DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment Riparian Ecosystem and Stream Restoration January 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment Riparian Ecosystem and Stream Restoration January 2009 TRUCKEE RIVER BELOW DERBY DAM RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Environmental Assessment Washoe and Storey Counties, Nevada U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lahontan Basin Area Office Carson City, Nevada January 2009 Prepared with assistance from: HDR Engineering, Inc Reno, Nevada City of Sparks City of Reno 431 Prater Way P.O. Box 1900 P. O. Box 857 Reno, Nevada 89505 Sparks, NV 89432-0857 (775) 334-2099 (775) 353-2310 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................................... 5 1.4 NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION........................................................................................... 5 1.5 PAST AND ONGOING PROJECTS AND PLANS......................................................................... 6 1.6 RELEVANT STATUTES, REGULATIONS, AND OTHER PLANS .......................................... 7 1.7 CURRENT RESERVOIR AND RIVER OPERATIONS IN THE TRUCKEE RIVER BASIN................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 ALTERNATIVES.................................................................................................................20 2.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 20 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................. 20 2.2.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 20 2.2.2 Proposed Action Alternative .................................................................................................. 20 2.2.3 Alternative Effect Table.......................................................................................................... 22 2.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER STUDY .......... 22 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT..........................................................................................28 3.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 28 3.2 WATER RESOURCES........................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 WATER QUALITY................................................................................................................................. 31 3.4 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES ......................................................................................................32 3.4.1 Upland Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2 Riparian Vegetation.................................................................................................................. 32 3.4.3 Wetland Vegetation.................................................................................................................. 33 3.5 NOXIOUS WEEDS................................................................................................................................ 33 3.6 WILDLIFE................................................................................................................................................ 33 3.7 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES, STATE SPECIES OF CONCERN, AND OTHER SENSITIVE SPECIES......................................................................................... 35 3.7.1 Lahontan Cutthroat Trout ...................................................................................................... 36 3.7.2 Cui-ui.......................................................................................................................................... 37 3.7.3 Species of Concern................................................................................................................... 38 3.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 40 3.8.1 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................... 40 3.8.2 Prehistory................................................................................................................................... 41 3.8.3 Ethnography ............................................................................................................................. 41 3.8.4 History ....................................................................................................................................... 42 3.9 INDIAN TRUST ASSETS..................................................................................................................... 43 3.9.1 Pyramid Lake Indian Reservation.......................................................................................... 44 Truckee River Below Derby Dam i Environmental Assessment Riparian Ecosystem and Stream Restoration January 2009 3.9.2 Reno-Sparks Indian Colony.................................................................................................... 44 3.9.3 Fallon Indian Reservation and Colony.................................................................................. 44 3.9.4 Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California .............................................................................. 45 3.9.5 Water Rights.............................................................................................................................. 45 3.9.6 Fish and Wildlife....................................................................................................................... 46 3.9.7 Trust Income ............................................................................................................................ 46 3.10 SOCIOECONOMIC RESOURCES.................................................................................................. 46 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE......................................................................................................... 46 3.12 LAND USE............................................................................................................................................. 48 3.13 LAND OWNERSHIP........................................................................................................................... 50 3.14 RECREATION ...................................................................................................................................... 50 3.15 AIR QUALITY....................................................................................................................................... 50 3.16 GEOLOGY............................................................................................................................................. 51 3.16.1 Groundwater........................................................................................................................... 52 3.16.2 Fluvial Geomorphic Features............................................................................................... 52 3.16.3 Soils .......................................................................................................................................... 53 3.17 HAZARDOUS, MATERIALS ............................................................................................................ 56 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .........................................................................57 4.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 57 4.2 WATER RESOURCES........................................................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 No action................................................................................................................................... 57 4.2.2 Proposed Action....................................................................................................................... 57 4.3 WATER QUALITY................................................................................................................................. 57 4.3.1 No Action.................................................................................................................................. 57 4.3.2 Proposed Action....................................................................................................................... 57 4.4 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES ......................................................................................................58 4.4.1 No Action.................................................................................................................................. 58 4.4.2 Proposed Action......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watershed Ed
    Spring 2019 WATERSHED ED Promoting watershed education and stewardship in Nevada STEM Education in Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak’s top priority is education, and the State’s STEM Advisory Council’s vision is that “every student in Nevada will have access and opportunities to experience a high-quality science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, with the ultimate objective that students are prepared to thrive in the New Nevada economy…” All schools are encouraged to adopt practices that engage and expose students to real-world problem solving, creative design, innovation, critical thinking, and career opportunities through STEM-focused formal and informal education. Schools in Nevada that meet the highest standards of STEM instruction are identified and recognized as STEM schools, as outlined in the Governor’s Designated STEM School Action Guide. Look Inside The Governor and his wife recently visited and 1 Stem Education in Nevada participated in Bordewich Bray Elementary School’s Family Science Night presented by Sierra Nevada 2 2019 Golden Pinecone Awards Journeys in Carson City. He spoke about how important education is to Nevada and how he was 3 Featured Watershed committed to supporting teachers, educators, students and families around the State. 4 NDOW Aquatic Fauna—Beaver It’s not just the schools that must recognize and 6 Science Career Highlight participate in the STEM experience. Families, businesses, industry and the community at large are 8 Opportunities/Events also encouraged to help drive STEM curriculum and experiences. 9 Resources/Contact (Continued on page 5) FEATURED Science Career Learn what it’s like to be a water quality scientist (see page 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Truckee River 2007
    NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORT F-20-54 2018 TRUCKEE RIVER WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Table of Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 3 PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................... 5 MANAGEMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................. 17 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 18 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT State: Nevada Project Title: Statewide Fisheries Program Job Title: Truckee River Period Covered: January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 SUMMARY On April 1, 2018, the designated end of the snow-measuring season, the snowpack in the Truckee River Basin stood at 75% of the median for that date and the amount of precipitation for the year stood at 90% of average. While the 2017/18 winter was slightly
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan
    CONSERVATION PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City Council Robert Cashell, Mayor Pierre Hascheff, At-Large Dan Gustin, Ward One Sharon Zadra, Ward Two Jessica Sferrazza, Ward Three Dwight Dortch, Ward Four David Aiazzi, Ward Five Office of the City Manager Charles McNeely, City Manager Mary Hill, Assistant City Manager Susan Schlerf, Assistant City Manager Donna Dreska, Chief of Staff Planning Commission Jim Newberg, Chair Kevin Weiske, Vice Chair Doug Coffman Lisa Foster Dennis Romeo Jason Woosley Community Development Department John B. Hester, AICP, Community Development Director John Toth, P.E., Assistant Community Development Director Claudia Hanson, AICP, Deputy Community Development Director - Planning Nathan Gilbert, Associate Planner Amended by City Council October 22, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Plan Organization ............................................................................................1 Boundary .........................................................................................................1 Time Frame .....................................................................................................1 Relationship to Other Plans .............................................................................1 Need for Conservation Plan.............................................................................1 Truckee River...................................................................................................2 Development Constraints............................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Cui-Ui, Chasmistes Cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a Review
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 45 Number 4 Article 1 10-31-1985 Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review William F. Sigler W.F. Sigler and Associates Inc., Logan, Utah Steven Vigg University of Nevada, Reno Mimi Bres George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Sigler, William F.; Vigg, Steven; and Bres, Mimi (1985) "Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 45 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol45/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published AT Provo, Utah, by Bricham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 45 31 October 1985 No. 4 LIFE HISTORY OF THE CUI-UI, CHASMISTES CUJUS COPE, IN PYRAMID LAKE, NEVADA: A REVIEW William F". Sigler', Steven Vigg", and Minii Bres' Abstract—The cui-ui, Chasmistcs ciijus Cope, a member of the .sucker family and endemic to Pyramid Lake, Nevada, is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Cui-ui was once a major source of sustenance for native Americans, who have inhabited the Lahontan region for at least 11,000 years. The Northern Paiutes developed sophisticated fishing technology to harvest this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 State of Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners
    STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS FISHING SEASONS CR 16-02 Amendment #1 The Board of Wildlife Commissioners, under the authority of 501.181 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, does hereby adopt the following regulation for the management of the fisheries resource: FISHING SEASONS MARCH 1, 2016 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2018 LIMITS “Limit” means the maximum number of game fish that may be lawfully taken and reduced to possession by a person in one day. The limit includes fish caught in Nevada which have been processed or preserved and are stored at any location. Fish that are caught and immediately released back to the water alive are not considered to be reduced to possession or part of the limit. A person shall not reduce game fish to possession if he already has the number of that fish in possession which equals or exceeds the limit of the water being fished. General limits are listed by county as all waters, all lakes and reservoirs or all streams and rivers. Exceptions to general limits and special regulations are listed by individual water. 1 CLARK COUNTY All regulations in Clark County are proposed to remain the same with the exception of the following (changes are delineated in boldface type): Lake Mohave Existing Regulation: OPEN WATERS: Lake Mohave Open year around 10 trout, 6 black bass, 25 Any hour of the day or catfish, and 15 crappie. night No limit on striped bass less than 20 inches total length (unlimited possession). The limit on striped bass 20 inches total length or longer is 20 fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Fire Commissioners, Truckee Meadows Fire
    BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS TRUCKEE MEADOWS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TUESDAY 9:00 A.M. NOVEMBER 10, 2020 PRESENT: Bob Lucey, Chair Marsha Berkbigler, Vice Chair* Kitty Jung, Commissioner (via telephone) Vaughn Hartung, Commissioner Jeanne Herman, Commissioner Janis Galassini, County Clerk Charles Moore, Fire Chief David Watts-Vial, Deputy District Attorney (via Zoom) The Board convened at 9:00 a.m. in regular session in the Commission Chambers of the Washoe County Administration Complex, 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our Country, the Clerk called the roll and the Board conducted the following business: 20-153F AGENDA ITEM 3 Public Comment. There was no response to the call for public comment. 20-154F AGENDA ITEM 4 Announcements/Reports. Truckee Meadows Fire Protection District Chief Charles Moore said green waste pile burning was slated to begin in December and would continue through January or February 2021. An announcement would soon be released regarding whether owners with large properties would be allowed to burn green waste on their land. Commissioner Hartung expressed appreciation for a letter of support for an advanced signal warning system to be installed near the intersection of Pyramid Highway and Calle de la Plata. An update was expected from the Nevada Department of Transportation regarding the possibility of installing systems along the entire Pyramid Highway corridor, as well as in the Mount Rose Highway area. Commissioner Hartung expressed a desire to work proactively on any potential safety issues. Commissioner Jung wondered whether a permit would be required for the open burning mentioned by Chief Moore and what the minimum acreage required for property owners to burn green waste on-site would need to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan
    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan PREPARED BY SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR THE California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region December 2009 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE rptfic'iii Printed on sustainable paper products COVER: Appleton Utopia Forest Stewardship Council certified by Smartwood (a Rainforest Alliance program), ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, EPA SmartWay Transport Partner Interior pages: Navigator Hybrid 85%-100% recycled post consumer waste blended with virgin fiber, Forest Stewarship Council certified chain of custody, ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, 80% energy from renewable resources Divider pages (main body): Domtar Colors Sustainable Forest Initiative fiber sourcing certified, 30% post consumer waste Divider pages (appendices): Hammermill Fore MP 30% post consumer waste PDF VERSION DESIGNED FOR DUPLEX PRINTING State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Sierra and Lassen Counties, California UPDATED: DECEMBER 2009 PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region Headquarters 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Attention: Terri Weist 530.644.5980 PREPARED BY: Sustain Environmental Inc. 3104 "O" Street #164 Sacramento, California 95816 916.457.1856 APPRnvFn RY- Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Projects and Environmental Improvement Projects (Eips) in the Upper Truckee Meadows Community Watershed
    Conservation Projects and Environmental Improvement Projects (EIPs) in the Upper Truckee Meadows Community Watershed: General Background The Upper Truckee River Community Watershed (UTRCW) is located in the southern side of the Lake Tahoe Basin primarily in eastern El Dorado County and partially in northern Alpine County. The UTRCW contains the subwatersheds of Camp Richardson (2,652 acres) as well as the Upper Truckee River (36,224 acres), of which is the largest watershed in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The total drainage area of the UTRCW is 69.7 square miles, and the main drainages are The Upper Truckee River, Angora Creek, Sawmill Pond Creek, Big Meadow Creek, and Grass Lake Creek. The northern portion of the watershed consists of the urban areas of South Lake Tahoe and Meyers, whereas the southern portion is primarily US Forest Service land managed by the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. The main channel of the Upper Truckee River is 21.4 miles long and originates in the volcanic bluffs surrounding Meiss Meadow near Carson Pass. The river then flows northward through a series of meadows and lakes until it reaches an 800-foot glacial step over, where it enters the head of Christmas Valley. The river flows through Christmas Valley until is it met by Angora Creek, downstream of the present-day Lake Tahoe Golf Course (LTGC). After converging with another unnamed tributary near the tenth hole of the LTGC, the UTR continues to flow northward through Sunset Ranch, the Lake Tahoe Airport, and to the eastern side of the Tahoe Keys through Cove East where it drains to Lake Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada, Reno
    University of Nevada, Reno Integrating urban heat island influences into statistically downscaled climate projections for the Truckee Meadows, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Atmospheric Science by Benjamin J. Hatchett Dr. Darko R. Koraĉin/Thesis Advisor May, 2012 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by BENJAMIN JAMES HATCHETT entitled Integrating Urban Heat Island Influences Into Statistically Downscaled Climate Projections For The Truckee Meadows, Nevada be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Darko Koracin, Advisor Michael Kaplan, Committee Member Scott Bassett, Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School May, 2012 i i Abstract The Truckee Meadows is a narrow, semi-arid valley located in the lee of the Sierra Nevada and includes the cities of Reno and Sparks, Nevada. Cities are usually warmer than the surrounding countryside, especially at night, due to changes in the surface energy budget. This effect is known as the urban heat island (UHI) and results in a decreased diurnal temperature range, increased urban water usage and cooling costs during the warm season and exacerbates public health problems associated with heat waves and air quality. An examination of the Truckee Meadows’ trends in daily and monthly mean minimum temperatures during 1938-2010 identified an UHI. The maximum summer UHI exceeds the magnitude predicted as a function of population by the classical method of Oke (1976) by 2°C. The thermal perturbation of the UHI was not discernible in nearby upper-air rawinsonde sounding data which indicates the shallow, localized effect of this physical phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-Ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada
    Fish and Wildlife Research 1 Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada By G. Gary Scoppettone Mark Coleman Gary A. Wedemeyer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D.C. • 1986 Contents Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 3 Spawning Migration ............................................................................................................ Prespawning Aggregation ............................................................................................. History of Recent Spawning Migrations ............................................................... 6 Upstream Migration ....................................................................................................... Reproduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 Fecundity ............................................................................................................................ 9 Spawning Habitat ............................................................................................................. 9 Emigration of Larvae .......................................................................................................... 10 Timing of
    [Show full text]
  • The VISTA NARROWS PROJECT the Vista 1 Narrows Project by E
    P A G E INSIDE THIS VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2 F A L L 2 0 2 0 ISSUE: The VISTA NARROWS PROJECT The Vista 1 Narrows Project By E. George Robison, Executive Director and Danielle Henderson, Natural Resource Manager Tell me your 6 at the Truckee River Flood Management Authority story: Are you EXPERIENCED The Vista Narrows Project is a key element of the TRFMA’s Truckee River with flood risk? Flood Management Project (Flood Project) that is being designed and per- An Open Letter mitted as a standalone project. The overall Flood Project is a $400 million project that is a joint effort between TRFMA, the cities of Reno and Sparks, Nevada’s 2020 8 Washoe County, and numerous stakeholders. Once completed, the Flood FMA Award Winners Project will reduce flood damages from 100-year flows in the Truckee Meadows region. Some elements have already been completed such as the Engaging 9 realignment of the North Truckee Drain; replacement of the Virginia Street Educational Bridge; and river restoration projects at Lockwood, 102 Ranch, Tracy, and Outreach Tools Mustang Ranch. The full extent of the Flood Project is from Reno to the Flood in a Time 10 town of Wadsworth and is shown in Flood Project Map Book available at: https://trfma.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mapbook-6-01_14_2015_compressed.pdf of Corona Virus Floodplain 12 Management Association: Emerging Professionals Upcoming 13 Events & New Bulletin Announcement P A G E 2 The VISTA NARROWS PROJECT Continued from page 1 Why is this project important? In the early 1960s, the federal government completed a series of flood control improvement projects on the Truckee River, which included removal of the Vista reefs, a natural bedrock out- crop in the river channel just east of Sparks, at Vista Narrows.
    [Show full text]
  • Newlands Project Frequently Asked Questions
    Newlands Project Frequently Asked Questions http://www.usbr.gov/mp/lbao/ What is the Newlands Project? The Newlands Project in Nevada is one of the first Reclamation projects in the country, with construction beginning in 1903. It covers lands in the counties of Churchill, Lyon, Storey, and Washoe and provides water for about 57,000 acres of irrigated land in the Lahontan Valley near Fallon and bench lands near Fernley. Made up of two divisions, the Truckee Division and the Carson Division, the Project has features in both the Carson and Truckee River basins with the Truckee Canal allowing interbasin diversions from the Truckee River to the Carson River. The major features of the Newlands Project include Lake Tahoe Dam, Derby Diversion Dam, the Truckee Canal, Lahontan Dam, Lahontan Power Plant, Carson River Diversion Dam and canals, laterals, and drains for irrigation of approximately 57,000 acres of farmlands, wetlands and pasture. Water for the Newlands Project comes from the Carson River and supplemental water is diverted from the Truckee River into the Truckee Canal at Derby Dam for conveyance to Lahontan Reservoir for storage. The water stored in Lahontan Reservoir or conveyed by the Truckee Canal is released into the Carson River and diverted into the `V` and `T` Canals at Carson Diversion Dam. The Bureau of Reclamation has a contract with the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District to operate and maintain the Newlands Project on behalf of the Federal government. Who is the Bureau of Reclamation? The Bureau of Reclamation is a federal agency within the Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]