DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Notice with Attachments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Notice with Attachments DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32232-0019 October 24, 2018 CESAJ-RD-NC PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Application No. SAJ-2018-03098(SP-AWP) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) as described below: APPLICANT: Cypress Bay Farms, LLC Attn: Ben Jefferies 235 West Drive Melbourne, Florida 32904 WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States associated with the Sebastian River. The project area is located at 9145 Babcock Street, in Section 3, Township 30 South, Range 37 East, Palm Bay, Brevard County, Florida. Directions to the site are as follows: From the intersection of Malabar Road and Babcock Street proceed south on Babcock Street for approximately 6.5 miles. The project site is on the east side of the road at 9145 Babcock Street. APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES: Latitude 27.9014° Longitude -80.6166° PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: Commercial and Residential Development Overall: To develop a multi-use development, which includes single-family homes, multi-family homes, and commercial/retail, near Palm Bay Parkway in Palm Bay, Florida, to meet local demand for this type of development. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The 214.15 acre project area currently supports eight (8) land use types/vegetative communities. These land use types/vegetative communities were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCCS, FDOT, January 1999). Jurisdictional wetland and other water communities within the project area comprise approximately 54.65 acres and consist of surface waters - 510, Reservoirs - 530, Wetland Forested Mixed - 630, and Wet Prairies - 643. The on-site upland land use types/vegetative communities comprise approximately 146.73 acres and consist of Agriculture – 200, Pine Flatwoods - 411, Other Pines - 419, Xeric Oak - 421 and Hardwoods-Coniferous Mix - 434. Four (4) Corps jurisdictional wetlands totaling 1.77 acres are located within the project boundary (Wetlands 1, 6, 7, and 9). Only Wetland 1 (+0.30 acres) is proposed for impact. Wetlands 6, 7, and 9 are to be preserved along with the upland buffers. Wetland 1 is a wet prairie that is mowed on a regular basis, supports cattle grazing, and is dominated by blue maidencane, torpedograss, beakrush, sedges, capeweed, redroot, and yellow-eyed grass. Wetlands 6, 7, and 9 support a mixture of herbaceous and shrubby vegetation including sawgrass, chalky bluestem, chain fern, swamp fern, black rush, red root, with lesser amounts of wax myrtle, Carolina willow, swamp bay, and dahoon holly. Both Wetlands 7 and 9 are directly connected to off-site wetlands that extend northward and tie into a large slough system. Jurisdictional surface waters consisting of irrigation swales and ditches total 9.49 acres are spread across the site. The ditches were excavated wholly in uplands for agricultural purposes but also hydrologically connect wetlands to waters of the United States. The swales were likely excavated for bedding material used in the abandon citrus and palm operations. The swales/ditches can range from flooded to intermittently wet. Almost half of ditches (4.6 acres) are not maintained and do not contain suitable foraging habitat for the wood stork. Surface water number 9, totaling 4.89 acres, occurs in the central portion of the site and conveys water in an east to west direction discharging into the ditch on the east side of Babcock Street. This surface water contains suitable foraging habitat for the wood stork and the applicant has proposed compensatory mitigation. There are four (4) isolated wetlands, totaling 3.42 acres, located within the project boundary (Wetland 2 = 1.2 Acres; Wetland 3 = 1.87 acres; Wetland 4 = 0.31 acres; and Wetland 8 = 0.04). Wetlands 2,3,4, and 8 are surrounded by upland vegetation and do not have any physical, chemical, or biological connections to waters of the United States. Given the absence of factual determination of subsurface flow, or a substantial nexus to commerce, these wetlands were determined to be isolated consistent with SWANCC and the "Migratory Bird Rule''. There are 9.35 acres of non-jurisdictional surface waters located within the project boundary. The surface waters include swales and ditches which were excavated entirely within uplands and do not convey water to waters of the United States. An abandon borrow pit totaling 43.4 acres occurs in the north boundary of the site. The banks of the pit are routinely mowed and the littoral edges are sparsely vegetated. The applicant has conceded jurisdiction of the borrow pit. PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks authorization to dredge and fill 0.3 acre of jurisdictional wetlands and 9.52 acres of jurisdictional surface waters for the construction of a multi-use development, which includes single-family homes, multi- family homes, commercial/retail, roads, and surface water management systems. 2 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION – The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: “A total of 1.77 acres of USACE jurisdictional wetlands exist on the subject site. Of this wetland acreage, 0.3 acres of the lowest quality wetlands are proposed for impact while the other 1.47 acres of higher quality wetlands would be avoided and surrounded by upland buffers.” COMPENSATORY MITIGATION – The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment: The applicant has provided the following explanation why compensatory mitigation should not be required: The applicant proposes to purchase federal credits from the federally approved Lake Washington Mitigation Bank. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is not aware of any known historic properties within the permit area. By copy of this public notice, the Corps is providing information for review. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts is subject to review by and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer and those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The action area includes the entire 214.15 acre project site. The project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS) Consultation Area for the eastern indigo snake, wood stork, Florida scrub-jay, Audubon’s crested caracara, grasshopper sparrow, Everglades snail kite and red cockaded woodpecker. The project site does not contain habitat suitable for grasshopper sparrow, Everglades snail kite, or red cockaded woodpecker. The Corps has determined the proposed work would have no effect to the grasshopper sparrow, Everglades snail kite, or red cockaded woodpecker. The site contains suitable habitat for the Florida scrub jay. The applicant has completed scrub jay surveys and none were observed. The applicant coordinated with the FWS via separate letter and the FWS concurred no scrub jays occur within the project boundaries. The Corps has determined the proposed action would have no effect to the Florida scrub jay. The Corps completed an evaluation of the project based upon the August 13, 2013, updated addendum to the January 2010 North and South Florida Ecological Services Field Offices Programmatic Concurrence for use with the Eastern Indigo Snake. Use of the Key for the Eastern Indigo Snake resulted in the following sequential determination: A (The project is not located in open water or salt marsh.) >B (The permit will be conditioned for use of the Service’s standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo snake during site preparation and protection construction.) >C (There are gopher tortoise burrows, holes, cavities, or other refugia where a snake could be buried or trapped and injured during project activities.) > D (The project will impact less than 25 acres of xeric habitat supporting less than 25 active and inactive gopher tortoise burrows) = Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) with the applicant adherence to the 3 standard protection measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake. Based upon the NLAA determination for the Eastern Indigo Snake no further coordination is required. The Corps completed an evaluation of the project based upon the September 2008, North and Central Peninsular Florida Ecological Services Field Offices Programmatic Concurrence for use with the Wood Stork. Use of the Key for the Wood Stork resulted in the following sequential determination: A (Project is more than 2500 feet from a colony site.) > B (Project impacts SFH) >C (Impacts to SFH are greater than 0.5 acres) >D (Project impacts to SFH are within a Core Foraging Area.) >E (Project provides SFH compensation within the Service Area of a Service-approved wetland mitigation bank.) = NLAA. Based upon the NLAA determination for the Wood Stork no further coordination is required. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): The proposed work would have no effect to EFH. NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has been verified by Corps personnel. AUTHORIZATION FROM OTHER AGENCIES: Water Quality Certification may be required from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and/or one of the state Water Management Districts. COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Cocoa Permits Section, 400 High Point Drive, Suite 600, Cocoa, Florida 32926 within 21 days from the date of this notice. The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019
    FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MARINE MAMMAL PATHOBIOLOGY LABORATORY 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019 County Date Field ID Sex Size Waterway City Probable Cause (cm) Nassau 01/01/2019 MNE19001 M 275 Nassau River Yulee Natural: Cold Stress Hillsborough 01/01/2019 MNW19001 M 221 Hillsborough Bay Apollo Beach Natural: Cold Stress Monroe 01/01/2019 MSW19001 M 275 Florida Bay Flamingo Undetermined: Other Lee 01/01/2019 MSW19002 M 170 Caloosahatchee River North Fort Myers Verified: Not Recovered Manatee 01/02/2019 MNW19002 M 213 Braden River Bradenton Natural: Cold Stress Putnam 01/03/2019 MNE19002 M 175 Lake Ocklawaha Palatka Undetermined: Too Decomposed Broward 01/03/2019 MSE19001 M 246 North Fork New River Fort Lauderdale Natural: Cold Stress Volusia 01/04/2019 MEC19002 U 275 Mosquito Lagoon Oak Hill Undetermined: Too Decomposed St. Lucie 01/04/2019 MSE19002 F 226 Indian River Fort Pierce Natural: Cold Stress Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19003 F 264 Whiskey Creek Fort Myers Human Related: Watercraft Collision Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19004 F 285 Mullock Creek Fort Myers Undetermined: Too Decomposed Citrus 01/07/2019 MNW19003 M 275 Gulf of Mexico Crystal River Verified: Not Recovered Collier 01/07/2019 MSW19005 M 270 Factory Bay Marco Island Natural: Other Lee 01/07/2019 MSW19006 U 245 Pine Island Sound Bokeelia Verified: Not Recovered Lee 01/08/2019 MSW19007 M 254 Matlacha Pass Matlacha Human Related: Watercraft Collision Citrus 01/09/2019 MNW19004 F 245 Homosassa River Homosassa
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Classification
    NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received QCJ 23 1987 Inventory—Nomination Form date entered f , See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name_________________ historic st. Joseph's Catholic Church and or common N/A 2. Location street & number Miller Street, N.E. N/A not for publication city, town Palm Bay N/A vicinity of state Florida code 012 county Brevard code 009 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum _JL_ building(s) X private unoccupied __ commercial __ park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment X religious object N/A in process x yes: restricted government __ scientific N/A being considered _ yes: unrestricted industrial "no transportation military other: 4. Owner off Property name Catholic Diocesse of Orlando street & number P.O. Box 1800 city, town Orlando vicinity of state Florida 32802 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Brevard County Courthouse street & number 40° South Street city, town Titusville state Florida 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title N/A has this property been determined eligible? __ yes -A no date N/A federal state county __ local depository for survey records N/A city, town N/A state N/A 7. Description Condition Check one Check one x excellent deteriorated unaltered _X_ original site good ruins _X_ altered moved date fair gnevposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance St.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Florida
    ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX: EAST FLORIDA INTRODUCTION 8C) Sheltered Riprap An Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) database has been 8D) Sheltered Rocky, Rubble Shores developed for the marine and coastal areas of East Florida. The Area 9A) Sheltered Tidal Flats of Interest (AOI) includes the following marine, coastal and 9B) Vegetated Low Banks estuarine water bodies: Atlantic Ocean from the Georgia - Florida border to Spanish River Park in Boca Raton, Florida; St. Marys River 9C) Hyper-Saline Tidal Flats and Amelia River (Fort Clinch SP); Nassau Sound, Nassau River, 10A) Salt- and Brackish-water Marshes South Amelia River, Back River (Amelia Island); Sawpit Creek, 10B) Freshwater Marshes Clapboard Creek, Simpson Creek, Mud River, Fort George River (Big Talbot and Little Talbot Islands); St. Johns River; Intracoastal 10C) Swamps Waterway; Guana River, Lake Ponte Vedra, Tolomato River (St. 10D) Scrub-Shrub Wetlands Augustine); Matanzas River, San Sebastian River, Salt Run 10F) Mangroves (Anastasia State Park); Pellicer Creek (Marineland); Halifax River, Rose Bay, Strickland Bay, Spruce Creek, Trumbull Bay (Daytona Each of the shoreline habitats are described on pages 10-18 in Beach); Ponce de Leon Inlet, Indian River North (Smyrna Beach); terms of their physical description, predicted oil behavior, and Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River (Canaveral National Seashore, response considerations. Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge); Indian River (Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge); St. Lucie River, Peck Lake (Jensen SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Beach); Loxahatchee River, Jupiter Inlet (Jupiter); Little Lake Worth, North Palm Beach Waterway, Earman River, Palm Beach Inlet; Lake Biological information presented in this atlas was collected, Worth Lagoon (Palm Beach); Gulf Stream (Delray Beach); and Lake compiled, and reviewed with the assistance of biologists and Rogers, Lake Wyman (Boca Raton).
    [Show full text]
  • F L O R I D a F W C D L E F a C I L I T I E S a N D M a N a G E D L a N D S
    F l o r i d a F W C D L E F a c i l i t i e s a n d M a n a g e d L a n d s A L A B A M A Century «¬6 Paxton Esto Graceville Malone Blackwater Laurel Berrydale Hill «¬29 Wildlife H O L M E S E SC A M B I A Jacob Brownsdale Field Office Blackwater Greenwood «¬12 AB85 City Fisheries «¬15 ¤£331 Bonifay For estr y Natural Resources Allentown Research and Station / Division G E O R G I A Conser v. Ser vice- Chumuckla Munson Development of Forestr y «¬30 «¬147 Center Crestview Westville Cottondale Marianna Blue Water SA N TA Bonifay Chipley «¬32 Creek/Molino Ponce «¬31 De Funiak de Leon Grand Div. of Forestr y R OS A ¬13 Springs «¬26 28 Ridge «¬33 «¬7 « «¬ «¬11 «¬25 Sneads N A S S A U «¬149 Alford Hilliard O K A L O O SA Chattahoochee «¬148 «¬5 Milton J A C K S O N ¤£17 Pace «¬10 «¬146 Yulee ¨¦§10 ¨¦§10 G A D S D E N 1 Fernandina 29 ¤£ ¤£ ¤£90 WA SH I N G TO N Havana See Inset Map Beach AB75 AB200 95 ¬16 J E F F E R SO N Jennings ¨¦§ Pensacola « Quincy WALTON Altha Gretna HA MI LTO N «¬81 «¬145 «¬4 «¬150 Econfina Monticello «¬151 «¬34 «¬57 §75 Jasper «¬9 ¬17 «¬55 ¬64 ¨¦ Pe n s a c o l a «¬14 « Carter « D U VA L «¬56 «¬152 F i e l d O f f i c e L E «¬8 ay Track «¬35 ¤£301 «¬144 «¬155 B «¬54 Aucilla Madison «¬76 «¬79 Jacksonville ola Chactawhatchee Bay Blountstown «¬53 Tallahassee Lloyd Greenville CO LUMB IA !Z ac «¬86 Zoo Field Lab «¬154 ens «¬156 «¬153 Z P ¤£98 Bristol «¬63 10 «¬87 «¬77 ! «¬27 Waukeenah ¨¦§ ¤£441 A t l a n t i c Lee ¬3 18 Hosford Z! 143 « «¬ «¬88 «¬ P e n sa c o l a Fort Walton ¬65 «¬78 Jacksonville «¬19 «¬22 « «¬75 Miramar
    [Show full text]
  • LIVING SHORELINES: Guidance for Sarasota Bay Watershed
    LIVING SHORELINES: Guidance for Sarasota Bay Watershed Prepared for June 2018 Sarasota Bay Estuary Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Living Shorelines Page Section 1 ................................................................................................................................1-1 Purpose of the Document ....................................................................................................1-1 Section 2 ................................................................................................................................2-1 Living Shoreline Overview ...................................................................................................2-1 2.1 What Are Living Shorelines?................................................................................2-1 2.2 Why Hardened Shorelines are not Always the Answer for Erosion Protection .............................................................................................................2-2 2.3 What are the benefits associated with living shorelines? ....................................2-3 Section 3 ................................................................................................................................3-1 Status of Shorelines in Sarasota Bay Watershed .............................................................3-1 Section 4 ................................................................................................................................4-1 Regionally Successful Projects ..........................................................................................4-1
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar Tree Palm Bay, FL
    COVID-19 PANDEMIC-PROOF ESSENTIAL GOODS & SERVICES NNN RETAIL FILE PHOTO OFFERING MEMORANDUM Dollar Tree Palm Bay, FL This property is listed in conjunction with Florida-licensed real estate broker Robert Long. www.preservewestcapital.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS 1 AERIAL 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION 2 ABOUT THE AREA 5 TENANT INFORMATION 3 DEMOGRAPHICS 7 Disclaimer MGM Capital Corp dba Preserve West Capital (“Broker”) has been retained on an exclusive basis to market the property Putnam Daily described herein (“Property”). Broker has been authorized by the Seller of the Property (“Seller”) to prepare and distribute Partner the enclosed information (“Material”) for the purpose of soliciting offers to purchase from interested parties. More detailed financial, title and tenant lease information may be made available upon request following the mutual execution of a letter of 415.445.5107 intent or contract to purchase between the Seller and a prospective purchaser. You are invited to review this opportunity and [email protected] make an offer to purchase based upon your analysis. If your offer results in the Seller choosing to open negotiations with you, CA RE License #01750064 you will be asked to provide financial references. The eventual purchaser will be chosen based upon an assessment of price, terms, ability to close the transaction and such other matters as the Seller deems appropriate. Lindsey Snider The Material is intended solely for the purpose of soliciting expressions of interest from qualified investors for the acquisition of the Property. The Material is not to be copied and/or used for any other purpose or made available to any other person Vice President without the express written consent of Broker or Seller.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee County Manatee Protection Plan
    LEE COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION PLAN June 17, 2004 Prepared by: Lee County Division of Natural Resources PO Box 398 Ft. Myers, FL 33902 Lee County Visitor and Convention Bureau Approved: June 29, 2004 John E. Albion, Chairman Lee County Board of County Commissioners Approved: August 24, 2004 Kenneth D. Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Concurrence: August 26, 2004 James Slack, Field Supervisor South Florida Ecological Services Office US Fish and Wildlife Service Executive Summary This Manatee Protection Plan is organized to present first a discussion of manatees and an analysis of manatee abundance in Lee County. An evaluation of boating activity , and the identification of evaluation criteria for the development or expansions of boat facilities follow this. Finally, thresholds and policies are presented to outline Boat Facility siting criteria in Lee County. Once finalized and approved by all parties, these thresholds and policies will explain how the plan is to be used and how preferred boat facility projects differ from non-preferred projects. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................ii List of Figures...............................................................................................................iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................iv List of Appendices .......................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program
    Sebastian Inlet This p ublication was produced by the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program St. Johns River Water Management District Palm Bay Service Center 525 Community College Parkway S.E. Palm Bay, FL 32909 (321) 984-4950 • (800) 226-3747 http://irl.sjrwmd.com © 2007 St. Johns River Water Management District Contents 3. Meeting place Lagoon is rich in its people, wildlife, history and waterways. 5. Fast facts A quick glance at some of the numbers that make the lagoon unique. 6. Resources Biological diversity is a key to the health of the lagoon. 14. Lagoon basics One, two, three of lagoon science. 24. Solving problems Look at the changing face of the lagoon. 30. Newest threats New era brings new threats to water quality. 32. Lagoon history Many factors shaped the lagoon region. 36. What individuals can do Each person can make a difference. See how. An Introduction to a Natural Treasure 1 2 Indian River Lagoon MEETING PLACE Lagoon represents a meeting place for people, wildlife and waters he Indian River Lagoon is Tremarkable — it is a complex and dynamic estuarine system. Throughout the length of the lagoon, the various segments that comprise the whole system are influenced by the locations of inlets connecting the lagoon to the Atlantic Ocean and by freshwater entering the system through an extensive network of streams, rivers, canals, ditches and overland runoff. The lagoon is home to a rich array of plants and animals that depend on its water quality for their existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Planning
    FFlloorriida Ciirrccuummnnaavviiggaattioionna lS Saaltltwwaatteerr PPaaddddling Trraaiill A L A B A M A G E O R G I A HOLMES ESCAMBIA Bonifay Crestview Chipley Marianna SANTA ROSA 4 De Funiak Springs JACKSON OKALOOSA WALTON NASSAU Fernandina Beach Milton ¡¢ Yulee 19 WASHINGTON Quincy Monticello GADSDEN Jasper 26 Pensacola Fort Walton Beach LEON Madison Blountstown HAMILTON Bristol Tallahassee JEFFERSON MADISON Jacksonville BAY CALHOUN Live Oak Macclenny DUVAL BAKER Atlantic Panama City WAKULLA SUWANNEE Lake City Palm Valley 2 LIBERTY Crawfordville 25 Perry COLUMBIA Ocean 1 Middleburg Mayo UNION TAYLOR Lake Butler Green Cove Springs CLAY Starke GULF LAFAYETTE 3 BRADFORD St. Augustine FRANKLIN ST. JOHNS Port St. Joe 24 Apalachicola GILCHRIST ALACHUA 5 Palatka Cross City Gainesville PUTNAM Trenton DIXIE Palm Coast Bunnell Bronson 4 FLAGLER 23 6 Ormond Beach LEVY MARION Daytona Beach Ocala Port Orange De Land VOLUSIA Deltona Lady Lake ¨§¦ Beverly Hills De Bary 95 Eustis Inverness CITRUS LeesburgTavares Mount Dora Sanford Florida Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail SUMTER SEMINOLE Bushnell Altamonte Springs LAKE Titusville HERNANDO ClermoWnitnter GarOderlnando 22 7 Brooksville Port St. John Spring Hill ORANGE Merritt Island Dade City Kissimmee PASCO St. Cloud Zephyrhills Haines City Melbourne Palm Harbor Lakeland Palm Bay Plant City Winter Haven ¡¢ Dunedin 441 OSCEOLA Section 1: Pensacola / Fort Pickens Clearwater Tampa POLK Brandon BREVARD Largo Bartow Lake Wales HILLSBOROUGH Sebastian Section 2: Santa Rosa Sound / Emerald Coast Pinellas Park 8 St. Petersburg Gifford21 PINELLAS INDIAN RIVER Vero Beach Section 3: Panama City / St. Andrews Bay ¡¢ 301 Avon Park Wauchula Sebring Section 4: Forgotten Coast MANATEE ¡¢ Fort Pierce Bradenton HARD17 EE Port St.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Development Plan Major Update FY 2018‐2027 Transit Development Plan
    Space Coast Area Transit Transit Development Plan Major Update FY 2018‐2027 Transit Development Plan October 2017 Prepared by Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Objectives of the Plan ............................................................................................................................... 1 State Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 1 Organization of Report ............................................................................................................................. 2 Section 2: Baseline Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 5 Service Area Description ........................................................................................................................... 5 Population Profile ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Growth .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Profiles ................................................................................................................................. 15 Demographic and Journey-to-Work Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • CITY CHARTER (As Amended in 2016)
    CITY CHARTER (as amended in 2016) PREAMBLE We, the citizens of this city, in order to build a municipality which enhances the ideals of community living, to secure the benefits of municipal home rule and local self-government granted to us by the laws of this state, and to promote our God given rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, do hereby adopt this as our charter for the city of Palm Bay, in the county of Brevard, state of Florida. ARTICLE I. CREATION, POWERS AND DEFINITIONS Section 1.01 Creation, Powers, and Definitions. The existing municipal corporation known as the city of Palm Bay, Brevard County, Florida, is hereby continued and re-established. It shall have and may exercise all governmental, corporate and proprietary powers under the Constitution, general and special acts of the state of Florida as fully and completely as if specifically enumerated in this charter to enable it to conduct municipal government, perform municipal functions and render municipal services. Wherever the word “city” shall appear in this charter, it shall be construed to mean the “city of Palm Bay”. Wherever the word “manager” shall appear in this charter, it shall be construed to mean the “city manager”. Wherever the words “council”, “city council”, or “city of Palm Bay” shall appear in this charter, it shall be construed to mean “the mayor and the other councilmembers”, unless specifically excepted by other provisions of this charter. When any reference herein is made to any gender, such reference shall be deemed to include either masculine, feminine or neuter, as appropriate, and any reference herein to any number 1 shall be deemed to include both singular and plural where the context of the provisions of this document shall permit or require.
    [Show full text]