DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation on Possible Changes to Bus Route U5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Consultation on possible changes to bus route U5 Consultation Report September 2015 Consultation on possible changes to bus route U5 Consultation Report 2 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 2 The consultation ................................................................................................ 5 3 Overview of consultation responses ................................................................. 7 4 Responses from members of the public ............................................................ 9 5 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders .............................. 10 6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 10 Appendix A – Copy of the consultation material ....................................................... 11 Appendix B – All issues raised for Question 8 .......................................................... 15 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ............................................................ 16 3 1 Introduction Transport for London conducted a six week public consultation between the 17 July and 14 August 2015 on proposals to extend route U5. The proposals would make it more convenient for passengers to travel between West Drayton, Uxbridge and a new supermarket, now open at Fairer Corner, Hayes. Route U5 currently runs between Uxbridge station and Hayes & Harlington station serving Hillingdon Hospital, West Drayton Station and Stockley Park estate. It was proposed that the route be extended from its current terminus at Hayes and Harlington station along Station Road to Fairey Corner and the new supermarket, where a new bus stand facility has been created as part of the development. Members of the public and stakeholders were invited to give their views either by filling in the questionnaire online or by responding via post or email. Letters were sent to those living near to the proposed new terminus. This document summarises their responses to the consultation. A separate document contains our responses to the main issues raised in the consultation. The consultation generated 97 responses from members of the public. There were no responses received from any stakeholders. Subject to the comments put forward in this consultation it is intended that the proposals are introduced from 26 September 2015. 4 2 The consultation The consultation was designed to enable TfL to understand opinion about the proposed changes The potential outcomes of the consultation are: We decide the consultation raises no issues that should prevent us from proceeding with the scheme as originally planned. We modify the scheme in response to issues raised in consultation We abandon the scheme as a result of issues raised in the consultation. 2.1 Consultation objectives The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the change To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions. 2.2 Who we consulted The public consultation intended to seek the views of people who live near to the proposed route, current users of the service and other potential users. We also consulted stakeholders including the affected local Council, traffic police, London TravelWatch, Members of Parliament, Assembly Members and local interest groups. A list of the stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix C. 2.3 Consultation material, distribution and publicity The consultation was published online where a dedicated webpage included the details and background to the proposal. We raised awareness of the consultation by sending a targeted email to 3,935 registered Oyster Card holders who are existing users of route U5. We also sent an email to key stakeholders. We wrote to 779 properties near to the proposed extension. In addition to the emails and letters sent, we displayed notices at bus stops and other locations along the proposed extension. The notices provided information on the proposal alongside a map, and how to respond. Copies of the consultation material are shown in Appendix A. 2.4 What questions did we ask in the consultation? We asked eight questions (five general and three specific). Of the general questions we asked respondents for their name, email address, postcode and if they were responding on behalf of an organisation. There were two closed questions (questions 6-7), and one open question (question 8). 5 The following three closed questions specifically asked respondents about the scheme: Question 6: Do you currently use route U5? Question 7: Are you in favour of our proposals to extend route U5? The following open question specifically asked respondents about the scheme: Question 8: Do you have any further comments relating to our proposal for route U5? 6 3 Overview of consultation responses 3.1 How people heard about the consultation We issued an email to 3,935 people with registered Oyster Cards who use route U5. 70 people responded as a result of the email. Four respondents had heard about the consultation through other means, with two specifying they read about it from posters placed along the extension. How did you hear about this consultation? 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Read Received Received Saw it on Read Other about it Not an email a letter the TfL about it in (please on social Answered from TfL from TfL website the press specify) media Number of replies 700114 1 4 7 3.2 How people responded How people responded Email Webpage 7% 93% 3.3 Where did people respond from? (postcode analysis) We asked respondents to provide a postcode. 84 people responded to this question. The map overleaf, illustrates plotted postcodes mapped against their level of support for the proposed changes. 7 2.5 Where did people respond from? (postcode analysis) 8 4 Responses from members of the public We received 97 responses from members of the public. Do you currently use route U5? 87 respondents answered this question. 84% (81) of the respondents indicated that they currently use route U5, while 6% said they did not. Do you use route U5? 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Yes No Not Answered Number of replies 81 6 10 Are you in favour of our proposals to extend route U5? 94 respondents answered this question. The majority of respondents indicated that they are in favour of extending the service; with 92% (89) of the respondents stating that they support the proposed extension and 1% (1) stating opposition. 3% (3) of the respondents were partially in favour of the scheme – usually on condition of other changes. Are you in favour of our proposals for route U5? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Not Yes No Partially Not sure No opinion Answered Total 8913013 9 Do you have any further comments? We also asked for any comments on the proposals. There were 17 overarching themes. The full list of issues and themes is provided in Appendix B. The table below indicates the top five issues raised. Number of Top five issues and themes comments Positive comment: Agree with proposal / good idea 34 Positive comment: Great help for shoppers and workers at shop 20 General comment: Change vehicle type / size 4 General comment: Good idea but may make route substantially busier 3 General comment: Increase frequency 3 5 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders We received no response from any statutory bodies or stakeholders with regards to this proposal. 6 Conclusion The responses show that route U5 remains popular for those wanting to connect between Uxbridge station, Hayes & Harlington station, Hillingdon Hospital, West Drayton Station and Stockley Park estate. Many respondents commented on the value of the current service and that extending it to the new supermarket would further enhance the attractiveness of route. The responses from consultations are used to inform our decision making and final planning. We have listened to the views expressed in this consultation and will continue to monitor usage and capacity on the route to ensure they meet the demands placed upon them. The majority of respondents were in support of our proposal. It is intended that the extended route start from 26 September 2015. 10 Appendix A – Copy of the consultation material A1 - Bus stop poster 11 A2 – Copy of the email issued to registered Oyster Card holders A3 – Copy of the email sent to statutory bodies and stakeholders 12 A4 - Copy of the dedicated consultation web page https://consultaitons.tfl.gov.uk/buses/route-u5 13 A5 - Copy of the letter delivered to properties near to the extension 14 Appendix B – All issues raised for Question 8 Number of Issues and themes raised comments Service related comments: (Vehicle size, frequency, capacity etc.). Change vehicle type / size 4 Good idea but may make route substantially busier 3 Increase frequency 3 Introduce night service 1 Make U4 & U5 interwork better 1 U4: More services on this route at school times 2 Negative comments Negative comment: Against because already made mind up 1 Negative comment: Against because already put sign on bus stop 1 General comments Buses should serve stop in street beside shop 2 New bus stop should not hold traffic up 2 Passengers should be able to get off at stand 1 Question: Turnaround point? 1 Not Answered
Recommended publications
  • 83-483-N83 Consultation Report

    83-483-N83 Consultation Report

    Consultation on proposed changes to bus route 83 and the introduction of new route 483 Consultation Report June 2016 1 Consultation on proposed changes to bus route 83 and the introduction of new route 483 Consultation Report 2 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 2 The consultation .......................................................................................... 2 3 Responses from members of the public ...................................................... 4 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ......................... 14 Appendix A – Consultation materials .............................................................. 19 Appendix B – Leaflet distribution area ............................................................. 24 Appendix C - Postcode Analysis ..................................................................... 25 Appendix D – All comments received .............................................................. 30 Appendix E – List of stakeholders consulted ................................................... 39 1 1 Introduction We recently consulted stakeholders and the public about a proposed change to bus route 83 and the introduction of a new bus route, numbered 483. The consultation took place for a period of six weeks from Monday 11 January to Monday 22 February 2016. This report explains the background to the scheme and consultation, and summarises the responses. Route 83 is a 24-hour service that runs
  • Buses from West Drayton

    Buses from West Drayton

    Buses from West Drayton U1 AD Ruislip HIG FIELD RO FAIR COLHAM AVENUE H Grand Union Canal S A T L RE ST BE . School West Ruislip S E T RT EPHEN'S T R OA BENTINCK ROAD RO D U5 350 A Ickenham Uxbridge Station Road D High Road for intu Uxbridge Fairey Corner HORTON ROAD L R C O B S Swakeleys Road Cowley Road Hayes & Harlington E E L R KNOW T T S A V S West IS TATION CLOSE TO APPROA Drayton CK ROAD CH U3 Uxbridge Cowley Station Road for intu Uxbridge High Street Clayton Road for Hayes Town Medical Centre RD RD WICK ILL WAR M M HA Uxbridge Station Road Hayes OL Civic Centre Botwell Green Sports C D & Leisure Centre R S T A CHE LE T R L R I IO ORCH Y E N AR U D DV N R Hillingdon Road Brunel University Church Road Botwell Lane E O N The Greenway Cleveland Road for Lake Farm Country Park V A A D RA RS B E Buses from West Drayton R D R A Playing E O U1 222 F R Ruislip N Field Uxbridge Brunel University Church Road Hillingdon Hospital Botwell Common Road A for intu Uxbridge Kingston Lane W Primary S School West Ruislip Cowley Road Hillingdon Hospital Colham Green Road Furzeground Way Destination finder U5 350 Ickenham Uxbridge Station Road Destination Bus routes Bus stops Destination Bus routes Bus stops High Road for intu Uxbridge Fairey Corner B Hounslow Bus Station 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j Botwell Common Road 350 ,c ,e ,g ,k Hounslow Treaty Shopping Centre 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j Botwell Lane 350 ,c ,e ,g ,k Hounslow West 222 ,b ,f ,h ,j for Lake Farm Country Park SwakeleysCowley Road Cowley Road Hayes &Violet Harlington Avenue Park View Road Stockley
  • Minutes PDF 94 KB

    Minutes PDF 94 KB

    MINUTES Meeting: Environment Committee Date: Wednesday 16 January 2019 Time: 10.00 am Place: Committee Room 5, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA Copies of the minutes may be found at: www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/environment Present: Caroline Russell AM (Chair) Leonie Cooper AM (Deputy Chair) Tony Arbour AM Jennette Arnold OBE AM Shaun Bailey AM Tom Copley AM David Kurten AM 1 Ap ologies for Absence and Chair's Announcements (Item 1) 1.1 Apologies for absence were received from Dr Onkar Sahota AM, for whom Tom Copley AM substituted. 2 Declarations of Interests (Item 2) 2.1 The Committee received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat. 2.2 Resolved: That the list of offices held by Assembly Members, as set out in the table at Agenda Item 2, be noted as disclosable pecuniary interests. City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk Greater London Authority Environment Committee Wednesday 16 January 2019 3 Minutes (Item 3) 3.1 Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 6 December 2018 be signed by the Chair as a correct record. 4 Summary List of Actions (Item 4) 4.1 The Committee received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat. 4.2 Resolved: That the completed and outstanding actions arising from its previous meetings of the Committee be noted. 5 Action Taken under Delegated Authority (Item 5) 5.1 The Committee received the report of the Executive Director of Secretariat.
  • Planning for Schools Development Plan Document SD8A Consultation Statement

    Planning for Schools Development Plan Document SD8A Consultation Statement

    Planning for Schools Development Plan Document SD8A Consultation Statement 8th July 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with Regulation 22(1) (c) of the Town and Country Planning (Local development) (England) Regulations 2012 (‘the Regulations’). It details the publication procedures undertaken by the Council for the Planning for Schools Development Plan Document (PfS DPD) in compliance with the Regulations. The statement seeks to show how the local planning authority has prepared the plan in accordance with Regulation 18 and has dealt with any representations received relating to a local plan in accordance with Regulation 20. 1.2 For clarity, this statement has been divided into two sections as follows • Section two deals with representations received at the Initial and Options stage. It sets out which bodies and persons were invited to make representations, details of the consultation and a brief analysis of the representations received. The summary of the main issues and how those issues were addressed is published in the standalone report titled EB4 ‘ Planning for Schools DPD, Issues and Options, Representations Report’ (February 2015). • Section three deals with representations received at the Publication stage. It details the publication procedures undertaken by the Council, the number of representations received and a summary of the main issues raised in the representations. 1.3 This consultation statement is also supplemented by a full summary (Part B – in an excel spreadsheet sheet form) of any Regulation 20 representations received together with the detailed responses and recommendations of the Council. A summary of the spreadsheet will also be provided in the appendices – Appendix D.
  • Extensively Refurbished Grade a O Ce Accommodation, Prominently Positioned on Stockley Park, Close to Heathrow, with Views Over an Impressive Tree Lined Square

    Extensively Refurbished Grade a O Ce Accommodation, Prominently Positioned on Stockley Park, Close to Heathrow, with Views Over an Impressive Tree Lined Square

    A PRIME INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY ON ONE OF EUROPE’S LEADING BUSINESS PARKS Extensively refurbished Grade A o ce accommodation, prominently positioned on Stockley Park, close to Heathrow, with views over an impressive tree lined square. 2 4 THE SQUARE, STOCKLEY PARK Investment Summary • Prime South East multi-let o ce prominently positioned on one of Europe’s premier business parks. • Stockley Park is home to an impressive list of occupiers including Apple, GlaxoSmithKline, Canon, Marks & Spencer, Sharp, Hasbro and Suntory. • Extensively refurbished Grade A oce accommodation, situated within the most recently developed area of Stockley Park on an impressive tree lined square. • 4 The Square is arranged over ground, first, second and third floors, comprising a total of 81,403 sq ft (NIA). • The property, which was extensively refurbished in 2014, benefits from an impressive entrance, double height reception and common parts. • 356 car parking spaces with an excellent ratio of 1:229 sq ft. • BREEAM UK Non-Domestic Refurbishment and Fit-Out 2014 ‘Excellent’. • The property is multi-let to three tenants, providing a WAULT of approximately 5.40 years to breaks. • Total income available is £2,327,466 per annum, reflecting £28.83 per sq ft. The vendor will provide a 24 month rental guarantee, and a 12 month rates and service charge guarantee on the vacancy. • Highly reversionary when compared with prime rents on Stockley Park at £35.00 psf. • With the rental tone on Stockley Park set to continue to improve, 4 The Square provides a rare opportunity to realise genuine reversionary potential, through letting the vacant accommodation.
  • London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 19 March 2020 Time: 10.00 Am Place: Chamber, City Hall, the Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA

    London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 19 March 2020 Time: 10.00 Am Place: Chamber, City Hall, the Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA

    MINUTES Meeting: London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 19 March 2020 Time: 10.00 am Place: Chamber, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA Copies of the minutes may be found at: www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/whole-assembly Present: Len Duvall AM (Chair) Florence Eshalomi AM MP Shaun Bailey AM Susan Hall AM (Deputy Chairman) Siân Berry AM Joanne McCartney AM Andrew Boff AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM Leonie Cooper AM Keith Prince AM Unmesh Desai AM Caroline Russell AM Tony Devenish AM Dr Onkar Sahota AM Andrew Dismore AM Peter Whittle AM City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 19 March 2020 1 Apologies for Absence and Chair's Announcements (Item 1) 1.1 In the absence of the Chair and Deputy Chairman of the Assembly, who had both given apologies for absence, and in accordance with Standing Order 2.1C, the Assistant Director, Committee & Member Services conducted the election of a Chair for the meeting. 1.2 Dr Onkar Sahota AM moved and Susan Hall AM seconded that Len Duvall AM be appointed as Chair for the duration of the meeting. 1.3 There being one nomination before the Assembly, it was: Resolved: That Len Duvall AM be appointed Chair for the duration of the meeting. [Len Duvall AM in the Chair] 1.4 The Chair then presided over the election of a Deputy Chairman for the duration of the meeting.
  • DVS Phase 1 Consultation Report

    DVS Phase 1 Consultation Report

    Direct Vision Standards Consultation results November 2017 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2 Methodology for analysis of consultation responses ......................................... 2 3 Analysis of responses to closed question ......................................................... 3 4 Analysis of responses to open question ......................................................... 19 5 Responses from stakeholders ........................................................................ 50 Appendix A – List of stakeholders consulted……………………………………………65 Appendix B - Stakeholder email..………………………………………………………...72 1 1 Introduction Between 24 January and 18 April 2017, we consulted on proposals to introduce a Direct Vision Standard for HGVs in London. This forms part of the Mayor’s commitment to reduce road danger through the adoption of a ‘Vision Zero’ approach. This document summarises the results to the consultation. About the proposals Much progress has been made through working in partnership with the freight industry to improve HGV safety, including HGV design, but we need to go further. Evidence shows that HGV drivers react more quickly using direct vision where they can see more of their surroundings directly through their windows, as opposed to indirectly through mirrors or monitors. This has the potential to reduce the risk of fatal or serious collisions. The proposals included introducing a new simple Direct Vision Standard which would rate vehicles from zero (poor) to five star (excellent) based on how much a HGV driver can see directly from a vehicle cab, rather than through other equipment such as mirrors. The aim of which is to give regulators, manufacturers, operators and contractors an objective standard by which to rate and improve the safety of HGVs. The proposals also included using this standard to ban or restrict HGVs with the most limited direct vision from London’s roads.
  • Stockley Park Travel Information

    Stockley Park Travel Information

    Stockley Park Travel Information By bus The A10 Heathrow Fast is a dedicated frequent bus from Heathrow Airport Central Bus Station to Stockley Park in just 10 minutes, from Heathrow Central Bus Station to Uxbridge, Terminates in Uxbridge outside the tube station. It operates every 15 minutes during peak time. The 350 Bus is a dedicated frequent Transfer Service that serves the Park and links West Drayton and Hayes and Harlington stations (every 15 minutes), taking just 5-7 minutes to Stockley Park. The route extends to Heathrow Airport, Terminal 5. In addition, you will find a mini-cab office just outside the stations for a faster journey to the Park. The local U5 bus serves the Park and runs every 15 minutes during the day and 30 minutes during the evening, linking Hayes & Harlington, West Drayton and Uxbridge stations also serving Hillingdon Hospital. For further information contact Stockley Park on +44 (0) 1895 444 100 or visit the website www.stockleypark.co.uk. Tenant Address Tenant Name 1 Ironbridge Road GlaxoSmithKline 2 Ironbridge Road GlaxoSmithKline 3 Ironbridge Road GlaxoSmithKline 4 Ironbridge Road Busy Bees Nursery 1 Longwalk Road Celgene Limited 2 Longwalk Road Lucozade Ribena Suntory Ltd 3 Longwalk Road Marks & Spencer 4 Longwalk Road Vacant 5 Longwalk Road IMG Productions 1 Roundwood Avenue Kuehne + Nagel World Vision International K2M 2 Roundwood Avenue Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd 3 Roundwood Avenue Cargo Logic Management VeriFone 4 Roundwood Avenue The Bower 5 Roundwood Avenue MSC Cruise Management Ltd 6 Roundwood Avenue
  • Yiewsley Recreation Ground Management Plan 2015 – 2020

    Yiewsley Recreation Ground Management Plan 2015 – 2020

    Yiewsley Recreation Ground Management Plan 2015 – 2020 Green Spaces Team London Borough of Hillingdon Yiewsley Recreation Ground Management Plan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents page 1. Introducing Yiewsley Recreation Ground 2 2. Site Summary 2 Map 1 - Key Features of Yiewsley Recreation Ground 5 Map 2 - Aerial Photograph of Yiewsley Recreation Ground 6 Map 3 – Location of Yiewsley in London 7 3. Access 8 4. History 8 5. Ecology 9 6. Recreational facilities 7 7. Present use 10 8. Management arrangements 10 9. Vision for Yiewsley Recreation Ground 10 10. Site Aims and Objectives 11 11. Management Actions and Maintenance Plan 18 12. Appendices Appendix A – Introduction to the London Borough of Hillingdon 21 Appendix B – Site Grounds Maintenance Standards 23 Appendix C – Site Tree Survey 24 Appendix D – Site Marketing Analysis and Plan 26 Appendix E – Site Events and Marketing Materials 32 Appendix F – Site Deeds 34 Appendix G - Council Plan: Commitment to Green Flags 36 2 Yiewsley Recreation Ground Management Plan ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction to Yiewsley Recreation Ground The site now known as Yiewsley Recreation Ground was transferred to the then Yiewsley Urban District Council in 1926. The land was preserved for use as an ‘open space for public use and recreation’. Today “Yiewsley Rec” is a vibrant recreation ground, and incorporates lawn, bowling green, ball court and playground, and development
  • London's Political

    London's Political

    CONSTITUENCY MP (PARTY) MAJORITY Barking Margaret Hodge (Lab) 15,272 Battersea Jane Ellison (Con) 7,938 LONDON’S Beckenham Bob Stewart (Con) 18,471 Bermondsey & Old Southwark Neil Coyle (Lab) 4,489 Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali (Lab) 24,317 Bexleyheath & Crayford David Evennett (Con) 9,192 POLITICAL Brent Central Dawn Butler (Lab) 19,649 Brent North Barry Gardiner (Lab) 10,834 Brentford & Isleworth Ruth Cadbury (Lab) 465 Bromley & Chislehurst Bob Neill (Con) 13,564 MAP Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman (Lab) 25,824 Carshalton & Wallington Tom Brake (LD) 1,510 Chelsea & Fulham Greg Hands (Con) 16,022 This map shows the political control Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan Smith (Con) 8,386 of the capital’s 73 parliamentary Chipping Barnet Theresa Villiers (Con) 7,656 constituencies following the 2015 Cities of London & Westminster Mark Field (Con) 9,671 General Election. On the other side is Croydon Central Gavin Barwell (Con) 165 Croydon North Steve Reed (Lab [Co-op]) 21,364 a map of the 33 London boroughs and Croydon South Chris Philp (Con) 17,410 details of the Mayor of London and Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas (Lab) 4,980 London Assembly Members. Dulwich & West Norwood Helen Hayes (Lab) 16,122 Ealing Central & Acton Rupa Huq (Lab) 274 Ealing North Stephen Pound (Lab) 12,326 Ealing, Southall Virendra Sharma (Lab) 18,760 East Ham Stephen Timms (Lab) 34,252 Edmonton Kate Osamor (Lab [Co-op]) 15,419 Eltham Clive Efford (Lab) 2,693 Enfield North Joan Ryan (Lab) 1,086 Enfield, Southgate David Burrowes (Con) 4,753 Erith & Thamesmead
  • MGLA190719-8032 12 August 2019 Dear Mr Hai Thank You for Further

    MGLA190719-8032 12 August 2019 Dear Mr Hai Thank You for Further

    Abdul Hai (via WhatDoTheyKnow.com) Our Ref: MGLA190719-8032 12 August 2019 Dear Mr Hai Thank you for further email of confirming that you would like to see copies of the media monitoring reports held by the Greater London Authority (GLA) as provided to the GLA by Kantar. Your request has been dealt with under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please find attached the information we hold within the scope of your request. As we mentioned in our previous reply, the GLA only retains these summaries for approximately one calendar month. The links in the summaries do not directly link to the newspaper websites themselves, only to Kantar Media’s online platform. The daily summaries include articles related to the work of the GLA group including the Mayor, the London Assembly, TfL, Crossrail and the Met Police – there is no single ‘GLA list’. We are releasing the information that we hold in full, but we have made some minor redactions to remove third-party personal data in accordance with the provisions of section 40(2) of the Act. If you have any further questions relating to this matter, please contact me, quoting the reference MGLA190719-8032. Yours sincerely Ruth Phillips Information Governance Officer If you are unhappy with the way the GLA has handled your request, you may complain using the GLA’s FOI complaints and internal review procedure, available at: https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/governance-and-spending/sharing-our- information/freedom-information Police base set to close Barnet and Potters Bar Times, 18/07/2019, p.3, Simon
  • Stockley Park Heathrow UB11 1AF 7,705–15,514 Sq Ft (716–1,441 Sq

    Stockley Park Heathrow UB11 1AF 7,705–15,514 Sq Ft (716–1,441 Sq

    7,705–15,514 sq ft (716–1,441 sq m) Grade A offices Stockley Park Heathrow UB11 1AF 2 3 Stockley Park is a premier business The first floor north wing offers newly refurbished location that benefits from excellent open plan Grade A accommodation. transport connectivity and amenity, 7,705 sq ft is available and benefits from 31 car as well as unique parkland, lakes and parking spaces (1:251 sq ft). landscape areas. An additional 7,809 sq ft on the ground floor 1 Roundwood Avenue is a modern two- south wing will be available direct from the storey office building with a prominent, landlord in Q3 2021 or earlier, subject to surrender. front of park position. 4 5 specification VRF air conditioning and Perforated metal tile New LED lighting Fully accessible Double height 1 x 20 person New male, female Shower energy efficient chillers suspended ceilings raised floors reception (1,500 kg lift) and disabled WC facilities Open plan office Floor to ceiling 1:8 sq m occupational Full redecoration and EPC rating Efficient column Excellent 31 car parking spaces accommodation height of 2.7 m density provision new carpeting of B (28) free floor plates natural light (1:251 sq ft). Interior finishes etc pics 6 7 availability Accommodation sq ft sq m First floor north wing 7,705 716 Ground floor south wing* 7,809 725 Reception / Atrium 1,725 160 Total 15,514 1,441 * Lease in place and expiring in November 2021. Available subject to surrender. 1 7/8" First floor LC South wing North wing oad Bennetsfield R " 8 / 7 1 C L Lease in place and expiring in November 2021.