DOCSLIB.ORG

Retributive Justice in the Real World Michael T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retributive Justice in the Real World Michael T Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship 2007 Retributive Justice in the Real World Michael T. Cahill Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation 85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 815 (2007-2008) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE IN THE REAL WORLD MICHAEL T. CAHILL* TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TR O D U CTION ........................................................................................ 816 I. SURVEYING THE O PTIONS .................................................................... 825 A. The Absolutist Model: Avoid All Failures of Desert ............... 826 B. The Threshold Model: Avoid Serious Failures of Desert........ 830 C. ConsequentialistRetributivism: Maximize Desert .................. 833 D. Silence: A Limited Scope for Retributivism............................. 836 E. The Nuclear Option: Abandon Retributivism Altogether ........ 840 ii. APPLYING THE OPTIONS: MAKING RETRIBUTION REAL .................... 842 A . P olice P riorities...................................................................... 843 1. The A bsolutist M odel ....................................................... 848 2. The Threshold M odel ....................................................... 850 3. ConsequentialistRetributivism ........................................ 851 B. ProsecutorialD iscretion ......................................................... 853 1. The A bsolutist M odel ....................................................... 854 2. The Threshold M odel ....................................................... 855 3. ConsequentialistRetributivism ........................................ 855 C. Feedback Effects on Legislative Action ................................... 856 I1. W EIGHING THE O PTIONS ................................................................... 857 A. The Absolutist Model: A PracticalFiasco .............................. 857 B. The Threshold Model: A Conceptual Muddle ......................... 858 C. ConsequentialistRetributivism: A Workable Balance? .......... 861 C O N CLU SIO N ......................................................................................... 870 * © Michael T. Cahill. Associate Professor, Brooklyn Law School. I thank Mitchell Berman, Richard Bierschbach, Edward Cheng, Kimberly Ferzan, Daniel Greenwood, Douglas Husak, Dan Markel, Paul H. Robinson, Lawrence Solan, Lawrence Solum, the participants in the Junior Criminal Faculty Conference hosted by George Washington Law School, and the participants in a Faculty Workshop at Brooklyn Law School, who offered valuable comments and insights after reading earlier drafts of this Article, or in discussions about its topic, or both. I also thank David Kim and Andre Nance for their capable research assistance. Work on this Article was supported by a summer research stipend from Brooklyn Law School, for which I thank the school and Dean Joan Wexler. Please direct comments, questions, or other responses to michael.cahillTbrooklaw.edu. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [VOL. 85:815 INTRODUCTION In 2003, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced a set of Department of Justice (DOJ) policies designed to curtail federal prosecutors' discretion to plea bargain.' The new DOJ rules sought to ensure uniform criminal punishments and prevent criminal offenders from cutting deals to avoid deserved punishment. 2 Yet the would-be ban on bargaining seems to have had little, if any, effect. 3 Such a result is hardly surprising, as the policy's spirit of pursuing justice at all costs, however noble, is unworkable if the pursuers cannot actually pay all costs. Limitations of budget, resources, or evidence inevitably demand some compromises, such as a tradeoff between seeking the maximum punishment for each offender and ensuring some punishment for all 1. See Memorandum from John Ashcrofl, U.S. Att'y Gen., to All Federal Prosecutors, Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing (Sept. 22, 2003), reprinted in 16 FED. SENT'G REP. 129 (2003) [hereinafter Ashcroft Memo]. This memorandum attracted a great deal of attention but followed earlier memoranda by preceding attorneys general who also sought to reduce discretionary bargaining. See, e.g., Reno Bluesheet on Charging and Plea Decisions, from Janet Reno, U.S. Att'y Gen., to Holders of U.S. Attorneys' Manual, Title 9, Principles of Federal Prosecution(Oct. 12, 1993), reprinted in 6 FED. SENT'G REP. 352 (1994); Instructions from Richard Thornburgh, U.S. Att'y Gen., to U.S. Attorneys, Plea Policy for Federal Prosecutors (Mar. 13, 1989), reprinted in 1 FED. SENT'G REP. 421 (1989). The Ashcroft memo charged prosecutors with a duty to "charge and pursue the most serious, readily provable offense or offenses that are supported by the facts of the case," while avoiding charges "filed simply to exert leverage to induce a plea." Ashcroft Memo, supra, at 130. Prosecutors were also not to "request or accede to" a downward sentencing departure except under limited circumstances. Id. at 132. 2. See, e.g., Gwen Filosa, Ashcroft: Ne' Police Powers Make U.S. Safer, TIMES-PICAYUNE (New Orleans, La.), Sept. 26, 2003, at A7 ("'Like federal judges, federal prosecutors have an obligation to be fair, uniform and to be tough,' Ashcroft said. 'The amount of time in prison should depend on the severity of the crime, not on which judge happens to be sentencing him. This is about equal justice under the law.'"); Joe Gyan, Jr., Ashcroft Seeks End to "Revolving Door" for Violent Criminals, ADVOC. (Baton Rouge, La.), Sept. 26, 2003, at 9 ("Ashcroft also defended his get-tough policy, saying the intent is to bring 'uniformity and equality in justice across the board.... We need a policy that says people who commit serious crimes will be held accountable for those crimes ....'); cf George Fisher, A Practice as Old as Justice Itself N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 28, 2003, § 4, at II ("There are good reasons to dislike plea bargains. Justice is dealt behind closed doors rather than in the open air of a courtroom. Prosecutors can hijack sentencing authority from judges, and criminals can get off with less than they deserve."). 3. See, e.g., Albert W. Alschuler, Disparity: The Normative and Empirical Failure of the Federal Guidelines, 58 STAN. L. REv. 85, 113 (2005) ("Like similar directives from Attorneys General before him, Ashcroft's apparent restriction of plea bargaining made headlines. On the surface, it appeared to be a significant reform. The memorandum's exceptions, however, largely swallowed its rule."); cf Mary Patrice Brown & Stevan E.Bunnell, Negotiating Justice: ProsecutorialPerspectives on Federal Plea Bargaining in the District of Columbia, 43 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1063, 1078 (2006) ("Although the Ashcroft Memo did not have a major impact in D.C. on the content of plea agreements, it did tend to streamline plea negotiations ....");Daniel Richman, Institutional Coordination and Sentencing Reform, 84 TEX. L. REV. 2055, 2068 (2006) ("It is far from clear whether the Ashcroft Memorandum had any effect on line prosecutors in U.S. Attorneys' offices."). 2007] RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE IN THE REAL WORLD offenders. Because Ashcroft's memorandum could not articulate clear rules for how or when prosecutors could take these practical constraints into account, the result was more business as usual: unguided 4 and unreviewable exercises of prosecutorial discretion in individual cases. Both the adoption and the failure of the DOJ antibargaining policy underscore a significant but often-ignored difference between the two major theories of criminal law, utilitarianism and retributivism.5 The policy reflected the aspirations of a retributive-justice agenda, seeking fair, uniform, and deserved punishment for all offenders. Yet the policy also reflected the limitations of such an agenda, highlighting its restricted scope relative to that of the rival utilitarian theory. In a meaningful way, utilitarianism provides a complete theory of criminal justice, while retributivism apparently does not. Utilitarianism, which bases punishment on the forward-looking goal of preventing future crime, is not only ajustificatory theory explaining why 4. As Marc Miller pointed out at the time, the Ashcroft memo had more bark than bite, as its policies failed to "confront the major issues that control charging and screening decisions, including the wise use of prosecutorial resources (or in a more negative light, the need for triage) .... " Marc L. Miller, Domination & Dissatisfaction: Prosecutors as Sentencers, 56 STAN. L. REV. 1211, 1257 (2004). Miller concluded: "Even if every line lawyer takes the 2003 policies to heart (a practical impossibility), or applies them aggressively but only fully to address plea bargains (more plausibly), the tough-sounding 2003 policies include exceptions that any wise prosecutor (and there are many wise prosecutors) could drive a truck through." Id. 5. See, e.g., JOSHUA DRESSLER, UNDERSTANDING CRIMINAL LAW § 2.03 (4th ed. 2006) (describing utilitarianism and retributivism); Russell L. Christopher, The Prosecutor's Dilemma: Bargains and Punishments, 72 FORDAM L. REV. 93, 98 99 n.19 (2003) (providing support for the claim that "[t]he two main justifications of punishment are retributivism and consequentialism").
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies Are the Sociology-Based
    Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies are the sociology-based study of crime and the criminal justice system. Our students are prepared for a variety of Our major exposes students to the social career options. Some graduates enter directly dimensions of the crime problem, explanations of into the labor force in these fields: the prevalence of various types of crime, and the various agencies and programs designed to law enforcement prevent and control crime and delinquency. The delinquency prevention latter include the police, courts, probation and delinquency control services parole systems, and correctional institutions. Attention is also given to such issues as women crime prevention and crime, youth and crime, and the place of corrections control agencies in larger societal context. As a probation or parole social science/liberal arts field, criminology criminal justice administration provides majors with a variety of techniques for examining and responding to important questions research about the causes and consequences of crime and fraud investigation the workings of the criminal justice system. loss prevention & asset protection Undergraduate criminology majors are also employed in non-crime related sectors such as: health and social services (substance abuse and rehabilitation counseling) As part of a liberal arts/social science degree, the criminology major provides an excellent community work (child and social background for post-baccalaureate studies. Our welfare agencies) alums pursue graduate work in criminology or in related fields such as sociology, anthropology, federal, state, or local government political science, and psychology. In addition, the (urban planning & housing) major provides a foundation for post-baccalaureate work in law, public policy, social work, business, and urban planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Restorative Versus Retributive Justice Kathleen Daly Reviews the Discourse That Has Framed Restorative Justice As the Antidote to Punishment
    Restorative versus Retributive Justice Kathleen Daly reviews the discourse that has framed restorative justice as the antidote to punishment. n 'Restorative justice: the real story' (Punishment and Advocates seem to assume that an ideal justice system should Society 2002), Kathleen Daly draws on her experience of be of one type only, that it should be pure and not contaminated / restorative justice conferencing and an extensive survey of by or mixed with others. [Even when calling for the need to academic literature to refute four myths that she says have "blend restorative, reparative, and transformative justice... with grown up around restorative justice. These are that: (1) the prosecution of paradigmatic violations of human rights", restorative justice is the opposite of retributive justice; (2) Drambl (2000:296) is unable to avoid using the term 'retributive' restorative justice uses indigenous justice practices and was to refer to responses that should be reserved for the few.] the dominant form ofpre-modern justice; (3) restorative justice Before demonstrating the problems with this position, I give a is a 'care' (or feminine) response to crime in comparison to a sympathetic reading of what I think advocates are trying to say. justice' (or masculine) response; and (4) restorative justice Mead's (1917-18) 'The Psychology of Punitive Justice' can be expected to produce major changes in people. She says contrasts two methods of responding to crime. One he termed that "simple oppositional dualisms are inadequate in depicting"the attitude of hostility toward the lawbreaker" (p. 227), which criminal justice, even in an ideal justice system", and argues "brings with it the attitudes of retribution, repression, and for a 'real story' which would serve the political future of exclusion" (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Juveniles
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. )OS!, 7 JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada ~ " :tment of Justice lvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP Ie * JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada U.S. Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP II ,I;' - c :;;w '&-••1\'£:-.' ¥W, Charles E. Springer is Vice-Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada. Prior to being commissioned to the Supreme Court, he was Juvenile Court Master for the Second Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada from 1973 to 1980. He has also served the State of Nevada as Attorney General. He received the Outstanding Service Award from the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges in 1980 and has served on the Boards and Commissions of numerous civic and State organizations in an effort to improve the quality of justice for adults and juveniles . ........ * & & !MI',. u. S. ~partment of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention NmionallnslituJejiJr Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Juvenile Ju.rl;" Cfrorin8/w"''' NCJRS Box6000. Rochill<. MD 20lJjO Dear Colleague: "Justice for Juveniles" is a serious and deliberative look at the juvenile justice systeln, its philosophical and historical underpinnings, the strengths and weaknesses of today's system, and the implications for its future. Last year over 35,000 juveniles were arrested in this country for violent crimes, including murder, rape, and aggravated assault. The success of this office's e~forts to reduce juvenile crime and create a nlore secure society depends on the ready exchange of information and ideas among professionals in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Criminal Justice Issues
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice CriticalCritical CriminalCriminal JusticeJustice IssuesIssues TaskTask ForceForce ReportsReports FromFrom thethe AmericanAmerican SocietySociety ofof CriminologyCriminology toto AttorneyAttorney GeneralGeneral JanetJanet RenoReno FOREWORD There is a discernible urgency to the crime issue. Crime and the fear of crime rank as the most important issues in public opinion polls. Some communities resemble war zones where gunshots ring out every night. Other cities struggle to create islands of civility amid threats to public order posed by low-level criminal behavior that eludes traditional measures. Appropriately, public policymakers and administrators in the criminal justice system are responding to the issue of crime in all its complexity. Every aspect of the infrastructure of our traditional criminal justice policy is undergo- ing fundamental rethinking. Our approaches to policing, adjudication, sentencing, imprisonment, and community corrections are changing in significant ways. Indeed, communities that are suffering from crime are changing their interactions with the agencies of the criminal justice system as the concepts of community policing, community prosecution, and community justice take on real meaning in cities and towns around the country. This combination—a sense of urgency on the part of the public and a rapidly changing policy response—creates a compelling need for policy-relevant research. When Attorney General Janet Reno addressed the American Society of Criminology at its annual meeting in November 1994, she challenged Society members to translate their re- search findings into recommendations that would benefit the practitioners and policymakers who confront the issues of crime and justice. The reports presented in these pages are the response to that challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons in the United States: a Need for Reform and Educational Rehabilitation
    Merrimack College Merrimack ScholarWorks Social Justice Student Work Social Justice Spring 2019 Prisons in the United States: A need for reform and educational rehabilitation Amanda Alcox Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/sj_studentpub Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, and the Social Justice Commons Running Head: PRISONS IN THE UNITED STATES Prisons in the United States: A need for reform and educational rehabilitation Amanda Alcox Merrimack College SOJ 4900 Professor Mark Allman PRISONS IN THE UNITED STATES 2 Abstract: The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people in 1,719 state prisons, 102 federal prisons, 1,852 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,163 local jails, and 80 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, immigration detention facilities, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric hospitals, and prisons in the U.S. territories. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Ex-convicts express that transitioning back into society, as well as finding employers willing to hire former inmates, is a difficult task. In this capstone, we will look at prison reform from the 1800s-to-today, we will determine which roles retributive and restorative justice play in our criminal justice system, we will recognize the current implications of our current correctional system, we will engage in statistics regarding employment and homelessness rates, we will reminisce on personal experiences as an intern in a correctional facility, and lastly, we will look into programming, educational services, and professional development opportunities for inmates while serving their sentences. To understand social justice ideals, it is necessary to recognize that our nation consists of various structures, policies, and practices that either help or harm the human population.
    [Show full text]
  • "Restorative Justice" in Community Corrections?
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice June 2001 Papers From the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections No. 11 What Future for “Public Safety” About This and “Restorative Justice” in Series Community Corrections? It is by now a commonplace that the number of people under criminal justice supervision by Michael E. Smith in this country has reached a record high. As a result, the sentencing policies driving that number, and the field of corrections, where ublic safety” and “restorative trying to turn his agency from what he the consequences are felt, have acquired an unprecedented salience. It is a salience defined justice” are big ideas now making characterizes as the empty execution of ret- more by issues of magnitude, complexity, and claims on the future of community ributive, court-imposed sanctions, toward “P expense than by any consensus about future corrections. They are appealing as strategic partnership with informal community boards directions. objectives for probation and parole agencies (“reparative boards”) to restore victims, that are unable to generate fiscal and political offenders, and communities.1 Meanwhile, Are sentencing policies, as implemented through correctional programs and practices, achieving support for the modest objectives of “enforc- embracing public safety as the strategic their intended purposes? As expressed in the ing court orders,” “meeting client needs,” objective for corrections, Washington State movement to eliminate indeterminate senten- and “reducing recidivism.” When the two amended its “just deserts”-based corrections cing and limit judicial discretion, on the one ideas are examined more closely, however, law in 1999, effecting a strategic redeploy- hand, and to radically restructure our retribu- their futures seem uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Civic and Legal Exclusions for Persons with Criminal
    Civil disability policies entangle persons with criminal convictions in a web of civic and legal exclusions that revoke or restrict their rights and limit access to services needed for an individual’s successful community reintegration. These policies—also known as collateral consequences—extend the reach of criminal justice punishment long after contact with the formal system has ended. There are now an estimated 40,000 civil disability policies nationwide—policies which affect the daily lives of individuals, touching every aspect from housing and family composition to education and employment opportunities. Just as racial, economic, and behavioral-health disparities exist within the formal criminal justice system, so also the disproportionately negative effects of justice-system involvement play out in the lives and communities devastated by mass incarceration. Civil disability policies exacerbate those effects. As decarceration efforts proceed, we must align civil disability policies and rehabilitative practices to ensure that people with criminal convictions have the greatest possible chance of success. Immediate remediation of civil disability policies is critical to offer persons with criminal convictions the opportunities necessary to lead socially and economically productive lives as parents, family members, and workers in their respective communities. Without revising or, in many cases, eliminating these restrictive policies, our country cannot achieve the rehabilitative goals of the justice system. While some civil disabilities play a healthy role in keeping our communities safe, many such policies serve no useful function other than to further punish defendants beyond court-imposed sentences. We call for a review of current civil disability policies and advocate for immediate policy intervention to align these policies with rehabilitative aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies Is the Sociology-Based
    Criminology & Criminal Justice Studies is the sociology-based study of crime and the criminal justice system. Our students are prepared for a variety of Our major exposes students to the dimensions of career options. Some graduates enter the crime problem, explanations of the prevalence directly into the labor force in these fields: of various types of crime, and the various agencies and programs designed to prevent and law enforcement control crime and delinquency. The latter include delinquency prevention the police, courts, probation and parole systems, and correctional institutions. Attention is also delinquency control services given to such issues as women and crime, youth crime prevention and crime, and the place of control agencies in corrections larger societal context. As a social science/liberal arts field, criminology provides majors with a probation or parole variety of techniques for examining and criminal justice administration responding to important questions about the research causes and consequences of crime and the workings of the criminal justice system. fraud investigation loss prevention & asset protection Undergraduate criminology majors are also employed in non-crime related sectors such as: As part of a liberal arts/social science degree, the Health and social services criminology major provides an excellent (substance abuse and rehabilitation background for post-baccalaureate studies. Our counseling) alums pursue graduate work in criminology or in related fields such as sociology, anthropology, Community work (child and social welfare agencies) political science, and psychology. In addition, the major provides a foundation for post-baccalaureate Federal, state, or local government work in law, public policy, social work, business, (urban planning & housing) and urban planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Analysis Course: Text
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Criminal Justice Planning and Management Series Volume 2 Criminal Justice Analysis Course: Text !ii ,,° "" 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ r~I k ~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~h ¸ • ~ ~! ' ~'~i~ ~ ~, • ~ • , 11~ T¸p ~ I~ H ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................... I INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 3 II Purpose and Approach ........................................... 3 II. Audience ............................ ........................... 3 Ill. Themes ......................................................... 4 IV. Value of Analysis ........... •................................... 5 V. Roadmap ....................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1. PROBLEM SPECIFICATIONI ...................................... 19 I. How Problems are Specified .............. ; ..................... 19 II. Summary........................................................ 36 CHAPTER 2. DATA SYNTHESIS.............................................. 41 I• Measurement Accuracy ................................. ' ......... 44 II. Assessing Hypotheses .......................................... 49 Ill. Data Sources .................................................. 56 IV. Planning the Data Collection Effort .......................... 100 CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTIVE METHODS................................. ...... 113 I • Measurement Level s ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Relationship Between Retributive and Restorative Justice
    Revisiting the Relationship between Retributive and Restorative Justice Kathleen Daly School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Mt Gravatt Campus Griffith University QLD 4111 +61 7 3875-5625 (of); 3875-5608 (fax) 3216-1630 (ho) [email protected] To appear in Restorative Justice: From Philosophy to Practice (forthcoming, 2000), edited by Heather Strang and John Braithwaite. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Revised paper presented at Restorative Justice and Civil Society Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, February 1999. December 1999 1 Revisiting the Relationship between Retributive and Restorative Justice by Kathleen Daly In this essay, I raise a complex and contentious question: what is the role of punishment in a restorative justice process? I raise the question to invite discussion and debate in the field, not to assert a clear and unequivocal answer. The term punishment evokes strong images and feelings in people; it has no singular meaning. This is especially the case when it is linked to a restorative justice process, that is, an informal legal process that includes lay and legal actors, which is partly, but not entirely state punishment. I have not worked out many technical features of the argument,1 but I am convinced that those interested in the idea of restorative justice need to grapple with the idea of punishment.2 I start with several caveats and definitions. I am working within the terms of what Cohen (1985: 251) calls "the liberal consensus". This means that I assume that there is individual autonomy (or personal responsibility) in committing crime and a moral legitimacy of criminal law. These assumptions can be easily challenged by critical legal scholars, who call attention to the injustices of criminal law and justice system practices as they are applied in unequal societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Science Research on Forensic Science: the Story Behind
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON FORENSIC SCIENCE: THE STORY BEHIND ONE OF NIJ’S NEWEST RESEARCH PORTFOLIOS BY KATHARINE BROWNING In 2005, NIJ began funding social science research on issues relating to forensic science, initiating an entirely new line of research. he last few decades have seen numerous exciting technological advances in the forensic sciences. But actually Tusing these new forensic technologies to catch and convict perpetrators and clear the innocent is much more complicated than it looks on TV. This is where social science comes in. Only through social science research — studying how human beings can and should use these new technologies — can we ensure that our nation’s criminal justice practitioners are maximizing the use of ever-evolving developments in the forensic sciences. A decade ago, NIJ began to study how new forensic technologies were actually being used in the investigation and prosecution of crime and how they could be used even more effectively. This article looks at the evolution of NIJ’s portfolio of social science research on forensic science and provides examples of some of the studies NIJ has funded along the way. We hope that this retrospective 2 Social Science Research on Forensic Science: The Story Behind One of NIJ’s Newest Research Portfolios — of how we got from there to here in just 10 • Are we getting more “justice” as a result of years — will inspire other innovative ideas as new advances in the forensic sciences? technological advancements are adopted in the field • Is forensic evidence being used
    [Show full text]