THE SCRIBLERIAN Spring 2017 Vol. XLVIII, No. 2 RECENT ARTICLES
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Articles and Reviews for Their Own Scholarly Use
Volume 7, Number 2 (2014) ISSN 1754-646X Journal of Literature and Science i Volume 7, Number 2 (2014) ISSN 1754-646X Contents 1 Gregory Lynall Scriblerian Projections of Longitude: Arbuthnot, Swift, and the Agency of Satire in a Culture of Invention 19 Bernard Lightman Conan Doyle’s Ideal Reasoner: The Case of the Reluctant Scientific Naturalist 37 Steven McLean Revolution as an Angel from the Sky: George Griffith’s Aeronautical Speculation 62 Emilie Taylor-Brown (Re)Constructing the Knights of Science: Parasitologists and their Literary Imaginations Article Reviews 80 Emily Bowles Review of Cheryl Blake Price’s “Vegetable Monsters: Man-Eating Trees in Fin-de-Siècle Fiction.” 82 Greg Garrard Review of Emily Horton’s “Reassessing the Two- Culture Debate: Popular Science in Ian McEwan’s The Child in Time and Enduring Love.” 84 Peter Johnston Review of Robert Nathan’s “Why It Matters: The Value of Literature as Object of Inquiry in Qualitative Research.” 86 Anne M. Thell Review of Mary Fairclough’s “The Telegraph: Radical Transmission in the 1790s.” 88 K. S. Whetter Review of Janine Rogers’s “A Compaignye of Sondry Folk: Mereology, Medieval Poetics and Contemporary Evolutionary Narrative in Richard Dawkins’ The Ancestor’s Tale.” 90 Carmel Raz Review of John Savarese’s “Ossian’s Folk Psychology.” 92 Notes on Contributors The Journal of Literature and Science is produced by the Centre for the Study of Science and Imagination (SCIMAG), 309 Regent Street, London, W1B 2HW Journal of Literature and Science iii Volume 7, Number 2 (2014) ISSN 1754-646X About the JLS The Journal of Literature and Science (JLS) is a peer-reviewed academic journal published twice annually in Summer and Winter . -
Romeo Revived .Pdf
McGirr, E. (2017). "What's in a Name?": Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber Brand. Shakespeare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor and Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Elaine M. McGirr Reader in Theatre & Performance Histories University of Bristol “What’s in a name?”: Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber brand Abstract: The 1744 and 1748/50 performances of Romeo and Juliet by Theophilus Cibber, Jenny Cibber and Susannah Cibber explain the significance of the play’s return to the repertory, uncover the history of rival interpretations of Juliet’s character, and make sense of the careers and reputations of the theatrical Cibbers. The “Cibberian” airs of all three Cibbers were markedly different, as were their interpretations of Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers. Keywords: Shakespearean adaptation, performance history, celebrity, authorial reputation, repertory In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet apostrophizes Romeo to deny thy father and refuse thy name, assuring her (supposedly) absent lover that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. -
Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag
omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. -
List of Freemasons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation , Search
List of Freemasons From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search Part of a series on Masonic youth organizations Freemasonry DeMolay • A.J.E.F. • Job's Daughters International Order of the Rainbow for Girls Core articles Views of Masonry Freemasonry • Grand Lodge • Masonic • Lodge • Anti-Masonry • Anti-Masonic Party • Masonic Lodge Officers • Grand Master • Prince Hall Anti-Freemason Exhibition • Freemasonry • Regular Masonic jurisdictions • Opposition to Freemasonry within • Christianity • Continental Freemasonry Suppression of Freemasonry • History Masonic conspiracy theories • History of Freemasonry • Liberté chérie • Papal ban of Freemasonry • Taxil hoax • Masonic manuscripts • People and places Masonic bodies Masonic Temple • James Anderson • Masonic Albert Mackey • Albert Pike • Prince Hall • Masonic bodies • York Rite • Order of Mark Master John the Evangelist • John the Baptist • Masons • Holy Royal Arch • Royal Arch Masonry • William Schaw • Elizabeth Aldworth • List of Cryptic Masonry • Knights Templar • Red Cross of Freemasons • Lodge Mother Kilwinning • Constantine • Freemasons' Hall, London • House of the Temple • Scottish Rite • Knight Kadosh • The Shrine • Royal Solomon's Temple • Detroit Masonic Temple • List of Order of Jesters • Tall Cedars of Lebanon • The Grotto • Masonic buildings Societas Rosicruciana • Grand College of Rites • Other related articles Swedish Rite • Order of St. Thomas of Acon • Royal Great Architect of the Universe • Square and Compasses Order of Scotland • Order of Knight Masons • Research • Pigpen cipher • Lodge • Corks Eye of Providence • Hiram Abiff • Masonic groups for women Sprig of Acacia • Masonic Landmarks • Women and Freemasonry • Order of the Amaranth • Pike's Morals and Dogma • Propaganda Due • Dermott's Order of the Eastern Star • Co-Freemasonry • DeMolay • Ahiman Rezon • A.J.E.F. -
Introduction
Notes Introduction 1. Abraham Cowley, ‘To the Royal Society’, ll. 41–46, quoted in Francis Bacon, The Essays, or Counsels, Civil and Moral (London: Knapton, 1691), sig. A3v. Swift owned this edition (see LRJS, I, 125–26). On the Miltonic parallels, see Robert B. Hinman, Abraham Cowley’s World of Order (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 189–90. 2. See, for instance, Richard G. Olson, ‘Tory-High Church Opposition to Science and Scientism in the Eighteenth Century: The Works of John Arbuthnot, Jonathan Swift, and Samuel Johnson’, in The Uses of Science in the Age of Newton, ed. John G. Burke (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), pp. 171–204. 3. Cowley, ‘To the Royal Society’, l. 59. See Francis Bacon, Novum Organum (1620), ‘Plan of the Work’, sig. B4v, in The Instauratio magna Part II: Novum organum and Associated Texts, ed. and trans. Graham Rees with Maria Wakely (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004), p. 33. 4. See Charles Webster, The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine, and Reform, 1626–1660 (London: Duckworth, 1975), esp. p. 96. 5. See John R. R. Christie, ‘Laputa Revisited’, in Nature Transfigured: Science and Literature, 1700–1900, eds Christie and Sally Shuttleworth (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), pp. 45–60, and Brian Vickers, ‘Swift and the Baconian Idol’, in The World of Jonathan Swift: Essays for the Tercentenary, ed. B. Vickers (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968), pp. 87–128. There has been general disagreement, however, with Vickers’s argument that ‘Bacon stood for many things that Swift detested’, and that Swift’s allusions were intended to mock Bacon. -
Responses by Christian Scholars to Extra-Biblical Data on the Flood from 1500 to 1860
Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Science and Mathematics Book Chapters School of Science and Mathematics 12-27-2020 Responses by Christian Scholars to Extra-Biblical Data on the Flood from 1500 to 1860 Lynden J. Rogers Avondale University College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/sci_math_chapters Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Rogers, L. J. (2020). Responses by Christian scholars to extra-biblical data on the Flood from 1500 to 1860. In L. Rogers (Ed.), The Biblical Flood: The Context and History of Seventh-day Adventist Understanding (2nd ed., pp. 61-114). Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Science and Mathematics at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Mathematics Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 61 Chapter Three Responses by Christian Scholars to Extra-biblical Data on the Flood from 1500 to 1860 Lynden J. Rogers Introduction It can be argued that modern geology began through attempts to explain natural features of Earth’s surface as consequences of a better known as Steno, and often viewed as the seventeenth-century forebear of modern geology, “invoked Noah’s Flood to explain the nature of fossils”, published in 1669. In the same vein, Janet Browne discusses “the critical role played by Noah’s Ark in the development of ideas about the geographical distribution of animals and plants”.1 But the stratigraphic studies which Steno pioneered proved somewhat retributive in that they eventually sounded the death knell for the idea that the Flood was responsible for producing most of Earth’s geological features. -
Samuel Johnson's Pragmatism and Imagination
Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination By Stefka Ritchie Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination By Stefka Ritchie This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Stefka Ritchie All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-1603-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-1603-8 A sketch of Samuel Johnson, after Joshua Reynold (circa 1769) By Svetlan Stefanov (2009) (http://www.phot4oart.com) CONTENTS List of Illustrations ................................................................................... viii Abstract ...................................................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................................ xi Acknowledgements .................................................................................. xiv Chronology: Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) ............................................... xv Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xviii Chapter One ................................................................................................ -
Theorizing Audience and Spectatorial Agency
Swarthmore College Works English Literature Faculty Works English Literature 2014 Theorizing Audience and Spectatorial Agency Betsy Bolton Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-english-lit Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Betsy Bolton. (2014). "Theorizing Audience and Spectatorial Agency". Oxford Handbook Of The Georgian Theatre, 1737-1832. 31-52. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600304.013.012 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-english-lit/188 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Literature Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHAPTER 2 THEORIZING AUDIENCE AND SPECTATORIAL AGENCY BETSY BOLTON Audiences are a problem, and Georgian theatre audiences are more of a problem than many.' Records may yet yield more than we know, but there remain many questions about Georgian audiences that we may never be able to answer. We don’t know how a statistically significant sample of individual spectators responded to topical allusions or scandalous references. We don’t know how permeable in practice were the social boundaries attributed to pit, box, and gallery. We still don’t even know what constituted a ‘good’ house or what defined a ‘brilliant’ audience—though Judith Milhous notes that some of this evidence lurks in the highly -
Literature in Context: a Chronology, C16601825
Literature in Context: A Chronology, c16601825 Entries referring directly to Thomas Gray appear in bold typeface. 1660 Restoration of Charles II. Patents granted to reopen London theatres. Actresses admitted onto the English and German stage. Samuel Pepys begins his diary (1660 1669). Birth of Sir Hans Sloane (16601753), virtuoso and collector. Vauxhall Gardens opened. Death of Velàzquez (15591660), artist. 1661 Birth of Daniel Defoe (c16611731), writer. Birth of Anne Finch, Countess of Winchilsea (16611720), writer. Birth of Sir Samuel Garth (16611719). Louis XIV crowned in France (reigns 16611715). 1662 Publication of Butler’s “Hudibras” begins. The Royal Society is chartered. Death of Blaise Pascal (16231662), mathematician and philosopher. Charles II marries Catherine of Braganza and receives Tangier and Bombay as part of the dowry. Peter Lely appointed Court Painter. Louis XIV commences building at Versailles with Charles Le Brun as chief adviser. 1663 Milton finishes “Paradise Lost”. Publication of the Third Folio edition of Shakespeare. The Theatre Royal, Bridges Street, opened on the Drury Lane site with a revival of Fletcher’s “The Humorous Lieutenant”. Birth of Cotton Mather (16631728), American preacher and writer. 1664 Birth of Sir John Vanbrugh (16641726), dramatist and architect. Birth of Matthew Prior (16641721), poet. Lully composes for Molière’s ballets. “Le Tartuffe” receives its first performance. English forces take New Amsterdam and rename it New York. Newton works on Theory of Gravity (16641666). 1665 The Great Plague breaks out in London. Newton invents differential calculus. The “Journal des Savants”, the first literary periodical, is published in Paris. -
Information to Users
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author didsend notUMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wül indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the origmal manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 Horth Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 THOMAS KING AT SADLER'S WELLS AND DRURY LANE: PROPRIETORSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN LATE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH THEATRE, 1772-1788 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Evan M. -
An Exploration of John Woodwardâ•Žs
THE POWER OF THE AUTHOR OF NATURE “THE POWER OF THE AUTHOR OF NATURE”: AN EXPLORATION OF JOHN WOODWARD’S FUSION OF NATURAL AND REVEALED RELIGION By CHRISTINE BUGLER, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Christine Bugler, August 2012 i McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (1992) Hamilton, Ontario (English) TITLE: “The Power of the Author of Nature”: An Exploration of John Woodward’s Fusion of Natural and Revealed Religion AUTHOR: Christine Bugler, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Peter Walmsley NUMBER OF PAGES: iv, 104 ii ABSTRACT: Sir Isaac Newton’s famous discovery of gravity marks the rapid advancement of science in the English seventeenth century, and a permanent shift away from the scientific methods of antiquity. Natural philosophers were beginning to look at the physical world in new and dynamic ways. However, much of this new theory conflicted with traditional theology, which was problematic for Christian followers of this ‘new science’. To negotiate this conflict, a group of natural philosophers developed a new branch of science entitled physico-theology. This stream aims to prove that science does not dismiss religion, but is able to reinforce the existence of God and the truth of Biblical texts. John Woodward is a largely overlooked participant in physico-theology, but his literary works supply key information to modern readers in the understanding of this field. This study critically examines Woodward’s Natural History of the Earth for its significant contributions to early modern science and literary techniques of this discipline. -
Front Matter
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19581-2 - Defoe’s America Dennis Todd Frontmatter More information DEFOE’S AMERICA The Americas appear as an evocative setting in more than half of Daniel Defoe’s novels and often offer a new beginning for his characters. In the first full-length study of Defoe and colonial- ism, Dennis Todd explores why the New World loomed so large in Defoe’s imagination. By focusing on the historical contexts that informed Defoe’s depiction of American Indians, African slaves, and white indentured servants, Dennis Todd investigates the colonial assumptions that shaped his novels and, at the same time, uncov- ers how Defoe used details of the American experience in complex, often figurative ways to explore the psychological bases of the pro- found conversions and transformations that his heroes and heroines undergo. And by examining what Defoe knew and did not know about America, what he falsely believed and what he knowingly fal- sified, Defoe’s America probes the doubts, hesitancies, and contradic- tions he had about the colonial project he so fervently promoted. dennis todd is Associate Professor of English at Georgetown University. A specialist in eighteenth-century American and British literature and culture, he has written on Daniel Defoe, Alexander Pope, Jonathan Swift, William Hogarth, John Arbuthnot, and early science. He authored Imagining Monsters: Miscreations of the Self in Eighteenth-Century Literature (1995) and edited, with Cynthia Wall, Eighteenth-Century Genre and Culture: Serious Reflections on Occasional