DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Bar Review Volume 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Bar Review Volume 25 THE BAR Volume 25 Number 6 REVIEWJournal of The Bar of Ireland December 2020 Costs and the “entirely successful” test CONTENTS The Bar Review 174 The Bar of Ireland Distillery Building 145-151 Church Street Dublin DO7 WDX8 Direct: +353 (0)1 817 5025 Fax: +353 (0)1 817 5150 Email: [email protected] Web: www.lawlibrary.ie EDITORIAL BOARD Editor Eilis Brennan SC Brian Kennedy SC Clíona Kimber SC Paul McGarry SC Sara Moorhead SC Sean O hUallacháin SC Peggy O’Rourke SC Susan Ahern BL Patricia Brazil BL Lydia Bunni BL Simon Donagh BL 170 167 Elizabeth Donovan BL Anita Finucane BL Tom Flynn BL Alison Walker BL 164 Ciara Murphy, CEO Vanessa Curley, Law Library Aedamair Gallagher, Senior Research and Policy Executive Tom Cullen, Publisher Paul O'Grady, Publisher Ann-Marie Hardiman, Think Media PUBLISHERS Published on behalf of The Bar of Ireland by Think Media Ltd Editorial: Ann-Marie Hardiman Paul O’Grady Colm Quinn Design: Tony Byrne Tom Cullen Niamh Short Advertising: Paul O’Grady Message from the Chair 154 Legal update xxxvii Commercial matters and news items relating to The Bar Review should be addressed to: Editor’s note 155 Paul O’Grady Law in practice 167 The Bar Review Think Media Ltd Costs and the “entirely successful” test: The Malthouse, News 155 Higgins v Irish Aviation Authority 167 537 NCR, Dublin DO1 R5X8 Tel: +353 (0)1 856 1166 PILA Pro Bono Pledge Ireland Clear contemplation 170 Fax: +353 (0)1 856 1169 Email: [email protected] Bar of Ireland Human Rights Award 2020 Opening the floodgates? 174 Web: www.thinkmedia.ie New to the Bar Interview 164 Closing argument 177 www.lawlibrary.ie Fighting the good fight Report on the Review of Administration of Civil Justice Views expressed by contributors or correspondents are not necessarily those of The Bar of Ireland or the publisher and neither The Bar of Ireland nor the publisher Papers, editorial items, and all queries regarding subscriptions should be addressed to: accept any responsibility for them. Aedamair Gallagher at: [email protected] THE BAR REVIEW : Volume 25; Number 6 – December 2020 153 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Working within restrictions The work of The Bar of Ireland in supporting members during the Covid-19 pandemic continues. I noted for colleagues in my message published in the November edition of The and demonstrated that the sustainability of practice is now a major concern. It has Bar Review that I would, in my capacity as Chair, prioritise lobbying and been decided to undertake a further survey to get updated insights on how we representation of the interests of our profession throughout the course of my are coping. I urge all members to respond to the survey, which should take less term and keep members informed. These last few weeks have presented ample than three minutes to complete, the results of which will assist in our opportunities to fulfil this priority! representations and are used by the Council to feed into its decision making on a range of matters. Level 5 restrictions The unexpected (or expected depending on your perspective) catapulting of our Education and training country into a level 5 lockdown for a six-week period had a significant impact on Members will be aware that the Legal Services Regulatory Authority (LSRA) the courts. Members will be aware of my endeavours to raise their concerns published a further report in November 2020 regarding the provision of legal arising from the reduction in the number of civil cases requiring witness testimony education and training for the profession. The report can be accessed at being listed or heard in Dublin during the restrictions. The President of the High https://www.lsra.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Section-34-ET-Final-Report- Court has provided a detailed and robust response to those concerns, and that to-Minister.pdf. Part 4 of the report sets out the conclusions and has assisted in providing an explanation to members regarding the approach to recommendations that the Authority considers appropriate to make in relation to that decision making. While we may agree or disagree with the varying the arrangements that should be in place for the provision of legal education and perspectives expressed, not unusual in our Bar of some 2,200 members, what is training, and also outlines the legislative and administrative reforms that are clear is that it is everyone’s intention to work co-operatively with all stakeholders required to facilitate these arrangements. The Authority recommends the – the judiciary, the Courts Service, solicitors and litigants – in maximising the safe introduction of an independent Legal Practitioners Education and Training re-opening and continued sitting of our courts. We must be prepared for the Committee (the LPET Committee), which will be responsible for setting and possibility that our country could be faced with further periods of level 5 maintaining the standards in the provision of legal education and training across lockdowns. We each have a responsibility to find ways to work with our clients all providers. It further recommends that a detailed competency framework be and the courts system to progress and maintain access to justice, and this may, by developed against which the standards of education and training of legal necessity, include changes in how we approach our own case management. practitioners can be benchmarked. The Education & Training Committee, under the leadership of Denise Brett SC, is actively reviewing the role of The Bar of Government Restart Grant Plus Ireland in the provision of CPD for members to ensure that it can align with the Adding further to the pressures being faced by our profession due to the future approach of the LSRA. The provision of CPD events by The Bar of Ireland Covid-19 challenges was the recent decision by Dublin City Council (DCC) to and Specialist Bar Associations continues to go from strength to strength. A total reject claims made by up to 500 members for the Restart Grant Plus scheme. The of 24 events have taken place since the new legal year commenced. I would like Council was shocked and dismayed by this surprising and disappointing to take this opportunity to record my appreciation to all those who are involved in development, and we were particularly concerned for those colleagues affected, making these highly valued events happen, particularly where I am aware of the who are predominantly members of our Junior Bar and young bar. Faced with this extensive work behind the scenes that is required for each such event. I would additional financial challenge, having been advised that they had successfully also add that the pivot to online has been remarkable, and this success is entirely applied and been approved for the grant, and in many cases having received the due to the hard work and dedication of our staff, who funds, they were then told of a u-turn, and some faced with the invidious continue to go above and beyond the call of duty. In situation of a demand for repayment. The Council immediately responded to this addition, the willingness of our many experts at the Bar to issue. We were informed that DCC was considering our correspondence, which set offer their time and share their insights with all Law out reasons why we believed its decision was both wrong and unlawful, and that Library members is very much appreciated. DCC was consulting with its legal advisors and the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. On December 9, DCC confirmed to the Council that “the Wishing you all a safe and peaceful Christmas break. appeals have been considered and the applications have been approved”. This was very positive news for all concerned. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all members and staff who worked intensively to secure this results. Member survey Maura McNally SC Members will recall that the Council undertook a member survey in May 2020, Chair, which revealed the stark reality of how Covid-19 has impacted on our profession Council of The Bar of Ireland 154 THE BAR REVIEW : Volume 25; Number 6 – December 2020 EDITOR’S NOTE Optimism and clarity As an extraordinary year ends, we look at recent case law, and new recommendations on the administration of civil justice. With several vaccines in the pipeline, there is cautious cause for optimism The working group established to conduct a comprehensive review of the as we wave goodbye to a year that has thrown up hitherto unimagined administration of civil justice has now completed its final report. In our challenges. Dr Mike Ryan has been knee-deep in the thick of those closing argument, we analyse the recommendations in that report and challenges. In a personal interview, he reveals the daily reality of fronting consider the proposed measures that are most likely to enhance access health emergencies at the World Health Organisation during a to justice for all. once-in-a-century global pandemic. The recent case of UCC v ESB has provided the factual backdrop for a Best wishes for a safe and happy Christmas. re-calibration by the Supreme Court of the principles governing liability in negligence at common law. Our author analyses the ramifications of this judgment and the circumstances in which public and private entities may now be found to have a duty of care to provide their neighbour with a benefit, as opposed to merely refraining from causing them harm. Liability in tort may now arise where a party exercises a special level of control over an independently arising danger. The Court of Appeal has helpfully considered the impact of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 on costs awards and how a Calderbank letter can affect such an award.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Affairs Ireland Newsletter
    PUBLIC AFFAIRS IRELAND NEWSLETTER ISSUE 333 November 3 2014 YOUR ESSENTIAL WEEKLY GUIDE TO LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY, AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS IN IRELAND Oireachtas Update In Dáil Éireann on Tuesday afternoon, there will be a motion re Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol. The Finance Bill 2014 is on the agenda for Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday in the Dáil. On Wednesday morning, Minister for Environment, Community & Local Government Alan Kelly TD will be in Seanad Éireann to discuss Irish Water. In the Joint Committee on Transport and Communications, the new national postcode system – Eircode – will be on the agenda on Wednesday morning. Civil Service Renewal Plan The Civil Service Renewal Plan, launched last Thursday 30 October by Taoiseach Enda Kenny, has announced a number of reforms of the civil service. Among the announced reforms is the streamlining of disciplinary procedures to make it easier to terminate under-performing civil servants. An independent expert group chaired by Professor Kevin Rafter from DCU made two key recommendations for civil service reform. One of the recommendations taken up and included in the Civil Service Renewal Plan is the establishment of an accountability board to enable oversight over all government departments and senior management. This board will be chaired by the Taoiseach. The expert panel’s recommendation for a head of the civil service to be appointed has been turned down by the Government. Furthermore, open recruitment for senior management positions in the civil service has been extended for all positions for Assistant Principals and above. The Plan also aims to open up the civil service to younger generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinn-Fein-NA-EES.Pdf
    Candidate Name Constituency Amount Assigned Total Expenditure on the candidate by the national agent € € 1. Micheal MacDonncha Dublin Bay North 5000 2.Denise Mitchell Dublin Bay North 5000 3.Chris Andrews Dublin Bay South 5000 450.33 4.Mary Lou McDonald Dublin Central 4000 5.Louise O’Reilly Dublin Fingal 8000 2449.33 6. Eoin O’Broin Dublin Mid West 3000 7. Dessie Ellis Dublin North West 3000 8.Cathleen Carney Boud Dublin North West 5000 9.Sorcha Nic Cormaic Dublin Rathdown 5000 10.Aengus Ó Snodaigh Dublin South 3000 Central 11.Màire Devine Dublin South 3000 Central 12. Sean Crowe Dublin South West 3000 13.Sarah Holland Dublin South West 5000 14.Paul Donnelly Dublin West 3000 69.50 15.Shane O’Brien Dun Laoghaire 5000 73.30 16.Caoimhghìn Ó Caoláin Cavan Monaghan 3000 129.45 17.Kathryn Reilly Cavan Monaghan 3000 192.20 18.Pearse Doherty Donegal 3000 19.Pádraig MacLochlainn Donegal 3000 20.Garry Doherty Donegal 3000 21.Annemarie Roche Galway East 5000 22.Trevor O’Clochartaigh Galway West 5000 73.30 23.Réada Cronin Kildare North 5000 24.Patricia Ryan Kildare South 5000 13.75 25.Brian Stanley Laois 3000 255.55 26.Paul Hogan Longford 5000 Westmeath 27.Gerry Adams Louth 3000 28.Imelda Munster Louth 10000 29.Rose Conway Walsh Mayo 10000 560.57 30.Darren O’Rourke Meath East 6000 31.Peadar Tòibìn Meath West 3000 247.57 32.Carol Nolan Offaly 4000 33.Claire Kerrane Roscommon Galway 5000 34.Martin Kenny Sligo Leitrim 3000 193.36 35.Chris MacManus Sligo Leitrim 5000 36.Kathleen Funchion Carlow Kilkenny 5000 37.Noeleen Moran Clare 5000 794.51 38.Pat Buckley Cork East 6000 202.75 39.Jonathan O’Brien Cork North Central 3000 109.95 40.Thomas Gould Cork North Central 5000 109.95 41.Nigel Dennehy Cork North West 5000 42.Donnchadh Cork South Central 3000 O’Laoghaire 43.Rachel McCarthy Cork south West 5000 101.64 44.Martin Ferris Kerry County 3000 188.62 45.Maurice Quinlivan Limerick City 3000 46.Seamus Browne Limerick City 5000 187.11 47.Seamus Morris Tipperary 6000 1428.49 48.David Cullinane Waterford 3000 565.94 49.Johnny Mythen Wexford 10000 50.John Brady Wicklow 5000 .
    [Show full text]
  • Oireachtas Monitor 214 Published: 4 July 2016
    Oireachtas Monitor 214 Published: 4 July 2016 1. Coming up this week in the Houses of the Oireachtas (4 July 2016 – 8 July 2016) Dáil and Seanad Agenda 2. Last week's Oireachtas Questions and Debates (27 June 2016 – 1 July 2016) a. Asylum and Immigration b. Education (incl ECCE and Child Care) c. Child Protection/ Child Services/ Children in Care d. Family e. Health and Wellbeing f. Disability and Special Educational Needs g. Child Benefit / Social Welfare/ Poverty / Housing h. Juvenile Justice/ Human Rights/ Equality a. Asylum and Immigration Parliamentary Questions- Written Answers Department of Justice and Equality Immigration Data, Paul Murphy (Dublin South West, Anti-Austerity Alliance) b. Education (incl ECCE and Child Care) Parliamentary Questions- Written Answers Department of Education and Skills Child Care Services Provision, Joan Burton (Dublin West, Labour) School Curriculum, Michael Healy-Rae (Kerry, Independent) School Transport Administration, Thomas Byrne (Meath East, Fianna Fail) Substance Abuse Prevention Education, Jack Chambers (Dublin West, Fianna Fail) Schools Mental Health Strategies, Jim Daly (Cork South West, Fine Gael) School Staff, Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael) School Patronage, Joan Burton (Dublin West, Labour) School Enrolments, Clare Daly (Dublin Fingal, United Left) Education Policy, Ruth Coppinger (Dublin West, Anti-Austerity Alliance) School Patronage, Maureen O'Sullivan (Dublin Central, Independent) Schools Recognition, Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael) Departmental Strategies,
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1010 Thursday, No. 6 15 July 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 15/07/2021A00100Ceisteanna - Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 868 15/07/2021A00200Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 868 15/07/2021A00250Common Agricultural Policy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 868 15/07/2021B00475Agriculture Industry � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 872 15/07/2021B01150Horticulture Sector � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 873 15/07/2021C00600Ceisteanna Eile - Other Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 876 15/07/2021C00700Aquaculture Industry � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 876 15/07/2021D00400Agriculture Industry � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 878 15/07/2021D01300Common Agricultural Policy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • 74 Dáil Éireann
    (Second Supplementary Order Paper) 74 DÁIL ÉIREANN Dé Máirt, 1 Nollaig, 2020 Tuesday, 1st December, 2020 2 p.m. GNÓ COMHALTAÍ PRÍOBHÁIDEACHA PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS Fógra i dtaobh Leasú ar Thairiscint: Notice of Amendment to Motion [Please note: there is a change to the text of the Sinn Féin motion highlighted in bold on today’s Second Supplementary Order Paper.] 109. “That Dáil Éireann: notes that: — in five weeks’ time the pension age is due to increase to 67 years of age on 1st January, 2021; — legislation needed to stop the pension age increasing to 67 in January has not passed through the House; — every worker in the State makes a considerable tax contribution throughout their working life and should have the right to retire at 65; — some workers want to retire at 65, while others want to remain at work, where they are able and willing to do so; — numerous employment contracts stipulate an end of employment date in line with when an employee turns 65; — since the abolition of the State Pension Transition payment, thousands of 65-year olds have had to sign on for a Jobseeker’s payment; — there are now over 4,000 65-year olds in receipt of either Jobseeker’s Allowance or Jobseeker’s Benefit; — there is a difference of €45.30 between the Jobseeker payments and the State Pension leading to an annual loss of €2,355.60; and — the pension age is scheduled in legislation to increase to 67 years in 2021, and 68 years in 2028; and calls on the Government to: — restore the State Pension Transition payment for those retiring at 65 years of age; — abolish mandatory retirement (with exceptions for security-related employment) to give workers the choice to work or retire so long as they are fit to do so; P.T.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE SLÁINTE (LEASÚ), 2020 HEALTH (AMENDMENT) BILL 2020 LEASUITHE COISTE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS [No. 42 of 2020] [22 October, 2020] DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE SLÁINTE (LEASÚ), 2020 —AN COISTE HEALTH (AMENDMENT) BILL 2020 —COMMITTEE STAGE Leasuithe Amendments SECTION 3 1. In page 4, line 36, after “Equality” to insert “and Dáil Éireann”. —Bríd Smith, Richard Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny. 2. In page 4, between lines 36 and 37, to insert the following: “(e) The Minister shall, before prescribing a fixed penalty provision in regulations under this section, recognising the emergency nature of these regulations, consult with and seek approval of a majority of the members of both Houses of the Oireachtas.”. —David Cullinane, Chris Andrews, John Brady, Martin Browne, Pat Buckley, Matt Carthy, Sorca Clarke, Rose Conway-Walsh, Réada Cronin, Seán Crowe, Pa Daly, Pearse Doherty, Paul Donnelly, Dessie Ellis, Mairéad Farrell, Kathleen Funchion, Thomas Gould, Johnny Guirke, Martin Kenny, Claire Kerrane, Pádraig Mac Lochlainn, Mary Lou McDonald, Denise Mitchell, Imelda Munster, Johnny Mythen, Eoin Ó Broin, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire, Ruairí Ó Murchú, Louise O'Reilly, Darren O'Rourke, Aengus Ó Snodaigh, Maurice Quinlivan, Patricia Ryan, Brian Stanley, Pauline Tully, Mark Ward, Violet-Anne Wynne. 3. In page 5, line 21, after “Equality” to insert “and Dáil Éireann”. —Bríd Smith, Richard Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny. [No. 42 of 2020] [22 October, 2020] [SECTION 3] 4. In page 5, between lines 21 and 22, to insert the following: “(d) The Minister shall, before prescribing a fixed penalty provision in regulations under this section, recognising the emergency nature of these regulations, consult with and seek approval of a majority of the members of both Houses of the Oireachtas.”.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE FÁN mBINSE UM CERVICALCHECK (LEASÚ), 2021 CERVICALCHECK TRIBUNAL (AMENDMENT) BILL 2021 LEASUITHE COISTE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS [No. 97 of 2021] [6 July, 2021] DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE FÁN mBINSE UM CERVICALCHECK (LEASÚ), 2021 —AN COISTE CERVICALCHECK TRIBUNAL (AMENDMENT) BILL 2021 —COMMITTEE Leasuithe Amendments SECTION 1 1. In page 3, between lines 8 and 9, to insert the following: “Amendment of section 11 of CervicalCheck Tribunal Act 2019 1. Section 11 of the CervicalCheck Tribunal Act 2019 is amended by the substitution of the following for subsection (2): “(2) Where a person has received an award (other than an award under the CervicalCheck non-disclosure ex-gratia scheme) from any court or settlement in respect of any action arising out of any circumstances which could give rise to a claim before the Tribunal or in the event of a recurrence, the person shall be entitled to be heard by the Tribunal and the Tribunal may determine whether any further award is warranted.”.”. —David Cullinane. 2. In page 3, between lines 8 and 9, to insert the following: “Amendment of section 2 of CervicalCheck Tribunal Act 2019 1. Section 2 of the CervicalCheck Tribunal Act 2019 is amended in the definition of “relevant woman”, in paragraph (b), by the insertion of the following: “(v) notwithstanding the above, any woman who had a screening history through CervicalCheck, whose slides have been found to be discordant and where such discordance may be the result of negligence, may apply to the Chair of the Tribunal who may consider if their application should proceed;”.”.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE FÁN NGNÍOMHAIREACHT UM FHORBAIRT TALÚN, 2021 LAND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BILL 2021 LEASUITHE COISTE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS [No. 11 of 2021] [24 May, 2021] DÁIL ÉIREANN AN BILLE FÁN nGNÍOMHAIREACHT UM FHORBAIRT TALÚN, 2021 —ROGHCHOISTE LAND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BILL 2021 —SELECT COMMITTEE Leasuithe Amendments SECTION 1 1. In page 8, line 4, to delete “Land Development Agency” and substitute “Active Land Management Agency”. —Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. SECTION 2 2. In page 8, line 11, after “of” to insert “public and affordable”. —Richard Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny, Paul Murphy, Bríd Smith, Mick Barry. 3. In page 8, line 11, after “of” to insert “social, affordable cost rental and affordable purchase”. —Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. 4. In page 8, line 12, to delete “and in particular affordable and social housing”. —Richard Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny, Paul Murphy, Bríd Smith, Mick Barry, Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. 5. In page 8, between lines 12 and 13, to insert the following: “(b) to provide land for the provision of Traveller specific accommodation,”. —Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. 6. In page 8, between lines 12 and 13, to insert the following: “(b) to provide land for the provision of accommodation for those in the asylum application process”. —Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. 7. In page 8, line 14, after “for” to insert “public”. —Richard Boyd Barrett, Gino Kenny, Paul Murphy, Bríd Smith, Mick Barry. 8. In page 8, line 14, after “for” to insert “social, affordable cost rental and affordable purchase”. —Eoin Ó Broin, Thomas Gould. [No. 11 of 2021] [24 May, 2021] [SECTION 2] 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël
    Lettre conjointe de 1.080 parlementaires de 25 pays européens aux gouvernements et dirigeants européens contre l'annexion de la Cisjordanie par Israël 23 juin 2020 Nous, parlementaires de toute l'Europe engagés en faveur d'un ordre mondial fonde ́ sur le droit international, partageons de vives inquietudeś concernant le plan du president́ Trump pour le conflit israeló -palestinien et la perspective d'une annexion israélienne du territoire de la Cisjordanie. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par le preć edent́ que cela creerait́ pour les relations internationales en geń eral.́ Depuis des decennies,́ l'Europe promeut une solution juste au conflit israeló -palestinien sous la forme d'une solution a ̀ deux Etats,́ conformement́ au droit international et aux resolutionś pertinentes du Conseil de securit́ e ́ des Nations unies. Malheureusement, le plan du president́ Trump s'ecarté des parametres̀ et des principes convenus au niveau international. Il favorise un controlê israelień permanent sur un territoire palestinien fragmente,́ laissant les Palestiniens sans souverainete ́ et donnant feu vert a ̀ Israel̈ pour annexer unilateralement́ des parties importantes de la Cisjordanie. Suivant la voie du plan Trump, la coalition israelienné recemment́ composeé stipule que le gouvernement peut aller de l'avant avec l'annexion des̀ le 1er juillet 2020. Cette decisioń sera fatale aux perspectives de paix israeló -palestinienne et remettra en question les normes les plus fondamentales qui guident les relations internationales, y compris la Charte des Nations unies. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par l'impact de l'annexion sur la vie des Israelienś et des Palestiniens ainsi que par son potentiel destabilisateuŕ dans la regioń aux portes de notre continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour: Working for Women
    Labour: Working for Women March 2021 Contents Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………. 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….………. 7. Foreword Alan Kelly: Leader of the Labour Party …………………………………………………….. 10. Ivana Bacik: Labour Party Seanad Group Leader ………………………………………….. 11. Women in the Labour Party 13. Labour Legislating for Equality …………………………………………………………….…… 14. Labour’s Vision for Women in Ireland: Policies for Change 1. Women’s Health Labour’s Action: Legislating for Women’s Health ……………………….…………………. 16. Labour’s Vision for Women’s Health …………………………………………………………. 16. 1.1. Cervical Cancer ………………………………………………………………………… 17. 1.2. Assisted Reproduction ……………………….……………………………………….. 18. 1.3. Gynaecological Services ………………………………………………………………. 18. 1.4. Provide for Free Contraception ………………………………………………………. 18. 1.5. Enhance Early Screening ………………………………..…………………………….. 19. 1.6. HPV Vaccine Catchup …………………………………………..……………………… 19. 1.7. Sexual Health ……………………………………………………………………………. 20. 1.8. Transgender Healthcare ………………………………………………………………… 20. 1.9. Abortion ………………………………….………………………………………………. 20. 1.10. Support for Survivors of the Mother and Baby Homes and Adopted Persons .… 20. 1.11. Fund Mental Health and Primary Care Centres ………………..…………………… 21. Labour: Working for Women 2. Workers’ Rights: Women at Work 22. Labour’s Action: Legislation for Women in the Workplace …………………………..……… 23. Labour’s Vision for Women in the Workplace 2.1. A New Childcare Model: Pay Every Childcare Worker a Living Wage ……………… 24. 2.2. Support for Carers ……………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Liffey Champion Tim Ryan, Oireachtas Reporter Gino Kenny Seeks Priority
    Liffey Champion Tim Ryan, Oireachtas Reporter Gino Kenny seeks priority for Bill to legalise medicinal cannabis Dublin Mid-West People Before Profit Deputy Gino Kenny told the Taoiseach that ten days ago he accompanied Vera Twomey on a trip to Barcelona to obtain medicinal cannabis for her daughter. However, on arrival at Dublin Airport, that medicine was taken from her even though she had a prescription. “I would say that medicine was taken from her illegally and she wants it back for the health of her daughter,” he said. “I appeal to the Taoiseach as a person and not as a politician. It is imperative that my Bill is given a date by the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health. Every week I get phone calls from people in pain who are not criminals, but are being treated like criminals. I ask the Taoiseach to give a date and give some hope to these people. They should not be treated like criminals but like citizens of this country trying to obtain medicinal cannabis. If the Taoiseach could give a date, it would be a really good legacy on his part.” In reply, the Taoiseach said obviously, on a number of occasions in the House the Minister for Health had dealt with the issuing of prescriptions and treatment for particular ailments. “Even if he were so willing he cannot under compassionate grounds issue an instruction for particular medicine to be distributed because it requires a prescription from an authorised clinical person,” he said. “I read the account of Deputy Gino Kenny's involvement in this.
    [Show full text]