DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama** NATIONAL WILD RIVER William B. Bankhead National Forest 5,455 106 5,561 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER William B. Bankhead National Forest 3,395 457 3,852 Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama** Totals 8,850 563 9,413 Alabama Totals 8,850 563 9,413 Arizona Fossil Creek, Arizona** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Coconino National Forest 1,767 0 1,767 Tonto National Forest 1,150 0 1,150 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Coconino National Forest 1,124 16 1,140 Tonto National Forest 1,130 6 1,136 Fossil Creek, Arizona** Totals 5,171 22 5,193 Verde, Arizona** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Coconino National Forest 516 0 516 Tonto National Forest 6,227 0 6,227 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Coconino National Forest 2,883 0 2,883 Prescott National Forest 2,143 25 2,168 Tonto National Forest 656 0 656 Verde, Arizona** Totals 12,425 25 12,450 Arizona Totals 17,596 47 17,643 Arkansas Big Piney Creek, Arkansas** NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 6,454 775 7,229 Big Piney Creek, Arkansas** Totals 6,454 775 7,229 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Buffalo, Arkansas** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Ozark National Forest 2,870 0 2,870 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 1,915 0 1,915 Buffalo, Arkansas** Totals 4,785 0 4,785 Cossatot River, Arkansas** NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ouachita National Forest* 2,595 215 2,810 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Ouachita National Forest* 965 326 1,291 Cossatot River, Arkansas** Totals 3,560 541 4,101 Hurricane Creek, Arkansas** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Ozark National Forest 754 1 755 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 2,949 147 3,096 Hurricane Creek, Arkansas** Totals 3,703 148 3,851 Little Missouri, Arkansas** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Ouachita National Forest* 1,017 0 1,017 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ouachita National Forest* 2,987 100 3,087 Little Missouri, Arkansas** Totals 4,004 100 4,104 Mulberry River, Arkansas** NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 1,659 287 1,946 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 134 134 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Ozark National Forest 2,682 776 3,458 Mulberry River, Arkansas** Totals 4,341 1,197 5,538 North Sylamore Creek, Arkansas** NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 3,600 47 3,647 North Sylamore Creek, Arkansas** Totals 3,600 47 3,647 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Richland Creek, Arkansas** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Ozark National Forest 1,189 2 1,191 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Ozark National Forest 2,371 126 2,497 Richland Creek, Arkansas** Totals 3,560 128 3,688 Arkansas Totals 34,007 2,936 36,943 California Bautista Creek, California** NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 2,998 229 3,227 Bautista Creek, California** Totals 2,998 229 3,227 Big Sur, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Los Padres National Forest 5,912 0 5,912 Big Sur, California Totals 5,912 0 5,912 Black Butte River, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Mendocino National Forest 4,563 720 5,283 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Mendocino National Forest 428 634 1,062 Mendocino Other 4 0 4 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 279 279 Black Butte River, California** Totals 4,995 1,633 6,628 Cottonwood Creek, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Inyo National Forest* 5,407 0 5,407 Cottonwood Creek, California** Totals 5,407 0 5,407 Eel, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Mendocino National Forest 6,550 335 6,885 Six Rivers National Forest 4,096 511 4,607 Eel, California** Totals 10,646 846 11,492 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Feather, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Plumas National Forest 12,386 461 12,847 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Plumas National Forest 1,823 42 1,865 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Plumas National Forest 5,024 415 5,439 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 3,766 3,766 Feather, California Totals 19,233 4,684 23,917 Fuller Mill Creek, California** NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 636 235 871 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 72 95 167 Fuller Mill Creek, California** Totals 708 330 1,038 Kern, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Inyo National Forest* 9,576 1 9,577 Sequoia National Forest 10,830 0 10,830 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 79 79 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Inyo National Forest* 1,441 219 1,660 Kern, California Totals 21,847 299 22,146 Kern, California** NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Inyo National Forest* 215 0 215 Sequoia National Forest 2,943 98 3,041 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 10 10 Kern, California** Totals 3,158 108 3,266 Kings, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Sequoia National Forest 1,772 0 1,772 Sierra National Forest 2,982 0 2,982 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 18 18 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Sequoia National Forest 2,976 0 2,976 Kings, California Totals 7,730 18 7,748 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Klamath, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Klamath National Forest* 101 10 111 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Klamath National Forest* 5,384 380 5,764 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Klamath National Forest* 38,852 4,917 43,769 Six Rivers National Forest 2,520 31 2,551 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 1 1 Klamath, California Totals 46,857 5,339 52,196 Merced, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Sierra National Forest 5,038 53 5,091 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Sierra National Forest 870 6 876 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Sierra National Forest 1,507 109 1,616 Stanislaus National Forest 1,510 190 1,700 Stanislaus Other 3 0 3 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 723 723 Merced, California Totals 8,928 1,081 10,009 North Fork American, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Tahoe National Forest 8,326 195 8,521 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 3,283 3,283 North Fork American, California Totals 8,326 3,478 11,804 North Fork San Jacinto, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 1,405 687 2,092 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 520 0 520 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 306 72 378 North Fork San Jacinto, California** Totals 2,231 759 2,990 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Owens River Headwaters, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Inyo National Forest* 1,734 0 1,734 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Inyo National Forest* 1,952 0 1,952 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Inyo National Forest* 1,773 21 1,794 Owens River Headwaters, California** Totals 5,459 21 5,480 Palm Canyon Creek, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER San Bernardino National Forest 2,405 0 2,405 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 45 45 Palm Canyon Creek, California** Totals 2,405 45 2,450 Piru Creek, California** NATIONAL WILD RIVER Angeles National Forest 597 0 597 Los Padres National Forest 550 0 550 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Angeles National Forest 508 0 508 Los Padres National Forest 441 0 441 Piru Creek, California** Totals 2,096 0 2,096 Sespe Creek, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Los Padres National Forest 7,093 161 7,254 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Los Padres National Forest 1,222 311 1,533 Sespe Creek, California Totals 8,315 472 8,787 Sisquoc, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Los Padres National Forest 10,082 20 10,102 Sisquoc, California Totals 10,082 20 10,102 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wild and Scenic River CLASSIFICATION NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Smith River, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 26,596 168 26,764 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 10,770 111 10,881 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 27,477 1,601 29,078 Smith River, California Totals 64,843 1,880 66,723 Trinity, California NATIONAL WILD RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 28 0 28 Trinity National Forest 14,903 708 15,611 NATIONAL SCENIC RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 31 0 31 Trinity National Forest 7,245 1,984 9,229 NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER Six Rivers National Forest 8,809 5,718 14,527 Trinity National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game
    July 24, 2006 Ryan Broderick, Director California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Improving efficiency of California’s fish hatchery system Dear Director Broderick: On behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity, we are writing to express our concerns about the state’s fish hatchery and stocking system and to recommend needed changes that will ensure that the system does not negatively impact California’s native biological diversity. This letter is an update to our letter of August 31, 2005. With this letter, we are enclosing many of the scientific studies we relied on in developing this letter. Fish hatcheries and the stocking of fish into lakes and streams cause numerous measurable, significant environmental effects on California ecosystems. Based on these impacts, numerous policy changes are needed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game’s (“DFG”) operation of the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not adversely affect California’s environment. Further, as currently operated, the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, Administrative Procedures Act, California Endangered Species Act, and federal Endangered Species Act. The impacts to California’s environment, and needed policy changes to bring the state’s hatchery and stocking program into compliance with applicable state and federal laws, are described below. I. FISH STOCKING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS CALIFORNIA’S NATIVE SALMONIDS, INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Introduced salmonids negatively impact native salmonids in a variety of ways. Moyle, et. al. (1996) notes that “Introduction of non-native fish species has also been the single biggest factor associated with fish declines in the Sierra Nevada.” Moyle also notes that introduced species are contributing to the decline of 18 species of native Sierra Nevada fish species, and are a major factor in the decline of eight of those species.
    [Show full text]
  • Inyo National Forest Visitor Guide
    >>> >>> Inyo National Forest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Visitor Guide >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> $1.00 Suggested Donation FRED RICHTER Inspiring Destinations © Inyo National Forest Facts “Inyo” is a Paiute xtending 165 miles Bound ary Peak, South Si er ra, lakes and 1,100 miles of streams Indian word meaning along the California/ White Mountain, and Owens River that provide habitat for golden, ENevada border between Headwaters wildernesses. Devils brook, brown and rainbow trout. “Dwelling Place of Los Angeles and Reno, the Inyo Postpile Nation al Mon ument, Mam moth Mountain Ski Area National Forest, established May ad min is tered by the National Park becomes a sum mer destination for the Great Spirit.” 25, 1907, in cludes over two million Ser vice, is also located within the mountain bike en thu si asts as they acres of pris tine lakes, fragile Inyo Na tion al For est in the Reds ride the chal leng ing Ka mi ka ze Contents Trail from the top of the 11,053-foot mead ows, wind ing streams, rugged Mead ow area west of Mam moth Wildlife 2 Sierra Ne va da peaks and arid Great Lakes. In addition, the Inyo is home high Mam moth Moun tain or one of Basin moun tains. El e va tions range to the tallest peak in the low er 48 the many other trails that transect Wildflowers 3 from 3,900 to 14,494 feet, pro vid­ states, Mt. Whitney (14,494 feet) the front coun try of the forest. Wilderness 4-5 ing diverse habitats that sup port and is adjacent to the lowest point Sixty-five trailheads provide Regional Map - North 6 vegetation patterns ranging from in North America at Badwater in ac cess to over 1,200 miles of trail Mono Lake 7 semiarid deserts to high al pine Death Val ley Nation al Park (282 in the 1.2 million acres of wil der- meadows.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California
    Upper Piru Creek Wild Trout Management Plan 2012-2017 State of California Department of Fish and Game Heritage and Wild Trout Program South Coast Region Prepared by Roger Bloom, Stephanie Mehalick, and Chris McKibbin 2012 Table of contents Executive summary .................................................................................. 3 Resource status ........................................................................................ 3 Area description ...................................................................................................... 3 Land ownership/administration ............................................................................... 4 Public access .......................................................................................................... 4 Designations ........................................................................................................... 4 Area maps............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1. Vicinity map of upper Piru Creek watershed ............................................ 5 Figure 2. Map of upper Piru Creek Heritage and Wild Trout-designated reach....... 6 Fishery description.................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3. Photograph of USGS gaging station near confluence of Piru and Buck creeks ..................................................................................................................... 7
    [Show full text]
  • Concerning the USDA Forest Service a LISTING of VARIOUS HISTORICAL REFERENCES CONCERNING TUE USDA-FOREST SERVICE*
    United States Department of Agricuuure A Listing of Various Forest Service Pacific Historical References Northwest Region Concerning the USDA Forest Service A LISTING OF VARIOUS HISTORICAL REFERENCES CONCERNING TUE USDA-FOREST SERVICE* Compiled By Gerald W. Williams Sociologist and Social Historian Umpqua National Forest P.O. Box 1008 Roseburg, Oregon 97470 May 3, 1982 *Note: The following listing of historical references is only preliminary. It is intended to "spark" the interest of other historical research orientated persons in the Forest Service. Hopefully, other reference materials will be forwarded to the compiler so that a more complete listing will be available to historians, both USFS and other interested Forest historians. Many of the following references are available at the Regional Office in Portland and through the compiler. The reference to Timberlines in the following list refers to the annual publication of the Thirty Year Club (retirees from Region Six). TABLE OF CONTENTS page 1 Section One: USFS History - General History 2 a. The National Level USFS Organization and Perspective 8 b. USFS - Special Historical Topics at the National Level 13 Section Two: USFS - History of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) 14 a. The National CCC Organization and Perspective 16 b. The CCC Program in the Pacific Northwest Region 17 Section Three: USFS - Regional Histories 18 a. Pacific Northwest Region (R-6) - General History 24 b. Other USFS Regions - General History 27 Section Four: USFS - National Forest Histories 28 a. Forest Histories - Pacific Northwest Region 36 b. Forest Histories - Other USFS Regions 37 Section 5: Related Forest History Topics 38 a. Other Federal and State Agencies, Including BLM and NPS 42 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Longley Meadows Fish Habitat Enhancement Project
    United States Department of Agriculture Bonneville Power Administration Forest Service Department of Energy Longley Meadows Fish Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment La Grande Ranger District, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Union County, Oregon October 2019 For More Information Contact: Bill Gamble, District Ranger La Grande Ranger District 3502 Highway 30 La Grande, OR 97850 Phone: 541-962-8582 Fax: 541-962-8580 Email: [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Fescue Rangelands: Changes Over Time in the Wallowa Mountains
    United States Department of Agriculture Green Fescue Rangelands: Forest Service Changes Over Time in the Pacific Northwest Research Station Wallowa Mountains General Technical Report PNW-GTR-569 Charles G. Johnson, Jr. February 2003 Author Charles G. Johnson, Jr. is the area plant ecologist, Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National For- ests. His office is located at the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City, OR 97814. Cover Photo Leaving Tenderfoot Basin following 60th-year revisitation of Reid’s study sites. Photo by David Jensen. Unless otherwise noted, all photographs were taken by the author. Abstract Johnson, Charles G., Jr. 2003. Green fescue rangelands: changes over time in the Wallowa Mountains. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-569. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 41 p. This publication documents over 90 years of plant succession on green fescue grasslands in the subalpine eco- logical zone of the Wallowa Mountains in northeast Oregon. It also ties together the work of four scientists over a 60-year period. Arthur Sampson initiated his study of deteriorated rangeland in 1907. Elbert H. Reid began his studies of overgrazing in 1938. Both of these individuals utilized high-elevation green fescue grasslands in differ- ent locations in the Wallowa Mountains for their study areas. Then in 1956, Gerald Strickler returned to the sites previously studied by Sampson and Reid to establish the first permanent monitoring points when he located and staked camera points they had used. He also established line transects where he photographed and sampled the vegetation to benchmark the condition of the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Abella, S. R. 2010. Disturbance and plant succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:1248—1284. Abella, S. R., D. J. Craig, L. P. Chiquoine, K. A. Prengaman, S. M. Schmid, and T. M. Embrey. 2011. Relationships of native desert plants with red brome (Bromus rubens): Toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:115—124. Abella, S. R., N. A. Fisichelli, S. M. Schmid, T. M. Embrey, D. L. Hughson, and J. Cipra. 2015. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nature Conservation 10:71—94. Available: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407 Abella, S. R., A. A. Suazo, C. M. Norman, and A. C. Newton. 2013. Treatment alternatives and timing affect seeds of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an invasive forb in American Southwest arid lands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:559—567. Available: https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00022.1 Abrahamson, I. 2014. Arctostaphylos manzanita. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System (Online). plants/shrub/arcman/all.html Ackerman, T. L. 1979. Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 24:399—408. Adams, A. W. 1975. A brief history of juniper and shrub populations in southern Oregon. Report No. 6. Oregon State Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, OR. Adams, L. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three species of Ceanothus.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State
    Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Alabama Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama WILD William B. Bankhead National Forest 6,134 110 6,244 SCENIC William B. Bankhead National Forest 3,550 505 4,055 Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Arizona Fossil Creek, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 1,720 0 1,720 Tonto National Forest 1,085 0 1,085 RECREATIONAL Coconino National Forest 1,137 4 1,141 Tonto National Forest 1,136 0 1,136 Fossil Creek, Arizona Totals 5,078 4 5,082 Verde, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 525 0 525 Tonto National Forest 6,234 0 6,234 SCENIC Coconino National Forest 2,862 0 2,862 Prescott National Forest 2,148 25 2,173 Tonto National Forest 649 0 649 Verde, Arizona Totals 12,418 25 12,443 Arizona Totals 17,496 29 17,525 2020 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Arkansas Big Piney Creek, Arkansas SCENIC Ozark National Forest 6,448 781 7,229 Big Piney Creek, Arkansas Totals 6,448 781 7,229 Buffalo, Arkansas WILD Ozark National Forest 2,871 0 2,871 SCENIC Ozark National Forest 1,915 0 1,915 Buffalo, Arkansas Totals 4,785 0 4,786
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fish and Game Commission Designated Wild Trout Waters
    The following waters are designated by the Commission as "wild trout waters": 1. American River, North Fork, from Palisade Creek downstream to Iowa Hill Bridge (Placer County). 2. Carson River, East Fork, upstream from confluence with Wolf Creek excluding tributaries (Alpine County). 3. Clavey River, upstream from confluence with Tuolumne River excluding tributaries (Tuolumne County). 4. Fall River, from Pit No. 1 powerhouse intake upstream to origin at Thousand Springs including Spring Creek, but excluding all other tributaries (Shasta County). 5. Feather River, Middle Fork, from Oroville Reservoir upstream to Sloat vehicle bridge, excluding tributaries (Butte and Plumas counties). 6. Hat Creek, from Lake Britton upstream to Hat No. 2 powerhouse (Shasta County). 7. Hot Creek, from Hot Springs upstream to west property line of Hot Creek Ranch (Mono County). 8. Kings River, from Pine Flat Lake upstream to confluence with South and Middle forks excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 9. Kings River, South Fork, from confluence with Middle Fork upstream to western boundary of Kings Canyon National Park excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 10. Merced River, South Fork, from confluence with mainstem Merced River upstream to western boundary of Yosemite National Park excluding tributaries (Mariposa County). 11. Nelson Creek, upstream from confluence with Middle Fork Feather River excluding tributaries (Plumas County). 12. Owens River, from Five Bridges crossing upstream to Pleasant Valley Dam excluding tributaries (Inyo County). 13. Rubicon River, from confluence with Middle Fork American River upstream to Hell Hole Dam excluding tributaries (Placer County). 14. Yellow Creek, from Big Springs downstream to confluence with the North Fork of the Feather River (Plumas County).
    [Show full text]
  • Data Set Listing (May 1997)
    USDA Forest Service Air Resource Monitoring System Existing Data Set Listing (May 1997) Air Resource Monitoring System (ARMS) Data Set Listing May 1997 Contact Steve Boutcher USDA Forest Service National Air Program Information Manager Portland, OR (503) 808-2960 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 DATA SET DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 National & Multi-Regional Data Sets EPA’S EASTERN LAKES SURVEY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 EPA’S NATIONAL STREAM SURVEY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 EPA WESTERN LAKES SURVEY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) LICHEN MONITORING-------------------------------------------------14 FOREST HEALTH MONITORING (FHM) OZONE BIOINDICATOR PLANTS ----------------------------------15 IMPROVE AEROSOL MONITORING--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 IMPROVE NEPHELOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 IMPROVE TRANSMISSOMETER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION PROGRAM/ NATIONAL TRENDS NETWORK----------------19 NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Club Members Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf4j49n7st No online items Guide to the Sierra Club Members Papers Processed by Lauren Lassleben, Project Archivist Xiuzhi Zhou, Project Assistant; machine-readable finding aid created by Brooke Dykman Dockter The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, CaliforniaGeographical (By Place) --CaliforniaSocial Sciences --Urban Planning and EnvironmentBiological and Medical Sciences --Agriculture --ForestryBiological and Medical Sciences --Agriculture --Wildlife ManagementSocial Sciences --Sports and Recreation Guide to the Sierra Club Members BANC MSS 71/295 c 1 Papers Guide to the Sierra Club Members Papers Collection number: BANC MSS 71/295 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Lauren Lassleben, Project Archivist Xiuzhi Zhou, Project Assistant Date Completed: 1992 Encoded by: Brooke Dykman Dockter © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Sierra Club Members Papers Collection Number: BANC MSS 71/295 c Creator: Sierra Club Extent: Number of containers: 279 cartons, 4 boxes, 3 oversize folders, 8 volumesLinear feet: ca. 354 Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft SEIR Chapter 2 Program Description
    1 Chapter 2 2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 3 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Program Purpose 5 The purpose of the Proposed Program is to establish and implement a permitting program 6 for suction dredging activities consistent with the requirements of Fish and Game Code 7 section 5653 et seq. and the December 2006 Court Order. 8 2.1.2 Program Objectives 9 The objectives of the Proposed Program are as follows: 10 Comply with the December 2006 Court Order; 11 Promulgate amendments to CDFG’s previous regulations as necessary to 12 effectively implement Fish and Game Code sections 5653 and 5653.9 and other 13 applicable legal authorities to ensure that suction dredge mining will not be 14 deleterious to fish; 15 Develop a program that is implementable within the existing fee structure 16 established by statute for the CDFG’s suction dredge permitting program, as well 17 as the existing fee structure established by the CDFG pursuant to Fish and Game 18 Code section 1600 et seq.; 19 Fulfill CDFG’s mission to manage California's diverse fish, wildlife, and plant 20 resources, and the habitats upon which they depend, for their ecological values 21 and for their use and enjoyment by the public; 22 Ensure that the development of the regulations considers economic costs, 23 practical considerations for implementation, and technological capabilities 24 existing at the time of implementation; and 25 Fulfill the CDFG’s obligation to conserve, protect, and manage fish, wildlife, 26 native plants, and habitats necessary for biologically sustainable populations of 27 those species and as a trustee agency for fish and wildlife resources pursuant to 28 Fish and Game Code section 1802.
    [Show full text]