DOCSLIB.ORG

LANDSCAPING with NATIVE PLANTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WEST TENNESSEE WEST TENNESSEE Mississippi Alluvial Plain, Coastal Plain, Mississippi Alluvial Plain, Coastal Plain, and West Tennessee Uplands and West Tennessee Uplands West Tennessee comprises the Mississippi Alluvial Plain, Coastal Plain, and West Tennessee Uplands. This region is often referred to as the Gulf Coastal Plain because it was submerged between 40-70 million years ago by the Gulf Coastal Embayment. Site conditions within the region are determined by topography, soil pH, soil depth, aspect, availability of light, and hydrology. These site con- ditions support a mosaic of native plant communities. ➤ Inundated tupelo, cypress-tupelo, and scrub-shrub swamps. ➤ Oak dominated alluvial bottomland hardwood forests. ➤ Mixed mesophytic forests on slopes and ravines char- acteristic of the Chickasaw Bluffs. ➤ Open canopy forests associated with warm season grass barrens. ➤ Upland oak-hickory forests ranging from basic soil types to heath-shrub dominated types. Mississippi Alluvial Plain Coastal Plain LAKE OBION WEAKLEY HENRY West Tennessee Uplands DYER BENTON GIBSON CARROLL CROCKETT LAUDERDALE HENDERSON HAYWOOD MADISON TIPTON DECATUR CHESTER SHELBY FAYETTE HARDEMAN MCNAIRY HARDIN The Mississippi Alluvial Plain is the river floodplain com - posed of unconsolidated sediment from as far away as the eastern slopes of the Rockies to the western slopes of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Hydric soil occurs in the flood- plains along all the major rivers that drain the Gulf Coastal Plain. A fine particled clayey gumbo interspersed with LANDSCAPING sandy soils occurs along the Mississippi, while a friable silty loam occurs along smaller rivers, streams, and creeks. WITH The Coastal Plain is a gentle sloping plateau that begins where the Chickasaw Bluffs rise above the Mississippi NATIVE Alluvial Plain and extends to the West Tennessee Up- lands. The Coastal Plain is formed from finely ground wind-blown loess material derived from retreating PLANTS northern glaciers. The flat to rolling topography is caused by the wind-blown loess that covers the sand, PROMOTES BIODIVERSITY silt, and clay deposited by the Coastal Embayment. The West Tennessee Uplands is formed from the sand, and endorses a land ethic that silt, and clay deposits that underlay the Mississippi Al- celebrates our natural heritage luvial Plain and the Coastal Plain. Soils vary from clay to sandy. The site conditions of the Western Valley, contigu- ous to the West Tennessee Uplands, are similar to the Western Highland Rim of Middle Tennessee. Our natural heritage Natives vs. exotics The use of native plants in landscaping is a celebration While many exotics are harmless, others pose serious of our natural heritage and an awakening of a land ethic threats to biodiversity. Exotics that escape and natural- first expressed by Aldo Leopold more than 50 years ago. ize change the floral composition of native plant com- munities. Exotics that invade native plant communities The natural processes from which natives evolve spread, out-compete, and displace natives. Other exot- represent the cog and wheel of a healthy ecosystem sus- ics are vectors for disease and exotic insects. Future tained by a complex web of biological diversity. introductions can be prevented by using native species. Native plants have many inherent qualities and adap- Using natives also exhibits regional flora and pro- tive traits that make them aesthetically pleasing, practi- motes our natural heritage. Natives have often been cal, and ecologically valuable for landscaping. overlooked and their aesthetic value ignored. Instead, Using native plants contributes to the health and often many regions look the same because overuse of the the restoration of an ecosystem. Landscaping with na- same exotics has created a monotonous, predictable tives in an urban setting helps restore regional charac- landscape. ter and places fewer demands on resources. Basics about using natives When landscaping with natives match the right plants with the right site conditions. Consider using plants that occur together in their natural habitats. Do your homework before planting; study the plants and the site con dition information in this brochure. Visit a natural area and observe how plants occur and design your landscape accordingly. Buy nursery propagated plants. Remember, landscaping with natives is art imitating nature. Native Benefits of natives species naturally occurring in a region (indigenous) ➤ Adapted to regional conditions and may require less Exotic maintenance and are cost-effective. ➤ species introduced by humans, either deliberately Hardy, withstand extreme winter cold, do not suffer from die back. or accidentally (alien, non-native) ➤ Environmentally friendly, require fewer pesticides and fertilizers because of natural adaptations. ➤ Promote biodiversity and stewardship. What are natives? ➤ Provide food and shelter for native wildlife. ➤ Restore regional land­­scapes. Natives are plants that evolved in place over geologic ➤ Prevent future exotic introductions. time and are distributed across the landscape largely in response to climatic episodes and adaptation to site conditions related to land formation. Natives for wildlife Using natives in landscaping helps sustain native Natives are generally defined as plants that occurred in butterflies, moths and other beneficial insects; native North America before European settlement. This dis- birds, reptiles, mammals, and other fauna. Fall migrat- tinction is made because of the large-scale changes in ing birds depend on high-energy fruits from flower- the flora that have resulted since European settlement ing dogwood and spicebush. Spring migrants feed on and the introduction of “exotic” plants. insects that occur on oak trees. Beech and other native Exotics are plants that are directly or indirectly, deliber- trees provide nesting habitat, while ately or accidentally introduced by human action. To be Eastern red cedar, short leaf pine, more precise, natives are natural elements of a regional and American holly provide winter landscape. While some species are native to North cover and food. America, they may be exotic to East Tennessee. ➤ Don’t dig plants from the wild. ➤ Buy nursery-propagated plant material. Native plant recommendations LIGHT SOIL MOISTURE SOIL pH K F = full sunlight H = hydric; wet, plants periodically or often inundated by water B = basic; prefers limestone P = partial shade M = mesic; moist, adequate soil moisture retention year-round A = acidic; prefers acidic soils E S = shade S = sub-xeric; moist to dry, seasonally moist, periodically dry R = restricted to either B or A Y X = xeric; dry & drought resistant, little moisture retention, excessively drained COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LIGHT MOISTURE SOIL pH COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LIGHT MOISTURE SOIL pH SHRUBS F P S H M S X B A R TREES F P S H M S X B A R Alder Alnus serrulata ● ● ● ● Red maple Acer rubrum ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Indigobush Amorpha fruticosa ● ● ● ● ● Silver maple Acer saccharinum ● ● ● ● Red chokeberry Aronia arbutifolia ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Sugar maple Acer saccharum ● ● ● ● ● ● Black chokeberry Aronia melanocarpa ● ● ● ● ● ● ● River birch Betula nigra ● ● ● ● ● ● American beautyberry Callicarpa americana ● ● ● ● ● ● Bitternut hickory Carya cordiformis ● ● ● ● ● New Jersey tea Ceanothus americanus ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Pignut hickory Carya glabra ● ● ● ● ● Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis ● ● ● Pecan Carya illinoensis ● ● ● ● Silky dogwood Cornus amomum ● ● ● ● Shagbark hickory Carya ovata ● ● ● ● ● Hazelnut Corylus americana ● ● ● ● ● Mockernut hickory Carya alba ● ● ● ● ● ● Hearts-a-bustin’ Euonymus americanus ● ● ● ● Yellowwood Cladrastis lutea ● ● ● ● ● ● Swamp privet Forestiera acuminata ● ● ● ● Persimmon Diospyros virginiana ● ● ● ● Oakleaf hydrangea Hydrangea quercifolia ● ● ● ● ● American beech Fagus grandifolia ● ● ● ● ● Wild hydrangea Hydrangea arborescens ● ● ● ● ● White ash Fraxinus americana ● ● ● ● ● Shrubby St. John’s Wort Hypericum prolificum ● ● ● ● ● ● Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Deciduous holly Ilex decidua ● ● ● ● Kentucky coffeetree Gymnocladus dioicus ● ● ● ● ● ● Common winterberry Ilex verticillata ● ● ● ● ● ● Red cedar Juniperus virginiana ● ● ● ● ● Virginia willow Itea virginica ● ● ● ● ● Sweet gum Liquidambar styraciflua ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Spicebush Lindera benzoin ● ● ● Red mulberrry Morus rubra ● ● ● ● ● ● Mock orange Philadelphus inodorus ● ● ● ● ● Tupelogum Nyssa aquatica ● ● ● ● ● Wild azalea Rhododendron canescens ● ● ● ● ● ● Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Fragrant sumac Rhus aromatica ● ● ● ● ● ● Virginia pine Pinus virginiania ● ● ● ● Winged sumac Rhus copallina ● ● ● ● Shortleaf pine Pinus echinata ● ● ● ● Carolina rose Rosa carolina ● ● ● ● ● Sycamore Platanus occidentalis ● ● ● ● ● Swamp rose Rosa palustris ● ● ● ● Black cherry Prunus serotina ● ● ● ● ● Elderberry Sambucus canadensis ● ● ● ● ● Eastern cottonwood Populus deltoides ● ● ● ● Bladdernut Staphylea trifolia ● ● ● ● ● White oak Quercus alba ● ● ● ● ● American snowbell Stryrax americana ● ● ● ● ● ● Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Bigleaf snowbell Styrax grandifolia ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Southern red oak Quercus falcata ● ● ● ● ● ● Horse sugar Symplocos tinctoria ● ● ● ● Overcup oak Quercus lyrata ● ● ● ● Farkleberry Vaccinium arboreum ● ● ● ● ● ● Swamp white oak Quercus michauxii ● ● ● ● Deerberry Vaccinium stamineum ● ● ● ● ● ● Chinkapin oak Quercus muehlenbergii ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Swamp haw Viburnum nudum ● ● ● ● ● Water oak Quercus nigra ● ● ● ● Cherrybark oak Quercus pagoda
Recommended publications
  • Nitrogen Fixation in Roots of Ceanothus

    Nitrogen Fixation in Roots of Ceanothus

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Biology Faculty Publications Biology Summer 2019 Nitrogen Fixation in Roots of Ceanothus W. John Hayden University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/biology-faculty-publications Part of the Botany Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hayden, John W. "Nitrogen Fixation in Roots of Ceanothus." Sempervirens: The Quarterly of the Virginia Native Plant Society (Summer 2019): 6-7. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 6 Sempervirens, Summer 2019 Nitrogen Fixation in Roots of Ceanothus Article by W. John Hayden, Botany Chair oots are usually out of sight and, nitrogen-containing compounds. Rtherefore, out of mind. But as But there is a paradox about any good gardener will tell you, it is nitrogen and life. You, me, the of utmost importance to understand chickens in my backyard, and the those unique plant organs, even if their Pawpaw tree that shades them are essential functions occur hidden from all constantly bathed in atmospheric cursory observation. The red roots of nitrogen gas, yet that form of nitrogen the 2019 VNPS Wildflower of the Year, is completely unavailable to our cells, Ceanothus americanus, are particularly or the cells of my chickens, or my important because they host symbiotic Pawpaw. Every breath I take brings a bacteria that perform the essential quantity of fresh air into my lungs, 78 function of nitrogen fixation.
  • New Jersey Tea, Ceanothus Americanus, 2019 Virginia Wildlflower of the Year W

    New Jersey Tea, Ceanothus Americanus, 2019 Virginia Wildlflower of the Year W

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Biology Faculty Publications Biology 2019 New Jersey Tea, Ceanothus Americanus, 2019 Virginia Wildlflower of the Year W. John Hayden University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/biology-faculty-publications Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation W. John Hayden. New Jersey Tea, Ceanothus americanus, 2019 Virginia Wildflower of the Year. Virginia Native Plant Society, 2019. This Brochure is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ceanothus americanus ew Jersey Tea is a low shrub, generally less tips to the periphery of the flower. The five stamens Nthan 1 m tall and often profusely branched. are attached in radial alignment with the petals; fila- Stems are finely hairy, but may become smooth with ments are oriented vertically, positioning the anthers age. Vegetative stems are perennial, but flowering directly above the central portion of the flower. Ova- stems persist for just a single year. Leaves are mostly ries are three-lobed, superior, and positioned atop 5—10 cm long; leaf shape varies from narrowly to thick glandular disks; the short styles are topped with widely ovate, acuminate to acute at the apex, and cor- three-branched stigmas. Fruits possess a finely rugose date to rounded at the base; leaf margins are finely surface layer that is shed prior to ballistic dehiscence serrate; both leaf surfaces may be finely hairy, espe- of the inner layers; in this fashion the three seeds cially on the veins; vein pattern is pinnate with produced by each fruit are propelled a short distance In the Wild a pair of prominent secondary from the parent plant.
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE

    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE

    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
  • Symplocos Paniculata

    Symplocos Paniculata

    CHAPTER P14 PLEASE USE ONLY US ENGLISH; you must follow the format strictly; Browse through this sample chapter before typing yours in US ENGLISH only SYMPLOCOS PANICULATA (SAPPHIRE BERRY): A WOODY AND ENERGY- EFFICIENT OIL PLANT QIANG LIU, YOUPING SUN, JINGZHENG CHEN, PEIWANG LI, GENHUA NIU, CHANGZHU LI AND LIJUAN JIANG all names = first, middle & last Qiang Liu, PhD Candidate, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 498 South Shaoshan Rd., Changsha, Hunan 410004, China. Mobile: 86-15116272702; E-mail: [email protected] we must have mailing address/email of all authors where ecopy of book will be sent Youping Sun [first name, middle initial, last name], PhD, Senior Research Associate, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, TX 79927, USA. Mobile: +1-8646339385; E-mail: [email protected] Indicate Job title for all authors Jingzheng Chen, PhD Candidate, Research Scientist, Hunan Academy of Forestry, 658 South Shaoshan Rd., Changsha, Hunan 410004, China. Mobile: +86-15111084183; E-mail: [email protected] Peiwang Li, M.S., Associate Professor, Hunan Academy of Forestry, 658 South Shaoshan Rd., Changsha, Hunan 410004, China. Mobile: +86-15116325230; E-mail: [email protected] Genhua Niu, PhD, Associate Professor, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, TX 79927, USA. Mobile: +1-9152082993; E-mail: [email protected] Lijuan Jiang, PhD, Professor, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 498 South Shaoshan Rd., Changsha, Hunan 410004, China. Mobile: +86-13407314259; E-mail: [email protected] Changzhu Li, Ph.D., Professor, Hunan Academy of Forestry, 658 South Shaoshan Rd., Changsha, Hunan 410004, China.
  • Ethno Botanical Polypharmacy of Traditional Healers in Wayanad (Kerala) to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

    Ethno Botanical Polypharmacy of Traditional Healers in Wayanad (Kerala) to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 11(4), October 2012, pp. 667-673 Ethno Botanical Polypharmacy of Traditional Healers in Wayanad (Kerala) to treat type 2 diabetes Dilip Kumar EK & Janardhana GR* Phytopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Studies in Botany University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore-570006, Karnataka, India E-mail: [email protected] Received 30.06.10, revised 15.05.12 The aboriginal medical system prevalent among traditional healers of Wayanad has demonstrated a good practice, so bright future in the therapy of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, present study focused on identification validation and documentation such Ethno botanical polypharmacy prevalent in the district. A total of 47 species belonging to 44 genera comes under 29 families were identified being utilized in 23 different compound medicinal recipes for diabetic healthcare in Wayanad. These preparations and the herbal ingredients need scientific evaluation about their mechanism of action in living organism in heath as well as disease condition to confirm their activity against type 2 diabetes. Keywords: Type 2 diabetes, Traditional medicine, Polypharmacy, Wayanad district IPC Int. Cl.8: A61K, A61K 36/00, A01D 16/02, A01D 16/03 Local herbal healers of Wayanad (Kerala), India have communities that directly depend on it. The present numerous prescriptions aims directly to treat and study documented some of the ethno botanical manage type 2 diabetes (old age diabetes). This remedies for the management of diabetes so as includes over 150 herbal preparations including to protect it within the aboriginal repository of simple and compound folk recipes and diets. This knowledge (ARK) programme and also shed light traditional medical knowledge has demonstrated a on a traditional culture that believes that a healthy potent therapeutic system for the management of lifestyle is found only at a healthy environment 1.
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
  • The Ustilaginales (Smut Fungi) of Ohio*

    The Ustilaginales (Smut Fungi) of Ohio*

    THE USTILAGINALES (SMUT FUNGI) OF OHIO* C. W. ELLETT Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 10 The smut fungi are in the order Ustilaginales with one family, the Ustilaginaceae, recognized. They are all plant parasites. In recent monographs 276 species in 22 genera are reported in North America and more than 1000 species have been reported from the world (Fischer, 1953; Zundel, 1953; Fischer and Holton, 1957). More than one half of the known smut fungi are pathogens of species in the Gramineae. Most of the smut fungi are recognized by the black or brown spore masses or sori forming in the inflorescences, the leaves, or the stems of their hosts. The sori may involve the entire inflorescence as Ustilago nuda on Hordeum vulgare (fig. 2) and U. residua on Danthonia spicata (fig. 7). Tilletia foetida, the cause of bunt of wheat in Ohio, sporulates in the ovularies only and Ustilago violacea which has been found in Ohio on Silene sp. forms spores only in the anthers of its host. The sori of Schizonella melanogramma on Carex (fig. 5) and of Urocystis anemones on Hepatica (fig. 4) are found in leaves. Ustilago striiformis (fig. 6) which causes stripe smut of many grasses has sori which are mostly in the leaves. Ustilago parlatorei, found in Ohio on Rumex (fig. 3), forms sori in stems, and in petioles and midveins of the leaves. In a few smut fungi the spore masses are not conspicuous but remain buried in the host tissues. Most of the species in the genera Entyloma and Doassansia are of this type.
  • Native Trees of Georgia

    Native Trees of Georgia

    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
  • Ecosystem Restoration Guide for Pine Barrens (Drylands)

    Ecosystem Restoration Guide for Pine Barrens (Drylands)

    Ecosystem Management and Restoration Planning Guide: Drylands USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Durham, NH Alan P. Ammann Ph.D., Biologist Dry (Xeric) forest near Keene airport. Note pitch pine in right foreground and little bluestem in opening. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service (603) 868-7581 - www.nh.nrcs.usda.gov Ammann, A. P. - DRAFT 03/31/00 1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for planning ecosystem management and restoration projects in saline tidal wetlands in New Hampshire. It is intended for professional environmental planners including NRCS field office personnel. It may also be useful as an educational tool for interested laypersons including members of town Conservation Commissions. Non professional uses of this document are cautioned that ecosystem restoration requires professional judgement based on education and experience. GEOGRAPHIC AREA TO WHICH THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES This document is intended for New Hampshire. Knowledgeable persons can apply it to New England. Many of the principles and structure of this document can be adapted to other areas of the United States ECOSYSTEM DESCRIPTION Drylands are those portions of the New Hampshire landscape that typically have low available soil moisture due to their coarse textures soils and position in the landscape. Under natural conditions fire dependent sub-climax communities (Pine Barrens and native grasslands) occur as a patchwork within a matrix of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and mixed hardwood dry forest matrix. The sub-climax communities arise in the open sunny conditions following fire and are dominated by pitch pine (Pinus rigida Miller), red pine (Pinus resinosa Aiton) and to the north by jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lambert).
  • Native Plants for Your Backyard

    Native Plants for Your Backyard

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Your Backyard Native plants of the Southeastern United States are more diverse in number and kind than in most other countries, prized for their beauty worldwide. Our native plants are an integral part of a healthy ecosystem, providing the energy that sustains our forests and wildlife, including important pollinators and migratory birds. By “growing native” you can help support native wildlife. This helps sustain the natural connections that have developed between plants and animals over thousands of years. Consider turning your lawn into a native garden. You’ll help the local environment and often use less water and spend less time and money maintaining your yard if the plants are properly planted. The plants listed are appealing to many species of wildlife and will look attractive in your yard. To maximize your success with these plants, match the right plants with the right site conditions (soil, pH, sun, and moisture). Check out the resources on the back of this factsheet for assistance or contact your local extension office for soil testing and more information about these plants. Shrubs Trees Vines Wildflowers Grasses American beautyberry Serviceberry Trumpet creeper Bee balm Big bluestem Callicarpa americana Amelanchier arborea Campsis radicans Monarda didyma Andropogon gerardii Sweetshrub Redbud Carolina jasmine Fire pink Little bluestem Calycanthus floridus Cercis canadensis Gelsemium sempervirens Silene virginica Schizachyrium scoparium Blueberry Red buckeye Crossvine Cardinal flower
  • <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>

    <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>

    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2009 Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America Chad Eric Husby Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10022522 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Husby, Chad Eric, "Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 200. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/200 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS OF EQUISETUM GIGANTEUM IN SOUTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Chad Eric Husby 2009 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Chad Eric Husby, and entitled Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett _______________________________________ Jack B. Fisher _______________________________________ David W. Lee _______________________________________ Leonel Da Silveira Lobo O'Reilly Sternberg _______________________________________ Steven F. Oberbauer, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2009 The dissertation of Chad Eric Husby is approved.
  • Cocoa Beach Maritime Hammock Preserve Management Plan

    Cocoa Beach Maritime Hammock Preserve Management Plan

    MANAGEMENT PLAN Cocoa Beach’s Maritime Hammock Preserve City of Cocoa Beach, Florida Florida Communities Trust Project No. 03 – 035 –FF3 Adopted March 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 1 II. Purpose …………………………………………………………….……. 2 a. Future Uses ………….………………………………….…….…… 2 b. Management Objectives ………………………………………….... 2 c. Major Comprehensive Plan Directives ………………………..….... 2 III. Site Development and Improvement ………………………………… 3 a. Existing Physical Improvements ……….…………………………. 3 b. Proposed Physical Improvements…………………………………… 3 c. Wetland Buffer ………...………….………………………………… 4 d. Acknowledgment Sign …………………………………..………… 4 e. Parking ………………………….………………………………… 5 f. Stormwater Facilities …………….………………………………… 5 g. Hazard Mitigation ………………………………………………… 5 h. Permits ………………………….………………………………… 5 i. Easements, Concessions, and Leases …………………………..… 5 IV. Natural Resources ……………………………………………..……… 6 a. Natural Communities ………………………..……………………. 6 b. Listed Animal Species ………………………….…………….……. 7 c. Listed Plant Species …………………………..…………………... 8 d. Inventory of the Natural Communities ………………..………….... 10 e. Water Quality …………..………………………….…..…………... 10 f. Unique Geological Features ………………………………………. 10 g. Trail Network ………………………………….…..………..……... 10 h. Greenways ………………………………….…..……………..……. 11 i Adopted March 18, 2004 V. Resources Enhancement …………………………..…………………… 11 a. Upland Restoration ………………………..………………………. 11 b. Wetland Restoration ………………………….…………….………. 13 c. Invasive Exotic Plants …………………………..…………………... 13 d. Feral