Beyond IQ: Theories of Hot Intelligence 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond IQ: Theories of Hot Intelligence 8 PAIC08 3/13/07 11:47 Page 102 Beyond IQ: Theories of Hot Intelligence 8 There is nobody so irritating as somebody with less intelligence and more sense than we have. Don Herold (1889–1966) An intelligence test sometimes shows a man how smart he would have been not to have taken it. Laurence J. Peter (1919–88) Key Terms emotional intelligence practical intelligence hot intelligences social intelligence multiple intelligences trait emotional intelligence Chapter Outline 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.2 STREETWISE RATHER THAN BOOK-SMART 8.3 EARLY BEGINNINGS: THORNDIKE’S SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 8.3.1 Defining social intelligence 8.4 THEORETICAL IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 8.5 EARLY PROBLEMS 8.6 RECENT APPROACHES: FROM MULTI-DIMENSIONALITY TO IMPLICIT THEORIES 8.7 EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE 8.8 DEBATE AND CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE 8.9 ORIGINS AND MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS OF EQ 8.10 TRAIT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: EMOTIONAL SELF-EFFICACY 8.11 PRACTICAL INTELLIGENCE 8.12 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .. PAIC08 3/13/07 11:47 Page 103 Beyond IQ: Theories of Hot Intelligence 103 8.1 INTRODUCTION Sternberg’s practical intelligence, and Salovey, Mayer, and Goleman’s emotional intelligence. This chapter focuses mainly Despite the accuracy of cognitive ability measures in predicting on social and emotional intelligence, though many of the con- school and work success (see chapters 5 and 6), the importance of ceptual and methodological problems underlying these abilities IQ scores has been repeatedly challenged in the last ten years. In can be applied to any theory of hot intelligence. turn, this has encouraged researchers to conceptualize alternative or novel abilities such as social, practical, and emotional intelli- 8.2 STREETWISE RATHER gence. Thus some have argued that the ability to solve mathem- atical or logical problems, such as those included in traditional THAN BOOK-SMART IQ tests, bears little relation to real-life success and that IQ Few arguments have been more effective in persuading people researchers have simply been “missing the point” when concep- about the futility of IQ than the stereotypical example of the tualizing cognitive abilities. Because of the array of non-cognitive scientist who is practically handicapped when it comes to inter- (e.g., affective, interpersonal, dispositional) traits they encompass, acting with others. Likewise, IQ skeptics are full of examples of these types of abilities are often referred to as hot intelligences, people who succeed in life despite their apparently low IQs, for in contrast to the more ana- example, famous politicians who did poorly at school, rich busi- lytical, logical, and perhaps hot intelligences types of ability nessmen with no formal education, and so on. Being streetwise, it “cold” characteristics of tra- that encompass an array of non- seems, is almost incompatible with, and more important than, ditional cognitive abilities. cognitive traits, e.g., the ability to being book-smart. Consider, for instance, the following case: Throughout this chapter, interact with others in social situ- I examine both claims and ations, in contrast to the more Paolo is 30 years old and has a PhD in physics, an IQ of 146, and evidence associated with the ability to solve mathematical problems most people would analytical, “cold” characteristics of theories of hot intelligences. not even be able to read. Yet, the “power” of Paolo’s brain is traditional cognitive abilities, e.g., Although their contribution not as clearly manifested in apparently simple everyday life tasks. the ability to solve abstract mathe- to individual differences the- For example, he finds it difficult to make friends and has trouble matical problems ory and research has met communicating and, above all, establishing romantic or sexual wide disapproval from the relationships with others. It seems as though he is as incapable of understanding other people as he is capable of understanding the academic establishment, hot intelligences have attracted more complex world of Black Holes, protons, and water molecules. popular interest than any other recent topic in individual differ- Despite multiple academic awards, Paolo is single, unhappy, and ences and represent a growing area of research in differential has no close friends. psychology. What these abilities have in common is that they attempt to expand the traditional concept of intelligence and pro- Most hot intelligence theorists have quoted similar examples vide explanations for individual differences in performance beyond to persuade people that traditional cognitive ability tests measure IQ in the real world. the wrong type of abilities. These tests, they say, may be useful to Figure 8.1 summarizes basic labels, main authors, and quick predict academic success but the abilities they measure say little definitions of the four most salient theories of hot intelligence, or nothing about a person’s ability to do well in real life or where namely, Thorndike’s original social intelligence, Gardner’s multiple it really matters. Thus, regardless of their specific conceptual and intelligences (which include traditional as well as novel abilities, the empirical approaches, hot intelligence theories have more or less latter including bodily, social, spiritual, and musical intelligences), assumed that: 1920... 1983... 1985... 1990... Social Multiple Practical Emotional intelligence intelligences intelligence intelligence Salovey Thorndike Gardner Sternberg Mayer Goleman Bodily, Do well Identify and Act wisely social, in everyday manage in spiritual, life; own and interpersonal musical being others’ relations skills streetwise emotions Figure 8.1 Hot intelligences at a glance. .. PAIC08 3/13/07 11:47 Page 104 104 Beyond IQ: Theories of Hot Intelligence 1. IQ is not everything, i.e., it does not provide a full account of individual differences in the real world or everyday life success. Intelligence 2. Interpersonal skills are independent of cognitive abilities, i.e., people who score on IQ tests are not necessarily “able” when it comes to dealing with others. 3. Interpersonal skills are more important in real life than academic abilities. 4. Interpersonal skills should be conceptualized as a form of ability or intelligence, i.e., it is better to be streetwise than Mechanical Abstract Social book-smart. Ability to manage Ability to manage Ability to manage However, such assumptions require an array of scientific evid- objects ideas people ence that would largely disconfirm previous findings on intelli- Figure 8.2 Thorndike’s three intelligences, mechanical, abstract, gence (and by previous I mean 100 years of evidence for the and social. validity of IQ tests, as reviewed in chapters 5 and 6). Why, how, and when, then, did psychologists begin the quest for novel abilities? social intelligence or “the ability to understand and manage men and women, boys and girls – to act wisely in human relations” 8.3 EARLY BEGINNINGS: (p. 228) (see Figure 8.2). THORNDIKE’S SOCIAL Soon thereafter, Moss and Hunt (1927) provided a simplified definition of social intelligence in terms of “the ability to get INTELLIGENCE along with others” (p. 108), which is helpful to provide a quick and straightforward explanation of the construct. At a time when psychologists were largely concerned with the Another classic, more comprehensive description of the con- prediction of academic performance or military aptitude (see struct of social intelligence was Vernon’s (1933) definition as the chapter 5), Edward Thorndike (1874–1949), a student of J. M. “ability to get along with people in general, social technique or Cattell (see section 5.3.2), conceptualized individual differences ease in society, knowledge of social matters, susceptibility to in two domains he hypothesized to be independent from the stimuli from other members of a group, as well as insight into the type of abilities that were normally regarded as determinants of temporary moods or underlying personality traits of strangers” educational and occupational success. These domains were the (p. 44). This definition points towards a number of aspects or ability to manage others and act wisely in relationships and repre- components of social intelligence, namely (1) getting along, (2) sented the essence of social intelligence. Although Thorndike social technique, (3) social knowledge, (4) social sensitivity, (5) was one of the pioneers of social insight, and (6) awareness of others’ moods and personalities. traditional intelligence test social intelligence one of three Last but not least, Gardner (1983) argued that “the capacity to development, his distinction facets of intelligence hypothesized know oneself and to know others is an inalienable part of the between “abstract” and by Thorndike (the others being human condition” (p. 243). Although he uses the labels inter- “social” intelligence would mechanical and abstract intelli- personal (knowing others) and intrapersonal (knowing oneself ), many decades later inspire gence) which he defined as the this definition has been largely applied to the notion of social researchers to look beyond ability to manage others and act intelligence. psychometric or traditional wisely in relationships – put simply, Unlike most intelligence experts, Gardner rarely attempted to intelligence tests. In fact, sev- the ability to get on with others validate social intelligence or any of the other abilities he concep- eral contemporary attempts tualizes psychometrically. Rather, Gardner based his theory of to identify novel abilities multiple
Recommended publications
  • Social Intelligence: a Needed Friend of School Administrators
    NATIONAL FORUM OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION JOURNAL VOLUME 36, NUMBER 4, 2018 Social Intelligence: A Needed Friend of School Administrators Dr. David E. Bartz, Professor Emeritus Department of Educational Leadership Eastern Illinois University Charleston, IL Dr. Lindsey Hall, Superintendent Mahomet-Seymour CUSD #3 Mahomet, IL Mrs. Sheila Greenwood, Superintendent Bement CUSD #5 Bement, Il Abstract Social intelligence skills are an excellent means for school administrators to establish positive relationships with individuals within their sphere of influence. These positive relationships can lead to others supporting the goals for which a school administrator is accountable and work toward their achievement. Ultimately, students are the benefactors of the use of social intelligence skills by school administrators through enhanced educational environments that improve student learning. Social awareness (what school administrators sense about others) and social facility (what they do behaviorally based on awareness) are the two holistic areas of social intelligence with skills such as: empathy, attunement, organizational awareness, influence, personal connection, development of others, organizing groups, teamwork, inspiration, social analysis, situational awareness, social expressiveness, presence, negotiating solutions, authenticity, clarity, social sensitivity, knowledge of social roles, rules, and scripts, and social control flowing from them. Keywords: social intelligence, school administrators, building relationships,
    [Show full text]
  • The Emotional and Social Intelligences of Effective Leadership
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0268-3946.htm The intelligences The emotional and social of effective intelligences of effective leadership leadership An emotional and social skill approach 169 Ronald E. Riggio and Rebecca J. Reichard Kravis Leadership Institute, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California, USA Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a framework for conceptualizing the role of emotional and social skills in effective leadership and management and provides preliminary suggestions for research and for the development of leader emotional and social skills. Design/methodology/approach – The paper generalizes a dyadic communications framework in order to describe the process of emotional and social exchanges between leaders and their followers. Findings – The paper shows how emotional skills and complementary social skills are essential for effective leadership through a literature review and discussion of ongoing research and a research agenda. Practical implications – Suggestions for the measurement and development of emotional and social skills for leaders and managers are offered. Originality/value – The work provides a framework for emotional and social skills in order to illustrate their role in leadership and their relationship to emotional and social intelligences. It outlines a research agenda and advances thinking of the role of developable emotional and social skills for managers. Keywords Emotional intelligence, Social skills, Leadership development Paper type Conceptual paper In his classic work on managerial skills, Mintzberg (1973) listed specific interpersonal skills (i.e. the ability to establish and maintain social networks; the ability to deal with subordinates; the ability to empathize with top-level leaders) as critical for managerial effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia
    Psychological Bulletin Copyright 1997 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 1997, Vol. 121. No 1, 114-132 0033-2909/97/J3.00 Social Cognition in Schizophrenia David L. Penn Patrick W. Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology University of Chicago Richard P. Bentall J. Meg Racenstein University of Liverpool Illinois Institute of Technology Leonard Newman University of Illinois at Chicago The study of social cognition in schizophrenia may augment the understanding of clinical and behavioral manifestations of the disorder. In this article, the authors describe social cognition and differentiate it from nonsocial cognition. They gamer evidence to support the role of social cognition in schizophrenia: Nonsocial information-processing models are limited to explain social dysfunction in schizophrenia, measures of social cognition may contribute greater variance to social functioning than measures of nonsocial cognition, task performance on nonsocial-cognitive measures may not parallel performance on social-cognitive tasks, and symptomatology may be best understood within a social-cognitive framework. They describe the potential implications of a social-cognitive model of schizophrenia for the etiology and development of the disorder. There appears to be a renewed interest in the psychological symptomatology of the disorder. We begin with a brief overview and phenomenal aspects of schizophrenia (Amador, Strauss, of the social-cognitive perspective, followed by a presentation Yale, & Gorman, 1991; Bentall, 1994; Brekke, Levin, Wolkon, of evidence that suggests that measures of social cognition con- Sobel, & Slade, 1993; Davidson & Strauss, 1992; Frith, 1994; tribute variance, beyond measures of nonsocial cognition, to Trower & Chadwick, 1995). These approaches emphasize the indices of the social functioning of patients with schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Theory This Course Will Cover the Fundamentals Of
    Learning Theory This course will cover the fundamentals of pedagogy and andragogy, as well as examine different theories in learning. We will analyze the particular characteristics of adult learning, identifying the contributions of theoretical and scientific support to andragogy, its principles and applications. Also we will evaluate the concept and importance of permanent or life-long education. Hopefully you will come away with a better sense of how humans learn and how you in particular can continue to learn. What is learning? Learning involves change. It is concerned with the acquisition of habits, knowledge, and attitudes. It enables the individual to make both personal and social adjustments. Since the concept of change is inherent in the concept of learning, any change in behavior implies that learning is taking place or has taken place. Learning that occurs during the process of change can be referred to as the learning process. Learning is a change in the individual, due to the interaction of that individual, and his environment, which fills a need to make him more capable of dealing adequately with his environment. A distinction is frequently made between education and learning. Education is an activity undertaken or initiated by one or more agents that is designed to effect changes in the knowledge, skill, and attitudes of individuals, groups, or communities. The term education emphasizes the educator, the agent of change who presents stimuli and reinforcement for learning and designs activities to induce change. The term learning, in contrast, emphasizes the person in whom the change occurs or is expected to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Administered Test of Social Intelligence 1
    SELF-ADMINISTERED TEST OF SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 1 The Social Shapes Test as a Self-Administered, Online Measure of Social Intelligence: Three Studies with Typically Developing Adults and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder Matt I. Brown1, Christopher F. Chabris1, & PatriCk R. HeCk1 1Geisinger Health System, Lewisburg, PA Running Head: SELF-ADMINISTERED TEST OF SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE Version 1 submitted for peer-review at the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29 July 2021. This paper has not been peer reviewed. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission *Address correspondence to: Matt I. Brown Geisinger Autism and Developmental MediCine Institute 120 Hamm Drive, Suite 2A, MC 60-36 Lewisburg, PA 17837 [email protected] Acknowledgments: We thank Lauren Walsh for her research assistance and Antoinette DiCrisCio, Cora Taylor, and Vanessa Troiani for their helpful feedbaCk on our manusCript. We also thank Jamie Toroney, Kiely Law, and the SPARK Consortium for their assistance in reCruiting partiCipants for this study. This work was supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health (grant U01MH119705). SELF-ADMINISTERED TEST OF SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE 2 AbstraCt The Social Shapes Test (SST) was designed as a measure of social intelligence, theory of mind, or mentalizing without using human faCes or relying on extensive verbal ability and is Completely self-administered online. Despite promising validity evidence, there have been no studies of whether this task is suitable for adults with autism speCtrum disorder (ASD). ACross three studies, we find that the SST is an equally reliable test for adults with ASD. We deteCt a modest difference in SST performance due to ASD and no evidence for differential item functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Creativity and Social Intelligence in Students of Allameh Tabatabai and Shahid Beheshti Universities
    Original Article Military Caring Sciences Volume 6, Issue 1, Spring 2019 (Serial Number: 19) The Relationship Between Creativity and Social Intelligence in Students of Allameh Tabatabai and Shahid Beheshti Universities Haji Agha Nejad. Y 1* Abstract Zareh Neyestanak. M 2 Introduction: Intelligence is one of the factors affecting students and their Dadashi. M 3 progress. In this regard, the attention to the nature of intelligence, especially social 1- (*Corresponding Author) intelligence, how to crystallize wise behaviors, assessment methods, measurements Ph.D. Student of Psychology, of intelligence and interpersonal and interpersonal differences have long been of Instructor, Imam Ali University, interest to everybody. Since the beginning of the 20th century, studies on the nature Tehran, Iran. Email: [email protected] of intelligence and intelligence capacity in children , adolescents and adults, and 2- Psychology, Ph.D. in Assistant using various tools to evaluate the level of intelligence in different countries had Professor, Azad University of been considered in many countries Nain, Azad University, Nain Branch, Nain, Iran. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between creativity 3- Ph.D. Student of Psychology, Instructor, Imam Ali University, and social intelligence among students of Allameh Tabatabai University and Shahid Tehran, Iran. Beheshti University. Material and Methods: The statistical population of this study was all students of Psychology and Education Faculty of studied universities of whom 300 people were selected using random sampling based on Morgan’s table. The measurement tools used in this research are the standard Randsip’s Creativity Questionnaire and the Kerry’s Social Intelligence Standard Questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Pavlov, Thorndike, and Skinner: Other Early Behaviorist Theories
    Supplementary reading in the Companion Website accompanying HUMAN LEARNING 5/E by J. E. Ormrod, 2008, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Copyright© 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. BEYOND PAVLOV, THORNDIKE, AND SKINNER: OTHER EARLY BEHAVIORIST THEORIES Chapters 3 and 4 in Human Learning describe the work of three prominent early behaviorists: Ivan Pavlov, Edward Thorndike, and B. F. Skinner. But other theorists had a significant impact on early behaviorist thinking as well. Here we’ll focus on three especially notable ones: John Watson, Edwin Guthrie, and Clark Hull. John Watson It was actually John Watson (1913) who introduced the term behaviorism and served as the most vocal advocate for the behaviorist perspective in the early part of the twentieth century. In his major writings, Watson (1914, 1916, 1919, 1925) adamantly called for the introduction of scientific objectivity and experimentation into the study of psychological phenomena. He emphasized the need for focusing scientific inquiry on observable behaviors rather than on such nonobservable phenomena as “thinking.” Not only did Watson oppose the study of internal mental events, but he also denied any existence of the mind at all! Thought, he proposed, was nothing more than tiny movements of the tongue and larynx and thus was a behavior just like any other. Greatly influenced by the work of both Pavlov and another Russian, Vladimir Bechterev (1913), Watson adopted the classically conditioned S-R habit as the basic unit of learning and extended it to human learning (e.g., see Watson and Rayner’s study with an infant named Albert, described in Chapter 3).1 Watson proposed two laws describing how such habits develop.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Main Theories on Acquisition and Development Del Language. 3.1 Learning Theories: Watson and Skinner Operant Conditioning B
    SEC 3 Page 1 of 9 3. MAIN THEORIES ON ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT DEL LANGUAGE. 3.1 LEARNING THEORIES: WATSON AND SKINNER OPERANT CONDITIONING By the 1920s John B. Watson had left academic psychology and other behaviorists were becoming influential, proposing new forms of learning other than classical conditioning. Perhaps the most important of these was Burrhus Frederic Skinner; Although, for obvious reasons he is more commonly known as B.F. Skinner. Skinner's views were slightly less extreme than those of Watson. Skinner believed that we do have such a thing as a mind, but that it is simply more productive to study observable behavior rather than internal mental events. Skinner believed that the best way to understand behavior is to look at the causes of an action and its consequences. He called this approach operant conditioning. Skinner's theory of operant conditioning was based on the work of Thorndike (1905). Edward Thorndike studied learning in animals using a puzzle box to propose the theory known as the 'Law of Effect'. BF Skinner: Operant Conditioning Skinner is regarded as the father of Operant Conditioning, but his work was based on Thorndike’s law of effect. Skinner introduced a new term into the Law of Effect - Reinforcement. Behavior which is reinforced tends to be repeated (i.e. strengthened); behavior which is not reinforced tends to die out-or be extinguished (i.e. weakened). Skinner (1948) studied operant conditioning by conducting experiments using animals which he placed in a “Skinner Box” which was similar to Thorndike’s puzzle box. B.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Peculiarities of Social Mental Abilities of Future Teachers
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 18,12629-12636 OPEN ACCESS Structural Peculiarities of Social Mental Abilities of Future Teachers Ardakh Rizabekovna Yermentayevaa,Kundyz Serikovna Kenzhebayevab,Akerke Nurlanbekovna Umirbekovac, Zhanat Kanashovna Aubakirovad, and Akmaral Bakytbekovna Iskakovad a N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University, KAZAKHSTAN, b The Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, KAZAKHSTAN, c Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, KAZAKHSTAN, d University Turan-Astana, KAZAKHSTAN, ABSTRACT The problem of social intelligence of researchers has attracted attention in recent years. Social intelligence is one of the most important characteristics of teachers. The aim of this research was to study features of structure of social intelligence of future teachers. The respondents in this study were selected 360 students of pedagogical specialties from Kyzylorda State University. The following tools are used in the work: methods of investigation of social intellect by J.P. Guilford and M.O. Sullivan. Results of theoretical and experimental studies have revealed general and specific features of social intelligence of future teachers. The results of research indicated that normative-role values accepted in society are significant for respondents; the students are guided by these values in situations of interpersonal interactions. Dynamics of parameters of social intelligence of respondents was performed. Gender features of social intelligence of future teachers were established. Differences which were related with professional specialization were not found. KEYWORDS ARTICLE HISTORY Teacher, social intelligence, interpersonal Received 11 April 2016 interaction, specialization, dynamics Revised 07 August 2016 Accepted 30 August 2016 Introduction There is a considerable amount of research of social structure of social intelligence for both children and adults.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Success Formula: Social Intelligence
    Piyushkumar K. Patel / International Journal for Research in Vol. 3, Issue:6, Oct.-Nov. : 2014 Education (IJRE) (Impact Factor 1.5), ICV: 6.30 (IJRE) ISSN: (P) 2347-5412 ISSN: (O) 2320-091X A New Success Formula: Social Intelligence PIYUSHKUMAR KANTILAL PATEL Research Scholar, Ganpat University, Ganpat Vidhyanagar, Kherva Gujarat (India) Abstract: When you are talking about intelligence, it features a lot of quick learning, immediate and accurate calculations and new solutions that come to mind. Socialisation is one of hard work on earth. However, all of us, we should prepare ourselves for the day. Almost all teens, or in fact all human beings, in a moment of your life when they feel lonely where everything seems strange and unfamiliar, are missing. Family members, friends, teachers' role in person’s character formation. The period considered. Storm and stress of adolescence as a period to be mentioned Adolescence. This article reviews the types of social intelligence. Keywords: Adolescence, Socialisation, Social intelligence 1. Introduction A human being is a complex thing. This is not because of his chemical compositions or his physical appearance but primarily because of the great range and variety of his behavior. Human can hear, see and feel things, he can move, lift and manipulate many kinds of objects, he can think and solve critical as well as complicated problems. And because he can think, he can understand his own behavior, because he deals with it everyday, both in himself and in other people. But it is quit evident that this degree of understanding of human behavior is not the same with every individual, it is varies from one person to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology: Behaviorism
    Psychology: Behaviorism Skill: Objectives: ​ ● Students will explain what constitutes Classical Conditioning, as well as describe the type of behavior for which this type of conditioning is suitable. ● Students will explain what constitutes Operant Conditioning, as well as describe the type of behavior for which this conditioning is suitable. ● Students will then compare and contrast Classical and Operant conditioning. Online Activity Have students look up and read about the experiments of Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and Edward Thorndike, and B.F. Skinner. Ask students to pay special attention to the differences between Classical (Pavlov and Watson) and Operant (Thorndike and Skinner) Conditioning. Online Websites that contain relevant articles include (or you can research your own): https://www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html https://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html https://www.verywellmind.com/classical-conditioning-2794859 https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-psychology/chapter/classical-conditioning/ https://www.verywellmind.com/operant-conditioning-a2-2794863 https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-psychology/chapter/operant-conditioning/ Online Activity 1 Complete the Following Questions: 1. What are the three steps to Classical Conditioning? 2. What type of behavior does Classical Conditioning address? 3. Describe Pavlov’s Experiment. 4. Describe Watson’s Experiment. 5. What are the steps to Operant Conditioning? 6. What were Thorndike’s Contributions to Operant Conditioning? 7. Describe Skinner’s Experiment. 8. Explain the difference between Primary and Secondary Reinforcers. 9. Describe the four different reinforcement schedules. 10. Compare and Contrast Classical and Operant Conditioning in paragraph form. Online Activity 2 Complete ONE of the following options: ● Draw a cartoon depicting the differences between positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical and Hands-On Behavioral Psychology in the Self-Contained Classroom Zachary Sanford, 2017 CTI Fellow William A
    Practical and Hands-on Behavioral Psychology in the Self-Contained Classroom Zachary Sanford, 2017 CTI Fellow William A. Hough High School This curriculum unit is recommended for: Teachers of high school self-contained Special Education classes and for teachers of general education high school psychology classes in order to provide laboratory experience. Keywords: Scientific Method, Informed Consent, Psychology, Behavioral Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Stimulus, Response, Behavior, Unconditioned Stimulus, Unconditioned Response, Conditioned Stimulus, Conditioned Response, Operant Conditioning, Positive Reinforcement, Negative Reinforcement, Positive Punishment, Negative Punishment, Extinction, Differential Reinforcement, Applied Behavioral Analysis, Social Learning Theory, Social Learning Teaching Standards: See Appendix 1 for teaching standards addressed in this unit. Synopsis: The focus of this unit is on behavioral psychology and creating hands on experiences for students with and without intellectual disabilities. This unit will provide a completed adapted chapter with picture symbols, adapted text, hands on experiences, adapted worksheets, and adapted assessment activities. The unit will begin with a brief summary and definitions of behavior, stimulus, psychology, and behaviorism. The students will have an opportunity to collect data on different stimuli during an activity. The unit will then provide information, videos, and hands on activities involving Classical Conditioning, Operant Conditioning, and Observational Learning. The students will also be provided with information about important research and the practitioners who helped to develop the major concepts and knowledge base of behavioral psychology. At the end of each section, the students will have the ability to demonstrate their learning by conducting hands on conditioning experiments. The students will be assessed using vignettes that will require students to apply their knowledge and understanding of the major concepts of behavioral psychology.
    [Show full text]