DOCSLIB.ORG

Running Head: COMPONENTS of DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Running Head: COMPONENTS of DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS Running Head: COMPONENTS OF DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS Components of Docent Training Programs in Nationally Accredited Museums in the United States and Their Correspondence to the Adult Learning Model for Faculty Development Kerry S. Teeple A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Findlay’s College of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION March 2019 Committee: Allison Baer, Ph.D. Chair, Dissertation Committee Mary Heather Munger, Ph.D. Committee Member Amanda Ochsner, Ph.D. Committee Member John C. Gillham, Ed.D Chair, Doctorate of Education Program Julie McIntosh, Ed.D Dean, College of Education COMPONENTS OF DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS © 2019 Kerry S. Teeple All Rights Reserved COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS iii ABSTRACT Empirical evidence of docent training practices in nationally accredited museums in the United States is limited. Much information can be found in the literature on recommended educational theories that can serve as a basis for docent training practices as well as prescriptive advice for quality docent education; however, detailed information about the actual practices being implemented in docent training programs is sparse. Studies have shown that museum educators agree with and encourage documented educational theories in museums in terms of the exhibits and interpretive materials, however, when instructing the docents within their museums, the museum educators may not be utilizing the theories that they espouse. The evidence in teacher education as well as museum education shows that modeling of the intended strategies is the preferred method for instruction, but evidence of docent training practices gives little proof of this idea being practiced. The current study was designed to uncover the actual practices and theories being utilized in docent training programs across the United States in museums that are accredited by the American Alliance of Museums. Additionally, the Adult Learning Model for Faculty Development (Lawler & King, 2000), a model recommended for the planning and implementation of adult education is applied as a map to guide the inquiry regarding docent training programs. COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS iv DEDICATION This paper is dedicated to my family. For my children, Mac and Tatum, who inspire me to do more than I thought I ever could. You are my reason for doing hard things. Now it’s your turn. For my husband, Darin, who allows me to chase my dreams without letting me fly too far away. For my sisters, Karmen and Lindsay, who always hear me out, cheer me on, and make my heart sing. You are my best friends! To my beautiful mom, Judy, who showed me how to be strong when it would be much easier to be weak. You are faith personified. If only my dad could see me now... COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to my dissertation committee – the trifecta of strong, smart women. My dissertation chair, Dr. Allison Baer, who knows how to ask the best questions; the kind of questions that one needs to be asked in order to transform fuzzy little thoughts into a polished purpose. Her expectations were never beyond reach, but always caused me to stretch farther than I knew I could. Dr. Mary Heather Munger and Dr. Amanda Ochsner who encouraged me with kind words, thoughtful critique, and honest feedback. Your expertise and positive energy were beacons when I was weary. I appreciate your support and guidance every step of the way. Thank you to the University of Findlay College of Education faculty and staff. Your caring attitudes and wealth of knowledge gave me the tools I needed to persevere to the end. Dr. John Gilham, thank you for creating a purpose-driven program. Dr. Julie McIntosh, thank you for the professionalism and strong leadership that you give to the College of Education faculty, creating a positive, supportive culture where ideas are encouraged and celebrated. Thank you to my doctoral cohort. It has been a pleasure knowing you and learning from you. We did it! To the Mazza Museum Docents, your love of learning is beautiful and your dedication to education was the inspiration for my dissertation. My gratitude to the late, Dr. Jerry Mallett who taught me that children’s literature is more than just literature for children; it’s a road map for living. Deepest thanks to Mr. Benjamin E. Sapp, the person who was willing to take a chance on me. Your trust and generous spirit have allowed me to open new doors, making it possible for me to go on this amazing journey. COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Background of the Problem ....................................................................................... 3 Rationale & Significance of the Study....................................................................... 14 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................. 18 Theoretical Framework .............................................................................................. 18 Research Questions .................................................................................................... 20 Definition of Terms.................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................. 25 History of Museum Education ................................................................................... 27 Formal and Informal Learning .................................................................................. 31 Nonformal Learning and Adult Education ................................................................ 33 The Adult Learning Model for Faculty Development ............................................... 35 Pre-Planning: Docent Education .................................................................... 38 Planning: Pedagogical Content Knowledge.................................................... 42 Planning: Adult Learning Theories ................................................................ 47 Planning: Content and Methods of Adult Education ..................................... 52 Delivery: Museum Education Standards ....................................................... 54 Follow-Up: Evaluations ................................................................................. 57 Summary .................................................................................................................... 60 CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 62 Research Questions .................................................................................................... 63 COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT TRAINING PROGRAMS vii Research Design......................................................................................................... 64 Participants ................................................................................................................. 67 Instrumentation & Data Sources ................................................................................ 69 Data Collection Procedures ........................................................................................ 71 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................. 72 Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 75 CHAPTER IV. RESULTS .................................................................................................... 76 Research Question 1 .................................................................................................. 79 Code 1: Pre-Planning ................................................................................... 80 Pre-Training Subcategory .................................................................. 81 Type of Training Subcategory ........................................................... 82 Department Involved in Training Subcategory .................................. 83 Budget Subcategory ........................................................................... 84 Training Schedule Subcategory.... ..................................................... 85 Framework Subcategory.......... .......................................................... 87 Code 2: Planning ... ....................................................................................... 91 Technology ...... ................................................................................. 92 Special Guest Speakers .................................................................… 93 Specific Topics................................................................................... 93 Mode of Communication ................................................................... 94 Code 3: Delivery ........................................................................................... 95 Code 4: Follow-Up ....................................................................................... 96 Research Question 2 .................................................................................................. 97 COMPONENTS FOUND IN DOCENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018
    PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018 Salus University, Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ​ Bachelors of Science in Biology May 2013 College of Chemical and Life Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD ​ EMPLOYMENT Assistant Faculty of Ophthalmology January 2019- present Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine ◾ Provide comprehensive eye services specializing in the diagnosis and management of ocular diseases, conditions and post-operative surgical care in areas such as: dry eye, ocular allergy, macular degeneration, retinal pathologies, diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma, LASIK care, and cataracts; as well as, eye examinations and contact lens fittings Optometrist August 2018- December 2018 National Vision, Inc. ◾ Provide comprehensive eye exams, contact lense fittings and assistance in the referral and management of glaucoma, diabetes and cataract patients ◾ Treat minor ocular service conditions like blepharitis, ocular allergy and dry eye Optical Principles and Ophthalmic Application Teaching Assistant August 2015-May 2016 Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ◾ Assisted first year optometry students at the Pennsylvania College of Optometry with challenging course topics ◾ Mentored underclassmen on how to succeed in the course based on prior experience Vision Therapist September 2011-2014 Appelbaum Eye Care Associates, Bethesda, MD ◾ Provided assistance on vision therapy exercises to patients with binocular vision and ocular motor dysfunctions ◾ Performed
    [Show full text]
  • AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees
    AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees The American Academy of Anesthesiologist Assistants is dedicated to maintaining the standards of the profession and the specialty by remaining current with the ongoing changes and emerging needs in health care delivery while promoting the safety and upholding the rights of all patients undergoing medical treatment involving an anesthesia provider. A recent proliferation of entry-level clinical doctorate degrees into the educational models of non-physician providers has caused a commensurate increase in the use of the title “doctor” in the healthcare system. Inappropriately, the title "resident" and "doctor" has been used in the clinical setting by students and graduates of these programs despite their non-physician status. This trend is a recognized source of potential confusion for patients concerning their medical care and has potential negative implications with respect to scope of practice infringement and conflict of interest, decreased professional diversity, increased health care costs, and aggravation of provider shortages. The AAAA believes that the practice of medicine remains the domain of physicians and that the entry-level doctorate degree for the practice of medicine is the MD/DO. Physicians are integral members and leaders of the health care team. In the interest of patient safety, Anesthesiologist Assistants practice exclusively in, promote, and are dedicated to the Anesthesia Care Team as defined by the AAAA and ASA. The AAAA is committed to instilling confidence in the public by encouraging practitioners to adhere to established ethical norms and regional legal constraints. Furthermore, we believe in optimizing the use of all provider resources to deliver health care to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting For?
    FROM THE PA EDITOR-IN-CHIEF The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting for? he increasingly complex health care it matured from the “first-generation” con- system in the United States relies cept (which was quite similar to the PhD in T heavily on quality improvement, in- structure) to “second-generation,” which is terprofessional collaboration, patient out- more focused on discipline and workplace comes, health policy legislation, and advo- realities.3,5 In general, these professional cacy. While important, most of these factors doctorates can be earned in less time are outside the scope of the traditional mas- than a PhD and do not require original ter’s-level education program—necessitat- research. ing the development of methods to help Over the past two decades, more than advanced practice providers, including NPs 500 unique professional practice doc- Randy D. Danielsen, and PAs, obtain additional skills. The solu- torate programs have emerged across PhD, PA, DFAAPA tion of choice, for many professions, has the US, in fields ranging from nursing to been the introduction of the “professional bioethics. One of the most prominent is doctorate” as a complementary alternative the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), to the typical research-focused doctoral designed for RNs seeking a post-profes- program, such as the PhD. sional degree in nursing. In 2004, follow- Traditional PhD curricula prepare in- ing three years of research by a task force, dividuals to perform re- the American Associa- search that is typically tion of Colleges of Nursing specialized and confined To be recognized (AACN) endorsed the DNP, to their field of study.1 as a full professional, with the goal that it would While this research does one must be equipped become the minimum produce new knowledge, educational standard for it usually remains in the to address practical advanced practice nurses realm of academia and problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics
    Dongbin Kim Cindy Otts The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics Introduction Graduate schools prepare students not only for fu- ture careers in academia, but also for leadership positions in govern- ment, business, non-profit organizations, and other industries. Given the likelihood of doctoral degree recipients being active in research or lead- ership positions, they may have considerable opportunity to influence public policy. In a global, knowledge-driven economy, the need for a highly educated workforce is vital to maintaining the nation’s status and economy. Doctoral-granting institutions, therefore, play an important role in educating academicians and professionals alike who can take the lead in this highly interdependent world. Unfortunately, the nation’s graduate schools fail to fully educate many students who enter doctoral programs because the programs are plagued by high attrition rates. This material is based upon work supported by the Association for Institutional Re- search, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, and the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative under Association for Institu- tional Research Grant Number 223. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recom- mendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association for Institutional Research, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, or the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. Authors thank the anonymous reviewers for comments and encouragements on ear- lier drafts. Dongbin Kim is an assistant professor in the department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • (2) of Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and On
    Internal Regulations of the University of West Bohemia In accordance with Article 36 (2) of Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and on Amendments and Supplements to Other Acts (the Higher Education Act), the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports registered, on 5 June 2017, under Ref. No. MSMT- 16039/2017, Habilitation Procedure and Professor Appointment Procedure Regulations. ………………………………………. Mgr. Karolína Gondková Director of the Higher Education Department HABILITATION PROCEDURE AND PROFESSOR APPOINTMENT PROCEDURE REGULATIONS Dated 5 June 2017 [Note: Habilitation is a Czech academic procedure whereby a person is awarded the academic rank of Docent, which is usually considered equivalent to Associate Professor.] PART ONE General Provisions Article 1 General Provisions (1) This Internal Regulation formulates rules for the habilitation and professor appointment procedures at the University of West Bohemia (hereinafter referred to as "UWB"). (2) Provisions concerning the relevant Scientific Board shall also apply to the Artistic Board, where established. (3) UWB, or a relevant Faculty, shall publish these Habilitation Procedure and Professor Appointment Procedure Regulations in accordance with Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and on Amendments and Supplements to Other Acts (the Higher Education Act), as amended, (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The public may read a habilitation thesis before its defence at the Dean's office of the relevant Faculty, or at the Research and Development Division, if a habilitation procedure is conducted by UWB. Article 2 Authorisation to Conduct a Habilitation Procedure or Professor Appointment Procedure (1) A habilitation procedure or professor appointment procedure shall be conducted in accordance with the Act in fields for which UWB, or a Faculty, has received accreditation.
    [Show full text]
  • PATHWAYS to Phd and Other Doctoral Degrees
    You are eligible for admission to a Doctoral Degree if you have one of the following qualifications with at least 40CP (or equivalent) research component, having achieved specific Thesis and GPA requirements: • Bachelor Honours Degree (AQF Level 8) • Masters Degree, Coursework, Research, Extended (AQF Level 9). • Graduate Diploma of Research Studies – each Academic Group at Griffith has discipline specific qualifications If you do not have one of the qualifications listed above which includes the required minimum research component, based on your highest qualification achieved you will be eligible for admission to a Doctoral degree by undertaking further study as follows, provided you achieve specific Thesis and GPA requirements: Having successfully completed one of the following awards: • Bachelor Degree (AQF Level 7) • Graduate Certificate / Graduate Diploma (AQF Level 8) that does not contain at least 40CP research component • Masters Degree (Coursework - AQF Level 9) that does not contain at least 40CP research component Bachelor Honours Complete one of the following awards to be eligible for admission to a Doctoral Degree: (AQF 8) (1 Year) • Bachelor Honours degree (1 year, 80CP) with Class I or IIA • Postgraduate coursework or research program with at least 40CP or equivalent research component. Click here for a complete list of approved programs at Griffith University which provide this pathway to PhD. PATHWAYS to PhD and other Doctoral Degrees Bachelor Honours (AQF 8) (4+Years) with Class I or IIA Bachelor Honours Masters Research
    [Show full text]
  • In Christian Leadership
    DOCTOR OF EDUCATION IN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP PROGRAM PROSPECTUS SCHOOL OF DIVINITY 2017-2018 ACADEMIC YEAR PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Doctor of Education (EdD) in Christian Leadership is a fully online, praxis degree. It is the highest academic degree offered in the theory and practice of Christian leadership. As an applied theological degree, the EdD in Christian Leadership intentionally seeks to integrate a Christian worldview with study in the fields of leadership, education, and the social sciences. Since leadership, education, and the social sciences are connected fields of study, rooted in a shared theory base; this program will enable students to acquire a breadth of knowledge across these disciplines and gain the skills needed to conduct doctoral level research appropriate to diverse educational, organizational, and ministry contexts. This document is intended to acquaint the reader with the program and answer many initial questions. Please feel free to contact the program director, Dr. Gary Bredfeldt, at [email protected], with any additional questions. PURPOSE The EdD in Christian Leadership program is a research-based, terminal degree, designed to prepare further and equip demonstrated leaders with research, teaching, management, and leadership competencies for executive-level leadership roles in churches, mission organizations, faith-based organizations, non-profit organizations, and Christian academic institutions. LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATION PHILOSOPHY With regards to leadership philosophy, this program is built upon an analytical framework that understands faith-based organizations to be dynamic and developmental. This program promotes a balanced model of Christian leadership that recognizes the importance of biblical values, inspiring vision, godly virtues, and attention to the details of venture management.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Granting Docent Status
    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES 11 June 2015 JURFAK 2015/49 Appendix 1 UPPSALA UNIVERSITY DECISION Board of the Faculty of Law 17 October 2013 (revised on 11 June 2015) Guidelines for granting docent status 1. Purpose of appointing docents at the Faculty of Law The purpose of granting the title or position of ‘docent’1 at the Faculty of Law is to clearly recognise a person’s special academic expertise. Docent status may be conferred if it may be beneficial to the research and education. A docent is required to be active in education at postgraduate (research) level in various ways, such as providing proficient supervision and undertaking the role of ‘opponent’ in disputations (public defences of PhD theses). Obtaining docent status therefore presupposes academic qualifications over and above a doctoral degree. Docent status may normally be conferred only in a subject in which education at postgraduate level is provided at the Faculty. A person who has gained docent status at another higher education institution may not be granted docent status in the same subject at the Faculty of Law in Uppsala. 2. Consultation A person wishing to be granted docent status is recommended first to raise the matter informally with the Chair of the Research Committee. The Chair must then consult one or more subject representatives on the matter. Advice not to continue does not constitute any formal impediment to proceeding with the application. 3. Conferral requirements for applicants lacking positions at the Faculty of Law If applicants have no permanent or time-limited appointment at the Faculty of Law, subject representatives must issue special statements of opinion regarding the manner in which the grant of docent status could benefit research and education at the Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Doctorate? CGS Acknowledges the Generous Support of Our Sponsor for the 2016 Strategic Leaders Global Summit: Table of Contents
    Tenth Annual Strategic Leaders Global Summit on Graduate Education November 15-17, 2016 University of São Paulo Brazil What Is a Doctorate? CGS acknowledges the generous support of our sponsor for the 2016 Strategic Leaders Global Summit: Table of Contents 2016 Strategic Leaders Global Summit on Graduate Education: Agenda Papers Introduction Suzanne T. Ortega, Council of Graduate Schools 10 1: Current and Evolving Definitions of the Doctorate Presented Papers Hans-Joachim Bungartz, Technical University of Munich 14 Denise Cuthbert, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University 17 Susan Porter, University of British Columbia 20 Mark J.T. Smith, Purdue University 23 Shireen Motala, University of Johannesburg 26 Brenda Yeoh, National University of Singapore 30 2: Doctoral Admissions and Recruitment: Assessing Readiness to Pursue Doctoral Study David G. Payne, Educational Testing Service 36 Adham Ramadan, American University in Cairo 39 Yaguang Wang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 42 Kate Wright, University of Western Australia 44 3: Doctoral Mentoring & Supervision Vahan Agopyan, University of São Paulo 48 Mee-Len Chye, The University of Hong Kong 50 Richard (Dick) Strugnell, University of Melbourne 52 Tao Tao, Xiamen University 56 Qiang Yao, Tsinghua University 59 4: Career Preparation & Innovations in Doctoral Curricula and Training Jani Brouwer, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile 62 Karen Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University 64 Barbara Crow, York University 66 5: Doctoral Dissertations and Capstones Marie Audette, Laval University 68 Alastair McEwan, University of Queensland 71 Christopher Sindt, Saint Mary’s College of California 74 6: How Do Doctoral Assessment & Career Tracking Influence Definitions of Doctoral Education? Philippe-Edwin Bélanger, Université du Québec 78 Luke Georghiou, University of Manchester 80 Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Pathway Frequently Asked Questions
    Doctoral Pathway Frequently Asked Questions What are the different types of doctoral programs in education? Broadly speaking, there are two types of educational doctoral degrees: a Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy) and Ed.D. (Doctor of Education). A Ph.D. tends to be more theoretical, while a Ed.D. tends to be more applied. We sometimes refer to a Ph.D. as being an academic doctoral degree, while an Ed.D. degree is called a professional doctoral degree. Ph.D programs almost always have a thesis component as a culminating assignment. Ed.D. degrees usually have either a thesis or a major project as a culminating assignment. People tend to be more familiar with Ph.Ds than Ed.D. degrees, although there are some high profile Ed.D degrees around the world (e.g., Harvard has one). You’ll find that there are lots of university and college professors who have Ed.Ds rather than Ph.Ds. You’ll also find people with Ed.Ds and Ph.Ds working at the Ministry as well as in senior leadership positions at the Board level. Both are prestigious doctoral-level degrees. Why would I want a Ph.D or an Ed.D? If you want to be a university professor, you will need a Ph.D. or Ed.D. Many Ontario Colleges are also preferentially hiring instructors with a Ph.D. or Ed.D. An Ed.D. or Ph.D. might make you a stronger candidate if you want to work at the ministry, or at a school board, or as an educational consultant of some kind.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Education
    College of Education William Speer, College of Education Interim Dean (1998), Professor; B.S., M.S., Ed., Northern Illinois The College of Education is committed to creating an University; Ph.D., Kent State University. intellectual environment that promotes quality instruction, significant research, and professional Types of Degrees Offered through the College of service. Particular attention is focused on preparing Education professionals for diverse educational settings and on Doctoral Degrees in Education contributing to educational and pedagogical Masters and Educational Specialist Degrees knowledge through scholarly endeavors. The College Licensure Programs provides leadership in both the art and science of educational practice. Furthermore, the College is Doctoral Degrees in Education committed to creating an inclusive learning The College of Education offers the Doctor of environment that values and promotes diversity. Philosophy (Ph.D.) and the Doctor of Education Collaboration among students, faculty, other (Ed.D.) degrees. professionals, and community members is essential to Doctor of Philosophy programs are designed to the College in achieving its goals. Integral to the prepare individuals to become skilled researchers, mission is a dedication to being a premier college of university faculty, and leaders in school districts and education that serves our dynamic and expanding community agencies. community, the state, the region, and the nation. Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) programs are designed The College of Education provides dynamic graduate to prepare candidates for a lifetime of professional programs that engage students in field-based practice service, effective practice, and the application of and research, offering students an exciting inquiry. opportunity to study at a nationally recognized The following doctoral degrees are offered: university situated within one of the fastest growing Ed.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Country Statistics Population: 142,257,519 (July 2017 Est.) Ethnic Groups: Russian 78%, Tatar 4%, Other 18%
    Russia Country Statistics Population: 142,257,519 (July 2017 est.) Ethnic Groups: Russian 78%, Tatar 4%, Other 18% Religions: Russian Orthodox 15-20%, Muslim 10-15%, Other 70-60% Languages: Russian (official) 86%, Tatar 4%, Other 10% Area: 17,098,242 sq km (approximately 1.8 times the size of the US) Government Type: Semi-Presidential Federation National Capital: Moscow Currency: Russian Rubles (RUB) Educational System Grading Scale – All Levels Secondary Reported Grade Translation US Certificate of Basic General Education Grades 1-9 Equiv Аттестат об основном общем образовании 5 Отлично Excellent A Attestat ob osnovnom obschem obrazovanii Otlichno Certificate of (Complete) General Secondary Education Grades 10-11 4 Хорошо Good B Аттестат о среднем (полном) общем образовании Khorosho Attestat o srednem (polnom) obschem obrazovanii 3 Удовлетворительно Satisfactory C Udovletvoritel’no Postsecondary 2 Неудовлетвори- Unsatisfactory F Russia is a member of the European Higher Education Area and is part of the Bologna Process as of 2003. тельно Bachelor’s Diploma 4 years Neudovletvoritel’no Диплом бакалавра 1 Неудовлетвори- Unsatisfactory F Diplom Bakalavra тельно Specialist’s Diploma 5-6 years Neudovletvoritel’no Диплом специалиста] – Зачет Pass P Diplom Spetsialista Zachet Master’s Diploma 2 years Диплом магистра Diplom Magistra Diploma of Candidate of Sciences 3 or more years Диплом кандидата наук Diplom Kandidata Nauk IU Placement Recommendations Freshman • Certificate of (Complete) General Secondary Education Transfer • 1-3 years undergraduate study • Specialist’s Degree program when a graduation certificate was not obtained Graduate • Bachelor’s Diploma • Specialist’s Diploma when a graduation certificate was obtained Required Academic Records Undergraduate Applications • Lower Secondary School Transcript o For Grade 9 • Upper Secondary Transcript • Certificate of (Complete) General Secondary Education Graduate Applications For transcripts, alternatively we can accept the Diploma Supplement if accompanied by the degree certificate.
    [Show full text]