The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Senate Bill 2820: The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Overview • What Does the Reform, Shift + Build Act do? o This comprehensive bill is designed to increase police accountability, shift the role of law enforcement away from surveillance and punishment towards de-escalation and assistance, and begin to dismantle systemic racism o The Reform, Shift + Build Act is the Senate’s initial step towards addressing issues of racial justice and equity in the Commonwealth • Where did the bill come from? o In early June 2020, Senate President Karen Spilka formed the bipartisan Senate Working Group on Racial Justice in response to protests in the wake of the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery and others o The bipartisan Working Group—which was co-chaired by Sens. Sonia Chang-Díaz (D-Boston) and William Brownsberger (D-Belmont)—included Sens. Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester), Michael Moore (D-Millbury), Nick Collins (D-Boston), and Jo Comerford (D-Northampton); one of the Democrats is a former police officer and one of the co-chairs is a member of the Black & Latino Legislative Caucus o The Working Group largely evaluated existing bills, which had been vetted through the traditional legislative process, including the joint committee process and public hearings; Senators suggested existing bills to the Working Group for their consideration for inclusion in an omnibus bill focused on police accountability and racial justice o The policies included were modeled after recommendations from community advocates and elected officials of color from around the state o The resulting bill, the Reform, Shift + Build Act, was released by the Senate Ways and Means Committee on July 6, 2020 and was endorsed by the NAACP New England Area Conference (NEAC) and the ACLU of Massachusetts; many of the reforms were also welcomed by law enforcement groups o Once the bill was released, discussions continued with Senators, police groups, the NAACP- NEAC and the ACLU of Massachusetts to reach consensus on bill language; groups were invited to submit clarifying language Senate Bill 2820: The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Page 1 of 9 • How do the reforms in the Reform, Shift + Build Act keep communities of color safe? o The reforms included in the bill will decrease the footprint of policing overall as well as the likelihood of misconduct by setting clear standards, requiring de-escalation and strengthening accountability o By banning racial profiling and collecting comprehensive demographic data on police stops, communities of color will be made safer from the consequences of implicit bias, and bad actors can be identified earlier on by police departments and communities o The bill increases community safety by redirecting resources to strategies that build neighborhood stability and strength: job creation and economic development, education, and mental and behavioral health services o The bill reallocates money from the corrections system and police overtime fraud to economic empowerment initiatives in communities impacted by over-policing and mass incarceration; grants will be controlled by a board of community members, local leaders and residents Bill Components: Reform • Accountability, Oversight + Training o The bill creates a Police Officer Standards and Accreditation Committee (POSAC)—an independent state entity composed of law enforcement professionals, community members, and racial justice advocates—to standardize the certification, training, and decertification of police officers. The POSAC includes six law enforcement members, both management and rank-and-file officers, eight non-law enforcement members and one retired judge All non-law enforcement members will have experience with or expertise in law enforcement practice and training, criminal law, civil rights law, the criminal justice system or social science fields related to race or bias The POSAC will have independent power to investigate misconduct, including subpoena power Certain offenses, such as excessive use of force or failing to intervene, will result in mandatory and permanent decertification of an officer Any POSAC investigation does not preclude an investigation by the officer’s appointing authority The POSAC process grants an officer the right to request a hearing, a right to be present at the hearing, a right to submit testimony at the hearing and a right to counsel at the hearing; the POSAC process also allows for a thorough appeals process, including in court Senate Bill 2820: The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Page 2 of 9 The POSAC has the ability to revoke the certification of an officer found in violation of the use of force laws established in the bill, and other actions such as involvement in hate crimes, false arrests and witness intimidation Decertification is for life; a decertified officer cannot work as a police officer or corrections officer anywhere in Massachusetts The results of substantiated complaints will be available in a publicly searchable database The bill establishes a commission to recommend a correctional officer certification, training, and decertification framework similar to the POSAC; recommendations are due by July 31, 2021 o What exactly is the POSAC process for decertification? The POSAC can receive a complaint from any person If the complaint is of a charge that would result in automatic decertification, the POSAC must investigate it If it is of a lesser charge, the POSAC may investigate or they may request that the officer’s employing agency investigate it—or both investigations may proceed concurrently if both authorities choose to investigate The POSAC has the ability to subpoena police records and other documentation necessary for the investigation When the investigation is complete, the POSAC hearing panel votes The simple majority decision prevails, as is the case with other licensed professions; the standard will be the high bar of clear and convincing evidence If revocation of certification takes place, an officer’s decertification is maintained within state and national data systems Adverse actions taken by the POSAC against an officer’s certification may not be appealed to the civil service commission o The bill includes reforms to the State Police, including: Permitting the appointment of a colonel from outside the State Police Giving the colonel greater ability to apply discipline Creating a state police cadent program, tto increase diversity in the workforce Senate Bill 2820: The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Page 3 of 9 o The bill imposes a moratorium on the use facial surveillance technology by government entities until December 31, 2021 while a commission studies its use o The bill creates a task force to study the use of body and dashboard cameras by law enforcement agencies o The bill prohibits non-disclosure agreements in settlements over police misconduct o The bill mandates increased training on the history of systemic racism, responding to mental health emergencies, de-escalation techniques and use of force rules • Use of Force o The Reform, Shift + Build Act strengthens use of force standards for all law enforcement agents by: Banning chokeholds where the intent or result is to cause unconsciousness Limiting no-knock warrants to cases where not knocking would endanger lives, and increases the level of oversight needed to get a no-knock warrant to require sign-off by a judge Restricting the use of deadly force only to situations where it is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person; preventing escape is no longer an acceptable reason for deadly force Requiring the use of de-escalation tactics when feasible before the use of any physical or deadly force Creating a duty to intervene for officers who witness abuse of force and requiring the witnessing officer to report such abuse to supervisors by the end of their shifts Significantly increasing limits on police use of elevated crowd control tactics such as tear gas, rubber bullets and dogs Police may not use elevated crowd control tactics unless all of the following conditions apply: • De-escalation tactics have been tried and have failed, or were not feasible • There is a threat of imminent harm to people, not just property • The harm likely to be inflicted by the crowd control tactic is proportionate to the imminent harm that will occur if nothing is done. o All use of force standards in the bill provide an exception if there is imminent harm to the officer or another person Senate Bill 2820: The Reform, Shift + Build Act Final Bill Fact Sheet July 2020 Page 4 of 9 • Qualified Immunity + Indemnification o The following is background on qualified immunity: Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense created by the Supreme Court and since expanded The text from the decision of the Supreme Court case that established the modern concept of qualified immunity is as follows: [G]overnment officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known In defining this standard, the court sought to balance considerations of justice for plaintiffs with the social costs of excessive lawsuits In practice, qualified immunity has unfortunately served to shield police officers from accountability even in some of the worst cases of excessive
Recommended publications
  • MCSW Annual Report, FY 2020
    th Charles F. Hurley Building | 19 Staniford Street, 6 ​ Floor | Boston, MA 02114 | ​ Phone: (617) 626-6520 | Email: [email protected] ​ 1 Table of Contents Remarks from the Chair . 4 ​ Commissioners, Staff, and Interns . 4 ​ ​ Introduction . 5 ​ Charges . 5 ​ ​ Organization . 5 ​ ​ 2020 Recommendations to Appointing Authorities. 6 ​ MCSW FY 2020 Budget . 6 ​ Programs, Advocacy, and Education. 8 ​ Public Hearings . 8 ​ ​ International Women’s Day . 8 ​ ​ Advocacy Day . 9 ​ ​ Seventeenth Annual Commonwealth Heroines Program . 9 ​ ​ Girls Initiative . 10 ​ ​ ​ MCSW Internship Program . 10 ​ ​ ​ ​ Priority Legislation . 10 ​ Regional Commissions . 12 ​ Local Women’s Commissions . 13 ​ ​ ​ Regional Commission Annual Reports . 14 ​ Berkshire Regional Commission Annual Report . 14 ​ ​ Cape Cod and Islands Regional Commission Annual Report . 17 ​ ​ Eastern Regional Commission Annual Report . 24 ​ ​ Essex County Regional Commission Annual Report . 27 ​ ​ Hampden County Commission Annual Report . 29 ​ ​ Hampshire-Franklin Regional Commission Annual Report . 31 ​ ​ MetroWest Regional Commission Annual Report . 38 ​ ​ ​ ​ Plymouth County Commission Annual Report . 42 ​ ​ Upper Middlesex Commission Annual Report . 46 ​ ​ ​ Worcester Regional Commission Annual Report . 49 ​ ​ 2 Appendix . 53 ​ Cape and Islands Public Hearing Summary . 53 ​ ​ Eastern Regional Commission on the Status of Women and Girls Meeting Agenda(s) . 60 ​ ​ Great Barrington Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . .75 ​ ​ Springfield Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . 78 ​ ​ Weymouth Public Hearing Notes and Testimony . 80 ​ ​ COVID-19 Virtual Public Hearing and Survey Data . 83 ​ ​ Advocacy Day 2020 . 91 ​ ​ Community Meetings: May 13-15, 2020 . 93 ​ ​ 3 Remarks from the 2019-2020 Chair On behalf of the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women, it is my pleasure to present a brief summary of our FY20 Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Legislative Scorecard
    Legislative Scorecard Votes and Leadership 2013-14 LEGISLATIVE SESSION - 1 - This is the inaugural edition of the Environmental League of Massachusetts legislative scorecard. We produced this scorecard to inform citizens about how their legislators voted on important environmental issues. We are pleased and grateful for the support of so many environmental leaders in the legislature. The scorecard relies first on roll call votes on legislation that deals with environmental and energy issues. Because there are so few roll call votes each session—and often these votes are unanimous—we have scored additional actions by legislators to further distinguish environmental champions. Bonus points were awarded to legislators who introduced bills that were ELM priorities or who introduced important amendments, particularly budget amendments to increase funding for state environmental agencies. In addition, we subtracted points for legislators who introduced legislation or amendments that we opposed. We want to recognize leadership and courage, in addition to votes, and have made every attempt to be fair and transparent in our scoring. Much happens during the legislative process that is impractical to score such as committee redrafts, committee votes to move or hold a bill, and measures that would improve flawed legislation. We have not attempted to include these actions, but we recognize that they greatly influence the process and outcomes. None of the bills or amendments scored here should be a surprise to legislators in terms of ELM’s support or opposition. Going forward, ELM will include votes and other actions that support additional revenues for transportation and promote transit, walking and biking. George Bachrach, President Erica Mattison, Legislative Director Highlights of the Session projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy for Policy Change
    Advocacy for Policy Change Brandeis students work to reform Massachusetts law November 2020 Advocacy for Policy Change is a part of a national program, ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation. ENACT was made possible by a generous gift from Ethics Center International Advisory Board Member Norbert Weissberg and his wife, former Board Member Judith Schneider. In spring of 2019 ENACT was awarded a multi-year grant from the Teagle Foundation’s “Education for American Civic Life” initiative to expand to all 50 states and to enhance ENACT’s digital platform. t Norbert Weissberg and Judith Schneider at “Present and Defend: Projects from Advocacy for Policy Change,” April 2011. For more information about the projects in this report, visit www.brandeis.edu/ethics/atbrandeis/advocacy To learn about ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation, and to sign up for updates, visit go.brandeis.edu/ENACT Photos: David J. Weinstein except page 2: Mike Lovett and page 4 (bottom): Evan Berry Editorial Assistant: Elaina Pevide ’20 Table of Contents n Introduction 2 Melissa Stimell n A Message from Jay Kaufman ’68, MA ’73 4 n Required Project Components 5 n Ensuring Equitable Health Coverage for Children 6 Erin Chambers ’20 & Kalianni Neal Desatnik ’20 n Removing Obstacles and Expanding Abortion Access 12 Allia Service ’22 & Emma Wolters’20 n Fair Scheduling of Employees 18 Emily Rae Foreman ’20 & Elaina Pevide ’20 n Preventing Overdose Deaths and Increasing Access to Treatment 24 James Parkhill ’21 & Abby Smurzynski
    [Show full text]
  • CLM Endorsed Legislation
    40 COURT STREET, SUITE 410, BOSTON, MA 02108 | 617-695-1991 | WWW.CHILDRENSLEAGUE.ORG CLM Endorsed Legislation AN ACT RELATIVE TO MANDATED REPORTER REFORM (H.137) The bill establishes a Special Commission to review the existing mandated reporter law and make recommendations to improve the response and prevention of child abuse and neglect. The Commission will be composed of the OCA, DCF, EEC, the AG, CPCS, and CLM. FILED BY: SEN. JOAN LOVELY & REP. KAY KHAN LEAD BY: CHAIR KAY KHAN AN ACT RELATIVE TO EXPUNGEMENT (S.900) In 2018, Massachusetts passed legislation that created an opportunity to expunge juvenile and adult criminal records for folks whose offense was charged prior to their 21st birthday. The law created a significant limit: In order to expunge a record, there can only be one court case on the record. In effect, anyone who has a second or subsequent court case would be ineligible for expungement. This is a missed opportunity to tackle recidivism. This bill will close major gaps in the proposal by removing the only one court case restriction for cases charged prior to the individual’s 21st birthday and instead would limit eligibility by how long ago the individual had their last court case—allowing individuals to expunge their records if their last offense was three years (for misdemeanors) or seven years (for felonies) ago and they have no subsequent court case since. It will also reduce the number of offenses that are categorically ineligible for expungement (while keeping judicial discretion on the review of expungement requests), reduce the time to seal juvenile records for non- adjudications and allow for automatic sealing of eligible records.
    [Show full text]
  • An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Everyone Needs ID: An Act to Provide Identification to Homeless Youth and Families Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 Sponsored by Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Lead Sponsors: Senator Harriette Chandler and Representative Kay Khan Senate Cosponsors: Senators Will Brownsberger, Jo Comerford, Julian Cyr, Sal DiDomenico, Jamie Eldridge, Cindy Friedman, Pat Jehlen, Jason Lewis, Mike Moore, and Becca Rausch House Cosponsors: Representatives Ruth Balser, Natalie Blais, Daniel Carey, Mike Connolly, Dan Donahue, Marjorie Decker, Mindy Domb, Carolyn Dykema, Nika Elugardo, Tricia Farley-Bouvier, Sean Garballey, Carmine Gentile, Carlos González, Tami Gouveia, James Hawkins, Kevin Honan, Mary Keefe, David LeBoeuf, Jack Patrick Lewis, David Linsky, Adrian Madaro, Liz Malia, Paul Mark, Paul McMurtry, Liz Miranda, Jim O’Day, Elizabeth Poirier, Denise Provost, Dave Rogers, Lindsay Sabadosa, Jon Santiago, Tom Stanley, José Tosado, Steve Ultino, Aaron Vega, and Bud Williams Bill History: Both Senate Bill 2043 and House Bill 3066 were refiled in January 2019, and were reported out favorably by the Joint Committee on Transportation in November 2019. S. 2043 was sent to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, and may come up for a vote by the full Senate soon. H. 3066 was sent to the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, and is awaiting action. Last session, the bill (Senate Bill 2568) passed the Senate unanimously. Importance of
    [Show full text]
  • The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053
    The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053 April 7, 2020 David L. Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Dear Secretary Bernhardt, We are deeply dismayed and disappointed with the Department of the Interior's recent decision to disestablish and take lands out of trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe on March 27, 2020. Not since the mid-twentieth century has an Interior Secretary taken action to disestablish a reservation. This outrageous decision comes as we mark 400 years since the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620 and recognize the People of the First Light who inhabited these shores for centuries before contact. The Department’s capricious action brings shame to your office and to our nation. Your decision was cruel and it was unnecessary. You were under no court order to take the Wampanoag land out of trust. Further, litigation to uphold the Mashpee Wampanoag’s status as a tribe eligible for the benefits of the Indian Reorganization Act is ongoing. Your intervention was without merit and completely unnecessary. The fact that the Department made this announcement on a Friday afternoon in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates a callous disregard for human decency. Mashpee Wampanoag leaders were focused on protecting members of their tribe, mobilizing health care resources, and executing response plans when they received your ill-timed announcement. As you are well aware, the Department of the Interior holds a federal trust responsibility to tribes, which includes the protection of Native American lands.
    [Show full text]
  • MA CCAN 2020 Program FINAL
    Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth Massachusetts Senate *Denotes candidate does Candidates not have a website Senate District Democratic Republican Others 1st Bristol and Plymouth District Michael Rodrigues (i)* No candidate 1st Essex District Diana DiZoglio (i) No candidate 1st Essex and Middlesex District No candidate Bruce Tarr (i) 1st Hampden and Hampshire District Eric Lesser (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex District Edward Kennedy (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex and Norfolk District Cynthia Stone Creem (i) No candidate 1st Plymouth and Bristol District Marc Pacheco (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk District Nick Collins (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk and Middlesex District Joseph Boncore (i) No candidate 1st Worcester District Harriette Chandler (i)* No candidate 2nd Bristol and Plymouth District Mark Montigny (i)* No candidate 2nd Essex District Joan Lovely (i) No candidate 2nd Essex and Middlesex District Barry Finegold (i) No candidate 2nd Hampden and Hampshire District John Velis (i) John Cain 2nd Middlesex District Patricia D. Jehlen (i) No candidate 2nd Middlesex and Norfolk District Karen Spilka (i) No candidate 2nd Plymouth and Bristol District Michael Brady (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk District Sonia Chang-Diaz (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk and Middlesex District William Brownsberger (i) No candidate 2nd Worcester District Michael Moore (i) No candidate 3rd Essex District Brendan Crighton (i) No candidate 3rd Middlesex District Mike Barrett (i) No candidate 1 Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • SNAP Gap Cosponsors - H.1173/S.678 91 Representatives & 28 Senators
    SNAP Gap Cosponsors - H.1173/S.678 91 Representatives & 28 Senators Rep. Jay Livingstone (Sponsor) Representative Daniel Cahill Representative Jack Patrick Lewis Senator Sal DiDomenico (Sponsor) Representative Peter Capano Representative David Linsky Senator Michael Barrett Representative Daniel Carey Representative Adrian Madaro Senator Joseph Boncore Representative Gerard Cassidy Representative John Mahoney Senator William Brownsberger Representative Michelle Ciccolo Representative Elizabeth Malia Senator Harriette Chandler Representative Mike Connolly Representative Paul Mark Senator Sonia Chang-Diaz Representative Edward Coppinger Representative Joseph McGonagle Senator Jo Comerford Representative Daniel Cullinane Representative Paul McMurtry Senator Nick Collins Representative Michael Day Representative Christina Minicucci Senator Brendan Crighton Representative Marjorie Decker Representative Liz Miranda Senator Julian Cyr Representative David DeCoste Representative Rady Mom Senator Diana DiZoglio Representative Mindy Domb Representative Frank Moran Senator James Eldridge Representative Daniel Donahue Representative Brian Murray Senator Ryan Fattman Representative Michelle DuBois Representative Harold Naughton Senator Paul Feeney Representative Carolyn Dykema Representative Tram Nguyen Senator Cindy Friedman Representative Lori Ehrlich Representative James O'Day Senator Anne Gobi Representative Nika Elugardo Representative Alice Peisch Senator Adam Hinds Representative Tricia Farley-Bouvier Representative Smitty Pignatelli Senator
    [Show full text]
  • January 27, 2021
    January 27, 2021 His Excellency Governor Charlie Baker Massachusetts State House 24 Beacon Street Office of the Governor, Room 280 Boston, MA 02133 Delivered Electronically and via Certified Mail Dear Governor Baker, We, the Merrimack Valley Superintendents Association, write to you as a unified group of 22 school superintendents joined in this effort by all 22 of the union presidents in our respective districts, to respectfully request that you reclassify educators and make them eligible to receive COVID-19 vaccinations during Phase 1 of the vaccination process. We cite the guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in urging you to prioritize the health and well-being of our educators so that Massachusetts school districts can operate at the fullest possible strength as our nation begins to emerge from this global pandemic. In making our request, we cite the following: 1. Your office and the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) have drawn from the guidance and wisdom of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which strongly advocates for students to return to, at a minimum, an in-person hybrid learning model. AAP further advocates that students should fully return to the classrooms where and when possible. 2. We, as educators and leaders, recognize and agree that the best place for learning for our children is in the classroom. 3. We have a profound responsibility to support the educational, emotional, physical, and mental well-being of the children across the Commonwealth. 4. First responders, healthcare workers, and educators share a commonality in their work in that they must come into contact with dozens or hundreds of people daily and often cannot be completely socially distant from those they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of ACTON 2020 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Town of Acton
    TOWN TOWN ACTON OF 2020 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT TOWN ANNUAL 2020 TOWN OF ACTON 2020 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Town of Acton Incorporated as a Town: July 3, 1735 Type of Government: Town Meetings ~ Board of Selectmen/Town Manager Location: Eastern Massachusetts, Middlesex County, bordered on the east by Carlisle and Concord, on the west by Boxborough, on the north by Westford and Littleton, on the south by Sudbury, and on the southwest by Stow and Maynard. Elevation at Town Hall: 268’ above mean sea level Land Area: Approximately 20 square miles Population: Year Persons 1950 3,510 1960 7.238 1970 14,770 1980 19,000 1990 18,144 2000 20,331 2010 21,936 2020 22,170 Report Cover: (Top and Bottom Left) Groundbreaking at the North Acton Fire Station; (Top and Bottom Right) Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the Miracle Field Sports Pavilion Photos courtesy of Town Staff 2020 Annual Reports Town of Acton, Massachusetts Two Hundred and Eighty Fifth Municipal Year For the year ending December 31, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Administrative Services 8. Public Works Board of Selectmen 4 DPW/Highway 96 Town Manager 5 Green Advisory Board 97 Public Facilities 99 2. Financial Management Services Board of Assessors 8 9. Community Safety House Sales 9 Animal Control Officer 101 Finance Committee 18 Animal Inspector 101 Town Accountant 18 Emergency Management Agency 101 Fire Department 101 3. Human Services Auxiliary Fire Department 109 Acton Housing Authority 28 Police Department 109 Acton Nursing Services 29 Commission on Disabilities 31 10. Legislative Community Housing Corporation 32 Annual Town Meeting, June 29, 2020 116 Community Services Coordinator 35 Special Town Meeting, September 8, 2020 127 Council on Aging 35 Health Insurance Trust 37 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance
    Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance Campaign Finance Activity by Candidates for the Massachusetts General Court 2018 INTRODUCTION This study examines campaign finance activity undertaken by candidates for the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives (known collectively as The General Court) in calendar year 2018. The Office of Campaign and Political Finance has issued a report of this type after every state election since 1990. The information contained in this legislative study is based on data compiled from campaign finance reports electronically filed by candidates and treasurers of political committees organized on behalf of candidates for the Massachusetts Senate and House. In 2018, 377 candidates sought legislative office and filed disclosure reports with OCPF: 76 running for 40 Senate seats, and 301 seeking one of 160 House seats. Legislative candidates and their committees are required to file three campaign finance reports disclosing election year financial activity. The reports are due with OCPF eight days prior to the state primary election; eight days prior to the November general election; and in January of the year immediately following. Reports were due from the candidates in this study on Aug. 27, 2018, Oct. 29, 2018, and Jan. 21, 2019. Candidates and committee treasurers are required to disclose their account balances at the beginning of each reporting period; receipts and expenditures for the reporting period; in-kind contributions for the reporting period; and all liabilities. OCPF has taken steps to ensure that the information contained in this study is accurate as of the time of its compilation in 2019. This study takes into account many corrections, additions or deletions made by candidates as a result of any review conducted by OCPF or amendments filed by candidates or political committees.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES 2019-2020 Legislative Session
    LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES 2019-2020 Legislative Session ad We advocate for strong environmental laws and regulations on a broad range of issues. • Encouraging adequate funding for • Creating sustainable management of our state environmental programs water resources • Combating climate change • Ensuring stewardship of our urban and • Supporting compact, walkable state parks communities • Reducing the use of toxic chemicals • Building a 21st century transportation • Increasing recycling and reducing solid system waste FIRST TIER PRIORITIES Green Budget DEP Admin, DCR Parks, NHESP, and DER Our environmental agencies remain underfunded and understaffed. Adequate budgets for DEP, DCR, NHESP, and DER are critical to maintaining Massachusetts’ clean air and water and the public health of our residents. An Act Relative to Multi-State Offshore Wind Procurement H2920 – Representative Dave Rogers Compels Massachusetts to reach out to the other New England states to explore issuing a joint procurement for 6 GW of new offshore wind. It would also authorize Massachusetts to enter into such an agreement and direct utilities to purchase this new power. Between 4 and 9 GW of older fossil and nuclear power plants will close in coming years. It should be replaced by clean, inexpensive, and plentiful offshore wind. An Act to Promote Green Infrastructure and Reduce Carbon Emissions H2810 – Representative Jen Benson Puts a price on carbon emissions and creates new revenue while ensuring low and moderate income families are protected. In order to meet our GWSA mandates, we need to accelerate our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This market based approach would result in significant emissions reductions. An Act to Create a 2050 Roadmap to a Clean and Thriving Commonwealth H832 – Representative Joan Meschino Amends the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA) to require carbon neutrality by 2050.
    [Show full text]