Commentary on Hebrews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Commentary on Hebrews THE NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARY VOL. IX.—EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. BY R. MILLIGAN Late President of the College of the Bible in Kentucky University. GOSPEL LIGHT PUBLISHING COMPANY DELIGHT, ARKANSAS Printed in U. S. A. PUBLISHERS' PREFACE. IN announcing the volume on Hebrews of the NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARY, we are pained to state that the author of it did not live till it had passed through the press. Still, we are rejoiced that his work on it was complete before he was called away from this scene of his labors. We doubt not the work will be received as a valuable contribution to Biblical criticism on its own merits. It will be doubly dear to a host of friends of the deceased who had the highest regard for him personally while living, and who, now that he has passed into the spirit-land, hold him in most affectionate remembrance. A brief sketch of his life and character will be found at the end of this volume. For writing this volume on Hebrews, President Milligan possessed some very rare qualifications. He was a man of most deep and fervent piety. This brought him into close sympathy with our Savior in his mediatorial and priestly offices. Then his general and accurate scholarship, his practical experience as a teacher, and above all his ardent love for the truth, and nothing but the truth, at once made it impossible for him to fail in a work of this kind. The volume is not burdened with new interpretation or original views. The author has aimed to be safe rather than brilliant; faithful to the Divine Spirit rather than original; and eminently practical rather than novel. Still it shows that he had decided opinions of his own, and these are always freely given when it is thought to be necessary. Nevertheless, the work is decidedly .conservative. Every-where we see stamped upon it this peculiar characteristic of the author's mind. President Milligan was naturally a very prudent man, while his profound reverence for the word of God, and his constant anxiety lest he might lead some one astray, tended to quicken the natural bent of his (iii) iv PUBLISHERS' PREFACE. mind, and shut out all doubtful interpretations, even when the temptation was very great. And it ought to be said, furthermore, that not only his habits of mind, but his studies as well, led him to discredit every thing in the new school of criticism, and threw him largely upon the old critics for help. Hence his work from beginning to end has the flavor of the old authors, and may be said to occupy a middle ground between the old and new schools of criticism. While it relies chiefly on the old English commentators as authorities, it is nevertheless well up to the demands of the present times in Biblical criticism. The plan of this volume does not materially differ from the one on Matthew and Mark, and yet there are some features in this that are specially worthy of mention. It will be noticed that each section is preceded by a very careful and full analysis. This we think will be found valuable to the student as helping him at once to comprehend the whole argument. Besides this, each section is followed by practical reflections which are always interesting and sometimes of great value. These supply largely a homiletical part which we doubt not will be very acceptable to most students and especially preachers of the gospel. The author had made the study of topology a specialty for many years of his life, and he has freely given us the results of his studies in this volume. And it is believed that his treatment of the types will receive the highest commendation from those who are at all competent to judge. We feel confident that this interesting study will receive new interest from what President Milligan has written, and we do not hesitate to call special attention to this portion of his work. INTRODUCTION. THE main historical circumstances of this Epistle may be summed up and considered under the following general heads: I. By whom was the Epistle written? II. Is it, or is it not, of canonical authority? III. To whom was it written? IV. For what purpose was it written? V. When and where was it written? VI. In what language was it written? SECTION I. BY WHOM WAS THE EPISTLE WRITTEN? Some have ascribed it to Clement of Rome; some to Barnabas, the companion of Paul; some to Silas or Silvanus; some to Apollos; some to Aquila; some to Mark; and some to Paul the Apostle. These hypotheses have all been maintained by able critics, and with some show of reason, as any one may see by referring to Davidson's Introduction to the New Testament, Alford's Prolegomena, or Stewart's Introduction to this Epistle. But to my mind, it is quite evident that the last of these is the only hypothesis that is really worthy of our consideration, because it is the only one that is sustained by any reliable evidence. The others are all purely conjectural; and hence if it can be shown that Paul did not write the Epistle, then indeed we may as well give up all further inquiry about its authorship, and wait patiently for the revelations of the day of judgment. But that it is one of Paul's genuine Epistles seems, at least, quite probable from the following considerations: (5) 6 EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. I. It is ascribed to Paid by many of the Christian Fathers, who, so far as we know, had the best means of information with regard to both its genuineness and its authenticity. 1. The first of these is PANTAENUS, an eminent Oriental scholar, who was for several years President of the Catechetical School of sacred learning in Egypt. He flourished about A. D. 180, and he is spoken of by Eusebius and Jerome as a man of great learning and influence. None of his writings are now extant, but his testimony with regard to the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews is given by Clement of Alexandria in his work called Hypotyposis (Institutions). The work itself is now lost, but Clement's testimony, embracing that of Pantaenus, is given in an extract from it, preserved by Eusebius in the fourteenth chapter of the sixth book of his Ecclesiastical History. In this extract, Clement is attempting to explain why it is that Paul did not connect his name with the Epistle, and after giving his own opinion, he says, "But now as the blessed Presbyter [Pantaenus] used to say, Since the Lord, who was the Apostle of the Almighty, was sent to the Hebrews, Paul, by reason of his inferiority, as if sent to the Gentiles, did not subscribe himself an Apostle to the Hebrews, both out of reverence for the Lord, and because he wrote of his abundance to the Hebrews, as a herald and Apostle to the Gentiles." This testimony is very direct, and comes from one who had rare opportunities of judging correctly about such matters. He had heard, as we learn from Photius, those who had seen the Apostles; and according to Eusebius (Eccl. Hist. B. v. 10), he was, on account of his great learning and piety, sent by Julian, Bishop of Alexandria, as a missionary to the East, even as far as to India. He was also, according to the same historian (Eccl. Hist. B. vi. 14), very highly commended by Alexander, Bishop of Jerusalem, about A. D. 212. And hence it would seem that the testimony of Pantaenus is entitled to very great respect in the settlement of this question. In matters of opinion he was of course liable to err, as we all are, and I do not therefore attach much importance to the reason which he assigns, in explanation of the fact, that Paul did not attach his name to the Epistle. 2. Next to the testimony of Pantaenus comes that of CLEMENT of Alexandria. He was for some time a pupil of Pantaenus, and about A. D. 187 he succeeded him as President of the Catechetical School in Alexandria. His birthplace is uncertain, but in his Stromata (Miscellanies), he tells us that he had been instructed by one teacher in Italy, one in Greece, two in the East, and one in Egypt. (Lard. Cred. AUTHORSHIP. 7 Vol. ii. 22.) He was therefore, no doubt, well acquainted with the prevailing opinions of both the Eastern and Western churches, touching the Canon of the Holy Scriptures. In his Ecclesiastical History (B. vi. 14), Eusebius has recorded the testimony of Clement with regard to the authorship of our Epistle. Eusebius says, "In his work called Hypotyposis, he [Clement] affirms that Paul is the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews; and that, as it was addressed to the Hebrews, it was originally written in their language, and afterward translated by Luke for the Greeks;—which is the reason why the coloring of the style is the same in this Epistle and in the Acts of the Apostles. The reason why Paul did not affix his name to the head of it, probably is, because the Hebrews had conceived a prejudice against him, and were suspicious of him. Very prudently, therefore, did he not place his name at the head of the Epistle, so as to divert them from the perusal of it." In his other works, Clement testifies several times to the same effect, touching the authorship of this Epistle.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Yale/New Canaan Bible Study the Epistle to the Hebrews Introduction
    Yale/New Canaan Bible Study The Epistle to the Hebrews Introduction The “Epistle to the Hebrews,” a marvelous piece of early Christian homiletics, is a bit of a mystery among the texts of the New Testament. Since at least the third century it has been included in the epistles of Paul, although it does not name its author and in style and vocabulary it does not display Pauline traits. While labeled an epistle, and resembling an epistle at its conclusion, it does not have the characteristic salutation and thanksgiving sections that begin most Pauline epistles. It is, above all, a homily, a “word of exhortation” as its author calls it (13:22), crafted with considerable rhetorical skill, calling some unidentified Christian community to a renewed faith in Christ. Author The identity of the author of Hebrews has puzzled readers from the start. Although some ancient Christians accepted it as Pauline, others, recognizing the stylistic difficulties, thought that it might have been written by companions of Paul such as Luke or Barnabas. Origen, the famous Alexandrian theologian of the third century, thought that Paul was responsible for the content, but that someone else actually penned the text. “God only knows” who that someone was. Ever since the Reformation readers have explored other possibilities. Luther, for example, suggested that Apollos the Alexandrian missionary mentioned in Acts 18 and 1 Corinthians, wrote the piece. Many other names have been proposed, including Priscilla, another collaborator of Paul, who was suggested by the famous German church historian Adolf von Harnack. The suggestion 1 is intriguing but is incompatible with the masculine self reference (11:32), but there is no decisive evidence for any candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • From Hebrews to John: a Common Christic Credo?
    SCRIPTA FULGENTINA Año XXVII - Nº 53-54 ESTUDIOS 2017 Páginas 7-33 From Hebrews to John: A Common Christic Credo? © REV. ANDREAS HOECK, S.S.D. Saint John Vianney Theological Seminary Denver, CO 80210 Summary: This essay scrutinizes the twenty-three textual parallels between the Letter to the Hebrews and the Gospel of John; all of those correlations are related exclusively to Christ. In fact, they constitute a complete, albeit skeletal, full-circle Christic Creed: commencing with an emphasis on the Creator, it then depicts some aspects of his Incarnation, followed by his Paschal mystery, and closing with his mission as Messianic Savior who will return in eschatological glory. This finding begs the question of any mutual literary and theological influence between these writings: it seems best to assume that the Pauline thought expressed in Hebrews did have an impact on the theology of John prior to the traditionally late divulgation of his Gospel beginning in Ephesus. Resumen: Este ensayo examina los veintitrés paralelos textuales entre la Carta a los Hebreos y el Evangelio de Juan; todas esas correlaciones están relacionadas exclusivamente con Cristo. De hecho, constituyen un Credo Cristiano completo, aunque esquelético, de círculo completo: comenzando con un énfasis en el Creador, luego describe algunos aspectos de su Encarnación, seguido por su misterio pascual, y cerrando con su misión como Salvador Mesiánico que regresará en gloria escatológica. Este hallazgo plantea la cuestión de la influencia literaria y teológica mutua entre estos escritos: parece mejor 7 suponer que el pensamiento paulino expresado en Hebreos tuvo un impacto en la teología de Juan antes de la divulgación tradicionalmente tardía de su Evangelio comenzando en Éfeso.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Herald for 1900
    aaatWaloisle "Here is the Patience of the Saints: Here are they that keep the Commandments of God, and the Faith of Jesus." Rev. 14 :12. VOL. 77, No. 52. BATTLE CREEK, MICH., DECEMBER 25, 1900. WHOLE No., 2408. ahe 1Review anb lberatb it HOW MUCH OWEST THOU? " also chapters ,27 and 28; for here are stated plainly ISSUED WEEKLY BY THE the blessings of obedience. These- Seventh - day Adventist Publishing Association MRS. E. G. WHITE directions, which the Lord gave to His people, express the principles of the law of the BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN THIS is the holilv season. At this time large kingdom of God, and they are made specific, so Terms, in Advance sums of moneyare spent for presents and in need- that the minds of the people may not be left in One Year.. .......... ....$1.50 Four Months $ .so less self-indulgence. Pride, fashion, and luxuri- ignorance and uncertainty. These scriptures pre- Eight Months ,.00 Three Months 40 sent the never-ceasing obligation of all whom God Six Months .75 Two Months .25 ous living swallow up immense sums which are worse than thrown away; for this needless use of las blessed with life and health and advantages Address all communications and make all Drafts and means encourages prodigal expenditure, and often in temporal and spiritual things. The message Money Orders payable to — money is used in ways that injure health and has not grown weak because of age. God's REVIEW AND HERALD, Battle Creek, Mich. claims are just as binding now, just as fresh in [ENTERED AT 111E POST OFFICE AT BATTLE CREEK] endanger souls.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presentation February 2, 2020 RCL: Malachi 3:1-4; Psalm 84 Or
    The Presentation February 2, 2020 RCL: Malachi 3:1-4; Psalm 84 or Psalm 24:7-10; Hebrews 2:14-18; Luke 2:22-40 Malachi 3:1-4 The Book of Malachi, a name that literally means “my messenger,” was written in the period following Israel’s exile in Babylonian and subsequent return, circa sixth century B.C. Malachi addressed a number of justice-related issues, but his book contains a great deal of reflection on the Temple cult of sacrifice and its priesthood. The theme of the Temple runs throughout our readings today. Malachi in this first text sets out a warning that one is coming to purify the priesthood of abuses the prophet outlined in vv 1:6-2:9. The prophet’s concern for the integrity of Temple ritual speaks to the great reverence and respect our tradition has long attached to liturgy. Ours is an era that sometimes struggles with the temptation to coopt liturgy for ideological purposes. Malachi reminds us that worship is directed to God, not us, and requires that we execute it with reverence. Malachi’s is not a call to any sense of strict traditionalism, nor does it in any way foreclose development of our liturgical practices. Rather, the prophet underscores that worship is the outward expression of the deep faith and eternal longing of the heart. He calls us to view our outward offerings to the Lord as the fruit of a righteous heart (v. 3). • Is there a word or phrase from this reading that resonates with you? • What are the challenges to reverent and proper worship we face in our own time that require “purification and refinement”? Psalm 84 The theme of the Temple and its central place in the believer’s life continues in today’s psalm.
    [Show full text]
  • George Gebhardt Ç”Μå½± ĸ²È¡Œ (Ť§Å…¨)
    George Gebhardt 电影 串行 (大全) The Dishonored https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-dishonored-medal-3823055/actors Medal A Rural Elopement https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/a-rural-elopement-925215/actors The Fascinating https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-fascinating-mrs.-francis-3203424/actors Mrs. Francis Mr. Jones at the https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/mr.-jones-at-the-ball-3327168/actors Ball A Woman's Way https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/a-woman%27s-way-3221137/actors For Love of Gold https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/for-love-of-gold-3400439/actors The Sacrifice https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-sacrifice-3522582/actors The Honor of https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-honor-of-thieves-3521294/actors Thieves The Greaser's https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-greaser%27s-gauntlet-3521123/actors Gauntlet The Tavern https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-tavern-keeper%27s-daughter-1756994/actors Keeper's Daughter The Stolen Jewels https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-stolen-jewels-3231041/actors Love Finds a Way https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/love-finds-a-way-3264157/actors An Awful Moment https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/an-awful-moment-2844877/actors The Unknown https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-unknown-3989786/actors The Fatal Hour https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-fatal-hour-961681/actors The Curtain Pole https://zh.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-curtain-pole-1983212/actors
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
    LESSON EIGHT THE LETTER TO THE HEBREWS A. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS: This epistle along with James was written to Christian Jews. The epistle of James was written to the Christian Jews scattered abroad while the epistle to the Hebrews was written to the Christian Jews at Jerusalem. It was written before Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD and while the Jewish temple was still standing with magnificent splendor. The rituals and sacrifices were still being carried on. The probable date of the writing was between 62 AD and 68 AD. This epistle is written in eloquent style and occupies a very important place in the Scriptures. It is a commentary on the Book of Leviticus and explains the significance of the Jewish rituals. In this epistle we are taught that we have passed from the realm of shadows into that of reality. It shows that Christianity is not a religion merely of anticipation, but of participation. B. AUTHORSHIP: The epistle to the Hebrews is anonymous and we cannot be certain regarding the identity of the author. It has been suggested that Luke, Barnabas or Apollos might have written it. However, there are some strong reasons for concluding that the Apostle Paul wrote this epistle. 1. The writer was associated with Timothy (Hebrews 13:23). 2. The writer was in bonds (Hebrews 10:34; 13:19). 3. The writer was writing from Italy (Hebrews 13:24). 4. The writer was a Jew who was very familiar with the Jewish history and religion. 5. The teachings are the same and the presentation of these doctrines is similar to those found in the other Pauline Epistles.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge and Values
    1 Academic Knowledge Orientation Program and 2020 Values 2 Contents From Another Time (1940) * Jonathan Becker, “What a Liberal Arts Education is…and is Not?” 3 William Carlos Williams, “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” 82 From Pictures from Brueghel and Other Poems (1962) Immanuel Kant, “What is Enlightenment?” 14 Muriel Rukeyser, “Waiting for Icarus” 82 From Breaking Open (1973) Herodotus Selections (c.460 BCE – 425 BCE) 19 From The History, David Grene, trans. Zbigniew Herbert, “Daedalus and Icarus”. 83 From The Collected Poems 1956-1998, tr. Alissa Valles, 2014 * Plato, The Republic, Book 7 (the Allegory of the Cave) 20 (c. 360 BCE), from Complete Works (G.M Grube, trans.). Carol Ann Duffy, “Mrs. Icarus” 84 From The World's Wife, 1999 * Rene Descartes, “Meditations I and II” 33 From Meditations,tr. Michael Moriarty Anne Sexton, “To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Triumph”. 85 From Selected Poems, 2000 The White Ministers’ Law and Order Statement 39 (1963) and White Ministers’ Good Friday Statement (1963) Edward Field, “Icarus” 85 * Martin Luther King, Jr., “Letter From a Birmingham Jail” (1963) 41 From Stand Up, Friend, with Me , 1963 From Letters of a Nation: A Collection of Extraordinary Letters Joanie V. Mackowski, “Consciousness”, From Poetry, 2012 86 Franz Kafka, “A Report to An Academy” 52 Willa and Edwin Muir, trans. Alykul Osmonov, “Native Tongue”, “Man” 87 From, Waves of the Lake, 1995. Ryūnosuke Akutagawa, “The Nose”, From Rashōmon 58 and Seventeen Other Stories, tr. Jay Rubin 2006. Rainer Maria Rilke, “The Panther”, “Der Panther” 88 From Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke, Nikolay Gogol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epistle to the Hebrews
    YSC College Bible Study Jesus Christ Our High Priest YOUTH SPIRITUAL COMPETITION 2013 COLLEGE LEVEL A Study of The Epistle to the Hebrews Part I YSC 2013 Page 1 High School Hebrews YSC College Bible Study Jesus Christ Our High Priest Part 1: Introduction I. The Structure of the Holy Bible The Holy Bible consists of 73 books. There are 46 books in the Old Testament, 39 of which are recognized by all Christians and you can find in the Holy Bible that you usually purchase, and then there are the 7 Deutro-canonical books recognized by the Coptic Orthodox Church. The New Testament consists of 27 books. II. The Structure of the New Testament · The New Testament is divided into o 4 Gospels (also known as the Good News) . The four Gospels were written by the saint bearing its name: . the Gospel according to St. Matthew, . the Gospel according to St. Mark, . the Gospel according to St. Luke, . and the Gospel according to St. John. o Acts of the Apostles (Praxis), written by St. Luke. o 14 Pauline Epistles, written by St. Paul. o 7 Catholic Epistles (Catholicon) . St. James (1 Epistle) . St. Peter (2 Epistles) . St. John (3 Epistles) . St. Jude (1 Epistle) o Revelation (Apocalypse), written by St. John the Theologian. YSC 2013 Page 2 High School Hebrews YSC College Bible Study Jesus Christ Our High Priest THE NEW TESTAMENT THE 27 BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT YSC 2013 Page 3 High School Hebrews YSC College Bible Study Jesus Christ Our High Priest III. The Structure of the Pauline Epistles The Pauline Epistles Can Be Organized into Several Ways A.
    [Show full text]
  • Publisher's Note
    Publisher's Note "SATHYA SAI SPEAKS" Series is, according to late Prof. N. Kasturi, the original translator and compiler, "a fragrant bouquet of flowers that never fade or falter". These discourses were delivered by Swaami out of profound compassion towards seekers of Truth during the last few decades. The need for revised and enlarged editions of the Series was strongly felt and expressed by devotees, especially by foreigners. An attempt has therefore been made in these volumes to meet their needs. The discourses have been presented year-wise so that there is no overlapping of the discourses delivered in a year, in more than one volume pertaining to the same calendar year. This rearrangement has resulted in an increase in the number of volumes, from the previous twelve to the present fifteen volumes, covering the years 1953 to 1982. Further new volumes will also be added in due course, to cover the discourses delivered after 1982. The retention of Sanskrit words on page after page, in the previous volumes, without their English equivalents in most cases, was causing great confusion to readers, especially foreigners, who were not familiar with Sanskrit. In the present revised volumes, an attempt has been made to aid easy reading by replacing Sanskrit words with English equivalents wherever they do not affect Baaba's original expression. Sanskrit words have been retained wherever it was felt necessary to preserve the essence of the original expression of Baaba and where the English equivalents may not do full justice to the text in the particular context. However, in all such places the English equivalents have been given along with the Sanskrit words.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epistle to the HEBREWS
    Color profile: Disabled Composite 140 lpi at 45 degrees The Epistle to the HEBREWS GARETH LEE COCKERILL William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company Grand Rapids, Michigan / Cambridge, U.K. EERDMANS -- NICNT The Epistle to the Hebrews (Cockerill) final text Monday, March 05, 2012 11:33:41 AM 3 Color profile: Disabled Composite 140 lpi at 45 degrees ©2012GarethLeeCockerill All rights reserved Published 2012 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. 2140 Oak Industrial Drive N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505 / P.O. Box 163, Cambridge CB3 9PU U.K. Printed in the United States of America 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cockerill, Gareth Lee. The Epistle to the Hebrews / Gareth Lee Cockerill. pages cm. — (The New international Commentary on the New Testament) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 978-0-8028-2492-9 (cloth: alk. paper) 1. Bible. N.T. Hebrews — Commentaries. I. Title. BS2775.3.C625 2012 227¢.8707 — dc23 2011052836 www.eerdmans.com EERDMANS -- NICNT The Epistle to the Hebrews (Cockerill) final text Monday, March 05, 2012 11:33:41 AM 4 Color profile: Disabled Composite 140 lpi at 45 degrees CONTENTS Editor’s Preface xii Author’s Preface xiii Abbreviations xvi Bibliography xxiv INTRODUCTION 1 I. HEBREWS IN ITS ENVIRONMENT 2 A. The Pastor Who Wrote Hebrews 2 1. Authorship and Canonicity 3 2. Candidates for Authorship—AReview 6 B. The Pastor’s Sermon 11 C. The Pastor’s Congregation 16 1. What the Sermon Reveals about Its Hearers 16 2. Were These Hearers Jewish or Gentile in Background? 19 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Early New Testament Canons
    Early New Testament Canons illegallyAlexander or sledge-hammers.leasing infrequently. Wang Unsinewing impaling Magnuscloudily? Sanforize or transcendentalizing some scarps overwhelmingly, however dedicational Billie demoralizes His own gospels vary, early new testament canons of irenaeus, among scholars do another source goes to How We Got the New Testament: Text, Transmission, Translation. New testament were derived from which early new testament. Church history and caused much better greek? Alpha and Omega Ministries is a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. But there may argue even death for understanding biblical account was early new? Please check your knowledge. What were the principal criteria by which various books were recognized as being a part of the NT Scriptures? New Testament history set by the end shuffle the way century. Another factor which included romans as canonical gospels which were mentioned by no. Word of God for eternal life. How do you have no conspiracy about their canons we owe it would be used it was going out a canonization. Church in Jerusalem using? After all, Judaism achieved a closed canon without primary reliance on the codex. This demonstrates that loan were in circulation before whose time. It more specifically this? Jesus as the revealer of the inner truth about the cellular human utility than and find the Mark, down in Matthew. Well as early church tradition, testaments were also their way that john, beneficial but only thing. Gospels, four books; the Acts of the Apostles, one hang; the Epistles of Paul, thirteen; of the supplement to the Hebrews; one Epistle; of Peter, two; of John, apostle, three; of James, one; of Jude, one; the Revelation of John.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolegomenon to the Study of Hebrews' Use of Scripture
    PROLEGOMENON TO THE STUDY OF HEBREWS' USE OF SCRIPTURE: A METHODOLOGICAL, TEXTUAL, AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INQUIRY by MICHEL ROBERT DESJARDINS B.A., University of Alberta at Le College Universitaire St. Jean, 1972 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of RELIGIOUS STUDIES We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August, 1976 @ Michel Sobert Desjardins, 1976 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of R eiiQAO <xS U. cj(£P The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date Qt4/7£ ABSTRACT This thesis is principally an examination of modern research concerning the author of Hebrews' use of Scripture.lt focuses on how recent interpreters of this letter have supported their theories. The paper's intent is to show that modern research in a variety of fields is making it increasingly more difficult for the interprete to arrive at conclusions that can be confidently backed. This study covers the areas that are considered to be important for understanding Hebrews' use of Scripture.
    [Show full text]