DOCSLIB.ORG

Elections to the European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elections to the European Parliament RESEARCH PAPER 99/64 Elections to the European 21 JUNE 1999 Parliament – June 1999 This paper presents a summary of the results of the June 1999 elections to the European Parliament. The main analysis concentrates on voting in the UK. This includes data at regional level and details of the votes cast in areas covered by Westminster constituencies in Great Britain. For the European Union as a whole, details of turnout and elected MEPs are also presented. A summary of previous elections can be found in Research Paper 99/57 European Parliament Elections - 1979 to 1994. Bryn Morgan & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 99/49 The Northern Ireland (Location of Victims' Remains) Bill 07.05.99 [Bill 92 of 1998-99] 99/50 Scottish Parliament Elections: 6 May 1999 11.05.99 99/51 Welsh Assembly Elections: 6 May 1999 12.05.99 99/52 The local elections of 6 May 1999 17.05.99 99/53 Unemployment by Constituency - April 1999 19.05.99 99/54 Institutional Reform in the European Union 20.05.99 99/55 Wind Power 26.05.99 99/56 Homicide Statistics 27.05.99 99/57 European Parliament Elections - 1979 to 1994 02.06.99 99/58 The Pollution Prevention and Control Bill [HL] [Bill 107 of 1998-99] 03.06.99 99/59 Buses 08.06.99 99/60 Hospital waiting lists and waiting times 14.06.99 99/61 Freedom of Information - The Continuing Debate 16.06.99 99/62 Unemployment by Constituency - May 1999 16.06.99 99/63 By-elections since the 1997 general election 17.06.99 Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Users of the printed version of these papers will find a pre-addressed response form at the end of the text. ISSN 1368-8456 Summary of main points Elections to the European Parliament were held on 10 June 1999 in the UK. In Great Britain, the Conservatives won 36 of the 81 seats, with Labour winning 29. Plaid Cymru, the Green Party and the UK Independence Party gained their first ever MEPs. In Northern Ireland, the DUP gained the most number of first preference votes. The DUP, SDLP and UUP shared the three seats in Northern Ireland. Turnout in Great Britain was around 23%, with around 57% voting in Northern Ireland. Turnout in the UK was lower than in any other EU country and than in any previous election to the European Parliament. Definitions: Turnout – Valid votes as a percentage of the electorate as given by returning officers or in ONS Electoral Statistics 1999 “Round” – The stage of the count in which seats are allocated to parties successively, using the d’Hondt quota Useful internet sites http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/epelections/index.htm – Home Office European Elections site http://www1.europarl.eu.int/uk/index.html – European Parliament Office in the UK http://www.europarl.eu.int/ - main European Parliament site, includes a listing of MEPs by party and country http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/19990001.htm – Full text of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 1999 http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991214.htm –Full text of The European Parliamentary Elections Regulations 1999 SI 1999/1214 [This 1st reprint includes figures for rejected ballot papers and a revised electorate for Salisbury constituency and the South West Region] CONTENTS I Introduction 7 II Summary results 7 III Tables 11 National Table 1 – Votes cast and seats won by party in Great Britain & Northern Ireland 11 Regional Table 2 – Votes cast, share of votes and seats won by party by electoral region 12 Table 3 – Turnout by region 13 Table 4 – Seats awarded by party by region and round 14 Table 5 – Changes in share of vote by region since 1997 General Election and 1994 European Elections 15 Table 6 – Change in European Parliamentary seats won by region 16 Westminster constituencies Table 7 – Highest and lowest shares of vote by major party and constituency 17 Table 8 – Highest and lowest turnouts by constituency 18 Table 9 – Notional outcome of a General Election on the basis of European Election results 19 Table 10 – Highest and lowest changes in share of vote by major party by constituency compared with 1997 General Election 20 Table 11 – Votes cast by party by constituency 21 Table 12 – Share of vote by party by constituency and turnout 35 Table 13 – Changes in share of the vote by party and constituency 49 Europe-wide Table 14 – Voter turnout across the EU (1979 to 1999) 63 Table 15 – MEPs by political group before and after June 1999 elections 64 Appendix 1 - List of UK MEPs 66 RESEARCH PAPER 99/64 I Introduction Elections took place for the European Parliament throughout the EU between 10 and 13 June 1999. This paper sets out results of these elections, largely for the UK, but also provides additional material on the results throughout the EU. It provides an early statistical digest of the results rather than a discussion or analysis of them. The June 1999 elections were the first national elections in Great Britain to use a form of proportional representation. This involved aggregating votes in Great Britain for regions to determine the number of MEPs for each party using the d’Hondt quota system. (Northern Ireland retained its system of electing its three MEPs by Single Transferable Vote.) The regional aggregates in GB were compiled from returns made for Westminster constituency areas by local returning offices. The voting figures in this paper for Westminster constituencies have been provided by regional returning officers and these are set out in full in Table 11. II Summary results The following table compares the number of UK European Parliament seats by party won in 1994 and 1997. These are compared with two estimates of what would have happened if the current PR system had been used in 1994 and if a first-past-the-post (FPTP) constituency-based system had continued to be used in 1999. In both cases the actual votes cast have been used for these calculations with no allowance for changes in voting behaviour that might occur under different electoral systems. GB MEPs under alternative voting systems – 1994 & 1999 Party 1994 Actual 1994 on current 1999 Actual 1999 on FPTP system (estimated) (estimated) Labour62432930 Conservative 18 26 36 49 Liberal Democrats 2 11 10 - SNP2323 PC - 1 2 2 UKIP - - 3 - Green - - 2 - Index of proportionality# 70 89 86 68 (GB) # This index is commonly used as a simple way of comparing relative proportionality of electoral systems. It is calculated as the sum of the differences between the proportion of seats and votes, divided by 2 and subtracted from 100. A system that yields the same proportion of seats as votes would score 100. The further away from 100 the less proportional the result. The number of ballot papers rejected in the count was 24,867 in Great Britain and 8,764 in Northern Ireland. In the 1994 European Parliament elections 32,316 had been rejected in Great Britain and 9,234 in Northern Ireland. In the 1997 General Election the 7 RESEARCH PAPER 99/64 equivalent totals were 90,288 for GB and 3,120 for Northern Ireland. As a proportion of the total poll, the rate of rejected papers was slightly less for GB in 1999, 25 per 10,000 total papers, than in the 1997 General Election, 30 per 10,000, and marginally higher than in 1994, 21 per 10,000. The 1999 European Election votes by party were made available for Westminster constituencies, it is therefore possible to compare the number of Westminster seats that would have been won in Great Britain had voting in a General Election followed exactly the same pattern. These are shown, together with the 1997 General Election results below: House of Commons seats by party - UK 1997 General Notional based on Election 1999 Euro-election Labour 418 261 Conservative 165 352 Liberal Democrat 46 3 SNP 6 15 PC 4 10 Other (inc. N Ireland) 20 18 1997 General Election Notional 1999 result 450 418 400 352 350 300 261 250 200 165 150 100 46 43 50 30 3 0 Labour Cons Lib Dem Other Labour Cons Lib Dem Other 1997 Overall, 208 seats would have changed hands compared with the General Election of 1997. The Conservative Party would have gained a total of 159, including 144 from Labour, with no losses. Gained by: Gained from: Conservative Labour LibDem PC SNP Total Conservative Labour 144 2 6 7 159 LibDem 40 1 4 45 PC SNP 2 2 Other 1 1 2 Total18722611208 8 RESEARCH PAPER 99/64 GB Parliamentary seats changing hands on the basis of 1999 European Election results compared with 1997 General Election Conservative gains from Labour (144) Amber Valley Enfield, Southgate Preseli Pembrokeshire Ayr Erewash Pudsey Barrow & Furness Exeter Putney Batley & Spen Falmouth & Camborne Reading East Battersea Finchley & Golders Green Reading West Bexleyheath & Crayford Forest of Dean Redditch Birmingham, Edgbaston Gedling Romford Birmingham, Hall Green Gillingham Rossendale & Darwen Blackpool N & Fleetwood Gloucester Rugby & Kenilworth Bolton North East Gravesham Scarborough & Whitby Bolton West Great Yarmouth Selby Bradford North Halesowen & Rowley Regis Sherwood Bradford South Halifax Shipley Bradford West Hammersmith & Fulham Shrewsbury & Atcham Braintree Harrow West Sittingbourne & Sheppey Brigg &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (515Kb)
    European Community No. 26/1984 July 10, 1984 Contact: Ella Krucoff (202) 862-9540 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: 1984 ELECTION RESULTS :The newly elected European Parliament - the second to be chosen directly by European voters -- began its five-year term last month with an inaugural session in Strasbourg~ France. The Parliament elected Pierre Pflimlin, a French Christian Democrat, as its new president. Pflimlin, a parliamentarian since 1979, is a former Prime Minister of France and ex-mayor of Strasbourg. Be succeeds Pieter Dankert, a Dutch Socialist, who came in second in the presidential vote this time around. The new assembly quickly exercised one of its major powers -- final say over the European Community budget -- by blocking payment of a L983 budget rebate to the United Kingdom. The rebate had been approved by Community leaders as part of an overall plan to resolve the E.C.'s financial problems. The Parliament froze the rebate after the U.K. opposed a plan for covering a 1984 budget shortfall during a July Council of Ministers meeting. The issue will be discussed again in September by E.C. institutions. Garret FitzGerald, Prime Minister of Ireland, outlined for the Parliament the goals of Ireland's six-month presidency of the E.C. Council. Be urged the representatives to continue working for a more unified Europe in which "free movement of people and goods" is a reality, and he called for more "intensified common action" to fight unemployment. Be said European politicians must work to bolster the public's faith in the E.C., noting that budget problems and inter-governmental "wrangles" have overshadolted the Community's benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eu and the Arctic
    MAGAZINE Dealing the Seal 8 No. 1 Piloting Arctic Passages 14 2016 THE CIRCLE The EU & Indigenous Peoples 20 THE EU AND THE ARCTIC PUBLISHED BY THE WWF GLOBAL ARCTIC PROGRAMME TheCircle0116.indd 1 25.02.2016 10.53 THE CIRCLE 1.2016 THE EU AND THE ARCTIC Contents EDITORIAL Leaving a legacy 3 IN BRIEF 4 ALYSON BAILES What does the EU want, what can it offer? 6 DIANA WALLIS Dealing the seal 8 ROBIN TEVERSON ‘High time’ EU gets observer status: UK 10 ADAM STEPIEN A call for a two-tier EU policy 12 MARIA DELIGIANNI Piloting the Arctic Passages 14 TIMO KOIVUROVA Finland: wearing two hats 16 Greenland – walking the middle path 18 FERNANDO GARCES DE LOS FAYOS The European Parliament & EU Arctic policy 19 CHRISTINA HENRIKSEN The EU and Arctic Indigenous peoples 20 NICOLE BIEBOW A driving force: The EU & polar research 22 THE PICTURE 24 The Circle is published quar- Publisher: Editor in Chief: Clive Tesar, COVER: terly by the WWF Global Arctic WWF Global Arctic Programme [email protected] (Top:) Local on sea ice in Uumman- Programme. Reproduction and 8th floor, 275 Slater St., Ottawa, naq, Greenland. quotation with appropriate credit ON, Canada K1P 5H9. Managing Editor: Becky Rynor, Photo: Lawrence Hislop, www.grida.no are encouraged. Articles by non- Tel: +1 613-232-8706 [email protected] (Bottom:) European Parliament, affiliated sources do not neces- Fax: +1 613-232-4181 Strasbourg, France. sarily reflect the views or policies Design and production: Photo: Diliff, Wikimedia Commonss of WWF. Send change of address Internet: www.panda.org/arctic Film & Form/Ketill Berger, and subscription queries to the [email protected] ABOVE: Sarek glacier, Sarek National address on the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates Yorkshire Region
    Page | 1 LIBERAL/LIBERAL DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES IN THE YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE REGION 1945-2015 Constituencies in the county of Yorkshire (excluding Cleveland and Teesside) INCLUDING SDP CANDIDATES in the GENERAL ELECTIONS of 1983 and 1987 PREFACE A number of difficulties have been encountered in compiling this Index which have not been resolved in an entirely satisfactory manner. Local government boundary changes in the early 1970s led to the creation of the Cleveland and HuMberside Counties. Cleveland and adjacent constituencies have been included in the Index for the North East Region. HuMberside constituencies coMMencing with the General Election of February 1974 are included in the Yorkshire Region. The region has been home to an impressive gallery of party personalities, several of whoM receive extended entries. The spirited independence with respect to LPO HQ in London which the Yorkshire Regional Party has often shown, and the relatively strong direction it has exerted over its constituency associations, would account for the formidable challenge maintained in the Region at successive general elections, even in the direst years of party fortunes. Yorkshire appears to have been rather less willing in 1950 to heed to the dictates of the Martell Plan (see article below) than other regions. Even so, until the 1970s there were several Labour-held Mining and industrial constituencies where the Party declined to fight. InforMation on Many candidates reMains sparse. SDP candidates particularly, over 1983-87, seem to have been an anonyMous battalion indeed, few if any of them leaving a Mark on any field of huMan endeavour. 1 Page | 2 THE MARTELL PLAN The Martell Plan, mentioned in passing throughout the regional directories was the electoral strategy adopted by the Liberal Party for the General Election of 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DELEGATION FOR RELATIONS WITH SWITZERLAND, ICELAND, AND NORWAY MINUTES OF THE MEETING Thursday, 14 June 2001 STRASBOURG Contents Page 1. Adoption of the draft agenda (PE 304.342) .................................................................. 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of 21 March 2001 held in Brussels (PE 304.331) .................................................................................................... 2 With a view to the 20th EP-Switzerland Interparliamentary meeting to be held in Prangins on 9-10 July 2001 3. Briefings by : ................................................................................................................. 2 - H.E. Dante MARTINELLI, Ambassador, Mission of Switzerland to the EU, on the situation in Switzerland and on relations with the EU - Mr Matthias BRINKMANN, representing the European Commission, on EU-Switzerland relations followed by an exchange of views 4. Consideration of the draft programme and the draft agenda of the ................................ 3 interparliamentary meeting - nomination of first EP speakers 5. Any other business ........................................................................................................ 3 6. Date and place of the next meeting ............................................................................... 4 _________ 3 July 2001 HO/kn Annex : Attendance list FdR 446373 PE 304.376 The meeting opened at 9.50 with Mr FOLIAS, Chairman, in the Chair. Mr SIMPSON was excused. ***** 1. The draft agenda
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN UNION – the INSTITUTIONS Subject IAIN MCIVER Map
    SPICe THE EUROPEAN UNION – THE INSTITUTIONS subject IAIN MCIVER map This subject map is one of four covering various aspects of the European Union. It provides information on the five institutions of the European 21 May 2007 Union. The institutions manage the way in which the EU functions and the way in which decisions are made. Scottish Parliament The other subject maps in this series are: 07/02 The European Union – A Brief History (07/01) The European Union – The Legislative Process (07/03) The European Union – The Budget (07/04) Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefings are compiled for the benefit of the Members of the Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with MSPs and their staff who should contact Iain McIver on extension 85294 or email [email protected]. Members of the public or external organisations may comment on this briefing by emailing us at [email protected]. However, researchers are unable to enter into personal discussion in relation to SPICe Briefing Papers. If you have any general questions about the work of the Parliament you can email the Parliament’s Public Information Service at [email protected]. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in SPICe briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated or otherwise amended to reflect subsequent changes. www.scottish.parliament.uk 1 THE EU INSTITUTIONS The way the EU functions and the way decisions are made is determined by the institutions which have been established by the member states to run and oversee the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to the European Parliament Concerning The
    A joint project of PETITION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF BREXIT AND THE NEGOTIATION OF THE TERMS OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION PETITION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 20 AND 227 TFEU URGENT – FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION URGENT – FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION PETITION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF BREXIT AND THE NEGOTIATION OF THE TERMS OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION PETITION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 20 and 227 TFEU Executive summary: 1. This Petition is submitted jointly by the EU Rights Clinic and other 80 signatories listed in Annex I. Further information on the main petitioner is contained in Section 1 of this complaint. 2. This Petition seeks to obtain urgent action from the European Parliament in order to remedy the gaps and omissions in the legal protection that have so far been negotiated by the European Commission in respect of the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union. 3. It has become apparent from our discussions with the European Commission and the Council of the EU that the draft Withdrawal Agreement which gives further expression to the Joint Report of 8 December 20171 will not fully cover the entire spectrum of rights which all EU citizens and family members presently enjoy in connection with residence, work and equal treatment under EU law. 4. In this respect, we therefore consider that the statement made by the Commission in its Communication of 8 December 20172 that “the Joint Report means that both Union citizens and United Kingdom nationals, as well as their respective family members can continue to live, work or study as they currently do under the same conditions as under Union law, benefiting from the full application of the prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of nationality” is not correct as a matter of law and fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnecting the European Parliament and Its People Is the Culmination of a Year Long E C O N
    R Reconnecting the European Parliament and its People is the culmination of a year long e c o n project between the Foreign Policy Centre and the European Commission n e c Representation in the United Kingdom. Edited by FPC Policy Director Adam Hug, the t i n g pamphlet includes contributions from Dr Richard Corbett, Dr Michael Shackleton, Liz t h e Atkins, Dr Adam Marshall, Cllr Flo Clucas, Dr Christian Kaunert and Kamil Zwolski. E u r o p e RECoNNECTINg ThE a The pamphlet argues that there is clearly room for improvement in the way MEPs and n P a the Parliament engage with the British public and a need to reform the electoral r l i a EURoPEAN PARLIAmENT system . The report seeks to provide positive recommendations for action that help m e n strengthen the bond between the European Parliament and the people it represents. t a n AND ITS PEoPLE d i t s P e o p Edited by Adam hug l e T h e F o r e i g n P o l i c y C e n t r e a The Foreign Policy Centre n d Suite 11, Second floor E u r 23-28 Penn Street o p London N1 5DL e a n United Kingdom C o www.fpc.org.uk m [email protected] m i s s © Foreign Policy Centre 2010 i o All rights reserved n R e p r ISBN-13 978-1-905833-18-4 e s e ISBN-10 1-905833-18-0 n t a t i o £4.95 n i n t h e U K Reconnecting the European Parliament and its People Edited by Adam Hug First Published in September 2010 by The Foreign Policy Centre Suite 11, Second Floor, 23-28 Penn Street London, N1 5DL United Kingdom www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] ©Foreign Policy Centre 2010 All Rights Reserved ISBN 13 978-1-905833-18-4
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21St Century
    Serving Scotland Better: Better: Scotland Serving Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century Final Report – June 2009 Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century 21st the in Kingdom United the and Scotland Commission on Scottish Devolution Secretariat 1 Melville Crescent Edinburgh EH3 7HW 2009 June – Report Final Tel: (020) 7270 6759 or (0131) 244 9073 Email: [email protected] This Report is also available online at: www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk © Produced by the Commission on Scottish Devolution 75% Printed on paper consisting of 75% recycled waste Presented to the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and to the Secretary of State for Scotland, on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century | Final Report – June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century It was a privilege to be asked to chair a Commission to consider how the Scottish Parliament could serve the people of Scotland better. It is a task that has taken just over a year and seen my colleagues and me travelling the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been very hard work – but also very rewarding. Many of the issues are complex, but at the heart of this is our desire to find ways to help improve the lives of the people of Scotland. The reward has been in meeting so many people and discussing the issues with them – at formal evidence sessions, at informal meetings, and at engagement events across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Parliamentary Committee
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE 27TH MEETING OF THE EEA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE 19 October 2006 Brussels Ref. No. 1070396 MINUTES OF THE 27 th MEETING Brussels 10 October 2006 CONTENTS Page 1. Opening of the meeting......................................................................................3 2. Adoption of the Draft Agenda ...........................................................................3 3. Approval of the minutes of the 26th meeting of the EEA JPC (1069356)..........3 4. Development of the EEA Agreement and follow up to resolutions adopted at the 26th Meeting of the EEA Joint Parliamentary Committee Statements by - Mr Helge SKAARA, Deputy Head, Norwegian Mission to the EU, representing the President-in-Office of the EEA Council and the President-in-Office of the EEA Joint Committee - Mr Pekka HUHTANIEMI, Under-Secretary of State, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, representing the EU President of the EEA Council - Mr Matthias BRINKMANN, European Commission, Acting EU President of the EEA Joint Committee - Mr Bjørn T. GRYDELAND, President of the EFTA Surveillance Authority followed by an exchange of views.............................................................3+4+5 5. Consideration of the draft report on The implementation of EEA legislation (1069784)............................................................................................................5 Co-rapporteurs: Mr Gudlaugur Thór THÓRDARSON (Independence Party, Iceland) Ms Diana WALLIS (ALDE, UK) 6. Vote on the draft
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report
    annual report 2012 www.eu40.eu 1 Introductory notes Since its foundation in 2007, EU40 is organising content events with prestigious and high-level speakers inside the traditional premises of the European Parliament, as well as informal networking events aimed at getting to know each other and creating a better collaboration among young MEPs, staffers and stakeholders from various fields. With the time, EU40 established itself as a landmark for organising engaging events that draw the participation of many different audiences, not only of those usually interested in the typical 'Brussels Bubble' type events. Here following a summary of the events EU40 hosted in 2012: The Presidential Debate 3 Discussing Global Youth issues with Hilary Clinton’s Special Adviser 4 Juncker and Trichet Debate 5 Summer BBQ 2012 6 The State of Europe high-level Roundtable 7 Driving Growth in Europe through Exports 8 Science Rules! Star Trek in the EP 9 Enabling Electricity 10 ‘40 under 40’. European Young Leaders to shape Europe’s future 11 EU40 Website tracking 12-14 2 The Presidential Debate - 11 January 2012 On 11 January 2012, EU40 hosted the 'Presidential Debate' with the candidates for President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz, Diana Wallis and Nirj Deva. It is the established custom of EU40, European Voice and Vote Watch Europe with the support of Burson Marsteller to organise this debate in the European Parliament on the eve of the election of a new Parliament President. We regard the election of the Parliament’s President as a significant event, worthy of a debate that comprises issues of policy, personality and procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Divisions in the European Parliament
    THE AUTHORS Gawain Towler was Conservative candidate in Glasgow Maryhill in the 2001 General Election. He has worked in the European Parliament for two years, and is the Commonwealth Editor of the World Parliamentarian Magazine. He is a member of the Bow Group and a former Vice-Chairman of the Conservative Graduates. Emmanuel Bordez is a staff member for the French unattached MEPs. After graduating in Political Science (Université de Bordeaux), he worked in local government in France in a senior advisory capacity. He has advised French eurosceptic MEPs (including P. de Villiers of Mouvement pour la France) since 1994. This paper represents his personal view. Dr Lee Rotherham was Conservative Candidate in St Helens South in the 2001 General Election. He is Secretary of Conservatives Against a Federal Europe, and has been Special Adviser on European Affairs to three successive Shadow Foreign Secretaries. The aim of the Centre for Policy Studies is to develop and promote policies that provide freedom and encouragement for individuals to pursue the aspirations they have for themselves and their families, within the security and obligations of a stable and law-abiding nation. The views expressed in our publications are, however, the sole responsibility of the authors. Contributions are chosen for their value in informing public debate and should not be taken as representing a corporate view of the CPS or of its Directors. The CPS values its independence and does not carry on activities with the intention of affecting public support for any registered political party or for candidates at election, or to influence voters in a referendum.
    [Show full text]