Distribution and Numbers of Waterbird Species Breeding in the City of Wrocław

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution and Numbers of Waterbird Species Breeding in the City of Wrocław ISSN 2336-3193 Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 69: 175-180, 2020 DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2020-0013 Published: online 1 July 2020, print July 2020 Distribution and numbers of waterbird species breeding in the city of Wrocław Grzegorz Kopij Distribution and numbers of waterbird species breeding in the city of Wrocław. – Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur. 69: 175-180, 2020. Abstract: During the years 2003-2010, the numbers of pairs of waterbird species breeding in the city of Wrocław (293 km2) were assessed. The city is situated in Odra valley, where four smaller rivers join it. The city abandons in oxbows, gravel and sand, and clay pits and other water bodies. In total, 20 waterbird species were recorded as breeding in Wrocław. The most common were Anas platyrhynchos (145-212 pairs), and Fulica atra (70-104 pairs). Relatively common were also the Gallinula chloropus (28-37 pairs), Rallus aquaticus (9-25 pairs) and Cygnus olor (9-11 pairs). For each remaining species less than 10 pairs were recorded. Among rare species, the following were recorded as breeding in Wrocław: Grus grus, Mergus merganser, and Porzana porzana. In the few recent decades, the increase in the number of breeding pairs was recorded for Anas platyrhynchos and Cygnus olor; while a parallel decrease was recorded for Fulica atra, Gallunula chloropus, Chroicocephalus ridibudnus, and Tachybaptus ruficollis. Species such as the Aythya fuligula, Aythya ferrina, grebes, gulls and terns avoid the city. Some of them even ceased to breed (Anas quarquedula, Anas clypeata and Botaurus stellaris). The city plays an important role in protecting water bird species such as Grus grus, Cygnus olor, Porzana porzana and Alcedo atthis. Key words: urban ornithology, waterbirds, censuses, nature conservation. Introduction Waterbirds are very attractive group of urban fauna, both during the breeding season, on autumn and spring passage, as well as during the winter (Jakubiec 1985; Kalcey, Rheinwald 2005). This group, highly prized as game birds, includes large and colourful species, with very interesting behavior. Many of them are regarded as key umbrella or charismatic species in nature conservation. In this paper, an attempt is taken to assess their numbers and distribution in the largest city in SW Poland. It constitutes a further contribution to the knowledge of birds in the entire area of the city of Wroclaw (Kopij 2008a, 2016a, 2016b, 2017a, 2017b, 2018, Kopij et al. 2009, Kopij & Wawrzyniak 2015). Studies on the numbers and distribution of waterbird species in larger cities in Poland have hitherto been undertaken only in Wrocław (Luniak et al. 2001) and in Łódź (Janiszewski et al. 2009). Due to a large number of ponds, dams, gavel and clay pits, canals and rivers, Wrocław constitutes an environment very attractive to waterbirds. The aim of this work is to investigate numbers and distribution of waterbird species breeding in this city. Study area The city of Wrocław, a capital of Lower Silesia, is situated in the valley of a large river, Odra, where four smaller rivers (rivers of II order: Oława, Ślęża, Bystrzyca and Widawa) join it. The total surface area of Wrocław (within its administrative bounders) is 293 km2. In 2004, human population reached 640 000. The arable grounds comprised 44.8% of the total surface area, forests and other timbered/afforested areas – 5.6%, built-up areas – 18.7%, roads -9.8%, gardens – 3.7%, recreational areas – 6.1%, wastelands – 1.3%. Wetlands and meadows comprise 6.6%, while rivers, canals and all sorts of water bodies – 3.4% of the total surface area (Smolnicki & Szykasiuk 2002). 175 The length of the Odra River within the city Wrocław is 27 km (80 km if all canals are included), Oławy – 19.5 km, Ślęży – 15 km, Bystrzycy – 15 km, and Widawy – 19.5 km. Together - 96 km. Kasina, Łękawica, Toczek, Brochówka, Piskorna comprise smaller river networks. Although Odra is entirely canalized within the city of Wrocław, it forms numerous islands (all under management), meanders, bays, mill-dams etc. In some stretches, banks of the river are covered with narrow belts of reeds and other emergent water plants. Odra leaves the city at 108 m a.s.l. In 1976, there were 326 water bodies in Wrocław, but only 211 of them remained in 1996, and still less remained in 2003-2010. Many of the water bodies are remnants of Odra, Oława, Bystrzyca and Widawa oxbows (e.g. Czarna Woda between Zalesie and Zacisze, ponds in Botanic Garden, Szczytnicki Park, Swojczycki Park and Japanese Garden). There are numerous clay pits scattered all over the city, but these are especially numerous in Fabryczna district (e.g. Żerniki, Muchobór Wielki, Stabłowice, Swojczyce, Maślice Małe). Some industry retention dams were built in Sołtysowice and Klecinia. There are also numerous sewage dams near Rędziny, between Odra and Widawa, and extensive polders with numerous ponds and canals near Świątniki, between Odra and Oława. However, there are no larger waterbodies, such as lakes and water reservoirs. The climate of Wrocław is temperate, slightly warmer than in the neighbouring areas. The mean annual temperature is 9.7˚C, the mean temperature of coldest month (January): -0.5˚C, and the hottest (July): +19.9˚C. The mean annual precipitation – 548 mm; mean humidity – 76%. On average, there are 158 days with rain/snow per year and 1670 hours of sunny weather per year. Snow cover retains for 35 days per year (Bryś & Bryś 2014). Methods Waterbird species are defined as those which are associated with water, both as a foraging and nesting place. Therefore, the following taxonomic groups are included: Podicipediformes, Anseriformes, Charadriiformes and Rallidae. Passerine species nesting in water vegetation are excluded, i.e. Emberiza schoeniclus, Locustella luscinioides, Acrocephalus arundinaceus, Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Luscinia svecica. Excluded are also Circus aeruginosus and Ciconia ciconia. All those species were subjects of other publications (Kopij 2016a, 2017a, 2018, Orłowski et al. 2008). All water and wetland habitats within the city of Wrocław (Fig. 1) were surveyed at least twice: in April/May and in June/July. The whole area of the city was covered during the years 2003-2010. These habitats were surveyed more thoroughly and systematically in the inner part of the city (Kopij 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2014a, 2014b, 2014c, 2016c). In the case of ducks (Anatidae), Cygnus olor, Fulica atra, Galinulla chloropus, grebes (Podicipedidae) and Alcedo atthis, only pairs with nest containing eggs or chicks or adults brooding chicks were regarded as a breeding pair. In the case of Grus grus, Porzana porzana, Charadrius dubius, Actitis hypoleucos and Motacilla cinerea, also individuals performing breeding or territorial behaviour were regarded as breeding pairs. Results and discussion During the years 2003-2010, a total of 20 breeding waterbird species were recorded in the city of Wrocław (Table 1, 2; Fig. 1-10). As expected, the most numerous species was the Mallard Anas platyrhynchos and Coot Fulica atra (Fig. 8). Together they comprised 70- 73% of all breeding pairs of the waterbird species. Relatively numerous were also the Moorhen Gallinula chloropus and Water Rail Rallus aquaticus (Fig. 3). The remaining species nested in a density lower than 10 pairs each in the whole city (Table 1). Waterbird species such as Water Rail, Little Crake Porzana parva, Spotted Crake Porzana porzana could have been underestimated in this study, as they are elusive and active mainly in the night. They are best detected by broadcasting their calls in their potential habitats, which was, however, not carried out in Wrocław. The areas with sewage dams near Rędzin between Odra and Widawa, polders near Świątniki between Odra and Oława and clay pits in Fabryczna district were the most often occupied breeding sites of the waterbirds (Fig. 1-10). Contrary to expectations, most waterbird species were not recorded on Odra River, because the river in entirely canalized with only narrow rows of emergent water vegetation. The Mute Swan was recorded for the first time as a breeding bird in Wrocław in 1984 (Lontkowski et al. 1988). In the following years (1985-87), single pairs nested also in Strachociński Pond and Zakrzów (Dyrcz et al. 1991). During the years 2003-2010, few pairs 176 regularly nested in a few sites in various parts of the city (Fig. 7). Table 1. Number of breeding pairs of water birds in Wrocław (this study), Warsaw (Luniak et al. 2001) and Łódź (Janiszewski et al. 2009). Species Wrocław (293 km2) Warszawa (494 km2) Łódź (293 km2) N pairs/10 km2 N pairs/10 km2 N pairs/10 km2 Cygnus olor 9-11 0.31-0.38 4-7 0.14 2 0.07 Fulica atra 70-104 2.39-3.55 150-200 3.04-4.05 36-50 1.23-1.71 Galinulla chloropus 28-37 0.96-1.26 40-60 0.81-1.21 9-11 0.31 Rallus aquaticus 9-25 0.31-0.85 15-40 0.30-0.81 1 0.03 Podiceps cristatus 6 0.20 10-20 0.20-0.40 0 0.00 Tachybaptus ruficollis 5 0.17 20-30 0.40-0.61 6-9 0.20-0.31 Alcedo atthis 6 0.20 10-15 0.20-0.30 0 0.00 Grus grus 2 0.07 0 0.00 0 0.00 Porzana parva 3 0.10 <5 0.10 0 0.00 Aythya fuligula 2 0.07 5-10 0.10 16-20 0.55-0.68 Aythya ferrina 6 0.20 3-5 0.06 6 0.20 Mergus merganser 2 0.07 5-8 0.10 0 0.00 Anas platyrhynchos 145-212 4.95-7.42 400-600 8.10-12.15 140-200 4.78-6.83 Charadrius dubius 7 0.24 12-20 0.24-0.40 5-6 0.17-0.20 Actitis hypoleucos 1 0.03 5 0.10 0 0.00 Motacilla cinerea 1 0.03 0 0.00 0 0.00 Chroicocephalus ridibundus 2 0.07 200-350 4.05-7.09 0 0.00 Larus canus 1 0.03 10-20 0.20-0.40 0 0.00 Table 2.
Recommended publications
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This
    In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesting Habitat and Breeding Success of Fulica Atra in Tree Wetlands in Fez's Region, Central Morocco
    J Anim Behav Biometeorol (2020) 8:282-287 ISSN 2318-1265 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Nesting habitat and breeding success of Fulica atra in tree wetlands in Fez’s region, central Morocco Wafae Squalli ▪ Ismail Mansouri ▪ Mohamed Dakki ▪ Fatima Fadil W Squalli (Corresponding author) ▪ I Mansouri ▪ F Fadil M Dakki Laboratory of Functional Ecology and Genie of Environment, Laboratory of Geo-biodiversity and Natural Heritage, Faculty of sciences and technology, USMBA, Fez, Morocco. Scientific Institute, Mohammed V University, Av. Ibn Battota, 10 BP 703, Rabat, Morocco. email: [email protected] Received: June 07, 2020 ▪ Accepted: July 15, 2020 ▪ Published Online: August 06, 2020 Abstract The current study was intended to investigate the in part, by interspecific (Fretwell and Lucas 1969; Jones 2001) breeding habitats and ecology of the Eurasian coot Fulica atra and intraspecific interactions (Morris 1989), climate contrast in Fez region Morocco. To achieve our goals, nests were (Martin 2001), and habitat degradation (Feary et al 2007). monitored in three wetlands Oued Al Jawahir river, Mahraz Understanding the dissimilarity between adaptive and and El Gaada dams. In addition, nesting vegetation and nest’s maladaptive animal use of habitat is needed for any dimensions were analysed to characterise the Eurasian coot conservation issue because animal use of inadequate habitat is nests. As results, 46 nests (74%) were found in Oued al counter to conservation drives (Case and Taper 2000). Jawahir, compared with 15 nests (24%) in Mahraz dam. In El Because species conservation worry often occurs in disturbed Gaada dam only 2 nests were built by the Eurasian coots. On habitats (Belaire et al 2014), patterns in habitat use in these the other hand, all nests were built on the riparian vegetation species may not always be revealing of the habitat conditions of the river and dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Determination of Adult Eurasian Coots (Fulica Atra) by Morphometric Measurements Author(S): Piotr Minias Source: Waterbirds, 38(2):191-194
    Sex Determination of Adult Eurasian Coots (Fulica atra) by Morphometric Measurements Author(s): Piotr Minias Source: Waterbirds, 38(2):191-194. Published By: The Waterbird Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1675/063.038.0208 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1675/063.038.0208 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Sex Determination of Adult Eurasian Coots (Fulica atra) by Morphometric Measurements PIOTR MINIAS Department of Teacher Training and Biodiversity Studies, University of Lodz, Banacha 1/3, 90-237 Lodz, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—The aim of this study was to describe the size dimorphism in adult Eurasian Coots (Fulica atra). Ap- propriate discriminant functions to allow efficient sex determination on the basis of morphological measurements were developed. Breeding Eurasian Coots (n = 55) were captured from the urban population in central Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Supporting Information Balk et al. 10.1073/pnas.0902903106 Movie S1. A paralyzed herring gull (Larus argentatus). This movie shows a specimen from the County of So¨ dermanland (region G in Fig. 1). Both wings are equally paralyzed and the beak has no strength, whereas mobility and control of the head still remain. In this work we demonstrate that the probability to remedy an individual in this condition by thiamine treatment is very high. The movie is taken in the field, but the specimen is placed on a black tablecloth in order to remove disturbing background and enhance contrast. Movie S1 (AVI) Other Supporting Information Files SI Appendix Balk et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0902903106 1of1 Supporting Information Wild birds of declining European species are dying from a thiamine deficiency syndrome L. Balk*, P.-Å. Hägerroth, G. Åkerman, M. Hanson, U. Tjärnlund, T. Hansson, G. T. Hallgrimsson, Y. Zebühr, D. Broman, T. Mörner, H. Sundberg *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Pages M & M Materials and Methods. 2–10 Text S1 Additional bird species affected by the paralytic disease. 11 Text S2 Additional results for eggs. 12–13 Text S3 Results for liver body index (LBI) in pulli. 14–15 Text S4 Breeding output and population estimates. 16–18 Text S5 Elaborated discussion of important aspects. 19–27 Acknowl. Further acknowledgements. 28 Fig. S1 a–j The 83 locations where samples were collected. 29–30 Fig. S2 a–d Pigmentation changes in the iris of the herring gull (Larus argentatus). 31 Fig. S3 Liver α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (KGDH) in common black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus).
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of Non-Breeding Wildfowl Anatidae and Coot Fulica Atra on the Perthois Gravel Pits, Northeast France
    68 Diet of non-breeding wildfowl Anatidae and Coot Fulica atra on the Perthois gravel pits, northeast France JEAN-BAPTISTE MOURONVAL1, MATTHIEU GUILLEMAIN1, AURELIEN CANNY2 & FREDERIK POIRIER3 1Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, CNERA Avifaune Migratrice, La Tour du Valat, Le Sambuc, 13200 Arles, France. Email: [email protected] 2Champagne Ardenne Nature Environnement, Musée du Pays du Der, 51290 Sainte Marie du Lac, France. 3Syndicat Mixte d’Aménagement Touristique du Lac du Der, Maison du Lac, 51290 Giffaumont Champaubert, France. Abstract Gravel pits are important habitats for wintering waterbirds, yet food selection by wildfowl wintering at these wetlands has seldom been studied. Here we describe the diet of eight dabbling and diving duck species, and also of Coot Fulica atra, at the Perthois gravel pits in northeast France. The pits form part of a broader Ramsar area and are in themselves of national importance for several Anatidae. From 343 guts collected, the gross diet of the nine bird species corresponded to that reported in the literature for these waterbirds on other types of inland wetlands, though Pochard Ayhtya ferina were almost exclusively granivorous here whereas earlier studies found that they fed more on invertebrates. All nine bird species ingested seeds, often in abundance, though in addition to Pochard only Teal Anas crecca and Mallard A. platyrhynchos could be considered as being true granivores. Two species (Spiny Naiad Naïas marina and Small Pondweed Potamogeton pusillus) were consistently among the most consumed seeds in eight out of nine bird species. The importance of these plant species may be typical to gravel pit in this study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Chapter 11 Wetland Conservation Plan
    CHAPTER 11 CHAPTER 11 WETLAND CONSERVATION PLAN 11.1 Wetland Management Conditions 11.1.1 Natural Parks and Reserves (1) Legal conditions for natural parks and reserves 1) National environmental policy The National Environmental Policy Plan (NEPP) for Latvia was accepted by the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia in 1995. NEPP reflects long-term strategy (25~30 years), and has two long-term goals, i) maintenance and protection of existing biodiversity and landscape characteristics of Latvia, and ii) sustainable use of natural resources. 2) National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) Since Latvia is a country with limited institutional, human, and financial resources, NEAP is incorporated with the National Biodiversity Strategy and the Action Plan, and it will also incorporate implementation of the Ramsar Strategic Plan. NEAP was adopted in 1997, and it emphasizes an establishment of administrative bodies for the Kemeri national park and Lake Engure which include several internationally important wetlands. An elaboration of the Integrated Management Plan for the Lubana Wetland Complex (LWC) is also placed high priority of nature conservation action. 3) Environmental laws and regulations Latvian environmental legal system has been prepared rapidly, and the following laws are relevant to protected areas, especially wetlands. a. The Environmental Protection Law (1991, 1997) determines the general environmental protection objectives, i.e. to ensure preservation of the genetic basis of nature, diversity of biotopes and landscape. It is an umbrella law on nature protection including land use and protection area planning. b. The Law on Specially Protected Nature Areas (1993, 1997) regulates the categories of protected natural areas, the procedure of their establishment and protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Sora Rail in Stilly and the Identification of Immature Small Crakes D
    Sora Rail in Stilly and the identification of immature small crakes D. I. M. Wallace The immature Sora Rail Porzana Carolina present on St Agnes, Isles of Scilly, from 26th September to 9th October 1973 (Brit. Birds, 67: 320; Scilly Bird Report for IQ73'- 19-21) was the first to be recorded in Europe since 1920. The record was accepted by both the Rarities Committee and the Records Committee of the British Ornithologists' Union, and the species was once again listed in category A of the British and Irish list (Ibis, 116: 578). This short paper, which stems from the decision to publish in this journal the details of records that result in category promotion, also includes some comparative notes on immature small crake identification. DETAILS OF THE SORA RAIL IN SCILLY The bird was first seen in the rushes of the Big Pool by D. Smallshire, but early opinions on its identity were hopelessly divided. DS, A. R. Dean and B. R. Dean persisted in seeing slight but distinct differences from the closely related Spotted Crake P. porzana, the species to which others ascribed the bird on the basis of its noticeably buff under tail. The literature available at the time implied that this was a character only of the Spotted Crake and the controversy might have remained unresolved but for the arrival of fresh, open- minded observers, some already familiar with Sora Rails. A phone call from DS to DIMW on 7th produced redoubled efforts at identification. Close attention had already been paid to the bird by B.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Porzana porzana (Spotted Crake) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Porzana porzana (Spotted Crake) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4
    [Show full text]