DOCSLIB.ORG

Birkbeck, University of London Italian Futurism and the Development Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Birkbeck, University of London Italian Futurism and the Development Of Birkbeck, University of London Italian Futurism and the Development of English Literary Modernism, 1909–1915 Robyn Sarah Jakeman Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Declaration I, Robyn Jakeman, declare that this thesis is my own work. Where I have drawn upon the work of other researchers, this has been fully acknowledged. 2 Abstract This thesis considers the role of Italian Futurism in the development of English literary modernism between 1909 and 1915. It maps a set of complex and heterogeneous responses to the movement, involving both rejection and appropriation, in which attempts to experiment with English literature are undertaken in a bid to become ‘modern’. I argue that Futurism represented for many English modernists a profoundly relevant approach to a social and cultural crisis that had emerged in the late nineteenth century. In this sense, Futurism was less a movement to be officially joined than a methodology that was appropriated in order to subvert and develop fin- de-siècle cultural discourses. The thesis is divided into four chapters. Chapter one addresses Futurism’s inception in the internationalised space of cultural production of Europe before the First World War, and the movement’s emergence in England. It suggests that Futurism was frequently understood as a means of transforming social discourses of decline, cultural discourses of Decadence, and the relationship between art and the public. The second chapter explores Harold Monro’s interactions with F. T. Marinetti and his publication of Futurist poetry in Poetry and Drama, and considers how Monro transmitted Futurism to an English readership to suggest ways of developing Decadent and Symbolist poetry. Chapter three examines Wyndham Lewis’s use of Futurist strategies in Vorticism to negotiate the Aestheticist divide between art and life, but also shows how tensions between the two movements continue to manifest in Blast. The fourth chapter considers Mina Loy’s writings in the context of Futurist discourses and New Woman debates in Florence, demonstrating how she appropriated Futurist methods to inform her feminist thought and disrupt the basis on which 3 gendered difference is predicated. I conclude the thesis by considering the implications of my work for the field of modernist studies. 4 Acknowledgements I would not have been able to write this thesis without the support of a number of colleagues, friends, and family members. I am eternally grateful to my PhD supervisors Joanne Winning and Ana Parejo Vadillo, whose encouragement and positive feedback has motivated me to complete this thesis. Their critical insight has developed my thinking and enriched my work enormously over the last few years, and I cannot imagine having better or more inspiring mentors. Special thanks are due to the Hanbury Charity, which provided me with a generous grant to buy a new laptop at the beginning of this degree. Flore Janssen and Sasha Dovzhyk gave up their time to read various chapter drafts over the course of my PhD, and I am indebted to them for their perceptive comments and suggestions. David Gillott gave me invaluable advice on referencing. Charlotte Logan-Jones kindly checked my French translations. Kashif Nazir has been a dependable and supportive partner throughout the high and low points of this work, and I cannot thank him enough for the extraordinary patience he has shown while I have had to work long and late hours at the library. Above all, I would like to thank my parents, Robert Jakeman and Pauline Jakeman, and my grandfather Raymond Jakeman, for their unwavering and unconditional support throughout the process of my PhD studies. Without their kindness and generosity I would certainly never have been able to start, and still less complete this work, and so it is to them that I dedicate this thesis. 5 Table of Contents List of Illustrations 8 Introduction 9 Chapter One: An Imagined Community: Transnational Futurism and Futurism in England, 1909–1914 41 Conceiving Space: Futurism’s Nationalist and Cosmopolitan Tendencies 45 Futurism and European Fields of Cultural Production 59 Establishing Futurism in England 69 Conclusion 90 Chapter Two: ‘The Beautiful Future’: Harold Monro, Poetry and Drama, and Futurism 92 Harold Monro and F. T. Marinetti’s Futurism 97 Futurist Poetry in Poetry and Drama: Between Symbolism and Futurism 112 Monro’s Futurism 124 Afterlives of Futurism 136 Conclusion 141 Chapter Three: ‘A Futurism of Place’: Wyndham Lewis’s Vorticism between Aestheticism and Futurism 144 Vorticism in the Field of Cultural Production 149 Lewis and Aestheticism 157 Lewis and Futurism 174 ‘Futurism, Magic and Life’ 185 Conclusion 196 6 Chapter Four: Mina Loy’s Futurist Methodology: Degendering the Modern Woman 200 Loy and New Woman Discourses in Florence 205 Futurism and ‘Woman’ 219 Loy’s Futurist Methodology 236 Towards a Materialist Feminism 253 Conclusion 257 Conclusion 261 Bibliography 270 7 List of Illustrations Figure 1. E. X. Kapp, ‘Impression of Wyndham Lewis’, The New Weekly, vol. 1, no. 11 (30 May 1914), p. 331. 169 Figure 2. X. Marcel Boulestin, ‘Post Georgian’, The Blue Review, vol. 1, no 3 (July 1913), n. p. [‘Frontispiece’]. 171 8 Introduction Erupting on to the European cultural scene on the front page of the Parisian daily newspaper Le Figaro on 20 February 1909, Futurism announced a new literary and artistic programme that celebrated modernity in all its guises.1 The ‘Founding and Manifesto of Futurism’, devised and disseminated by the movement’s founder and impresario F. T. Marinetti (1876–1944), narrated the story of its author’s car crash and metaphorical rebirth, followed by a catalogue of hyperbolic statements intended to demonstrate Futurism’s commitment to the innovative and rebellious but also destructive powers of modernity. It claimed to address itself not to the intellectual elite, but to the modern phenomenon of the crowd — the ‘great masses shaken with work, pleasure, or rebellion’ — and demanded the demolition of ‘museums, libraries, [and] academies’: institutions that encouraged the worship of the past rather than stimulating a love for the future.2 Most controversially, the movement called for the glorification and aesthetic appreciation of war as the ‘only hygiene of the world’, as well as ‘militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of anarchists, beautiful ideas that kill, and contempt for woman’.3 While it is perhaps something of a commonplace to begin a study of Futurism with a brief summary of its founding gesture, no other document has encapsulated so successfully the aims and objectives, as well as the inherent tensions and contradictions of the movement. Futurism was presented as a fundamental break with the past, existing in an atemporal sphere, yet the first manifesto is filled with references to the past and present. It claimed to address the 1 F. T. Marinetti, ‘Le Futurisme’, Le Figaro, 20 February 1909, p. 1. 2 F. T. Marinetti, ‘The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism’ [1909], in Futurism: An Anthology, ed. by Lawrence Rainey, Christine Poggi, and Laura Wittman (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), pp. 49–53 (p. 51). 3 Ibid. 9 masses but was publicised in a famously literary newspaper. And, perhaps most significantly, while the manifesto’s emphasis is placed on a specifically Italian national renewal, it speaks to — or rather, shouts at — an international cultural community. The international manifestations of Futurism, specifically its manifestations in English literature, are the focus of this thesis. Although much attention has been devoted to this subject, the movement has essentially been portrayed in modernist criticism as an unwelcome invasion, a movement that had no influence, or was, quite simply, ineffective. For Paul Peppis, Futurism’s ‘effect on [English] literature remained virtually non-existent, and when it did have an effect on actual writing it did so only in the wake of its unquestionable influence in forming a visual avant-garde in England’, and while Cubo-Futurism was strongly evident in painting, there ‘was no equivalent assimilation of Futurism in writing’.4 If Futurism is studied in relation to literary modernism then it is largely considered in terms of its fascination with modernity, its identification with the machine, and its obsession with speed. It also tends to focus predominantly on the ultra-male strands of modernism — the ‘men of 1914’ as Wyndham Lewis (1882–1957) later referred to himself, Ezra Pound (1885– 1972), T. S. Eliot (1888–1965), and James Joyce (1882–1941).5 As a result, English responses have often been understood to be unambiguously hostile to Futurism: Lawrence Rainey, for example, refers to Imagism as the ‘first anti-avant-garde’, while Martin Puchner brands Lewis and Vorticism as the ‘rear-garde’, adopting a ‘defensive’ stance within a nascent avant-garde culture.6 4 Paul Peppis, ‘Futurism, Literature, and the Market’, in The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature, ed. by Laura Marcus and Peter Nicholls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 132–51 (p. 142). 5 Wyndham Lewis, Blasting and Bombardiering [1937] (London: Caldar and Boyars, 1967), p. 252. 6 Lawrence Rainey, Institutions of Modernism: Literary Elites and Public Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), p. 30; Martin Puchner, ‘The Aftershocks of Blast: Manifestos, Satire, and the 10 A focus on Futurism’s fetishisation of technological modernity and the aesthetics of speed, which is perhaps to say the more superficial aspects of the movement’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Anniversary Acquisitions
    Checklist of Anniversary Acquisitions As of August 1, 2002 Note to the Reader The works of art illustrated in color in the preceding pages represent a selection of the objects in the exhibition Gifts in Honor of the 125th Anniversary of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. The Checklist that follows includes all of the Museum’s anniversary acquisitions, not just those in the exhibition. The Checklist has been organized by geography (Africa, Asia, Europe, North America) and within each continent by broad category (Costume and Textiles; Decorative Arts; Paintings; Prints, Drawings, and Photographs; Sculpture). Within each category, works of art are listed chronologically. An asterisk indicates that an object is illustrated in black and white in the Checklist. Page references are to color plates. For gifts of a collection numbering more than forty objects, an overview of the contents of the collection is provided in lieu of information about each individual object. Certain gifts have been the subject of separate exhibitions with their own catalogues. In such instances, the reader is referred to the section For Further Reading. Africa | Sculpture AFRICA ASIA Floral, Leaf, Crane, and Turtle Roundels Vests (2) Colonel Stephen McCormick’s continued generosity to Plain-weave cotton with tsutsugaki (rice-paste Plain-weave cotton with cotton sashiko (darning the Museum in the form of the gift of an impressive 1 Sculpture Costume and Textiles resist), 57 x 54 inches (120.7 x 115.6 cm) stitches) (2000-113-17), 30 ⁄4 x 24 inches (77.5 x group of forty-one Korean and Chinese objects is espe- 2000-113-9 61 cm); plain-weave shifu (cotton warp and paper cially remarkable for the variety and depth it offers as a 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Futurism, 1909–1944: Reconstructing the Universe Published on Iitaly.Org (
    Italian Futurism, 1909–1944: Reconstructing the Universe Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) Italian Futurism, 1909–1944: Reconstructing the Universe Natasha Lardera (February 21, 2014) On view at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, until September 1st, 2014, this thorough exploration of the Futurist movement, a major modernist expression that in many ways remains little known among American audiences, promises to show audiences a little known branch of Italian art. Giovanni Acquaviva, Guillaume Apollinaire, Fedele Azari, Francesco Balilla Pratella, Giacomo Balla, Barbara (Olga Biglieri), Benedetta (Benedetta Cappa Marinetti), Mario Bellusi, Ottavio Berard, Romeo Bevilacqua, Piero Boccardi, Umberto Boccioni, Enrico Bona, Aroldo Bonzagni, Anton Giulio Bragaglia, Arturo Bragaglia, Alessandro Bruschetti, Paolo Buzzi, Mauro Camuzzi, Francesco Cangiullo, Pasqualino Cangiullo, Mario Carli, Carlo Carra, Mario Castagneri, Giannina Censi, Cesare Cerati, Mario Chiattone, Gilbert Clavel, Bruno Corra (Bruno Ginanni Corradini), Tullio Crali, Tullio d’Albisola (Tullio Mazzotti), Ferruccio Demanins, Fortunato Depero, Nicolaj Diulgheroff, Gerardo Dottori, Fillia (Luigi Page 1 of 3 Italian Futurism, 1909–1944: Reconstructing the Universe Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) Colombo), Luciano Folgore (Omero Vecchi), Corrado Govoni, Virgilio Marchi, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, Alberto Martini, Pino Masnata, Filippo Masoero, Angiolo Mazzoni, Torido Mazzotti, Alberto Montacchini, Nelson Morpurgo, Bruno Munari, N. Nicciani, Vinicio Paladini
    [Show full text]
  • Aeropittura (Aeropainting) Watercolour, with Touches of Silver Pen, with Framing Lines in Green Ink, on Paper Laid Down Onto a Black Card (The Cover of a Notebook?)
    Domenico (Mino) DELLE SITE (Lecce 1914 - Rome 1996) Aeropittura (Aeropainting) Watercolour, with touches of silver pen, with framing lines in green ink, on paper laid down onto a black card (the cover of a notebook?). Signed with monogram, inscribed and dated DSte FUTURISTA / 1932/ LF/ X in white gouache on the backing card, below the image. Titled AERO/ PITTURA on a separate sheet of paper cut out and pasted onto the lower right of the image. Further inscribed Delle Site Domenico / Alunno 4oCorso on the backing card. 93 x 103 mm. (3 5/8 x 4 1/8 in.) [image, at greatest dimensions]. 241 x 175 mm. (9 1/2 x 67/8 in.) [backing card] In September 1929 the Futurist theorist and founder Filippo Tomasso Marinetti published an article entitled ‘Perspectives of Flight and Aeropainting’ in the Gazzetta del Popolo in Turin, signed by Giacomo Balla, Fortunato Depero, Enrico Prampolini and several other Futurist painters. Republished in a revised and more complete version in 1931, the text served as a manifesto of the nascent branch of Futurism known as aeropittura, or Futurist aeropainting: ‘We Futurists declare that: 1. The changing perspectives of flight are an absolutely new reality that has nothing to do with the traditional reality of terrestrial perspectives. 2. The elements of this new reality have no fixed point and are built out of the same perennial mobility. 3. The painter cannot observe and paint unless he experiences the same speed as these elements. 4. Painting this new reality from the air imposes a profound contempt for detail and a need to summarize and transfigure everything…7.
    [Show full text]
  • Futurism's Photography
    Futurism’s Photography: From fotodinamismo to fotomontaggio Sarah Carey University of California, Los Angeles The critical discourse on photography and Italian Futurism has proven to be very limited in its scope. Giovanni Lista, one of the few critics to adequately analyze the topic, has produced several works of note: Futurismo e fotografia (1979), I futuristi e la fotografia (1985), Cinema e foto- grafia futurista (2001), Futurism & Photography (2001), and most recently Il futurismo nella fotografia (2009).1 What is striking about these titles, however, is that only one actually refers to “Futurist photography” — or “fotografia futurista.” In fact, given the other (though few) scholarly studies of Futurism and photography, there seems to have been some hesitancy to qualify it as such (with some exceptions).2 So, why has there been this sense of distacco? And why only now might we only really be able to conceive of it as its own genre? This unusual trend in scholarly discourse, it seems, mimics closely Futurism’s own rocky relationship with photography, which ranged from an initial outright distrust to a later, rather cautious acceptance that only came about on account of one critical stipulation: that Futurist photography was neither an art nor a formal and autonomous aesthetic category — it was, instead, an ideological weapon. The Futurists were only able to utilize photography towards this end, and only with the further qualification that only certain photographic forms would be acceptable for this purpose: the portrait and photo-montage. It is, in fact, the very legacy of Futurism’s appropriation of these sub-genres that allows us to begin to think critically about Futurist photography per se.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism 1 Modernism
    Modernism 1 Modernism Modernism, in its broadest definition, is modern thought, character, or practice. More specifically, the term describes the modernist movement, its set of cultural tendencies and array of associated cultural movements, originally arising from wide-scale and far-reaching changes to Western society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Modernism was a revolt against the conservative values of realism.[2] [3] [4] Arguably the most paradigmatic motive of modernism is the rejection of tradition and its reprise, incorporation, rewriting, recapitulation, revision and parody in new forms.[5] [6] [7] Modernism rejected the lingering certainty of Enlightenment thinking and also rejected the existence of a compassionate, all-powerful Creator God.[8] [9] In general, the term modernism encompasses the activities and output of those who felt the "traditional" forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life were becoming outdated in the new economic, social, and political conditions of an Hans Hofmann, "The Gate", 1959–1960, emerging fully industrialized world. The poet Ezra Pound's 1934 collection: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. injunction to "Make it new!" was paradigmatic of the movement's Hofmann was renowned not only as an artist but approach towards the obsolete. Another paradigmatic exhortation was also as a teacher of art, and a modernist theorist articulated by philosopher and composer Theodor Adorno, who, in the both in his native Germany and later in the U.S. During the 1930s in New York and California he 1940s, challenged conventional surface coherence and appearance of introduced modernism and modernist theories to [10] harmony typical of the rationality of Enlightenment thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturelk the DECADENTS
    Literaturelk Around the World THE DECADENTS France. At the end of the 19th century a group of French poets, including Rimbaud, Verlaine and Mallarmé, formed a movement and called themselveb 'Les Décadents'. They aspired to set literature and art free from the materialistic preoccupations of industrialised society.They saw art as the highest expression of the human spirit, stating that art and life are strictly linked. These poets rejected the traditional values of society choosing instead an immoral and irregular lifestyle, free of any conventions or rules. England. Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), the decadent, anti-conformist and dandy, who introduced himself to America with the famous phrase 'I have nothing to declare except my genius', is often linked to his French predecessors, however, he did not isolate V Gabriele D'Annunzio himself from the world, but instead craved popularity and fame. The epitome of the reading in his dandy is the protagonist of his novel The Picture of Dorían Gray (even if he is represented `Vittoriale degli italiani', the negatively). monumental citadel created by Italy. 'Decadentismo' is an Italian artistic movement influenced by the French and the Italian writer between 1921 and British Decadent Movement.Although differing in their approaches, like the other two 1938 in Gardone movements, it championed the irrational and the idiosyncratic against the advancing Riviera, on the tide of scientific rationalism and mass culture at the turn of the 20th century. Brescian Riverside of Lake Garda. Gabriele D'Annunzio (1863-1938) is generally considered the main representative of the Italian Decadentismo. He played a prominent role in Italian literature from 1889 to 1910 and after that in political life from 1914 to 1924.
    [Show full text]
  • Caffeina E Vodka Italia E Russia: Futurismi a Confronto Claudia Salaris
    Caffeina e vodka Italia e Russia: futurismi a confronto Claudia Salaris Il viaggio di Marinetti in Russia Negli anni eroici del futurismo il fondatore Filippo Tommaso Marinetti era noto con il soprannome di “Caffeina d’Europa” per l’energia con cui diffondeva la religione del futuro da un paese all’altro. Uno dei suoi viaggi memorabili è quello in Russia all’inizio del 1914 1. Invitato a tenere un ciclo di conferenze a Mosca e a Pietroburgo, Il poeta ha accettato con entusiasmo, pensando a un patto d’unità d’azione con i fratelli orientali. Infatti nella terra degli zar il futurismo è nato con caratteristiche proprie,ma è sempre un parente stretto del movimento marinettiano. Nelle realizzazioni dell’avanguardia russa non sono pochi gli echi delle teorie e invenzioni del futurismo marinettiano. Ma, al contrario degli italiani che formano una specie di partito d’artisti omogeneo, i russi sono sparsi in diversi gruppi. Nel 1910 è uscita a Pietroburgo l’antologia Il vivaio dei giudici , a cui hanno collaborato, tra gli altri, i fratelli David e Nikolaj Burljuk, Elena Guro, Vasilij Kamenskij, Viktor Chlebnikov. A costoro presto si sono uniti Vladimir Majakovskij, Benedikt Livshich, Alexandr Kruchënych e alla fine del 1912 il gruppo, che intanto ha assunto il nome di Gileja, pubblica il volume Schiaffo al gusto corrente , che nel titolo rivela la matrice marinettiana, ricalcando il “disprezzo del pubblico” promulgato dal poeta italiano. Il libro collettivo contiene un editoriale-manifesto in cui i gilejani, rifiutando il passato e le accademie, esortano i giovani a “gettare Pushkin, Dostoevskij, Tolstoj, ecc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. the Avant-Garde in the Late 20Th Century 1
    Chapter 12. The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century 1 The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century: Modernism becomes Postmodernism A college student walks across campus in 1960. She has just left her room in the sorority house and is on her way to the art building. She is dressed for class, in carefully coordinated clothes that were all purchased from the same company: a crisp white shirt embroidered with her initials, a cardigan sweater in Kelly green wool, and a pleated skirt, also Kelly green, that reaches right to her knees. On her feet, she wears brown loafers and white socks. She carries a neatly packed bag, filled with freshly washed clothes: pants and a big work shirt for her painting class this morning; and shorts, a T-shirt and tennis shoes for her gym class later in the day. She’s walking rather rapidly, because she’s dying for a cigarette and knows that proper sorority girls don’t ever smoke unless they have a roof over their heads. She can’t wait to get into her painting class and light up. Following all the rules of the sorority is sometimes a drag, but it’s a lot better than living in the dormitory, where girls have ten o’clock curfews on weekdays and have to be in by midnight on weekends. (Of course, the guys don’t have curfews, but that’s just the way it is.) Anyway, it’s well known that most of the girls in her sorority marry well, and she can’t imagine anything she’d rather do after college.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Between the Lines 2017
    the LINES Vanderbilt University, 2016–17 RESEARCH and from the LEARNING UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN Places and Spaces International exhibit unites students, faculty and staff in celebrating mapping technology Dear colleagues and friends, ast spring, the Vanderbilt Heard Libraries hosted Places & Spaces: Mapping Science, It is my pleasure to share with you Between the Lines, a publication of an international exhibition the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries. In words, numbers and images, celebrating the use of data we offer a glimpse into the many ways our libraries support and enhance Lvisualizations to make sense of large MAPPING SCIENCE teaching, learning and research at Vanderbilt. Between the Lines will data streams in groundbreaking ways. introduce you to the remarkable things happening in the libraries and The campuswide exhibit proved to be perhaps even challenge your perception of the roles of libraries and intellectually enriching and socially unifying, according to campus leaders. librarians. We are grateful to the many donors and friends who made “The Places & Spaces: Mapping Science much of this work possible. exhibit brought together students, faculty and staff to celebrate technological The past academic year has been one of change for Vanderbilt’s Heard advances in data visualization that Libraries with new faces, new library services, new spaces and new facilitate our understanding of the world I programs. It has also been a year of continuity as we build collections, around us,” says Cynthia J. Cyrus, vice make resources accessible and provide contemplative and collaborative provost for learning and residential affairs. “From the disciplines of science and Ptolemy’s Cosmo- spaces for research and study.
    [Show full text]
  • The T Ransrational Poetry of Russian Futurism Gerald J Ara,Tek
    The T ransrational Poetry of Russian Futurism E Gerald J ara,tek ' 1996 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSilY PRESS Calexico Mexicali Tijuana San Diego Copyright © 1996 by San Diego State University Press First published in 1996 by San Diego State University Press, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182-8141 http:/fwww-rohan.sdsu.edu/ dept/ press/ All rights reserved. -', Except for brief passages quoted in a review, no part of thisb ook m b ay e reproduced in an form, by photostat, microfilm, xerography r y , o any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, withoutthe written permission of thecop yright owners. Set in Book Antiqua Design by Harry Polkinhorn, Bill Nericcio and Lorenzo Antonio Nericcio ISBN 1-879691-41-8 Thanks to Christine Taylor for editorial production assistance 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Acknowledgements Research for this book was supported in large part by grants in 1983, 1986, and 1989 from the International Research & Ex­ changes Board (IREX), with funds provided by the National En­ dowment for the Humanities, the United States Information Agency, and the US Department of State, which administers the Russian, Eurasian, and East European Research Program (Title VIII). In addition, I would like to express my gratitude to the fol­ lowing institutions and their staffs for aid essential in complet­ ing this project: the Fulbright-Bayes Senior Scholar Research Program for further support for the trips in 1983 and 1989, the American Council of Learned Societies for further support for the trip in 1986, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Brit­ ish Library; iri Moscow: to the Russian State Library, the Rus­ sian State Archive of Literature and Art, the Gorky Institute of World Literature, the State Literary Museum, and the Mayakovsky Museum; in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Genius Is Nothing but an Extravagant Manifestation of the Body. — Arthur Cravan, 1914
    1 ........................................... The Baroness and Neurasthenic Art History Genius is nothing but an extravagant manifestation of the body. — Arthur Cravan, 1914 Some people think the women are the cause of [artistic] modernism, whatever that is. — New York Evening Sun, 1917 I hear “New York” has gone mad about “Dada,” and that the most exotic and worthless review is being concocted by Man Ray and Duchamp. What next! This is worse than The Baroness. By the way I like the way the discovery has suddenly been made that she has all along been, unconsciously, a Dadaist. I cannot figure out just what Dadaism is beyond an insane jumble of the four winds, the six senses, and plum pudding. But if the Baroness is to be a keystone for it,—then I think I can possibly know when it is coming and avoid it. — Hart Crane, c. 1920 Paris has had Dada for five years, and we have had Else von Freytag-Loringhoven for quite two years. But great minds think alike and great natural truths force themselves into cognition at vastly separated spots. In Else von Freytag-Loringhoven Paris is mystically united [with] New York. — John Rodker, 1920 My mind is one rebellion. Permit me, oh permit me to rebel! — Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, c. 19251 In a 1921 letter from Man Ray, New York artist, to Tristan Tzara, the Romanian poet who had spearheaded the spread of Dada to Paris, the “shit” of Dada being sent across the sea (“merdelamerdelamerdela . .”) is illustrated by the naked body of German expatriate the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven (see fig.
    [Show full text]
  • John Quinn, Art Advocate
    John Quinn, Art Advocate Introduction Today I’m going to talk briefly about John Quinn (fig. 1), a New York lawyer who, in his spare time and with income derived from a highly-successful law practice, became “the twentieth century’s most important patron of living literature and art.”1 Nicknamed “The Noble Buyer” for his solicitude for artists as much as for the depth of his pocketbook, Quinn would amass an unsurpassed collection of nineteenth- and twentieth-century American and European art. At its zenith, the collection con- tained more than 2,500 works of art, including works by Con- stantin Brancusi, Paul Cézanne, André Derain, Marcel Du- champ, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, Paul Gaugin, Juan Gris, Henri Matisse, Pablo Picasso, Georges Rouault, Henri Rousseau, Georges Seurat, and Vincent van Gogh.2 More than a collector, Quinn represented artists and art associa- tions in all types of legal matters. The most far-reaching of these en- gagements was Quinn’s successful fight for repeal of a tariff on im- 1 ALINE B. SAARINEN, THE PROUD POSSESSORS: THE LIVES, TIMES AND TASTES OF SOME ADVENTUROUS AMERICAN ART COLLECTORS 206 (1958) [hereinafter PROUD POSSESSORS]. 2 Avis Berman, “Creating a New Epoch”: American Collectors and Dealers and the Armory Show [hereinafter American Collectors], in THE ARMORY SHOW AT 100: MODERNISM AND REVOLUTION 413, 415 (Marilyn Satin Kushner & Kimberly Orcutt eds., 2013) [hereinafter KUSHNER & ORCUTT, ARMORY SHOW] (footnote omitted). ported contemporary art3 – an accomplishment that resulted in him being elected an Honorary Fellow for Life by the Metropolitan Mu- seum of Art.4 This work, like much Quinn did for the arts, was un- dertaken pro bono.5 Quinn was also instrumental in organizing two groundbreaking art exhibitions: the May 1921 Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition of “Impressionist and Post-Impressionist Paintings” (that museum’s first exhibition of modern art),6 and the landmark 1913 “International Exhibition of Modern Art”7 – otherwise known as the Armory Show.
    [Show full text]