æa craig, Jack crolly, John cunningham, charles curtis, cal cuthbert Edgar Dandridge, Steve Davidge, Rob de Graaf, Brigitte De March, t-any de Marctr, chris De Ruyck, Ben DeBeer, Angel Delorme, Steve Demmings, KenDe smet, Paul Desrosiers, Nick Devine, wilbewit, Jeddich Doerksen, Cindy Dowse, Ronald Dueck, James R. Duncan, patsy Duncan, Alvin Dyck, Bill Eaton, Estelle Eaton, Kyle Elliott, Richard Ellis, Adolf Ens, Iiristen Eriksor¡ iv Dennis Fast, DebiForlanski, MargaretFrederikso4 PaulFrieser¡ MaureenFrolick, Barbara fuller, Vern Gaddows, Ian Gagnor¡ Wendy Garson" Corinna Gascho, Margaret Gibson, Randy Giesbrech Doreen Gbsbrecht, Mary Giesbrecht, Marlene Gifford, Mfte Gigiaa Ed Gilroy Micheline Girard, Miles Goolie, Paul Goossen, Gordon Grieef, Jaye Grieef, Paula Grieef, Susan Grieef, Jim Gyselinck, Keith Hamblin, Cary Harrel, Derrick Hanpton, I¿vin Hanke, Hao He, Bob Hart, David Hatch Jerry Hayes, iohnHays, CarolynHerrxandez, Ruth Hiebert, Jeff Higdon, Chris Higgs, tæane Hill, Heather Hinant Frank Hinings, Debbie Hobbs, Janice Hobbs, George Holland, Jean Hortoq Ray lversorL Jang Byoung-Soon, Liesel Janssor¡ Reinhard Janssón, Maricia Johrnon, paul Jones, Bernice Kennedy, Janet Kennedy, Fawad Khan, Mark King Sally King Todd King, Janis Klapecki, l-orne Klasser¡ Rudolf Koes, Hilton Kotyk, Brenäa Krõeker, Roy Laham, Linda r-ahzm, Heather I¿ild, Bill t apuck, Georgina Larsoq Raynnnd l¿rsorl Betty I¿vender, Anne tayma+ læw Layrnarq Kathleen læathers, yun-Kyoung Iæe, Gladys rngal Nick læone, sid læverick, Michael Iæwyc, pat Iæwyc, Li chunxiao, cory Lindgre4 Alain l-ouer, DeanMacDonald, Frank Machovec, Irene Magnesor¡ Nia Massey, Brenda Maxwell, christian McBride, Les Mccanr¡ Hope MJGaha, stephane Mcl-achlan, Ted Mcl¿chlan, Ardylle McMaster, DanMcMaster, GlenMcMaster, Laura McMaster, DeanMedeiros, Sarah Medill, Norm Melnychuk, GwenMewendorss, Al Mickey, Don Middletor¡ Kim Middleton, Corey Millar, Lucille Miller, Marthat Moffat, R. Moodie, Fred Mooi, Randy Mooi Janet Moore,LuMorash lan Morrow, John Murray, 'wayne Joan Murray, Shirley Murray, Gwen Mwenendorf, p. Neilly, John Neils, Robert w. Nero, Darrel Neufeld, Hany Neufeld, t ori Nichols, Robb Nichoí1, Kevin Nixon, Bruce Norvey, George Nykureik, Gerry oliver, cheryl orr, phil ould, Rachel parsons, Pantear¡ Brian Parkers, Robert Terry pastrick, Freðpawlyszyq Monica Pazernitlk, Linda Pearr¡ Carole Penner, Jake. E. Peters, Jennifer páloct, Barry pomeroy, Ryan Porteous, Angelé Pradaehi, procner, prouse, s usan Gordon Mike e uigley, Justin Rasmusser¡ Jacklyn Regeþ Don Reimer, Mary Reimer, Elvira Roberge-, aïúer Robinson, Robert RobirÌsoq Rong Rong Sheni Routly, Alex Sardersor¡ Chris Sands, Linda Sands' Linda Scarrow, Wayne Scarrow, Allan Scarth, Al Schirtt, Dorothy
Recommended publications
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Screech-Owl (Otus Asio)
    Wild Things in Your Woodlands Eastern Screech-Owl (Otus asio) The Eastern Screech-Owl is a small, nocturnal, predatory bird, about 8.5 inches in size. The robin-sized owl has short, rounded wings, bright yellow eyes, and a rounded head with visible “ear tufts.” The ear tufts, which the bird raises when alarmed, are otherwise inconspicuous. The facial disc is lightly mottled and has a prominent dark rim along the sides. The tail and the flight feathers of the wings are barred. The eastern screech-owl occurs in two color morphs, red and gray. The red color morph is more common near the coast, and the grey color morph is more common in the interior of the state. Male and female screech owls look alike. In the fall, light and temperature conditions mimic those of spring, and birds and amphibians sometimes begin calling again, a behavior called autumnal recrudescence. At this time, the screech owl’s tremulous call can be heard in a variety of habitats including open woodlands, deciduous forests, parks, farms, riparian areas, swamps, old orchards, small woodlots, and suburban areas. This small owl is an often common, nocturnal bird in much of New York State, though it is uncommon in heavily forested regions, at high elevations, and on Long Island. The screech owl is a year-round resident, spending both the breeding and non-breeding seasons in the same area. The screech owl nests in natural hollows or cavities in trees, old woodpecker holes, nesting boxes, and occasionally crevices in the sides of buildings. Screech owl pairs may roost together in the same tree cavity during the day throughout the breeding season.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptor Mews: Meet Our Birds
    Raptor Mews: Meet our Birds Birds of Prey or “Raptors” are birds with hooked beaks and sharp talons that are strict carnivores: they only eat other animals in order to survive. Hashawha houses several raptor species at the Raptor Mews. These have been evaluated and deemed non-releasable by veterinarians and rehabbers. They are part of our educational programs at Bear Branch Nature Center and Outdoor School. Eastern Screech Owl Otus asio Eastern Screech Owls are the smallest species of owl found in Carroll County. Their color pattern can vary from bright red to gray. The strong patterns on the belly and back, as well as the ear tufts, allow them to blend in with their environment, making it easier to hunt for prey and hide from predators. Though they are predators, they frequently fall prey to larger owl species themselves. Barred Owl Strix varia Also known as ‘Swamp Owls’, Barred Owls can be found mainly in hardwood marsh areas. They are mostly nocturnal, and usually like to hunt at night. However, it is not uncommon to see one in the late afternoon, getting a jump on the day’s hunting. They will eat a variety of prey, including mice, frogs, and even crayfish! Barred Owls have a very distinct call. If you listen closely, it sounds like they are asking a question: “Who cooks for you, who cooks for you all?” Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus These ‘tigers of the night’ are amazing creatures. Great Horned Owls are the top predator in the woods at night. They are extremely powerful and able to carry much larger prey in relation to their body size then other birds of prey.
    [Show full text]
  • OWLS of OHIO C D G U I D E B O O K DIVISION of WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O
    OWLS OF OHIO c d g u i d e b o o k DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O Owls have longowls evoked curiosity in In the winter of of 2002, a snowy ohio owl and stygian owl are known from one people, due to their secretive and often frequented an area near Wilmington and two Texas records, respectively. nocturnal habits, fierce predatory in Clinton County, and became quite Another, the Oriental scops-owl, is behavior, and interesting appearance. a celebrity. She was visited by scores of known from two Alaska records). On Many people might be surprised by people – many whom had never seen a global scale, there are 27 genera of how common owls are; it just takes a one of these Arctic visitors – and was owls in two families, comprising a total bit of knowledge and searching to find featured in many newspapers and TV of 215 species. them. The effort is worthwhile, as news shows. A massive invasion of In Ohio and abroad, there is great owls are among our most fascinating northern owls – boreal, great gray, and variation among owls. The largest birds, both to watch and to hear. Owls Northern hawk owl – into Minnesota species in the world is the great gray are also among our most charismatic during the winter of 2004-05 became owl of North America. It is nearly three birds, and reading about species with a major source of ecotourism for the feet long with a wingspan of almost 4 names like fearful owl, barking owl, North Star State.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Profile: Eastern Screech-Owl
    Species Profile: Eastern Screech-Owl (Or: All you wanted to know about our screech-owls but were afraid to ask) by Jack Eitniear This article first appeared in the February 2006 issue of the San Antonio Audubon Society newsletter. The Eastern Screech-Owl (Megascops asio) occurs through the eastern threequarters of the state. The owl is often the only resident avian predator of suburban woodlots and often will nest in nestboxes. The owl is unusual in that it comes in two distinctive color morphs: rufous and gray. Many people are not aware that screech-owls are monogamous and polygynous, living in groups of similarly-aged birds within a small territory that contains a number of nestsites. Nesting from March until June, the adults feed their 3-4 young on a wide variety of prey items, which facilitates their being adaptable to a variety of wooded habitats near or within towns. I should mention that in west Texas we have the Western Screech-Owl (M. kennicottii), which has a descending call, yellowish bill, and in some individuals, more rufous coloration. Encouraging the breeding of screechowls in your area is often achieved by correctly sized and positioned nest-boxes. According to screech-owl authority, Texan Fred Gehlbach, nest-boxes can be made of any wood at least 2 cm thick. The floor should be 18 x 18 cm with a few (.5 cm) drain holes in the bottom corners. The entrance hole should be 7 cm in diameter and placed 25 cm from the floor. Fred suggests a front sloping lid 5 cm from the entrance hole with 3 cm overhanging and hinged at the back.
    [Show full text]
  • Owls of Montana Sounds
    Owls of Montana Sounds Birds communicate verbally to one another for many different reasons. Songs, used typically to establish territories and for finding a mate, are learned over time by the male and occasionally female. Calls can be heard in all seasons and are more instinctive. For more information about bird sounds and what they mean, visit audubon.org . Working from the smallest Montana species to the largest: The Northern Pygmy-Owl These tiny but fierce predators have a specific sound for the different regions that they live in. Northern Pygmy-Owls in Montana are going to call differently than the ones in Oregon so depending on where you are hearing them, they could be slightly altered. The owls in MT have a song that is a series of high, hollow “toot”s spaced about 4 seconds apart. Males and females will sometimes sing simultaneously and the females will usually have a slightly higher pitch. © Connor Stefanison Photography Their call is a rapid, high-pitched, short trill that is typically after their song. To hear their sounds visit online allaboutbirds.org . Second smallest owl species in Montana: The Flammulated Owl These Owls are spread out through out the western side of the United States and Central America so their sounds are fairly uniform through out their range. The male’s song is a low monotonous “hoot” that it can repeat unendingly. The low hoot will be occasionally Followed by a ‘bull frog’ like lower, two-”hoot” trill. Their alarm calls sound like a high pitch trumpet, two in a row with a second in between each.
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Hornbill
    EASTERN SCREECH OWL Common Names: Common screech owl, gray owl, little cat owl, little gray owl, little horned owl, mottled owl, red owl, shivering owl, whickering owl, ghost owl, dusk owl, spirit owl, mouse owl. Order: Strigiformes Family: Strigidae (typical owls) Subfamily: Striginae Latin Name: Megascops asio, formerly known as Otus asio (from Latin meaning “a kind of horned owl”) Habitat and Range: Open deciduous woods, wood lots, suburban areas, lakeshores, old orchards; southeastern Saskatchewan, east along the Canadian border to New England, along the east coast to Florida, along the eastern foothills of the Rocky Mountains to central Texas and eastern Mexico. They are never found far from trees. Description: Small, mottled owl with large rounded head and prominent ear tufts; yellow eyes. Two color phases occur: gray and rufus, as well as brownish intermediates. Adult Size): 7-10” long, wingspan 18-24”; considerable variation in wt.: males 3-6+ ounces., females 3-7 + ounces. It is the smallest owl with ear tufts in the eastern United States. Diet in the Wild: Largely mice, shrews, and all types of insects. It will take songbirds, other small mammals (including bats), amphibians, small fish (wading right into shallow water to capture them), other arthropods (spiders, scorpions, millipedes, and crayfish), snails, earthworms, and reptiles. In spite of their small size, screech owls are exceptional hunters. They occasionally take ruffed grouse and large rats. Insects are caught in the beak in midair; other prey items are captured with the talons. They have been known to fish through holes in ice that were left by other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big World of Small Owls
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SENIOR RESOURCE ACTIVITY SHEET 6 THE BIG WORLD OF SMALL OWLS Introduction: This activity will discuss a few owl species that are small by nature (small as adults). Four owl species will be covered: elf owl, northern saw-whet owl, eastern screech owl, and boreal owl. Size of Owls: (Sizes of owls taken from Birding World article and Lawrence, Long, and Angell books; see Resources) The Great Horned Owl, one of the largest owls, is 18- Northern Saw-whet Owl, Courtesy of Missouri 25 inches in length. In contrast, the Elf Owl is the Department of Conservation smallest owl in the world at 5-6 inches in length. The The lives in the southwest United States, Northern Saw-whet Owl, the smallest in Ohio, is 6 ½-8 Elf Owl southeast and Baja California, and northern and inches in length. The Eastern Screech Owl, the most central Mexico. It has yellow eyes, whitish common owl in Ohio, is 7-10 inches long, and the eyebrows, and no ear tufts. It is nocturnal and Boreal Owl is 8 ½-12 ½ inches in length. migratory, eats insects, and nests in holes made by woodpeckers in saguaro cacti and trees. Great Horned Owl, Photo by Tom Koerner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Elf Owl, Courtesy of the artist, Mimi Hoppe Wolf, and the Texas Breeding Bird Atlas project, Texas A&M University, College Station Four Small Owls: The Northern Saw-whet Owl lives in the Northern The Eastern Screech Owl lives in southern and United States, Southern Canada, Alaska, Western southeast Canada, the United States, and into United States to Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Screech- Mountain Region
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service Rocky for the Eastern Screech- Mountain Region Black Hills Owl in the Black Hills National Forest Custer, National Forest, South South Dakota December 2002 Dakota and Wyoming Aran S. Johnson and Stanley H. Anderson Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Screech-Owl in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming. Aran S. Johnson and Stanley H. Anderson Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Wyoming P.O. Box 3166 Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Aran S. Johnson is a Research Scientist in the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Wyoming. He received his B.S. in 1995 at the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay and his M.S. in 2001 at the University of Wyoming. His master’s project investigated logging effects on riparian and upland songbird species. Raptor projects that Aran has been involved with have included studies on Northern Harriers, American Kestrels, Northern Goshawks, Golden Eagles, Ferruginous Hawks, and Burrowing Owls. Stanley H. Anderson is the leader of the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. He received his Ph.D. from Oregon State University in 1970 and his B.S. from the University of Redlands in 1961. During his career at Kenyon College, Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Patuxent Research Center and the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit he has worked extensively on wildlife habitat, publishing as author or co-author more than 230 scientific articles. Stan has done extensive work on raptors throughout the United States, South America, and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Superior Raptor Monitoring 2020 Summary
    Town of Superior Raptor Monitoring 2020 Summary Red-tailed Hawk with nestlings Sponsored by the Open Space Advisory Committee Introduction: 2019-2020 marked the second full session of a raptor monitoring program sponsored by the Town of Superior’s Open Space Advisory Committee. The program has several goals: determining what raptor species are present in Superior, learning what areas raptors use at different times of the year, monitoring any nesting activity, working to prevent unnecessary disturbance to raptors, identifying habitats to protect, and providing relevant education to the Town’s residents. Twelve volunteer observers, all Superior residents, monitored ten general locations approximately weekly between early winter and late summer. They identified 14 species of raptors, including eagles, falcons, hawks, and owls. Some of these species use open spaces in Superior only intermittently, for hunting or migration. However, monitors determined that four species nested in or adjacent to Superior in 2020; 14 nests were located and all but one of them produced fledglings. The nesting species were Great Horned Owl, Red-tailed Hawk, Cooper’s Hawk, and American Kestrel. These four raptors are well known for being able to adapt to living near humans and to reproduce successfully in a suburban environment. Methods and Results: Volunteer observers received orientation training, monitored designated areas regularly between early winter and late summer, and submitted observation reports to the project coordinator. If courtship activity or a
    [Show full text]
  • Owls Wildlife Note
    8. Owls Owls are birds of prey, occupying by night the hunting and feeding niches which the hawks hold by day. Superb, specialized predators, owls are adapted to find, catch and kill prey quickly and efficiently. They’ve been doing it for ages; owl fossils found in the Midwestern United States in rocks of the Eocene period date back about 60 million years. Eight species of owls either nest or regularly visit Pennsylvania in winter. Some species like the great horned owl, barred owl, and Eastern screech-owl are permanent residents. Barn owls, long-eared owls, short-eared owls, and northern saw-whet owls nest in the state but are migratory. Some individuals apparently nest where they spent the winter. Snowy owls are winter visitors, varying each year in the extent of their visitation to the state. Migrant owl populations seem to reflect the abundance of prey populations, so they vary greatly from year to year. In general, the populations of owls are not well-known because of their nocturnal habits. As such, these are among Pennsylvania’s most mysterious birds and deserve more research and monitoring efforts. Taxonomists divide owls (order Strigiformes) into two Eastern screech-owl families, Tytonidae­­­—barn owls—and Strigidae, a family to which all other Pennsylvania owls belong. The barn vision: each eye views the same scene from a slightly owl ranges over most of the world, with related species different angle, thus improving depth perception. Eyes are in South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, New Zealand, and fixed in the skull; to look to the side, an owl moves its head, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Screech-Owl (Megascops Asio) Thomas Carpenter
    Eastern Screech-Owl (Megascops asio) Thomas Carpenter Bay County, MI © Joe Soehnel (View Comparison of Atlas I & II) Unique among Michigan owls because of its The ecological tension zone between the two color morphs (red and gray), the Eastern southern oak-hickory/beech-maple forest and Screech-Owl is a ubiquitous denizen of the the northern mixed coniferous forest also small woodlots that typify the southern LP. As characterizes the northern boundary (Shea implied by its name, it occurs east of the Rocky 2006). Mountains north to southeast Saskatchewan, west central Montana and the southern borders Differences in distribution between MBBA I of Quebec and Manitoba (Adam 1987). The and MBBA II were minor. More townships had southern portion of its range extends into confirmed breeding during MBBA I. MBBA II northeast Mexico, and from west Texas east to established more records for Sanilac County and the Atlantic Ocean (Gehlbach 1995). In documented possible or probable breeding Michigan, Eastern Screech-Owls are common in status in three counties without records during the southern LP and uncommon in the northern MBBA I (Alpena, Oscoda and Muskegon). In LP. the southern LP, both atlases show a preponderance of records in the southeast and Distribution southwest. These differences probably reflect Prior to European settlement, Eastern Screech- variations in coverage rather than an actual Owls were likely uncommon. As settlers change in distribution. Confirmed breeding was cleared away the forest, the owls apparently documented north to Montmorency and Antrim flourished. They were considered abundant by Counties, with probable breeding in Emmet the beginning of the 20th century (Barrows County during MBBA I.
    [Show full text]