DOCSLIB.ORG

Wareham Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wareham Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Wareham Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan June 2020 Prepared for: Town of Wareham 54 Marion Road Wareham, MA 02571 Prepared by: Woods Hole Group A CLS Company 107 Waterhouse Road Bourne, MA 02532 USA (508) 540-8080 This document contains confidential information that is proprietary to the Woods Hole Group, Inc. Neither the entire document nor any of the information contained therein should be disclosed or reproduced in whole or in part, beyond the intended purpose of this submission without the express written consent of the Woods Hole Group, Inc. Woods Hole Group, Inc. • A CLS Company Table of Contents PURPOSE OF PLAN .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 THE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 PLAN DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 PREVIOUS FEDERAL/STATE DISASTERS ...................................................................... 1-6 2.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.2 GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 LAND USE .................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.6 TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................... 2-5 2.7 CRITICAL FACILITIES ................................................................................................... 2-5 2.8 HISTORICAL PROPERTIES ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.9 REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES .................................................................................... 2-7 3.1 FLOODING (COASTAL & INLAND) ............................................................................... 3-3 3.2 COASTAL EROSION .................................................................................................. 3-13 3.3 HURRICANES & TROPICAL STORMS ......................................................................... 3-17 3.4 SEVERE WINTER WEATHER (SNOW/BLIZZARD/ICE STORM/NOR’EASTER) ................. 3-24 3.5 WILDFIRE ................................................................................................................ 3-29 3.6 TORNADO ............................................................................................................... 3-32 3.7 DROUGHT ............................................................................................................... 3-35 3.8 EXTREME TEMPERATURE ........................................................................................ 3-39 3.9 EARTHQUAKE .......................................................................................................... 3-42 3.10 INVASIVE SPECIES ................................................................................................... 3-45 3.11 OTHER SEVERE WEATHER ........................................................................................ 3-46 3.12 DAM AND CULVERT FAILURE ................................................................................... 3-52 3.13 WATER QUALITY CONCERNS (ALGAL BLOOMS, RED TIDES) ...................................... 3-58 3.14 TSUNAMI ................................................................................................................ 3-62 3.15 SUMMARY OF HAZARDS ......................................................................................... 3-63 Report/Project Title i Date (Month and Year) Client 2002-000 See Proprietary Note on Title Page Woods Hole Group, Inc. • A CLS Company 4.1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 4-2 4.2 RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.3 VULNERABLE PROPERTIES AND CRITICAL FACILITIES ................................................ 4-26 4.4 VULNERABLE POPULATIONS .................................................................................... 4-27 5.1 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................... 5-2 5.2 EXISTING CAPABILITES .............................................................................................. 5-2 Town Plans and Policies ..................................................................................................... 5-2 Town Staff .......................................................................................................................... 5-3 Financial Capabilities ......................................................................................................... 5-3 Existing Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................ 5-4 Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) ......................................... 5-5 5.3 PROPOSED MITIGATION ............................................................................................ 5-5 Planning Process ................................................................................................................ 5-5 Proposed Mitigation Actions.............................................................................................. 5-6 6.1 PLAN MONITORING, EVALUATION AND UPDATES ..................................................... 6-2 6.2 INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION STRATEGIES .......................................................... 6-2 6.3 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................... 6-3 6.4 PLAN ADOPTION ....................................................................................................... 6-3 REFERENCES: ...................................................................................................................... R-1 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ii June 2020 Town of Wareham 2018-0014 See Proprietary Note on Title Page Virtually every type of weather has been and will be experienced within a coastal Massachusetts town. From freezing temperatures and blizzard conditions in the winter to heat and humidity in the summer, Wareham must plan for the worst. The old adage of “if you don’t like the weather, wait a minute” certainly applies. Introduction In addition to potentially severe weather, Wareham’s unique peninsular geography and its position at the upper extent of Buzzards Bay exposes the Town to potential wave energy and storm surges capable of causing coastal erosion, flooding, and property damage to multiple sections of Town. In total, Wareham has approximately 57 miles of marine and estuarine shoreline. Natural hazards of all kinds can result in injury, loss of life, damage to buildings and infrastructure, which can have significant adverse impacts on the Town’s economic, social and environmental resources. Through the development and implementation of this Mutli-Hazard Mitigation Plan, the 1 Town of Wareham is proactively trying to prepare for and mitigate potential impacts from the various natural hazards. Chapter Chapter Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-1 June 2020 Town of Wareham 2018-0014 See Proprietary Note on Title Page CHAPTER 1 Introduction PURPOSE OF PLAN The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines hazard mitigation as “any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from (natural) hazards”, such as floods, hurricanes, winter storms, tornadoes, earthquakes, etc. Hazard mitigation may include both structural measures, such as flood control structures, and nonstructural measures, such as regulations and bylaws, to prevent flooding. Local planning and mitigation efforts allow communities to reduce or eliminate the loss of life and property damage resulting from natural hazards. The Town of Wareham produced this Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan for the entire Town with the goal of providing sustained actions to reduce or eliminate risk to human life and property damage from a natural hazard event. Objectives of this plan are as follows: • Describe the planning process; • Identify relevant background information about the Town, including geography, What is a Hazard climate, land use, and infrastructure; Mitigation Plan? • Identify natural hazard risks and areas in town most likely to be impacted; Natural hazard mitigation • Complete a risk assessment to profile planning is the process of hazard events, inventory assets, and reducing or eliminating the loss estimate potential losses; of life and property damage • Identify existing disaster mitigation resulting from natural hazards measures already in place; such as floods, earthquakes, and • Develop proposed mitigation measures hurricanes through long-term and a mitigation strategy based on the strategies, including planning, risk assessment; and policy changes, programs, • Design a mechanism to keep the plan projects, and other activities. updated to reflect current conditions and establish a schedule
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President
    J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mr. Bellisle possesses more than 20 years of experience working on a variety of geotechnical, foundation, civil, and dam engineering projects. He has acted as principal-in-charge, project manager, and project engineer for assignments involving geotechnical design, site investigations, testing, instrumentation, and construction monitoring. His experience also includes over 500 Phase I inspections and Phase II design services for earthen and concrete dams. REGISTRATIONS AND Relevant project experience includes: CERTIFICATIONS His experience includes value engineering of alternate foundation systems, Professional Engineer – Massachusetts, ground improvement methodologies, and temporary construction support. Mr. Rhode Island, Bellisle has also developed environmental permit applications and presented at New Hampshire, New York public hearings in support of public and private projects. Dam Engineering PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS): Principal-in- American Society of Civil Charge/Project Manager for various stability analyses and reports to assess Engineers long-term performance of vegetated emergency spillways. Association of State Dam - Hop Brook Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway Safety Officials Evaluation - George H. Nichols Multipurpose Dam – Conceptual Design of an Armored Spillway EDUCATION - Lester G. Ross Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway University of Rhode Island: Evaluation M.S., Civil Engineering 2001 - Cold Harbor Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway B.S., Civil & Environmental Evaluation Engineering, 1992 - Delaney Complex Dams – Emergency Spillway Evaluation PUBLICATIONS AND Hobbs Pond Dam: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for the design PRESENTATIONS and development of construction documents of a new armored auxiliary spillway and new primary spillway to repair a filed embankment and Bellisle, J.M., Chopy, D, increase discharge capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning By-Laws
    ZONING BY-LAWS Town of WAREHAM Massachusetts Revised October , 2018 This page intentionally left blank 1 Town of WAREHAM Massachusetts TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 1: General Provisions 5 110 Title 5 120 Authority 5 130 Purpose 5 140 Applicability 5 150 Severability 5 Article 2: Zoning Districts 6 210 Classification of Districts 6 220 Zoning Map 7 230 Lots in Two Districts 8 Article 3: Use Regulations 9 310 Use Regulations 9 320 Table of Principal Use Regulations 9 330 Table of Accessory Use Regulations 13 340 Use Definitions 14 350 Multiple Principal Uses and Structures 20 360 Applicable Uses 20 370 Uses Prohibited in All Districts 20 380 Special Conditions Applicable to Uses in Certain Districts 21 390 Marijuana Facilities 22 Article 4: Overlay Districts 23 410 Overlay Districts Generally 23 420 Flood Plain District 23 430 Buttermilk Bay Overlay District 25 440 Groundwater Protection Overlay District 25 450 Business Development Overlay District 28 460 Tremont Nail Factory Redevelopment Overlay District 30 Article 5: Supplemental Regulations 32 510 Home Occupations 32 520 Temporary Habitation 32 530 Ungaraged Motor Vehicle 32 540 Wireless Communications Facilities 32 550 Adult Use Regulations 34 560 Earth Removal Activities 36 570 Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) 36 2 580 Special Permit for large tracts in the Conference Recreational District 41 590 Solar Energy Generation Facilities 45 Article 6: Density and Dimensional Regulations 50 610 General Requirements 50 620 Table of Dimensional Regulations 50 Article 7: Design Standards and
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review
    2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review WHITEPAPER Executive Summary The 2014 Atlantic hurricane season was a quiet season, closing with eight 2014 marks the named storms, six hurricanes, and two major hurricanes (Category 3 or longest period on stronger). record – nine Forecast groups predicted that the formation of El Niño and below consecutive years average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic Main – that no major Development Region (MDR)1 through the season would inhibit hurricanes made development in 2014, leading to a below average season. While 2014 landfall over the was indeed quiet, these predictions didn’t materialize. U.S. The scientific community has attributed the low activity in 2014 to a number of oceanic and atmospheric conditions, predominantly anomalously low Atlantic mid-level moisture, anomalously high tropical Atlantic subsidence (sinking air) in the Main Development Region (MDR), and strong wind shear across the Caribbean. Tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic basin was also influenced by below average activity in the 2014 West African monsoon season, which suppressed the development of African easterly winds. The year 2014 marks the longest period on record – nine consecutive years since Hurricane Wilma in 2005 – that no major hurricanes made landfall over the U.S., and also the ninth consecutive year that no hurricane made landfall over the coastline of Florida. The U.S. experienced only one landfalling hurricane in 2014, Hurricane Arthur. Arthur made landfall over the Outer Banks of North Carolina as a Category 2 hurricane on July 4, causing minor damage. While Mexico and Central America were impacted by two landfalling storms and the Caribbean by three, Bermuda suffered the most substantial damage due to landfalling storms in 2014.Hurricane Fay and Major Hurricane Gonzalo made landfall on the island within a week of each other, on October 12 and October 18, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Arthur
    Meteorological Mainstream: Hurricane Arthur Hurricane Arthur was an Independence Day spoiler for North Carolina merchants. It spun up off of the Florida coast as a Tropical Depression on June 30 and strengthened into a hurricane July 3 as moved northward, taking a bead on the North Carolina shore early on the morning of July 4. It was the earliest visit by a hurricane to the area since records began in 1851. The eye of “Arthur” crossing Pamlico Sound, North Carolina early on the morning of July 4 / NWS radar data. Hurricane Warnings had people running for high ground and leaving beaches deserted during a traditionally very busy…and profitable…summer weekend. The storm reached Category 2 intensity with 100-mph winds as it paralleled the coastline of the Tar-Heel State. There were trees and power lines downed and some roof and beach damage; Cape Lookout weather equipment measured the highest wind gust at 101 mph. However, the sustained 100-mph winds remained mostly offshore. Had Arthur’s track been just 40 miles farther west the story would have been much different, and for the worse, not only due to winds but because of a considerable storm surge. As it was, the surge maxed out at about four feet above normal. There was flooding, but it was far from catastrophic. Arthur turned northeastward and headed out to sea quickly on the morning of July 4, allowing for some of the Holiday weekend to be salvaged. Downed power lines and in some cases damaged roadways did hinder the flow of tourists but it was not a total loss for area businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 3 OF 5 PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 PRELIMINARY: APRIL 18, 2018 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV003D Version Number 2.3.3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 5 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 17 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 17 2.2 Floodways 34 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 35 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 35 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 35 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 35 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 37 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 38 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 39 SECTION 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • February 2017
    Southernmost Weather Reporter National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Key West, FL Southernmost Weather Reporter National Weather Service ~ Key West, FL Welcome to 2017 Winter Report F E B 2 0 1 7 Inside this Report: e would like to welcome you to the second edition of the “Southernmost Weather Reporter” from the Florida Keys National Weather Service Welcome 1 (NWS). In this newsletter you will find information about some of the Hurricane Tabletop W 2 most important office events that have occurred since our first edition was released Exercise in May 2016. The tropics were active in 2016, with Tropical Depression #9 (the storm Skywarn Training 3 that would eventually become Hurricane Hermine) forming over the Florida Keys DSS aboard NOAA coastal waters in late August, and Hurricane Matthew threatening the Keys in early 4-5 Ship Nancy Foster October before it eventually impacted the east coast of Florida and the Carolinas. We were “all hands on deck” for these two events, conducting numerous briefings, NWS Ambassador 6 working closely with our core Federal, state, and local partners, and launching Program special upper air releases every six hours. Our office participated in what was a first Aviation Workshop 6 for the NWS: a long-term deployment on board a NOAA research vessel to provide decision support. Meteorologists Chip Kasper and Chris Rothwell each joined the Weather Kiosk 7 science team aboard the NOAA Ship Nancy Foster for an expedition in the coastal US Coast Guard Cutter 8 waters of the Florida Keys in August. The NOAA-led research team conducted scuba Visits operations and undertook a variety of research tasks, collecting data necessary to 2016 Hurricane Sea- 9 inform management decisions within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Marion, Massachusetts 2016 Annual Report
    ! ! "#$%!#&!'()*#%+!'(,,(-./,011,! ! ! ! ! 2345! 6%%/(7!809#)1! ! Town of Marion Municipal Telephone Directory Emergency Numbers Ambulance - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only Fire Dept. - 748-1177 Police Dept. - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only 911 - Emergency Only Office of Emergency Management - 748-1212 911- Emergency Only Town House - 748-3500 Two Spring Street Board of Appeals – 748-3560 Harbormaster office – 748-3515 Board of Assessors – 748-3518 Planning Board – 748-3517 Board of Health – 748-3530 Recreation Department – 774-217-8355 Board of Selectmen -748-3520 Registrars of Voters – 748-3526 Building Department – 748-3516 Town Accountant – 748-3523 Conservation Commission – 748-3560 Town Administrator – 748-3520 Council on Aging – 748-357 0 Town Clerk – 748-3502 Facilities Manager – 748-3089 Town Planner – 748-3513 Fire Inspections – 748-3510 Treasurer/Collector – 748-3505 Veteran’s Services – 758-4100, Ext. 212 Department of Public Works - 50 Benson Brook Road - 748-3540 Elizabeth Taber Library - 748-1252 Harbormaster/Shellfish Officer - 748-3535 Superintendent of Schools - 758-2772 Sippican School - 748-0100 Old Rochester Regional Junior High School - 758-4928 Old Rochester Regional High School - 758-3745 Front cover photo by Michelle Smith One Hundred Sixty Second Annual Report of the Town Officers of Marion For the Year Ending December 31st 2016 —Table of Contents— In Memoriam . 4 Elected Town Officials. 6 Appointed Town Officials & Staff . 7 General Government Reports Board of Selectmen/Water & Sewer Commissioners . 16 Board of Assessors . 18 Planning Board . 20 Department of Public Works. 22 Water Committee . 26 Building Commissioner . 28 Zoning Board of Appeals . 30 Facilities Manager . 31 Town House Building Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity Analysis of Hurricane Arthur (2014) Storm Surge Forecasts to WRF Physics Parameterizations and Model Configurations
    OCTOBER 2017 Z H A N G E T A L . 1745 Sensitivity Analysis of Hurricane Arthur (2014) Storm Surge Forecasts to WRF Physics Parameterizations and Model Configurations FAN ZHANG AND MING LI Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland ANDREW C. ROSS Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania SERENA BLYTH LEE Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia DA-LIN ZHANG Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland (Manuscript received 13 December 2016, in final form 17 July 2017) ABSTRACT Through a case study of Hurricane Arthur (2014), the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model and the Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM) are used to investigate the sensitivity of storm surge forecasts to physics parameterizations and configurations of the initial and boundary conditions in WRF. The turbulence closure scheme in the planetary boundary layer affects the prediction of the storm intensity: the local closure scheme produces lower equivalent potential temperature than the nonlocal closure schemes, leading to significant reductions in the maximum surface wind speed and surge heights. On the other hand, higher-class cloud microphysics schemes overpredict the wind speed, resulting in large overpredictions of storm surge at some coastal locations. Without cumulus parameterization in the outermost domain, both the wind speed and storm surge are grossly underpredicted as a result of large precipitation decreases in the storm center. None of the choices for the WRF physics parameterization schemes significantly affect the prediction of Arthur’s track.
    [Show full text]
  • FES Presentation Hurricane Michael FES Annual Meeting 2019 Mark Fuller, P.E
    FES Presentation Hurricane Michael FES Annual Meeting 2019 Mark Fuller, P.E. CFM City of Tallahassee Hurricane Michael October 7-11, 2018 x-Albany, GA Mexico Beach, FL- x x- Tallahassee, FL Mexico Beach & Blountstown High School- Florida Direct Hit- Hurricane Michael 2018 October 7-11 2018 Michael was a category 5 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) that Hurricane Michael made a catastrophic landfall near Mexico Beach and Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, producing devastating winds and storm surge near the coast, and rain and wind inland. It was directly responsible for 16 deaths and about $25 billion in damage in the United States. Before hitting the United States, the cyclone brought hurricane-force winds to the western tip of Cuba when it was a category 2 hurricane. X- Albany, Ga. Mexico Beach-x x- Tallahassee 10/ 8 /1 8 10:30 a.m. Monday 1. Briefings daily 10:30a and 4:00p. 2. 10:30am Morning Briefing - at 11am the storm officially became Hurricane Michael in the southern Gulf of Mexico region. They expect it to hit landfall late 10/10/18 Wednesday morning or Wednesday night. Late Tuesday 10/9/18 evening we may feel winds up to Tropical Storm level. The storm is currently headed North to Northwest with the expectation that it will turn to the Northeast. The potential is that Hurricane Michael could turn into a category 3 which means 120 mph winds. The next update call is 4:30p. 3. 4:30p Afternoon Briefing- storm strengthening, current CAT 1 (Sustained winds 74mph) can go CAT 3 (120 mph winds), expected land fall on panhandle, Tues.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
    Martha’s Vineyard Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2018 October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2018 Prepared by The Martha's Vineyard Commission in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Massachusetts Department of Transportation and the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority under contract number 56241 "The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation." Participants Martha's Vineyard Committee of Signatories Richard Davey Secretary of Transportation, MassDOT Francis DePaola Highway Administrator, MassDOT Fred Hancock Chairman, Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC) Alice Butler Chairman, Vineyard Transit Authority Martha's Vineyard Joint Transportation Committee Voting Members Adam Wilson Town of Aquinnah Daniel Greenbaum Town of Chilmark Stuart Fuller Town of Edgartown Richard Combra, Jr. Town of Oak Bluffs Glenn Mauk Town of Tisbury Jennifer Rand Town of West Tisbury Leon Brathwaite County of Dukes County Ex-Officio Members (Non-Voting) Mark London Martha’s Vineyard Commission Angela Grant Vineyard Transit Authority Sheri Warrington MassDOT Bryan Pounds MassDOT Pamela
    [Show full text]