DOCSLIB.ORG

Semi-Annual Report on the Implementation of the IPARD II Programme in the Republic of Serbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Semi-Annual Report on the Implementation of the IPARD II Programme in the Republic of Serbia THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND WATER MANAGEMENT SECTOR FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (Managing Authority) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IPARD II PROGRAMME IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA The Seventh session of the IPARD II Monitoring Committee Belgrade, September 2020 Table of Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 Entrustment of budget implementation tasks for Measure 7 and Measure 9 .................................. 8 The proposal for the IPARD II Programme modifications ............................................................. 8 Adopted Legal Documents ............................................................................................................. 9 Trainings and Projects..................................................................................................................... 9 Implementation of the IPARD II measures .............................................................................. 11 Measure 1 .................................................................................................................................. 14 Measure 3 .................................................................................................................................. 22 Regions and administrative districts ......................................................................................... 28 Measure 1 .................................................................................................................................. 28 Measure 3 .................................................................................................................................. 31 The structure of submitted applications per gender, type and age of applicants ................. 35 Promotional activities and visibility .......................................................................................... 42 Indicators for visibility and communication activity ............................................................... 44 LIST OF GRAPHS Graph 1: The total number of submitted applications (Measure 1 and Measure 3) ..................... 11 Graph 2: The total requested expenditures and expenditures per measures ................................. 11 Graph 3: Approved and paid applications in relation to submitted application for Measure 1 and Measure 3 (%) ............................................................................................................................... 13 Graph 4: Support in relation with the allocated budget amount (%), Measure 1 ......................... 14 Graph 5: The total number of submitted application for Measure 1 per calls .............................. 14 Graph 6: The total amount of expenditures and expenditures per calls for Measure 1 (EUR) ..... 15 Graph 7: Progress in relation to approved and paid public support for Measure 1 ...................... 16 Graph 8: Structure of submitted applications for Measure 1 per sector ....................................... 16 Graph 9: Structure of the total amount of eligible expenditures for Measure 1 per sector ........... 16 Graph 10: The number of submitted, approved and paid applications for Measure 1 per sector and sub-sector ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Graph 11: The total eligible expenditures for Measure 1 per sector and sub-sector (000 EUR) .. 18 Graph 12: The share of particular sectors in the total approved applications and eligible expenditures for Measure 1 (%) .................................................................................................... 19 Graph 13: The share of particular group of investments in the total number of submitted application for Measure 1 ................................................................................................................................ 20 Graph 14: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 1 per group of investment .. 20 Graph 15: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 1 per type of investment .... 21 Graph 16: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 3 ......................................... 22 Graph 17: Total expenditures and expenditures per Public Call for Measure 3 ........................... 22 Graph 18: The total number of submitted, approved and paid applications for Measure 3 ......... 22 Graph 19: The structure of submitted applications for Measure 3 per sector ............................... 23 Graph 20: The structure of eligible expenditures for approved applications for Measure 3 per sector ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Graph 21: The number of submitted applications for Measure 3 per sector and sub-sector ........ 24 Graph 22: The total amount of eligible expenditures for approved and paid applications for Measure 3 per sector (000 EUR) .................................................................................................. 25 Graph 23: The share of particular sectors in the total number of submitted applications and approved expenditures for investment for Measure 3 (%) ............................................................ 25 Graph 24: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 3 per type of investment .... 26 Graph 25: The total approved eligible expenditures for Measure 3 per type of investment ........ 26 Graph 26: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 1 per region ........................ 28 Graph 27: The total amount of expenditures for Measure 1 per region (EUR) ............................ 28 Graph 28: The structure of submitted applications for Measure 1 per region (%) ....................... 29 Graph 29: The structure of total expenditures for Measure 1 per region (%) ............................... 29 Graph 30: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 1 per administrative district 29 Graph 31: The total amount of expenditures for Measure 1 per administrative district (EUR) ... 30 Graph 32: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 3 per region ........................ 31 Graph 33: The total amount of expenditures for Measure 3 per region (EUR) ............................ 32 Graph 34: The structure of submitted applications for Measure 3 per region (%) ....................... 32 Graph 35: The structure of the total amount of expenditures for Measure 3 per region (%) ....... 32 Graph 36: The total number of submitted applications for Measure 3 per administrative district 33 Graph 37: The total amount of expenditures for Measure 3 per administrative district (EUR) ... 34 Graph 38: The number of the submitted applications per gender and public calls ....................... 35 Graph 39: The total amount of requested expenditures for Measure 1 per gender (EUR) ........... 36 Graph 40: Submitted, approved, rejected and paid applications by women for Measure 1 ......... 36 Graph 41: Submitted, approved, paid and rejected applications for Measure 1 per type of recipients (%)................................................................................................................................................. 37 Graph 42: Submitted, approved, paid and rejected applications for Measure 3 per type of recipients (%)................................................................................................................................................. 38 Graph 43: The structure of expenditures for Measure 1 per type of recipients (%) ..................... 38 Graph 44: The structure of requested expenditures for Measure 3 per type of recipients (%) ..... 39 Graph 45: The number of applications submitted by young farmers ........................................... 40 Graph 46: The share of the young farmers in submitted applications for Measure 1 per public calls ....................................................................................................................................................... 40 Graph 47: Submitted, approved and rejected applications by young farmers for Measure 1 per public calls .................................................................................................................................... 41 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: AAS Central Serbia ........................................................................................................ 43 Table 2: AAS AP of Vojvodina .................................................................................................... 43 Table 3:Indicator for visibility and communication activity ........................................................ 44 LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1: Common Indicator Tables for Monitoring and Evaluation of IPA Rural Development Programmes 2014-2020 Annex 2: Additional documents for submission to the Managing Authority Annex 3: Sensitive categories and type of recipients LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AAS – Agricultural Advisory Services AP – Autonomous Province DAP – Directorate for Agrarian Payments ЕC – European Commission ЕU – European Union IА – IPARD Agency IPARD – Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance in Rural Development MAFWM – Ministry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WWF Adria Implements the Project: Protected Areas for Nature And
    Protected Areas for Nature and People – NP Durmitor, Montenegro © Martin Šolar, WWF Adria FACTSHEET 2016 WWF ADRIA IMPLEMENTS THE PROJECT: Protected Areas for Project Title: Nature and People Protected Areas for Nature and People, PA4NP The purpose of the project “Protected Areas for Nature and People”, implemented by WWF Adria since October 2015, is sustainable use of natural resources in the Region: Albania, Bosnia Dinaric Arc region as a foundation for the socio-economic development. To that and Herzegovina, Croatia, end, WWF, together with its partners, will strive to achieve the following targets: Kosovo*, Macedonia, • To introduce examples of how protected areas can generate social Montenegro, Slovenia and economic benefits in cooperation with the local community, and Serbia • To improve cooperation between the protected areas Duration: and the local community in the entire region, October 2015 – • To enhance cooperation between WWF and its partners on the one October 2019 side and decision-makers and those who have impact on them on the other side at the national level. Donor and Value: Swedish International Development WWF will use the examples of socio-economic benefits of well-managed parks, as Cooperation Agency (Sida), well as argumentation and information required for decision-making to encourage 4,200,000 EUR decision-makers from 8 countries in the region to deliver on their promises made under the “Big Win for Dinaric Arc”, a document they adopted in 2013. This is WWF’s contribution with the aim of achieving the targets
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Characteristics of Market Production of Fruit and Grapes in Serbia
    REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2018 UDC: 913:[346.54:641.13+634.8.076](497.11) doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801201S REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA1 Simo Stevanović2, Snežana Stevanović 3, Svjetlana Janković-Šoja4 Summary In the paper analyzes the trends in the development of market production of fruit (on the example of the apple and the plum) and grapes in Serbia from 1976 to 2015. The grouping of the Serbian districts according to the degree of the market production of fruit and grapes in 2015 was performed by a cluster analysis, on the basis of the six features of production, five features of the capacities, and five features of development. According to the data for 2015, the degree of the marketability of apples in Serbia was 47.7%, plums 15.9%, and grapes 18.3%. The Serbia-North Region shows a surplus in the production of apples, and a deficit in the production of plums (-181.7%) and grapes (-99.1%). The Serbia-South Region has a surplus in the production of the analyzed kinds of fruit (the apple accounting for 43.0%, and the plum 50.9%) and grapes (45.2%). Keywords: market production of fruit, economic development, I-distance, cluster analysis JEL: Q-13, O-11 Introduction Serbia is a traditionally significant producer of all kinds of continental fruit and grapes. Given the commercial, technological and nutritive characteristics of fruit production, 1 The paper is part of the research conducted on the “Serbia’s Rural Labor Market and Rural Economy – Income Diversification and Poverty Reduction” Project, No.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Functional Transformation and Typology of the Settlement System of Toplica District
    UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho7-15574 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2017, pp. 47-51. Original Scientific Paper SPATIAL FUNCTIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND TYPOLOGY OF THE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM OF TOPLICA DISTRICT JOVAN DRAGOJLOVIĆ1, DUŠAN RISTIĆ2, NIKOLA MILENTIJEVIĆ1 1Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 2Fakulty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Contemporary processes of industralization, urbanization, deagrarianization, the polarization and globalization contribute socio-economic transformation of the observed space as well as the creation of new carrier of functional relationships in space. Towns with its own influences enrich the network of surrounding settlements, strengthen their mutual relations and create a whole functional settlement system of one area , or the gravity of the urban core. By dividing the functions of the primary, secondary and tertiary, the basis and types of settlements are created by functional criteria according to the type of economic activity and the primary content in them. In this area in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century witnessed substantial changes in almost all components of demographic structure, which resulted in the transformation of functional types of settlement, when the predominantly agrarian settlement characteristic of the area of Toplica road went up mixed and service settlement. The idea behind the study is for the geographically complex area to be displayed in the light of socio- economic development, and as a basis for further economic development of this part of the Republic of Serbia. Keyword: urbanization, rural settlements, urban settlements, functions, typology, sustainable development, District of Toplica municipality with an area of 759 km2 (34.0%), Blace 2 INTRODUCTION municipality has an area of 306 km (13.7%), and lowest per surface is the territory of the municipality of Žitoradja 214 km2 Toplica district is located in the southern part of the (9.6%).
    [Show full text]
  • Tourists Manifestations in the Development of Culinary Tourism in Banat (Vojvodina, Serbia)
    TOURISTS MANIFESTATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULINARY TOURISM IN BANAT (VOJVODINA, SERBIA) Bojana KALENJUK 1, Dragan TEŠANOVIĆ 1, Snježana GAGIĆ2, Nikola VUKSANOVIĆ 1, Marija ŠKRINJAR3, 1University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad, Serbia 2University of Alfa, College of professional studies in management and business communication, Sremski Karlovci, Serbia 3 University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Food Technology, Novi Sad, Serbia E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Abstract: Vojvodina has a large number of tourist manifestations of food and drinks which attract many domestic and foreign tourists. Tourist manifestations represent an integral part of gastronomic tourism, which is defined as the tourist visit of primary or secondary food producers, restaurants for producing and serving food and certain destinations for tasting and experiencing the regional specialties, where food and drink are primary motivation for travel. Recognizing the importance of tourist manifestations in the development of tourism this manuscript has a task to investigate the tourist manifestations in the territory of Banat, in order to determine the most frequent types of events in districts (Kikinda - Northern Banat District, Zrenjanin – Middle Banat district and Pancevo - South Banat District) and period of taking place of events. The research will include analysis of food and drink events in 2011. Keywords: tourist events, manifestation, food, beverage, culinary tourism, Vojvodina, Banat. 1. INTRODUCTION Tourist manifestations contribute greatly to the formation of the destinations image, increasing the cohesion of the local community and its pride, and improving their quality of life (Bjeljac et al., 2003; Bjeljac, Ž., 2004; Hadžić, O., Bjeljac, Ž., 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA BIANCO 1 2014.Qxp
    ACTA ENTOMO LOGICA SL OVENICA LJUBLJANA, JUNIJ 2019 Vol. 27, øt. 1: 17 –29 Fauna oF the brown lacewings oF serbia (insecta: neuroptera: hemerobiidae) Jan Podlesnik 1, Predrag Jakšić 2, ana nahirnić 3, Franc Janžekovič 1, Tina klenovšek 1, vesna klokočovnik 1, dušan deveTak 1 1department of Biology, Faculty of natural sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, slovenia; e-mail: [email protected] 2čingrijina 14/25, Zvezdara, 11000 Beograd, serbia 3national Museum of natural history, Bulgarian academy of sciences, Tsar osvoboditel Blvd 1, 1000 sofia, Bulgaria abstract - The hemerobiid fauna of serbia was studied during two collecting trips in the years 2015 and 2016. Prior to the present study the hemerobiids in this Balkan country were insufficiently explored. according to literature data and collected ma - terial, twenty-three species are listed for the country, of which six are recorded for the first time for serbia. key words : hemerobiid fauna, lacewings, Balkan Peninsula izvleček - Favna rJavih MrežekrilCev rePUBlike srBiJe (inseCTa: neUroPTera: heMeroBiidae) Tekom dveh terenskih odprav v srbijo smo v letih 2015 in 2016 raziskovali favno rjavih mrežekrilcev. Pred aktualno raziskavo so bili hemerobiidi tega območja zelo slabo poznani. Po analizi literaturnih podatkov in nabranega materiala predstavljamo seznam 23 vrst za republiko srbijo, od katerih je šest novih najdb za to balkansko državo. klJUčne Besede : favna hemerobiidov, mrežekrilci, balkanski polotok introduction hemerobiidae is one of the largest families of the order neuroptera. it contains more than 550 known species of small to medium sized insects, distributed all around 17 Acta entomologica slovenica, 27 (1), 2019 the world (Monserrat 1990, oswald 1993, aspöck et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in LESKOVAC 143 7 503 22 13
    Invest in LESKOVAC Located at Pan-European Corridor X in the CITY ID south of Serbia, City of Leskovac holds favorable geo-strategic position for duty free CITY OF LESKOVAC, SERBIA exports to various European markets. Large number of highly qualified workforce and Area 1.025 km²; 37% arable land, 27% forests, 36% roads and other young professionals live and work in the Population 144.206 region, representing exceptional intellectual Number of businesses 958 companies, 3.268 entrepreneurs potential. The region is well known for its Key industries Food, textile, wood, chemical industry great wealth in natural resources: land, water, mineral wealth, forests, and organic City budget (EUR) 29.651.652 EUR; capital investments 11,26% agriculture potential. Major production se- Contact Pana Đukića 9-11, 16 000 Leskovac, Serbia, +381 16 200 804, Berlin ctors in the food industry include fruit, vege- [email protected], [email protected] table and meat processing. Total number of companies and entrepreneurs in the sector is 189. Annual crop yield is 356.246 tons, in Munich addition to vegetable yields and fruit pro- Budapest Vienna duction of 156.892 and 212.401 tons respe- ctively. In order to promote investments and exports in agriculture and fruit-processing Zagreb Belgrade industry, the City of Leskovac has developed Milan new industrial “Green Zone” covering the Sarajevo Leskovac area of 971.500 m² just 4 km from the city Sofia Istanbul center in the vicinity of E75 Highway. Being Skopje certified as business-friendly municipality, Thessaloniki Leskovac provides high quality service and support to investors interested to develop their business in South East Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of the Republic of Serbia to the Habitat Iii Conference
    NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE HABITAT III CONFERENCE BELGRADE, SEPTEMBER 2016 0 MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCTION, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Minister prof. Dr. Zorana Mihajlović Department for housing and architectural policies, public utilities and energy efficiency Deputy Minister Jovanka Atanacković Working team of the Ministry: Svetlana Ristić, B.Sc. Architecture Božana Lukić, B.Sc. Architecture Tijana Zivanovic, MSc. Spatial Planning Siniša Trkulja, PhD Spatial Planning Predrag I. Kovačević, MSc. Demography Nebojša Antešević, MSc. Architecture Assistance provided by the working team of the Professional Service of the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities: Klara Danilović Slađana Grujić Dunja Naić Novak Gajić Aleksandar Marinković Rozeta Aleksov Miodrag Gluščević Ljubinka Kaluđerović Maja Stojanović Kerić The report was prepared for the UN Conference on Settlements Habitat III in Serbian and English language 1 CONTENT I Urban Demography ................................................................................................................... 4 1. Managing rapid urbanization ............................................................................................. 4 2. Managing rural-urban linkages .......................................................................................... 6 3. Addressing urban youth needs ........................................................................................... 7 4. Responding to the needs of the aged .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract the Development of Tourism A
    TOURISM IN FUNCTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Tourism as a Generator of Employment (TISC 2019) – Thematic proceedings II DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM AND LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Jovan Rudež 1; Sr đan Drobnjak 2; Abstract The development of tourism and tourist destinations, especially in certain regions of Serbia, depends on the increase of social capital of the destinations. It applies particularly if the goal is to enter the international market, that is to attract foreign guests in a way which is in accordance with the local community development programme. This article has analyzed the way how to enlarge social capital with the aim to attract foreign tourist and then to test the integrative model iModel which is based on systematic thinking. Next, the relationship between systematic thinking, tourism and social capital has been discussed. The research has been done on Podunavlje District, whose market can be the regional countries and some developed countries such as Germany and Austria as well. The capacities can be enforced by enlarging social capital which needs the help of all the participants at the destination. This study is also based on the analysis of the application of local economic development programme (LED) related to the destination of Smederevska Palanka and Podunavlje District. Key Words: tourist destination, social capital, international market entrance, local development, model JEL classification: Z32, O15, R11 Introduction Tourism, as an extensive and prosperous branch of economy, still does not have an appropriate place in the economy development in Serbia and largely depends on the increase of social capital of the particular destinations (such as, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Europe As Semi-Border and Semi-Urban Region and Its Marketisation
    CENTRAL EUROPE AS SEMI-BORDER AND SEMI-URBAN REGION AND ITS MARKETISATION JAN SUCHÁČEK Introduction or Brief Description of Central Europe The notion of ‘Central Europe’ has traditionally attracted much attention. Numerous issues connected with this enormously complex and appealing region go beyond the extent of this article; however, it should be stated that, as defi ned by Milan Kundera, the area was “geographically in the Centre, culturally in the West, and politically in the East”1. Various cultural and political streams, often almost antagonistic but at the same time intensely interconnected, have shaped the character of this territory. Before 1989, political arguments that stressed the absurdity of two separate Europes were prevailing in the context of the idea of a Central Europe. Since 1989, one has been able to observe the slow return of common pluralistic values so typical of Central European culture. Over the past years we have witnessed the rebirth of the idea of Central European partnership, which can be perceived as a process of positioning in the context of EU enlargement. The region of Central Europe2 is currently infl uenced by two relevant processes. The fi rst one is a spontaneous process of economic and social restructuring. It involves the whole Central European space. The second is a specifi c process of transition in Central Eastern Europe that includes a major part of Central Europe. The problem of the transitional part of Central Europe consists mainly in the discrepancy between formal and informal institutions3 1 Tomaszewski, A.: Central Europe: Cultural Property and Cultural Heritage, In: Central Europe: A New Dimension of Heritage, ICC, Cracow, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Europe European Landscape Convention
    COUNCIL OF EUROPE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION National Workshop on the implementation of the European Landscape Convention in Bosnia and Herzegovina Drawing landscape policies for the future Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina 25-26 January 2018 SESSION 1 SERBIA Mrs Jasminka LUKOVIC JAGLICIC Director Advisor, Regional Economic Development Agency, Sumadija and Pomoravlje The role of the Regional Economic Development Agency for Sumadija and Pomoravlje in the process of the implementation of the European Landscape Convention at regional and local level The Regional Economic Development Agency for Sumadija and Pomoravlje was founded in 2002 as the partnership between public, civil and private sectors, with the purpose of planning and management of equal territorial development. The Law on Regional Development (adopted in July 2009, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 51/2009, 30/2010 and 89/2015) defined the competence and area of intervention of regional development agencies for planning of development processes at regional level, applying the principles of broad stakeholder participation, inter-municipal and cross-sector approach in identifying problems and measures to address them. REDASP consistently applies these principles in its work on the one hand and has the ratification of the European Landscape Convention on the other hand. Thus the Republic of Serbia has recognised the landscape as an essential component of the human environment and agreed to 1). establish and implement a set of policies aimed at the protection, management and planning of the area and 2). to establish procedures for involvement of the wider public, local and regional authorities, as well as other landscape policy stakeholders.
    [Show full text]