Pinyon Pine – Management Guidelines for Common Pests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pinyon Pine – Management Guidelines for Common Pests PIN YO N PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests JoAnne Skelly Extension Educator, Carson City/Storey County University of Nevada Cooperative Extension John Christopherson Resource Management Officer, Nevada Division of For EB-03-02 PIN YO N PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests JoAnne Skelly Extension Educator, Carson City/Storey County University of Nevada Cooperative Extension John Christopherson Resource Management Officer, Nevada Division of Forestry Funded in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service. This reprint was made possible with funds from an Assistance Agreement with the Bureau of Land Management and Storey County Fire Protection District in collaboration with University of Nevada Cooperative Extension. Copyright © 2003, 2nd edition, 2nd printing 2016. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension is a partnership of Nevada counties; University of Nevada, Reno; and U. S. Department of Agriculture. The University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada Division of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service are equal opportunity affirmative action employers and do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, creed, national origin, veteran status, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or genetic information in any program or activity they operate. The University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada Division of Forestry and USDA Forest Service employ only United States citizens and aliens lawfully authorized to work in the United States. CONTENTS Introduction and Description . 7 Keeping Trees Healthy . 9 Pinyon Forest Management Guidelines . 13 Common Pests . 15 Insects Pinyon Ips Beetle . 15 Red Turpentine Beetle . 17 Twig Beetle . 19 Pinyon Needle Scale . 20 Pitch Mass Borer . 22 Pinyon Tip Moth . 23 Pinyon Sawfly . 24 Diseases Black Stain Root Disease . 25 Pinyon Needle Rust . 26 Pinyon Blister Rust . 27 Pinyon Dwarf Mistletoe . 27 Conclusion . 31 Glossary . 33 References . 35 Photo Credits . 37 PINYON PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests : 7 INTRODUCTION inyon pine (Pinus monophylla) know how to take care of the native woodlands occur on many of pines. This guide will help homeown- thPe mountai n ranges of Nevada. ers identify and manage common With development spreading into pests of pinyon pine. The guide these woodlands, home landscapes discusses general practices to often include singleleaf pinyon. maintain healthy trees, lists specific Home-owners wishing to maintain pests, and outlines management these native landscapes need to strategies. DESCRIPTION ne of Nevada’s two state trees, conifer, taking as long as 60 years to singleleaf pinyon is also one of reach about 6.5 feet. However, it theO pr edominant trees in the Great typically grows from 2 to 4 inches per Basin, growing not only in Nevada, but year with mature trees reaching 20 also in parts of California, and feet to 40 feet, depending on the site western Utah. It tolerates drier quality. Its life span can be greater conditions better than other Nevada than 600 years. pines. In the drier portions of its range, it is often found in association Across its extensive range in the with Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosper- state, pinyon is important to wildlife, ma). It grows at elevations ranging providing food and cover for many from approximately 3,200 feet to species including birds and large and 9,200 feet. small mammals. Trees are also of considerable cultural value to Native Singleleaf pinyon is a slow growing Americans of the Great Basin. PINYON PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests : 9 KEEPING TREES HEALTHY ealthy trees have fewer insect Constant irrigation can rot pinyon and disease problems than roots, causing diseases, branch tHrees that are stressed. It is impor- dieback, and death. tant to keep trees vigorous by reducing human-caused stress factors The pinyon’s growth, starting in April such as improper irrigation, construc- and ending in September or October, tion damage, soil compaction, and is supported by stored soil moisture improper fertilizer or chemical use. rather than spring or summer rains. Watering a pinyon pine should mimic natural rain or snow, and should be Pinyon pines in home landscapes done primarily from December to require minimal maintenance. They April if a winter is unusually dry. are growing in their native habitat, and therefore are adapted to the site. During periods of drought in winter Irrigation and fertilization are typically and early spring, trees should be given unnecessary except when trees have a deep watering monthly. Keep water been damaged by human activity or away from the root crown (Figure 1, weather. next page). An exception to the “don’t irrigate Avoiding Stress Factors: Humans pinyon” rule is when trees have lost often impact trees with their daily roots due to excavation. Then it is activities. Trees that have been necessary to provide supplemental injured, above- or below-ground, are prime candidates for attack by insects irrigation to keep soil moist through and diseases. Root damage is a the growing season (May to Septem- ber). This should encourage new root common source of tree stress caused development to replace damaged by humans. roots. Be careful not to overwater; allow soil to drain between waterings. Root systems of pinyon are often Do not leave standing water in the damaged by overwatering. Because root zone. Pinyon pines need well- their native habitats are drier than drained soils. those of other pines, too much water can cause root problems and death. Construction often damages trees by Homeowners used to watering compacting soil, destroying roots, and landscape trees such as Austrian scraping bark. In order to protect (Pinus nigra) or Scotch (Pinus sylvestris) trees from construction hazards, pine regularly through the summer, protective zones should be estab- often mistakenly irrigate their pinyon lished around individual trees and similarly. Pinyon trees should never groups of trees. These zones should have irrigated landscapes planted be clearly delineated with brightly around them. colored flagging. 10 Since pinyon roots often extend out branches with a sharp knife. Do not from the trunk two to three times remove bark that is firmly attached. the tree’s height, and are located near Don’t use a sealant on wounds; leave the soil surface, it is difficult to avoid them exposed. damaging them. Therefore, it is important to consider these root systems when locating structures, Natural Target Pruning access lanes, and utility lines. Avoid 1. Find Target A — Just outside of paving over tree roots. the branch bark ridge. At a minimum, keep construction- 2. Find Target B — Swelling where related activity outside the dripline of branch meets collar. trees planned for retention (Figure 1). 3. Make cuts — Use the ‘three-cut’ method for two inch and larger limbs. Make a first cut on the underside of the branch 8 to 10 inches from where the branch connects to the trunk. Cut a third to halfway through the limb. Make the second cut from 1 to 3 inches outside the first cut, starting on the top and cutting through the branch. Make the final cut at line AB, just outside the Figure 1. Tree’s dripline and root branch collar. crown Correcting Existing Problems: Homeowners often inherit tree problems upon purchase of a proper- ty. What can be done to reduce stress factors and encourage tree vigor in this case? Prune off any broken branches or branch stubs. Pruning cuts should follow natural target pruning guide- lines (Figure 2). DO NOT: Remove any soil deeper than 6 inches • Cut behind the branch bark added during recent construction ridge over a tree’s root zone down to the • Leave stubs original soil grade. Aerate and mulch • Cut branch collar compacted soils and older fill. • Paint cuts Loose bark should be removed from Figure 2. Natural target pruning the edges of wounds on the trunk or PINYON PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests : 11 Trees that have sustained significant and all branches up as high as possible root damage may need to be sprayed on uninfested trees. March is the with an insecticide for one to two best time to spray. Contact Nevada seasons to protect them from bark Department of Agriculture for a list beetle attack. of pesticides registered for bark beetle on pine. There are no chemical sprays to save trees that are already infested with Another corrective action that can be beetles. However, spraying uninfested taken in an existing landscape is to trees with insecticides can protect remove lawn or other plantings them during times of stress or requiring water from the area between following injury. Spray the main trunk the trunk and the dripline of the tree. PINYON PINE Management Guidelines For Common Pests : 13 PINYON FOREST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES he management guidelines for Trees infected with dwarf mistletoe pinyon contained here are very (see page 27), a parasitic plant, and Tgeneral. Specific recommendations those with numerous branch and need to be tailored to the individual stem cankers are also good choices site and take into consideration the for removal. Insect infested trees landowner’s objectives. should be evaluated for removal as well. Retain trees that have been Thinning: One of the primary good cone producers. Look for factors leading to poor tree health is immature and old cones in the too many trees spaced too closely. branches and accumulations of fallen Thinning, the selective removal of cones beneath the tree (Figure 3). individual trees to reduce tree density, is an important management Keep large trees with healthy, vigor- practice that improves tree health ous crowns (Figure 4, next page). If and vigor and decreases wildfire your property has both pinyon and potential as well. juniper, keep junipers too. A mixed stand will help deter the spread of Little research-based information insects and diseases. exists from which to develop guide- lines for thinning in pinyon stands. Try to achieve a spacing between There are, however, many general trees that is roughly equivalent to considerations that apply to all forest one and a half times the average tree types that should be considered height.
Recommended publications
  • Bark Beetles
    Bark Beetles O & T Guide [O-#03] Carol A. Sutherland Extension and State Entomologist Cooperative Extension Service z College of Agriculture and Home Economics z October 2006 Although New Mexico bark beetle adults are In monogamous species such as the Douglas small, rarely exceeding 1/3 inch in length, they fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, the are very capable of killing even the largest female bores the initial gallery into the host host trees with a mass assault, girdling them or tree, releases pheromones attractive to her inoculating them with certain lethal pathogens. species and accepts one male as her mate. Some species routinely attack the trunks and major limbs of their host trees, other bark beetle species mine the twigs of their hosts, pruning and weakening trees and facilitating the attack of other tree pests. While many devastating species of bark beetles are associated with New Mexico conifers, other species favor broadleaf trees and can be equally damaging. Scientifically: Bark beetles belong to the insect order Coleoptera and the family Scolytidae. Adult “engraver beetle” in the genus Ips. The head is on the left; note the “scooped out” area Metamorphosis: Complete rimmed by short spines on the rear of the Mouth Parts: Chewing (larvae and adults) beetle, a common feature for members of this Pest Stages: Larvae and adults. genus. Photo: USDA Forest Service Archives, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org Typical Life Cycle: Adult bark beetles are strong fliers and are highly receptive to scents In polygamous species such as the pinyon bark produced by damaged or stressed host trees as beetle, Ips confusus, the male bores a short well as communication pheromones produced nuptial chamber into the host’s bark, releases by other members of their species.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Insect Pests of Concern
    Utah’s Insect Pests of Concern: Fruit, Tree Borers, and Nuisance Western Horticultural Inspection Society, October 1, 2015 Diane Alston, Entomologist, Utah State University Some of the Tenacious Fruit and Nut Insect Pests Tephritid Fruit Flies ▪ ‘True’ fruit flies (~1/4 inch long) Apple Maggot: “F” ▪ 3 primary pest species in Utah Quarantine Pest ▪ Females have a sharp ovipositor to lay eggs under the skin of fruits & husks ▪ Susceptible when “soft enough”, e.g., blushed cherry Walnut Huskfly: ▪ Characteristic banding pattern on wings “Inverted V” ▪ Differentiate species ▪ Maggots tunnel in fruit ▪ Legless, cylindrical body (~1/4 inch long when full grown) Cherry Fruit Fly: ▪ Tapered head, 2 dark mouth hooks “Funky F & Small Window” Apple Maggot Native to Eastern North America: Primarily a Pest of Apple Egg-laying punctures in apple Larval tunnels in apple flesh Apple Maggot History in Utah ▪ Not currently a pest of commercial orchards ▪ Regulated as quarantine insect ▪ If established in commercial orchards, inflict substantial economic harm through loss of export markets ▪ First detected in western U.S. in Oregon in 1979; has spread in the PNW ▪ In Utah, first detected in cherry orchards in Mapleton (Utah Co.) in 1983 ▪ An extensive statewide survey in 1985 found it widely distributed in northern and west central UT ▪ River hawthorn (Crataegus rivularis Nutt.) ▪ Unmanaged cherries ▪ May be native to Utah (widely established) Apple Maggot in Utah - 2013 ▪ Home yard plum fruits ▪ River hawthorn nearby AM larva inside plum fruit ▪ No insecticide
    [Show full text]
  • Pinus Nigra V
    Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use European black pine Pinus nigra V. Isajev1, B. Fady2, H. Semerci3 and V. Andonovski4 1 Forestry Faculty of Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro EUFORGEN 2 INRA, Mediterranean Forest Research Unit, Avignon, France 3 Forest Tree Seeds&Tree Breeding Research Directorate, Ankara,Turkey 4 Faculty of Forestry, Skopje, Macedonia FYR These Technical Guidelines are intended to assist those who cherish the valuable European black pine genepool and its inheritance, through conserving valuable seed sources or use in practical forestry. The focus is on conserving the genetic diversity of the species at the European scale. The recommendations provided in this module should be regarded as a commonly agreed basis to be complemented and further developed in local, national or regional conditions. The Guidelines are based on the available knowledge of the species and on widely accepted methods for the conservation of forest genetic resources. Biology and ecology although seed yield is abundant only every 2–4 years. Trees reach sexual maturity at 15–20 years in The European black pine (Pinus their natural habitat. Flowers nigra Arnold) grows up to 30 appear in May. Female inflores- (rarely 40–50) m tall, with a trunk cences are reddish, and male that is usually straight. The bark catkins are yellow. Fecundation is light grey to dark grey-brown, occurs 13 months after pollina- deeply furrowed longitudinally on tion. Cones are sessile and hori- older trees. The crown is broadly zontally spreading, 4–8 cm long, conical on young trees, umbrel- 2–4 cm wide, yellow-brown or la-shaped on older trees, light yellow and glossy.
    [Show full text]
  • EVERGREEN TREES for NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson
    THE NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM PRESENTS EVERGREEN TREES FOR NEBRASKA Justin Evertson & Bob Henrickson. For more plant information, visit plantnebraska.org or retreenbraska.unl.edu Throughout much of the Great Plains, just a handful of species make up the majority of evergreens being planted. This makes them extremely vulnerable to challenges brought on by insects, extremes of weather, and diseases. Utilizing a variety of evergreen species results in a more diverse and resilient landscape that is more likely to survive whatever challenges come along. Geographic Adaptability: An E indicates plants suitable primarily to the Eastern half of the state while a W indicates plants that prefer the more arid environment of western Nebraska. All others are considered to be adaptable to most of Nebraska. Size Range: Expected average mature height x spread for Nebraska. Common & Proven Evergreen Trees 1. Arborvitae, Eastern ‐ Thuja occidentalis (E; narrow habit; vertically layered foliage; can be prone to ice storm damage; 20‐25’x 5‐15’; cultivars include ‘Techny’ and ‘Hetz Wintergreen’) 2. Arborvitae, Western ‐ Thuja plicata (E; similar to eastern Arborvitae but not as hardy; 25‐40’x 10‐20; ‘Green Giant’ is a common, fast growing hybrid growing to 60’ tall) 3. Douglasfir (Rocky Mountain) ‐ Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (soft blue‐green needles; cones have distinctive turkey‐foot bract; graceful habit; avoid open sites; 50’x 30’) 4. Fir, Balsam ‐ Abies balsamea (E; narrow habit; balsam fragrance; avoid open, windswept sites; 45’x 20’) 5. Fir, Canaan ‐ Abies balsamea var. phanerolepis (E; similar to balsam fir; common Christmas tree; becoming popular as a landscape tree; very graceful; 45’x 20’) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Conifer Trees in Iowa This Publication Is Designed to Help Identify the Most Common Trees Found in Iowa
    Identification of Conifer Trees in Iowa This publication is designed to help identify the most common trees found in Iowa. It is based on vegetative characteristics including leaves, fruit, and bark. It is neither complete nor without possible oversights. Separate species are grouped by similar characteristics, mainly based on type and arrangement of leaves. These groups are; awl- or scale- like needles; single needles, flattened with rounded tips; single needles, square in cross section, with pointed tips; and needles in bundles or fasticles of two or more. Remember, vegetative character- istics are quite variable; use more than one specimen for comparison. Awl- or scale-like needles Juniperus Virginiana Eastern Red Cedar Leaves are dark green; leaves are both awl- and scale-like; cone is dark blue and berry-like. Thuja occidentalis Northern White Cedar Leaves are flattened and only of the scale type; cones have 4-6 scales; foliage is light green. Juniperus communis Common Juniper Leaves are awl shaped; cone is dark blue and berry-like. Pm-1383 | May 1996 Single needles, flattened with rounded tips Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir Needles occur on raised pegs; 3/4-11/4 inches in length; cones have 3-pointed bracts between the cone scales. Abies balsamea Abies concolor Balsam Fir White (Concolor) Fir Needles are blunt and notched at Needles are somewhat pointed, the tip; 3/4-11/2 inches in length. curved towards the branch top and 11/2-3 inches in length; silver green in color. Single needles, Picea abies Norway Spruce square in cross Needles are 1/2-1 inch long; section, with needles are dark green; foliage appears to droop or weep; cone pointed tips is 4-7 inches long.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Conifers in New Mexico Landscapes
    Ornamental Horticulture Common Conifers in New Mexico Landscapes Bob Cain, Extension Forest Entomologist One-Seed Juniper (Juniperus monosperma) Description: One-seed juniper grows 20-30 feet high and is multistemmed. Its leaves are scalelike with finely toothed margins. One-seed cones are 1/4-1/2 inch long berrylike structures with a reddish brown to bluish hue. The cones or “berries” mature in one year and occur only on female trees. Male trees produce Alligator Juniper (Juniperus deppeana) pollen and appear brown in the late winter and spring compared to female trees. Description: The alligator juniper can grow up to 65 feet tall, and may grow to 5 feet in diameter. It resembles the one-seed juniper with its 1/4-1/2 inch long, berrylike structures and typical juniper foliage. Its most distinguishing feature is its bark, which is divided into squares that resemble alligator skin. Other Characteristics: • Ranges throughout the semiarid regions of the southern two-thirds of New Mexico, southeastern and central Arizona, and south into Mexico. Other Characteristics: • An American Forestry Association Champion • Scattered distribution through the southern recently burned in Tonto National Forest, Arizona. Rockies (mostly Arizona and New Mexico) It was 29 feet 7 inches in circumference, 57 feet • Usually a bushy appearance tall, and had a 57-foot crown. • Likes semiarid, rocky slopes • If cut down, this juniper can sprout from the stump. Uses: Uses: • Birds use the berries of the one-seed juniper as a • Alligator juniper is valuable to wildlife, but has source of winter food, while wildlife browse its only localized commercial value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Structure of the European Black Pine (Pinus Nigra Arnold) Is Shaped by Its Recent Holocene Demographic History
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/535591; this version posted January 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The genetic structure of the European black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) is shaped by its recent Holocene demographic history. Authors: Guia Giovannelli1,2*, Caroline Scotti-Saintagne1*, Ivan Scotti1, Anne Roig1, Ilaria Spanu3, 5 Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin3, Frédéric Guibal2, Bruno Fady1** 1: INRA, UR629, Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Domaine Saint Paul, 84914 Avignon, France 10 2: Aix-Marseille Université, IMBE, Avenue Louis Philibert, Aix-en-Provence, France 3: Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy *: Guia Giovannelli and Caroline Scotti-Saintagne contributed equally to this work 15 **: author for correspondence: bruno.fady(at)inra.fr Highlights • The European black pine, Pinus nigra (Arnold), has a weak spatial genetic structure. • Gene flow among populations is frequent and populations are often of admixed origin. 20 • Current genealogies result from recent, late Pleistocene or Holocene events. • Seven modern genetic lineages emerged from divergence and demographic contractions. • These seven lineages warrant a revision of subspecies taxonomic nomenclature. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/535591; this version posted January 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 25 Abstract Fragmentation acting over geological times confers wide, biogeographical scale, genetic diversity patterns to species, through demographic and natural selection processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Gerald J. Gottfried, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Flagstaff, Arizona Thomas W. Swetnam, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Craig D. Allen, USDI National Biological Service, Los,Alamos, New Mexico Julio L. Betancourt, USDI Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona Alice L. Chung-MacCoubrey, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico INTRODUCTION system management generally is accepted, the USDA Forest Service, other public land management agen­ Pinyon-juniper woodlands are one of the largest cies, American Indian tribes, and private landown­ ecosystems in the Southwest and in the Middle Rio ers may have differing definitions of what constitutes Grande Basin (Fig. 1). The woodlands have been desired conditions. important to the region's inhabitants since prehis­ Key questions about the pinyon-juniper ecosys­ toric times for a variety of natural resources and tems remain unanswered. Some concern the basic amenities. The ecosystems have not been static; their dynamics of biological and physical components of distributions, stand characteristics, and site condi­ the pinyon-juniper ecosystems. Others concern the tions have been altered by changes in climatic pat­ distribution of woodlands prior to European settle­ terns and human use and, often, abuse. Management ment and changes since the introduction of livestock of these lands since European settlement has varied and fire control. This relates to whether tree densi­ from light exploitation and benign neglect, to attempts ties have been increasing or whether trees are invad­ to remove the trees in favor of forage for livestock, and ing grasslands and, to a lesser extent, drier ponde­ then to a realization that these lands contain useful re­ rosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    Grand Canyon Flora: Upper Bright Angel Trail # Famil ID Scientific Name (*)Common Name #iN Mile #Pl/Loc Lycopods 1 Selag Selaginella mutica spike-moss 1 1.81 1/1 Gymnosperms 2 Cupre Juniperus osteosperma Utah juniper 5 0.00 20/9 3 Ephed Ephedra viridis green ephedra 9 0.34 50/9 4 Pinac Pinus edulis two-needle pinyon pine 9 0.00 50/9 5 Pinac Pinus ponderosa ponderosa pine 3 0.13 / 6 Pinac Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca Rocky Mountain Douglas fir 7 0.38 10/3 Eudicots 7 Amara Amaranthus albus *tumble pigweed 0.02 5/2 8 Amara Amaranthus powellii Powell's amaranth 0.00 20/2 9 Amara Atriplex canescens fourwing saltbush 3.73 1/1 10 Amara Atriplex rosea *tumbling oracle 0.02 40/2 11 Amara Chenopodium fremontii Fremont's goosefoot 0.08 20/5 12 Amara Salsola tragus *Russian thistle 1 0.01 20/3 13 Anaca Rhus aromatica skunkbush 2 1.17 20/6 14 Apiac Yabea microcarpa California hedge-parsley 3.46 2/1 15 Apocy Asclepias subverticillata poison milkweed 3.61 1/1 16 Aster Acourtia wrightii brownfoot 3 3.46 2/2 17 Aster Ageratina herbacea fragrant snakeroot 3 0.20 30/5 18 Aster Artemisia bigelovii Bigelow sagebrush 1 1.77 iN/1 19 Aster Artemisia ludoviciana silver wormwood 1 0.05 99/9 20 Aster Artemisia nova black sagebrush 0.23 x/1 21 Aster Artemisia tridentata big sagebrush 0.15 30/9 22 Aster Baccharis salicifolia mule fat 2 IG iN/1 23 Aster Baccharis sarothroides broom baccharis 1 4.60 iN/1 24 Aster Brickellia californica California brickellbush 6 0.04 99/9 25 Aster Brickellia longifolia longleaf brickellbush 2 1.71 99/9 26 Aster Chaetopappa ericoides rose heath 0.44 20/6 27 Aster Cirsium arizonicum Arizona thistle 9 0.05 30/9 28 Aster Dieteria canescens hoary-aster 7 0.00 50/9 29 Aster Encelia resinifera resin brittlebush 3.28 30/7 30 Aster Ericameria arizonica Grand Canyon Goldenweed 1 0.12 20/8 31 Aster Ericameria nauseosa var.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTRIBUTES ASSOCIATED with PROBABILITY of INFESTATION by the PINON IPS, IPS Confusus (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), in PINON PINE, PINUS EDULIS
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Western North American Naturalist 63(4), ©2003, pp. 440-451 ATTRIBUTES ASSOCIATED WItH PROBABILITY OF INFESTATION BY THE PINON IPS, IPS CONFuSus (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), IN PINON PINE, PINUS EDULIS Jose E Negronl and Jill L. Wilson2 ABSTRACT.-We examined attributes of pinon pine (Pinus edulis) associated with the probability of infestation by pinon ips (Ips con}usus) in an outbreak in the Coconino National Forest, Arizona. We used data collected from 87 plots, 59 infested and 28 uninfested, and a logistic regression approach to estimate the probability ofinfestation based on plot­ and tree-level attributes. Pinon pine stand density index was a good predictor ofthe likelihood ofinfestation by pinon ips at the plot level, and a cross-validation analysis confirmed that the model correctly classified 82% ofthe cases. Diam­ eter at root collar and pifion dwarf mistletoe infestation level were good predictors ofindividual tree infestation, and a cross-validation analysis indicated that the model correctly classified 72% of the cases. Results suggest that the occur­ rence of pinon ips infestations may be related to stress factors associated with increased stocking and pinon dwarf mistletoe infestations. Key words: Ips confusus, pinon ips, bark beetles, Pinus edulis, pinon pine. Piiion-juniper woodlands are the most widely winter from about November to March in distributed forest type in the western United colonies in the basal portion of standing trees States. Covering about 19 million ha in the West (Chansler 1964). In the spring new host trees (Evans 1988), these woodlands are the most are initially attacked by male beetles, which common vegetation types in Arizona and New excavate a nuptial chamber and are then joined Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinyon Jay Movement, Nest Site Selection, Nest Fate
    PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By MICHAEL COULTER NOVAK Bachelor of Science in Zoology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2019 PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Thesis Approved: Dr. Loren M. Smith Thesis Adviser Dr. Scott T. McMurry Dr. Craig A. Davis ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Loren Smith, for his expert assistance guiding me through my thesis. Through his mentorship I learned to be a more effective writer and scientist. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Scott McMurry and Dr. Craig Davis, for their valuable input on my research. Much thanks to Oklahoma State University for providing excellent academic resources and being a great place to develop professional skills required for today’s workforce. I want to thank my parents, Michael Novak and Kathleen Murphy, who have always encouraged me to work hard and be happy. I’m especially grateful for their understanding and encouragement throughout my transient career as a seasonal field biologist. Thanks, Dad, for encouraging me to find a job where they pay me to travel. Thanks, Mom, for encouraging me to pursue higher education and for keeping me on track. Thanks to my sister, Marisol Novak, for her siblingship and being a willing ear to vent my problems to. My family has always believed in me and they inspire me to continue putting one foot in front of the other, even when things are difficult.
    [Show full text]