INSIDE Subscribe Today! [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Philanthropic Landscape
SNAPSHOT OF TODAY’S PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE A Guide to Philanthropy in the U.S. 8th Edition, 2019 Letter// INTRODUCTION: from the Reflections Chairman on the Latest Data In 2018, charitable giving in the United States reached a record-breaking $427 billion reported in contributions from individuals, companies, foundations, and charitable bequests. Despite this extraordinary number, there are some underlying trends which raise concerns about the participation of American households in charitable giving. Annual surveys, such as the Philanthropy Panel Study by the IUPUI Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, indicate that the percentage of American households that report making charitable gifts has declined. The most significant dip was during the financial crisis in 2009 with an estimated 14 million fewer U.S. households reporting charitable gifts. Evidence of this trend can be seen in decreasing support in the religious sector, declining alumni participation rates at many educational institutions, and lower engagement in several leading corporate matching gift programs. In contrast, the philanthropic activity of American households with an income of $200,000 or more is growing in significance as evidenced by large publicly reported charitable gifts, institutional fundraising success stories, and an influx of personal assets into donor-advised funds. Those who do give are giving considerably more. There are more than one million registered nonprofit organizations in the United States. How these institutions respond to these trends will affect their revenue streams well into the future. With this in mind, we have endeavored to consolidate many insightful reports on giving and volunteering into this Snapshot of Today’s Philanthropic Landscape. -
The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC
The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC Financing and Independent Expenditures Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut [email protected] Presented at the Meeting of the Campaign Finance Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017 (revised June 2017). 1 Exe cutive Summa ry Super PACs have grown in number, wealth, and influence since the Supreme Court laid the foundation for their formation in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the decisions reached by other courts and the FEC clarified the boundaries of their political participation. Their objectives and activities also have evolved. Super PACs are not nearly as monolithic as they have been portrayed by the media. While it is inaccurate to characterize them as representative of American society, it is important to recognize that they vary in wealth, mission, structure, affiliation, political perspective, financial transparency, and how and where they participate in political campaigns. Organizational characteristics influence super PAC financing, including the sums they raise. Organizational characteristics also affect super PAC independent expenditures, including the amounts spent, the elections in which they are made, the candidates targeted, and the tone of the messages delivered. The super PAC community is not static. It is likely to continue to evolve in response to legal challenges; regulatory decisions; the objectives of those who create, administer, and finance them; and changes in the broader political environment. 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Data and Methods 4 III. Emergence and Development 7 IV. Organizational Characteristics 11 A. Finances 11 B. Mission 14 C. Affiliation 17 D. Financial Transparency 19 E. -
And Type in Recipient's Full Name
ATP MEDIA INFORMATION 2021 ATP TOUR SEASON AT A GLANCE • Most Singles Titles: 4, Novak Djokovic, Daniil Medvedev, Casper Ruud, Alexander Zverev • Most Doubles Titles: 9, Nikola Mektic, Mate Pavic • Youngest Champion: Carlos Alcaraz (18), Umag • Oldest Champion: John Isner (36), Atlanta • Lowest-ranked Winner: Juan Manuel Cerundolo (No. 335), Cordoba • First-time Champion (8 times): Daniel Evans (Melbourne-2), Juan Manuel Cerundolo (Cordoba), Alexei Popyrin (Singapore), Aslan Karatsev (Dubai), Sebastian Korda (Parma), Cameron Norrie (Los Cabos), Carlos Alcaraz (Umag), Ilya Ivashka (Winston-Salem) • Best Result by a Qualifier: Champion – Juan Manuel Cerundolo (Cordoba) • Best Result by a Lucky Loser: Semi-finalist - Taro Daniel (Belgrade-1); Soonwoo Kwon, Max Purcell (Eastbourne) • Most Wins: 50 (50-15) – Stefanos Tsitsipas • Most Matches Played: 65 (50-15) – Stefanos Tsitsipas • Most Aces in Best-of-3 Match: 36, John Isner (d. Wolf, Atlanta 1R; Sam Querrey (l. Gojowczyk, Atlanta 1R) • Most Aces in Best-of-5 Match: 49, Kevin Anderson (d. Vesely, US Open 1R) • Longest Winning Streak: 22, Novak Djokovic • Longest Best-of-3 Match: 3:38 (Nadal d. Tsitsipas 64 67(6) 75, Barcelona Final) • Longest Best-of-5 Match: 5:02 (Andujar d. Herbert 76(7) 46 76(7) 57 86, Wimbledon 1R) • Shortest (completed) Match: 46 minutes (Davidovich Fokina d. P. Tsitsipas 60 62, Marseille 1R) • Longest Singles Tiebreak: 15-13 (Seppi d. Fucsovics 26 75 64 26 76(13), US Open 1R; Tsitsipas d. Humbert 63 67(13) 61, Toronto 2R) • Longest Doubles Match Tiebreak: 18-16 (Mektic/Pavic -
Election Spending 2016: Just Three Interests Dominate, Shadow Parties Continue to Rise
Election Spending 2016: Just Three Interests Dominate, Shadow Parties Continue to Rise Ian Vandewalker *Research provided by Alexis Farmer Outside spending — expenditures by groups other than candidates themselves — is pouring into the races that will determine control of the U.S. Senate. As part of our series on money in key Senate races, the Brennan Center has examined the outside spending in 10 close contests.1 New data will become available in the next week that will allow us to paint a full picture of spending trends in 2016’s most competitive Senate races. In the meantime, our preliminary analysis reveals two important trends: The courts’ deregulation of outside money is not allowing a wider array of voices to fund elections. On the contrary, just a handful of partisan and ideological interests with vast resources, especially the major parties, are using the looser rules to increasingly monopolize election funding. The parties are shifting their resources outside the official committees, which raise money subject to contribution limits and required disclosure of donors, to super PACs and nonprofits controlled by party operatives but able to take unlimited and often secret donations. Spending Is Dominated by Just Three Interests More than half of the outside spending in key Senate races comes from just three interests: the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, and the political network founded by the industrialist Koch brothers. Counting expenditures from FEC data, media reports, and press releases, we found $321 million spent by entities other than the candidates in the 10 closest Senate races (Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). -
Sport Scoreboard
Page 30 Sport Tuesday, January 5, 2016 SPORT SCOREBOARD Atlanta 8 8 0 .500 339 345 Dav. Johnson, ARI 13 8 4 1 78 Total (7 wkts; 86.2 overs) ......................................248 New Orleans 7 9 0 .438 408 476 A. Peterson, MIN 11 11 0 0 66 J E Taylor and J A Warrican still to bat TENNIS BERMUDA Tampa Bay 6 10 0 .375 342 417 J. Reed, WAS 11 0 11 0 66 Fall of wickets: 1-13, 2-104, 3-115, 4-131, 5-158, HOPMAN CUP North Austin, STL 10 4 5 1 60 6-159, 7-246 Perth, Australia W L T Pct PF PA Ginn Jr., CAR 10 0 10 0 60 Bowling: Hazlewood 15.2-5-37-1; Pattinson 16-3-67-2; y-Minnesota 11 5 0 .688 365 302 Gurley, STL 10 10 0 0 60 Lyon 35-12-78-2; Marsh 4-1-15-0; O’Keefe 16-5-45-1. Group A FOOTBALL Ukraine 2 United States 1 x-Green Bay 10 6 0 .625 368 323 C. Newton, CAR 10 10 0 0 60 Australia: D A Warner, J A Burns, U T Khawaja, *S Elina Svitolina, Ukraine, bt Vicky Duval, United States, Detroit 7 9 0 .438 358 400 P D Smith, A C Voges, M R Marsh, †P M Nevill, S N FIRST DIVISION 6-4, 6-1 Chicago 6 10 0 .375 335 397 J O’Keefe, J L Pattinson, J R Hazlewood, N M Lyon. Today’s game Alexandr Dolgopolov, Ukraine, bt Jack Sock, United West Umpires: C B Gaffney (New Zealand) and I J Gould BAA v Young Men’s Social Club, 7pm States, 6-4, 6-2 W L T Pct PF PA (England). -
What Is Addiction?
Methadone and Buprenorphine Maintenance: Effective Treatments for Opiate Addiction Mary Jeanne Kreek, M.D. Patrick E. and Beatrice M. Haggerty Professor Head of Laboratory The Laboratory of the Biology of Addictive Diseases The Rockefeller University Senior Physician The Rockefeller University Hospital June 11, 2019 International Conference on Opioids Boston, MA funded primarily by NIH-NIDA, NIH-NCRR and the Adelson Medical Research Foundation What is Addiction? Compulsive drug seeking behavior and drug self-administration, without regard to negative consequences to self or others. (adapted from WHO) “drug” = nicotine, alcohol – legal drugs prescription opiates, marijuana (cannabis) – medicines (?) heroin, cocaine – illegal drugs 2019 Natural History of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Addictions relapse to addiction without pharmacotherapy 90% - opiate; Primary Possible Utility of Vaccines Medications Useful 60% - cocaine, alcohol Prevention and Selected Medications and Needed Initial Sporadic Regular Addiction Early Protracted Self-Administration Intermittent Use Withdrawal Abstinence of Drug of Abuse Use (abstinence) Progression sustain abstinence with no specific medications ADDICTION: Compulsive drug seeking behavior 10% - opiate; and drug self-administration, without regard to 40% - cocaine, alcohol negative consequences to self or others (adapted from WHO). Adapted from Kreek et al., Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1:710, 2002; 2019 1 Prevalence of Specific Drug Abuse and Vulnerability to Develop Addictions – 2019 National Household Survey -
Q1. Name the Player Who Has Lifted the Australian Open 2021 Tennis Title in Men's Category
Bankersadda.com Current Affairs Quiz for IBPS Mains 2020 Adda247.com Quiz Date: 23rd February 2021 Q1. Name the player who has lifted the Australian Open 2021 Tennis title in Men's category. (a) Daniil Medvedev (b) Novak Djokovic (c) Aslan Karatsev (d) Federico Gaio (e) Roger Federer Q2. The Government of India has inked pact with which country to set up a Centre of Excellence on Hydrogen? (a) Maldives (b) United States (c) Australia (d) Norway (e) Sweden Q3. What is the GDP growth projection of India in the fiscal 2021-22, as per S&P Global Ratings? (a) 11% (b) 12% (c) 10% (d) 9% (e) 13% Q4. Which state has recently sanctioned Rs. 9 crore to build „smart anganwadis‟? (a) Andhra Pradesh (b) Tamil nadu (c) Karnataka (d) Telangana (e) Kerala Q5. Which player has bagged the women‟s single title of the Australian Open 2021? (a) Karolína Muchová (b) Jennifer Brady (c) Naomi Osaka (d) Ashleigh Barty (e) Serena Williams Q6. The foundation stone of the first ever „Skill University of the Eastern India‟ has been laid in which state? (a) West Bengal (b) Assam For any Banking/Insurance exam Assistance, Give a Missed call @ 01141183264 Bankersadda.com Current Affairs Quiz for IBPS Mains 2020 Adda247.com (c) Jharkhand (d) Sikkim (e) Nagaland Q7. The Atal Paryavaran Bhavan has recently been inaugurated in which place by Union Minister Prakash Javadekar? (a) Jammu & Kashmir (b) Assam (c) Lakshadweep (d) Bihar (e) Ladakh Q8. When is the International Mother Language Day (IMLD) observed? (a) 22 February (b) 21 February (c) 20 February (d) 19 February (e) 23 February Q9. -
ATP Challenger Tour by the Numbers
ATP MEDIA INFORMATION Updated: 20 September 2021 2021 ATP CHALLENGER BY THE NUMBERS Match Wins Leaders W-L Titles 1) Benjamin Bonzi FRA 49-11 6 2) Tomas Martin Etcheverry ARG 38-13 2 3) Zdenek Kolar CZE 29-18 3 4) Holger Rune DEN 28-7 3 5) Kacper Zuk POL 26-11 1 Nicolas Jarry CHI 26-12 1 7) Sebastian Baez ARG 25-5 3 Altug Celikbilek TUR 25-10 2 Juan Manuel Cerundolo ARG 25-10 3 Tomas Barrios Vera CHI 25-11 1 11) Jenson Brooksby USA 23-3 3 Gastao Elias POR 23-12 1 Win Percentage Leaders W-L Pct. Titles 1) Jenson Brooksby USA 23-3 88.5 3 2) Sebastian Baez ARG 25-5 83.3 3 3) Benjamin Bonzi FRA 49-11 81.7 6 4) Holger Rune DEN 28-7 80.0 3 5) Zizou Bergs BEL 19-6 76.0 3 6) Federico Coria ARG 18-6 75.0 1 7) Tomas Martin Etcheverry ARG 38-13 74.5 2 8) Arthur Rinderknech FRA 18-7 72.0 1 Botic van de Zandschulp NED 18-7 72.0 0 *Minimum 20 matches played* Singles Title Leaders ----- By Surface ----- Player Total Clay Grass Hard Carpet Benjamin Bonzi FRA 6 1 5 Sebastian Baez ARG 3 3 Zizou Bergs BEL 3 1 2 Jenson Brooksby USA 3 1 2 Juan Manuel Cerundolo ARG 3 3 Tallon Griekspoor NED 3 3 Zdenek Kolar CZE 3 3 Holger Rune DEN 3 3 Franco Agamenone ITA 2 2 Daniel Altmaier GER 2 2 Altug Celikbilek TUR 2 2 Mitchell Krueger USA 2 2 Tomas Martin Etcheverry ARG 2 2 Mats Moraing GER 2 2 Carlos Taberner ESP 2 2 Bernabe Zapata Miralles ESP 2 2 53 tied with 1 title each Winners by Age: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 0 0 6 7 8 4 7 10 13 13 4 3 7 5 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 Youngest Final: Juan Manuel Cerundolo (19) d. -
Eli Zborowski Dr
Vol. 33-No.1 ISSN 0892-1571 September/October 2006-Elul/Tishrei 5767 ELI ZBOROWSKI DR. MIRIAM & SHELDON G. ADELSON LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD YAD VASHEM REMEMBRANCE AWARD ne of Eli Zborowski’s most cherished childhood memories is sitting with his r. Miriam Adelson was born and raised in Israel with the shadow of the father, Moshe, in the comfort of their Zarki home on Shabbat afternoon Holocaust ever-present in her life. Her parents, the Ochshorns, fled Poland Oreading and exploring the pearls of wisdom found in Pirkei Avot, The Ethics Djust prior to the war. But significant portions of their families, who chose to of the Fathers. That warm and nurturing weekly interlude came to an abrupt halt in stay, perished during the Shoah. As Miriam so poignantly reveals, “I am the daugh- 1942 when the deportations to the death camps began. Soon after, Moshe ter of a mother who, when she was a teen, lost almost her entire family. One day Zborowski was murdered by the Poles. This thrust Eli, the oldest son, into his first everyone disappeared. I grew up feeling my mother’s pain.” Miriam recalls that fol- of many lifelong leadership roles. During the lowing the war, there was suddenly an influx of cousins in her life whom she had pre- war he was a member of the Jewish Fighters viously not known. Responding to the needs of young family members who lost their Organization, serving as a liaison between parents, the Ochshorns ghettos and non-Jewish partisan units. The brought them from family, his mother, sister, younger brother and Europe and helped himself survived the war in hiding with the help them to become estab- of righteous Poles. -
The Wealth Elasticity of Political Contributions by the Forbes 400 Adam Bonica * Howard Rosenthal** Stanford University New York University
The Wealth Elasticity of Political Contributions by the Forbes 400 Adam Bonica * Howard Rosenthal** Stanford University New York University Abstract: Inequality in campaign contributions in the American plutocracy has grown hand in hand with the growth in economic inequality. We report on the campaign contributions of the Forbes 400 wealthiest individuals from 1983 to 2012. We find that the wealth elasticity of individual contributions is around 1.0 without statistical controls but remains around 0.6 even with fixed effects for individuals and election cycles. The results suggest that the inequality in campaign contributions is largely driven by the increase in economic inequality. The sensitivity of contributions to individual wealth mainly benefits Republicans. In contrast, turnover in membership in the 400 has favored the Democrats. * Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 307 Encina Hall West, Stanford, CA 94305, [email protected]. ** Wilf Family Department of Politics, New York University, 2nd Floor, 19 W. 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, [email protected] 0 The Forbes 400 series of the wealth of the 400 wealthiest Americans, published annually since 1982, allows us to match wealth with individual campaign contributions in federal elections. The direct empirical motivation of the paper is to examine whether the contributions of the super wealthy correlate with variations in their individual wealth. We have constructed a (unbalanced) panel of wealth and contributions data for 1982- 2012. In a larger context, however, it is important to ask how political inequality, as measured by inequality in campaign contributions, relates to inequality in wealth. Individual contributions are important and have been larger, when aggregated, then contributions by PACs (political action committees) and other organizations (Bonica et al., 2013). -
What You Do Matters
what you do matters 2008–09 ANNUAL REPORT 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2008–09 WHAT YOU DO MATTERS 3 FRONT COVER ESTELLE LAUGHLIN HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR AND MUSEUM VOLUNTEER what they do Dear friends—this past November, however impressive our far-reaching 40-foot-high portraits of Estelle impact, we must constantly challenge Laughlin and other Museum survivor ourselves to do more. In a century volunteers were projected one by one already threatened by an alarming onto the exterior of our building. rise in hatred and antisemitism as The symbolism was stunning as each well as genocide, there are simply illuminated the night. Estelle had just no time-outs. turned ten when Germany invaded Our global institution is on the Poland. Over the next four years, she front lines confronting these issues managed to survive the Warsaw ghetto, thanks to your generosity and an the Majdanek death camp, and two extraordinary constellation of other slave labor camps. With dreams still partners equally passionate in our haunted by these memories, Estelle cause. On the pages that follow you shares her story with audiences here will meet some of them. While we and across the country in order to, as cannot eradicate hatred and evil, she says, “keep truth alive and visible.” together we remain unrelenting in In telling their stories, Holocaust our commitment to remember and to survivors put the horror of the genocide teach the lessons of the Holocaust— of Europe’s Jews into a profoundly not just to impart the truth of history’s personal context. They move us beyond greatest crime but to ignite the personal the monolithic event and unfathomable sense of responsibility that stands at numbers to the anguish of each the heart of strong, just societies. -
Australian Open Aslan Karatsev
Australian Open Sunday, 14 February 2021 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Aslan Karatsev Press Conference Q. You've achieved a few firsts when you're looking A. KARATSEV/F. Auger-Aliassime at the stats, things like first qualifier to reach the quarterfinals on debut since 1996. There's a whole 3-6, 1-6, 6-3, 6-3, 6-4 lot of different things that you've achieved going from a career high ranking of 114. You're going to be THE MODERATOR: Questions, please. at this point in the low 60s. Do you think about those sorts of things? Do they matter to you? Q. What were you telling yourself when you were two sets to love down? ASLAN KARATSEV: You told me just now that I broke some records. Of course it's a good feeling, but I try to ASLAN KARATSEV: Yeah, it was a big moment. I didn't more focusing on the tournament, on the matches, and feel my game from the beginning. It was tough to really then everything what happened behind. It's good. It's a serve, and he also broke me down from the beginning, good feeling, yeah. so already I was down in the set, and I just found the rhythm in the third set. I said, Okay, I would keep playing Q. If Daniil and Andrey reach the quarters, it'll be the and go a bit far to the return and make him play more first time in the Open era that three Russians, men, balls, and yeah, I think that was the right strategy.