DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Goleta Beach Park Bridge Replacement Project, Santa Barbara County, California 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Goleta Beach Park Bridge Replacement Project, Santa Barbara County, California 0 Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Goleta Beach Park Bridge Replacement Project, Santa Barbara County, California 05-SB-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO-5951 (120) Prepared for: County of Santa Barbara Department of Public Works Prepared by: SWCA Environmental Consultants February 2015 Goleta Beach Park Bridge Replacement Project Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 05-SB-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO-5951 (120) Prepared for: County of Santa Barbara Department of Public Works 123 East Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Attn: Charlie Elbert, County Project Manager (805) 568-3123 Prepared by: Travis Belt, Senior Biologist SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-7095 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 26967 February 2, 2015 Goleta Beach Park Bridge Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 2.1 RESPONSIBLE PARTIES AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ............................................... 1 2.2 LOCATION OF PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 1 2.3 PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 2.4 JURISDICTIONAL AREAS TO BE IMPACTED BY HABITAT TYPE .................................. 4 2.4.1 Sarcocornia Pacifica Herbaceous Alliance (Southern Coastal Salt Marsh) ........................ 5 2.4.2 Restored Southern Bluff Scrub ........................................................................................... 5 3 GOALS OF THE COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PROJECT ................................................ 6 3.1 SOUTHERN BLUFF SCRUB RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT ................................ 6 3.2 SOUTHERN COASTAL SALT MARSH RESTORATION AND EXPANSION ..................... 9 3.2.1 Restore Tidal Flow and Estuarine Functions to Adjacent Wetlands ................................... 9 3.3 TIME LAPSE BETWEEN JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS AND EXPECTED COMPENSATORY MITIGATION SUCCESS .......................................................................... 9 4 RESTORATION OF TEMPORARILY IMPACTED AREAS ..................................................... 11 4.1 SITE PREPARATION ............................................................................................................... 11 4.2 SOUTHERN COASTAL BLUFF SCRUB HYDRAULIC MULCH SEEDING ...................... 11 4.3 SOUTHERN COASTAL BLUFF SCRUB PLANTING ........................................................... 11 4.4 IRRIGATION PLAN ................................................................................................................. 12 4.5 SOUTHERN COASTAL SALTMARSH RESTORATION...................................................... 13 4.5.1 Coastal Salt Marsh Material Salvage ................................................................................ 13 4.5.2 Coastal Salt Marsh Seed Collection and Propagation ....................................................... 14 4.5.3 Coastal Salt Marsh Material Planting ............................................................................... 14 5 ENHANCEMENT/EXPANSION OF EXISTING HABITATS ..................................................... 14 5.1 SOUTHERN COASTAL BLUFF SCRUB ENHANCEMENT................................................. 14 5.2 SOUTHERN COASTAL SALT MARSH ................................................................................. 15 5.2.1 Tidal Flow Restoration Project ......................................................................................... 15 6 MAINTENANCE PLAN.................................................................................................................... 15 6.1 WATERING ............................................................................................................................... 16 6.2 WEED CONTROL AND HERBICIDE USE ............................................................................ 16 6.3 DEBRIS REMOVAL AND VANDALISM ............................................................................... 16 6.4 REPLANTING ........................................................................................................................... 19 7 MONITORING PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 19 7.1 MONITORING SCHEDULE..................................................................................................... 19 7.2 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND SUCCESS CRITERIA............................. 19 7.3 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................ 20 7.3.1 Coastal Bluff Scrub Planting Percent Survival ................................................................. 20 7.3.2 Southern Coastal Salt Marsh Planting Percent Cover ....................................................... 20 SWCA Environmental Consultants i Goleta Beach Park Bridge Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 7.3.3 Southern Coastal Salt Marsh and Tidal Flow Restoration in Adjacent Wetland .............. 21 7.3.4 Percent Cover Non-native Species .................................................................................... 21 7.3.5 Other Attributes to Monitor .............................................................................................. 22 7.4 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 22 7.4.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ......................................................................................... 22 7.4.2 California Department of Fish and Wildlife ..................................................................... 22 7.4.3 Regional Water Quality Control Board ............................................................................ 22 7.4.4 California Coastal Commission ........................................................................................ 23 8 COMPLETION OF MITIGATION ................................................................................................. 23 8.1 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION ....................................................................................... 23 9 CONTINGENCY MEASURES ........................................................................................................ 23 10 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 24 Figures Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Project Location Map .................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Project Planting Plan ..................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4. Map of Estimated Tidal Inundation Following Culvert Replacement ......................................... 17 Tables Table 1. Impact and Mitigation Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Table 2. Estimated Mitigation and Monitoring Schedule ............................................................................. 9 Table 3. Southern Coastal Bluff Scrub Container Plant Palette .................................................................. 12 Table 4. Coastal Saltmarsh Salvage and Planting Palette ........................................................................... 14 Table 5. Annual Performance Standards ..................................................................................................... 20 Attachments Attachment A. Habitat and Jurisdictional Impacts Maps Attachment B. Tidal Flow Restoration Map and Data Sheet Attachment C. USACE Monitoring Report Guidelines SWCA Environmental Consultants ii Goleta Beach Park Bridge Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 1 INTRODUCTION This Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) has been prepared to mitigate project impacts within U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Coastal Commission (CCC) jurisdictions that will result from the Goleta Beach Park Bridge Replacement Project (project). The HMMP structure follows guidelines presented in the Checklist for Compensatory Mitigation Proposals, dated June 10, 2008, and the Final Rule for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources, dated April 10, 2008. 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Responsible Parties and Financial Assurances As the project applicant, the party responsible for meeting the mitigation obligation pursuant to the special conditions of the Clean Water Act and State agency permitting is: County of Santa Barbara Department of Public Works 123 Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 The County of Santa Barbara Department of Public Works (County) will conduct the project with financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Through FHWA programs and internal funds, the County has the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of the South-Coast Basins of Santa Barbara County, California
    Geology and Ground-Water Resources; of the . f * ".** '*, -» South-Coast Basins of Santa Barbara County, California By J. E. UPSON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1108 Prepared in cooperation with Santa Barbara County With a section on Surf ace-Water Resources By H. G. THOMASSON, Jr. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1951 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.50 (paper cover) CONTENTS Fan Abstract-..._______________________________________ _____ _ _ 1 Introduction_____________________________ __^__ _______ 5 Location and general features of the area_________-___-----_--_ - 5 Purpose and scope of report______________________---_-_-_---_ 6 Acknowledgments- _____________________ _ _-__ '7 Well-numbering system and well data___________-_-----__----_ - 7 Physical features of the areas.______ _____________________________ 8 Topography and dramage_____________________ _____ __ 8 Carpinteria basin_________________________________________ 8 Goleta basin_____________________________ 9 Santa Barbara area_________________________ 10 Montecito area_____________________________ _ 10 Climate-__________________________________ 10 Geology._______________________________________ ___________ 12 Earlier work._________________________________________________ 12 Stratigraphic units___________________________________________ 12 Age and general features______________________
    [Show full text]
  • Surfers Beach and Miramar Half Moon Bay (El Granada and Half Moon Bay, CA)
    Surfers Beach and Miramar Half Moon Bay (El Granada and Half Moon Bay, CA) Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, Vice President Environmental Science Associates (ESA) [email protected] Coastside Sea Rise & Erosion Forum Douglas Beach House in Miramar, May 24, 2016 Photograph © Colin Brown Who is this dude ? Professional Civil Engineer (CA,WA,LA,OR,FL) practicing 30 years Coastal Processes training from UCB, 1985 Chief Engineer, VP @ Environmental Science Associates (ESA), San Francisco http://www.esassoc.com/bios/robert‐battalio‐pe Practices management and enhancement of natural aquatic ecosystems, primarily shores, inlets, lagoons and tidal wetlands, also hazard mapping Surfer since 1970s Favorite location ‐ Taraval Street, OB Inducted, Double Overhead Association (DOA) at Wise Surf Shop, late 1980’s Pacifica resident since 1989 Started surfing Mavericks in early 1990’s Photograph © Colin Brown Problem(s) statement • Pillar point harbor – Traps sand supply to HMB littoral subcell, causing sediment deficit and erosion – Breakwater causes wave reflection which increases longshore transport toward south • Shore armoring on Coast Highway and Mirada Road – Increase wave reflection, increase longshore transport south and offshore, lowers beach – Erosion will accelerate in unarmored areas • Climate change, Sea level rise – everything gets worse (maybe not depths for navigation) • Result – Shoaling in Pillar Point Harbor – Erosion hot spot at surfers beach and Miramar – Increased erosion in southern HMB – Wave reflection from breakwater improves
    [Show full text]
  • The Goleta Slough Watershed a Review of Data Collected from October 2005 Through September 2006 by Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Goleta Stream Team by Al Leydecker
    The Goleta Slough Watershed A review of data collected from October 2005 through September 2006 by Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Goleta Stream Team by Al Leydecker Introduction The streams that drain the Goleta Slough watershed transport pollutants such as bacteria and excess nutrients down to the slough and ocean, and the purpose of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper's Stream Team program is to provide comprehensive monitoring of this ecologically important catchment. The Goleta Stream Team began in the summer of 2002 as a partnership program of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper and the Isla Vista Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation. The program has three goals: to collect baseline information about the health of the watershed; to help identify sources of pollution; and to educate and train a force of watershed stewards in the local community. Stream Team conducts monthly on-site testing at designated locations on streams tributary to the Goleta Slough and in the slough itself. Near the beginning of each month, teams of volunteers measure physical and chemical parameters using portable, hand-held instruments. Data collected include on-site measurements of dissolved oxygen, turbidity, conductivity, pH, temperature and flow. Water samples are collected at each site and later processed in Channelkeeper's laboratory for three Public Health bacterial indicators using approved standard methodology (Colilert-18 and Enterolert-24, manufactured by Idexx Laboratories; US-EPA, 2003). Additional samples are analyzed for nutrients through the cooperation of the Santa Barbara Channel – Long Term Ecological Research Project (SBC-LTER) at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The nutrient parameters measured are ammonium, nitrite plus nitrate, orthophosphate, total dissolved nitrogen and total dissolved phosphorus.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebird Numbers in Wetlands of the Pacific Flyway: ~ Summary of Spring, Fall, & Winter Counts in 1988, 1989, and 1990
    SHOREBIRD NUMBERS IN WETLANDS OF THE PACIFIC FLYWAY: ~ SUMMARY OF SPRING, FALL, & WINTER COUNTS IN 1988, 1989, AND 1990 0 Janet Iqelmyr, Gary W. Page, W. David Shuford, & Lynne E. Stenzel -~-~~~-'."!~'-, ( JulyJ991 ;-... ,_;:~ . v-n· ~ :·-' A report of Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway . · Stinson Beach, CA 94970 © Copyright, PRBO The data reported herein are part of an ongoing study of shorebird use of wetlands in the Pacific Flyway. For pennission to cite results from this report . in the scientific literature, please contact the authors. !d ~'i:!' ~~k.kfl ~ A 'Irsf, ;: Ch~~'t<"'~~~ PJaska Resources Library & Information Services Anchorage Alaskg KEY TO NUMBERED SITES 1 SMITH RIVER MOUTH 2 POINT ST. GEORGE 3 EEL RIVER MOUTH 4 POINT REYES(BODEGA BAY WETLANDS BODEGA HARBOR ESTERO AMERICANO TOMALES BAY DRAKES ESTERO LIMANTOUR ESTERO BOUNAS LAGOON 5 MONTEREY BAY AREA PAJARO RIVER(WATSONVILLE SLOUGH ELKHORN SLOUGH SAUNAS RIVER MOUTH SALINAS SEWAGE PONDS 8 LOS ANGELES RIVER 7 SEAL BEACH NWR 8 BOLSACHICA 9 BATIQUrTOS LAGOON & SAN EUJO LAGOON 10 SAN DIEGO BAY AREA MISSION BAY SAN DIEGO BAY TIJUANA RIVER MOUTH 11 HARNEY LAKE 12 MUD LAKE 13 CAMPBELL LAKE 14 HART LAKE 15 GOOSE LAKE 18 UPPER ALKAU LAKE 17 SACRAMENTO NWR ... 18 DELEVAN NWR - ·-··- ·-:·:. '·'· -~-- ; 19 COLUSANWR 20 BUTTE SINK NWR 21 GRAY LODGE WA 22 SUTTER NWR 23 WOODLAND SUGAR PONDS 24 NATOMAS ROAD 25 UPPER BEACH LAKE 28 MODESTO SEWAGE PONDS . ·.··· ... ~- ~~~: . : .... - ··,. 27 GRASSLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT 28 BARBIZON FARMS & WESTLAKE FARMS NORTH EVAPORATION PONDS 29 HANFORD SEWAGE PONDS 30 DINUBA SEWAGE PONDS 31 CROWLEY LAKE ____ ,·..,. -.-·- 32 CORCORAN SEWAGE PONDS 33 TULARE SEWAGE PONDS · '' 34 VISAUA SEWAGE PONDS .
    [Show full text]
  • California Rare & Endagered Birds
    California brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis californicus State Endangered 1971 Fully Protected Federal Endangered 1970 General Habitat: The California brown pelican uses a variety of natural and human-created sites, including offshore islands and rocks, sand spits, sand bars, jetties, and piers, for daytime loafing and nocturnal roosting. Preferred nesting sites provide protection from mammalian predators and sufficient elevation to prevent flooding of nests. The pelican builds a nest of sticks on the ground, typically on islands or offshore rocks. Their nesting range extends from West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park to Islas Los Coronados, immediately south of and offshore from San Diego, and Isla San Martín in Baja California Norte, Mexico. Description: The brown pelican is one of two species of pelican in North America; the other is the white pelican. The California brown pelican is a large, grayish-brown bird with a long, pouched bill. The adult has a white head and dark body, but immature birds are dark with a white belly. The brown pelican weighs up to eight pounds and may have a wingspan of seven feet. Brown pelicans dive from flight to capture surface-schooling marine fishes. Status: The California brown pelican currently nests on West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park. West Anacapa Island is the largest breeding population of California. In Mexico, the pelicans nest on Islas Los Coronados and Isla San Martín. Historically, the brown pelican colony on Islas Los Coronados was as large as, or larger than, that of recent years on Anacapa Island.
    [Show full text]
  • David Revell, Ph.D
    David L. Revell, Ph.D. Principal Professional Profile Dr. David Revell is a coastal geomorphologist with more than 25 years of experience studying marine, coastal, and estuarine processes, working to integrate science and management of coastal processes and climate change. He has served as a technical advisor and facilitator to multiple federal, state, and local jurisdictions related to ocean and coastal management especially at the intersection of how physical processes and human alterations affect Education and hazards, habitats, and human use. He has been involved in a wide Credentials variety of contentious community stakeholder processes ranging Ph.D., Earth Sciences, University from evaluating erosion hazard alternatives to climate change of California, Santa Cruz, 2007 vulnerability impacts to lagoon and fisheries management, water M.S., Oceanography and Marine quality, and marine spatial planning. Much of his work involves Resource Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, physical process research and spatial analysis to facilitate Oregon, 2000 communication of science to inform decision-making. Dr. Revell B.A., Geography, and B.A. currently advises multiple local jurisdictions and agencies on dune Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, and sediment management, climate change, estuary processes, inlet California, 1998 and 1996 management, and local coastal program updates. Continuing Education Relevant Experience and Training Postdoctoral Research, Institute Coastal Resiliency of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, April West Cliff Drive Adaptation and Management Plan, Santa Cruz, 2007–April 2008. California—Developing a neighborhood scale/transportation corridor adaptation plan along iconic West Cliff Drive in Santa Cruz, balancing coastal erosion, transportation, recreation, and community visioning. Specific work tasks included hazard modeling, local coastal program policy development, and social vulnerability and economic and engineering analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan Draft
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Andrew Bermond, City of Santa Barbara Airport Department Judi Krauss, Coffman Associates From: John Davis IV, Dudek Senior Ecologist Subject: Response to Comment on White-tailed Kites from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for the Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan Project, Santa Barbara County, SCH #2014061096. Date: June 5, 2017 Attachment(s): Figure 1 – White-tailed Kite Occurrences Area Figure 2 – Cumulative Study Area This memorandum is in response to California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) comments on the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan, Santa Barbara County; SCH #2014061096 (August 6, 2014) and follow-up letters received in response to the Draft and Recirculated Draft Program EIRs (October 29, 2015, and September 12, 2016, respectively). Under the Specific Comment “Taxiway H Feature,” the CDFW expressed concern that the area on existing Goleta Slough Ecological Reserve proposed for expansion of Taxiway H supports foraging (or more accurately hunting) habitat for the white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus; kite), which is a California fully protected species (CFGC Section 3511), and habitats near known nesting sites are essential to the species’ survival and reproduction in the local and regional area. The CDFW further states that it would consider loss of foraging habitat near known nests to be significant at the project level and to add to cumulative habitat losses in the surrounding area. This memorandum responds to this comment and concludes: (1) available evidence suggests that low quality foraging habitat for the white-tailed kite exist along Taxiway H, (2) the proposed Taxiway H is located at the extent of typical foraging distances from known kite nesting locations, and (3) the impacts to low quality foraging habitat from development of the proposed extension of Taxiway H would not contribute substantially to the cumulative impact to white- tailed kite foraging habitat in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Planning Implications
    DRAFT 4 City of Goleta, California May 2004 BACKGROUND REPORT NO. 24 Hydrology and Water Quality INTRODUCTION This background report describes the hydrological characteristics of the City of Goleta. The City of Goleta’s hydrological features consist of creeks and associated flood plains, ponds, wetlands, and the Ocean. While this report provides an overview of these resources, other reports examine particular areas or issues in the City in greater depth. These reports include Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan and the related Environmental Impact Report; Comstock Homes Development and Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan, March 2004, Goleta Slough Ecosystem Management Plan, December 1997, and Water Quality Analysis Report, County of Santa Barbara, December 2003. PLANNING IMPLICATIONS Since hydrological features shape the land forms of an area, these features contribute to the physical character of the community. Hydrological forces create these land forms through processes such as erosion and flooding. These processes in turn pose constraints and hazards for use and development. Water, as the basis for all life, creates the environment for the community’s biological resources and ecology. Modification of the hydrological system, either by physical alteration or by change in water quality, will affect these biological systems. The potential of adverse impacts associated with development is an important constraint on how land might be used, developed or managed. Water and its quality affects other aspects of the quality of life since water is the basis of many recreational activities. City of Goleta, California XXIV-1 General Plan Report: Hydrology GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The City of Goleta is situated in the western portion of the Goleta Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Background (Through 2014)
    Goleta Slough Area Sea Level Rise and Management Plan Background PART 2 – BACKGROUND (THROUGH 2014) 2.1 Location and Relationship to Surrounding Areas 2.1.1 Goleta Slough Goleta Slough is located in southern Santa Barbara County between the Santa Ynez Mountains and the Pacific Ocean. The Slough is the northernmost example of a large Southern California estuary and represents the northern limit of distribution for several plant and animal species (Zedler, 1982). It includes the Goleta Slough Ecological Reserve and the Goleta Slough State Marine Conservation Area, both of which are managed by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The general location of the Slough is shown in Figure 2-1, General Location of the GSEMP Area. In addition to its biological importance, Goleta Slough provides many other functions and values including floodwater storage capacity, filtering of pollutants contained in stormwater runoff, open space, and educational and scientific opportunities. The area is also rich in cultural and historic resources. The Slough is designated an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) in planning documents, as are most of the creeks that drain into it. The Slough’s watershed is about 45 square miles and includes the drainages of seven creeks: Atascadero, Carneros, Las Vegas, Maria Ygnacia, San Jose, San Pedro and Tecolotito Creeks (See Figure 2-14, Watersheds). Goleta Slough was historically an embayment of approximately 18 square miles in size. The name “Goleta” means schooner in Spanish, reflecting the history of the area when Goleta Slough was a bay with boats sailing inland close to what is now Hollister Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E – Modeling Report
    Appendix E – Modeling Report This appendix contains the modeling report submitted by John Brocatus as part of his M.S. Thesis in Coastal Engineering at Delft University of Technology. The report is part of the cooperation between Deltares and United States Geological Survey (USGS), and was funded by the USGS through a grant from BEACON. A summary of this report is presented in Chapter 9 (Numerical Modeling Sediment Budget Analysis for the Santa Barbara Littoral Cell using Delft3D) of the main report. 785 Sediment Budget Analysis of the Santa Barbara Littoral Cell A study to identify and quantify the pathways of sediment transport Prepared for: USGS Sediment Budget Analysis of the Santa Barbara Littoral Cell A study to identify and quantify the pathways of sediment transport J. Brocatus Supervising Committee: Prof.dr.ir. M.J.F. Stive Delft University of Technology Dr.ir. E.P.L. Elias Deltares Ir. D.J.R. Walstra Deltares Dr. P.L. Barnard US Geological Survey Dr.ir. L.H. Holthuijsen Delft University of Technology Report October 2008 © Deltares, 2008 Sediment Budget Analysis of the Santa Barbara Littoral Cell October 2008 Preface This M.Sc. thesis is written to complete my master in Coastal Engineering at the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences of Delft University of Technology. The thesis is part of the cooperation between Deltares and United States Geological Survey (USGS), within the framework of many research USGS is doing in the Santa Barbara region. Many people have contributed in different ways to the realisation of this thesis. First of all I would like to thank my graduation committee, prof.
    [Show full text]
  • DPP 1985 Revised DPP ESA Consultation Platform Gina
    7300 Mr. Steve Chambers U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Field Office 2140 Eastman Ave. Ste. 100 Ventura, CA 93003 Dear Mr. Chambers: This letter is concerning Unocal s revised development and production plan for Platform Gina. A copy of the revised plan was forwarded to your office on October 1, 1991, and on October 24 1991 we met with Donna Brewer and Naomi Mitchell of your staff to brief them on the project. Briefly, the project includes Unocal s proposal to develop a new gas field from Platform Gina and to repair and convert to gas service an existing water return pipeline. The pipeline connects Unocal s Mandalay processing facility (in the City of Oxnard) to Platform Gina. The drilling of a maximum of seven (7) additional wells, to facilitate gas production from new reservoirs, is also proposed. We would like to request informal consultation with your agency regarding the possible effects of this project on any threatened or endangered species that are under your jurisdiction. Specifically, during meetings with Unocal, your agency and other governmental agencies, questions have arisen regarding possible effects on Snowy Plovers, California Least Terns, Globose Dune Beetles and California Brown Pelicans. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Michael McCrary of my staff at (805) 389-7865, or (FTS) 683-7865 Sincerely, Richard L. Wilhelmsen Regional Supervisor Office of Leasing and Environment bcc: FILE: 1102-Ola Platform Gina DPP Corr. RD Chron RS, OLE RF Chief, EOS OLE: MSilverman:F: \home\msilver\nmfs.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Appendix C SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES INVENTORY
    Appendix C Appendix C SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES INVENTORY Special-Status Species Inventory for the Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan Update Prepared for: Coffman Associates C/O James M. Harris 4835 East Cactus Road, Suite 235 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 602.993.6999 Prepared by: 621 Chapala Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Contact: John H. Davis IV, Senior Ecologist 805.963.0651 OCTOBER 2012 C-1 C-2 Santa Barbara Airport Special-Status Species Inventory TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Airport Location...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Airport Master Plan................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Biological Setting.................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 History of the Airport and Goleta Slough ................................................... 5 1.3.2 Airport Safety and Wildlife Management................................................... 6 1.3.3 Habitat Restoration in the Goleta Slough ................................................... 7 1.3.4 Existing Sensitive Biological Resources .................................................... 9 2.0 METHODS .......................................................................................................................11 2.1 Special-Status Species Defined............................................................................
    [Show full text]