arXiv:1907.03602v3 [quant-ph] 12 Nov 2020 etgtn ag-cl oeetsrcue.Ti spossi- is This in- structures. and coherent designing large-scale when vestigating neglected phe- commonly emergent are the nomena su- Nevertheless, high-temperature [23–25]. layered perconductors from emission co- and THz [22] herent in arrays oscillator dynamical observed micromechanical synchro- include in [21], be nization Examples condensates Bose-Einstein not driven in can 20]. phases [19, which systems dynamics, smaller phenom- their emergent in demonstrate ena to tend elements tional [18]. structures and quantum times) of quantum up decoherence scaling unit their the of increasing improvement (e.g., the elements both requires erally thermalization corre- and entanglement [13–17]. the of roles [8–12] relative and counterparts the quantum and the systems their between in classical dynamics link sponding in the behaviour as [5–7], such chaotic problem physics, measurement fundamental the of investigation the also They allow [1–4]. computing quantum and quantum to communication sensing, in expected e.g., ions) super- applications, and revolutionary (e.g., have atoms units trapped quantum qubits, controllable conducting moderate-to- of of arrays creation large routine coherent the allowed quantum has of systems measurement and control rication, ti nw htlressescmrsn ayfunc- many comprising systems large that known is It gen- technologies quantum modern of deployment The fab- the for techniques experimental in progress Recent mrec n oto fCmlxBhvor nDie Syste Driven in Behaviours Complex of Control and Emergence 3 colo hsc n srnm,Uiest fNottingham, of University Astronomy, and Physics of School ytmszsahgl tcatc a rmequilibrium, exh from far system stochastic, two-element highly a a Surprisingly, R sizes or system qubits elements. (e.g., of elements quantum number understood. several well of topical. yet system not especially driven are is phenomena emergent driving related external and and corr decoherence quantum multiparticle of inte of strong Analysis when dynamics non-perturbative. nonequilibrium their of tigation rv sfli h ein hrceiainadcnrlof control s and relatively characterization a design, between by the transitions controlled in the are useful of prove transitions terms These in system regimes. quantum large possibili the a indicate efficiently of results be our by can provided dynamics insights proporti chaotic The system, these the that of demonstrate size we the with scales systematically ainlUiest fSineadTcnlg II,4Leni 4 MISIS, Technology and Science of University National 2 rgesi h raino ag cl,atfiilqatmc quantum artificial scale, large of creation the in Progress eateto hsc,Luhoog nvriy Loughbor University, Loughborough Physics, of Department INTRODUCTION .V Andreev V. A. 1 nooi nvriy nvriesaaSr ,Innopolis 1, Str. Universitetskaya University, Innopolis .E Hramov E. A. 4 eateto hoeia hsc n unu Technologie Quantum and Physics Theoretical of Department ∗ orsodn uhr .aoknlooa.kand [email protected] author: Corresponding 1 .G Balanov G. A. , + orsodn uhr [email protected] author: Corresponding 1 .Li W. , uiswt Dissipation with Qubits Dtd oebr1,2020) 13, November (Dated: 3 .V Makarov V. V. , 2 , + .M Fromhold M. T. , ihteices ftesse ie(.. ubrof number (e.g., emergent by size played is change system its phenomena. scales in the role dynamics what of the and qubits), how increase is important the tackled One with be systems. to novel question frame- these open theoretical convenient studying a for of absence work the to due bly essc sRdegmlcls unu information detectors. quantum and molecules, sys- simulators quantum Rydberg processors, of as control and such will design tems the which for of structures, important dynamics coherent be the quantum into driving insights the artificial external new of large give an tuning results applying by Our by either force. or controlled con- parameters, be in system to that, it hyper- of show allows origin We chaos deterministic the thermalisation, equilibrium. the to from trast though far even is has thermalisation system Hyperchaos resemble that exponents. hyper- Lyapunov features two positive as by characterized more known regime or phenomenon dynamical a a emerges, with elements chaos systems more in demon- or Remarkably, can five elements behaviour. chain short chaotic four a strate and even two that find between We comprising 1a]. dissipation of [Fig. with dephasing chain and systems driven quantum a two-level of interacting dynamics far-from-equilibrium the eadesteeqetosb tdigtheoretically studying by questions these address We hyperchaotic yo eue ecito o h behaviour the for description reduced a of ty nlyt h ubro lmns Finally, elements. of number the to onally ltosi ag ytmi h presence the in system large a in elations ag rica unu structures. quantum artificial large tl,tesaigbhvoro dynamics of behaviour scaling the Still, atos vnbtenrmt at,are parts, remote between even ractions, alnme fprmtr,wihmay which parameters, of number mall 1 degaos hne ihincreasing with changes atoms) ydberg .M Zagoskin M. A. , hrn tutrsdmnsteinves- the demands structures oherent otnhmN72D ntdKingdom United 2RD, NG7 Nottingham eivsiaehwtednmc fa of dynamics the how investigate We otoldb eidcdiigfield. driving periodic a by controlled bt hoi eaius o larger For behaviours. chaotic ibits uhL1 T,Uie Kingdom United 3TU, LE11 ough syAe,Mso 109 Russia 119049, Moscow Ave., nsky t ulttvl ieetdynamical different qualitatively its 3 .T Greenaway T. M. , eieeegs t complexity Its emerges. regime 250 Russia 420500, , 2 s, , 4 , ∗ so Interacting of ms 2 , 2
RESULTS partially quantum coherent system, for which it has been shown accurately to describe experimental measurements Mathematical model on qubits, up to the corrections due to two-point correla- tions [38, 42–45]. In such a case, the quantum coherence Here, we investigate the dynamics of a 1D chain of between spatially separated elements is disrupted, e.g. N qubits driven by an external electromagnetic field in by local ambient noise [46]. the presence of decoherence. The system under con- Rewriting the factorized density matrix ρ in terms of sideration is equivalent to a system of Rydberg atoms, the population inversion of the jth qubit, wj = (ρj )11 − ∗ by rescaling and reidentification of parameters [26–31]. (ρj )00, and its coherence, qj = (ρj )10 = (ρj )01, yields:
Along with superconducting structures, Rydberg systems w˙ j = −2Ωℑqj − (wj + 1); provide a controllable testbed for studying fundamen- tal quantum dynamics [32–34] and for developing new 1 Ω q˙j = i ∆ − c (wk + 1) qj − qj + i wj . (4) quantum chemistry [35–37]. In particular, arrays of Ry- 2 2 Xk6=j dberg atoms can be controlled experimentally with very high precision [38–40]. Each atom has a ground state In (4) the dimensionless time τ = γt (i.e.x ˙ ≡ dx/dτ = −1 |gi and an electronically excited high-energy Rydberg γ dx/dt), Ω=ΩR/γ,∆= δω/γ, and c = V a/γ, where state |ei [Fig. 1b]. Rydberg states have large polariz- a is the lattice constant. In more detail the derivation of ability ∼ n7 (where n is the principal quantum number), (4) is discussed in Section A in Supplementary Materials. which generates strong and long-range interactions be- tween atoms [41]. To model an electromagnetically driven array of qubits Emergence of chaos and hyperchaos (Rydberg atoms), we use the Hamiltonian Here we study the dynamical regimes of chains of inter- N ΩR acting qubits. To characterise the complexity (random- H = −δω|eihe|j + (|eihg|j + |gihe|j ) (1) 2 ness) of the emergent chaos and hyperchaos we calculate Xj=1 the full spectrum of the Lyapunov exponents [47]. + Vi,j |eihe|j ⊗ |eihe|k, First we analyze two coupled qubits (N = 2). Pre- Xj
5. This diagram was built by calculating the spectrum attractor. Accumulation of the corresponding bifurca- of Lyapunov exponents for the various limit sets that tions causes the second Lyapunov exponent to become exist in the (∆, Ω)-plane. When all the Lyapunov ex- positive. ponents are negative, there is a stable equilibrium state We find that period-doubling is the most common, but (white in the diagram). If the largest Lyapunov expo- not the only, route to chaos exhibited by the system. nent equals 0 the oscillations are periodic (cyan). If the Figure 2a reveals some direct transitions from the red largest two Lyapunov exponents are both 0, the dynam- region where the dynamics is quasiperiodic to the green ics are quasiperiodic (red). However, when one or two region where the dynamics are chaotic. This behaviour Lyapunov exponents are positive, there is chaos (green) can indicate the mechanism of torus destruction for the or hyperchaos (black), respectively. transition to chaos . However, we did not specifically Figure 2b illustrates the bifurcation transitions be- investigate the effect of this particular mechanism on the tween the different dynamical regimes when Ω = 2.5 and development of hyperchaos. ∆ changes along the yellow dashed line in Fig. 2a. The The dynamics of N = 5 coupled qubits in different blue curves represent the evolution of the four largest dynamical regimes is exemplified in Fig. 3. Typical peri- Lyapunov exponents Λ1 >Λ2 >Λ3 >Λ4. A number of odic solution is presented in Fig. 3a. Here, n = 1,..., 5 distinctive phases emerge as we increase ∆ from 1 to 9. denotes the qubit number in the chain, t is time, and the The stable equilibrium state, which exists for small ∆, color scale indicates the value of wn. All qubits oscillate switches to a periodic solution as a result of an Andronov- with the same frequency, but with different phases. How- Hopf bifurcation at ∆ ≈ 1.7, where Λ1 becomes zero. At ever, the phase shift is constant for each pair of qubits, ∆ ≈ 3.55 the periodic oscillations lose their stability via meaning that they are synchronized. The latter is also a Neimark-Sacker bifurcation, resulting in the onset of indicated by the clearly periodic pattern in Fig. 3a. The quasiperiodic oscillations (Λ1 = Λ2 = 0). Increasing ∆ quasiperiodic regime when ∆ = 3.73 is shown in Fig. further leads to chaotic dynamics. 3b. Now the phase shifts between oscillations of different To better illustrate the transition to the chaotic qubits are no longer constant, and the periodic pattern of regime, in Fig. 2c we present a zoom of the region of the spatio-temporal dynamics is lost, reflecting the loss Fig. 2b framed by the black rectangle. The correspond- of synchronization. ing bifurcation diagram, shown in Fig. 2d, is constructed Chaotic oscillations for ∆ = 4.05 are illustrated in Fig. by plotting the points corresponding to the local maxima 3c. Here, the qubit chain demonstrates erratic behav- w1,max in the time evolution of w1(t), calculated for given ior, which is in marked contrast to the ordered dynamics ∆. For a particular value of ∆, periodic solutions are presented in Figs. 3a and b. Figure 3d shows typical represented by one or few single dots on the graph, while hyperchaotic oscillations calculated for ∆ ≈ 4.95. In this the complex sets of many points for a specific ∆ reflect regime, the oscillations in the chain become even more quasiperiodic or chaotic dynamics. As ∆ increases, the complicated than the chaotic behavior in Fig. 3c, and quasiperiodic oscillations where Λ1 =Λ2 = 0 [Fig. 2c] are now demonstrate no specific time-scales in wn(t). The replaced (at ∆ ≈ 3.732) by complex periodic oscillations hyperchaotic behavior persists up to ∆ ≈ 8.0, after which due to saddle-node bifurcation. These periodic oscilla- it rapidly switches to chaotic and then periodic solutions. tions are characterized by Λ1 =0 and Λ2,3 < 0 [Fig. 2c] For ∆ > 8.53, all oscillations disappear, and all long-term and represented in Fig. 2d by few isolated dots for a solutions in the system correspond to stable equilibrium. fixed ∆. For ∆ & 3.744, the periodic solutions undergo In order to further examine the presence of the multi- a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations giving rise to stability in the dynamics of the chain, we return to the chaos with one positive Lyapunov exponent at ∆ ≈ 3.75 evolution of the Lyapunov exponents as ∆ changes from [Fig. 2c]. The period-doubling bifurcations do not affect 9 down to 1. Values of Λ1,2,3,4 for this case are shown the spectrum of Lyapunov exponents of the stable solu- red in Fig. 2b. The plot shows that the stable homoge- tion, since the latter remains periodic. However, each neous steady state (Λ1 =Λ2 =Λ3 =Λ4< 0) exists down period-doubling causes additional Lyapunov exponent to to ∆ ≈ 5.491, where it suddenly changes to hyperchaotic approach zero [Fig. 2c], which manifests itself via dou- oscillations. Thus, within the interval of ∆ between 5.491 bling of the number of dots in Fig. 2d. Thus for N = 5, and 9.0 the homogeneous fixed point co-exists with dif- the bifurcation mechanism leading to the onset of chaos ferent inhomogeneous regimes including other types of stays the same as for the case of N=2. Further investiga- equilibria, periodic and quasiperiodic oscillations, chaos tion shows that this mechanism is also present at larger and hyperchaos [blue graphs in Fig. 2b]. Multistability N. therefore appears to be a generic phenomenon, existing Increasing ∆ makes the chaotic oscillations more com- in chains of different size. plicated and leads to the gradual development of hyper- Analysis of chains with N > 5 reveals that hyperchaos chaos, which emerges at ∆ ≈ 4.4 [see Fig. 2b]. This tran- is not only preserved in the system, but becomes more sition is linked to further instability of already unstable complicated as more Lyapunov exponents become posi- periodic orbits, which form the skeleton of the chaotic tive. The results of our analysis are summarized in Fig. 4
4, where the number of positive Lyapunov exponents, Chaos control via a coherent driving field M, is shown as a function of the number of qubits in the chain. The graph shows an almost linear growth, at a rate This dynamical complexity has a deterministic origin, suggesting that adding two or three qubits leads to the which could be controlled (suppressed or enhanced) by an appearance of an additional positive Lyapunov exponent. applied external field. Previously, it was demonstrated This phenomenon originates from a weak correlation be- that a periodic perturbation can suppress hyperchaos tween the oscillations in distant qubits. As a result, the with two positive Lyapunov exponents [51, 52]. Here, we addition of a subsystem, comprising two or more qubits apply a periodic modulation to the laser field amplitude is able to demonstrate chaotic dynamics and adds one which modulates the Rabi frequency: more positive value to the spectrum of the Lyapunov ex- ponents. Since, for a given coupling, the smallest chaotic Ω=Ωm[1 + M sin(2πft)]. (5) subsystem comprises two qubits, their inclusion produces where Ωm is the amplitude of the Rabi frequency, whilst one more positive Lyapunov exponent. The number of M and f are the modulation index and the frequency Lyapunov exponents grows roughly proportionally to the of modulation, respectively. We consider the case when number N of qubits rather than with the dimensionality N = 15, a large but practically feasible number of qubits N 2 of the Hilbert space of the system. This indicates the such that the system shows hyperchaos, characterized by possibility of a reduced description of its dynamics. In four positive Lyapunov exponents and a broadband spec- such a case the transitions between qualitatively differ- trum. Figure 6 presents the eleven largest conditional ent, distinct dynamical regimes are controlled by a rel- Lyapunov exponents (a) and the corresponding bifurca- atively small number of independent dimensionless pa- tion digram (b) calculated for Ωm =2.5, c =5,∆=5.0, rameters. M =0.684 and f changing from 0 to 1.8. Due to the periodic modulation, chaos is suppressed in certain parameter regiones. For f between 0.7 and For large N, multiple positive Lyapunov exponents 0.8 we find complex periodic oscillations characterized by make the oscillations very complicated, demonstrating the largest Lyapunov exponent less then 0 [see Fig. 6a] broadband continuous spectra, which are similar to ran- and multiple branches in the bifurcation diagram [Fig. dom fluctuations in solids [49, 50]. In addition, we found 6b]. Within the interval f ∈ (0.9, 1.1) we find period- out that these hyperchaotic phenomena are preserved for one oscillations (one maxima per period) and Lyapunov non-identical qubits and open chains, as well as in chains exponents ≪ 0, corresponding to highly stable regular with more complex qubit-coupling topology than those oscillations in this regime. In addition, the same con- discussed above. The spatial correlations, the spectra trolling signal is able to significantly increase the com- of the chain oscillations calculated for different numbers plexity of hyperchaotic oscillations and a corresponding of qubits, and Lyapunov analysis of chains with non- increase in the value of the largest Lyapunov exponent. identical qubits and more complex topology are discussed For example, when f ≈ 0.3 the largest Lyapunov expo- in Sections C and D in Supplementary Materials. nent becomes almost three time larger than in the case without the application of the signal (f = 0). Other- wise the number of positive Lyapunov exponents can be To study the significance of the system’s dimensional- increased by 1 (f = 1.2) or 2 (f = 1.4). Our results ity, we analyze 2D L × L lattices of L2 interacting qubits demonstrate that periodic modulation of laser field am- (Fig. 5a). As for 1D rings, these square lattices exhibit plitude can be used as an efficient method to control very chaotic (for 2×2 lattices) and hyperchaotic behavior (for complex hyperchaos in qubit arrays. 3 × 3 and larger lattices). Figure 5c illustrates the Lya- punov exponents spectrum for a 3 × 3 square lattice. We observe two areas (2.7 < ∆ < 3.8 and ∆ ≈ 5.8) DISCUSSION of chaos, one small area of hyperchaos with two positive Lyapunov exponents (∆ ≈ 4.2), and two areas of hyper- We have shown that the interplay between dissipa- chaos with three positive exponents (4.4 < ∆ < 5.3 and tion and energy pumping in quantum systems compris- 6.05 < ∆ < 7.6). Therefore for a lattice of 9 qubits we ing chains of qubits can produce highly nontrivial emer- observe a complicated behavior with three positive Lya- gent phenomena associated with the onset of complex punov exponents, which is similar behavior to that we chaotic and hyperchaotic oscillations even in the absence observe for a ring of 9 qubits. We investigate lattices of multi-particle entanglement. The complexity of the with several values of L of nodes and and find almost lin- hyperchaos increases with the number of elements in ear growth of the number of positive Lyapunov exponents the chain. The number of positive Lyapunov exponents with increasing the number of qubits in the lattice (see grows linearly with the number of qubits, that is, as only Fig. 5b). We can conclude that emergence of hyperchaos log of the dimensionality of the Hilbert space. This in- does not depend on the dimensionality of the system. dicates the possibility of a reduced description of the 5 quantum system by a small (in comparison to the di- ment 3N perturbations vectors, where N is the number mensionality of the Hilbert space) number of dimension- of units in the system, and use periodic Gram-Schmidt less parameters. This observation is consistent with the orthonormalization of the Lyapunov vectors to avoid a fact that the manifold of all quantum states that can be misalignment of all the vectors along the direction of generated by arbitrary time-dependent local Hamiltoni- maximal expansion [61, 62]. ans in a polynomial time occupies an exponentially small volume in the Hilbert space of the system[53]. Our results demonstrate a mechanism for randomiz- Bifurcation diagrams ing the evolution of coupled qubits, which arises due to dynamical phenomena far from equilibrium and is thus In order to construct a bifurcation diagram we plot the unrelated to thermalization processes despite the super- points corresponding to the local maxima w1,max in the ficial similarity. The model we have used is generic and time-evolution of w1(t), calculated for given ∆ and Ω. can be applied and implemented directly in, e.g., chains of qubits or electromagnetically driven superconducting qubits. Our results will be important for the development DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT of large quantum systems, where multi-point entangle- ment is neither required nor supported [42, 43, 54]. In The data that support the findings of this study are particular, they suggest a controllable way of switching available from the corresponding authors upon reason- between different dynamical regimes via regular to chaos able request. transitions either by tuning the parameters of the system or by applying a controlling signal via modulation of laser field amplitude, as another approach towards controlling CODE AVAILABILITY STATEMENT quantum state dynamics [55]. Our results are of interest for the development of quantum random number gener- All code used in the paper are available from the cor- ators [56] and quantum chaotic cryptography [57, 58]. A responding authors upon reasonable request. natural extension of this research will consider the effect of interqubit entanglement on the complexity revealed here, and whether it can be utilised for controlling this ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS far-from-equilibrium behavior. Another interesting task will be to study how quantum A.M.Z. and A.G.B. thank Prof. S. Watabe for illu- signatures of classical chaos such as the growth rate of minating discussions. This work was supported in part out-of-time-ordered correlators [59] behave in the pres- by EPSRC (grant EP/M006581/1), the grant from the ence of hyperchaos. Preliminary results on the integra- Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian tion of the original quantum model (2), briefly discussed Federation in the framework of Increase Competitiveness in Section E in Supplementary Materials, indicate that Program of NUST MISiS, Grant No. K2-2020-001 and the complexity of chain dynamics depends highly non- Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) 18-32- trivially on the parameters of the Hamiltonian (1). How- 20135. W.L. acknowledges support from the UKIERI- ever, a detailed analysis of the dynamical regimes and UGC Thematic Partnership No. IND/CONT/G/16- their characteristics in the presence of entanglement, and 17/73, EPSRC Grant No. EP/R04340X/1, and support especially of the question about the universality of these from the University of Nottingham. regimes and parameters that control them, requires ex- tensive further research, which we hope this paper will stimulate. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.M.Z., A.G.B. and A.E.H. conceived, designed and METHODS supervised the project. The theoretical calculations were performed by A.M.Z. (analytical) and A.V.A., V.V.M., Lyapunov exponents calculation A.E.H. and A.G.B. (numerical). A.G.B., T.M.F., M.T.G., W.L. and A.M.Z. wrote the manuscript. All The Lyapunov exponents were calculated for the stable authors discussed the results and contributed to the limit sets, which correspond to the solutions of the model manuscript. equations as time t → ∞. Since we apply the periodic modulation (5) to the system (4), the Lyapunov expo- nents we calculate in this case are called conditional and COMPETING INTERESTS missing one zero exponent, unlike the common Lyapunov exponents spectrum [60]. To determine them, we imple- The authors declare no competing interests. 6
[22] Zhang, M., Shah, S., Cardenas, J. & Lipson, M. Synchro- nization and phase noise reduction in micromechanical oscillator arrays coupled through light. Physical Review [1] Walport, M. & Knight, P. The quantum age: technolog- Letters 115, 163902 (2015). ical opportunities (2016). [23] Ozyuzer, L. et al. Emission of coherent THz radiation [2] Georgescu, I. & Nori, F. Quantum technologies: an old from superconductors. Science 318, 1291–1293 (2007). new story. Physics World 25, 16 (2012). [24] Savel'ev, S., Yampol'skii, V., Rakhmanov, A. & Nori, F. [3] Knight, P. & Walmsley, I. UK national quantum tech- Terahertz Josephson plasma waves in layered supercon- nology programme. Quantum Science and Technology 4, ductors: spectrum, generation, nonlinear and quantum 040502 (2019). phenomena. Reports on Progress in Physics 73, 026501 [4] Ac´ın, A. et al. The quantum technologies roadmap: a (2010). European community view. New Journal of Physics 20, [25] Welp, U., Kadowaki, K. & Kleiner, R. Superconducting 080201 (2018). emitters of THz radiation. Nature Photonics 7, 702–710 [5] Zurek, W. H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- (2013). tum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics [26] Weimer, H., M¨uller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. & 75, 715 (2003). B¨uchler, H. P. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nature [6] Zurek, W. H. Quantum darwinism. Nature Physics 5, Physics 6, 382–388 (2010). 181–188 (2009). [27] Lee, T. E., H¨affner, H. & Cross, M. Antiferromagnetic [7] Xiong, H.-N., Lo, P.-Y., Zhang, W.-M., Nori, F. et al. phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of Rydberg Non-markovian complexity in the quantum-to-classical atoms. Physical Review A 84, 031402 (2011). transition. Scientific Reports 5, 13353 (2015). [28] Lee, T. E., Haeffner, H. & Cross, M. Collective quantum [8] Lambert, N., Chen, Y.-n., Johansson, R. & Nori, F. jumps of Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Letters 108, Quantum chaos and critical behavior on a chip. Phys- 023602 (2012). ical Review B 80, 165308 (2009). [29] Ostrovskaya, E. A. & Nori, F. Giant Rydberg excitons: [9] Aßmann, M., Thewes, J., Fr¨ohlich, D. & Bayer, M. Quan- Probing quantum chaos. Nature materials 15, 702–703 tum chaos and breaking of all anti-unitary symmetries in (2016). Rydberg excitons. Nature Materials 15, 741–745 (2016). [30] Labuhn, H. et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of sin- [10] Fiderer, L. J. & Braun, D. Quantum metrology with gle Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models. quantum-chaotic sensors. Nature Communications 9, 1– Nature 534, 667–670 (2016). 9 (2018). [31] Minganti, F., Miranowicz, A., Chhajlany, R. W. & Nori, [11] Gao, T. et al. Observation of non-Hermitian degeneracies F. Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamil- in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard. Nature 526, 554– tonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps. 558 (2015). Physical Review A 100, 062131 (2019). [12] Zhu, G.-L. et al. Single-photon-triggered quantum chaos. [32] Bendkowsky, V. et al. Observation of ultralong-range Physical Review A 100, 023825 (2019). Rydberg molecules. Nature 458, 1005–1008 (2009). [13] Chaudhury, S., Smith, A., Anderson, B., Ghose, S. & [33] L¨ow, R. Rydberg atoms: two to tango. Nature Physics Jessen, P. S. Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked 10, 901–902 (2014). top. Nature 461, 768–771 (2009). [34] Basak, S., Chougale, Y. & Nath, R. Periodically driven [14] Zhang, W., Sun, C. & Nori, F. Equivalence condition for array of single Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Letters the canonical and microcanonical ensembles in coupled 120, 123204 (2018). spin systems. Physical Review E 82, 041127 (2010). [35] Butscher, B. et al. Atom–molecule coherence for [15] Neill, C. et al. Ergodic dynamics and thermalization in ultralong-range Rydberg dimers. Nature Physics 6, 970– an isolated quantum system. Nature Physics 12, 1037– 974 (2010). 1041 (2016). [36] Niederpr¨um, T. et al. Observation of pendular butter- [16] Turner, C. J., Michailidis, A. A., Abanin, D. A., Serbyn, fly Rydberg molecules. Nature Communications 7, 1–6 M. & Papi´c, Z. Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum (2016). many-body scars. Nature Physics 14, 745–749 (2018). [37] Eiles, M. T., Tong, Z. & Greene, C. H. Theoretical pre- [17] Lewis-Swan, R., Safavi-Naini, A., Bollinger, J. J. & Rey, diction of the creation and observation of a ghost trilo- A. M. Unifying scrambling, thermalization and entangle- bite chemical bond. Physical Review Letters 121, 113203 ment through measurement of fidelity out-of-time-order (2018). correlators in the dicke model. Nature Communications [38] Zeiher, J. et al. Coherent many-body spin dynamics in a 10, 1–9 (2019). long-range interacting ising chain. Physical Review X 7, [18] Dowling, J. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum technology: 041063 (2017). the second quantum revolution. Philosophical Transac- [39] Labuhn, H. et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of sin- tions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathe- gle Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models. matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, 1655– Nature 534, 667–670 (2016). 1674 (2003). [40] Barredo, D. et al. Coherent excitation transfer in a spin [19] Hegel, G. W. F. The Science of Logic (Cambridge Uni- chain of three Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Letters versity Press, 2015). 114, 113002 (2015). [20] Engels, F. Anti-D¨uhring Herr Eugen D¨uhring’s revolu- [41] Saffman, M., Walker, T. G. & Mølmer, K. Quantum tion in science (Progress Publishers, 1969). information with Rydberg atoms. Reviews of Modern [21] Piazza, F. & Ritsch, H. Self-ordered limit cycles, chaos, Physics 82, 2313 (2010). and phase slippage with a superfluid inside an optical [42] Zagoskin, A., Rakhmanov, A., Savel’ev, S. & Nori, resonator. Physical Review Letters 115, 163601 (2015). F. Quantum metamaterials: Electromagnetic waves in 7
josephson qubit lines. physica status solidi (b) 246, 955– [53] Poulin, D., Qarry, A., Somma, R. & Verstraete, F. Quan- 960 (2009). tum simulation of time-dependent Hamiltonians and the [43] Macha, P. et al. Implementation of a quantum metama- convenient illusion of Hilbert space. Physical Review Let- terial using superconducting qubits. Nature Communi- ters 106, 170501 (2011). cations 5, 1–6 (2014). [54] Fitzpatrick, M., Sundaresan, N. M., Li, A. C., Koch, J. [44] Gaul, C. et al. Resonant Rydberg dressing of alkaline- & Houck, A. A. Observation of a dissipative phase tran- earth atoms via electromagnetically induced trans- sition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice. Physical parency. Physical Review Letters 116, 243001 (2016). Review X 7, 011016 (2017). [45] Zeiher, J. et al. Many-body interferometry of a Rydberg- [55] Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-x., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K. & Nori, dressed spin lattice. Nature Physics 12, 1095–1099 F. Quantum feedback: theory, experiments, and appli- (2016). cations. Physics Reports 679, 1–60 (2017). [46] Aolita, L., De Melo, F. & Davidovich, L. Open-system [56] Herrero-Collantes, M. & Garcia-Escartin, J. C. Quantum dynamics of entanglement: a key issues review. Reports random number generators. Reviews of Modern Physics on Progress in Physics 78, 042001 (2015). 89, 015004 (2017). [47] Anishchenko, V. S. Dynamical Chaos, Models and Ex- [57] Monifi, F. et al. Optomechanically induced stochastic periments: Appearance Routes and Structure of Chaos in resonance and chaos transfer between optical fields. Na- Simple Dynamical Systems (World Scientific Publishing, ture Photonics 10, 399–405 (2016). Singapore, 1995). [58] de Oliveira, G. & Ramos, R. V. Quantum-chaotic [48] Rossler, O. An equation for hyperchaos. Physics Letters cryptography. Quantum Information Processing 17, 40 A 71, 155–157 (1979). (2018). [49] Field, S., Venturi, N. & Nori, F. Marginal stability and [59] Ch´avez-Carlos, J. et al. Quantum and classical Lyapunov chaos in coupled faults modeled by nonlinear circuits. exponents in atom-field interaction systems. Physical Re- Physical Review Letters 74, 74 (1995). view Letters 122, 024101 (2019). [50] Kogan, S. Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids [60] Pyragas, K. Conditional Lyapunov exponents from time (Cambridge University Press, 2008). series. Physical Review E 56, 5183 (1997). [51] Xiao-Hui, Z. & Ke, S. The control action of the periodic [61] Oseledets, V. I. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Char- perturbation on a hyperchaotic system. Acta Physica acteristic Ljapunov, exponents of dynamical systems. Sinica (Overseas Edition) 8, 651 (1999). Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 19, 197–231 (1968). [52] Sun, K., Liu, X., Zhu, C. & Sprott, J. Hyperchaos [62] Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. and hyperchaos control of the sinusoidally forced simpli- Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. fied Lorenz system. Nonlinear Dynamics 69, 1383–1391 Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 16, 285–317 (1985). (2012). 8
(a) (b) V |e 〉 dw g WR
|g 〉
(c) 5 L1 4 0.1 -0.1 3
W -0.3 2 -0.5 1 -0.7 -0.9 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 D
FIG. 1: Schematic representation of interacting qubits and the largest Lyapunov exponent dependence on model parameters for the case of two qubits. a Schematic representation of a circular chain of six interacting quantum units (e.g., Rydberg atoms or qubits), labelled by integer indexes and coupled via nearest neighbor interaction. b Atomic-level configuration reflected in the model [Eqs. (1-3)]. Coherent laser excitation from the ground state |gi to an excited (”Rydberg”) state |ei with a Rabi frequency ΩR and detuning δω, incoherent spontaneous decay γ, and the Rydberg interaction when an excited qubit shifts the transition frequency of a neighboring qubit by V . c Dependence of the largest Lyapunov exponent Λ1 on ∆ and Ω calculated for c = 5 for the system of 2 coupled qubits. The color scale intensity indicates the value of Λ1.
(a) 5
4
(c) L1 3 0.05
W 0 2 L2 L -0.05 1 L3
0 (d) -0.78 (b) -0.81 0.4 L1 1,max
L2 w -0.84 L 0 L3 -0.87
-0.4 L4 3.725 3.735 3.745 3.755 D -0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D
FIG. 2: Hyperchaos in a ring of five qubits. a Map showing areas of (∆, Ω) space corresponding to different regimes of long-term behavior for a ring of five qubits. Black denotes areas of hyperchaos with two positive Lyapunov exponents, green is a region of chaos with one positive Lyapunov exponent, cyan is a periodic regime, red areas correspond to quasiperiodic behavior, white is a steady state regime. b Variation of the four largest Lyapunov exponents with ∆; blue dots correspond to ∆ increasing from 1 to 9, red dots – to ∆ decreasing down to 1. c A zoom of the region of b within the black rectangle. d Single-parametric bifurcation diagram corresponding to c, in which the vertical positions of each point correspond to the local maxima of w1(t). For all figures Ω = 2.5. 9
w (a) (c) n 5 0.0 4 -0.2
n 3 -0.4 2 -0.6 1 -0.8 w (b) (d) n 5 0.0 4 -0.2
n 3 -0.4 2 -0.6 1 -0.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 t t
FIG. 3: Time evolution of wn for 5 qubits. a Periodic [∆ = 3.74], b quasiperiodic [∆ = 3.73], c chaotic [∆ = 4.05] and d hyperchaotic [∆ = 4.95] oscillations; n labels an qubit in the chain.
40
30
M 20 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 N
FIG. 4: Number of positive Lyapunov exponents M vs. number of qubits N in the ring chain. ∆=5,Ω=2.5, c = 5.
(a) (b) L M
j-3 2 1 3 3 j-1 j j+1 4 5
j+3 5 8 6 12 (c) 0.4
0 L
-0.4
-0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D
FIG. 5: 2D L × L lattices of L2 interacting qubits. a Schematic representation of a square lattice of nine interacting quantum units (e.g., Rydberg atoms or qubits), labelled by integer indexes and coupled via nearest neighbor interaction. b Number of positive Lyapunov exponents M vs. lattice size L in the L × L lattice calculated for ∆ = 5, Ω = 2.0, c = 5. c Variation of the eight largest Lyapunov exponents with ∆ for a square lattice of 9 qubits, Ω = 2.0. 10
(a) 0.8
0.4
L 0
-0.4 (b) 0.4
0 1,max
w -0.4 -0.8 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 f
FIG. 6: Chaos control. a Conditional Lyapunov exponents spectrum and b bifurcation diagram for a ring of 15 qubits by means of an external parametric effect for Ωm = 2.5, c = 5, ∆ = 5.0, M = 0.684. Emergence and Control of Complex Behaviours in Driven Systems of Interacting Qubits with Dissipation. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS.
A. V. Andreev 1, A. G. Balanov 2,+, T. M. Fromhold 3, M. T. Greenaway 2, A. E. Hramov 1, W. Li 3, V. V. Makarov 1, A. M. Zagoskin 2,4,∗ 1Innopolis University, Universitetskaya Str. 1, Innopolis, 420500, Russia 2Department of Physics, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, United Kingdom 3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom 4Department of Theoretical Physics and Quantum Technologies, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, 4 Leninsky Ave., Moscow 119049, Russia ∗Corresponding author: [email protected] and +Corresponding author: [email protected]
A. Model of electromagnetically driven interacting Up to the irrelevant total energy shift, ∆ E = qubits with decoherence and dissipation 1 − 2 j ǫj + jk Jjk , and parameter relabeling, this Hamiltonian is an inhomogeneous version of the h P P i The standard description of a set of interacting qubits interaction-representation Hamiltonian of a system of is provided by the Ising Hamiltonian, Rydberg atoms in a laser field [3, 4]. In the mapping of (4) on Eq.(1), δω corresponds to ( ǫj − 2 k Jjk ), i.e., H = Hj + Ujk , (1) the role of detuning is played by the negative of the mean- j j a a b b SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2: (Color online) Single- parametric bifurcation diagram illustrating evolution of sta- ble regimes with variation of ∆. The black dots correspond to SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1: (Color online) a Two- the Poincar´esectionw ˙ 1+w ˙ 2 = 0. b Dependence of the three parametric bifurcation diagram calculated for c = 5. Red largest Lyapunov exponents Λ 1,2,3 on ∆. Both a and b were curve (PB), green curve (HB), yellow curves (PD) and dark- calculated for c = 5 and Ω = 1 .3, along the blue dashed line green curve (SN) are loci of pitch-fork, Andronov-Hopf, in Suppl. Fig. 1a. The shaded area in a marks the region of period-doubling and saddle-node bifurcations, respectively. multistability, cross-hatched areas [in both a and b ] denote The gray scale intensity indicates the value of the largest Lya- the chaos region. punov exponent Λ 1. b Single-parametric bifurcation diagram along the blue dashed line in a for Ω = 1 .3. Black and green points correspond to stable and unstable fixed points, re- spectively; brown/magenta points indicate the maximal value lations emerge/vanish in the system. The yellow curves of w1 corresponding to stable/unstable periodic oscillations. (PD) mark the position of period-doubling bifurcations The red circles (PB), green squares (HB), dark-yellow as- of the periodic oscillations. The dark-cyan curve (SN) terisks (PD) and blue crosses (SN) denote pitchfork, Hopf, period-doubling and saddle-node bifurcation, respectively. In shows the locus of saddle-node bifurcation, which gives both a and b the cross-hatched area marks the region of multi- birth to a pair of stable and saddle fixed points. This stability, where a homogeneous fixed point coexists with other curve encompasses the cross-hatched area of the parame- solutions. ter plane, where the homogeneous fixed point, for which w1 = w2 and q1 = q2, coexists with other equilibrium or oscillatory solutions. The bifurcation lines are su- bifurcation analysis of multiple coupled qubits systems perimposed on a grayscale map illustrating the depen- and on the transitions to the chaotic dynamics found in dence of the largest Lyapunov exponent Λ 1 on ∆ and our investigation. Ω. The Lyapunov exponents were calculated for the sta- ble limit sets, which correspond to the solutions of the model equations as time t → ∞ . To determine them, we B. Dynamics of two qubits utilized the theory and numerical approaches discussed in [5, 6]. The negative values of Λ 1 correspond to the The results of our analysis for two qubits are sum- fixed points (equilibrium states), zero values mean the marized in Suppl. Fig. 1a , where the bifurcation dia- periodic or quasiperiodic solutions, while positive Λ 1 ev- gram in the parameter plane (∆ , Ω) is presented for the idences the presence of deterministic chaos [7]. A tran- coupling parameter c = 5 defined in Eqs. (4) in the sition from white to black in Suppl. Fig. 1a reflects the main text. The red line labeled PB indicates the pitch- change from smaller to larger values of Λ 1. The diagram fork bifurcation, which is associated with the appear- clearly demonstrates the existence of chaotic dynamics ance/disappearance of two stable symmetric fixed points (Λ 1 > 0) in considerable areas of the parameter plane (steady states). The green (HB) line corresponds to the shaded by dark-gray/black colors. onset of the Hopf bifurcation, where stable periodic oscil- To better illustrate the bifurcation transitions, in 3 Suppl. Fig. 1b we present a single-parametric bifurcation a diagram calculated for Ω = 1 .3, i.e. along the blue dashed horizontal line in Suppl. Fig. 1a . Each point on the di- agram corresponds to the maximal value of the variable w1 calculated for a given ∆. The black and green col- ors denote stable and unstable fixed points, respectively, b while brown and magenta points correspond to stable and unstable periodic solutions. With ∆ increasing from a negative value, the homogeneous fixed point undergoes a pitchfork bifurcation at ∆ ≈ − 0.465 (red circle labeled as PB). As a result, it becomes unstable, and in its vicin- c ity a pair of symmetric inhomogeneous fixed points is born. Notably, it was shown in [3] that this bifurca- tion corresponds to phase transition between the uniform and antiferromagnetic phases. With further increase of ∆, each of these inhomogeneous (antiferromagnetic) fixed points loses its stability via the Hopf bifurcation at d ∆ ≈ 1.238 (green square HB), which leads to the appear- ance of stable periodic oscillations (yellow points). In turn, these oscillations become unstable due to another period-doubling bifurcation at ∆ ≈ 1.819 (dark-yellow asterisk PD) giving birth to a stable periodic solution e with doubled period. With varying ∆, these period-two oscillations undergo another period-doubling bifurcation at ∆ ≈ 2.136 leading to the emergence of stable period- four oscillations. This sequence of period-doubling bi- furcations continues with the growth of ∆, producing an infinite set of unstable periodic solutions with different periods. Eventually, this cascade of bifurcations leads to the appearance of chaotic oscillations, which are charac- SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3: Time evolution of w1 (left terized by Λ 1 > 0, at ∆ ≈ 2.17. If ∆ grows even further, panels) and the ( w1, w 2) projection of the phase trajectories the bifurcation scenario discussed above develops in the (right panels) of the stable regimes calculated for Ω = 1 .3, opposite direction. Namely, chaos disappears through c = 5 and a ∆ = 1 .5, b ∆ = 1 .939, c ∆ = 2 .147, d ∆ = 2 .5 the inverse cascade of period-doubling bifurcations that and e ∆ = 2 .76. starts at ∆ ≈ 2.90. This is followed by a Hopf bifur- cation (∆ ≈ 3.322), where the oscillations cease, and then inverse pitch-fork bifurcation (∆ ≈ 3.636), where respond to period-added oscillations and a complex set of symmetric ferromagnetic fixed points merge and annihi- points reflects chaotic behavior. The bifurcation points late, while the homogeneous fixed point becomes stable. PB, HB, PD and SN have the same interpretations as in The homogenous fixed points are involved in a pair of Suppl. Fig. 1b. Since the branches of inhomogeneous so- saddle-node bifurcations (blue crosses SN) at ∆ ≈ 2.756 lutions are symmetric with respect to swapping the state and ∆ ≈ 3.931. This creates folds on the bifurcation variables {ω1, q 1 ⇔ ω2, q 2}, for simplicity, Suppl. Fig. 2a diagram, which suggests hysteresis and forms a region shows only one branch of inhomogeneous solutions. of bistability (shaded area), where a homogeneous fixed For comparison, Suppl. Fig. 2b shows the three largest point (black dots in the lower part of the diagram) co- Lyapunov exponents, Λ 1 >Λ2 >Λ3, calculated for the exists with other solutions (black or brown points in the same range of ∆ as in Suppl. Fig. 2a . One can see upper part of the diagram). that in the vicinity of every bifurcation point, one of the Supplementary Figure 2a demonstrates how the stable Lyapunov exponents approaches zero thus signaling the solutions of the model equations evolve with varying ∆. development of instability. For small values of ∆, before The diagram exhibits the points of a Poincar´esection of the point HB, all the Lyapunov exponents are negative, phase trajectories calculated for a range of ∆. We have which indicates that the stable regime is a steady state chosen the Poincar´esection defined by the equationw ˙ 1+ (fixed point). Above HB, the “period-one” stable oscil- w˙ 2 = 0 as it produces a diagram convenient for interpre- lations appear in the system, which are represented in tation. Thus, for a given ∆, a single point in the bifurca- Suppl. Fig. 2a by a single point for each value of ∆. tion diagram represents either a fixed point or periodic An example of such oscillations for ∆ = 1 .5 is shown in oscillations of w1. Similarly, several separated points cor- Suppl. Fig. 3a. The left panel shows the time-domain 4 Power Power realization of w1, while the right panel depicts the pro- Power Power a b c d jection of the phase trajectories of the oscillations on the 1 1 1 1 (w2, w 1) plane. The phase trajectories correspond to a limit cycle, seen as a single-loop closed curve. Period- 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 doubling bifurcation PD destabilises period-one oscilla- 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.4 f 0 0.4 0 0.4 f 0 0.4 f tions and gives birth to stable period-two oscillations, f an example of which is shown in Suppl. Fig. 3b for ∆ = 1 .939. The time-domain realization of this regime SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 4: Power-frequency ( f) spec- trum of w1(t) calculated for the dynamics of qubit chains (left panel) shows two maxima per period, which in consisting of 4 a , 8 b , 10 c , 20 d qubits for Ω = 2 .5, c = 5, phase space implies a two-loop limit cycle (right panel). ∆ = 5 .0. In Suppl. Fig. 2b the period-two limit cycle is repre- sented by two points for each given ∆. After the sec- C ond period-doubling bifurcation, the period-two oscilla- 0.8 tions lose their stability producing period-four oscilla- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 0.6 tions. These oscillations are represented in Suppl. Fig. 2a by four points for a given ∆. The oscillations have four 0.4 maxima per period [Suppl. Fig. 3c] and their phase tra- 0.2 jectory forms a four-loop limit cycle. All periodic regimes 0 are characterized by one zero Lyapunov exponent, whilst 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 n all other Lyapunov exponent are negative [see Suppl. Fig. 2b]. SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 5: Correlation coefficient, C, The evolution of period-added limit cycles with the of the first qubit in the chain calculated versus the index, n, of the other qubit for chains with N = 10 (line 1), 12 (line 2), variation of ∆ leads to the appearance of deterministic 20 (line 3), 30 (line 4) and 40 (line 5), and for Ω = 2 .5, c = 5, chaos, whose areas of existence are cross-hatched in Figs. ∆ = 5 .0. 2a,b. In Suppl. Fig. 2a the chaos is mapped as a complex set of points. A typical chaotic time evolution is shown in the left panel of Suppl. Fig. 3d. Although the oscilla- a multi-band chaotic attractor, look more regular than tions superficially demonstrate a certain order, they are the dynamics in Suppl. Fig. 3e, where the chaotic at- irregular, unstable, do not have any distinct period, and tractor demonstrates a single band with very irregular their phase trajectories never close; although from time orbits. to time they return to the same area of the phase space [right panel of Fig 3d]. These oscillations are character- ized by one positive and one zero Lyapunov exponent, C. Spectra of hyperchaotic oscillations with all other Lyapunov exponents being negative. This sequence of Lyapunov exponents evidences the chaotic Figure 4 presents the power spectrum for chaotic and character of the oscillations [7]. One can see that the hyperchaotic oscillations, which emerge in the ring chains chaos region in Suppl. Fig. 2a is interspersed with “win- of qubits with varying N for fixed Ω = 2 .5, c = 5 and dows of periodicity”, where the chaos is replaced by com- ∆ = 5 .0. For N = 4 (a) the system demonstrates chaotic plex periodic solutions. In Suppl. Fig. 2b these windows oscillations, which are characterized by one positive Lya- are reflected by Λ 1 falling back to zero. The emergence punov exponent. The chaotic oscillations demonstrate of these windows of periodicity is typical for chaos born a broadband continuous spectrum with a distinct peak through a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations [7]. near the frequency f = 0 .8 corresponding to the char- The range of ∆ corresponding to bistability in the sys- acteristic time scale of the oscillations. For N = 8 tem is shown in Suppl. Fig. 2a as the cross-hatched area [Suppl. Fig. 4b], the oscillations existing for the parame- limited by a pair of SN points. Within this range, the ters above become hyperchaotic with three positive Lya- homogeneous fixed point (the lower branch of the bifurca- punov exponents. In the Fourier spectrum, the position tion diagram) coexists with different inhomogeneous so- of the characteristic peak shifts towards lower frequency lutions (the upper branch of the diagram). It is notewor- f ≈ 0.11, which reflects the change of the character of thy that, depending on the value of ∆, the latter solution the chaotic behavior. In addition, the peak itself becomes can be either another fixed point or periodic oscillations, less pronounced as its height considerably decreases com- or even chaos. An example of the coexistence of a ho- pared to the background. As N further increases (c), the mogeneous fixed point and chaos is shown in Suppl. Fig. distinctive characteristic peaked power spectrum disap- 3e. The chaos in this example is weaker than that in pears, and for N > 12 (d) the spectrum of hyperchaos Suppl. Fig. 3d because Λ 1 is smaller in the former. This varies smoothly with f, demonstrating a shape that is is also reflected in the behavior of the oscillations. For in- typical of random noise in solids, e.g. hot-electron noise stance, the phase trajectories in Suppl. Fig. 3d, forming in semiconductors [8]. 5 To shed light on the dependence of the number of the a 0.4 positive Lyapunov exponents, M, versus N, presented 0.2 in Suppl. Fig. 5, we calculated the linear correlation 0 coefficients cm,n , characterizing the correlations between 1,2,3,4 -0.2 L the oscillations of the mth and nth qubits in the chain -0.4 -0.6 h(w (t) − h w i)( w (t) − h w i)i b c = m m n n , (5) 0.2 m,n 2 2 h(wm(t) − h wmi) i h (wn(t) − h wni) i 0 p 1,2,3,4 -0.2 L where h.i is the time average, and m, n = 1 , . . . , N . The -0.4 n dependence of the coefficient C = c1 calculated for ,n -0.6 different N is shown in Suppl. Fig. 5. Each curve is sym- c 0.4 metric with maxima C = 1 for n = 1 and n = N + 1 0.2 reflecting the fact that we consider ring chains, where 0 the first and ( N + 1)th qubits coincide. For all N, the 1,2,3,4 -0.2 L correlation C drops to almost zero for n = 6. Thus, the -0.4 oscillation of the first qubit is practically unaffected by -0.6 the dynamics of the 6th one. Due to this drop of corre- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 D lation in chains with N > 6, the inclusion of a chaotic oscillator into the chain simply adds a new positive Lya- SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 6: Variation of the four largest punov exponent to the spectrum. Previously, we have Lyapunov exponents with ∆ calculated for a five non-identical shown that chaotic dynamics can emerge as a coopera- qubits in a ring chain with the parameters given in Supple- mentary Table I; b ten non-identical qubits in non-ring chain; tive phenomenon when at least two qubits interact with c ten non-identical qubits, each connected to two nearest each other. Such interactions could provide a qualitative neighbors on each side. The parameters for b and c are sum- explanation for the almost linear dependence of M on N marized in Supplementary Table II; for all graphs Ω = 2 .5, shown in Suppl. Fig. 5, where the inclusion of every 2-3 c = 5. extra qubits into the chain with N > 6 produces an ad- ditional positive Lyapunov exponent for the given values i δΩi δ∆i δc i of the parameters. 1 −0.2 +0.45 −0.1 2 −0.15 0 +0.45 3 +0.05 −0.4 0 4 0 −0.05 +0.4 D. Non-identical qubits 5 +0.2 +0.25 −0.35 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE I: Parameters of the five indi- We examined the existence of chaos and hyperchaos in vidual qubits used to calculate the graphs in Suppl. Fig. 6a, chains of non-identical qubits with nearest neighbor in- where index i labels the qubit position in the chain. teractions, both in ring formation and open chains, and also in a ring chain where each qubit connects with two neighbors on each side. The parameters of each qubit were detuned with a random mismatch of up to 10% of E. Entangled qubits. their average values: ∆ i =∆+ δ∆i, Ω i =Ω+ δΩi, and ci = c+δc i. Figure 6 presents the variation of the four largest To obtain insights into the role of entanglement on Lyapunov exponents with ∆ for (a) five non-identical the dynamics of a qubit chain, we numerically integrate qubits in the ring chain, (b) ten non-identical qubits in the von Neumann equation (Eq.(2) in the main text) an open chain, and (c) ten non-identical qubits in a ring for the N-particle density matrix, without any simpli- chain, where each qubit interacts with two neighbors on fying assumptions. To illustrate the results, we con- each side. All graphs are plotted for Ω = 2 .5 and c = 5. sider a chain of N = 5 qubits with nearest-neighbor in- The parameters’ mismatch for the graphs in Suppl. Fig. teraction and calculate the average Rydberg population 6a (Suppl. Fig. 6 b,c) are summarized in Suppl. Tab. I hEi (t) = j Tr |eih e|j /N , where Tr denotes the trace of (II) respectively. the density matrix. Supplementary Figure 7 shows the The graphs in Suppl. Fig. 6 reveal the areas of ∆ that typical timeP dependence of hEi (t) calculated for fixed correspond to one or few positive Lyapunov exponents, values of ∆ = 2.5, V = 5, γ = 0 .01 and various Ω. i.e. areas of existence of chaos and hyperchaos, in all For small Ω = 0 .3, the expectation value hEi demon- types of the chains considered. The latter confirms the strates coherent, almost harmonic, oscillations (a). As generic character of chaos and hyperchaos phenomena in Ω grows, the system transitions through quasiperiodic various chains of coherent quantum systems. (b), noise-like (c), and, finally, re-entrant quasiperiodic 6 i δΩi δ∆i δc i sity Press, 2011). 1 −0.25 +0.45 −0.4 [2] Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-x. & Nori, 2 +0.1 0 +0.15 F. Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum 3 −0.15 −0.3 0 circuits. Physics Reports 718 , 1–102 (2017). 4 0 −0.1 +0.4 [3] Lee, T. E., H¨affner, H. & Cross, M. Antiferromagnetic 5 +0.2 +0.25 −0.2 phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of Rydberg 6 −0.35 +0.35 −0.5 atoms. Physical Review A 84 , 031402 (2011). 7 +0.05 −0.2 +0.25 [4] Lee, T. E., Haeffner, H. & Cross, M. Collective quantum 8 −0.05 −0.35 +0.1 jumps of Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Letters 108 , 9 +0.15 +0.05 +0.45 023602 (2012). 10 +0.25 +0.5 −0.25 [5] Oseledets, V. I. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Charac- teristic Ljapunov exponents of dynamical systems. Trans. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE II: Parameters of the ten indi- Moscow Math. Soc. 19 , 197–231 (1968). vidual qubits used to calculate the graphs in Suppl. Fig. 6b,c, [6] Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. De- where index i labels the qubit position in the chain. termining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 16 , 285–317 (1985). [7] Anishchenko, V. S. Dynamical Chaos, Models and Ex- periments: Appearance Routes and Structure of Chaos in decaying oscillations (d). A detailed analysis of this re- Simple Dynamical Systems (World Scientific Publishing, sult, as well as investigation of the transition from the Singapore, 1995). fully entangled to the factorized case in the presence of [8] Kogan, S. Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids (Cambridge University Press, 2008). entanglement-disrupting processes, will be presented in a separate paper. [1] Zagoskin, A. M. Quantum engineering: theory and de- sign of quantum coherent structures (Cambridge Univer- 7 a b c d SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 7: Time evolution of hEi cal- culated for ∆ = 2.5, V = 5, γ = 0 .01 and a Ω = 0 .3, b Ω = 1 .3, c Ω = 3 .3 and d Ω = 5 .7.